Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mohammedfathelbab |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 94
8/13/2019 02Yen
1/94
Seismic Lessons Learned
W. Phillip Yen, Ph.D., P.E.Seismic Research Program Manager
Office of Infrastructure R&D, [email protected]
8/13/2019 02Yen
2/94
Outline San Fernando, CA 1971
Loma Prieta CA 1989
Northridge, CA, 1994 Kobe Ja an 1995
Kocaeli & Duzce, Turkey, 1999
Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999 Nisqually (Olympia), WA, 2001
Niigata, Japan, 2007
Pisco, Peru, 2007
Concluding Remarks
8/13/2019 02Yen
3/94
SAN FERNANDO, CA 1971
8/13/2019 02Yen
4/94
SAN FERNANDO
8/13/2019 02Yen
5/94
SAN FERNANDO
8/13/2019 02Yen
6/94
LESSONS LEARNED
1971 SAN FERNANDO, CA
Increase Seat Width
Provide Continuity at Bearings and Joints
Design Columns for Shear and Moment
Develop Column to Footing/Cap Anchorage
8/13/2019 02Yen
7/94
LOMA PRIETA, 1989
8/13/2019 02Yen
8/94
LOMA PRIETA
8/13/2019 02Yen
9/94
LOMA PRIETA
8/13/2019 02Yen
10/94
LOMA PRIETA
THE GEOTECHNICAL E.Q.
Distribution of damageindicated close correlation betweenlocal soil condition and severity of
resultant damage.
8/13/2019 02Yen
11/94
LESSONS LEARNED
1989 LOMA PRIETA
Simple retrofit helps
Evaluate Soil/Foundation Stability
Account for Forces/Displacements
Evaluate Existing Inventory
8/13/2019 02Yen
12/94
NORTHRIDGE,1994
8/13/2019 02Yen
13/94
NORTHRIDGE
8/13/2019 02Yen
14/94
NORTHRIDGE
8/13/2019 02Yen
15/94
NORTHRIDGE
8/13/2019 02Yen
16/94
NORTHRIDGE
8/13/2019 02Yen
17/94
NORTHRIDGE
8/13/2019 02Yen
18/94
LESSONS LEARNED
EARTH UAKE DISASTERS
Com lex Geometr Redistributes Forces
1994 NORTHRIDGE
- Skew- Varied Column Hei hts
Accommodate Shear & Flexure
Post 89 Desi ns Reduced Dama e
Retrofit Improves Resistance
- Joint Restrainers
- Column Jacketing
Pre aredness Facilitates Recover
8/13/2019 02Yen
19/94
KOBE, Japan 1995
8/13/2019 02Yen
20/94
KOBE
8/13/2019 02Yen
21/94
KOBE
8/13/2019 02Yen
22/94
LESSONS LEARNED
1995 HANSHIN AWAJI (KOBE)
Fuses
- Isolation
-
- Displacement Control
8/13/2019 02Yen
23/94
LESSONS LEARNED
EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS
Accommodate Forces & Displacements
Consider Near Field Effects
Identif Li uefaction Potential Retrofit Improves Performance
Current Designs Improve Resistance
repare ness ac tates ecovery
Nothing is Earthquake Proof
8/13/2019 02Yen
24/94
The 1999 Turkish Earthquakes:
Post Earthquake Investigation ofStructures on TEM
Hamid Ghasemi, PH.D.
Philip Yen, PH.D., P.E.ames . ooper, . .
Federal Highway dministration
8/13/2019 02Yen
25/94
Nov. 12, 1999
Duzce EQMw = 7.2
T = 30 sec.
> 1000 Casualties(0.25g
. ,Kocaeli EQ
Mw = 7.4
T = 45 sec.
17000 Casualties
Duzc
e
MARMARA
SEA (0.41g)(0.23g)
)
(0.32g) (0.5
g).
g)
NAF
TURKE
Epicenters and PGAsEpicenters and PGAs
8/13/2019 02Yen
26/94
rifiye Overpassrifiye Overpass45 km east of the e icenter Constructed in 1988AASHTO (1975) coefficient method
4 Spans (26 m) 12.5 m wide
5-Simply supported precast,
pre-stressed concrete u-beams Continuous deck cast in site
Elastomeric laminated bearings
Wa type piers & pi e oun ations Shear keys only at abutmentsRightRight--Lateral Offset = 1.5 mLateral Offset = 1.5 m
Surface Fault TraceSurface Fault Trace
8/13/2019 02Yen
27/94
Surface Fault TraceSurface Fault Trace
8/13/2019 02Yen
28/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
29/94
Shear-key Failure
8/13/2019 02Yen
30/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
31/94
T ical Under asses Observed Damage
Settlement
8/13/2019 02Yen
32/94
General View of the Viaduct #1General View of the Viaduct #1
-- Total Length = 2.3 kmTotal Length = 2.3 km-- Number of Spans = 59Number of Spans = 59
-- Each Span = 40 mEach Span = 40 m
-- ==
ContinuousContinuous
over 10 spansover 10 spans
..
