Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | neil-wilkerson |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2
SCaMP - agenda
Welcome & Introduction Julie Taylor, Head of Water Process, UU
Our experiences / results to datea)SSSI conditionb)BAPsc)Water Quality resultsd)Tenant viabilitye)Multiple benefits
Ed Lawrance, UUNigel Pilling, UUPete Worrall, PAABryan Homan, UUKate Snow, UU
Break
Our partners’ experiencesa)RSPB – bird monitoringb)EA - flooding
Roy Taylor, RSPBAdam Bayliss, EA
Moving forwarda)Non-owned catchmentsb)Kinder - National Trustc)Woodhead - Moors for the Future
SCaMP 2
Kate Snow, UUPatricia Rice, National TrustChris Dean, MFFPaul Phillips, UU
Closing remarks Bryan Homan, UU
Lunch
Optional SCaMP site visit
3
SCaMP - welcome
Pivotal time for SCaMP
Reflect on progress and success to date
Moving the programme forward
5
SSSIs
United Utilities owns 58,000ha of land
• 17,478ha are SSSI
Government’s 2004 spending review
• 95% of SSSIs in England to be favourable or unfavorable recovering by 31/12/10
England achieving 67.4% target on 31/3/2005
United Utilities SSSI land was achieving 31% at the same time
http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/protected/sssi/psa.htm
10
Four year effect of Grip blocking
Goyt – grip blocked and infilling with vegetation naturally
Outcome – reduced amplitude of water table, water table closer to surface, so blanket bog condition will be wetter and more consistently wet with fewer drying periods.
2006 2008 2009
11
Effect of Grip blocking on the water table
High amplitude and low water table in unblocked grips
Much reduced amplitude and higher water table after blocking (pre-dated equipment installation – settling period needed first)