Melting of vortex lattice in 2D MoGe thin film
Surajit Dutta1, Indranil Roy1, Aditya N. Roy Choudhury1, Somak Basistha1, IIaria Maccari2, Soumyajit Mandal, John Jesudasan1, Vivas
Bagwe1, Claudio Castellani2, Lara Benfatto2 and Pratap Raychaudhuri1
1Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai- 4000052ISC-CNR and Department of physics, Sapienza university of Rome, P.Ie A. Moro, 00185, Rome, Italy
Sample preparation
Thin film of MoGe is deposited on thermally oxidized Si substrate
using pulse laser deposition technique (PLD) at room temperature
and base pressure ~ 1𝐸 − 6 mbr.
Measurement Techniques
1. Ac Screening Response :
Sample is placed between primary
coil (quadrupolar) and secondary
coil (dipolar). Ac screening response
of thin film superconductor is
determined using probing field
3.5 mOe by passing small ac drive
current (Id) 0.5 mA (frequency, f = 31 kHz)
through primary coil. Mutual Inductance
between primary and secondary coil is defined as,
𝑀 = 𝑀𝑅 + 𝑖𝑀𝐼 =𝑉𝑝
2𝜋𝑓𝐼𝑑
MR & MI are real part and imaginary part of mutual inductance.
Mutual inductance between two coil depends on complex screening
length of the sample. Therefore complex screening length can be
computed numerically using experimental value of mutual
inductance. Expression of complex screening length is given by,
λ𝑓−2 = 𝑖2𝜋𝑓𝜎𝜇0 = λ
−2 + 𝑖𝛿−2
λ is penetration depth and δ is skin depth, σ is complex conductivity
of the material, 𝜇0 is free space permeability.
2. Magneto-transport :
Resistivity measurements are performed in 4 probe geometry
configuration by passing 50 µA dc current as function of temperature
and magnetic field. Dc nano voltmeter is used to measure the
voltage.
3. Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy (STS) :
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy is done by using low temperature
home made scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Lowest
temperature of the system is 450 mK and Maximum magnetic field
can be applied to 9 T.
STM is operated at constant current mode and tip of ourSTM system
is metallic (Pt-Ir). Expression of tunneling current between normal
metal and superconductor is given by,
𝐼𝑛𝑠 =𝐺𝑛𝑛
𝑒∞−∞𝑑𝐸
𝑁𝑠(𝐸)
𝑁𝑛(0)[𝑓 𝐸 − 𝑓(𝐸 + 𝑒𝑣)]
And tunneling conductance can be written as,
𝐺𝑛𝑠 ∝1
𝑅𝑛න
−∞
∞
𝑑𝐸 𝑁𝑠(𝐸)[−𝜕𝑓(𝐸 + 𝑒𝑣)
𝜕(𝑒𝑣)]
Experimentally tunneling conductance is obtained by applying
voltage modulation technique.
𝐼𝑛𝑠 𝑉𝑑𝑐 + 𝑉𝑎𝑐𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝜔𝑡 ≅ 𝐼𝑛𝑠 𝑉𝑑𝑐 +𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑠𝑑𝑉
⃒𝑉𝑑𝑐(𝑉𝑎𝑐𝑆𝑖𝑛(𝜔𝑡))
Superconducting and normal region can be easily distinguished base
on tunneling conductance. Therefore vortex images are taken using
this technique.
V
A
Introduction
We report melting of vortex lattice with increasing magnetic field in
amorphous MoGe thin films of thickness 21 nm which is much less
than the bending length of the vortex lines. Therefore, vortex lattice
of this film is 2 dimensional. Here melting process follows 2-step
BKTHNY melting : (1) solid phase- hexatic fluid phase (appearance
of dislocation pairs) and (2) hexatic fluid phase- isotropic liquid
phase (breaking of dislocation pairs into isolated dislocations:
disclination). This intermediate hexatic fluid phase has quasi long
range orientational order and exponentially decaying translation
order. It has zero share modulus. Therefore no finite critical current
can exist in hexatic fluid phase.
we show this sequence of phase transition of vortex
lattice driven by magnetic field at temperature 2K in this Amorphous
MoGe thin film by combining real space imaging of vortex lattice
using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy (STS), magneto-transport
and ac screening response (low frequency penetration depth)
measurements.
Characterization of Solid phase
& liquid phase based on
experimentally measurable
quantity
Thermally activated flux flow resistance : In the solid phase, underlying potential of the vortex lattice is given by[3] ,
U I = U0(IcI)α
Thermally activated flux flow resistance, RTAFF = RFFExp −U
KBT
RFF is flux flow resistance which is defined by usual Bardeen –
stephen relation, V = RFF(I − Ic) and IC is critical current.
