+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 000000000001010270

000000000001010270

Date post: 02-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: aoe1831
View: 221 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
120
7/27/2019 000000000001010270 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 1/120 Fifth EPRI International Conference on Maintenance Proceedings Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson Jersey City, NJ August 8–10, 2005 Maintaining the Balance Between Maintenance Costs and Plant Reliability Sponsored by EPRI’s Maintenance Management and Technology (MM&T) and Technology for Equipment Assessment and Maintenance (TEAM) Programs Hosted by: Effective December 6, 2006, this report has been made publicly available in accordan with Section 734.3(b)(3) and published in accordance with Section 734.7 of the U.S. E  Administration Regulations. As a result of this publication, this report is subject to on copyright protection and does not require any license agreement from EPRI. This no supersedes the export control restrictions and any proprietary licensed material notice embedded in the document prior to publication.
Transcript
Page 1: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 1/120

Fifth EPRI International

Conference onMaintenance Proceedings

Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the HudsonJersey City, NJAugust 8–10, 2005

Maintaining the BalanceBetween MaintenanceCosts and Plant Reliability 

Sponsored by EPRI’s Maintenance Management and Technology (MM&T) and

Technology for Equipment Assessment and Maintenance (TEAM) Programs

Hosted by:

Effective December 6, 2006, this report has been made publicly available in accordan

with Section 734.3(b)(3) and published in accordance with Section 734.7 of the U.S. E

 Administration Regulations. As a result of this publication, this report is subject to on

copyright protection and does not require any license agreement from EPRI. This no

supersedes the export control restrictions and any proprietary licensed material notice

embedded in the document prior to publication.

Page 2: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 2/120

Page 3: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 3/120

 

ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304-1395 ▪ PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303-0813 ▪ USA

800.313.3774 ▪ 650.855.2121 ▪ [email protected] ▪ www.epri.com

Fifth EPRI International Conference on

Maintenance Proceedings

Maintaining the Balance Between Maintenance Costs and Plant Reliability 

1010270

Technical Update, December 2005

EPRI Project Manager

Ray Chambers

Page 4: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 4/120

 

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OFWORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI).NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANYPERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM:

(A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITHRESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEMDISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULARPURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNEDRIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT ISSUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR

(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDINGANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISEDOF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THISDOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED INTHIS DOCUMENT.

ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

This is an EPRI Technical Update report. A Technical Update report is intended as an informal report ofcontinuing research, a meeting, or a topical study. It is not a final EPRI technical report.

NOTE

For further information about EPRI, call the EPRI Customer Assistance Center at 800.313.3774 ore-mail [email protected].

Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric PowerResearch Institute, Inc.

Copyright © 2005 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 5: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 5/120

 

CITATIONS

This document was prepared by

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

1300 W.T. Harris Blvd.Charlotte, NC 28262

Principal InvestigatorR. Chambers

This document describes research sponsored by EPRI.

This publication is a corporate document that should be cited in the literature in thefollowing manner:

Fifth EPRI International Conference on Maintenance Proceedings: Maintaining the Balance Between Maintenance Costs and Plant Reliability. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2005. 1010270.

Page 6: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 6/120

Page 7: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 7/120

 

 A A g gee n n d  d  a a 

Page 8: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 8/120

Final AgendaEPRI International Conference on Maintenance

Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson, Jersey City , NJ, USA August 8-10, 2005

Sunday, August 7, 2005

4: 00 pm-6:00 pm  Pre-Registration

Monday, August 8, 2005

7:00 am Continental Breakfast and Registration  

8:00 am Welcome, Ray Chambers, Technical Manager, Maintenance Management & Technology, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) 

8:30 am Keynote, Carl Fricker , Plant Manager, PSE&G Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station 

Plenary SessionDecision on Maintenance as a Cost Center or a Profit Center 

Session Chairperson – Ray Chambers, EPRI

9:00 am Establishing a Fleet Approach for Equipment Reliability, James Stanley, David Sonnett, ConstellationGeneration Group 

9:30 am  The Business Case for Reliability, John Schulz, Allied Services Group, Inc. 

10:00 am Break

10:30 am Surprises are not Acceptable, Peter Hessler, Construction Business Associates LLC 

11:15 am Reliability Centered Leadership, Terrence O’Hanlon, Reliabilityweb.com 

12:00 pm Lunch

Improvements in Fossil Maintenance TechnologiesSession Chair – George Van Der Horn, Innovative

Maintenance Solutions, Inc.

Improvements in Nuclear MaintenanceTechnologies

Session Chair – Joe Curley, The Accuro Group, Inc.

1:15 pm Advanced Erosion Protection Technology ProvidesSustained Burner Performance and Reliability,Chris Harley, Conforma Clad; Douglas Goebel,Michael Sarri, We Energies; Corby Valentine,Dynegy; Bonnie Courtemanche, Riley Power Inc.

Experience with Mid-Wall Weld Repairs forPressurizer Heater Sleeves, Pedro Amador, JimPuzan, Welding Services Inc.; Michael Lashley,Dick Mattson, Structural Integrity Associates 

1:45 pm  Yates Meter, Michael Mancini, HydroAire ServiceIncorporated 

Advanced Pipe Replacement Procedure for aDefective CRDM Housing Nozzle Enables Continued

Normal Operation of a Nuclear Power Plant, Jerker Stötsberg , UDDCOMB Engineering Helsingborg AB(Sweden); Geoff Gilmore, Ph.D., Climax PortableMachine Tools, Inc.

2:30 pm Break

3:00 pm Case Studies of Quantitative Acoustic EmissionNon-Destructive Inspection Method in PowerIndustry, B. Muravin, G. Muravin, L. Lezvinsky,Margan Physical Diagnostics Ltd. (Israel);Presented by Dan Ezra, Margan, Inc. 

Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Cobalt Reduction PlanUpdate, John Underwood, Tennessee Valley

 Authority (Browns Ferry) 

3:30 pm SiEMPre: A Step Forward in PredictiveMaintenance, Daniel Bri ff , Central Termoeléctrica

Genelba 

Update on Preemptive Weld Overlay (PWOL)Activities, Pete Riccardella, Robert Hermann,

Structural Integrity Associates; Greg Frederick, ArtiePeterson, Jr ., Electric Power Research Institute(EPRI); Presented by Jim Puzan, Welding ServicesInc 

4:00 pm Using Real Time Temperature, Stress and FlowReadings to Determine Equipment Damage,Maintenance Costs and Operational Strategy inPower Plants, Steven Lefton, Phillip Besuner,Dwight Agan, Jeffrey Grover , APTECHEngineering Services, Inc. 

Past Operability Assessment of TDAGWP due to Turbine Bearing Oil Orifice Feed Plug by Debris,Mammar Maghraoui, Tahsin Dogan, Michael Kelly,Joseph Spencer , Framatome ANP, Inc.; Roger Wink, Wade Claspil l, AmerenUE (Callaway Plant) 

5 - 8:00 pm Exhibits Open and Reception

Page 9: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 9/120

Final AgendaEPRI International Conference on Maintenance

Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson, Jersey City , NJ, USA August 8-10, 2005

Tuesday, August 9, 2005

7:00 am Continental Breakfast

Current Issues in Fossil Processes and Financial MethodsSession Chair – George Van Der Horn, Innovative

Maintenance Solutions, Inc. 

Cost and Reliability Techniques for Nuclear Power Session Chair – Joe Curley, The Accuro Group, Inc.

8:00 am Fossil P lant Maintenance – An OperationsPerspective, Wayne Crawford, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) 

Equipment Reliability Process – A Case Study of aNorth American Nuclear Generating Station, SandraDiMatteo, Ivara Corporation 

8:30 am  Transformation to Knowledge Based Maintenance:Challenges of Change Management in a LargePower Utility, Mr. S.C. Deo Sharma, PankajBhartiya, Anil Mittal, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (India); Patrick Abbott,EPRIsolutions. 

Laser Scanning Offers Significant Benefits for thePower Market, Eric Hale, Quantapoint, Inc. 

9:00 am Automating the PM Template and MaintenanceStrategy Development Process at ConEdison, MattWalther , Consolidated Edison Co. of New York,Inc.; Evan Niemkiewicz, Insert Key Solutions 

Writing and Implementing Packing Procedures –Lessons Learned, Ron Frisard, AW Chesterton 

9:30 am Gray Water Cooling in Surface Condensers and HeatExchangers – Trend or Aberration, DennisSchumerth, VALTIMET, Inc. 

10:00 am Break

Current Issues in Fossil Processes and Financial MethodsSession Chair – George Van Der Horn, Innovative

Maintenance Solutions, Inc. 

Cost and Reliability Techniques for Nuclear Power Session Chair – Joe Curley, The Accuro Group, Inc.

10:30 am New Business Model for Leveraging TechnologicalAdvancements to Achieve the Market DeterminedPrice for Power Ageing Power Plants, D.S. Sharma,

C. Subramaniam, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (India) 

PM Database Web Version, Marty Br idges, ElectricPower Research Institute (EPRI) 

11:00 am Condition Based Maintenance PlantViewKnowledge Management, Paul Gwizdala, DTEEnergy; George Lum, Southern Company 

Where has all the “Tribal Knowledge” Gone?, MarkGoodman, UE Systems, Inc. 

11:30am Value Engineering: Strategy for IncreasingPerformance and Reducing Costs in Utilities, A.K.Tripathi, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd(India) 

Issue Gathering on Recent CMMS Installations,Marty Br idges, Electric Power Research Institute(EPRI) 

12:00 pm Lunch & Exhibits

Maintenance Strategies on Equipment Reliabili tySession Chair – Marty Bridges, EPRI 

1:30 pm Using Risk Informed Maintenance Strategies for High Voltage Networks, Paul Hendrix, MaintControl

International (The Netherlands); Edward Abbott, ABZ, Inc. 

2:00 pm Low-Cost SF6Gas Monitor, George Rhodes, Tristan Fin, Avistar, Inc. 

2:30 pm On-Line and Off-Line Testing as Part of a Predictive Maintenance Program, Timothy Thomas, Baker Instrument Company 

3:00 pm Break

3:30 pm Increased Productivity, Reliability and Accuracy at Lower Cost: Applying the Proven Benefits of ElectronicPerformance Support Technology to Power Plant Maintenance, Roger LaPlante, Anna Liisa VanMantgem, REI Systems, Inc. 

Page 10: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 10/120

Final AgendaEPRI International Conference on Maintenance

Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson, Jersey City , NJ, USA August 8-10, 2005

4:00 pm Equipment Condition Assessment, Brandon Rasmussen, EPRI I&C Center; Presented by RameshShankar , Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) 

4:30 pm Internal Pipe Seals for Repair of Cooling Water Piping and Expansion Joints, Peter Blais, PE, LeoNadeau, Hunting Pipeline Services 

5:00 pm Identifying Motor Defects Through the Six Fault Zones, David McKinnon, PdMA Corporation 

5:00 pm Adjourn

Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:00 am Continental Breakfast

Bridging the Gap in Maintenance WorkforceSession Chairperson – Marty Bridges, EPRI

8:00 am Use of the ORSIM Model for Improvement of Nuclear Power Plant Operations,Michael Golay,Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 

8:30 am EPRI Looks to Broaden the Reach of Task Proficiency Evaluation (TPE) Program,Ken Huffman, ElectricPower Research Institute (EPRI) 

9:00 am

Maintenance Excellence Program: Capturing Knowledge to Train a Replacement, Bernie Cook, ProgressEnergy; Joe Mosteller , PSEG Power  

9:30 am Business / Education Partnerships – Solution for the future of the Aging Energy Industry Workforce,DanaDeYoung, PSEG Power  

10:00 am Break

Panel Session

Workforce Transition Techniques and SolutionsSession Chairperson – Ray Chambers, EPRI

11:45 am Wrap-Up– Ray Chambers, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) 

12:00 pm  Adj ourn

Page 11: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 11/120

 

 A A b b s s t t r r a a c c t t s s 

Page 12: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 12/120

 

 P Pl l ee n n a a r r y y SSee s s s sii o o n n  D Dee c cii s sii o o n n o o n n M  M  a aii n n t tee n n a a n n c cee a a s s a a C C  o o s s t t 

C C ee n n t tee r r o o r r a a P P r r o o f  f ii t t C C ee n n t tee r r 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  p peer r ssoonn 

R R aayy CChhaamm b beer r ss,, EEPPR R II 

GGeenneer r aall SSeessssiioonn 

MMoonnd d aayy,, 99::0000 aamm ttoo 1122::0000 nnoooonn 

Page 13: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 13/120

ESTABLISHING A FLEET APPROACH FOR EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY 

James J. Stanley, Manager, Corporate Engineering

David E. Sonnett, Technical Consultant

Constellation Generation Group

 ABSTRACT

INPO AP-913, “Equipment Reliability Process Description”, states one objective of an

equipment reliability program is to establish uniform processes among all plants in anorganization. In the last few years, Constellation Generation Group has acquired 

substantial generating stations, increasing generation capacity to 12,000 MW, with 107

generating units at 35 locations. This includes 5 very different and diverse nuclear plants.With this increase, sufficient nucleus was available to justify establishing a dedicated 

corporate engineering group, with one of the primary goals being to satisfy the AP-913

objective for process uniformity. This paper will present the Constellation Generation

Group’s Corporate Engineering organization, including core value, focus, role, structure,

approach, and accomplishments.

The core value of CGG Corporate Engineering is to improve fleet performance,capturing synergies and leveraging scale.

Our initial primary focus is equipment reliability for CGG’s nuclear fleet, with voluntaryfossil fleet participation in elements that are common to all generating units.

Our initial role is to provide governance with oversight in standardization of programs, policies and implementing best practices across the fleet.

The Corporate Engineering core organization is composed of seasoned experts with CGG

and other utility fleet experience in developing and managing major elements of 

equipment reliability programs. Matrixed to this core organization are Equipment

Reliability Program owners at each site, Technical Subject Matter Experts from our  plants and other organizations, and Strategic Alliance Industry Partners.

Our approach is to benchmark industry best practices, identify gaps and shortfalls,

 prioritize areas identified for improvement, and engage our sites for input and support todevelop and implement the improvements. Our goal is to achieve results, as opposed to

 process adherence. Areas where we are making substantial progress include component

classification, PM templates, single point vulnerability, troubleshooting, performancemonitoring, health reporting, prioritization, performance indicators, and equipment

reliability software support.

Engagement and communications between Corporate Engineering and our fleet have been enhanced by daily O&M Fleet Conferences, periodic Peer Group and Management

Review Meetings, and Challenge Board and Assessment participation.

