+ All Categories

02Yen

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: mohammedfathelbab
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 94

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    1/94

    Seismic Lessons Learned

    W. Phillip Yen, Ph.D., P.E.Seismic Research Program Manager

    Office of Infrastructure R&D, [email protected]

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    2/94

    Outline San Fernando, CA 1971

    Loma Prieta CA 1989

    Northridge, CA, 1994 Kobe Ja an 1995

    Kocaeli & Duzce, Turkey, 1999

    Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999 Nisqually (Olympia), WA, 2001

    Niigata, Japan, 2007

    Pisco, Peru, 2007

    Concluding Remarks

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    3/94

    SAN FERNANDO, CA 1971

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    4/94

    SAN FERNANDO

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    5/94

    SAN FERNANDO

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    6/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    1971 SAN FERNANDO, CA

    Increase Seat Width

    Provide Continuity at Bearings and Joints

    Design Columns for Shear and Moment

    Develop Column to Footing/Cap Anchorage

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    7/94

    LOMA PRIETA, 1989

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    8/94

    LOMA PRIETA

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    9/94

    LOMA PRIETA

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    10/94

    LOMA PRIETA

    THE GEOTECHNICAL E.Q.

    Distribution of damageindicated close correlation betweenlocal soil condition and severity of

    resultant damage.

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    11/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    1989 LOMA PRIETA

    Simple retrofit helps

    Evaluate Soil/Foundation Stability

    Account for Forces/Displacements

    Evaluate Existing Inventory

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    12/94

    NORTHRIDGE,1994

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    13/94

    NORTHRIDGE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    14/94

    NORTHRIDGE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    15/94

    NORTHRIDGE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    16/94

    NORTHRIDGE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    17/94

    NORTHRIDGE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    18/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    EARTH UAKE DISASTERS

    Com lex Geometr Redistributes Forces

    1994 NORTHRIDGE

    - Skew- Varied Column Hei hts

    Accommodate Shear & Flexure

    Post 89 Desi ns Reduced Dama e

    Retrofit Improves Resistance

    - Joint Restrainers

    - Column Jacketing

    Pre aredness Facilitates Recover

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    19/94

    KOBE, Japan 1995

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    20/94

    KOBE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    21/94

    KOBE

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    22/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    1995 HANSHIN AWAJI (KOBE)

    Fuses

    - Isolation

    -

    - Displacement Control

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    23/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS

    Accommodate Forces & Displacements

    Consider Near Field Effects

    Identif Li uefaction Potential Retrofit Improves Performance

    Current Designs Improve Resistance

    repare ness ac tates ecovery

    Nothing is Earthquake Proof

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    24/94

    The 1999 Turkish Earthquakes:

    Post Earthquake Investigation ofStructures on TEM

    Hamid Ghasemi, PH.D.

    Philip Yen, PH.D., P.E.ames . ooper, . .

    Federal Highway dministration

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    25/94

    Nov. 12, 1999

    Duzce EQMw = 7.2

    T = 30 sec.

    > 1000 Casualties(0.25g

    . ,Kocaeli EQ

    Mw = 7.4

    T = 45 sec.

    17000 Casualties

    Duzc

    e

    MARMARA

    SEA (0.41g)(0.23g)

    )

    (0.32g) (0.5

    g).

    g)

    NAF

    TURKE

    Epicenters and PGAsEpicenters and PGAs

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    26/94

    rifiye Overpassrifiye Overpass45 km east of the e icenter Constructed in 1988AASHTO (1975) coefficient method

    4 Spans (26 m) 12.5 m wide

    5-Simply supported precast,

    pre-stressed concrete u-beams Continuous deck cast in site

    Elastomeric laminated bearings

    Wa type piers & pi e oun ations Shear keys only at abutmentsRightRight--Lateral Offset = 1.5 mLateral Offset = 1.5 m

    Surface Fault TraceSurface Fault Trace

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    27/94

    Surface Fault TraceSurface Fault Trace

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    28/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    29/94

    Shear-key Failure

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    30/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    31/94

    T ical Under asses Observed Damage

    Settlement

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    32/94

    General View of the Viaduct #1General View of the Viaduct #1

    -- Total Length = 2.3 kmTotal Length = 2.3 km-- Number of Spans = 59Number of Spans = 59

    -- Each Span = 40 mEach Span = 40 m

    -- ==

    ContinuousContinuous

    over 10 spansover 10 spans

    ..