Therefore, RTAFF → 0when I → 0
In liquid phase, underlying potential of the vortex lattice is UL which
is independent of current, I.
Thermally activated flux flow resistance can be written as,
RTAFF = RFFExp(−ULKBT
)
So, RTAFF ≠ 0 when I → 0
Complex ac screening length[2,3] : In presence of ac magnetic field, complex screening length is defined as in liquid state,
λ𝑎𝑐−2
= 𝑖𝜇0𝜔𝐵2
[η +𝛼𝐿𝑒
𝑈𝐾𝐵𝑇
𝜔0]
Where as in solid phase, λ𝑎𝑐−2 =
𝜇0
𝐵2𝛼𝐿
Experimental results Summary
➢ Thickness of the sample is measured
using Ambios XP2 stylus profilometer
Variation of resistance with temperature at
zero magnetic field
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
50
100
150
200
250
R (
)
T (K)
Low frequency magnetic shielding response
20
40
60
80
2 3 4 5 6 7 8-40
-20
0
MR (
nH
)
0 Oe
3 Oe
4 Oe
5 Oe
7 Oe
12 Oe
20 Oe
50 Oe
0.1 kOe
0.2 kOe
0.3 kOe
1 kOe
5 kOe
MI (n
H)
T(K)
Real part & imaginary part of the mutual inductance
Basic characterization of the sample
Tunneling Spectra and corresponding temperature dependence of energy gap (Δ)
which is well fitted with conventional BCS relation, ∆(0)
KBTc= 2.17
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
,
(m
eV)
T (K)
BCS fit
-4 -2 0 2 4
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
G [
V]
V (mV)
0.45 K
0.97 K
1.55 K
2.15 K
2.65 K
3.75 K
4.45 K
5.30 K
6.60 K
7.60 K
Tunneling Spectra ( tunneling conductance, G [V]) is fitted with usual
BCS relation with modifying density of state of superconductor,
Ns E = Re{E+iΓ
|E|+iΓ 2−∆2} . Γ is phenomenological temperature
broadening parameter.
Critical temperature is 6.95 K
Real part of ac screening length (λ−2) goes to zero for magnetic field 5 kOe (> Hc1 = 1.8 Oe ). Therefore, ac screening length is completely imaginary and it
reveals existence of vortex liquid state around this field.
Here we have used ac screening
response measurement
technique in transmission
geometry.
Circuit diagram
Finding of melting field at 2K from Magneto-Transport measurements
I-V characteristics
0 2 4 60
15
30
45
V (
mV
)
I (mA)
0.3 kOe
0.9 kOe
1.5 kOe
1.8 kOe
1.9 kOe
2.2 kOe
2.5 kOe
3.1 kOe
4.3 kOe
5.2 kOe
8.0 kOe
20 kOe
45 kOe
65 kOe
80 kOe
100 kOe
Notional Critical current at low field regime
0 2 4 60
10
20
30
40
50
V (
mV
)
I (mA)
Ic
1 2 3 4 50.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
I c (
mA
)H (kOe)
When Lorentz force on vortices is more than the pinning force then vortices
are in flux flow regime (large current limit) and I-V Characteristics follow
usual Bardeen-Stephen relation.I-V characteristics for I
For perfect hexagonal lattice,
ψ6 = 1
Above 70 kOe, orientational
order parameter goes to zero
and thermally activated
resistivity (ρTAFF) increases
rapidly above the same field.
Therefore hexatic to isotropic
liquid transition occurs around
field 70 kOe at 2K.
ρTAFF at different temperatures
➢ Solid to hexatic fluid phase transition are identified from the point above which
I-V curves do not fit with expected form of soild phase as well as ρTAFF becomes
finite as I goes to zero.
➢ Hexatic to isotropic liquid transition is obtained from the point where ρTAFFstarts increasing rapidly.
➢ Upper critical field is found from the point above which ρTAFF reaches its normal
state value.
Phase diagram
2 3 4 5 6 7
20
40
60
80
100 Hc2
H (
kO
e)
T (K)
Hexatic fluid
Vortex liquid
Vortex Solid
Normal state
x10
Low temperature magneto-transport measurements down to 300 mK
So
lid
Liq
uid
2 3 4 5 6 7 80.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
-2
,
-2 (
m
-2)
T (K)
BCS fit
BCS fit of penetration depth in zero
magnetic field,
λ−2 (𝑇)
λ−2(0)=∆ 𝑇
∆ 0𝑇𝑎𝑛ℎ
∆ 𝑇
𝐾𝐵𝑇
λ𝐿 0 = 534 𝑛𝑚
Observation at 2K
➢Ac screening response
measurement and Tunneling
spectroscopy reveals that Our
system is well behaved BCS like
type II superconductor.
