of 105
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
1/105
The futures of safety,
compensation and recovery:
Final report on theFutures Research Initiative
Fawkes S, Palmer J, Inayatullah S, Burke R, Miller M, Worland P, Ellis N
Institute for Safety, Compensation
and Recovery Research Futures Workshop
27 October 2010
Queens Hall, Parliament House, Melbourne
August 2011Research Report # 0811-017-R2
Accompanying documents to this report
Title Report number
The futures of safety, compensation and
recovery A brief report on the Futures
Research Initiative
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
2/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 2of 105
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ....................................................................................... 5
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 7
2. INTRODUCTION AND AIMS .................................................................................... 8
3. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 9
4. METHODS .............................................................................................................. 11
4.1 OVERVIEW 11
4.2 METHODS: HORIZON SCANNING PROJECT 12
4.2.1 DATA MINING 12
4.2.2 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 15
4.3 METHODS: STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROJECT 15
4.3.1 WARM UP WORKSHOPS 15
4.3.2 ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS) 15
4.3.3 FUTURES WORKSHOP: OVERVIEW 184.3.4 FUTURES WORKSHOP: INTRODUCTION 18
4.3.5 FUTURES WORKSHOP: EXPLANATION OF FUTURES THINKING 19
4.3.6 FUTURES WORKSHOP: VIDEO 19
4.3.7 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FISHBOWL 19
4.3.8 FUTURES WORKSHOP: REPORT ON ONLINE BLOG DISCUSSIONS 20
4.3.9 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FUTURES WHEEL EXERCISE, SCENARIODEVELOPMENT AND BACKCASTING 20
4.3.10 FUTURES WORKSHOP: PRIORITY RESEARCH QUESTIONS 22
4.4 METHODS: ISCRR ANALYSIS AND REPORTS 23
5. RESULTS OF HORIZON SCANNING PROJECT ................................................. 23
5.1 DATA MINING 23
5.2 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 24
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
3/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 3of 105
6.0 RESULTS OF STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROJECT ....................................... 24
6.1 ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS) 24
6.2 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FUTURES WHEELS AND SCENARIOS 266.2.1 GROUP 1: DIVERSITY IS EMBRACED, PEOPLE ARE MORE VALUABLE27
6.2.2 GROUP 2: NEW WAYS OF ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISKS 29
6.2.3 GROUP 3: GREATER FOCUS ON EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL NEEDS 32
6.2.4 GROUP 4: 30% OF SCHEME BUDGET IS PREVENTION 36
6.2.5 GROUP 5: BROADER WAYS OF MEASURING SUCCESS IN IMPROVINGHEALTH OF SOCIETY 39
6.2.6
GROUP 6: UNIVERSAL CARE FOR SUPPORT AND DISABILITY 41
6.2.7 GROUP 7: EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS BASED ON TRUST 45
6.2.8 GROUP 8: NEW PARTNERSHIPS AND RELATIONSHIPS IN THE SYSTEM TARGETED PROVIDERS 49
6.3 EMERGING KNOWLEDGE NEEDS AND PRIORITY RESEARCH AREAS 52
6.3.1 INTERVENTION RESEARCH 52
6.3.2 INDICATORS AND MEASURES 53
6.3.3 SOCIAL RESEARCH 546.3.4 TRANSLATION RESEARCH 54
6.3.5 SYSTEM CAPACITY RESEARCH 54
6.3.6 SUMMARY 54
7. RESULTS OF ISCRR ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION .......................................... 55
7.1 INTRODUCTION 55
7.2 ANALYSIS OF HORIZON SCANNING PROJECT 55
7.3 ANALYSIS OF ONLINE BLOG DISCUSSIONS 57
7.4 OVERVIEW OF STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE SCENARIOS 58
7.5 BIG IDEAS EMERGING FROM SCENARIOS 59
7.6 PREVENTIVE VERSUS COMPENSATION FOCUS IN TIMES OF BOOM ANDBUST 61
7.7 PARTNERSHIPS VERSUS GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF
BOOM AND BUST 63
7.8 FUTURES OF SAFETY, COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY IN A NATIONALAND GLOBAL CONTEXT 66
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
4/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 4of 105
8. FUTURES RESEARCH INITIATIVE: METHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT .............. 68
8.1 EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGY IN DEVELOPING NEW KNOWLEDGE 68
8.2 EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGY IN PROMOTING STAKEHOLDERENGAGEMENT 70
9. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 71
10. APPENDICES ......................................................................................................... 72
APPENDIX 1.METHODOLOGY USING THE SIX PILLARS OF STRATEGICFORESIGHT 73
APPENDIX 2.EXAMPLE OF AN ONLINE DISCUSSION SCREEN (OHS BLOG) 76
APPENDIX 3.STRUCTURE FOR ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS) SUMMARIES 77
APPENDIX 4.SYNOPSIS OF BLOGS 78
APPENDIX 5.FUTURES WORKSHOP PROGRAM 80
APPENDIX 6.LIST OF FUTURES WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS 82
APPENDIX 7.WELCOME LETTER FROM ISCRR BOARD CHAIR 87
APPENDIX 8.PURPOSES OF SCENARIOS 88
APPENDIX 9.THREE SCENARIO METHODS 89
APPENDIX 10. STEPS IN CONSTRUCTING FUTURES WHEELS 91
APPENDIX 11. PARTICIPATION IN ONLINE DISCUSSIONS 92
APPENDIX 12. RESEARCH QUESTIONS IN ORDER OF VOTES RECEIVED 93
APPENDIX 13. RESEARCH QUESTIONS NOT PUT UP FOR VOTING 95
APPENDIX 14.RESEARCH QUESTIONS CLASSIFIED BY DOMAIN OF RESEARCH * 96
APPENDIX 15. FEEDBACK FORM - ISCRR FUTURES WORKSHOP 98
APPENDIX 16. SUMMARY OF ISCRR FUTURES WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
101
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
5/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 5of 105
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
FIGURE 1. METHODOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ................................................................................. 9FIGURE 2. PATH OF KNOWLEGE FLOWS IN THE FUTURES RESEARCH INITIATIVE ............ 10
FIGURE 3. CONTINUUM OF FUTURES STUDIES METHODS .................................................... 11
FIGURE 4. OVERVIEW OF FUTURES RESEARCH INITIATIVE ACTIVITIES .............................. 12
TABLE 1. THOUGHT LEADERS FOR ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS) .................................... 16
FIGURE 5. GROUP 1: FUTURES WHEEL ...................................................................................... 27
FIGURE 6. GROUP 1: FUTURES OF THE SAFETY, COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY
SYSTEM - EMBRACING DIVERSITY ............................................................................................. 28FIGURE 7. GROUP 2: FUTURES WHEEL ...................................................................................... 30
FIGURE 8. GROUP 2: FUTURES OF ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISKS .............................. 31
FIGURE 9. GROUP 3: FUTURES WHEEL ...................................................................................... 34
FIGURE 10. GROUP 3: FUTURES OF EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL NEEDS IN SAFETY,
COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 35
FIGURE 11. GROUP 3: BACKCASTING - EMBRACING EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL NEEDS IN
COMPENSATION BY 2035 .............................................................................................................. 36
FIGURE 12. GROUP 4: FUTURES WHEEL .................................................................................... 37
FIGURE 13. GROUP 4: FUTURES OF THE COMPENSATION SCHEME BUDGET FOR
PREVENTION ................................................................................................................................... 38
FIGURE 14. GROUP 5: FUTURES WHEEL .................................................................................... 40
FIGURE 15. GROUP 5: FUTURES OF MEASUREMENT OF SUCCESS IN IMPROVING HEALTH
OF SOCIETY ..................................................................................................................................... 41
FIGURE 16. GROUP 6: FUTURES WHEEL .................................................................................... 42
FIGURE 17. GROUP 6: FUTURES OF UNIVERSAL CARE FOR SUPPORT AND DISABILITY .. 43FIGURE 18. GROUP 7: FUTURES WHEEL .................................................................................... 46
FIGURE 19. GROUP 7: FUTURES OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS BASED ON TRUST .. 47
FIGURE 20. GROUP 7: FUTURES OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS BASED ON TRUST .. 47
FIGURE 21. GROUP 7: FUTURES OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS BASED ON TRUST: A
DAY IN THE LIFE .............................................................................................................................. 48
FIGURE 22. GROUP 8: FUTURES WHEEL .................................................................................... 50
FIGURE 23. GROUP 8: FUTURES OF PARTNERSHIPS AND RELATIONSHIPS IN THE SYSTEM........................................................................................................................................................... 51
FIGURE 24. GROUP 8: BACKCASTING ......................................................................................... 52
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
6/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 6of 105
FIGURE 25. GLOBAL FUTURES: PROACTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE .......................................... 56
FIGURE 26. GLOBAL FUTURES: COOPERATIVE VERSUS INTERESTS-BASED ..................... 56
FIGURE 27. GLOBAL FUTURES AND BLOG THEMES................................................................. 57
FIGURE 28. BEST AND WORST CASE SCENARIOS ................................................................... 58
FIGURE 29. SAFETY, COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY FUTURES: PREVENTIVE VERSUS
REACTIVE ......................................................................................................................................... 63
FIGURE 30. SAFETY, COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY FUTURES: PARTNERSHIP VERSUS
GOVERNMENT-LED ........................................................................................................................ 65
FIGURE 31. PREVENTIVE PARTNERSHIPS AND BLOG THEMES ............................................. 66
FIGURE 32. INTERSECTION OF PREFERRED GLOBAL FUTURES AND SAFETY,
COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY FUTURES AT BLOG THEMES ............................................ 67
FIGURE 33: PATHWAY FROM UNSHARED KNOWLEDGE TO CONSTRUCTED KNOWLEDGE
EMBEDDED IN SCENARIO BUILDING ........................................................................................... 69
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
7/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 7of 105
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The ISCRR Futures Research Initiative has been designed to provide a rich information
context and opportunity for debate for its stakeholders about knowledge needs in safety,
compensation and recovery over the next 25 years.
