+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Unit 1. Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like,...

Unit 1. Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like,...

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: adele-short
View: 221 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
Unit 1
Transcript
Page 1: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Unit 1

Page 2: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only be found in a truly good and just society

As a starting point, most accept the need for a legitimate authority to create and enforce laws within a group/society/state (political, religious, etc.).

Generally speaking, the law is a set of rules that tell people what they can and cannot do. Failure to abide by these rules usually results in consequences or punishments.

Most of the time, laws are followed if they are seen as reasonable and just.

Page 3: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Natural law was generally assumed to be the proper basis of legislative law in the 19th century. It was "the law above the law."

It has been seriously challenged and almost eclipsed by a rival theory of law in the 20th century — namely, "positive law" which simply means that man makes up his own law.

Instead of consulting universal principles, man consults his own needs, wants, and agendas, or the changing norms of the society in which he lives.

Page 4: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Natural Law is the philosophical basis of law. It is unwritten Underlies moral principals of wright and

wrong, which can be derived by reasoning and heeding to one’s conscience

Argues that a universal moral command exists for making and judging laws

It is the conscience of the legal system

Page 5: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Positive Law is the working of the law through the authority of

the state. A human creation Laws are established by the state for the good of

the state as a whole Law has no moral purpose (other than survival of

the state). It refers to written rules that must be followed to

the letter regardless of circumstance Anyone who violates the law must be punished

according to the written rules

Page 6: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Socrates Morality is an

important part of natural law.

Laws are meant to help people to live the right way; they help people become better people.

True justice lies in obeying law that is based on the eternal principles that govern the universe

Page 7: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Plato Harmony between

the individual and society are important components of morality and thus natural law.

Human laws must be based on knowledge of the eternal laws that rule the universe.

Education produces good behaviour.

Page 8: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Aristotle Law has moral

purpose People are not all

good, and education alone cannot ensure that people will be good.

Only laws can ensure the good behaviour of all people.

Using reason, humans can develop their greatest potential within the state.

Page 9: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

“Law is the mind and reason of intelligent man, the standard by which justice and injustice are measured.”

However, civil or human laws should be set aside if, in the minds of wise men, they contradict the laws of nature. Thus, it would be permissible for citizens to withdraw their support from a government that enacted “evil” laws.

Page 10: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

St. Thomas Aquinas Natural law is the eternal

law (from God) that operates in humans.

Human law is the product of reason which is based on natural law and is made public by society’s ruler.

This ruler is responsible for the “care” of the community.

It is published so that everyone knows it (made public).

A moral obligation exists to obey just laws

Page 11: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Thomas Hobbes All people are prone to violence

and disorder; this is their natural state.

People did not form governments to recognize and defend their natural-law rights, but to ensure law and order through strong leadership.

Positive law exists to maintain peace and order and control the greed, fear and violence that are part of human nature

Proposed the concept of a “Social Contract”

Page 12: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

The idea of a social contract is premised on the notion that an individual's liberty and property are better secured if we band ourselves together than if we are left alone, each to our own devices.

Given a choice, a typical person would:o give up certain of his rights in exchange for peace and

security, ando put himself under government and follow its rules, made

and fairly enforced.

This arrangement is in the nature of a contract - an exchange:o Citizens provide obedience and compliance in exchange

for greater security and liberty

Page 13: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

John Locke People have “natural

rights”; which include “life, liberty, and property”

The law of the state must protect these fundamental rights.

If the ruler violated the natural rights of the people, the people were justified in rebelling against the ruler and replacing the government with one that respected these rights.

Page 14: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Is John Locke a natural or positive law philosopher?

o Three-minute philosophy – John Locke

Page 15: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Utilitarianism: Humans are motivated to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Thus, law should seek to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

A system of law has the following requirements:o authoritative body,o legal commands,o an imposed duty or obedience, ando enforcement through penalties.

Page 16: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.
Page 17: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Law is a body of rules that describe what ought to be.

Legal Formalism believes that absolutes exist.

Judges can only apply the law as it exists. Cases are decided by specific rules, standards, and common meaning of the laws in force.

The judge's experiences, persuasions, and how he or she feels play no part.

Also called Legal Conservatism.

Page 18: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Also known as Judicial Activism Argues that judges are the authors of

law. Law is all about value judgments. The Court, not Parliament, really

makes the law. Judges shape law to suit own pre-

conceived notions of justice.o Theorists: Oliver Wendall Holmes &

William James

Page 19: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Karl Marx Focused on the failure of

the legal system to treat society equally.

Since the ruling class controls the formation of the law, they use it to suppress the working class.

This idea can be extended to describe the inequalities of the law as applied to minority groups, as well as “feminine jurisprudence”.

Page 20: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Purpose of law is resource allocation. Economic impact should be

considered, not just morality.o Ex: bicycle helmets should be

mandatory only if the savings (use of health services) outweighed the cost of enforcement.

o Theorists: Richard Posner

Page 21: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

philosophy of law based on the political, economic, and social equality of sexes.

The theory that the law is used as an instrument of oppression by men against women. (example: voting)

Male-written history has created a bias in the concepts of human nature, gender potential, and social arrangements.

Gender is created socially, not biologically. Sex determines such matters as physical appearance and reproductive capacity, but not psychological, moral, or social traits.o Theorists: Martha Fineman,,Catharine Mackinnon, Susan Orkin,

Page 22: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Extension of Legal Realism which became a movement during 1970’s and 80’s

Profoundly influenced by civil rights movement of the 1960’s

No method of lawmaking is truly neutral. Interpretation and meaning of Law depends

on circumstances and human choice. Law is about value choices. Judges should be given discretion to ensure

the law achieves justice.

Page 23: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

The idea that a valid law must include procedures that are “fair and workable” (can be applied equally?)

Connected to principle of “Rule of Law”1. Law is necessary in an orderly society2. The law applies equally to everyone3. A person’s legal rights will not be taken away except in

accordance with the law Connected to the principle of fundamental justice

o i.e. sections 7-14 and 24 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

concerns the fairness and the transparency of the processes by which decisions are made (legislative or judicial)

Page 24: Unit 1.  Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx disagreed over what society ought to be like, BUT agreed that a truly good and just life can only.

Justice depends on there being an independent body or branch of government that can challenge, review, and limit the laws made by the ruling power (Courts?).

The courts, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada, are responsible for acting as a “restraining influence” on the law making power of Parliament.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects the rights of individuals and minorities, but these rights can be limited for the “common good”.

It asserts that judges should not hesitate to strike down a law that is obviously unconstitutionalo Theorists – Philip Selznick


Recommended