-- Max. Pier Height = 49 mMax. Pier Height = 49 m
-- Superstructure = 7 PS Box GirderSuperstructure = 7 PS Box Girder-- Soil Type = Type IISoil Type = Type II
-- = . g= . g
-- It was 95% completedIt was 95% completed
at the time of earthquakeat the time of earthquake
-- Pile ca is 3Pi le ca is 3--m thick, restin on 12m thick, restin on 12D=1.8 m CIDH piles up to 37 m in alluvD=1.8 m CIDH piles up to 37 m in alluv
8/13/2019 02Yen
33/94
Surface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1urface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1
KOERIKOERI
8/13/2019 02Yen
34/94
Surface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1urface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1
~~ ~~
Pier 45 Pier 46 Pier 47
#45#45~~~~
* Resurveyto determine relative pier movement.
Check for pile/foundation damage
8/13/2019 02Yen
35/94
Excessive Movement in Longitudinal Directionxcessive Movement in Longitudinal Direction
8/13/2019 02Yen
36/94
EDU FailureEDU Failure
8/13/2019 02Yen
37/94
Expansion JointExpansion Joint
8/13/2019 02Yen
38/94
Lessons Learned fromTurkey EQ.EQ Fault crossings difficult to identify
If possible avoid construction near known faults
Provide sufficient displacement capacity for short span
bridges constructed near known faults
Larger seat width -- very sound investment
Proper construction and detailing of critical elements
Proper selection, design, and detailing of EDU
Design & construction Q-C imperative
Awareness / information dissemination
8/13/2019 02Yen
39/94
Taiwan Chi-Chi EQ. 1999: First EQ.
8/13/2019 02Yen
40/94
Chi-Chi
Earthquake,, ,
2007
Magnitude =
7.3
8/13/2019 02Yen
41/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
42/94
Reverse Fault
1. DIP-SLIP FAULTS b) Reverse Faultthrust fault reverse slip fault or compressional fault
8/13/2019 02Yen
43/94
a) Normal Fault normal-slip fault, tensional fault or gravity faultthrust fault, reverse-slip fault or compressional fault
]
Fault Motion2. STRIKE-SLIP FAULTtranscurrent fault, lateral fault, tear fault or wrench faul]
3. OBLIQUE-SLIP FAULT
8/13/2019 02Yen
44/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
45/94
Design Codes for Taiwanese
8/13/2019 02Yen
46/94
Design Codes for Taiwanese
w yVaries Bridges Based on Ja anese
1960
Design Spec. Bridge Design Codes
Standard Based on 1953
1960pec cat on or
Highway Bridges
of Taiwan
AASHTO Standard
Specification
Based on 19771987
2nd
edition
Bridge Design
Codes
AASHTO
Specification
1995Current Bridge
Design Codes
ase on
AASHTO
Specifications
Neu Tso Pu Creek Bridge:
8/13/2019 02Yen
47/94
Neu-Tso-Pu Creek Bridge:
e emen n ransverse rec ons
Substructure Damage -
8/13/2019 02Yen
48/94
Substructure Damage -
u
8/13/2019 02Yen
49/94
Bearin Failure
8/13/2019 02Yen
50/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
51/94
- , - ,
Taiwan, September 1999
8/13/2019 02Yen
52/94
I-Jian Brid e
,
24 spans @ 11m au t upture up te . to m un er t e
North Abutment
12 spans collapsed
Overhan Su erstructures???