Information on national and global trends and futures writing across 11 areas of interest
was generated by a Horizon Scanning Project. From over a million references, this project
selected 183 articles which considered trends and possible futures and factors which
shape them, including the underlying worldviews and myths.
The 183 articles became the catalyst for the first stage in the Stakeholder Dialogue project
- 11 online discussions (blogs) involving invited contributors. The outcomes of these
discussions were analyzed by ISCRR and generated themes of critical significance to the
future of safety, compensation and recovery. These themes seeded discussions at a
Futures Workshop among a wide range of stakeholders, and the production of both
optimistic and pessimistic scenarios for the future of health and safety.
The Futures Workshop then addressed itself to the critical paths required to achieve the
scenarios preferred by participants, in which prevention was the focus and partnership was
the operating model. This process of backcasting laid the groundwork for developing
research questions to address the knowledge needs of a preferred future. Voting by
Workshop participants on the research questions they had generated showed a clear
priority for research on improving intervention policies and programs, ahead of developingnew indicators of health, identifying future social issues, translating research more
effectively and increasing capacity of systems in research and program delivery.
This report draws together the outcomes of the Horizon Scanning Project and the
Stakeholder Dialogue Project. ISCRR analysis of the Horizon Scanning Project is
presented within the framework of those global prospects most commonly considered in
the articles environmental crisis and hi-tech new world and the underlying drivers
most commonly identified - global cooperation versus pursuit of sectoral interests and
proactive versus reactive approaches to the future. In the Stakeholder Dialogue Project
the future context was generally characterised by participants as one of economic flux;
thus the scenarios generated in the Futures Workshop have been analyzed by ISCRRwithin the framework of economic boom and bust, together with and the underlying
drivers identified in the Workshop preventive approach versus reactive/compensation
focus, and a partnerships model versus government leadership.
The ISCRR analysis points to the intersection between alternative global futures and the
forces shaping them, and Futures Workshop participants' preferred futures of safety,
compensation and recovery and the means of achieving them. It is this intersection
across the nine themes which emerged from the blog discussions and which seeded the
Stakeholder Dialogue project that the Futures Research Initiative has opened up as the
context in which knowledge needs and research questions can be considered. The reportconcludes that, in each of these nine areas, there will be opportunities for developments at
the global level and those in Australian safety, compensation and recovery to inform and
engage with each other.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
8/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 8of 105
This report is a technical report, intended to be a repository of information about the
methodology and key results from the Initiative as a whole. It is not intended that it be
read by the audience for this work, but rather as a reference for future projects and those
interested in futures studies.
A number of other outputs have been produced for the audience for this work. These are:
ISCRR Futures Research Annotated Bibliography, October 2010
http://www.iscrr.com.au/files/news/Annotated_bibliography_21102010.pdf
Ellis N and Fawkes S. Drivers for futures in SCR: themes from blogs. Presentation at
ISCRR Futures Workshop, 27 October 2010, Parliament House, Melbourne
http://www.iscrr.com.au/futures_bibliog_pres.html
Past, present and future of WorkSafe Victoria and TAC, video presented at ISCRR
Futures Workshop, 27 October 2010
Horizon Scanning Project technical review, ISCRR Research Brief No: 1010-011-
R1B
Fawkes S, Palmer J, Inayatullah S, Burke R, Miller M, Worland P, Ellis N. The futures of
safety, compensation and recovery: A brief report on the Futures Research Initiative,
ISCRR, August 2011
Stylianou M. To strike a balance: A history of Victorias workers compensation scheme,
1985 2010. School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Faculty of Arts,
Monash University, ISCRR Research Report No: 0611-018-R1B
2. INTRODUCTION AND AIMS
ISCRR aims to maximize the potential impact of its research on safety, compensation and
recovery scheme performance by:
optimizing engagement with stakeholders in setting the research agenda;
conducting research; and
translating research into policy and practice.
A priority for ISCRR at present is to establish an agenda for research which will meet the
short and longer term knowledge needs of the Transport Accident Commission (TAC) and
WorkSafe Victoria (WorkSafe).
ISCRR's approach to achieving the above objectives has been to embark on the
development of the organisation as an international centre of excellence for futures studies
in safety, compensation and recovery, exemplified in the 2010-2011 Futures Research
Initiative.
This report on the Futures Research Initiative explains the exploration of global long-term
futures through the Horizon Scanning Project and the engagement of ISCRR stakeholders
in a Stakeholder Dialogue Project. The aim of the Initiative was to identify possible health
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
9/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 9of 105
and safety futures within a wider context, and the knowledge needs for realizing a
preferred future.
3. METHODOLOGY
The methodology of the Futures Research Initiative was consistent with general
approaches to futures studies projects. These involve gathering inputs (data and
information); undertaking (using selected futures studies methods) the linked processes of
analysis, interpretation and prospection; accompanied by futures studies 'products' such
as reports, presentations, workshop and multimedia (Voros, 2003)1.
Hence the ISCRR Futures Research Initiative is an integration of three components:
A Horizon Scanning Project to identify national and global trends relevant to
the future of safety, compensation and recovery
A Stakeholder Dialogue Project to engage key stakeholders and opinion
leaders in reviewing these broad trends and identifying trend drivers
(causes, worldviews and underlying myths), then exploring possible futures
for the safety, compensation and recovery sector over the next 25 years
and the knowledge needs of a preferred future.
Analysis and reports of these data by ISCRR.
The chronological sequence of these three components is illustrated in the following
diagram:
FIGURE 1. METHODOLOGICAL SEQUENCE
However the three main components are much more closely integrated than this sequence
suggests. At the heart of the methodology is an analysis and report to stakeholders
following a series of online (blog) discussions about the Horizon Scanning Project. This
analysis is the critical link which connects the Horizon Scanning Project and the
Stakeholder Dialogue Project in two ways:
by seeding discussions in the Stakeholder Dialogue process (nine blog
themes presented to the Futures Workshop)
1Voros,J.(2003).Agenericforesightprocessframework.Foresight5(3),1021
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
10/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 10of 105
through synthesising, at the end of the Futures Research Initiative, the
outputs from both the Horizon Scanning Project and the Stakeholder
Dialogue Project (the analysis presented in this Report).
The path of knowledge flows through the Initiative is shown in the following diagram, andprovides the framework for the analysis in this Report.