This paper will present the accomplishments of the CGG Corporate Engineering

organization to date, some difficulties experienced, and some expected future direction.

Page 14: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 14/120

 

NOTES

Page 15: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 15/120

THE BUSINESS CASE FOR RELIABILITY

John Schultz - Allied Services Group, Inc.

ABSTRACT

“It’s OK to get Excited about Maintenance”  is the introduction we use for every presentationwe give related to maintenance, reliability, and asset management. The reason for this is the

overwhelming business case associated with doing maintenance and reliability right. Asset

Management initiatives have been documented to have Returns on Investment (ROI) ranging

from 4:1 to 50:1. In fact, many organizations have found that a Total Equipment Asset

Management (TEAM) initiative has proven to be the best investment that they have ever made intheir facility. In this paper we will discuss and explore the “Business Case for Reliability” from

several different angles:

1.  What is ROI?

2.  What are the elements of a successful TEAM initiative?3.  What are the typical costs associated with each element?

4.  Where are these costs offset with savings?

5.  What areas can expect to see the most significant savings?

6.  What types of saving are likely in each area?

7.  What is the “typical” Rate of Return (ROR)

8.  What elements control ROR?

9.  Where do you start?

Readers will gain a fundamental understanding of why a Reliability initiative makes financial

sense for their business, what elements are essential for their success, what they can control, and 

how to start. If a plant already has a reliability initiative in place, but the results are not meeting

expectations, calculating the business case may provide insight into why results are not beingachieved.

Page 16: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 16/120

 

NOTES

Page 17: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 17/120

Surprises Are Not Acceptable

To be successful, power plant outages require excellence inproject management and project controls

 ABSTRACTOutages are tough to master. It is inevitable that they will not follow a scripted plan and there willlikely be many changes. There will be changes to personnel, scope, material schedules andbudgets. Quality and safety issues will create diversions that were never envisioned. However,none of this is new; these challenges have always been there. What is new is the demand tomanage these changes on behalf of the stakeholders - they do not want surprises! 

So often, once the site work starts, it seems to take on a life of its own. Suddenly, themeticulously planned schedule bears little resemblance to what is actually happening on the job.Budgets are revised and scopes are readjusted, and the immovable start-up date looms closerand closer. Chaos sets in. But it doesn’t have to be this way.

 Today, outages must be diligently managed and they must be proactively controlled - there’s a lotof money at stake. J ohn T. Long, Constellation Energy’s senior vice president for powergeneration, puts it this way: “The ability to accurately track project financial commitments as wellas physical completion is critical in today’s world. Surprises are not acceptable. In this competitiveenvironment, we must plan for them and be prepared for anything. The successful powergenerators are those that can consistently meet and beat their forecasted earnings. Excellence inproject management and project controls is vital to achieving those goals.”

A set of good management tools, and the ability to use them, is the key. They can be used tointervene when costs head in the wrong direction and they can be used to manage the outage.

 This paper discusses those tools and how their use can help avoid the surprises that are nolonger acceptable.

 Author Bio

Peter Hessler is the president of Construction Business Associates LLC, a provider of businessmanagement services to the power plant construction industry. He has almost 30 years of experience in managing the field construction of power plant outages and new plant work. Mr.Hessler is a graduate of Virginia Tech and an author of numerous papers on the subject of construction management. He has written a book on the economics of power plant construction,to be published by PennWell Corp. in the summer of 2005. Peter can be contacted [email protected].

Page 18: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 18/120

 

NOTES

Page 19: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 19/120

Towards the fundamental business of maintenance – some key issues

Ulf Sandberg, Ph D Johan Blomqvist, MSc and [email protected]   [email protected]

 Telephone +46 303 66 189, Telefax +46 303 66 160

Vattenfall AB, ServicesS-444 87 Stenungsund, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Maintenance is a prerequisite for high enough utilization of physical assets for energy production,transmission, and distribution, low enough spending over time, and long enough life lengths (and tosome extent even high enough residual values) of our energy systems. Maintenance is performed inorder to uphold the properties and functions of a physical asset and to assure availability and capacityto perform at its specifications – simply to be able to use the physical assets as intended.

Technical lifetimes of energy systems (or parts of them) are long. In some cases hundreds of years.

Values are great. The effects from, for example, decisions to shift in maintenance investment levelsnormally show up several years ahead and our kind of businesses offers a unique trade-off opportunity between short and long-term profits.

Many of us seek the optimum levels of maintenance spending. The deregulation and privatization erahas created a strong pressure to improve RONA and other short-term accounting based measures, and 

in many energy companies, maintenance has been the instrument to reach desired targets, since marketstend to be stiff.

In this paper, some important elements for design and steering of maintenance of physical assets will be discussed based on experiences from an ongoing attempt to increase the efficiency of maintenance processes within the Vattenfall group. The experiences cover four countries and many more performance cultures. Basic business fundamentals will be exemplified and their inherent coupling and 

effect on customer-supplier relationships as well as end-customers discussed around three themes:

The correct economic footprint of maintenanceToday, the maintenance strategical, tactical, and operative processes are spilt up in and in between

organisations. The focus on maintenance spending often only incorporate the operative part (the currentcosts), but the prerequisites for operative work are a result of the performance of the two former  processes. What is included as maintenance costs also differ since organisations rather arbitrarilychoose what could be capitalized, and what to regard as maintenance activities. In addition to this fuzzy

 picture of the resource consumption the capitalized part is normally not considered maintenance but“reinvestments”, “renewals”, and similar.

What are the maintenance design parameters?The end-customer focus and influence is still not fully developed in many energy companies. The

former business conditions have created a culture where what is acceptable not is determined by business offers, but from the general consensus among energy companies. Upon that, the uncertaintyaround what will be important seen from regulators and other stakeholders views, a “wait and see”

attitude develop instead of business based actions trying to develop the necessary work and processesneeded.

The need for better long-term steeringIn order to optimize profit levels over time today’s short-term financial targets, expressed as return

on net assets (or similar ones), should be balanced off with a more “long-term measure and target”reaching beyond business plan horizons.. A good achievement in maintenance should be to maximizethe value of the expected total discounted cash-flows and hence keeping the value of the assets at

reasonable levels. In the paper, some alternative approaches are discussed and compared.

Ver March 14 2005 1.3

Page 20: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 20/120

 

NOTES

Page 21: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 21/120

 

Reliabili ty Centered Leadership  Terrence O'Hanlon

Reliabilityweb.com

PO Box 07070Fort Myers FL 33919

Tel: 239.985.0317 Ext 111Fax 309.423.7234

[email protected] 

 ABSTRACTPresenter: Terrence O'Hanlon, Certified Maintenance and Reliability Professional Publisher of RELIABILITY®Magazine and Reliabilityweb.comDirector of Strategic Alliances for the Society of Maintenance & Reliability Professionals (SMRP) 

For the past 27 years, maintenance & reliability management strategies, techniques andtechnologies have become very well defined and are more process based than ever. There areno secrets as to the elements that are included in Tier 1 or World Class Maintenance. Somecompanies use pyramids to represent Maintenance Excellence, others use an arch and othersuse block diagrams. If we already know what elements we need for effective maintenance whydon’t we all simply enjoy high levels of plant reliability? 

In my work, I have the privilege to communicate with a large number of maintenance andreliability professionals from around the world. Many of them are involved with some type of maintenance improvement program. Some of these programs get implemented and have verypositive effects on company operations. More often I hear of others that seem to get stuck, fail togain acceptance and momentum and eventually fade away under the category of another“corporate program d’jour” or “flavor of the month”. Some companies make a few of the

improvements stick and are doing well but sense they could be doing things much better. Whydo some programs succeed and other fail?

A New KPI 

 This paper will explore a a new Key Performance Indicator (KPI) or Maintenance Metric, a definiteleading edge indicator to predict the health of almost any maintenance organization and thelikelihood that new improvement programs will take hold. It is called the Reliability LeadershipIndex or RLI. 

Page 22: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 22/120

 

NOTES

Page 23: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 23/120

 

 I  I  m m p p r r o ovvee m mee n n t t s s ii n n F F o o s s s siil l M  M  a aii n n t tee n n a a n n c cee 

T T ee c c h h n n o ol l  o o g giiee s s 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  

JJooee CCuur r lleeyy,, EEPPR R II 

MMoonnd d aayy,, 11::0000 p pmm -- 55::0000 p pmm 

Page 24: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 24/120

Advanced Erosion Protection Technology Provides Sustained Burner

Performance and Reliability

Chris Harley

Senior Applications Engineer 

Conforma Clad Inc.501 Park East Blvd.; New Albany, IN 47150

Douglas Goebel

Engineer, We Energies

333 West Everett Street; Milwaukee, WI 53203

Michael Sarri

Senior Mechanical Engineer 

We Energies2701 Lake Shore Blvd.; North, Marquette, MI

Dave Weber 

Sr. Metallurgist, Dynegy

1 Chessen Lane; Alton IL 62002

 

Bonnie Courtemanche, P.E.

Senior Engineer; Riley Power Inc.

5 Neponset St.; Worcester, MA 01615

 

 Abstract

After a coal-fired electric power generator invests in NOx reduction technologies toachieve conformance, it is faced with maintaining the equipment to ensure that the NO x rates remain within specified tolerances. Pulverized coal traveling at high velocities

through coal burners and burner tips typically produces significant component erosion,

causing owners to repeatedly replace internal components, make operation adjustmentsand even replace entire burner assemblies. During the period between repairs, changes in

 burner geometry caused by excessive erosion can impact combustion characteristics,

resulting in upward trending NOx emissions.

The most advanced Low NOx burner technologies utilize erosion-resistant materials to

 protect against wear, in an attempt to increase burner geometry retention and maintaincombustion characteristics for sustained low NO

xperformance. This paper will discuss

an exhaustive laboratory analysis to evaluate erosion protection solutions for this extreme

application. Tests per ASTM G73 method, utilizing Black Beauty Coal Slag as the

erodent material, were performed on commonly used wear resistant materials: Stoody101, SA1750 CR, Conforma Clad WC219, Stellite 31, Stellite 6, A560 Grade 50Cr-50Ni,

A532-82 Type 2 class C, A532 type 1 class A and Silicon Carbide. In addition to the

qualification of the lab tests, this paper will discuss actual field test results comparingwear resistant materials on components subjected to the high-erosion environment of 

 burners and similar applications.

The combination of sophisticated burner designs and the utilization of the highesterosion-resistant materials ensure homogenous, non-turbulent coal mixing and 

maintenance of controlled burn rates over extended periods of operation. Retaining thegeometries of the advanced burner technologies will not only test low at initial start-up,

 but can be expected to remain low throughout the majority of burner life, between major outages. The net result of geometry retention through erosion resistance is prolonged 

compliance with NOx emissions with a reduced risk of unplanned downtime, as well asan increase in overall unit productivity, predictability and reliability.

Page 25: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 25/120

 

NOTES

Page 26: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 26/120

 Recovery of Missing Process Data Using Auto-Associative

Neural Networks

Lungile Mdlazi and Tshilidzi Marwala

School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of theWitwatersrand, P/Bag 3, Wits, 2050, South Africa, E-mail:

[email protected] 

 Abst ract

 This paper introduces a method for recovering lost process data using auto-associative neural

networks. In auto-associative neural networks, the neural networks are trained to recall the inputdata. In this paper an error equation with missing inputs as design variables is constructed fromthe trained network. A genetic algorithm is then used to solve for the missing input data entries.

 The proposed method is tested on prediction of missing data from a process monitoring system of a power generation plant. On prior tests conducted by Marwala and Mdlazi on a faultclassification in the presence of missing data, it was found that the method used in this paper wasable to estimate missing data entries to an average accuracy of 92.5%. It is therefore postulatedthat the method should yield similar results in the recovery of lost process data. This method willassist in the incident investigation in cases where some of the sensors have malfunctions and thedata has been lost.

Page 27: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 27/120

 

NOTES

Page 28: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 28/120

FIELD TESTING USING THE THERMODYNAMIC METHOD

IAN WATSON

HYDROAIRE ENGINEERING SERVICES

834 W MADISON,

CHICAGO, IL 60607

 Abstract

 The Yates meter is a testing device that was designed and perfected in the UnitedKingdom in 1983. The Yates meter has completed several rigorous design reviews byinternational accreditation agencies, such as ISO, BS, NEL & SIRA, to ensure that theservices we offer are of the highest caliber. To date, the Yates Meter has been utilizedin over 6,000 pump tests to various markets including fossil power, nuclear power,refinery, pipeline, steel, and water/wastewater.

 The Yates Meter employs a thermodynamic testing technique that relies on measuringvery small increases in the pumped fluid temperature as it passes through the pump.

 The Yates Meter process requires measurement of suction and discharge temperatureand pressure and motor power. No measurement of flow is required. The Yates Metercan be used to test nearly the full gamut of centrifugal pump configurations and sizes.

 The Yates Meter has many advantages over conventional test methods that rely on theaccurate measurement of flow. These advantages include ease of preparation, limitedpipe-work constraints and highly accurate and repeatable results with little or nointerference in the day to day operation of the pumps. The accuracy of the Yates Meteris documented to be up to 10 times more accurate than any conventional test method.

 The most common customer benefit derived from utilizing the Yates Meter is asignificant reduction in their energy cost. This is achieved by accurately measuringpump efficiency, calculating operating flow and horsepower, and comparing this data towhat would be the minimum energy usage if the pump were operating at its best

efficiency point (BEP) at the maximum efficiency for its specific speed design. Inaddition, continuous monitoring of customer installations having multiple pumping unitswill yield significant energy savings by identifying the optimum operating schedule of theindividual paralleling pumps.

 The Yates Meter can also be used for performance based monitoring to effectivelyreduce O&M costs by trending pump inefficiency, thus allowing proper scheduling of pump refurbishment and avoiding catastrophic failure.

Some customers require accurate flow and head measurements when either validatingthat the pumping application is delivering minimum acceptable performance or when up-rating plant output.

 The simplicity of the testing method and the elimination of flow measurementaccelerates the testing process over conventional methods. Speed saves significantdollars to customers when associated with downtime (forced or planned outages), orimproved safety considerations when dealing in hazardous environments (such as highlycontaminated nuclear applications – ALARA).

Finally, the Yates Meter is wholly owned by Hydro-Yates, Inc. The customer receivesnot only test data, but also the analysis and reporting befitting a total pump servicescompany having the experience, empirical data, and pump-specific engineeringexcellence to provide solutions for maximum benefit.