➢All the phase transition points are
matched properly with these three
different set of measurements.
➢ Existence of hexatic fluid phase
is conformed by finding decay
length scale of orientational order
in real space of vortex lattice and
motion of vortices as well as
appearance of finite value of ρTAFFin zero current current limit.
➢Similar kind of behavior in
resistivity (at 2K) is also observed
in low temperature regime 300
mK.
➢Appearance of finite RTAFF (in low
current limit) at 300 mK suggests
hexatic fluid is quantum fluid and
we have quantum phase transition.
Future work
➢ To verify the phase transition
at low temperature (300 mk),
we need to observe temporal
dynamics of vortex lattice.
➢ Using classical BKTHNY
theory we can not explain low
temperature behavior. So, we
need Quantum analog of this
model.
References
1. Indranil Roy, Surajit Dutta,
Aditya N. Roy Choudhury,
Somak Basistha, IIaria Maccari,
Soumyajit Mandal, John
Jesudasan, Vivas Bagwe, Claudio
Castellani, Lara Benfatto, Pratap
Raychaudhuri, Melting of the
vortex lattice through
intermediate hexatic fluid in a-
MoGe thin flim,
arxiv:1805.05193 (2018).
2. Enrst Helmut Brandt,
Penetration of Magnetic ac
Fields into TypeII
Superconductor, Phys. Rev.Lett.
67,16 (1991).
3. C.J. van der Beek, V.B
Geshkenbein, V.M Vinokur,
linear and nonlinear ac
response in superconducting
mixed stated, Phys. Rev.B 48,5
(1993
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
RT
AF
F (
)
T (K)
Finite thermally activated Resistance is observed at low temperature 300 mK. Therefore this hexatic fluid is
quantum fluid.
0 20 40 60 80 1001E-6
1E-5
1E-4
1E-3
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
RT
AF
F (
)
H (kOe)
0.3 K 0.45 K
0.79 K 1.1 K
1.45 K 2.03 K
3.5 K 4.5 K
5.5 K 6.5 K
Low temperature vortex
lattice (450 mK)
10 kOe 55 kOe
70 kOe
Real space orientation order is defined as,
G6 r =< Cos 6 θ r − θ 0 >
θ r : Angle between an arbitrary fixed axis and the line connecting between two nearest neighbor located at position r.
For a perfect hexagonal lattice, G6 r = 1Hexatic fluid has quasi long range oriententional order. So, G6 r decays as power law with r (10 kOe, 25 kOe, 55 koe).For, isotropic liquid G6 r decays like exponentially (no orientational order; 70 kOe and 85 kOe).
Sudden increment in RTAFF is also appeared around 80 kOe at
low temperature. Therefore there is hexatic to isotropic liquid
transition around this point.
(η : viscous drag coefficient and 𝜔0 is intrinsic vortex lattice frequency, 𝛼𝐿 is average value of labush
parameter)
In field, complex ac screening length is
defined as, λ𝑎𝑐2 = λ𝐿
2 + λ𝑐2
λ𝐿 is London penetration depth and it’s contribution can be neglected for such low
field (λ𝐿−2 ∝ (1 −
𝐻
𝐻𝑐2)). Therefore,
λ𝑎𝑐2 ≈ λ𝑐
2 =𝐵2
𝜇0𝛼𝐿
λ𝑐 is campbell penetration depth and in the linear response regime, it is modified
as, 𝛼𝐿 → 𝛼𝐿 + 𝑖𝜔η
In Low temperature,
Orientational order
also persists up to 70
kOe with random
dislocation pairs.
0 20 40 60 80 10010
-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
T
AF
F (
-m)
H (kOe)
1.45 K
2.0 K
3.5 K
4.5 K
5.5 K
6.5 K
10 100 1000 1000010
-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-2 ,
-2 (
m
-2)
H (Oe)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
-2/
-2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
50
100
150
200
250
RT
AF
F (
)
T (K)
0 kOe
0.5 kOe
2 kOe
5 kOe
10 kOe
15 kOe
20 kOe
25 kOe
30 kOe
40 kOe
50 kOe
60 kOe
70 kOe
80 kOe
90 kOe
100 kOe