FIGURE 2. PATH OF KNOWLEGE FLOWS IN THE FUTURES RESEARCH INITIATIVE
The methodology for stakeholder engagement was designed by Professor Sohail
Inayatullah and Dr Robert Burke (in close association with ISCRR) using Inayatullah's
approach to strategic foresight2. This was based on the six pillars approach and 'linked
methodologies (see Appendix 1) to enable a systematic examination of drivers, trends andindicators, the articulation of alternative possible futures and the pathways to achieving
preferred futures.
One of the key ideas underpinning the methodology was that the techniques should allow
participants to delve beyond the 'official public description' of an issue (such as how a
compensation scheme works and how its effectiveness is assessed). Ideally, the
methodology would assist participants to recognise and describe structures and processes
in the system that directly shape performance and then go beyond this to questioning why
the system is structured and managed in this way. This last phase involves uncovering the
worldviews of those associated with creating and sustaining the system and at a deeperlevel, the notions embedded in society - 'metaphors and myths' - that support these
worldviews.
2Inayatullah,S.2008,'Sixpillars:futuresthinkingfortransforming',Foresight,vol.10,no.1,pp.421,
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
11/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 11of 105
4. METHODS
4.1 OVERVIEW
Methods were selected to provide and information-rich context for dialogue between
stakeholders responsible for decision making at a number of levels. The aim was to
explore uncertainties (and thus reveal potential areas for research) rather than try to
identify certainties. The methods included:
a horizon scanning data search and expert review to provide context
a series of participatory exercises with stakeholders and experts which
included online blog discussions, and a Futures Workshop with expert
presentations and discussion, mind mapping using the futures wheel, andscenario development and backcasting.
Each of these methods had a specific purpose related to the production of some form of
required knowledge on Ling's (2003) continuum (Figure 3) from 'soft' (intuitive/learning)
expertise to the hard analytical expertise.
FIGURE 3. CONTINUUM OF FUTURES STUDIES METHODS 3
ISCRR analysis and reports throughout the Initiative enabled the transitions between each
stage and the synthesis present in this Final Report.
An overview of the methods used in the Futures Research Initiative is represented in
Figure 4 below.
3Ling,T.(2003).ExAnteEvaluationandtheChangingPublicAuditFunction:TheScenarioPlanning
Approach.Evaluation,9(4),p447
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
12/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 12of 105
FIGURE 4. OVERVIEW OF FUTURES RESEARCH INITIATIVE ACTIVITIES
The methods used in each part of the Futures Research Initiative are briefly described
below.
4.2 METHODS: HORIZON SCANNING PROJECT
4.2.1 DATA MINING
The Horizon Scanning Project posed the following questions in a data search:
What are the global future trends in social, technological/scientific, economic,
environment, political, legal and ethical (STEEPLE) areas, and in health, work,transport, safety, compensation, recovery and knowledge transfer fields? (so-called
'PUSH' factors)
What is the current status of health, work, transport, safety, compensation,
recovery and knowledge transfer fields? ('WEIGHT' factors)
What are the preferred futures in health, work, transport, safety, compensation,
recovery and knowledge transfer fields? (PULL' factors)
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
13/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 13of 105
The criteria for selecting documents in the data search were deliberately broad, to ensure
all trends were captured which could impact on this sector. The broad criteria were as
follows: Topics related to STEEPLE, health, work, transport, safety, compensation,
recovery and knowledge transfer.
English language only
All countries
2006-current
Any data source (e.g. peer-reviewed articles, newspaper, websites, blogs)
Related to humans.
Ideas are said to follow a developmental path - from the seed, where few people are
talking about the idea and it may be discounted as radical, to where it becomes acceptedand implemented into practice. The aim of the sources strategies was to include sources
from these different stages in the development of ideas. These strategies were as follows.
Database search
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of research literature and quality web
sources covering nearly 18,000 titles from more than 5,000 publishers. This database
searches a number of different sources which are associated with different stages in idea
development.
Search terms used were related to (1) STEEPLE, health, work, transport, safety,compensation, recovery and knowledge transfer; and (2) PUSH, PULL, WEIGHT factors.
Expanding and refining the terms was an iterative process. Initially relevant terms were
listed. These were expanded by feedback from experts. A list of related/associated terms
and synonyms was then generated using WordNet. The user group to assess the
usefulness/appropriateness of each potential expanded term and selected a small number
of additional terms. Terms were combined in a number of ways. Initially all the STEEPLE
and other terms were combined with the Boolean operator OR. Then all the all PUSH,
PULL WEIGHT terms where combined with the Boolean operator OR. The collection of
STEEPLE etc terms were limited (Boolean operator AND) with the PUSH, PULL, WEIGHT
terms. This combination has limited by the years 2006, 2009 and 2010. This producednearly one million references. As it was only possible to download a maximum of 2,000
references, smaller searches where then conducted. Again the STEEPLE and other terms
were limited by the PUSH, PULL, WEIGHT terms.
A Google search was also conducted using the same search terms. Topic models and
prototypical documents were also produced from the resulting corpus and submitted for
review by the panel of experts.
Journal searches
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
14/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 14of 105
Futures journals, and occupational, health and safety journals were searched manually for
articles related to the three questions being asked. Future journals were searched for
articles related to STEEPLE, health, work, transport, safety, compensation, recovery and
knowledge transfer; occupational, health and safety journals were searched for articles
related to PUSH, PULL and WEIGHT.
Futures websites
Futures websites were manually searched for articles related to STEEPLE, health, work,
transport, safety, compensation, recovery and knowledge transfer.
Serendipity
Documents which were identified by associates or by people working on the project were
also included if appropriate.
Similarity search
As a result of the above processes, a corpus of potential documents was assembled. The
SCOPUS and Google corpuses were then scanned using TFIDF techniques to identify
documents that were similar to the documents that had been selected to date. These were
then submitted to the reference panel and further potential documents identified.
Gap search
A review by the reference panel of the documents found through this process identified a
number of gap areas that were not covered. A number of more specific Scopus and
Google searches were conducted to locate these specific areas.
For some of these searches the above computer technique was used to select key
documents for submission to the reference panel. For a number of searches that returned
small numbers of results, manual review was used to select documents for review.
To obtain the final set of articles, more than 600 documents were found by the above
strategies and were presented to experts at ISCRR for review. Out of this number, nearly
200 were selected for potential inclusion on the short list. These were generally chosen
independently by two reviewers and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion. This
collection of documents was subjected to topic modelling using the MALLET software with
models for 8, 10 and 12 topics considered. Topic descriptors (words which appearedfrequently in the documents) were identified for each topic. A discussion was held
regarding which words and topics best suited the objectives of the exercise. Informed by
these inputs, 11 topics were finally identified:
1. The future of disability and rehabilitation service delivery models
2. The future of health
3. The future of work
4. The future of individual responsibility versus the welfare state
5. The future of occupational health and safety
6. The future of technology
7. The future of sustainability8. The future of corporate social responsibility
9. The future of avoiding unintended harm in compensation systems
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
15/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 15of 105
10. The future of at risk sub groups
11. The future of transport.
Documents in these topics were further short listed. These documents were chosen to
select the most relevant that is, relating to local issues, recent, well-written, interestingand thought-provoking. There was also the aim of balancing academic articles with more
controversial articles. Synopses of the articles were prepared. Licensing and copyright
issues were addressed, applying for permission where necessary. On the Think Tank blog,
weblinks were provided for full text articles, or abstracts of the articles. For those few
articles unavailable as full text or abstract, a summary of the article was written.
4.2.2 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
An annotated bibliography of 183 articles selected from the Horizon Scan was prepared by
ISCRR for use in the online blog discussions and at the Futures Workshop.
4.3 METHODS: STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROJECT
4.3.1 WARM UP WORKSHOPS
Three warm up workshops were held to introduce key individuals to the Initiatives aims
and futures studies-based methodology. These were held for TAC, WorkSafe and Monash
University in order to:
provide staff in partner organisations with the opportunity to gain an understanding
of futures thinking
inform staff about the program
recruit interested staff to participate in the stakeholder dialogue.
4.3.2 ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS)
Blogs focussing on the 11 topic areas identified through horizon scanning were set up on
the ISCRR Futures Research website. The blog sites were designed to facilitate
participation by contributors. 'Thought Leaders' engaged to introduce the blogs and to
participate in discussion as a way of ensuring the initiative in general and the online
discussion were selected for their ability to think broadly and inspire others.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
16/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 16of 105
The Thought Leaders are listed in Table 1 below.