Page 29: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 29/120

 

NOTES

Page 30: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 30/120

CASE STUDIES OF QUANTITATIVE ACOUSTIC EMISSION NON-

DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION METHOD IN POWER INDUSTRY

B. Muravin, G. Muravin, L. LezvinskyMargan Physical Diagnostics Ltd., P.O.B. 8155 Netanya 42160, Israel

 Tel: +972-9-8655510, Fax: +972-9-8655514, E-mail: [email protected] 

 ABSTRACT

Aging of fossil power stations dictates increasing need in routine inspectionsof high energy piping and other systems of power plants. A number of non-destructive inspection (NDI) methods were developed for this purposeincluding different ultrasonic, magnetic particles, X-ray and replicationmethods. Although these methods are effectively applied for inspections, stillthere are multiple technological and economical limitations. Hence in manycountries of the world more and more utilities start to use Quantitative

Acoustic Emission (QAE) NDI method which allows global, overall inspectionof structures, detection of different flaws at early stages of their developmentand monitoring of revealed flaws.

In this article we present several case studies of QAE NDI method in powerindustry. This includes confirmation of QAE NDI findings (creep at differentstages, fatigue cracks, stress corrosion cracking, systems of inclusions andother flaws) by conventional NDI methods and metallurgical investigations. Iaddition we present the capability of revealing of non-uniform dynamic stressdistribution in the piping due to mal-performing hangers and supports.

Page 31: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 31/120

 

NOTES

Page 32: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 32/120

SiEMPre: A Step Forward in Predictive Maintenance

José Luis Secchi

I&C Maintenance Supervisor 

Central Termoeléctrica GenelbaPetrobras Energía

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Daniel Briff 

I&C and Electrical Maintenance Chief 

Central Termoeléctrica GenelbaPetrobras Energía

Buenos Aires, Argentina

 ABSTRACT

SiEMPre: (In Spanish Always). Acronym for Expert System for Predictive Maintenance

This work presents a powerful tool called SiEMPre, software developed and implemented by Genelba

Combined Cycle Power plant maintenance staff, intended for management optimization of plant assets.

Actually it is considered that the most efficient way for maintenance asset management is achieved 

through continuous monitoring and by intensive use of predictive maintenance techniques. Diagnosticsoftware SiEMPre is a tailor made tool that proposes a step forward in the evolution of these types of 

Maintenance strategies.

The Idea that enforces SiEMPre development is to convert a big amount of available data into valuable

information to take decisions referred to equipment condition assessment, all this information collected in

a unique platform that takes data from different sources, as operating tracking data, Control systemcontrol database, Performance monitoring software stand alone equipment, and so on.

SiEMPre systematizes predictive and condition strategies, helping to find the most efficient time to

 perform tasks, reducing unplanned or corrective maintenance, and producing an early warning when

abnormalities are being developed in a phase where corrective actions impact is minimized, added with a

valuable estimate defect root cause, all of this done through a continuous monitoring of field magnitudes,

A key aspect is to take advantage of maintenance staff experience and knowledge on finding defects, by

evolving it into mathematical models that are incorporated as modules into the program.The evolution is given by the determination of equipment status in real time, because the concept for this

tool is always –SiEMPre- in service, with a model developed accordingly to plant service characteristics

required for every equipment involved.

Utilization results in various benefits, as to say:

♦  Increase in plant availability.

♦  Reduction of maintenance costs.

♦  Decrease forced outages.

♦  Life extension of consumables/ reduction on warehouse costs.

♦  Detection of abnormalities not considered by Control System warnings and alarms,

♦  Development of new abilities in maintenance experts

♦  Centralized monitoring of plant assets♦  Knowledge distributed as a new active of the company

Analysis modules include gas turbine instrument monitoring (vibration, temperature, pressure), control

valves loops, pneumatic valves functioning, analytical parameters, electrical magnitudes and all

instruments used to measure combined cycle efficiency.

Page 33: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 33/120

 

NOTES

Page 34: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 34/120

Using Real Time Temperature, Stress, and Flow Readings to Determine Equipment

Damage, Maintenance Costs and Operational Strategy in Power Plants

By Steven A. Lefton, Phillip M. Besuner, Dwight Agan and Jeffery L. Grover 

This paper will discuss the concepts and some technical details of a real-time cost and damage computer program COSTCOM that is designed to calculate total power plants

maintenance costs. APTECH Engineering Services has developed and used COSTCOM

for COST Control of O perations and Maintenance. The program examines key readingsof temperatures, stresses, and flow rates for all major power plant subsystems and 

components. Then it computes and accounts for the interaction of (a) cyclic damage from

transient operations and (b) creep damage from base loaded steady state operations. The program obtains data directly from the plant data acquisition system. It then displays in

real time some 13 to 15 key operational parameters including steam and metal

temperatures, turbine shell temperatures, flows etc. For these parameters, both values and 

rates of change (ramp rates) are displayed. The Costcom display gives operators guidance

for all types of starts, shutdowns, and load following transients on all these keytemperatures, pressures, MW rates of change, flows and on resultant probable future

maintenance costs. A unique display of 13 to 15 “thermometers” use color bars toindicate normal, cautionary, and alarming values of reading values and ramp rates. These

key parameters have been correlated to boiler and turbine stress levels, damage, and then

calibrated to past maintenance costs. The COSTCOM code is in operation at a large800MW gas and oil peaking conventional steam unit and it is critical in deterring

improper operation, equipment damage and improving start up/shut down strategy based 

on economic dispatch that includes Aptech’s estimates of cycling costs. The program has been used to demonstrate the effect of ramp rates on stresses and damage/costs as

discussed in the recent EPRI report on the “Effects of Flexible Operations on Turbinesand Generators.” Informing operators about probable future maintenance costs as a result

of real time operation is a key educational element to operate power plants at low cost.

Page 35: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 35/120

 

NOTES

Page 36: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 36/120

 

 I  I  m m p p r r o ovvee m mee n n t t s s ii n n N  N uu c cl l ee a a r r M  M  a aii n n t tee n n a a n n c cee 

T T ee c c h h n n o ol l  o o g giiee s s 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  

GGeeoor r ggee VVaannDDeer r HHoor r nn,, EEPPR R II 

MMoonnd d aayy,, 11::0000 p pmm -- 55::0000 p pmm 

Page 37: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 37/120

 

Experience with Mid-Wall Weld Repairs for Pressurizer Heater

Sleeves

Pedro Amador, Welding Services Inc.

Jim Puzan, Welding Services Inc.

Michael Lashley, Structural Integrity Associates

Dick Mattson, Structural Integrity Associates

 Abstract

After the completion of 99 half nozzle pad repairs in the refurbishment of three (3) CombustionEngineering-designed pressurizers in 2003-04, the team of Welding Services Inc. (WSI) and 

Structural Integrity Associates (SI) continued their support of pressurizer heater sleeve repairs in

Spring 2005 using the new half nozzle mid-wall repair. The industry’s first repair occurred at

Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Unit 2 on an emergent basis in March 2005. At the time of thiswriting, WSI and SI are making final preparations to complete half nozzle repairs on 29 heater 

sleeves at Waterford-3 using this same mid-wall weld repair approach. The schedule window

 planned for the Waterford-3 repair project is approximately 20 days. A significant reduction indose over that associated with half nozzle pad repairs, which typically require a schedule of 30

days or more, is anticipated.

The completed ANO-2 repair and the planned Waterford-3 project are the culmination of a

development program completed by WSI, SI, Entergy and Arizona Public Service to support

mid-wall repairs of CE-plant heater sleeves. The program involved development of an array of tools and procedures to implement the repair. This included remote welding equipment and 

 procedures to complete the mid-wall weld without ‘triple-point’ root defects. In addition, the program addressed mechanical tooling that was provided to ensure alignment of the repair (required for heater reinstallation) as well as tools required for NDE (PT and UT) to document

weld quality in the field. The development program also included design and licensing activities

required to obtain NRC approval of the repair.

This presentation will review the mid-wall repair technology, including the toolset, the

 procedures, the licensing process and the results of its first applications at ANO-2 and 

Waterford-3. The presentation will also present lessons-learned, including tooling and  procedure modifications to be implemented for planned pressurizer refurbishment applications

coming up in the near future. Lastly, the presentation will summarize other potential

applications for mid-wall repair technology including bottom mounted instrument penetrations(BMIPs).

Page 38: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 38/120

 

NOTES

Page 39: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 39/120

 Advanced Pipe Replacement Procedure for a Defective CRDMHousing Nozzle Enables Continued Normal Operation of a Nuclear 

Power Plant

Stefan Hansson, Senior Project Engineer, UDDCOMB Engineering, AB, Helsingborg, SwedenGeoff Gilmore Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc.,

 Newberg, OR USA

Stefan Hansson

Senior Project Engineer 

UDDCOMB Engineering Helsingborg AB

Box 22335

SE-250 25 Helsingborg

SWEDEN

Telephone: +46 (0) 42 25 66 80

FAX: +46 (0) 42 16 17 10

E-Mail: [email protected]

 

Geoff Gilmore Ph.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc.

2712 E. Second St.

 Newberg, OR 97132

USA

Telephone: 503-538-2185

FAX: 503-538-7600

E-Mail: [email protected] 

 AbstractWhile conducting a non-destructive examination (NDE) during a 2003 outage at the Ringhals Nuclear 

Power Plant in Sweden, a leak was found in the vicinity of a Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM)

housing nozzle at Unit 1. The leak in the nozzle was found approximately 20 mm from the welded 

 joint between the attaching SCRAM pipe and the nozzle. In order to obtain approval of the Swedish

 Nuclear Power Inspectorate to re-start the reactor, the affected piece of pipe i.e. the nozzle and pipe

ends had to be replaced by a new section.

The SCRAM piping system consists of a large number of SCRAM pipes, each welded to a CRDM

housing nozzle. Due to the large number of CRDM housings and SCRAM pipes, accessibility was

very limited. Since an NDE of all CRDM nozzles was scheduled during the following outage, the risk of encountering leaks in other nozzles could not be ruled out. For this reason the new, unique repair 

system developed for the pipe replacement, needed to be flexible and somewhat generic. It was critical

that the repair solution could be applied to the least accessible nozzle position to avoid a complex and 

risky dismantling of the CRDM housing.

Based on the ALARA principle for radioactive contamination, a new, unique repair process was

developed. The repair system includes utilization of custom made, remotely controlled GTAW-robots,

a specialized CNC cutting and finishing machine, snake-arm robots as well as NDE equipment.

The success of the repair solution was based on performing the machining and welding operations

from the inside of the SCRAM pipe (ID 33.4 mm) through the CRDM housing (ID 160 mm) since

accessibility from the outside was extremely limited. Depending on the position of the nozzle to berepaired, manipulators, consisting of either snake-arm robots or mechanical gripping tools, were

utilized to provide cameras, cutters etc. from the outside. The robots were also used to deliver the

replacement pipe and to perform tack welding in order to keep the replacement pipe in place while

welding from the inside.

Before the actual pipe replacement procedure was performed, comprehensive training programs were

conducted. The training was followed by certification of the equipment, staff and procedures during a

number of qualification tests in a full scale mock-up of the housing nozzle. Due to the ingenuity of the

overall repair solution and to the comprehensive training programs, the actual pipe replacement

 procedure was completed during the 2004 outage in less than half the anticipated time. As a result of 

the successful pipe replacement, the nuclear power plant was returned to normal operation.

 

Page 40: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 40/120

 

NOTES

Page 41: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 41/120

Browns Ferry Unit 1 RestartCobalt Reduction Plan Update

John Underwood 

Chemistry Supervisor BFN-TVA

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Phone: 256-614-6277

 [email protected]

 ABSTRACT 

Overview

Review of Unit 1 recovery and restart valve replacements, showed that cobalt reduction was not being

actively pursued.

A Level B PER was initiated and a HIT was formed to improve the process on Unit 1.

Units 2 and 3 also have a standing PER for increase of source term.

EPRI and INPO were contacted to provide Industry experience in cobalt reduction.

Hatch, Fermi, Quad Cities, and Limerick were identified as industry leaders in Cobalt reduction

efforts.

Plant Hatch cobalt reduction project manager provided a presentation to the HIT on their 

successful effort in the 1990’s.

Using industry benchmarking, an overall cobalt reduction plan was developed and is beingimplemented.

EPRI critique indicates that BFN1 plan is comprehensive and aggressive.

Page 42: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 42/120

 

NOTES

Page 43: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 43/120

 

Update on Preemptive Weld Overlay (PWOL) Activities

Pete Riccardella, Structural Integrity Associates

Robert Hermann, Structural Integrity Associates

Greg Frederick, EPRI

Artie Peterson, Jr., EPRI

Luis Yepez, Welding Services Inc.

 Abstract

In February 2005, EPRI contracted the team of Structural Integrity Associates (SI) and Welding

Services Inc. (WSI) to complete activities in support of Preemptive Weld Overlay (PWOL)

licensing. PWOL is one of several PWSCC-mitigation measures available for the mitigation of PWSCC in Alloy 600 butt welds in PWRs. This initial contract, funded by the EPRI Materials

Reliability Program (MRP), requires the performance of finite element analysis (FEA) to

determine the residual stresses induced by weld overlay in a configuration representative of a pressurizer surge-line nozzle. In addition, the project includes the design and fabrication of a

simulated surge-line nozzle mock-up that is subsequently overlaid with Alloy 52MS weld filler 

metal based on a specified PWOL design. The overlaid mock-up will be evaluated for axial and radial shrinkage and chemistry (i.e., Chromium content). In addition, residual stress

measurements will be taken for comparison with and for validation of FEA results. This

 presentation will provide the details of the approach taken to this EPRI MRP project as well as

the results obtained.

In addition to the EPRI MRP project discussed above, a status update for other related PWOL

activities will be provided. As a part of the project, a Topical Report will be submitted to the NRC to aid them in establishing in service inspection frequency for a susceptible dissimilar 

metal butt weld and to provide a basis for maintaining leak before break status for the affected 

 piping. Importantly, the paper includes a recap of the March 2005 NRC kickoff meeting held tointroduce the contents for the proposed topical report. The discussion at the meeting included 

the PWOL design approach and its related benefits, summarized the licensing submittal plans

and to discuss the NRC’s approval schedule. (NRC approval was requested to support Spring

2006 PWOL implementation). Lastly, an update on the status and implications of the PWOL patent application is also expected to be included in the presentation.