    -- Max. Pier Height = 49 mMax. Pier Height = 49 m

    -- Superstructure = 7 PS Box GirderSuperstructure = 7 PS Box Girder-- Soil Type = Type IISoil Type = Type II

    -- = . g= . g

    -- It was 95% completedIt was 95% completed

    at the time of earthquakeat the time of earthquake

    -- Pile ca is 3Pi le ca is 3--m thick, restin on 12m thick, restin on 12D=1.8 m CIDH piles up to 37 m in alluvD=1.8 m CIDH piles up to 37 m in alluv

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    33/94

    Surface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1urface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1

    KOERIKOERI

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    34/94

    Surface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1urface Fault Rupture at Viaduct 1

    ~~ ~~

    Pier 45 Pier 46 Pier 47

    #45#45~~~~

    * Resurveyto determine relative pier movement.

    Check for pile/foundation damage

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    35/94

    Excessive Movement in Longitudinal Directionxcessive Movement in Longitudinal Direction

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    36/94

    EDU FailureEDU Failure

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    37/94

    Expansion JointExpansion Joint

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    38/94

    Lessons Learned fromTurkey EQ.EQ Fault crossings difficult to identify

    If possible avoid construction near known faults

    Provide sufficient displacement capacity for short span

    bridges constructed near known faults

    Larger seat width -- very sound investment

    Proper construction and detailing of critical elements

    Proper selection, design, and detailing of EDU

    Design & construction Q-C imperative

    Awareness / information dissemination

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    39/94

    Taiwan Chi-Chi EQ. 1999: First EQ.

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    40/94

    Chi-Chi

    Earthquake,, ,

    2007

    Magnitude =

    7.3

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    41/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    42/94

    Reverse Fault

    1. DIP-SLIP FAULTS b) Reverse Faultthrust fault reverse slip fault or compressional fault

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    43/94

    a) Normal Fault normal-slip fault, tensional fault or gravity faultthrust fault, reverse-slip fault or compressional fault

    ]

    Fault Motion2. STRIKE-SLIP FAULTtranscurrent fault, lateral fault, tear fault or wrench faul]

    3. OBLIQUE-SLIP FAULT

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    44/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    45/94

    Design Codes for Taiwanese

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    46/94

    Design Codes for Taiwanese

    w yVaries Bridges Based on Ja anese

    1960

    Design Spec. Bridge Design Codes

    Standard Based on 1953

    1960pec cat on or

    Highway Bridges

    of Taiwan

    AASHTO Standard

    Specification

    Based on 19771987

    2nd

    edition

    Bridge Design

    Codes

    AASHTO

    Specification

    1995Current Bridge

    Design Codes

    ase on

    AASHTO

    Specifications

    Neu Tso Pu Creek Bridge:

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    47/94

    Neu-Tso-Pu Creek Bridge:

    e emen n ransverse rec ons

    Substructure Damage -

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    48/94

    Substructure Damage -

    u

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    49/94

    Bearin Failure

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    50/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    51/94

    - , - ,

    Taiwan, September 1999

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    52/94

    I-Jian Brid e

    ,

    24 spans @ 11m au t upture up te . to m un er t e

    North Abutment

    12 spans collapsed

    Overhan Su erstructures???

    I Jiang Bridge

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    53/94

    I-Jiang Bridge

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    54/94

    B i F B id

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    55/94

    Bei-Fun Brid e

    ,

    Spans Collapsed au t upture ear y an utment

    New Water Fall

    Bei Fung Bridge Fault Rupture 5 6M

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    56/94

    Bei-Fung Bridge -Fault Rupture 5-6M

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    57/94

    Mao Luo Shi Brid e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    58/94

    Mao-Luo-Shi Brid e

    C-bents Type Connection (Eccentrically) or zonta urve

    Pier Top Concrete Spalling and ShearCracks

    Su erstructure Settled

    Mao Lo Shi Brid e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    59/94

    Mao-Lo-Shi Brid e

    Mau Lo Shi Brid e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    60/94

    Mau-Lo-Shi Brid e

    Mau Lo Shi Brid e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    61/94

    Mau-Lo-Shi Brid e

    Vertical/Horizontal

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    62/94

    Ton Tou Brid e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    63/94

    Ton -Tou Brid e

    Spans Collapse au t upture

    Abutments moved Liquefaction under abutment foundations

    and a roaches

    Piers Fractured

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    64/94

    Failure of shear-critical columns in Tong-tou bridge, Chi-chi Earthquake,

    Taiwan, September 1999

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    65/94

    Shear failure in pier of Wu-shi bridge, Chi-chi Earthquake,

    Taiwan, September 1999

    Lessons Learned

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    66/94

    Lessons Learned Fault rupture

    -

    Ground failures precipitate structurala ure

    Abutment back-walls and back -fills are

    essential for continuous bridges

    Shear failures must be avoided in piers

    Shear keys are required to prevent

    Issues

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    67/94

    Issues

    Near Fault Effects ear ng es gn

    Restoration Retrofitting

    How to construct (or reconstruct) a bridge

    Other Infrastructure

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    68/94

    Buildings ar or

    Liquefaction Huge Land Slides

    Shi-Gan Dam- Fault Ru ture

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    69/94

    Shi Gan Dam Fault Ru ture

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    70/94

    Kun -Fu Elementar School

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    71/94

    Kun Fu Elementar School

    Kun -Fu Elementar School

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    72/94

    Kun Fu Elementar School

    Hu e Landslide

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    73/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    74/94

    Hu e Landslide

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    75/94

    Challen e

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    76/94

    ow wou you construct a r ge across

    a known fault?

    Nisqually (Olympia)

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    77/94

    u . .

    Wednesday, February 28, 2001 p center: m es nort east o ymp a

    Hypocenter: 30 miles

    Magnitude: 6.8

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    78/94

    Fourth Avenue Bridge, Olympia

    Shear Cracks in Column

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    79/94

    agno a r ge, ea e

    Damaged Concrete T-Brace

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    80/94

    Holgate Bridge - Column Failure

    Fourth Avenue Ramp to I-90, Seattle

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    81/94

    Damaged Bearing

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    82/94

    Capitol Blvd. U-Xing - damaged

    end diaphragm and laterals

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    83/94

    Alaskan Way Viaduct

    Temporary Shoring at

    Damaged Knee Joint

    Niigata Earthquake, Japan

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    84/94

    Date: July 16th, 2007.

    e ypocen er ep

    is approximately 17 km.The ma nitude of this

    earthquake was 6.8,

    11 people were killed

    injured.

    2000 houses were

    comp e e y co apse or

    partially collapsed.

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    85/94

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    86/94

    Pisco Peru Earth uake 2007

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    87/94

    Embankment and roadway failure at Pan American Highway km 190. The picture was taken

    facing north. Note the Pacific Ocean in the top left of the photo. The damage was caused

    by liquefaction of the wet coastal si lty soils that led to lateral spreading and subsequent

    .

    G d i f t t t d t h fl t d ff th i id

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    88/94

    Ground waves moving from west to east appeared to have reflected off the more rigidmaterial on the right.

    Paved shoulder on the east side of the Pan American Highway was shoved up

    against the ridge in the background when liquefied coastal soils sloshed laterally.

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    89/94

    Pavement damage from liquefaction

    Pan American Highway km 220 near San Clemente, Peru

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    90/94

    Severe cracking of Pier 2 (from South end) necessitates

    extensive repair but the horizontal shear blocks managed to

    retrain lateral movement of the superstructure

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    91/94

    retrain lateral movement of the superstructure.

    u p e azar ssue: uac nga r ge on e a m . s s ee

    truss bridge has suffered severe damage to the bottom chord from debris

    impact. There is a large granite boulder jammed between the two

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    92/94

    from this earthquake.

    Multiple hazard Issue: Huachinga Bridge on Rte 110 at km 39. This steel truss bridge has

    suffered severe damage to the bottom chord from debris impact. There is a large granite

    boulder jammed between the two channels of the bottom chord that has fallen from the

    .

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    93/94

    SUMMARY

    LESSONS LEARNED

  • 8/13/2019 02Yen

    94/94

    LESSONS LEARNED

    EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS

    Newer Designs Improve Performance

    Retrofit Helpsbut..

    U.S. Seismicity Not Well Understood