Online Discussion ThemeThought
LeaderPosition
Health Prof StephenLeeder
Director of the Menzies Centre for HealthPolicy, University of Sydney
Work Greg Tweedly CEO, WorkSafe
Occupational Health and Safety Dr Ben Amick Adjunct Scientist, Institute of Work and Health
Technology Prof Jim FalkDirector, Australian Centre for Science,Innovation and Society, University ofMelbourne
SustainabilityKathleenTownsend
Managing Director, Kathleen TownsendExecutive Solutions Pty Ltd
Transport David Anderson CEO, Ports Australia
At Risk Sub-groups Janet Dore CEO, Transport Accident Commission
Disability and RehabilitationServices
Anna BoothNon-Executive Chair, Slater & GordonLawyers - Specialist in workplace relations
Avoiding Unintended Harm inCompensation Systems
Prof Arno JAkkermans
Professor of Private Law, University ofAmsterdam
Corporate Social Responsibility Richard PriceSenior Principal, Natural Resources Group,Macquarie Capital Advisers Ltd
Individual Responsibility versusthe Welfare State
Prof EdwinaCornish
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research), MonashUniversity
TABLE 1. THOUGHT LEADERS FOR ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS)
Potential contributors were identified and personally invited by email or telephone to
access the site and take part in the blog discussion. They were emailed details for
accessing the site and instructions on how to comment. 'Bloggers' names and comments
were both visible on the blogs.
The blogs were structured as follows:
Welcome message by the Thought Leader of the specific theme area
Background to the project
Summary of four stimulus articles identified through horizon scanning
Links to each of the articles Instructions on how to participate in the blog
Stimulus questions
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
17/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 17of 105
o What today is impossible to do in OH&S but if it could be done would
fundamentally change it for the better?
o Why is it impossible?
o What would make it possible?
o How can you make it possible? Video of Professor Niki Ellis, ISCRR, presenting an overview of the ISCRR Futures
Research Initiative
Video of Dr Robert Burke, Mt Eliza Business School, Monash University,
presenting an overview of futures thinking
Additional resources.
A screen-shot of one blog site (Occupational Health and Safety) is shown in Appendix 2.
The blogs remained open from September to October 2010. Two weeks prior to the
Futures Workshop, all online discussions were analyzed to identify key themes within each
blog. The approach used to analyze each blog comprised a sequence of steps:
Collate all blog postings
Read and clean data for spelling and clarity
Code data for sub-themes:
o What is impossible?
o Why is it impossible?
o What would make it possible?
o Issues/ Barriers
o Visions/Projections/ Trends
o Examples of policy, practice, programs
o Other themes emerging
Organize and present data.
The structure used for each blog summary is shown in Appendix 3. The summaries (see
Appendix 4) were provided in draft form to Thought Leaders and the ISCRR team in
advance of the Futures Workshop to inform their thinking and preparation.
An early analysis was also undertaken by the ISCRR team to identify themes across the
blogs, which may indicate key areas for research, change or development. This was
presented at the Futures Workshop and incorporated in the Powerpoint presentation by
Professor Ellis (see Appendix 4).
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
18/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 18of 105
4.3.3 FUTURES WORKSHOP: OVERVIEW
The workshop was designed to bring together key experts and stakeholders from TAC,
WorkSafe, Monash University and related organisations and fields to identify priority
research questions that would help to shape ISCRR's research agenda. Effort was madeto ensure the workshop was information rich and structured to stimulate interaction, open
discussion and debate among participants. The opening addresses to the workshop were
designed to establish the authority, relevance, significance and expectations of the
workshop.
The program for the Futures Workshop is shown in Appendix 5, and a list of participants at
Appendix 6.
The process elements of the workshop program, and a brief description of them, are as
follows.
4.3.4 FUTURES WORKSHOP: INTRODUCTION
At the opening section of the workshop, guests and participants were welcomed by ISCRR
Chief Executive Professor Niki Ellis, who provided background on the workshop and its
development, aims and structure.
The Hon Tim Holding, Minister for Water, Finance, Tourism and Major Events then
welcomed participants to the workshop on behalf of the State Government. He stressed
the record of achievement by TAC and WorkSafe in Victoria and the opportunity to build on
them, through research, to further improve safety, recovery and compensation
performance in the state. He invited participants to bring an open mindedness to the
workshop deliberations.
The Chair of the ISCRR board, Mr James MacKenzie, welcomed participants in a pre-
taped video presentation. (See Appendix 7 for the welcome letter from Mr MacKenzie to
the participants). He noted that TAC and WorkSafe had emerged as world leaders in the
way they help people recover who are injured at work or on the roads, and in their
approach to compensation. Both organisations have high public visibility through their
advertising campaigns on safety on the roads and at work. He stressed the importance of
ISCRR planning well for the future and understanding challenges such as those emerging
from the ageing of the population and workforce. He saw the input from stakeholdersrepresented at the workshop as very important in helping ISCRR understand the issues
and how these will shape safety, compensation and recovery systems.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
19/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 19of 105
4.3.5 FUTURES WORKSHOP: EXPLANATION OF FUTURES THINKING
Professor Inayatullah provided an overview of the field of futures studies combined with
some key trends and ideas that are shaping our common futures. He outlined how futures
studies had enabled private and public organisations and sectors gain a long rangestrategic perspective on their social role and operations.
Professor Inayatullah then scoped the workshop process for participants: the use of
futures wheels to explore the key issues shaping safety, recovery and compensation
systems identified from the horizon scanning and online discussions; the formulation of
scenarios, using these ideas, to depict alternative futures; linking narratives underpinning
these different scenarios to organisational or sector strategy; backcasting from a selected
scenario to the present day; and identifying the research which needs to be undertaken in
order to realise the longer term scenario. Excerpts from Professor Inayatullahs
presentation are shown in Appendix 8 and Appendix 9.
4.3.6 FUTURES WORKSHOP: VIDEO
Timing the future is a pillar in Inayatullahs methodology. By looking back participants can
gain a sense of the pace and scope of change which can assist to push participants into
the future. To assist with this ISCRR commissioned a video, Past, present and future of
WorkSafe Victoria and TAC. Subsequently the interviews undertaken for the video
became a source of information for a written history of WorkSafe Victoria, also undertaken
by ISCRR.
4.3.7 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FISHBOWL
The 'fishbowl' was a facilitated panel comprising the 11 blog Thought Leaders or their
representatives of each online discussion theme. The lead workshop facilitator
interviewed each Thought Leader/ representative in turn, noting and remarking on key
ideas and themes.
Issues discussed included the changing makeup of the workforce and implications of this
for operating transport and health care systems and the way work is organized, located
and managed. Another issue discussed was equity and the role of workplaces as well as
transport and compensation systems to progress health and social equity objectives for
social and economic reasons.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
20/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 20of 105
4.3.8 FUTURES WORKSHOP: REPORT ON ONLINE BLOG DISCUSSIONS
Feedback prepared by ISCRR on the online discussions was included in the workshop to
provide an overview to participants of the blog postings. A synopsis of the online
discussions was presented by Professor Ellis (see Appendix 4). She noted statistics onparticipation in the blogs and identified nine key cross-blog themes that emerged from the
early analysis of the blogs:
1. Universal care and support for disability
2. Greater focus on non-financial needs, especially emotional, to reduce
unintended harm of compensation schemes
3. Increased engagement with workers through the employment relationship
and with clients through consumer empowerment in care systems
4. Broader ways of measuring success in improving health of society, needs an
evidence base5. New ways of assessing and managing risks dealing with emerging risks
6. New relationships (partnerships and collaborations): governments, NGOs,
business, unions, workers, communities, including globally
7. Technological change paced by social change: reclaiming humanity
8. Diversity as the norm equity as the challenge
9. System integration.
4.3.9 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FUTURES WHEEL EXERCISE, SCENARIO
DEVELOPMENT AND BACKCASTING
Pre-designated groups were seated at tables to undertake a sequence of futuresexercises. They were asked to select a topic from a list (two groups could not do the same
topic). The topics were derived from the nine blog themes and represented important
strategic challenges for the compensation system.