Page 44: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 44/120

 

NOTES

Page 45: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 45/120

 

Past Operability Assessment o f TDAFWP due to Turbine Bearing Oil OrificeFeed Plug by Debris

Mammar Maghraoui, Tahsin Dogan, Michael W. Kelly, J oseph W. Spencer

AREVA, Framatome ANP

Roger C. Wink, Wade A. ClaspillCallaway Power Plant

 Abstract

During a periodic test of the TDAFWP at Callaway, bearing temperatures trended higher thannormal. Subsequent inspection of the bearing revealed that a wear particle obstructed about50% of the bearing port orifice area. This finding initiated a plant corrective action.

A past operability assessment of the TDAFWP turbine was requested by the plant postulating a

completely plugged oil supply orifice to the coupling end (CE) bearing during a four-hour stationblackout (SBO) condition. Under this scenario, oil can only be provided to the bearing by theexisting oil ring.

A first assessment, using conservative assumptions on bearing dynamic load, oil-ring lubricationflow, and TDAFP room equilibrium temperature during the four-hour SBO showed that fullblockage of the CE bearing oil port would be expected to result in higher than normal bearingBabbitt temperatures. These temperatures were estimated to be in the 275 F to 300 F range.

A review of the findings prompted a request for a second assessment. This time, the SBOcondition was postulated to last eight hours. Other questions relating to maximum oil levels in thebearing reservoir and foaming effects were also addressed. A more accurate model of thetransient nature of the TDAFWP room heatup to determine the maximum bearing temperatureswas developed. Interestingly, predicted maximum Babbitt temperatures (255 F) are lower in thiseight-hour analysis than the initial, four-hour run estimates. The detailed bearing analysisperformed has also determined that bearing lubrication under these conditions remainsessentially hydrodynamic with full or partial film separating the shaft from the bearing.

 This analysis required the development of (1) a starved bearing computer model, (2) input of geometric and operating parameters for the bearing and the oil, (3) determination of the oildelivery rate from the installed oil-ring, (4) and the evaluation of the heat transfer characteristicsthat add heat to or remove heat from the oil and the bearing in the fully blocked scenario.Iterative techniques were used to evaluate the changes from a baseline of existing ambientconditions up to the calculated conditions that would be reached over the mission time.

Because of very light bearing loads, the presence of ring lubrication, and the relatively shortduration of the required turbine run (eight hours), the CE bearing was predicted to provide its

main function of supporting the turbine shaft with no damage. Industry experience with thisturbine indicates adequate performance even with damage to the CE journal bearing.

Based on this analysis and industry experience the TDAFWP was declared past operable underthe postulated conditions.

Page 46: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 46/120

 

NOTES

Page 47: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 47/120

 

C C uu r r r ree n n t t I  I  s s s suuee s s ii n n F F o o s s s siil l P P r r o o c cee s s s see s s a a n n d  d  

 F Fii n n a a n n c cii a al l M  M ee t t h h o o d  d  s s 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  

JJooee CCuur r lleeyy,, EEPPR R II 

TTuueessd d aayy,, 88::0000 aamm -- 1122::0000 nnoooonn 

Page 48: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 48/120

Fossil Plant Maintenance – An Operations Perspective

Wayne Crawford EPRI, Maintenance Programs

Phone: 704-717-6437

Email: [email protected]: [email protected]

 ABSTRACT For plants to achieve excellent performance as determined by any number of measures

such as, reliability, production cost, personnel safety, environmental compliance, or other measure; the plant organization including operations and maintenance must perform as an

effective team. Often maintenance programs, processes, and technologies are addressed 

without sufficient integration with plant operations. Since operations plays a key role inmaintenance activities such as deficiency identification, work control, equipment removal

and isolation; giving visibility to these topics as an integral part of maintenance should 

contribute to more successful implementation of maintenance improvementefforts. Active participation of plant operators and their management in the efforts toachieve more effective maintenance coupled with plant goals that reflect the integrated 

 performance of both organizations will lead to higher levels of performance. Some of the

key areas of interaction are described from the operations view for your consideration.

Page 49: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 49/120

 

NOTES

Page 50: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 50/120

TRANSFORMATION TO KNOWLEDGE-BASED MAINTENANCE:

CHALLENGES OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT IN A LARGE POWER

UTILITY

S.C. Deo SharmaPankaj Bhartiya

Anil MittalNational Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.

7, Institutional Area, Lodhi RoadNew Delhi-110003, India

Patrick D AbbottEPRI Solutions, Inc., USA

 Abstract

 National Thermal Power Corporation, the largest power producer of India havingcapacities of over 24000 MW spread over 25 locations in the country, has initiated an

ambitious maintenance optimization effort. Management has set the maintenance goal

of ‘zero forced outage’ and implementing an integrated strategy for optimization of 

routine maintenance, overhauling management, shared maintenance, work processmanagement and IT enabling for achieving optimum cost & reliability.

The biggest challenge faced by utility is transforming its maintenance practices from

deep-seated traditional time based preventive maintenance culture to ‘Knowledge-Based 

maintenance’. Paper describes the ‘Maintenance Road-map’ for utility and corporatestrategy adopted for wide spread implementation by development of multi disciplinary

teams around Corporate, Regional and Station ‘Process Anchors’.

Through experiential learning, NTPC has customized various EPRI tools and evolved a

well-documented procedure for undertaking PM Basis evaluation of all units and tracking

its benefits in a coordinated manner. The PM Basis implementation is already inadvanced stage in about 25 units by in-house teams and will be covering over 100 units in

next few months. Once completed, it will be one of the biggest efforts in implementingPM Basis in a large utility in shortest possible time. This is an important step towards

introduction of Risk Evaluation & Prioritization (REaP) concepts for risk minimization &

cost optimization. Paper discusses the cultural challenges faced and programmaticelements put in place to implement this transformation ‘road-map’ named Project REAP

and shares experiences in this journey.

Page 51: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 51/120

 

NOTES

Page 52: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 52/120

From a Silo Operated Maintenance Practice to a Fully Integrated

Maintenance

Azwi Mamanyuha, Pr Eng, MSAIEE

Maintenance Specialist

Eskom Resource and StrategyIndustry Association (Distribution Technology)

Cnr Lake and Power Road 

Germiston 1400 South AfricaTel: (+2711) 871 3987

Fax: (+2711) 871 2372

ABSTRACT Eskom is a South African electricity company which has three divisions; Generation, Transmission and 

Distribution. The company is responsible of generating, transmission and distribution of electricity in

South Africa. It also exports a certain percentage to the neighbouring states. All these three divisions are

managed by Eskom Management Board and are regulated by the National Electricity Regulator (NER).

The utility has been operating in a monopoly since inception. As a hundred percent shareholder owner,

the government has issued warnings that competition will soon be introduced. There are also speculations

that a certain portion of Generation will be sold to Independent Power Producers (IPP). Preparations are

in place to combine the Distribution division with Metropolitan distributors and Municipalities. Various

 players in the electricity market are awaiting the unbundling of the electricity market. The challenges

facing the organisations are that it needs to start reducing the cost of production before competition is

introduced. These challenges escalate down to reduction of maintenance costs. The maintenance

engineers need to come up with maintenance philosophies which will optimize the assets and enhance the

 bottom line of the company.

If Eskom's portion can be owned by Independent Power Producers, then new business goals will emerge.

The current maintenance engineers are faced with challenges of ensuring reliability and availability of the

aging assets, reduce risk of failure and at the same time make sure that the electricity generation is

 profitable with increased performance and still meet new business goals.

Currently maintenance in Generation is divided into plants, e.g. Electrical maintenance, Mechanical

(Turbine and Boiler) and Auxiliary maintenance. Even in Electrical Maintenance department the

 personnel are divided into sub plants like: electrical boiler, electrical turbine maintenance and electrical

out side plant maintenance. The challenges are that these departments operate in silos where each

department operates independent of the other. The result being that some of the defects are not attended in

time because one department may not be exactly sure which department has to do the job. Generation is

also still relying on old maintenance strategies suggested by original equipment manufacturers (OEM)

about thirty years ago which some of them did not even consider the South African conditions.

The author recommends newly researched technologies as well as introducing new ways of maintaining

the plant. This can be achieved through a fully integrated department composed of different skills either 

electrical or mechanical. These will reduce the time to repair the defect and increase reliability of the

assets. The one integrated department will take advantage of the synergy by combining skills tapped from

different fields. The new maintenance technology can be applied on power station equipment and henceincrease reliability and availability and optimize the profits.

1

Page 53: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 53/120

 

NOTES

Page 54: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 54/120

“Automating the PM Template and Maintenance Strategy Development

Process at ConEdison”

Matt Walther 

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

(212) 460-3065

Evan Niemkiewicz

Insert Key Solutions, Inc.(610) 459-4400

 ABSTRACT

ConEdison is optimizing maintenance at four of its fossil steam and power generation plants

across Manhattan, New York. This effort includes the development of PM Templates and their 

implementation in the form of component-based Maintenance Strategies. MaintenanceStrategies include component classification, template association, comparison of the suggested 

template tasks and frequencies to actual maintenance practices, and the addition of manual tasks.

In many cases, this is attempted with Microsoft Word, Excel, or Access PM Templates and acrude implementation process. This effort suffers from inefficiencies due to the inability to shareinformation between sites, to standardize the process and workflow, and to keep data

synchronized between revisions. The weak IT architecture results in poor application

 performance, loss of data, and frequent outages. ConEdison has successfully implemented acentralized, web-based software application named IQReview which has provided many

 benefits. A single instance of the application installed at corporate offices supports all four sites

in one database. The simple user interface improves process efficiency and key performanceindicators can be automatically generated to measure progress across the sites. This paper 

discusses some of the lessons learned during the implementation at ConEdison and the benefits

that can be achieved.

Page 55: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 55/120

 

NOTES

Page 56: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 56/120

New Business Model for Leveraging Technological Advancements toachieve the market determined price for power in Ageing Power Plants

Mr.D.S.Sharma Executive Director NTPCOperation Services (R&M)

e-mail: [email protected]

C.SubramaniamDeputy General Manager NTPC

Operation Services (R&M)e-mail: [email protected]

National Thermal Power CorporationEngineering Office Complex, A-8A, Sector-24,

NOIDA – 201301, (UP) INDIAPhone: 91 120 2410294

Fax: 91 120 2410545 / 2410136

 ABSTRACTNational Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) is the largest power company in India. NTPC’s presentinstalled capacity is 23,435 MW consisting of 13 coal based and seven combined cycle gas basedpower stations. With only 19.1% of India’s total installed capacity it contributes 26.7% of thecountry’s power generation. NTPC plans to be a 40,000 MW company by 2012, so cost - effective

management of its assets is of key importance.  The total capacity is made of up 103 machines comprising 71 thermal units of 60 / 110 / 200 / 210 /500 MW rating, 22 gas units and 10 Steam Turbines in combined cycle mode. The average age of NTPC units is 88,000 operating hours with respect to coal fired units and about 67,000 hours withrespect to the gas based units.

Over and above the periodic maintenance, NTPC has been carrying out specific maintenance /modernization activities in the plants which have crossed 100,000 hours of operation, which aremainly focussed on sustaining the current levels of efficiency and performance. These have beenmainly one-is-to-one replacement to cater to site specific problems, obsolescence and the changingenvironmental standards. When the initial series of Units which are of the ‘80s vintage completearound 200,000 Hrs. of operation, sometime around 2008 - 10, it would be necessary to consider

High End Solutions (HES) with the aim of bringing the efficiency and performance of the aging unitson par with the contemporary Units. This would involve major retrofits / up-rates of Turbine-Generator, Steam Generator and Auxiliaries as compared to one-is-to-one replacement done earlier.

 This would  not only have to  leverage the technological advancements  between 1980-2010, butshould also aim at driving down the Cost of Generation (COG) while factoring in the emergingbusiness scenario to meet the market determined price for power. 

NTPC is developing a new business model to cater to its ageing fleet. Some of the factors beingconsidered for developing the model are:

• The emerging competitive scenario in the Indian Power Sector.

• The emerging scenario of carbon abatement.

• Leveraging current technology to reduce COG.

• Capacity building to develop HES and reduce dependency on Original Equipment Manufacturers.• Development of Perspective Rolling Plans identifying dates for carrying out these activities in the ageing

Units in a time bound manner as is being done for new builds.

•  Strategic collaboration with reputed international agencies in this field.

Some of the activities being considered to lower the COG are:

• Feasibility Study for Retrofit of Advanced Super Critical Boiler and Turbine technology in the existing olderunits.

• Upgradation of Process parameters to enhance efficiencies.

• Retrofitting of Steam Generators to operate with low water mass fluxes.

• Retrofitting of turbine rotor trains incorporating the latest state of the art blading.

• Incorporation of the latest state of the art asset management system.

 The paper will explain the New Business Model and NTPC’s approach for Leveraging TechnologicalAdvancements to achieve the market determined price for power in Ageing Power Plants.

Page 57: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 57/120

 

NOTES

Page 58: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 58/120

Condition Based Maintenance: PlantView Knowledge Management 

Paul Gwizdala George Lum

DTE Energy Southern Company

Phone: 734-384-2110 Phone: 205-992-5553

e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] 

 ABSTRACT

The Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) process provides the production staff with the knowledge to

make condition directed run or maintain decisions. It enables identification of planned corrective

maintenance work directed by equipment condition in lieu of scheduled maintenance. Many sources of 

equipment condition monitoring information; real time process data, technical condition diagnostic data,

operator and engineer rounds information, inspection and surveillance data, and operator log information are

used to perform a condition assessment. The objective of the CBM program is to provide condition directed 

work identification before failure or occurrence of an “unacceptable” operating state drives unplanned 

emergent work.

EPRI’s PlantView applications are being used to automate CBM knowledge management. This web-based 

software provides access to information and process applications across the intranet for all production staff 

using browser technologies. The applications automate the entry and capture of data, aid analysis, manage

knowledge processes, display reports and maintain a documented history as an integrated knowledge

management system. This paper will describe the knowledge applications for a condition based maintenance

 program, how they are used by the production team, and the benefits of an integrated open access program

over traditional work process tools. The PlantView Predictive Maintenance Application is focused on CBM

condition status reports to guide condition directed maintenance activities. This application maintains the

 program Equipment & Condition Indicator (E&CI) matrix, and provides an efficient process for diagnostic

data collection as PdM Tech Exams, documents equipment condition assessments, manages case histories,

compiles a condition status report, and captures performance measures of the CBM program effectiveness.The PlantView Electronic Rounds application escalates the value of collecting rounds data by enabling

viewing rounds data and managing the data for equipment condition analysis to create PdM Tech exams.