I Jiang Bridge
8/13/2019 02Yen
53/94
I-Jiang Bridge
8/13/2019 02Yen
54/94
B i F B id
8/13/2019 02Yen
55/94
Bei-Fun Brid e
,
Spans Collapsed au t upture ear y an utment
New Water Fall
Bei Fung Bridge Fault Rupture 5 6M
8/13/2019 02Yen
56/94
Bei-Fung Bridge -Fault Rupture 5-6M
8/13/2019 02Yen
57/94
Mao Luo Shi Brid e
8/13/2019 02Yen
58/94
Mao-Luo-Shi Brid e
C-bents Type Connection (Eccentrically) or zonta urve
Pier Top Concrete Spalling and ShearCracks
Su erstructure Settled
Mao Lo Shi Brid e
8/13/2019 02Yen
59/94
Mao-Lo-Shi Brid e
Mau Lo Shi Brid e
8/13/2019 02Yen
60/94
Mau-Lo-Shi Brid e
Mau Lo Shi Brid e
8/13/2019 02Yen
61/94
Mau-Lo-Shi Brid e
Vertical/Horizontal
8/13/2019 02Yen
62/94
Ton Tou Brid e
8/13/2019 02Yen
63/94
Ton -Tou Brid e
Spans Collapse au t upture
Abutments moved Liquefaction under abutment foundations
and a roaches
Piers Fractured
8/13/2019 02Yen
64/94
Failure of shear-critical columns in Tong-tou bridge, Chi-chi Earthquake,
Taiwan, September 1999
8/13/2019 02Yen
65/94
Shear failure in pier of Wu-shi bridge, Chi-chi Earthquake,
Taiwan, September 1999
Lessons Learned
8/13/2019 02Yen
66/94
Lessons Learned Fault rupture
-
Ground failures precipitate structurala ure
Abutment back-walls and back -fills are
essential for continuous bridges
Shear failures must be avoided in piers
Shear keys are required to prevent
Issues
8/13/2019 02Yen
67/94
Issues
Near Fault Effects ear ng es gn
Restoration Retrofitting
How to construct (or reconstruct) a bridge
Other Infrastructure
8/13/2019 02Yen
68/94
Buildings ar or
Liquefaction Huge Land Slides
Shi-Gan Dam- Fault Ru ture
8/13/2019 02Yen
69/94
Shi Gan Dam Fault Ru ture
8/13/2019 02Yen
70/94
Kun -Fu Elementar School
8/13/2019 02Yen
71/94
Kun Fu Elementar School
Kun -Fu Elementar School
8/13/2019 02Yen
72/94
Kun Fu Elementar School
Hu e Landslide
8/13/2019 02Yen
73/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
74/94
Hu e Landslide
8/13/2019 02Yen
75/94
Challen e
8/13/2019 02Yen
76/94
ow wou you construct a r ge across
a known fault?
Nisqually (Olympia)
8/13/2019 02Yen
77/94
u . .
Wednesday, February 28, 2001 p center: m es nort east o ymp a
Hypocenter: 30 miles
Magnitude: 6.8
8/13/2019 02Yen
78/94
Fourth Avenue Bridge, Olympia
Shear Cracks in Column
8/13/2019 02Yen
79/94
agno a r ge, ea e
Damaged Concrete T-Brace
8/13/2019 02Yen
80/94
Holgate Bridge - Column Failure
Fourth Avenue Ramp to I-90, Seattle
8/13/2019 02Yen
81/94
Damaged Bearing
8/13/2019 02Yen
82/94
Capitol Blvd. U-Xing - damaged
end diaphragm and laterals
8/13/2019 02Yen
83/94
Alaskan Way Viaduct
Temporary Shoring at
Damaged Knee Joint
Niigata Earthquake, Japan
8/13/2019 02Yen
84/94
Date: July 16th, 2007.
e ypocen er ep
is approximately 17 km.The ma nitude of this
earthquake was 6.8,
11 people were killed
injured.
2000 houses were
comp e e y co apse or
partially collapsed.
8/13/2019 02Yen
85/94
8/13/2019 02Yen
86/94
Pisco Peru Earth uake 2007
8/13/2019 02Yen
87/94
Embankment and roadway failure at Pan American Highway km 190. The picture was taken
facing north. Note the Pacific Ocean in the top left of the photo. The damage was caused
by liquefaction of the wet coastal si lty soils that led to lateral spreading and subsequent
.
G d i f t t t d t h fl t d ff th i id
8/13/2019 02Yen
88/94
Ground waves moving from west to east appeared to have reflected off the more rigidmaterial on the right.
Paved shoulder on the east side of the Pan American Highway was shoved up
against the ridge in the background when liquefied coastal soils sloshed laterally.
8/13/2019 02Yen
89/94
Pavement damage from liquefaction
Pan American Highway km 220 near San Clemente, Peru
8/13/2019 02Yen
90/94
Severe cracking of Pier 2 (from South end) necessitates
extensive repair but the horizontal shear blocks managed to
retrain lateral movement of the superstructure
8/13/2019 02Yen
91/94
retrain lateral movement of the superstructure.
u p e azar ssue: uac nga r ge on e a m . s s ee
truss bridge has suffered severe damage to the bottom chord from debris
impact. There is a large granite boulder jammed between the two
8/13/2019 02Yen
92/94
from this earthquake.
Multiple hazard Issue: Huachinga Bridge on Rte 110 at km 39. This steel truss bridge has
suffered severe damage to the bottom chord from debris impact. There is a large granite
boulder jammed between the two channels of the bottom chord that has fallen from the
.
8/13/2019 02Yen
93/94
SUMMARY
LESSONS LEARNED
8/13/2019 02Yen
94/94
LESSONS LEARNED
EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS
Newer Designs Improve Performance
Retrofit Helpsbut..
U.S. Seismicity Not Well Understood