Instructions on using the three futures methods to be used by the groups - futures wheel
exercise, scenario development, and backcasting - were set out in a guide prepared by
futurist and workshop facilitator Professor Sohail Inayatullah (Scenario and Research
Implications) and supplied for use in the workshop.
Futures Wheel
In the first futures studies exercise, groups created a futures wheel. A futures wheelis an
exercise in mind-mapping the impacts of an issue. An issue is placed at the centre of the
wheel and produces a radial pattern of primary/secondary/tertiary impacts. It provides a
structured way of exploring futures related to a topic or theme, and of organizing thinking
and questioning.
An issue, trend or event was selected by each group, which then responded to the
question - what are the impacts of this issue/trend/event? The group then responded to the
question - what are the secondary impacts of these impacts? Further questions identified
the tertiary and more far reaching impacts of impacts. (See Appendix 10 for more detail
and diagrams on this process).
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
21/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 21of 105
Scenario development
The groups then embarked on a scenario development exercise, drawing on the ideas
generated in the futures wheel exercise.
Scenarios are internally consistent portrayals of future states, integrate trends across arange of fields and have multiple purposes including understanding the views of different
stakeholders and perspectives; finding new areas of growth, products, processes, people,
possibilities; and helping clarify often hidden assumptions about the future (see Appendix
8). Scenario development exercises take a range of forms and can be adapted for
particular uses and settings. Sophisticated scenario development initiatives have become
well established in the private sector as part of advanced, longer term strategy
development and are apparently increasingly being adopted for use in the public sector as
the need increases to understand interactions between trends 4.
Three different scenario methods were described in the Futures Workshop workbook:double variable method, multivariable scenario technique and organisation scenario
technique (see Appendix 9). Groups were invited to choose whichever technique
appealed to them and made sense for their topic, and then to apply it to develop four
different future scenarios.
Groups were then asked to deepen their insights into one of the scenarios by discussing
and responding to the following four questions:
What is the core strategy in this scenario?
What are the narratives, stories, metaphors, that can help realise this
scenario?
What are the narratives, stories and metaphors that can prevent the
realisation of this scenario?
In what ways can you re-script the narrative so the scenario has a greater
possibility of being realised or avoided?
Backcasting
Backcasting (sometimes portrayed as the opposite of forecasting) involves selecting a
scenario (a desired future state) then working back in time to identify the necessarystages, events or innovations leading from the present day to the desired future. In a
sense, it tells the story of the factors that brought about one particular, preferred, future
state. It reveals areas where research and development would be needed in order for
particular innovations or decisions to come to fruition.
The workshop facilitators undertook a backcasting exercise in plenary to show how it wasdone. The results of this were printed out from the electronic whiteboard and given to eachgroup for reference.
4Fawkes,S(2009).Howandwhyfuturesstudiesareusedinhealthpolicymaking.UnpublishedPhDthesis.
LaTrobeUniversity.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
22/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 22of 105
Groups were then invited to apply this method to their choice of one of the scenarios.
Questions they were asked to use to develop their backcasting process were:
What events and trends transpired to make the scenario a reality? List at
least three.
What are some strategic pathways?
The groups were encouraged to develop a timeline representing their backcasting work
and reflect on its implications for research.
4.3.10 FUTURES WORKSHOP: PRIORITY RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Groups were then asked to scope the research questions that were evident from or
suggested through the scenario work and backcasting, and write these up on large sheets
of paper. These sheets were then placed at the front of the room and all participants were
asked to move to the front and nominate, by placing sticky dots, the five questions that in
their view were priority questions to address through research. Questions with the most
dots next to them were understood to be those that participants, as a whole group,
regarded as being most important to capture in the ISCRR research agenda.
At the conclusion of the workshop, ISCRR staff took photographs of the sheets of paper on
which the small groups documented their work during the day, for the purposes of
analysing the workshop and its outcomes.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
23/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 23of 105
4.4 METHODS: ISCRR ANALYSIS AND REPORTS
ISCRR analyses, presentations and reports enabled transitions between the variousstages of the Futures Research Initiative, culminating in this Report which synthesizes the
outputs of the Initiative. ISCRRs activities included:
Review and cataloguing of Horizon Scan data into 11 topic areas by an
expert panel
Preparation and publication of the Annotated Bibliography of selected
Horizon Scan articles
The analysis of blog postings and development of nine emerging themes
which was presented to the Futures Workshop
The synthesis of outputs from both the Stakeholder Dialogue Project and
the Horizon Scanning Project which is presented in this Report
A summary of feedback received on the Futures Research Initiative,
presented later in this Report
Preparation of technical and other reports on the Futures Research Initiative
listed at the end of this Report
This Report builds on the outputs of the Horizon Scanning Project and the Stakeholder
Dialogue Project. It highlights the dominant themes in writings on global/national futuresand in the safety, compensation and recovery futures canvassed by stakeholders, then
draws attention to important connections between them.
5. RESULTS OF HORIZON SCANNING PROJECT
5.1 DATA MINING
As noted above, the ISCRR panel shortlisted 183 articles across 11 areas of interest:
1. The future of disability and rehabilitation service delivery models
2. The future of health
3. The future of work
4. The future of individual responsibility versus the welfare state
5. The future of occupational health and safety
6. The future of technology
7. The future of sustainability
8. The future of corporate social responsibility
9. The future of avoiding unintended harm in compensation systems
10. The future of at risk sub groups
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
24/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 24of 105
11. The future of transport.
The innovative data text mining methodology used in the Horizon Scanning Project has
been written up in a separate report Horizon Scanning Project technical review, ISCRR
Research Brief No: 1010-011-R1B.
5.2 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
The annotated bibliography was written so that the reader could understand not only the
focus of the article but also the character (eg research report) or tone (eg speculative) of
the article. It was posted on the 11 blog sites, and provided to participants in the Futures
Workshop.
6.0 RESULTS OF STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROJECT
6.1 ONLINE DISCUSSIONS (BLOGS)
Participation in the blogs is tabulated in Appendix 11. A target of blogs of 100 postings
was set at the start of the project, and a total of 105 postings resulted from the contribution
of 73 individuals (excluding Thought Leaders). Three blogs had twelve postings -
Occupational Health and Safety, Disability and Rehabilitation, and Health and Health Care.
Two blogs had eleven postings - Avoiding Unintended Harm in Compensation Systems
and Work. The blogs with the lowest number of postings were 'at risk' sub-groups (7
postings) and Individual responsibility vs. the Welfare State (6). Participants' postings
provided a range of insights reflecting their professional expertise and experience as well
as personal values. They proposed trends that operate to push circumstances and
systems forward; visions that work to pull circumstances and systems towards futures;
and the past that that serves to create a weight that makes circumstances and systems
resistant to change.
Trendsidentified by bloggers were diverse in scope, indicating the complex context of
safety, compensation and recovery. Demographic trends noted included increasing
population size, ageing of the population and diversification of the working and work
capable - population. Bloggers noted broad social trends such as towards the adoption of
active transport which enables exercise, mobility and social connectedness; participation
by and increasing power of groups previously excluded from the workforce including
women, people with disabilities and migrants. Numerous trends that will shape workfutures were either assumed or identified. As the Victorian workforce contracts and
stagnates because of reducing availability of labour (in turn related to the ageing of the
population), workplaces will need to respond to the requirements and characteristics of the
population groups who will comprise the workforce. These will include people who have
been underrepresented in the past such as women and from more diverse backgrounds.
The prevention of systemic discrimination (discrimination that is serious and impacts on a
whole group of people in a similar way) and promotion of equal opportunity will become
prominent as a consequence of this shift in workforce makeup. Motivation of this workforce
will be key as the scarcity of labour increases. A slowing down of new workforce entrants
will have an impact on areas including the economy, industry, the typical career path andperhaps the standards of education that many will aspire to achieve before entering the
workforce and during their career.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
25/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 25of 105
Technology trends are also reshaping work, including where and what work can be
conducted, introducing new challenges for occupational health and safety, performance
management and work/life balance for individuals and families. Broad technological trends
identified by bloggers included the development of innovations that serve the interests of
energy efficiency and sustainability objectives such as alternative vehicle and fueltechnologies; advances that enable more efficient ways of doing things, such as
computerization of technical processes, but which are at the same time serving the
interests of a culture of instant gratification. Trends in specific sectors are also reshaping
work, injury patterns, potential for prevention and demands on the compensation system.
Where trends in health care such as the availability of prevention technologies meet
increasing consumer demand for personalized care, demand will increase for injury and
disease prevention based on biological, social and psychological factors.
The visions and aspirations portrayed by bloggers gave voice to attributes they want to
see develop in the safety, compensation and recovery fields as well as society and
sectors. Some of the simplest visions had enormous implications for leadership and
harnessing social and technological innovation. For example, every journey is a safe one;
'a society that marshals the capability, effort and funding (its adequacy and duration) more
efficiently, effectively and sustainably around prevention of the problem', in order to reduce
the number of citizens we add to the long term cohort (of people who are disabled or
unemployed for instance) each year'; and 'As a 21st century society, we aspire to a
situation where no-one should expect that their loved ones will be injured, maimed,
diseased or worse as a consequence of their work. And, should they be, that they will have
an assured entitlement to expert treatment and rehabilitation - and fair and just
compensation.'
Some visions were coherent representations of the ways in which workplaces should
function for example: [w]orkplaces will promote participation by all (at-risk ) groups in the
community including mothers, people with a disability, older workers, CALD workers by
having equal opportunity for people to demonstrate their capacity and ability; and providing
a work environment in which people feel confident to speak up where there are issues or
problems and make a complaint without being frightened of victimization or
consequences. Some visions of health were expansive but in line with recent research
and advocacy efforts: 'All new health investments are directed to wellness approaches
based on an understanding of what the major determinants of health or wellness are (such
as employment, good housing, clean air and water).' Others focused on the role ofindividuals in preventing injury and disease, such as 'patients take full responsibility for
their health care needs to prevent illness & disease to prevent hospital admissions, and to
follow recommended rehabilitation/recovery guidelines to prevent re-admissions'.
The counterpoint to visions was barriersto realizing them. Some barriers are enduring
and obstinate factors that inhibit change in systems and the community. A fundamental
issue is that the status quo across a variety of areas serves the interests of some parties
and not others and change can be limited by vested interests and the scale of existing
investments in how particular systems work. Commenting on the transport sector, for
example, bloggers expressed visions related to how transport needs are addressed (eg a
top down multimodal strategic approach) and what future transport systems would look like(eg integrated). The barriers to these visions lie in the entrenched mode silos, that is,
where a car is a solution to a local problem of getting to work or shopping; and an airline is
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
26/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 26of 105
a solution to the local, national or international problem of travelling intrastate, interstate or
internationally.
Barriers to change in the occupational health and safety field related to issues including:
perceptions of what OHS is, its relative importance in an organisation and associatedissues such as the level of investment in OHS and where control of OHS sits; the balance
between strong OHS programs and being competitive in an international context; the pace
of change and the limits to proactive actions; lack of agreement about whose role it is to
lead macro level change; and gaps in evidence needed for policy and practice and
difficulty getting investments in research. Barriers to realizing preferred health and health
care futures included the orientation of the values and investments of the health care
system, lack of population health planning involving key non-health sectors, obstacles to
creating incentives for 'healthy choices to be the easy choices' and resistance by or
inability for people to assume more responsibility for health-related decisions. Health and
health care futures are shaped by supply side (health system) factors and demand side
(individuals and populations) factors. On the supply side, the funding models currently
used for the health system are based on illness management. Investment returns in the
health system come from ill health not good health.
6.2 FUTURES WORKSHOP: FUTURES WHEELS AND SCENARIOS
Futures Workshop groups selected from a range of propositions about the future which
were based on the nine themes emerging from the blog discussions, as follows:
Group 1: Diversity is embraced by the scheme (people are more valuable)
Group 2: New ways of assessing and managing risks, especially emergingrisks eg nanotechnology and genomics
Group 3: Greater focus on emotional and mental needs
Group 4: 30% of scheme budget is prevention
Group 5: Broader ways of measuring scheme success in improving the health
of society
Group 6: Universal care and support for disability
Group 7: Employment based on trust
Group 8. New partnerships and relationships in the system.
Each group developed futures wheels and, using the ideas generated, formulated
scenarios. Depictions of futures wheels and scenarios from all groups were gleaned from
notes taken at the workshop by each group. The futures wheels and scenarios are
presented in the following sections. The results of backcasting are also included. (Only two
groups completed backcasting).
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
27/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 27of 105
6.2.1 GROUP 1: DIVERSITY IS EMBRACED, PEOPLE ARE MORE
VALUABLE
Futures Wheel
The futures wheel created by Group 1, shown in tabular form in Figure 5, scoped several
implications for compensation systems from embracing diversity, then the implications of
these factors. Practical implications were that employer attitudes to their workforce
composition had to change and because of increasing cultural diversity, services for
workers would need to be tailored through providing interpreters for example. At a macro
level, the implications of embracing diversity were significant and included increased costs
initially but reduced societal costs over time. The need to tap into communities to increase
engagement by community members had wider social implications such as the potential to
form partnerships and to create networks and communities where none existed before or
strengthening these networks and communities.Implications if diversity is embraced by the scheme and people are more valuable
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Diverse workforce skills Changing employer attitudes
Design of infrastructureCalculation of costs - long term
focus
Early prevention measures
Tailored services Access to interpreters
Initial cost factors Reduced societal costs
Success measures Societal impact measures
Tapping into communities toincrease engagement
Creating networks/ communities
Partnerships
Flexible work arrangements
FIGURE 5. GROUP 1: FUTURES WHEEL
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
28/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 28of 105
Scenarios
Group 1 applied the Multiple Variable scenario to then explore futures associated with the
challenge of the safety, compensation and recovery scheme (or system) embracing
diversity. Participants identified four key drivers as differentiating one future scenario fromanother:
demography cost (financial and economic) technology social.
The four scenarios generated by Group 1 are presented in Figure 6.
2035
DIVERSITY
Driver: Demography
Headline Workplaces embrace diversity
Systemic causes/ characteristics -
Workforce shortage
Medical technology
Legislation change
High net migration
Worldview
No different
Metaphor
No different
Driver: Financial and economic
Headline Centrelink goes broke
Systemic causes/ characteristics -
Mental health issues
Increase in refugees
Productivity decrease
Structural shift in social support systems
More self reliant
Worldview
Self reliance
Metaphor
Self reliance
Driver: TechnologyHeadline First b ionic person in AustraliaSystemic causes/ characteristics -Reduction in health costsImproved research costs and investmentNanotechnology implantsStem cellRemote workingTelemedicineWorldview My battery never expires
Metaphor Techno worker
Driver: SocialHeadline Victoria tops happiness scaleSystemic causes/ characteristics -Lower working hours legislatedBalanced lifestyleWork hubs
Worldview Im connected to my community
Metaphor Happy community
FIGURE 6. GROUP 1: FUTURES OF THE SAFETY, COMPENSATION ANDRECOVERY SYSTEM -
EMBRACING DIVERSITY
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
29/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 29of 105
6.2.2 GROUP 2: NEW WAYS OF ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISKS
Overview
Group 2 noted two major issues as having a significant influence on how emerging risks
such as those associated with nanotechnology and genomics will be assessed and
managed in future. Firstly, technology will play a significant role in better assessing risk.
Secondly, the extent to which individuals will assume more personal responsibility for
safety will play a role in how risks are assessed and managed. To be able to assume more
responsibility however, individuals will require accurate perceptions of risk which is
contingent on quality information being conveyed to them in ways they can understand and
use. Group 2 used the analogy of driving safety to characterize what they meant by new
ways that risk could be assessed and managed. While the speedometer on a vehicle
instrument panel indicates what speed a driver is doing and therefore communicates a
measure of risk, information about other factors impacting on safety such as blood alcohol
level, fatigue, lighting, road conditions and the mood of driver, are important if an individualis to assess their actual level of risk.
New ways of assessing and managing risks contributing to safety will require sharing
information about individuals risk profiles with government and relevant agencies,
although this has significant implications for privacy. As in many areas of public health,
such an assessment would need to balance absolute personal freedom (to injure oneself,
but then also others) against curtailed personal freedoms in the public interest.
With the blurring of boundaries between home and work and the separation of the
information systems of several agencies working on safety and reducing risks, Group 2
believed there is an argument for developing a combined system addressing universalhealth and safety not just workplace or vehicle safety.
Group 2 felt that there was a need for more research on how to stop things going wrong.
For example, experiments to assess why an incident nearly happened, what was going on
at the time, what piece or pieces of information was/ were not available/ understood/
applied that led to a near miss.
Futures Wheel
The futures wheel created by Group 2 is shown in tabular form in Figure 7. A key
implication of the issue of new ways of assessing and managing risks was that theseactivities have ethical dimensions covering various aspects of data management (data
security, what data is collected and how it is used and lack of data as a basis for decision
making) and these need to be addressed in measuring the outcomes of the system.
Another implication was that new risks are inherent in innovations and a preventive
approach (perhaps along the lines of the prevention principle in public health) should be
applied as innovations are developed and adopted.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
30/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 30of 105
Implications of new ways of assessing and managing risks especially emergingrisks
Primary impact Secondary impact Tertiary impact
Assess environmentalimpact
- criteria for approval
International implications World market
Utilizing technology toassess
Pick up risks earlier
Ethical implications Data security
What we collect and how we use data
Lack of data
Measurement ofoutcomes
Corporate responsibility
Technology Self health assessment
Benefits for societyGovernment research body for newproducts
Need to assess from this perspective
Impact of technology and products egIPad, Coca Cola
New risks
Prevention
Broader support - allaccidents
Fragmentation of safetyknowledge
Rethink structures of today - VicPol,TAC, MFB, CFA
Broader definition of risk egwellness
Focus on prevention
Skills
Resources
Holistic view
Social implications
New issues Ageing population
Technology - IPods, hearing
Mental health impact Resilience
FIGURE 7. GROUP 2: FUTURES WHEEL
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
31/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 31of 105
Scenarios
Group 2 applied the Double Variable technique to explore futures associated with new
ways to assess and manage risks (especially those that are emerging). Participants
identified two key variables as shaping the four futures scenarios: prevention/compensation and universal coverage/Work and road injury coverage. Group 2 noted that
to broaden the scope of compensation, there needed to be a shift to prevention and to
increased individual responsibility. A number of tensions around the issue of assessing
and managing risks (especially emerging risks) were identified by Group 2:
extent of coverage need for / role of compensation system individual responsibility versus state responsibility safety versus broad notion of holistic health prevention versus compensation.
The four scenarios generated by Group 2 are presented in Figure 8.
Universal focus (health and safety)
Prevention
Headline - UtopiaSystemic causes/ characteristics -We know what health is (populationlevel)Individuals are responsible and capableand knowledgeableTechnology enabledUnhealthy behaviour incentives forhealthy behaviourOne agency - nationalSupport based on need if desiredMetaphor - Universal (health andsafety)
Headline - Busting the BankSystemic causes/ characteristics -No individual accountabilityAll healthcare needs are metHigh taxationIncome security
Metaphor - Universal (health and safety)
Compensation
Headline - Half way houseSystemic causes/ characteristics -EducationTargeted but effective preventiontherefore decreased incidence of roadand traffic accidentsBusinesses thrivesLawyers go bankrupt
Fault-based systemMetaphor - Prevention
Headline - Lawyers dreamSystemic causes/ characteristics -Government led - no individualaccountabilityCause of injury-based, not needs basedPeople with injuries who dont haveaccess because not work or road injuryInjury-based therefore health problems
neglectedPrevention under-developedMetaphor - Living in the past
Work and road injury focus
FIGURE 8. GROUP 2: FUTURES OF ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISKS
Group 2 deepened their exploration of the scenario Utopia by responding to the questions
posed in the workbook. The key points made were as follows.
Group 2s core strategy was about broadening coverage to all health and safety matters
(not just those associated with roads and work). The realisation of the strategy would
involve:
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
32/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 32of 105
Defining universal health and safety in terms of proper measures, standards
and KPIs
A shift in the system focus to prevention
Emphasizing physical, social and behavioral factors.
Increasing individual accountability and support using knowledge and
technology from government, business, etc (individual empowerment)
Developing universal access to knowledge we model
Developing an integrated system (national)
Utilizing social innovation as a driver of technological development for
prevention
Encouraging innovation to solve the problems we dont yet have.
Barriers to the realisation of the strategy were identified as the removal of individual
freedom/ choice; and the predilection of humans to take risks.
Group 2 believed they learned that to broaden coverage requires a shift to prevention with
greater emphasis on physical, social and behavioral factors.
6.2.3 GROUP 3: GREATER FOCUS ON EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL NEEDS
Overview
Group 3 had a vision of a greater focus on emotional and mental wellbeing. The metaphor
of a jazz band playing harmoniously together was used as a way of emphasizing that
while individuals are responsible for their own actions, we as a community have to play in
harmony with each other. Embodied in the metaphor are values, for example, some
instruments are equally important and all are valued; some musicians may have solos, but
these are all part of the song; and working well together creates a beautiful whole
harmony and listening to rest of band is vital.
The group felt that in the past, communities relied on institutions such as churches to
reinforce community values, of the importance of sharing responsibility. As churches have
lost their influence, a new approach is needed to take up this role and other institutions
have sought to promote shared values. This is a role that is bigger than TAC, Worksafe
and ISCRR's current agenda.
The significant trend which has a major influence on how they could realize the vision, was
the effective use of social marketing/mass communication campaigns which had
demonstrated positive outcomes Life be in it, the Gun Buy Back initiative, the TAC road
safety campaigns and the Worksafe campaigns. Social marketing was thought to help
convey ideas and encourage shared values in the community in the way that the churches
or other major social institutions once did. The group discussed a QUIT type campaign
aimed at achieving these goals. Media advertising to achieve such changes in behaviourand attitudes to life and responsibility for others was thought to be a long term, expensive
project just as TAC and Worksafe programs were in their initial years. There appears to
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
33/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 33of 105
have been a reduction in the budget for these programs and that this could explain the
increase in accidents this year.
The backcasting process showed that the greatest challenge is the political will to invest in
this approach - $30 million a year would be required which is huge by Victorian mediacampaign standards but not large when cost savings are considered. The group thought
that the election of the new state government, and its stated policy on advertising, meant
that this investment will be impossible to achieve without some other way of giving
TAC/Worksafe/ ISCRR other income.
Lack of political will/timing was noted as a significant barrier to addressing this issue. The
Port Arthur atrocity provided a context for the Liberal government to stand up to traditional
conservative government support base (farmers/gun lobby) to introduce both the Gun
Buyback scheme and tighter legislation governing gun ownership.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
34/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 34of 105
Futures Wheel
The futures wheel created by Group 3 is shown in tabular form in Figure 9. The
implications of bringing a greater focus to emotional and mental needs at the third tier level
were identified as: whether ISCRR is the right body to develop greater communityawareness of these issues or whether another agency is better placed; promoting social
inclusiveness, the interconnectedness of people and communities, is at the heart of
bringing a greater focus to emotional and mental needs; and a stronger recognition of
these areas of health and wellbeing has implications for workplaces in terms of expanding
existing programs and services to cover these areas as well a physical health.
Implications of bringing a greater focus to emotional and mental needs
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Greater community
awareness of i ssues
What is the role of WorkSafe/ TAC
in this?
Is there another agency?