The PlantView Data Visualizer application is designed to access process data from process historians as a

condition indicator to support condition assessment. The PlantView Report Library Application provides the

infrastructure to capture and manage engineering assessments that are critical to O&M work process

optimization. This application enables documenting engineering assessments from inspections and NDE

analysis, creating equipment assessments, and compiling a Condition Status Report. The PlantView

Electronic Logbook enhances communication of equipment condition between production teams with access

to shift notes, organizational logs, operating concerns, and work around logs. The PlantView System Health

Report facilitates quarterly unit condition reviews where the production team and management participate in

conducting system health assessments to make operational and maintenance decisions.

Page 59: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 59/120

 

NOTES

Page 60: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 60/120

VALUE ENGINEERING: STRATEGY FOR INCREASING

PERFORMANCE AND REDUCING COSTS IN UTILITIES

A.K. Tripathi, Senior Manager (International Cell)

 National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd, Noida, India

[email protected]@hotmail.com

 

Mailing Address and Phone NumbersSenior Manager (International Cell), NTPC Consultancy Wing,

 NTPC, Sector-24, Noida

Ph: 0091-120-2597220 (O)Ph: 0091-120-2504240 (R)

Fax: 0091-120-2410608

GSM: 00919868391131

 ABSTRACTRapid changes in Electricity Market world over have created an environment of fierce

competition in production of Electricity. Many countries have introduced sweepingderegulation and liberalization in electricity market. Power producers world over are

therefore faced with complicated and dynamic situation where the “Survival Of The

Fittest” theory is truly unfolding. India is no exception. Wide-ranging changes in tariff structure and Operating Norms are already under force in India. Leading Utilities like

 NTPC in India are today encountering unprecedented challenges in maintaining

excellence and growth.

Modern concepts of performance enhancement along with cost reduction are therefore

dire need of the time. Serious thought must be given to control costs and at the same timemaintain pace with cutting edge technology. This is a difficult task. Controlling costs and 

improving performance therefore needs prudent strategy.

Page 61: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 61/120

 

NOTES

Page 62: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 62/120

 

C C  o o s s t t a a n n d  d R Reel l ii a a b biil l ii t t y y T T ee c c h h n niiqquuee s s f  f  o o r r 

 N  N uu c cl l ee a a r r P P o owwee r r 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  

GGeeoor r ggee VVaannDDeer r HHoor r nn,, EEPPR R II 

TTuueessd d aayy,, 88::0000 aamm -- 1122::0000 nnoooonn 

Page 63: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 63/120

Equipment Reliability Process   – A Case Study of a North AmericanNuclear Generating Station

Morgan Grainger, Marketing Coordinator, Ivara Corporation935 Sheldon Court, Burlington, Ontario, L7L 5K6

 Tel: 905-632-8000 ext 310 Fax: 905-632=5129 [email protected] Co-presenters

Representative from the North American Nuclear Generating StationSandra DiMatteo, Product Manager, Ivara Corporation

 Tel: 905-632-8000 ext 271 Fax: 905-632-5129 [email protected] 

 ABSTRACT Better asset performance through improved equipment reliability is being recognized as a key contributorto success by senior management at leading commercial nuclear power plants. By optimizing assetreliability, utilities are responding to important business challenges they face on a daily basis including:

• regulatory compliance

safety and environmental integrity• doing more with less

• capturing the knowledge of the aging workforce

 To address these challenges, leading utilities are establishing strategies to transition into reliability-basedorganizations by implementing a total asset reliability solution. This solution combines advancedtechnology with strategic and functional reliability practices that support the equipment reliability processand ensure sustainable reliability improvements are realized. By focusing on the equipment reliabilityprocess, utilities are able to establish and sustain a proactive maintenance environment – optimizingasset reliability and driving business results.

See how a total asset reliability solution has helped a North American Nuclear Generating Station identifythe right work to do, on the right equipment, at the right time. This case study will focus on the company’s

equipment reliability process initiative to optimize equipment reliability while managing cost efficiencies. This session presents and discusses the reliability practices and technologies used by the nucleargenerating station to:

• focus employee roles and responsibilities on the equipment reliability process

• move to a proactive, condition-based approach to reliability and work management

• pull together the islands of data required to keep reliability and performance on target

• capture the reliability knowledge of the aging equipment experts

Equipment reliability is a key driving factor in nuclear asset management and utility performance today. This nuclear generating station’s progressive approach positions them at the forefront of the utilitiesindustry amidst restructuring and deregulation as well as political and public pressures.

Page 64: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 64/120

 

NOTES

Page 65: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 65/120

Laser Scanning Offers Significant Benefits for the Power Market

Eric Hale

Quantapoint, Inc.

 ABSTRACT

With an aging fleet and limited capital for new investment, power producers are seeking to maximizeexisting resources and assets. Plants must improve all aspects of operation and maintenance to be

competitive. Runtimes are increasing while outage durations are decreasing. Today, world class

generators are approaching 20-day refuel outages and are then going on to set records for capacity and availability. These power producers are only able to achieve world class performance by seamless

execution of maintenance and modifications.

A significant challenge for maintenance and modifications is that they have inaccurate “as-built”documentation. Teams engage in a time-consuming process of manually measuring equipment or facilities

dimensions in the field using the conventional tools of a tape measure, plumb bob, and note pad. Some

 plants are beginning to capitalize on the benefits that laser scanning technology has afforded the processand refining industries for more than 10 years.

All project stakeholders – owner operators, engineers, designers, maintenance personnel, project managers,and equipment vendors – find that laser documentation provides benefits. Early adopters consider laser scanning to be more safe, fast, accurate, complete, and transportable than other options for capturing and 

sharing dimensional details of existing facilities.

The tangible benefits of as-built documentation include:

•  Quality improvements from greater accuracy and precision that improves engineering designs.

•  Scheduling improvements by reducing time spent in plants collecting data, improving designefficiency, enabling prefabrication of components, minimizing construction durations, and less

rework.

•  Safety and ALARA improvements by reducing the exposure to potential hazards within the

 plant environment.

•  Reduced costs resulting from quickly capturing as-built dimensions, eliminating construction

rework and field changes, and shorter outage durations.

The experience and benefits for several recent projects is presented. The key factors for planning an as-

 built documentation project are presented. Several different technologies are compared and contrasted.

Page 66: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 66/120

 

NOTES

Page 67: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 67/120

Writing and implementing Packing Procedures –

Lesson’s Learned 

Ron Frisard

AW Chesterton

860 Salem Street, Building A

Groveland, MA 01834 

 ABSTRACT

In today’s electricity generation industry world critical valve performance is

a key part of safe and reliable plant operation. How plants’ Packing

 procedures are written and implemented is critical in today’s world of 

shortened outages and extended up-time. There is no time for repetitive

gland adjustments or frequent packing installations because of poorly written packing installation procedures. This paper will focus on plants with well-

written procedures that have resulted in maintenance, engineering, and I&C

groups taking total ownership of achieving peak performance from critical

AOV / MOV Valves. This paper will also include discussions regarding

 packing consolidation procedures and the misuse of stem lubricants to mask 

 packing friction. Today it is important to utilize new low friction packing

technology to enhance valve operability without sacrificing long-term valve

sealing.

Page 68: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 68/120

 

NOTES

Page 69: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 69/120

GRAY WATER COOLING IN SURFACE CONDENSERS AND HEAT

EXCHANGERS - TREND OR ABERRATION

Dennis J . SchumerthManager - Titanium Products

VALTIMET, Inc.14281 Franklin Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 USA

Phone 714-573-1000 FAX 714-426-0001 Cell 714-393-1013E-mail [email protected] 

Webb Site: Valtimet.com 

 ABSTRACT In recent years, concern over the continued use of limited fresh water supplies or similarly,cooling towers and their essential makeup, high maintenance and associated chemicaltreatment requirements has spawned a crafty, yet dramatic change in powerplant surfacecondenser and heat exchanger cooling. The paradigm shift away from the more establishedand typical toward the more unconventional has produced an innovative and non-traditional

cooling water source for surface condensers and heat exchangers. Clearly, gray water-coolinghas come of age.

By definition, gray water is cooling water where all or part of the flow stream is made up of eitherpartially or fully treated sewage effluent. As you can well imagine, the use of sewage effluentprovokes a plethora of new issues. They are led by the voluminous unknowns that flow fromsociety to the sewage treatment plant and the economics of processing and transporting this“impaired water” from the municipal host to the ultimate user. The application of this relativelynew cooling medium suggests the potential impact of this “water” on plant metallurgy, chemicaltreatment requirements, corrosion abatement and other physical plant system needs, can beloosely categorized as both speculative and unproven. Without a clear understanding of legislative and political landscape issues, the regulative complexities that deal with this type of 

cooling water could conceivably lead to an unattractive, environmental legacy.

Having duly noted the “trend or aberration” dilemma, this paper will further identify efforts by themunicipal wastewater treatment plants to economically process a usable product. We will alsoinvestigate the impact of ancillary add-on costs absorbed by the electric utility such assecondary filtration. Finally, the paper will evaluate new operational conditions, potentially newcorrosion activities, metallurgical changes, pollution considerations, maintenance issues andother mechanisms which have forced utilities to be innovative in seeking alternative coolingwater sources for the main surface condenser and other heat exchangers.

Page 70: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 70/120

 

NOTES

Page 71: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 71/120

PM Basis Client/Server 1.0 (PMDB 6.0)Marty Bridges

EPRI, Maintenance Processes & Software

Phone: 704-547-6175

Email: [email protected]

 ABSTRACT Maintenance personnel at many US nuclear plants have an interest in reducing preventive maintenance

costs and improving equipment performance by more closely matching PM tasks with the functional

importance of equipment. For this to succeed, utilities require information on the most appropriate tasks

and task intervals for the important equipment types, while accounting for the influences of duty cycle

and service conditions. The need for the database information was originally pointed out by members of 

the former EPRI Reliability Centered Maintenance Users Group during 1988-1994. The original data for 

39 component types were assembled during 1996-98, have been published as a series of reports in EPRI

TR-106857, November 1998, as an electronic database described in EPRI Product 1001448, Preventive

Maintenance Basis Database Version 3.01, User Manual, January 2001, and as Version 4 of the database

released in December 2002. Making the information available as an electronic database has significantlyincreased its accessibility, and brings advanced analysis tools within reach. A fully integrated 

Application Guideline advises users on making changes to PM tasks, on the deferral of tasks, and many

other technical aspects of managing a PM program. The Application Guideline was requested by utility

engineers at an EPRI workshop toward the end of 1998, and was first included in Version 3.01.

Objectives

The Preventive Maintenance Basis Database provides the nuclear utility maintenance community with an

essential reference for preventive maintenance task selection and evaluation for common major 

components. It also provides the rationale for each task, and the influence of the equipment failure

locations, failure mechanisms, and the timing of failures, on task content and task intervals.

Major advances in Client/Server Version 1.0 include the update of component data, the addition of thecapability to semi-automate the building of the plant PM program, the capability to generate detailed lists

of as-found conditions specific to each PM task and component type, the expansion and automation of the

Vulnerability Evaluation, and the inclusion of modules to estimate economic risk for critical components

and to evaluate the balance between reliability and availability when making PM changes. In addition,

the software is now operates in a MS.NET environment utilizing MS SQL Server.

Approach

Expert panels composed of knowledgeable individuals from EPRI, EPRI member utilities, and 

manufacturers, were employed to formulate the technical bases of PM task options presented for the

selected equipment. Most of the expert panels addressed a small number of closely associated component

types, e.g. three types of pressure relief valves. A utility oversight committee, the PM Basis steering

committee, was established to oversee and direct this process. Once the data had been reviewed and  published, contractors loaded it into a Microsoft Access database, and designed forms to display the data

in useful ways. Experience from almost two decades of PM optimization studies with EPRI utility

members was embedded in the Application Guideline and in the Vulnerability Evaluation. Industry

working groups in many areas of maintenance technology and equipment reliability improvement,

contribute to the database by providing experts at ongoing industry meetings, who assist in keeping the

information up-to-date. 

Results

The result of this work is a database containing over 200,000 data fields of utility PM information, which

represents several decades of utility experience of improving equipment reliability with cost-effective PM

Page 72: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 72/120

tasks. The Application Guideline brings together many lessons learned by the industry in the process of 

implementing Reliability Centered Maintenance and other reliability improvement activities. These

lessons have been incorporated into simple procedures which show how the database can help to manage

and optimize a nuclear plant PM program and how it can inform many of the day-to-day decisions which

PM coordinators and system engineers must make.

Page 73: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 73/120

 

NOTES

Page 74: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 74/120

WHERE HAS ALL THE “TRIBAL KNOWLEDGE” GONE?

Mark A. Goodman

UE Systems, Inc.14 Hayes Street

Elmsford, NY 10523

Tel: 914-592-1220

Fax: [email protected]

 

 ABSTRACT As demands on maintenance departments and inspectors have increased, some of the

“tribal knowledge” of how specific items in the plant and or production process has been

disappearing due to layoffs and early retirement of key people. There is a need to adoptmethods and technologies to assist a new generation of inspection personnel. New

advances in ultrasound technology are ideally suited for this demand. Ultrasound 

technology now provides inspectors with a complete range if inspection, recording,

analysis and reporting capabilities.

Of the technologies available for condition monitoring, ultrasound inspection offers a

unique position as both an integrating technology and as an effective tool that can speed up the inspection/analysis process. Many inspectors are using ultrasound instruments as

their basic screening tool to identify anomalies and to help them determine effective

follow-up actions such as recommendations for more frequent monitoring, additionaltesting with other technologies or corrective procedures.

This presentation will describe the basics of the technology, how it has evolved, the latestadvancements in digital instruments and software, which will help assure asset reliability,

reduce unplanned downtime and improve system efficiencies.

Page 75: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 75/120

 

Issue Gathering on Recent CMMSInstallations

Marty BridgesEPRI

Panel Session

Page 76: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 76/120

 

NOTES

Page 77: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 77/120

 

NOTES

Page 78: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 78/120

 

 M  M  a aii n n t tee n n a a n n c cee SS t t r r a a t tee g giiee s s o o n n E Eqquuii p p m mee n n t t 

 R Reel l ii a a b biil l ii t t y y 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  

MMaar r ttyyBBr r iid d ggeess,,EEPPR R II 

TTuueessd d aayy,, 11::3300 p pmm -- 55::0000 p pmm 

Page 79: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 79/120

Using Risk Informed Maintenance Strategies for High Voltage Networks

 Authors

Paul Hendrix 

MaintControl International De Bouw 123

NL-3991 SZ HoutenThe Netherlands

Phone: +31 30 281 7823Fax: +31 30 267 0180 

email: [email protected]

Edward Abbott 

 ABZ, Inc.Suite 101, 4451 Brookfield Corporate Drive

Chantilly, VAPhone: 703-631-7401

Fax: 703-631-5282 email: [email protected]

Transmission System Operator (TSO) TenneT manages the 'expressways' of the Dutchhigh voltage network (380 and 220 kV). As network manager/TSO, TenneT isresponsible for the high voltage network that links all the regional electricity networks

and the European network. TenneT monitors the reliability and continuity of theelectricity supply in the Netherlands. TenneT makes its high voltage network availablein an impartial fashion for the transport of electricity and ensures the required balance

between supply and demand in the Netherlands. TenneT works together with EuropeanTSOs. Since October 2001, the national government is a 100% share owner of TenneT.

TenneT implemented maintenance plans based on risk analysis, supported by the useof Optimizer+. As a result, TenneT expects to realize yearly maintenance cost savings

between 10 and 25 percent. This paper describes the results of this optimizationprocess for a specific component, the rail separator in a 380 kV high voltage station.

Implementation of the optimized maintenance plan will reduce the costs by over 16percent and lower the hours of downtime by almost 24 percent.

This paper will discuss approach, specific use of Optimizer+, and the results achieved.

Illustrations in the form of screenshots and other visual presentations of the results inthe final paper will provide insight into how Optimizer+ aided the risk analysis process.

TenneT used Optimizer+ to map the relationship between risk on the one hand andoperational and financial performance on the other.

The following steps were carried out during implementation of the project:1. Collecting information on assets.

2. Building a library database.3. Modeling a station.4. Carrying out risk analysis.5. Formulating and simulating the maintenance concept.

Page 80: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 80/120

With the help of Optimizer+, TenneT can model the entire installation, carry out riskanalyses, take the necessary preventive measures, and calculate the effects of variousscenarios. This enables TenneT to make decisions regarding maintenance strategies,

with the aim of optimizing the existing maintenance plan. The process provides the user with the required insight into the balance between maintenance, costs, performance

and risk in relationship to the overall company goals. In practical terms, TenneTdemonstrated that the use of Optimizer+ for a rail separator can reduce maintenancecosts by an average of 16 percent, as well as reduce downtime by 24 percent.

Page 81: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 81/120

 

NOTES

Page 82: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 82/120

Submitted to “Fifth EPRI International Conference on Maintenance (Aug'05)”

Low-Cost SF6 Gas Monitor 

George W. Rhodes and Tristan D. FinAvistar, Inc2401 Aztec N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87107

505.855.6499

 ABSTRACT

The electric utility industry uses Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) as the dielectric gas for breaker switches. SF6 is 25,000 times more damaging to the environment than CO2 as a greenhouse gas.Gas containment systems have several mechanical seals that degrade with time allowingatmospheric release. Utilities need to monitor each of the containment sites, but the cost of 

available systems has prohibited widespread deployment. The current EPRI camera offeringwould benefit if the measurements were focused on known leaking switches. To providecomplete surveillance, a pressure sensor, thermistor and PIC chip have been combined - keepingthe cost of goods sold under $250. Monitoring pressure levels of SF6 as a function of temperatureallows good scheduling of maintenance and repair. This relative measurement technique can bedeployed on any SF6 switch, independent of environment (0-100psi, -20-75 C) withoutreconfiguration. The system’s output is available through three channels: 0-5V, 0-1mA, and 8-bitdigital. The digital channel is configured for a variety of communication protocols to interfacewith SCADA, or other reporting systems.

Page 83: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 83/120

 

NOTES

Page 84: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 84/120

On-Line and Off-Line Testing as Part of a

Predictive Maintenance Program

Timothy M. Thomas

Senior Applications Engineer 

Baker Instrument Company

4812 McMurry Ave.

Fort Collins, CO 80525

Ph. 800-752-8272

Fax 970-282-1010

e-mail: [email protected] 

 Abstract

Motors are a part of a “system” which

includes the incoming power, the load 

and, of course, the motor itself.Maintaining the safe and profitable

operation of plants and facilities,demands a high degree of motor reliability. The power generation industry

ranks at the top of this requirement for 

uninterrupted operation and safe,continued production. This paper seeks to

 present the most current, effective and 

widely accepted methods of electrically

testing and trending the operationalhealth of electric motors. The benefits

and features of various modern electrical

test equipment and testing methodologieswill also be discussed.

Predictive maintenance programs areonly effective when all available means

of measuring and trending the condition

of electric motors, cables and switch gear are utilized. Modern test equipment exist

to both simulate “real-world” situations

in static testing and acquire safe and 

complete dynamic data in the motor’snatural environment.

Static data helps define the motor’sinsulation integrity and modern

equipment is capable of aiding

technicians in predicting imminentfailures before they become catastrophic.

Effective static test equipment is capable

of testing the components of motors at

voltage levels similar to those the motor will see in its normal operation without

destructive currents. Static testing should 

include the surge test which is the most

effective method of insuring the integrity

of the copper-to-copper insulation.Modern test equipment will provide

trending logs and reports allowingtechnicians to track the decline in the

motors health.

State-of-the-art dynamic test equipment

can locate power related issues and load 

 problems as well as motor condition problems. The most modern of 

equipment can calculate speed and 

torque, define rotor bar problems and 

measure distortion. Dynamic testing of electric motors is a relatively new field 

that has huge potential and is growing

rapidly. Numerous mechanical issues are being identified including bearing

 problems, mechanical looseness and 

many other concerns. Dynamic testingwill help separate mechanical from

electrical issues and provides extensive

information regarding the root-cause of motor failures.

An effective Predictive Maintenance

Program must include both static and dynamic motor testing if the program is

to be successful. Each defines specific

areas of concern regarding the motor system, each has its limitations, and each

lends support to the other.

Page 85: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 85/120

 

NOTES

Page 86: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 86/120

Increased Productivity, Reliability, and Accuracy at Lower Cost: Applying the Proven Benefits of Electronic Performance Support 

Technology to Power Plant Maintenance Author

 Names:

 Roger

 LaPlante

 and

 Anna

 Liisa

 Van

 Mantgem

 

Company:  REI Systems, Inc. 

Email Addresses:  [email protected] and [email protected]

Mailing Address:  7620 Little River Turnpike, Suite 500 

Annandale, Virginia 22003 

Phone Number:  703‐256‐2245 

FAX number:  703‐256‐9372 

 ABSTRACT

Electronic performance support systems (EPSS) are web-enabled software applications that

 provide maintenance technicians with standardized work procedures integrated with equipmentdiagrams, animated electrical schematics, part ordering information, assembly drawings,technical tips, Computer Based Training (CBT) clips, and other mission-critical information

resources. EPSS applications are rapidly gaining popularity in both commercial and military

settings due to their demonstrated success at optimizing maintenance effectiveness. Numerousindustrial and military tests have proven that electronic performance support systems increase

workforce productivity by 30% or more while concurrently increasing troubleshooting and repair 

accuracy rates and boosting equipment reliability and availability levels. Furthermore, theElectric Power Research Institute, which has been active at the forefront of EPSS research and 

development since the late 1990s, is focusing on performance support technology to help reduce

maintenance expenditures, provide technicians with refresher training at the point of need, and 

manage organizational knowledge assets, among other functions.

This session will summarize the results of EPRI’s recent electronic performance support systemcase study performed at Bull Run Fossil Plant, a Tennessee Valley Authority facility, and will

 present other results and metrics culled from performance support technology tests conducted in

2004-2005. Maintenance managers will be instructed how to apply performance supporttechnology effectively to achieve similar results within their own maintenance organizations.

Topics to be discussed include how electronic performance support systems can elevate

maintenance department productivity by 30% or more without altering the size or structure of theexisting workforce; how performance support systems can streamline parts inventories and stores

 by increasing maintenance accuracy and reducing false removals of functional components; how

 performance support systems serve as a core component of knowledge management and processimprovement initiatives; and more. Session participants will gain a thorough understanding of 

the electronic performance support system concept, learn about the proven benefits of the

technology, and receive detailed guidance on how to successfully implement an EPSS program

within their own maintenance organizations. 

Page 87: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 87/120

 

NOTES

Page 88: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 88/120

Equipment Condition Assessment

Brandon Rasmussen

Project Engineer 

EPRI I&C Center 

Kingston Fossil Plant

714 Swan Pond Road 

Harriman, TN

 Abstract

Equipment Condition Assessment (ECA) is an emerging technology which can provide on-line

component health for further diagnostics, and/or prognostics. . ECA is based on an empirical

model of a component based on measured process variables and other information. Its

implementation is usually via automated, on-line methodology where input data to the model are

 periodically collected (once a minute, hour, etc.). The model is able to detect “anomalies”— 

deviations from normal operation using an anomaly detection algorithm, and a logic-rule-based 

anomaly interpretation scheme.

The goal of ECA is to provide an early warning of equipment degradation or failure such that

 proper actions can be taken to minimize the effects of that failure, including: parts inventory,

maintenance scheduling, maintenance planning, and load reduction to contain the failure or 

reduce the rate of degradation.

The development of empirical models for ECA consists mainly of grouping together an

appropriate set of correlated process variables, and gathering historical data for those process

variables. Predictive maintenance data and qualitative “rounds” data may provide additional

information that can be input to the empirical model. The mechanics of how to couple disparate

sources of data remains a challenge; however, once a developed model is placed in-service, an

anomaly detection algorithm is coupled to the model which continuously evaluates the residual

differences between the process variable measurements and the empirical model estimations. Ananomaly is defined as a deviation from expected behavior, which in most cases is a deviation of 

the residual values from a normally distributed density of known variance and a zero mean. The

final aspect of ECA is automating the interpretation of simultaneous anomalies such that a single

succinct diagnosis or prognosis can be announced.

EPRI is assisting in ECA deployment for a pilot study at a fossil power plant and for a large scale

fleet-wide monitoring implementation. Progress Energy’s Mayo fossil plant is the host site where

SmartSignal’s eCM software has been installed. The software performs ECA utilizing models

that are specifically tailored for this application based on the available process variables and 

historical data from the process variable sensors. The scope of the pilot study initially includes

 boiler feed pumps, induced draft fans, and forced draft fans. TXU Energy has undertaken the

development of a centralized Power Optimization Center which will carry out, among other things, thermal performance monitoring, vibration monitoring, and ECA for their fleet of plants.

The ECA implementations at the TXU Energy sites are plant-wide as opposed to the limited 

 breadth of the pilot study at Progress Energy. The experiences gathered through these efforts will

 be documented in the form of descriptions, illustrations, and evaluations of the developed ECA

models.

Page 89: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 89/120

 

NOTES

Page 90: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 90/120

Internal Pipe Seals for Repair of Cooling Water Piping and ExpansionJoints

Peter R. Blais, PELeo Nadeau

Hunting Pipeline Services1210 Glendale-Milford Road

Cincinnati , Ohio 45215

 ABSTRACTAs power plants continue to age past their intended design life, several areas of the rawwater system will eventually require attention. Areas that require attention includepiping susceptible to preferential attack at welded joints, corrosion at flanged, bell &spigot connections, and steel to concrete transitions. Circulating water expansion jointshave also become susceptible to leakage and catastrophic failure as they age wellbeyond the intended design life.

Internal sealing of raw water piping to arrest corrosion has been utilized inmunicipal, industrial and power applications for over twenty-five years. This processconsist of an EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) rubber seal that is positionedover the affected area and locked in place with two hydraulically expanded stainlesssteel retaining bands, located at each end of the seal.

Cooling water piping system leaks often suggest that large sections of pipe mayneed to be replaced. In many cases the deterioration is limited to the pipe joints.Preferential attack at welded joints is a common problem and deteriorated conditionscan also be found at flanged, bell & spigot connections, and steel to concrete pipetransitions. Typically, repairs range from complete excavation (if required) andreplacement of the affected area to welded patches and belly bands. The internal seal is

a relatively simple method to isolate or repair deteriorated areas in all piping materials indiameters ranging from 16 inches to 18 feet. As many as 100 smaller diameter sealscan be installed, inspected and tested during a 48 hour time period. To seal longerlengths of piping the seals can also be interlocked together to form a continuousprotective membrane. In addition, the seals can be specially formed for elbows tees andother fittings.

In the last few years the internal seal has successfully been used to repaircirculating water expansion joints. A repair technique utilizing a backing strip of stainless steel is installed over the existing expansion joint convolution to providereinforcement at the joint. The seal is installed on the inside diameter of the expansion joint and restrained by two bands at each end with an extra band provided to anchor the

backing strip on one end. This repair takes the place of the expansion joint andprovides the required flexibility while maintaining pressure boundary integrity. Theexisting expansion joints are not removed from the system. This new advance ininternal sealing design have led to the ability to repair expansion joints insitu and thuseliminating significant maintenance costs. It is the intent of this paper to demonstratethe capabilities of the internal seal repair methodology, the design basis and the rangeof plant components where this technology can be applied.

Page 91: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 91/120

 

NOTES

Page 92: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 92/120

FAULT ZONE ANALYSIS

IDENTIFYING MOTOR DEFECTS USING THE ROTOR FAULT

ZONE

David L. McKinnonPdMA Corporation

5909-C Hampton Oaks Parkway

Tampa, Florida 33610Phone: 813-621-6463

Fax: 813-620-0206

[email protected]

 ABSTRACT

In the last decade, advancements in motor testing technology have brought forth

advances in online and offline testing. Online Current Signature Analysis (CSA) isquickly becoming a standard industry practice. Offline tests include advanced inductance

measurements to analyze rotor and stator health. Using a combination of online and 

offline tests to form a six fault zone approach offers a more complete analysis of motor health. Power Quality focuses on the quality of the voltage and current. Power Circuit

focuses on the power circuit supplying power to the motor. The Stator Fault Zone focuses

on the turn-to-turn insulation and internal coil connections. The Air Gap Fault Zone

refers to the quality of the air gap between the rotor and the stator. The Insulation FaultZone refers to the winding to ground insulation. The Rotor Fault Zone refers to the health

of the rotor cage and laminations. All six fault zones should be analyzed to accurately

assess the overall health of a motor.