Individual and communityresponsibility, social thinking tocome to the fore
Social inclus iveness,interconnectedness ofpeople and communities
Huge shift to preventionChanges to how we can engage/support people through systemsWhat is the responsibility ofemployers to understand wellbeingneeds/ emotional needs of workers
Prevention message spreadthroughout community inother areasNew including non-medical
workfo rce to tackle issueswith family/ community focus
Research project to understand
workforce
Preventive issues focus onunemployment
Stop unemployment after 18months and people feelingworthless
Greater acceptance andsupport
More open to what people need -young people/ emotional needsIncrease in number identifying ashaving mental health issues
Implications forworkplace to treatmental health issues
More effectivecommunication
What is media/ communicationmode for next generations
Greater investment in mentalhealth
Implications for funding models,government
FIGURE 9. GROUP 3: FUTURES WHEEL
Scenarios
Group 3 applied the Organisation Scenario technique to develop futures related to with
bringing about a greater focus on emotional and mental needs in the area of safety,
compensation and recovery. Participants identified factors that differentiated four different
scenarios as worst, best, business as usual and outliers. The four scenarios generated
by Group 3 are presented in Figure 10.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
35/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 35of 105
2035
Worst caseHeadline - Youre on your own > No-onecares
Systemic causes/ characteristics -Reactive Demand >Supply from systemNot viableUnfunded schemeInformation/ knowledge poorCompensation dependentImpacting everythingNo health or social responseIneffective/ repeat customers
Best caseHeadline - Positive attitude to lifeSystemic causes/ characteristics -
Early intervention/ PreventionPeople valueFully integrated systemTrustInformation richIndividual awareness of benefits to a safer lifeCommunity responsibilityNo stigma
Business as UsualHeadline - WorkSafe and TAC will look aftermeSystemic causes/ characteristics -
Medical focusFollow the trendsTodays trendsTreatment vs. Prevention
OutliersHeadline - Im OK, Everyone is OKSystemic causes/ characteristics -Instant cure
Happiness IndexDetection screeningGet treatment you needAbundant amount of suppliers
FIGURE 10. GROUP 3: FUTURES OF EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL NEEDSIN SAFETY, COMPENSATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS
The best case scenario Positive attitude to life was examined by Group 3 in more
detail. Group 3 also did a backcasting exercise to define what actions or innovations would
be needed in order for the compensation system to embrace emotional and mental needs.
The results are presented in Figure 11.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
36/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 36of 105
2035
Positiveattitude tolife
Earlyintervention
Prevention
All valued
Understand issues
Awareness
Communication to improvepositiveattitudes to life
Startbenchmarking (Vicpopn.)
Evidenceto supporttargetedcampaign
Groupresearch tomeasureattitudes
Wellnesscentres
2
011
2
012
2
013
2
015
2
020
2
025
2
030
2
035
FIGURE 11. GROUP 3: BACKCASTING - EMBRACING EMOTIONAL AND MENTALNEEDS IN COMPENSATION BY 2035
Through this exercise, the group determined that realizing the vision would require a ten
year effort to: establish a foundation of understanding issues and measuring attitudes,
benchmark to establish baseline information about emotional mental needs, create
infrastructure such as wellness services/ centres; and to generate evidence to support a
targeted campaign.
6.2.4 GROUP 4: 30% OF SCHEME BUDGET IS PREVENTION
Overview
Group 4 focused on scenarios associated with extra money being spent on the prevention
of accidents that cause personal injuries (additional 30%). The group discussed how
additional funds might be spent and the possible roles of the regulator in relation to this
objective. The group observed that some of the most successful TAC and WorkSafe
innovations had come from "leaps of faith" lead by a strong regulator in an environment of
"crisis". The observation was also made that in all likelihood, a "portfolio" approach would
be preferred with some investment across a variety of approaches to prevention.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
37/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 37of 105
Futures Wheel
The futures wheel created by Group 4 is shown in tabular form in Figure 12. A number of
implications of the central proposition were traced. Industry and its expertise would have to
broaden if one third of the schemes budget is dedicated to prevention and mental healthand stress would need to be included as a stream of focus for schemes. The role of
regulators would shift to one of enabling prevention. Workers, in assuming more market
power, would be in a position to demand information from employers or prospective
employers about their compensation history.
Implications if 30% of scheme budget is prevention
Primary Secondary Tertiary
New ways for prevention Broaden industry and expertise
Mental health/ stress?
Society prevents
More collaboration betweenemployees and employers
Role of indiv iduals?
Role of government?
Role of the regulator To enable?
Incentive - employer focus
New way of measuringsuccess?? Not jus t $$
Workers have market power What's your compensation history?
What's your safety history?
Political backlash at where $are spent
How to prove results?
Employers laying off staff
Increased premium initiallythen reduced
Society's attitude changes School contributes education Whole of safety focus
Most dominant message
Less injured and dead
More advice to employee
Increase enforcement - everyworkplace
FIGURE 12. GROUP 4: FUTURES WHEEL
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
38/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 38of 105
Scenarios
Group 4 applied the Double Variable technique to explore futures associated with bringing
the percentage of schemes budgets for prevention to 30%. Participants identified two key
variables as shaping the four futures scenarios: community-society collaboration vs.independent authority-strong regulation control, and public vs. science.
The four scenarios generated by Group 4 are presented in Figure 13.
2035
Community/ Society
Collaboration
Public
Headline - Speculative
Systemic causes/ characteristics -
Car companies and workplaces sponsor
community for safe workMany ideas from many community and
industry
Small seeds lead to big change/ deep in
community
- strong ownership/ social
movement
- differential outcomes
- success and failures
- political risk and controversy
- farmers markets
Headline - Collective IQ
Systemic causes/ characteristics -
Grants/ community and industry
Self insurance modelGovernment and industry collaboration/
technology
Incentives/ fines to innovate
Slow and bureaucratic
Science
Headline - Leaps of faithSystemic causes/ characteristics -
Public
- ego/ guts
Confident regulator
Strategic risk taking and venture capital
model
Big scale changes
Social judgment
Big brother / GPS 100% monitored
vehicle
Big Brother hoons drive bicycle
Headline - Tried and trueSystemic causes/ characteristics -
Technology innovation
Evidence, science, statistics
Super safety
Risk averse decisions
Data based
Small gains/ little resistance
Lack of innovation
No dramas/ traditional
Independent authority/ regulation
Control
FIGURE 13. GROUP 4: FUTURES OF THE COMPENSATION SCHEME BUDGET FORPREVENTION
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
39/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 39of 105
6.2.5 GROUP 5: BROADER WAYS OF MEASURING SUCCESS IN
IMPROVING HEALTH OF SOCIETY
Overview
The group scoped the business as usual situation, where activities are driven by what is
currently measured, then imagined a broader system that uses a variety of techniques
(qualitative & quantitative) to measure clients' recovery, the contribution of the
compensation scheme to a healthy society and broader aspects of scheme performance.
The group generated the analogy between managing the compensation system and flying
an aeroplane to explore what would need to be measured and by whom. In this analogy,
'business as usual' would be the single pilot operating the plane using a narrow range of
instruments on the control panel. The new system would have co- or multiple pilots (eg
representing the compensation system, consumers, other key stakeholders) and multiple
instruments on the control panel (reflecting a desire to manage the system in response to
a broader range of inputs). The broader range of instruments would provide informationthat shows the dynamic relationship between population health, system performance and
client/ community satisfaction. This would remove dependency on one type of data and
result in a more community-driven system measuring scheme success in improving the
health of society. While the group had limited time to discuss specific measures of a
healthy society, the point was made that such measures have the properties listed in the
best case scenario.
Futures wheel
The futures wheel created by Group 5 is shown in tabular form in Figure 14. A number of
implications of broadening the measures of the schemes success were noted.Establishing the scope and duration of measures was identified as an important basis, with
approaches like life course and holistic health offering conceptual frameworks for
designing a measurement system. Integrating worker and transport compensation
schemes was identified as an implication of wanting to measure the longer term impact of
schemes on wellbeing. An overall implication is that scope of a schemes mandate would
need to be reassessed.
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
40/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 40of 105
Implications o f broadening ways to measure scheme success in improv ing thehealth of society
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Measurement over extendedduration
Measure sustainability of impact ofscheme
Integrate schemes(work, transport etc)
Measure health beyond thescheme return to work, lifespanapproach
Measurement across broaderrange of factorsWe do what we measureMandate of schemeschallenged
Narrower?
Define what a healthy societyis
What is the story
- physical indicators- mental indicators- happiness- satisfaction- disability management ofintegration- attitudes to vulnerable groups(inclusiveness)
Virtual schemeLess segregation betweenschemes
FIGURE 14. GROUP 5: FUTURES WHEEL
7/23/2019 017 ISCRR Futures Initiative Long Report
41/105
Research Report No. 0811-017-R1 Page 41of 105
Scenarios
Group 5 applied the Organisation Scenario technique to develop futures related to
measurement of the success in safety, compensation and recovery schemes in improving
the health of society. The four scenarios generated by Group 5 are presented in Figure 15.2035
Business as Usual
Headline - Data driven
Systemic causes/ characteristics -
Narrower focus
Focus on those who are injured
Reactive
Inward focused
Lagged indicators
Keep doing the same thingInnovation within current boundaries
Change only occurs from reaction
World view doesnt change
Outlier
Headline - Self driven
Systemic ca