Page 93: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 93/120

 

NOTES

Page 94: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 94/120

 

 B B r rii d  d  g gii n n g g t t h hee GG a a p p ii n n M  M  a aii n n t tee n n a a n n c cee W W  o o r r k k f  f  o o r r c cee 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  p peer r ssoonn 

MMaar r ttyy BBr r iid d ggeess,, EEPPR R II 

WWeed d nneessd d aayy,, 88::0000 aamm -- 99::3300 aamm 

Page 95: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 95/120

Use of the ORSIM Model for Improvement of Nuclear Power

Plant Operations

Michael W. Golay

Massachusetts Institute of Technology1617 253 5824/ [email protected]

 ABSTRACT

During the past year the Operations Risk Simulator (ORSIM) model of nuclear power  plant organizational performance has been used in a pilot project at a Four-unit CANDU

nuclear power plant. The purpose of the project was to determine whether use of this

model is feasible and compatible with the limited planning resources typical of nuclear  power plants under current competitive conditions, and to determine whether it could 

 provide valuable insights for improving operational performance. The experience was asuccess in terms of both criteria. The resource requirements for adapting PWR-based 

original version of the ORSIM model to a CANDU application were found to be modest

(< 1 man-month, and negligible computational costs), and the insights provided wereuseful to the plant managers in understanding the causes of observed performance

declines, and in choosing among alternative proposals for improving the efficiency of the power plant’s organization.

The ORSIM model was developed using the System Dynamics technique for capturingthe domain expertise of the team operating a two-unit PWR plant in the United States.

Briefly, this technique utilizes the methods of engineering control theory to describe theoperations of an organization as the result of the interactions of the organization’s groups

 performing their individual tasks and supporting each other. It is especially capable of 

describing the nonlinear amplifications (the “ripple” effect) of these interactions

depending upon the degree to which these interactions are harmonious. It is useful for identifying operational vulnerabilities, conditions that will lead to progressive-and-then-catastrophic decline and ways to improve performance. A major product of a simulation

using this model is the time-dependent material condition of the plant, and the

corresponding electrical production and associated risks. The ORSIM team plans next to

start another pilot project at a single-unit US PWR.

Page 96: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 96/120

 

NOTES

Page 97: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 97/120

 

EPRI LOOKS TO BROADEN THE REACH OF TASK PROFICIENCY

EVALUATION PROGRAM

Ken Huffman

EPRI

704-547-6055

[email protected]

 ABSTRACT

Doug Gipson has challenged the EPRI staff and me to provide additional value from existing EPRI products and 

services with minimal or no additional cost to the membership. In responding to his request, one program I amconvinced we can extract enhanced value is EPRI’s Task Proficiency Evaluation (TPE) program. The TPE

 program was designed to assist nuclear power plants in assuring that their internal and supplemental work force

have the required knowledge and skills necessary to safely and efficiently accomplish assigned maintenance tasks.

Given the replacement workforce issues being discussed in many forums across our industry, EPRI is rethinking

our approach to the present TPE program. But, EPRI’s efforts alone are not sufficient! The information below

 provides a vision for an industry-wide collaborative that can address some aspects of the challenges your staff faces

today regarding:

z  Work Force Aging and Turnover 

z  Supplemental Personnel Performance

z  Cost effective training

We are working with our members, NEI, INPO, and others to identify what ‘next steps’ will be most helpful and 

what the business case looks like.

Background

Before beginning independent work on a specific task in a nuclear plant, individuals must possess the required 

knowledge and skills of that task. The skilled trades have historically prepared supplemental workers withspecialized skills and knowledge of nuclear plant maintenance tasks. To ensure that supplemental personnel have

the required qualifications (knowledge and skills), the plants options include items such as resume reviews,

subjective interviews, or pre-outage training and testing. The latter although effective, is costly and oftenrepetitive, from plant-to-plant and outage-to-outage. Costly on-site training is frequently the least timely and least

desirable.

The TPE program was designed and developed to assist nuclear power plants in assuring their internal and 

supplemental work force have the required knowledge and skills necessary to safely and efficiently accomplish

assigned maintenance tasks. The program process identifies and develops critical maintenance related task 

evaluation tools and maintains a task qualification registry. Program oversight and operation is maintained through

a chartered TPE Users Group made up of interested EPRI member utilities, national labor unions and associated 

maintenance contractors.

Specific evaluation tools (written and performance tests) applicable

to each identified critical maintenance task were identified. A subset

has been fully developed, but it is about a third of the 147 total tasksidentified by the TPE Users Group. The main emphasis was placed on

outage related maintenance tasks routinely performed by contracted 

 personnel. This resulted in the program participants expanding to

include the major Building and Construction Trades Department

(BCTD) labor unions. Their involvement was a natural extension of 

EPRI’s participation in the development and implementation of the

 Nuclear Mechanic Apprenticeship Program (NMAP) where the bulk of 

TPE Evaluation Process 

Task-Specific Evaluation Modules• Knowledge – Written Examination 

• Skills – “Hands-On” PerformanceEvaluation 

Supporting Elements 

• Technical Working Group /

Systematic Approach to Training

(SAT)

• Test Item Bank

• Task Qualification Registry

the utility supplemental work force is gleaned.

Page 98: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 98/120

 

NOTES

Page 99: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 99/120

Maintenance Excellence Program: Capturing Knowledge to Train a

Replacement Workforce

Bernie Cook Joe Mosteller 

Progress Energy PSEG Power 

Phone: 919-546-7738 Phone: 908-412-7019 [email protected]  [email protected]

 

 ABSTRACT

The power generation industry has changed significantly as a result of the competitive market and increased 

electricity demand, requiring an elevated level of staff proficiency. Many companies in the industry have

indicated they are also confronted by retirement of an aging experienced workforce and creating competent

replacement workers. To meet these demands, it is critical to assure maintenance staff are prepared with the

knowledge and skills to perform their jobs effectively, and to accelerate the time to competency of 

replacement staff. This paper will address the creation of a Maintenance Excellence Program (MEP) to meet

the craft training needs at Progress Energy and PSEG Power. There are three primary elements to a

successful implementation of an MEP program; 

1.  Capturing the knowledge of experienced workers before they leave. Creating an environment to

encourage workers to share their experiences, identifying and prioritizing knowledge to be captured 

that is critical to success of the plant, and implementing processes to capture and convert

knowledge into useful training content.

2.  Creation of a knowledge warehouse as craft training content. The knowledge warehouse is crafted 

as unit specific training content; and includes component knowledge descriptions, theory of how

equipment works, procedural based skills, associated references and procedures, and 

comprehensive maintenance work packages for key components.

3.  Automating training delivery with the PlantView Automated Training Manager (ATM). The ATMis a comprehensive learning management system for the economical delivery of training that also

 provides progression profiling, training enrolment and delivery, competency evaluation, access to

associated references, and training administration. It empowers MEP coordinators with the ability

to create the knowledge and training content, copy it between plants, and edit them to be site

specific MEP packages. The ATM is simple to use for the Maintenance Managers to manage their 

staff training and qualification progression from entry level to journeyman.

The MEP helps plant managers ensure maintenance staff are prepared with the knowledge and skills to

maintain its facilities at the highest level of reliability, efficiency, and safety.

Page 100: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 100/120

 

NOTES

Page 101: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 101/120

Business / Education Partnerships –Solution for the future of the aging energy

industry workforce

Sally Nadler, PSEG Power 

Mailing address: PSEG Fossil Training Group,

4000 Hadley Road, MC 431, South Plainfield, NJ 07080

Phone: 908-412-7039, Fax: 908-754-8696Email address: [email protected]

 

 ABSTRACT

We propose a presentation on a landmark workforce development initiative that PSEG has implemented here

in the State of New Jersey in partnership with some of our local community colleges entitled the Energy

Utility Technology Associate Degree Program. This is a fully accredited Associate Degree program in

Energy Utility Technology from Mercer County Community College or Essex County College, managed in

 partnership with PSEG. The program has been recognized as a workforce development strategy that works.

The program was conceived in response to what some experts are predicting will be a major staffing crisis

for the energy industry due to a significant number of craft and technical workers becoming eligible for 

retirement in the next decade, and a growing need for a more highly skilled and better educated workforce.

PSE&G, and now PSEG Power’s fossil generation business, have begun to realize the benefits of workforce

 planning via this program launched 27 month’s ago to address the pending employment gap and generate

renewed interest in technical trade careers.

“When we started the Energy Utility Technology Associate Degree Program with Mercer County

Community College, we weren’t quite sure what the response would be,” explains Dana DeYoung, PSEG

director of Talent Management. “Now – two-years later, we have six graduates, 18 students hired, 40

currently enrolled, two community colleges and PSEG Fossil participating in the program. We‘re just

 beginning to see the potential of this program.”

As a result of Fossil’s participation, four energy utility technology degree students will be getting an up close

and personal view of what it’s like to work in a power plant, when they participate in summer internships at

Mercer Generating Station in Hamilton Township. According to Alan Bassham, PSEG Power, manager – technical training, an introductory power plant operations and maintenance course developed by his training

staff, and approved as a program elective, will prepare the students for the experience by providing them

with the basic knowledge and skills they need for safe power plant operation and maintenance.

“We realized we needed to take a more aggressive approach to attracting and recruiting new talent into entry-

level technical positions within our power generation business,” says Bassham. “Like the utility, many of 

our folks will be retiring and quite frankly – you don’t see a lot of young people pursuing employment in

 power plants. I’m confident that this program will help start to bridge this gap by both educating and 

exposing students to career opportunities that are available in our business.”

The creation and implementation of this program had enabled PSEG to create strategic Business/EducationPartnerships with select educational organizations in the state to increase the diversity and competence for 

candidates in our job pool and provide a solution to the potential impacts of the aging energy workforce. The presentation for the EPRI Conference on International Maintenance will focus on:

*  An overview of the Energy Utility Technology Associate Degree Program,

*  Development and implementation of the program

*  Highlights of the results achieved thus far through recorded testimonials from the program

 participants,

*  Expansion of the program within the generation organization in the operations and 

maintenance areas.

Page 102: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 102/120

 

NOTES

Page 103: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 103/120

 

 P P a a n neel l SSee s s s sii o o n n W W  o o r r k k f  f  o o r r c cee T T  r r a a n n s sii t tii o o n n T T ee c c h h n niiqquuee s s a a n n d  d  

SS o ol l uu t tii o o n n s s 

SSeessssiioonn CChhaaiir r  p peer r ssoonn 

R R aayyCChhaamm b beer r ss,,EEPPR R II 

WWeed d nneessd d aayy,, 1100::3300 aamm -- 1111::4455 aamm 

Page 104: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 104/120

 

NOTES

Page 105: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 105/120

 

NOTES

Page 106: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 106/120

 

NOTES

Page 107: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 107/120

 

NOTES

Page 108: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 108/120

FFiif f tthh EEPPR R II IInntteer r nnaattiioonnaall 

CCoonnf f eer r eennccee oonn MMaaiinntteennaannccee 

AAuugguusstt 88--99,, 22000055 

 E E x x h hii b bii t t o o r r s s 

Vendor Booth Vendor Booth

EST Group 207 Stork H&E Turbo Blading 102

Margan, Inc 211 Reliabilityweb.com 305

Climax Portable MachineTools, Inc. 314 & 316 Plastocor 110

Conforma Clad, Inc. 210 The Atlantic Group 112

Hunting Pipeline Services 209 Insert Key Solutions 100

Conco Systems, Inc. 206 Innov-x Systems 310

Pilgrim International 312 PdMA Corporation 304

Alaron Corporation 300 Babcock Power 306

Baker Instrument Company 111 Analysts, Inc. 201

QuantaPoint 107 SDT

Partsmaster 313 UE Systems 302

Page 109: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 109/120

 

 Name of Company Insert Key Solutions, Inc.

Contact Name: Robert Hammaker Title: Director of Equipment Reliability

Address: 106 Commons Court Chadds Ford, PA 19317Phone: 610.459.4400

Fax: 610.459.4994

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.insertkey.com

Insert Key Solutions, Inc. (IKS) delivers web-based solutions for businesses of all sizes, from Fortune 500 companiesto start-ups. IKS has developed a suite of web-based products that are designed to improve and automate PlantEquipment Reliability (ER). The ER Suite was developed by incorporating industry best practices, regulatoryguidelines, and input and experience from a broad customer base. The entire suite of products is web-based and

incorporates the latest technologies. The suite of products includes:

IQTemplatesTM – PM\PCM Template management including tasks, frequencies, ownership, and revision control.IQReviewTM – Component Classification, PM\PCM Template Association, Review against Current Practice, and an interface to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS).PlantIQ® – Component Health Reporting and Predictive Maintenance (PdM) integration including Performance Indicator automation.SystemIQTM – System Health Reporting, Action Plan Generation, and data integration including Quarterly Reporting Requirements.PAM ManagerTM – Just-In-Time Work Order Review and Proactive Maintenance Craft Feedback Review. Data integration and Performance Indicator automation.Ranking Index or Orders (RIO)TM – Work Order Prioritization and ranking through automated data integration.ER DashboardTM – Centralized Equipment Reliability Performance Indicators with drill-down into Supporting 

 Applications.SmartSealTM – Valve and Pump design, sealing and packing material, and maintenance management.

 IKS has extensive experience in the power industry. Our Equipment Reliability Suite of products is installed in more than 60

nuclear and fossil plants across North America. 

 Exhibitor Booth #100 

 Name of Company STORK H&E TURBO BLADING

Contact Name: JOE WALKER Address: 334 COMFORT RD, ITHACA, NY 14850 USA

Phone: 607.351.7418

Fax: 607.277.1193E-mail [email protected]

Web Site WWW.HE-MACHINERY.COM

Stork H&E Turbo Blading is the largest and oldest independent turbo blading manufacturer in theworld. All OEM model steam turbines, gas turbine compressor, and axial compressor blades,

vanes, buckets, rotors, stators, nozzles and guide vanes are manufactured to ISO9000 & AS9000

standards. Stork supplies the global power generation industry, petrochemical, aviation, marine,

 pulp & paper, and other process industry turbine users.

 Exhibitor Booth #102 

Page 110: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 110/120

“What took Quantapoint under and hour to scan

could have taken a crew hours or days to

manually measure.”

Project Manager 

 Exelon

 Name of Company: Quantapoint, Inc. Contact Name: Eric Hale Title: Director of Business Development 

Address: 1531 London Court

Naperville, IL 60563

Phone: 630-778-0502 

Fax: 270-912-4596 

E-mail [email protected] 

Web Site www.quantapoint.com 

Quantapoint uses integrated laser scanning to provide the fastest, easiest and most cost-

effective solution for creating detailed and highly accurate as-built documentation for power  plants. With nearly 700 as-built laser documentation projects, including fossil-fuel and

nuclear power plants, Quantapoint rapidly collects, integrates and verifies billions of highly

accurate measurements to provide a consistent and complete “digitized plant” of easily

shareable as-built laser documentation – without data handoffs, purchasing costly hardware or 

time-consuming remodeling.

The digitized plant can include dimensionally accurate and photo-realistic 2D laser scans,

interactive 3D laser models and verified 2D drawings,

such as piping & instrumentation diagrams. It provides

more accurate and complete information for design,fabrication and construction decisions, with construction

rework being reduced by more than 80%.

 Exhibitor Booth #107 

Quantapoint 3D Laser Model (not CAD)

Share Across the Entire Team

Page 111: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 111/120

 

 Name of Company: Plastocor, Inc.

Contact Name: Jim MitchellTitle: Vice President

Address: 100 Research Road, Hingham MA 02043Phone: 724-942-0582

Fax: 724-942-0583

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site Plastocor.com

Plastocor, Inc provides turnkey coating applications for main surface condensers and balance of 

 plant heat exchangers. Services include; Tubesheet Cladding, Tube-end and Full-Length TubeCoating, Waterbox and Circ. Pipe Coatings, Flange and Expansion Joint Sealing. Benefits include

adding unparalleled reliability and availability by sealing tube-to-tubesheet joint leaks, eliminatingshell side 0

2problems, and providing corrosion protection. Virtual flawless performance record 

for over nineteen (19) years; 900 TUBESHEETS CLADDED, SIX (6) MILLION TUBE-ENDS

COATED AND 300 WATERBOXES COATED; EXTENDED WARRANTEE PROVIDED. 

 Exhibitor Booth #110

BAKER INSTRUMENT COMPANY 

 Name of Company Baker Instrument CompanyContact Name: Scott Lebruska

Title: NE Regional Sales Manager 

Address: 4812 McMurry Ave, Ft Collins CO 80525Phone: 970-282-1200

Fax: 970-282-1010

E-mail [email protected] Site www.bakerinst.com

The leader in insulation test technologies, Baker’s are industry standard for predictivemaintenance and motor rebuilders.

These instruments compile information via in-service and traditional static testing. In-service

equipment searches for power, torque, overcurrents, load, efficiency and other problems within the

running motor. This monitor can be connected via a safe connection at the MCC, quicklydetermining problems apparent within the motor process.

Static equipment tests for weaknesses in the windings, coils, or leads. They simulate spikesassociated with startup, finding problems that are above operating voltage. This allows time to

repair or replace equipment on your schedule not the machinery’s.

 Exhibitor Booth #111

Page 112: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 112/120

 

 Name of Company: The Atlantic Group

Contact Name: Joy Jacob

Title: Marketing SpecialistAddress: 5426 Robin Hood Road, Norfolk, VA 23513

Phone: (800) 446-8131 x439Fax: (757) 233-7491

E-mail: [email protected]

Web Site: www.atlanticgroup.com

The Atlantic Group serves the power generating industry world-wide with specialized 

maintenance and modification services and personnel, including Condenser Services (retubing,

leak detection, tube cleaning) and products (Cradle-Lock ® Anti-Vibration Stakes, S-Flex® 

Expansion Joint System, Acc-U-Clean® adjustable tube cleaners, and Hydrokinetic™ Cleaning),

complete Valve and Valve Operator Servicing capabilities, Maintenance and ModificationServices, Maintenance Integration™, Turbine Services, Radiological Protection Services, and Support Services (Staff Augmentation, Technical/Professional personnel, and Craft Labor).

 Exhibitor Booth #112

 Name of Company Analysts Inc.

Contact Name: Greg J. LivingstoneTitle: General Manager 

Address: 2441 W. 205th

Street, Suite C100,

Torrance, CA 90501Phone: 520-990-3502

Fax: 520-844-3000

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.analystsinc.com

Analysts Inc is the nation’s oldest, most experienced commercial oil laboratory. They are ISO

9001 and NRC 10 CFR Appendix B approved. In addition to a wide range of standard testingcapabilities, Analysts is at the forefront of research on turbine oil degradation. They havedeveloped unique testing technologies specifically designed to maximize the life and performance

of power generation lubricants.

 Exhibitor Booth #201

Page 113: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 113/120

 

Name of Company: Conco Systems, Inc.Contact Name: Sharon L. Springer Title: Marketing AssistantAddress: 530 J ones Street, Verona, PA 15147Phone: 412-828-1166Fax: 412-826-8255E-mail: [email protected] Site: www.concosystems.com

Conco Systems is recognized throughout the power industry as the world leader forquality cleaning of condensers and heat exchangers. Conco supplies exclusivetechnology for; tube cleaning, tube cleaning services, leak detection services, EddyCurrent testing, condenser performance analysis, and tube plugging. In addition, Concois introducing the latest technology for cleaning air-cooled condensers: the j & w® cleaning system with a patented nozzle beam for optimal cleaning. Conco also has acomplete line of HydroDrills designed by Global Heat Exchanger Services for cleaningheat exchanger tubes in power, petrochemical, and refining facilities.

 Exhibitor Booth #206 

 Name of Company: EST Group 

Contact Name: Hank Brandenberger Title: General sales manager 

Address: 334 Godshall Drive 

Harleysville, Pa 19438

Phone: 215-513-4300 

Fax: 215-513-4333 E-mail: [email protected] 

Web Site: www.expansionseal.com 

EST Group provides a complete range of repair products, services and replacement parts,

(including replacement units) covering the life cycle of tubular heat exchangers and condensers;additionally EST Group provides products and services to facilitate pressure testing pipe, piping

systems, pressure vessels and their components.

 Exhibitor Booth #207 

Page 114: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 114/120

 

 Name of Company: Hunting Pipeline ServicesContact Name: John Charest

Title: Vice President and General Manager Address: 860 Prospect Hill Road,

Windsor, CT 06095

Phone: 888-538-6030Fax: 513-771-2333

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.huntingsp.com

Hunting Pipeline Services provides cost-effective solutions for the rehabilitation of water, sewer,

gas, power plant and industrial process pipelines using trenchless technologies.

 Exhibitor Booth #209

 Name of Company Conforma Clad Contact Name: Chris Harley

Title: Sr. Applications Engineer Address: 501 Park East Boulevard, New Albany, IN 47150

Phone: 812-948-2118

Fax: 812-944-3254E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.conformaclad.com

Conforma Clad’s infiltration brazed tungsten carbide cladding extends equipment runtime between

outages by protecting burners, pulverizers, fans, and ash equipment against erosion, abrasion,

corrosion, and impact at severely elevated temperatures.

 Exhibitor Booth # 210

Pipeline Services

Page 115: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 115/120

 

 Name of Company Margan, Inc.Contact Name: Dan Ezra

Title: President

Address: PO Box 81467 , Atlanta, GA 30366Phone: 770-936-5848

Fax: 770-936-5849

E-mail [email protected] Site www.margan.com

Margan specializes in the online inspection of High Energy Piping by QAE NDI or QuantitativeAcoustic Emissions Non-Destructive Inspection. We listen to the integrity of High Energy Piping

during operation to detect flaws at their earliest stages, long before they become failures.

 Exhibitor Booth #211

 Name of Company Alaron CorporationContact Name: Steve Ferguson

Title: Vise President, Business Development & Marketing

Address: 2138 State Route 18, Wampum PA 16157Phone: 513-583-1744

Fax: 513-583-8505

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site alaron-nuclear.com

Alaron, together with our teaming partners, has become a ‘one-stop shop’ for all your nuclear 

service needs. Alaron provides a variety of services including; equipment storage, facility-spaceleasing, waste processing (wet and dry), asset recovery, service level one coatings and 

refurbishment of both safety and non-safety related components (pumps, motors including

RCPM’s).

 Exhibitor Booth #300

Page 116: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 116/120

 

 Name of Company UE SYSTEMS INC.

Contact Name: MARK GOODMANTitle: VP ENGINEERING

Address: 14 HAYES STREET, ELMSFORD NY 10523Phone: 800-223-1325

Fax: 914-347-2181

E-mail [email protected] Site WWW.UESYSTEMS.COM

ULTRASONIC INSTRUMENTS FOR LEAK DETECTION, ELECTRICAL INSPECTION

AND MECHANICAL INSPECTION.

 Exhibitor Booth #302

 Name of Company PdMA CorporationContact Name: Kim Osterman

Title: Sales & Marketing Coordinator 

Address: 5909-C Hampton Oaks ParkwayTampa, FL 33610

Phone: 813-621-6463

Fax: 813-620-0206E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.pdma.com

PdMA Corporation provides the equipment, services and training to support electric motor 

reliability. Products include static and dynamic portable motor analyzers utilized in the conditionmonitoring of electric motors and circuits. The MCE static tester provides a detailed analysis of motor and circuit condition. The EMAX tester collects data while the motor is operating, giving you

the power and convenience only dynamic testing can provide. The MCEMAX integrates both

technologies into one comprehensive package. By combining the accuracy of motor and circuit

analysis and the convenience of power analysis, the user is given the information necessary toevaluate all six potential fault zones: power circuit, stator, rotor, air gap, insulation and power 

quality. Services include oil analysis, motor circuit analysis and motor power analysis.

 Exhibitor Booth #304

Page 117: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 117/120

 

 Name of Company Reliabilityweb.comContact Name: Terrence O’Hanlon

Title: Publisher 

Address: PO Box 07070 ,Fort Myers FL 33919 USA

Phone: (888) 575-1245 or (305) 735-3746 (Int’l)

Fax: (309) 423-7234E-mail [email protected]

Web Site http://www.reliabilityweb.com 

Information resources on the web at Reliabilityweb.com, Magazines such as RELIABILITY and 

Uptime, learning events such as PdM-2005, IMC-2005, LubricationWorld, EAM-2006, RCM-2006 and the Asia Pacific Maintenance Conference.

 Exhibitor Booth #305

 Name of Company Babcock Power Inc.

Contact Name: Steven SaboTitle: Director of Marketing & Communications

Address: 5 Neponset Street

Worcester, MA 01615-0040Phone: 508-854-3630

Fax: 508-854-7025

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.babcockpower.com

Babcock Power Inc., through its various subsidiaries, is a leading worldwide supplier of 

technology, equipment, and aftermarket services for heat exchangers, HRSGs, steam generators,fuel firing equipment, and environmental products for the power generation, industrial, and waste-

to-energy markets.

 Exhibitor Booth #306 

Page 118: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 118/120

 

 Name of Company Innov – X Systems

Contact Name: Janice Iaquinto

Title: Sales and Marketing Coordinator Address: 10 Gill St.

Phone: 781-938-5005

Fax: 781-938-0128

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.innovxsys.com

Innov – X Systems specializes in portable XRF equipment. Our Alpha Series is the smallest and 

lightest in world. Please contact us for more information.

 Exhibitor Booth #310

 Name of Company Pilgrim International Limited Contact Name: Mr. Tom Kennedy

Title: Sales Manager 

Address: Southlink, Oldham, OL4 1DEPhone: + 44 161 785 7700

Fax: + 44 161 785 7777

E-mail [email protected] Web Site www.pilgrim-international.co.uk 

Pilgrim International provides coupling bolting technology to turbine manufacturers andpower stations worldwide.

Pilgrims products and associated services improve efficiency and reliability of the plants

operation and ensure the elimination of problems associated with conventional coupling

bolts.

 Exhibitor Booth #312

Page 119: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 119/120

 

 Name of Company: Partsmaster 

Contact Name: Brian McCoy

Title: Strategic Account Manager Address: 2727 Chemsearch Blvd.

Irving, TX 75062

Phone: 972-438-0613

Fax: 972-721-6868E-mail: [email protected]

Web Site: www.partsmaster.com

Partsmaster manufactures and distributes X-Ergon specialty welding alloys and cutting torches,

Wear-X high strength hard facing electrodes, CryoTool high performance cutting tools and drill

 bits, WearFlex conveyor and off road tire sidewall patching and repair systems and MegaMetals

ceramic anti-wear abrasion polymeric coatings.

 Exhibitor Booth #313

 Name of Company Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc.Contact Name: Andrew Becker Title: Director of Strategic Development and Marketing

Address: 2712 E. Second Street Newberg, OR 97132

Phone: 503-538-2185Fax: 503-538-7600

E-mail [email protected]

Web Site www.cpmt.com

Based in Oregon, C limax Portable Machine Tools is a full service provider of on-site

machining solutions. The Company offers spec ialized engineering consulting services,

customized training programs and a comprehensive line of portable machine toolsenabling customers to quickly perform a variety of on-site machining proc edures. Climax

offers a broad selection of standardized portable machine tools, as well as a range of 

custom-built solutions based on extensive experience within the power generation

industry. Climax Portable Machine Tools serves domestic and international markets

through both its own international offices and via licensed representatives in 23 countries.

 Exhibitor Booth #314 & 316 

Page 120: 000000000001010270

7/27/2019 000000000001010270

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/000000000001010270 120/120

 

Export Control Restrictions

Access to and use of EPRI Intellectual Property is

granted with the specific understanding and

requirement that responsibility for ensuring full

compliance with all applicable U.S. and foreign export

laws and regulations is being undertaken by you and

your company. This includes an obligation to ensurethat any individual receiving access hereunder who is

not a U.S. citizen or permanent U.S. resident is

permitted access under applicable U.S. and foreign

export laws and regulations. In the event you are

uncertain whether you or your company may lawfully

obtain access to this EPRI Intellectual Property, you

acknowledge that it is your obligation to consult with

your company’s legal counsel to determine whether

this access is lawful. Although EPRI may make

available on a case-by-case basis an informal

assessment of the applicable U.S. export classification

for specific EPRI Intellectual Property, you and your

company acknowledge that this assessment is solely

for informational purposes and not for reliance

purposes. You and your company acknowledge that it

is still the obligation of you and your company to make

your own assessment of the applicable U.S. export

classification and ensure compliance accordingly. You

and your company understand and acknowledge your

obligations to make a prompt report to EPRI and the

appropriate authorities regarding any access to or use

of EPRI Intellectual Property hereunder that may be in

violation of applicable U.S. or foreign export laws or

regulations.

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), with

major locations in Palo Alto, California, and Charlotte,

North Carolina, was established in 1973 as an

independent, nonprofit center for public interest energy

and environmental research. EPRI brings together

members, participants, the Institute’s scientists andengineers, and other leading experts to work

collaboratively on solutions to the challenges of electric

power. These solutions span nearly every area of

electricity generation, delivery, and use, including

health, safety, and environment. EPRI’s members

represent over 90% of the electricity generated in the

United States. International participation represents

nearly 15% of EPRI’s total research, development, and

demonstration program.

Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity