+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 03 Village Planning Report

03 Village Planning Report

Date post: 10-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: asha-titus
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 46

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    1/46

    Village PlanningEmpowering people through

    self-help

    Nchum Ovung

    Katherine RandallPragya TanejaAsha Susan Titus

    In collaboration with

    Social Consultancy ServicesLucknow, Uttar Pradesh

    For every childHealth, Education, Equality, ProtectionADVANCE HUMANITY

    KCCI / 2007-03

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    2/46

    Disclaimer

    The views expressed in this case study are those of the authors alone and do not necessarilyreflect the policies or the views of UNICEF and / or the Social Consultancy Services.

    Design & Printing : Rajdhani Art Press | 98102 45301

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    3/46

    Table of Contents

    11111

    Acknowledgements 2Foreword 3

    Acronyms 4

    Executive Summary 5

    Statement of Problem 6

    Methodology 8

    Background 10

    Intervention 12

    Objectives 12

    Strategies 12

    Activities 13

    Actors 15

    Outputs 16

    Findings 17

    Sunaura 17

    Sironkhurd 19

    Jamalpur 21

    Dashrara 22

    Impact 23

    Analysis and recommendations 25

    Service delivery 25

    Social inclusion 28

    Sustainability 31

    Conclusion 35

    References 36

    Annexure 37

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    4/46

    Acknowledgements

    The research team wishes to thank Mr. Syed Mohammed Baqar of the SocialConsultancy Services for his wisdom, his supervisory support and his good humour in

    times of adversity; Mr. Shafqat Hussain, Mr. Sanjay Sharma and Mr. Amit Bajpai of

    the Sarathi Development Foundation District Team for their hospitality, their guidance

    around the villages and government offices of Lalitpur and for bearing with our

    incessant demands; Mr. Akhilesh Tiwari, Chief Executive of the Sarathi Development

    Foundation, Lucknow for his thorough and energetic introduction to village planning

    and for feeding and housing us in his sparkling new offices; Mr. Rajib Ghosal, Mr.

    Prosun Sen and others at UNICEF, Uttar Pradesh for setting our research and film

    adventures on the right track; and finally the community members of Sunaura,

    Sironkhurd, Jamalpur, Dashrara and Bhadauna for their warmth, openness, enthusiasm

    and generosity, and for opening our eyes.

    22222

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    5/46

    Foreword

    The Knowledge Community on Children in India is a partnership between UNICEF and

    the Government of India which aims to fill knowledge gaps and promote information-

    sharing on policies and programmes related to children in India. In 2007, under the aegis

    of this initiative, 57 graduate students from India and across the world visited and

    documented projects focused on child rights and development. Their fresh perspectives,

    commitment and hard work are reflected in this series of case studies, which are published

    by UNICEF.

    The case studies cover key sectors linked to children and development and address important

    policy issues for children in India. These include: primary education, reproductive and

    child health, water and sanitation, child development and nutrition, social exclusion and

    village planning. Based on desk research and field work, these case studies tell the story of

    innovations in service delivery, what works, why and under what conditions and put a

    human face to the successes and challenges of development in India.

    UNICEF recognises the potential and power of young people as drivers of change and

    future leadership across the globe. As such, the KCCI Summer Internship Programme

    also aims to develop a cadre of young research and development professionals withinterest, commitment and skills relating to child rights. UNICEF hopes to continue this

    collaboration with young researchers, the Government of India, and various research

    partners, so as to bring fresh perspectives and energy to development research and our

    ongoing efforts towards the fulfilment of rights of women and children in India.

    Representative

    UNICEF India

    33333

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    6/46

    Acronyms

    ABSA Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikari (Education Officer)

    ADO Assistant Development Officer

    ANM Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (block and village level)

    ASHA Accredited Social Health Activist

    AWC Anganwadi Centre

    AWW Anganwadi Worker

    BCC Behaviour Change Communication

    BCG Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

    BDO Block Development OfficerBTF Block Task Force

    BSA Basic Shiksha Adhikari (Education Officer)

    CBO Community Based Organisation

    CBT Community Based Trainer

    CDO Chief Development Officer (Zila Panchayat level)

    CMO Chief Medical Officer (Zila Panchayat level)

    DM District Magistrate

    DTF District Task Force

    FGD Focus Group DiscussionHIV/AIDS Human Immuno-deficiency Virus/Acquired Immuno-deficiency

    Syndrome

    ICDS Integrated Child Development Services

    IFA Iron Folic Acid

    NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

    NREG National Rural Employment Guarantee

    OBC Other Backward Castes

    PRI Panchyati Raj Institution

    PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal

    SC Scheduled Castes

    SHG Self-Help Group

    ST Scheduled Tribes

    UP Uttar Pradesh

    UNICEF United Nations Childrens Fund

    USAID United States Agency for International Development

    VP Village Planning

    44444

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    7/46

    Executive Summary

    The village planning (VP) intervention is a government of Uttar Pradesh and UNICEF

    initiative, implemented by the Sarathi Development Foundation in Lalitpur district of

    Uttar Pradesh. It is a five-day participatory exercise which aims to empower the

    community with the skills to identify the problems it faces and to build bridges to service

    providers in order to solve those problems. With great justification, the VP intervention

    is widely seen as a success.

    Since the successes of village planning are extensively documented, the research team

    set out to explore three questions that remain unanswered. These are:

    1) Firstly, whether the success of village planning in generating demand for services is

    matched by a similar improvement in service delivery?

    2) Secondly, whether the benefits of the village planning intervention extend tosocially

    excluded groups?

    3) Thirdly, whether the benefits of the village planning intervention will besustainable

    once UNICEF and theSarathi Development Foundation withdraw?

    In summary, we found that VP has succeeded in generating an increase in demand for

    services. As yet this has not been met by an equal improvement in service delivery. Any

    future attempts to replicate this model should address service delivery vigorously from

    the outset, seeking to integrate the government at all levels in the VP process.

    The benefits of VP are not yet shared equally between all social groups in the villages.

    Whilst women and girls have been empowered by the village planning process, members

    of Scheduled Tribe (ST) communities have gained significantly less from the intervention.

    There is a need for more focused attention and rigorous follow-up with ST communities.

    There remain challenges to ensuring the sustainability of village planning benefits.

    Integration with the government system at thePanchayat, block and district levels is

    crucial to achieving sustainability. Similarly, intense follow-up with the Village volunteers,

    Community-based organisations and frontline government workers in the immediate

    aftermath of the five-day village planning exercise help to maximise benefits. In sum,

    consolidation must be prioritised over coverage.

    55555

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    8/46

    Statement of Problem

    The village planning intervention in Lalitpur is widely perceived to have been a success.

    There is significant justification for this perception. VP seeks to effect change on 18 key

    indicators, and its success in doing so, is impressive. For example, across the three

    blocks (Birdha, Talbehat and Jakhaura) it has increased the number of mothers initiating

    colostrum and breastfeeding from 39 per cent to 86.2 per cent; it has increased the

    number of families consuming iodized salt from 15.4 per cent to 53.7 per cent; it has

    increased the number of children (in the age group 14-18) with knowledge of HIV/

    AIDS from nil to 41.3 per cent; it has increased the school enrollment of children in the

    age group 6-14 years from 91.2 per cent to 98 per cent; and it has ensured that 36.7 per

    cent (or 140 of 381) of non-functioning hand-pumps were repaired. From a baseline of

    no schools providing hand-washing facilities with soap, it has ensured that 25 schools

    have started providing such facilities. In the Birdha block alone, from a baseline of no

    children having their births registered, it has ensured that 752 children were registered1.

    In terms of qualitative data, the successes of village planning are easily identified through

    Most Significant Change Stories. Here are two examples2:

    Earlier everyone in theHarijan Basti in Menwar (Birdha block) used to consumeraw salt. Every household used to bring back one sack which used to last for almost

    a year. Now more than 60 households have started consuming iodized salt in the

    village. Meera was the first one who decided that her family would use iodized salt

    only and as such she herself went up to Birdha block and bought two packets of salt.

    . . Then she started the task of motivating other women to start consuming iodized

    salt as it is healthier. . . Today Meera says that she doesnt find too much cost difference

    in the salt . . . given that this salt also protects from many health hazards.

    Shanaz never initiated colostrum feeding to her children as she considered her first

    milk to be impure. However, when Taj was born and Afsana [Village volunteer]

    reached her house at the time of delivery, she urged Shahnaz to immediately breastfeed

    Taj. . . When Afsana insisted, citing reasons and quoting examples, Shahnaz gave up

    her resistance.

    66666

    1 Source: Reassessment survey and Integrated village planning, Lalitpur district, a presentation by the

    Sarathi Development Foundation

    2 Sarathi Development Foundation, Annual Progress Report: August 2005 to July 2006 and August 2006

    to October 2006 (Extension Phase), p. 25

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    9/46

    These quantitative and qualitative measures of success are recorded in the Sarathi

    Development Foundations reassessment analysis and its annual and quarterly reports.

    What is not recorded there is the fact that the village planning intervention in Lalitpur

    has gained significant attention from outside organisations. For example, the World

    Bank is interested in replicating the model as part of its UP Health System DevelopmentProgramme. Bank officials have met with UNICEF and Sarathi and visited Lalitpur

    district, and are now involving UNICEF and Sarathi in the second phase of the project.

    USAID has also shown interest in the model. Its partner organisation, Intra International,

    has selected the Lalitpur village planning intervention to be evaluated for effectiveness,

    replicability and sustainability under its evidence review process. Similarly, the National

    Planning Commission is currently exploring whether this model can be replicated; given

    the thrust on decentralised planning in the Government of Indias 11th Five Year Plan.

    By almost any measure quantitative or qualitative, internal or external - the Lalitpur

    village planning intervention can be seen as a success story.

    However, these successes are well-documented, both by the Sarathi Development

    Foundation and UNICEF, and by other outside organisations. The Research Teams task

    in this report is not to provide another account of the successes of village planning.

    Instead, it addresses three key questions about the village planning intervention, which

    appear crucial to its ongoing success, and which remain unanswered.

    1) Firstly, whether the success of village planning in generating demand for services is

    matched by a similar improvement in service delivery?

    2) Secondly, whether the benefits of the village planning intervention extend tosocially

    excluded groups?

    3) Thirdly, whether the benefits of the village planning intervention will besustainable

    beyond the period of UNICEFs funding and the Sarathi Development Foundations

    involvement in the villages?

    This report seeks to explore the answers to these three key questions through a case

    study of four villages (Sunaura, Sironkhurd, Jamalpur and Dashrara) in Lalitpur district.

    The team has developed recommendations, which it is hoped may be taken into account

    both in the future implementation of the project in Lalitpur and in the replication of the

    model by other organisations, further afield.

    77777

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    10/46

    Methodology

    In order to answer the three research questions, the team undertook ten days of field

    work in Lalitpur, visiting the four villages mentioned above, which were selected on the

    basis of the following criteria:

    1) One village, where village planning had not taken place (Dashrara, Bar block);

    2) One village, where village planning was carried out in the first phase of

    implementation, July October 2005, and Response Planning had not taken place

    (Sironkhurd, Jakhaura block);

    3) One village, where village planning was carried out in the first phase and Response

    Planning had taken place (Sunaura, Talbehat block); and4) One village, where village planning was carried out in the second phase, November

    2005 January 2006, and where social exclusion was a concern (Jamalpur, Talbehat

    block).

    The team used quantitative as well as qualitative data to evaluate the three research

    questions. For quantitative data, the source was reports provided by Sarathi and UNICEF,

    in particular the annual and quarterly reports and the re-assessment rnalysis report3. For

    qualitative data, a range of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools, including semi-

    structured individual interviews, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and dream-mapping

    were used. The table below records all qualitative data collection.

    Table 1: Details of qualitative data collection

    PRA Tool Used With whom

    Semi-structured ! Sarathistaff members (Lalitpur)

    individual interview ! Pradhans (Sironkhurd, Jamalpur, Dashrara)

    ! ASHA workers (Sunaura, Sironkhurd)

    ! Lady health visitor (Jamalpur)

    ! Anganwadi workers (Sunaura, Jamalpur, Dashrara)

    ! Anganwadi helpers (Sironkhurd, Jamalpur, Dashrara)

    ! Village volunteers (Sunaura, Sironkhurd, Jamalpur)

    ! Child reporters (Jamalpur, Sunaura)

    ! Other community members, including parents, adolescent

    girls, women, children and representatives of STs

    (Sahariyas), SCs (Ahirwar, Banskar, Rajak), OBCs (Yadav,

    Kushwaha) and general categories (Thakur, Bundela)

    88888

    3

    See References section for full details, p. 36

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    11/46

    ! District Officials (CMO and BSA CDO and DM not

    available) Block Officials (BDO, ABSA, ADO of Talbehat

    block)

    FGDs ! Womens Self-help groups (Sunaura, Sironkhurd)

    ! Pregnant and lactating mothers (Sunaura, Sironkhurd,

    Jamalpur)

    ! Adolescent Girls Groups (Sunaura, Sironkhurd)

    ! Men (Sironkhurd)

    Dream-mapping ! Children (Sahariya hamlet, Jamalpur)

    In addition, the team observed the PRA techniques which Sarathi uses during the five-

    day village planning process to understand the village and to encourage behaviour change:

    in Sironkhurd, the team witnessed the use of participatory social mapping, chapatti

    diagramming and a childrens rally. The second day of a three-day mini-planning exercise

    facilitated by Sarathi in Badhauna village, Jakhaura block was observed, and a Talbehat

    block task force meeting, chaired by the BDO, attended.

    Research constraints

    The team faced certain limitations. For example, though it benefited enormously from

    having three Hindi speakers, in situations where respondents could only speak the local

    dialect, some information and nuance was lost.

    Since the team members were outsiders, it was not uncommon for community members

    and frontline government workers to exaggerate in order to impress the team and ensure

    that the community was perceived in a positive light. This made it challenging for the

    team to uncover the facts in certain situations.

    Given the fixed duration of the ten-day field trip, the team had limited time in each

    village. This restricted opportunities for rapport-building with community members,

    which was particularly problematic with adolescent girls groups, where the girls took

    time to open up and discuss sensitive issues concerning menstrual hygiene, use of

    contraceptives and HIV/AIDS awareness.

    Being a film group, and needing to capture certain discussions and interviews on camera,

    was a constraint on the research. The presence of the camera often intimidated

    respondents, and determined the framing of their answers to questions.

    Finally, the presence of Sarathi staff during some interviews and discussions may have

    influenced the respondents to answer in a way that they believed would be acceptable to

    the staff.

    99999

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    12/46

    Background

    The Lalitpur district of Uttar Pradesh was chosen for the village planning intervention

    in part because UNICEF had an existing presence in the district, but also because of the

    particular challenges that Lalitpur faces. The district is over 300 kilometres from the

    state capital, Lucknow. It is an isolated border district (see map on page 38), often

    described as a teardrop of Uttar Pradesh in Madhya Pradesh. Agriculture forms the

    backbone of Lalitpurs economy, but the district suffers from acute water shortages and

    regular droughts, this in spite of its seven irrigation dams. In terms of transport, the

    district has a poor road network and poor public transport. Government officials perceive

    Lalitpur to be a punishment posting; there is rapid turnover of government officials at

    block and district level and the district suffers from large numbers of vacancies for

    frontline workers.

    On key social development indicators, Uttar Pradesh performs worse than India as a

    whole on almost every measure:

    Table 2: Key Development indicators: Uttar Pradesh and India

    INDICATORS4 India Uttar Pradesh

    PovertyPercentage living below the poverty line 26.1 31.2

    Infant Mortality Rate

    Number of babies per 1,000 born alive who die before aged one 63 80

    Immunization

    Percentage of children fully immunized 44.0 28.7

    Malnutrition

    Percentage of children aged under 3 who are underweight 47 52

    Water

    Percentage of rural households using protected water 73.2 85.5

    SanitationPercentage of rural households using toilets 21.9 19.2

    School attendance

    Percentage of children aged 6-10 attending school 82.3 80.1

    Literacy

    Percentage of population over 7 years who are literate 65 56

    Birth registration

    Percentage of children aged under 5 who are not registered at birth 65.3 93.5

    1010101010

    4

    Data source: UNICEF, Mapping Indias Children: UNICEF in Action, pp.62-63

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    13/46

    Similarly, Lalitpur district performs worse than Uttar Pradesh as a whole on almost

    every indicator (see Table 3). Most notably, Lalitpur has the dubious distinction of being

    the district with the second highest rate of child marriage in the whole of India, behind

    Tonk district in Rajasthan.

    Table 3: Key development indicators: Uttar Pradesh and Lalitput district

    INDICATORS5 Uttar Pradesh Lalitpur

    Infant Mortality Rate

    Number of babies per 1,000 born alive who die before aged one 83 85

    Maternal Mortality Rate

    Number of mothers per 100,000 who die during childbirth 707 800

    Age at marriage

    Average age in years 19 15

    Exclusive Breast-feeding (EBF)

    Percentage of mothers practicing EBF for first 6 months 56

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    14/46

    Intervention

    Objectives

    UNICEF believes that some previous interventions have not had the desired impact

    principally because of a failure to achieve necessary levels of community ownership. As

    a result, the village planning intervention was developed with the aim of bringing the

    various sections of the community together, developing a common understanding of the

    problems facing the village, and planning the necessary action to be taken by the

    community for its own socio-economic development.

    The key objectives of the VP process are twofold: to empower the community with the

    skills to identify problems facing it on an ongoing basis, and to build the capacity in the

    village to bridge the gap between the community and the service providers to solve

    those problems.

    Fundamentally, the VP intervention represents a demand-creation approach to

    development. It rests on the sound assumption that members of the community are best

    able to identify the problems facing them and to make demands of those whose

    responsibility it is to deliver services to the community. This approach follows from a

    recognition that the era of the supply approach has passed. Now is the time to empower

    community members to change their own behaviours and to demand and realise their

    rights to access the services to which they are entitled.

    In addition, village planning seeks to address issues across sectors in a convergent manner.

    In this, it is unique when compared to the vast majority of other interventions, which are

    perceived to deal with issues within one sector (for example UNICEFs Quality Education

    Package, the government of Indias Total Sanitation Campaign, etc.).

    Strategies

    The development of the village planning intervention should not be seen in a vacuum.

    The 73rd Amendment (1993) provided constitutional status toPanchayati Raj institutions.

    This ensured decentralisation of power to local self government institutions and facilitated

    a bottom-up decision-making process in India.

    1212121212

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    15/46

    Furthermore, recent development theory, championed by Robert Chambers at Sussex

    Universitys Institute of Development Studies, advocates for a shift from a top-down to

    a bottom-up approach to development. In his bookRural Development: Putting the Last

    First, Chambers argues that development practice needs to start from the point of view

    of poor peoples experiences. This movement finds resonances in the work of AmartyaSen who, in his book,Development as Freedom said that the people have to be seen, in

    this perspective, as being actively involved given the opportunity in shaping their

    own destiny, and not just as passive recipients of the fruits of cunning development

    programs. The village planning intervention fits squarely within this thinking by aiming

    to empower community members to identify and solve the challenges facing their

    communities.

    Activities

    The village planning process is divided into three phases: the pre-planning phase, the

    planning phase itself and the post-planning phase.

    Pre-planning phase

    In the pre-planning phase, a zero day visit is carried out by a team from Sarathi. During

    this day-long visit, a socio-economic overview of the village is conducted, rapport is

    built with local service providers and thePanchayat(local self government), a friendly

    environment is created in the village and local catalysts are identified. Various tools are

    used during this visit including a transect walk, focus group discussions, childrens rally,

    hamlet and community meetings and individual contact. A tentative schedule for re-

    visit is agreed upon.

    Planning phase

    The Planning phase is an intensive process carried out in a village for a minimum period

    of five days and nights. The Sarathi facilitators use a wide variety of participatory tools

    to engage with and understand the community and its needs. Each of the five days has

    many specific objectives and expected outcomes. At a high level, these have been

    summarised by Mr. Akhilesh Tiwari (Executive Director of Sarathi) as follows:

    1313131313

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    16/46

    Day 1: Familiarisation with the community (including a village transect, village

    rally, school andAnganwadi visits, village meeting, hamlet meetings etc)

    Day 2: Collection of qualitative and quantitative data (involving the village youth

    in conducting a house-to-house survey)

    Day 3: Analysis of data (compiling household survey information and sensitisingthe villagers on the key findings)

    Day 4: Initiating System Development (establishing a womens self-help group and

    an adolescent girls group to carry forward behavioural change work)

    Day 5: Developing a Village Action Plan (community members develop a plan on

    the basis of the village planning process- identifying the problems facing

    them, possible solutions and allocation of responsibility for follow up action)

    At the end of Day 5, the Village Action Plan is painted on a wall in a central location in

    the village and the responsibility for it is formally handed over from Sarathi facilitatorsto the Gram Panchayatin a village meeting. During this meeting, four to five Village

    volunteers are identified by the community to drive forward change in the village.

    Post-planning

    After the five-day village planning intervention, the crucial work of follow up begins.

    This takes some specific forms (set out below) and a number of more ad hoc forms:

    ! Village volunteers undergo a five-day training programme intended to build their

    capacity to perform their new roles in the village;

    ! Sarathi holds Reflection Meetings for groups of volunteers at the cluster level on a

    monthly or bimonthly basis;

    ! A village information centre is established holding a pool of information at the

    community level;

    ! One of Sarathis field coordinators visits the village every 2-3 months to meet with

    the volunteers and community based organisations, to help follow up the Action

    Plan, and to liaise with the frontline government workers in the village;

    ! Approximately one year after the village planning intervention, a re-assessment

    analysis is performed to measure progress against the 14 indicators (See Table 4);

    ! In some villages, an intensive two-day Mini-Planning exercise is carried out some

    time after the village planning intervention to identify new issues that have arisen in

    the village;

    ! At cluster level, Response Planning takes place identifying common needs (p.34).

    1414141414

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    17/46

    Actors

    UNICEF

    The UNICEF Office for Uttar Pradesh has funded the village planning intervention,

    from January 2005 to December 2007, when the intervention will enter phase-out. The

    Lalitpur intervention is part of a broader UNICEF India initiative to implement village

    planning in 17 key districts across the country.

    Government of Uttar Pradesh

    The village planning intervention is a joint initiative of UNICEF and the government of

    UP. The UP government is not funding the initiative, but supports its implementation.

    Sarathi development foundation

    Sarathi is implementing the village planning intervention in Lalitpur. This NGO has a

    team of 17 personnel based in the district, who train the volunteers, facilitate the village

    planning process, provide follow up in the villages and work with all levels of government

    officials.

    Village volunteers (orBal Bandhus friends of children)

    The Village volunteers, selected for their enthusiasm and ability to communicate, form

    the backbone of this intervention in the villages. Gender balance and representation of

    the various communities within the village is ensured amongst the volunteers. Volunteers

    are responsible for driving forward progress in behavioural change and service delivery

    after the five-day VP exercise.

    Womens self help groups and adolescent girls groups

    These two Community based organisations are formed on the 2nd or 3rd day of the village

    planning process. They are created to help further behavioural change work at the family

    level.

    Community based trainers

    Certain Village volunteers are selected to become Community based trainers, undertaking

    a 12 day training course including 5 days in the field. They are then ready to be volunteersin their own villages and to facilitate the VP process in other villages.

    Field coordinators

    Field coordinators are Sarathi employees responsible for facilitating the post-planning

    phase. In each block there are 4-5 field coordinators, who visit each village around once

    every two to three months. At village level, they are responsible for meetings with village

    volunteers and CBOs, following up the action plan and liaising with frontline government

    workers in each village. At cluster level, they facilitate reflection meetings for village

    volunteers.

    1515151515

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    18/46

    Outputs

    From the re-assessment survey conducted in 151 revenue villages, the following are the

    overall outputs against 14 key indicators in all three blocks of Lalitpur district, where

    village planning has so far taken place.6

    Table 4: Findings from the reassessment survey7

    # Indicators Baseline End line

    1. Colostrum and Breastfeeding 39.0% 86.2%

    2. Full Immunization 39.9% 49.4%

    3. Education (6-14 years) 91.2% 98.0%

    4. Use of ORS 24.0% 40.7%

    5. Knowledge of HIV/AIDS (14-18 years) N.A. 41.3%6. Child Marriages 56.0% 55.4%

    7. Institutional deliveries 19.1% 28.8%

    8. Use of Iodized Salt 15.4% 53.7%

    9. Hand washing behaviour (ash/soap) N.A. 66.4%

    10. Hand washing behaviour (only soap) N.A. 33.3%

    11. Access to sanitation facilities 9.9% 15.1%

    12. Use of toilets 39.2% 62.4%

    13. Access to safe drinking water source NA 50.9%

    14. Birth Registration 0 66.4%

    6 Source: Integrated village planning, Lalitpur district, a presentation by the Sarathi Development

    Foundation. The above table is based on the results from the Reassessment Exercise conducted in 151

    villages covering 12 Nyay Panchayats across three blocks. The data was presented to Government officials

    during the Cluster Response Plan meeting.

    7 For the Sample, refer to Annexure B. The sample was chosen in order to understand the status of the

    most disadvantaged sections of society so may underestimate the outputs of VP for all sections of

    society.

    1616161616

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    19/46

    Findings

    The tangible outputs of the VP intervention observed in each of the four sample villages

    are stated below.

    Sunaura

    Sunaura appears to be a model village in terms of the progress of the VP intervention. It

    has an active Information Centre at the heart of the village, which was used regularly by

    the Community based organisations for their meetings. The Information Centre houses

    a detailed village file (containing a compilation of household surveys, names of

    volunteers, names and backgrounds of school children and all other VP information), an

    elaborate social map, a copy of the Action Plan and, crucially, a change map. The change

    map was used to monitor progress against ten indicators for every household in the

    village. It visually illustrated that the households making the most progress were those

    of the girls in the Adolescent Girls Group, but it also clearly showed the lack of progress

    in the Sahariya hamlet.

    There was an active and knowledgeable Adolescent Girls Group. The group had divided

    village households amongst themselves for the purpose of sharing critical behaviourchange information. The most significant obstacle to the girls education was the fact

    that the junior school was several kilometres away, and parents were hesitant to send

    girls to school alone. But in the group, there were girls who cycled their way to school

    and were quite determined to finish their education. Two girls in the group who had

    dropped out of school after the 8th grade were encouraged to start alternate education in

    sewing and embroidery for which they now travel to another village.

    Most significant change

    Anoop, a child reporter for theBalvani magazine generated as part of this project,

    narrated how prompt action was taken after his drawing was published showing the

    local school teacher asleep at his desk. The volunteers and community members

    marched to the block level offices to agitate and a new teacher was soon appointed.

    The Womens self-help group held bi-monthly meetings to which the ASHA and the

    Anganwadi workers were invited. The members vocally expressed how VP has infused

    in them the courage to work with and speak with men, even though initially, they had

    been silent spectators at VP meetings. They were keen to become a thrift and trade

    1717171717

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    20/46

    group and a couple of them had received training in Chennai on sanitary napkin

    production.

    Most members of the CBOs felt that the important changes brought about by VP include

    hand washing with soap; before VP, ash or mud was used (see Table 5 a leap from 0

    per cent at the time of the baseline household survey to 32 per cent in the re-assessment

    of September 2006); the increased demand for iodized salt leading to greater availability

    in the village (8.7% to 57.1%); and the spread of awareness of HIV/AIDS (nil to 90%).

    Improvements in service delivery include the increase in birth registration (the efforts of

    the village volunteers have led to the two-year backlog being cleared, taking birth

    registration from nil to 100%) and the repairing of hand pumps enabling more families

    to access safe drinking water.

    Table 5: Sunaura-change indicators

    # Indicators Sunaura8

    Baseline % Endline %

    1 Total households 150 100 70 46.7

    2 Children in age group 0-6 months 46 - 5 -

    3 Colostrum and breastfeeding 27 58.7 4 80

    4 Children in the age group 0-1 year NA - 14 -

    5 Birth registration 0 0 14 100

    6 Children in the age group 0-3 years 55 - 24 -7 Full immunization 43 78.2 15 62.5

    8 Children in the age group 6-14 years 131 - 70 -

    9 Enrolled in school 117 89.3 69 98.6

    10 Children in the age group 14-18 years NA - 30 -

    11 Knowledge of HIV/AIDS NA - 27 90

    12 Total marriages in the last 2 years 21 - 0 -

    13 Child marriage 11 52.4 0 0

    14 Families having access to

    safe drinking water source NA - 70 100

    15 Deliveries occurring last year 46 - 9 -

    16 Institutional deliveries 6 13 6 66.7

    17 Use of iodized salt 13 8.7 40 57.1

    18 Toilets 1 0.7 1 1.4

    19 Use of toilets 1 100 1 100

    20 Hand-washing (only soap) NA - 23 32.9

    1818181818

    8

    Source, Sarathi Development Foundation, A Brief Report on re-assessment analysis

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    21/46

    While the success stories are enthralling, a visit to the villagesSahariya hamlet shows

    a stark contrast. Knowledge of critical information among pregnant women (like

    frequency of check-ups and vaccinations during pregnancy, necessity of exclusive

    breast feeding) was negligible and most did not use the services of theAnganwadi

    Centre. Of the sevenSahariya households, most could not remember the VP exercisewhich took place eight months earlier and none could identify the issues on the action

    plan. For several months each year, the Sahariya families migrate to construction

    sites outside the village for wage labour, which exacerbated their isolation from the

    rest of the village. Despite being entitled to them, they did not have ration cards and

    were just beginning to receive Employment Guarantee cards that ensured access to

    the governments NREG Scheme.9

    Table 6: Sironkhurd-change indicators

    # Indicators Sironkhurd

    Baseline % Endline %

    1 Total households 235 100 98 41.7

    2 Children in age group 0-6 months 19 - 7 -

    3 Colostrum and breastfeeding 5 26.3 7 100

    4 Children in the age group 0-1 year NA - 21 -

    5 Birth registration 0 0 0 0

    6 Children in the age group 0-3 years 90 - 45 -

    7 Full immunization 34 37.8 22 48.9

    8 Children in the age group 6-14 years 257 - 103 -

    9 Enrolled in school 184 71.6 103 100

    10 Children in the age group 14-18 years NA - 31 -

    11 Knowledge of HIV/AIDS NA 0 28 90.3

    12 Total marriages in the last 2 years 23 - 4 -

    13 Child marriage 9 39.1 0 0

    14 Families having access to

    safe drinking water source NA 0 97 99

    15 Deliveries occurring last year 73 - 21 -

    16 Institutional deliveries 8 11 5 23.8

    17 Use of iodized salt 78 33.2 96 98

    18 Toilets 95 40.4 77 78.6

    19 Use of toilets 39 41.1 70 90.9

    20 Hand-washing (only soap) NA 0 34 34.7

    9 National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme ensures 100 days of work at Rs. 80 per day for each

    family.

    1919191919

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    22/46

    Sironkhurd exhibited several benefits of VP, but overall, the planning exercise did not

    appear as dynamic as in Sunaura and the ongoing success of VP seemed to rest largely

    on the shoulders of a single volunteer.

    Members of the womens group identified several benefits of VP, in particular, that theyhad become more outgoing and aware of behaviour change issues such as exclusive

    breast feeding, sanitation and hand washing. Despite this, there was an acute lack of

    critical information among pregnant and lactating mothers. The level of involvement of

    women in the VP process was unclear. This was evidenced by the fact that, in spite of

    the severity of the problem of lack of institutional delivery services for women (with the

    nearest hospital being 10 kms. away), this major issue did not appear on the village

    action plan.

    Most significant changeIn the wake of the awareness generated by village planning, the Adolescent Girls

    Group in Sironkhurd had succeeded in mobilising the village to prevent a 16-year

    old girl, Shivani, from getting married.

    The women and girls together sang songs and performed skits relating to behaviour

    change communication. However, compared to Sunaura, the group lacked role clarity:

    the girls did not visit households to disseminate information and were unable to answer

    critical questions.

    As in other villages, the discussion with men about the benefits of VP suggested a lower

    level of involvement. They spoke about changes in women and childrens behaviour

    without mentioning any change in themselves.

    Direct benefits of VP could be seen in the ST hamlet of theSahariyas. They described

    how the issue of improper drainage around their hand pump was taken up and fixed

    during VP with the involvement of thePradhan and the Village Water Committee. This

    contributed to the overall improvement in access to safe drinking water in the village

    from nil to 100 per cent. Use of iodized salt and hand washing were the other behaviour

    change practices adopted by the ST community.

    One of the reasons for optimism for the future of VP is the fact that the village boasts an

    extremely active and committed volunteer. Malkan enjoys immense popularity among

    the villagers and gets enormous support from them. Added to this, he has family

    connections to thePradhan. Although thePradhan, her husband (thePradhanpati) and

    thePanchayatSecretary appeared to have participated very little in the VP process and

    2020202020

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    23/46

    to have very low levels of interest or knowledge about the issues on the action plan, the

    volunteers links to thePradhan raise the hope for greater integration in the future between

    demand generation and service delivery at the village level.

    Jamalpur

    The five day VP exercise in Jamalpur was conducted in November 2005 in the first

    phase of the district wide intervention. Jamalpur suffers from acute water shortages and

    consequently, poor harvests. Poverty is rampant in the village and is not limited to the

    Sahariya (ST) population, who migrate in search of work, often taking their families

    with them.

    Jamalpur has a sizeable Sahariya population and was chosen in order to study the

    difference that VP makes to socially excluded groups. The village is split in two by themain Jhansi road leaving the Sahariya hamlet on one side isolated from the services of

    the main village on the other. The Sahariya women travel 1 kilometre for water as the

    authorities lack the will to extend the water pipes to the other side of the road. Sahariya

    parents are hesitant to send children across the road to the primary school: two children

    died last year in road accidents and several were beaten up on their way to school.

    Shivakuwar Sahariya, one of the more educated girls of the village (currently in the 10th

    grade), who is now a village volunteer, has been running an open school for theSahariya

    community children. The VP initiative bolstered her efforts by providing slates, mats

    and charts for the children.

    Sarathis reassessment data suggest that changes in behaviour have been the most

    significant impact of VP. Exclusive breastfeeding has increased from 33.33 per cent to

    84.62 per cent, use of iodized salt from 6.90 per cent to 77.93 per cent, use of toilets

    from nil to 42.86 per cent and hand-washing with soap from nil to 44.83 per cent.

    Improving service delivery remains a challenge, as evidenced by the dismal 14.48 per

    cent of households with toilets and only 29.63 per cent of deliveries take place in hospitals

    because of the difficulties of finding transport to travel the necessary 14 kilometres.

    2121212121

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    24/46

    Table 7: Jamalpur-change indicators

    Indicators Jamalpur

    Baseline % Endline %

    1 Total households 145 100 145 1002 Children in age group 0-6 months 3 - 13 -

    3 Colostrum and breastfeeding 1 33.3 11 84.6

    4 Children in the age group 0-1 year 8 - 68 -

    5 Birth registration 0 0 68 0

    6 Children in the age group 0-3 years 19 - 60 -

    7 Full immunization 11 57.9 43 71.7

    8 Children in the age group 6-14 years 91 - 136 -

    9 Enrolled in school 88 96.7 134 98.5

    10 Children in the age group 14-18 years 39 - 71 -11 Knowledge of HIV/AIDS 10 25.6 21 29.6

    12 Total marriages in the last 2 years 3 - 7 -

    13 Child marriage 3 100 6 85.7

    14 Families having access to

    safe drinking water source 64 44.1 113 77.9

    15 Deliveries occurring last year 3 - 27 -

    16 Institutional deliveries 1 33.3 8 29.6

    17 Use of iodized salt 10 6.9 113 77.9

    18 Toilets 5 3.5 21 14.5

    19 Use of toilets 0 0 9 42.9

    20 Hand-washing (only soap) NA 0 65 44.8

    Most significant change

    TheAnganwadi Worker described the enormous difference that village volunteers

    made to her work. They help to mobilise the community and persuade those in the

    SC and ST communities of the importance of using her services. Crucially, they

    continue to help weigh all the children, enabling her to give tailored advice for

    children of different malnourishment grades.

    Dashrara

    This village, where VP did not take place was chosen for comparison purposes to

    understand better the impact of VP. Women in this village had a weaker understanding

    of issues related to health and pregnancy, sanitation, exclusive breast-feeding and other

    behaviour change issues. They admitted that no daughter or daughter-in-law in the village

    had passed high school, except theAnganwadi Worker (AWW) and that theKushwara

    2222222222

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    25/46

    community marries off their girls between the ages of 7-11 years. However, the women

    seemed unable to reflect on traditional practices or to see any need to change them.

    The adolescent girls of Dashrara are shy and those registered to assist theAnganwadi

    Worker do not visit the Centre. The mobilisation and tapping of human resources thathas occurred in villages where VP has taken place, through the creation of Community

    based organisations, was clearly lacking in Dashrara.

    The major problems in the village were similar to those in the other villages: water

    shortages, long distance between the village and the nearest hospital; migration of SC

    communities to neighbouring states in search of work and a consequent neglect of

    childrens education and immunizations. Although the AWC was in the process of being

    constructed, the village AWW was an impressive and credible post graduate, possessing

    critical information. The ANM also had a very good reputation and the governmentinfrastructure was well used by the village. This evidence of functional systems in

    Dashrara, make it an ideal site for VP intervention in the next phase.

    Impact

    Ideally, it would be expected that the impact of village planning is that community

    members are equipped with the skills to identify the challenges facing their community,

    and empowered with connections to the service delivery arm in order to solve them. Yet,

    in fact, the impact of VP is much broader and often much less tangible than this.

    Undoubtedly, VP has had a huge impact on generating demand for services. Various success

    stories such as the appointment of new teachers, installation and repairing of hand-pumps,

    scaling up registration of births and increasing the enrollment in primary schools- all

    highlight the success of VP in grassroots demand generation. But the more significant

    impact lying behind demand-generation is the ability of the community to identify, analyse

    and own challenges facing the village. It is this ability, fostered by the five-day stay of the

    VP facilitators in the village, which is one of the lasting impacts of the intervention.

    Changes in behaviour are another lasting impact of the VP intervention in these villages.

    Critical information was far more widely understood by community members where VP

    had taken place, and access to this information had clearly brought about impressive

    changes in behavioural patterns. In particular, the significance of the use of iodized salt

    was very well known among all community members. Similarly, awareness of the causes

    of HIV and its transmission was pervasive, save for members of the ST communities.

    Both the communities awareness of HIV and their willingness to discuss it without

    significant inhibitions are testament to the powerful impact of VP on this significant

    2323232323

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    26/46

    area of behaviour change. Unfortunately, understanding of the importance of exclusive

    breast feeding and critical information pertaining to the health of pregnant and lactating

    mothers was more tenuous. It varied significantly between the villages and also between

    the different communities of each village: perhaps testament to the strength of traditional

    beliefs about mothers first milk.

    The impact of village planning in empowering women and adolescent girls within their

    communities was impossible to miss. The women of Sunaura talked explicitly of their

    new-found courage to speak to and work with men in the village; the women of Sironkhurd

    spoke of being more outgoing as a result of the intervention. Comparing the adolescent

    girls of Dashrara with those of the villages where VP had taken place, a clear contrast

    emerges. This is a significant impact of VP, and its effects should not be underestimated.

    VP has also bolstered the cohesiveness of the different groups within the community.

    By establishing accountable actors in the village volunteers, by involving the children in

    the process of knowledge dissemination, by using the youth to conduct the household

    survey, and most importantly, by establishing Community based organisations to shoulder

    the responsibility of carrying forward behaviour change, VP has been extremely successful

    in fostering a sense of togetherness within each of these groups. Ultimately, it is not just

    togetherness within these groups that is important, but also convergence between them

    in working towards common goals. However, sights like childrens rallies, monthly

    meetings of adolescent girls groups, discussions of womens self help groups, speak of

    the impact of VP in instilling unity and purpose in each of these groups. This is clearly

    an important step towards convergence between the groups.

    As well as convergence of actors, village planning achieves convergence of sectors: health,

    education, nutrition, development and child protection. By their very nature, behavioural

    change issues connect different sectors which are usually dealt with in a compartmentalised

    manner both by development agencies and by the government. For example, exclusive breast-

    feeding engages questions of child nutrition and child health (traditionally mothers first

    milk is considered unclean, so the child is fed with goats milk or water, risking infection).

    Similarly, prevention of child marriage engages concerns of child protection, girls education,

    household work, maternal and child health (increased risk of complications in early pregnancies).

    Within the five-day village planning intervention, the villagers are educated about issues

    from all sectors, given an opportunity to evaluate the services of all sectors and devise

    solutions to all problems faced. The platform of village planning enables issues from all

    sectors to be dealt with holistically making clear the links between them. Besides that, by

    devising forums such as Block Task Force (BTF) and District Task Force (DTF), where

    different departments such as ICDS, Health, Development and Education meet, village

    planning also attempts to fight the challenge of silo-working in the government.

    2424242424

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    27/46

    Analysis and Recommendations

    We turn now to analyse the findings from the field in relation to the three key research

    questions.

    Service delivery

    Village level

    For the villages as a whole, it is evident that village planning has undeniably encouraged

    significant behavioural change among the villagers. This is true not just for the four

    behavioural change indicators (exclusive breast-feeding, use of iodized salt, HIV/AIDS

    awareness and hand-washing with soap), but also in relation to various services. For

    example, usage of toilets has increased in each village as a result of the intervention and

    demand for the construction of new toilets has increased. Similarly, demand for

    institutional delivery has increased, as has demand for birth registration.

    However, important though these changes are, generating demand for services is only

    half the battle. Ensuring an equal and opposite improvement in supply of services is

    also essential, if village planning is not to be just a recipe for raised and disappointed

    expectations. For example, despite the hype of the governments Total SanitationCampaign, toilet construction came across as one of the most intractable government

    services. A combination of cost of construction and long-winded procedural formalities

    for construction meant that the coverage of toilets had barely increased from 0.7 per

    cent to 1.4 per cent in Sunaura and from 3.5 per cent to 14.5 per cent in Jamalpur. The

    success in Sironkhurd, unfortunately, seemed like something of an outlier with coverage

    increasing by nearly 38 per cent to 78 per cent10. Similarly, despite the demand for

    safe institutional deliveries, the distant location of hospitals and the difficulty of

    procuring transport at night made meeting this demand unlikely. Finally, while the

    demand for birth registration has increased, there were a few cases where the issuing

    of birth certificates was obstructed at the village level. For instance, despite being

    provided with a list of children to be registered four months ago, thePanchayat

    Secretary of Sironkhurd, who resided in the Lalitpur district, had still failed to take

    any action to register the children.

    2525252525

    10

    See output tables, p. 18, 19 and 21

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    28/46

    Given the challenges of official-turnover at block and district level, the village level is the

    most crucial in ensuring effective service delivery and achieving integration between village

    planning and the government system. It appears the most important factors determining

    service delivery at the village level are the active involvement of thePradhan and his

    committee members in village planning and the functioning of the six committees: Water,

    Health, Education, Construction, Development and Planning. In all three villages, all but the

    Construction Committee (which deals with considerable amounts of money) were defunct

    and thePradhans openly admitted that most committee members do not even know which

    committee they are members of. Also, thePradhansknowledge of village planning was

    superficial and did not extend to any knowledge of the issues on the action plan.

    Recommendations

    ! ThePradhan and the members of all six committees should be explicitly and

    publicly involved in the village planning process.

    - Warm-up meetings should be held between Sarathi and thePradhan and

    members of the six committees during the zero day exercise to explain their

    role in village planning.

    - During the five-day process, groups of villagers should meet thePradhan

    and committee members as they meet other government service providers.

    ! ThePradhan and committee members need to be educated about the government

    welfare schemes to which the villagers are entitled. They must be clear about

    who is entitled to the schemes and how to achieve access, so that they can join

    with Sarathi and the volunteers in sharing this information with the community

    during village planning and while working to achieve access afterwards.

    If thePradhan is to take a more prominent role during village planning and in its follow

    up, certain capacity-building steps need to be taken. ThePradhans met by the team had

    painfully low levels of knowledge about the villages they represented, yet this would be

    easy to rectify, as the volunteers and frontline government workers often had access to

    all crucial information.

    Recommendations

    !

    ThePradhan must be provided with the village statistical data compiled by thevillage volunteers during the village planning exercise. On an ongoing basis,

    volunteers along with frontline government workers (AWW, ANM, headmaster,

    etc.) should update thePradhan on the progress made in their areas, so he is

    equipped with an updated picture of the village.

    ! Sarathis initiative to begin training forPradhans in the next phase of village

    planning is to be commended and, again, should be started at the beginning of

    any replication of the model. In addition, a forum forPradhans to share

    experiences and best practice in relation to village planning would be an important

    innovation.

    2626262626

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    29/46

    Block level

    The Block Task Force (BTF)11 is the block-level body charged with overseeing the village

    planning intervention. There are various concerns associated with the overseeing body

    being a time-limited task force, rather than the permanent structure of the Block

    Development Council, but in the short term, this should succeed in ensuring focus on VP.

    However, the BTF which is supposed to meet each quarter has only met twice in the two

    years that village planning has been existing. The agenda of the third meeting of the BTF

    held on 5th July 2007 (and attended by the research team) was to review existing challenges

    and set targets for the next six months. Although many challenges were noted by officials

    from the relevant sectors, little was achieved in terms of target-setting. Unfortunately,

    government officials seemed to view village planning as an NGO initiative, without

    seeing the burden on themselves to partner with that NGO in ensuring effective delivery

    of services and integration of village planning into the government system.

    Recommendations

    ! BTF meetings must be held regularly and frequently in order that effective working

    relationships between Sarathi and block officials can be developed and built

    upon.

    ! Visits of block level officials both to see village planning in action and to watch

    the training of village volunteers should be actively encouraged. Sarathis

    initiative to hold volunteer training at block offices to facilitate this, is much to

    be commended.

    ! In addition to the volunteers, villagePradhans should be encouraged to participate

    in BTF meetings. This will help in building relationships between the village

    and the block; it will also make the Pradhan upwardly accountable for the progress

    of VP in his/her village.

    District level

    Recommendations

    ! Visits of district level officials both to see village planning in action and to watch

    the training of village volunteers should be actively encouraged.

    ! The active engagement of Sarathi staff with the constantly changing district

    officials is to be commended. Timely orientation of new district officials,

    combined with visits to see VP should help to engage the individuals as well as

    the system at district level with VP.

    ! The process of elevating service delivery concerns to the district level through

    the Response Plans must be made robust.

    2727272727

    11 Membership includes the BDO, ADO, ABSA, MOIC, Child Development Project Officer (CDPO)

    ICDS, Junior Engineer Water Works Dept.

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    30/46

    The prime challenge at the district level is the frequent transfer of district officials. The

    District Magistrate has changed four times and the Chief Development Officer thrice

    since September 2006. Also, between the start of village planning in Lalitpur in August

    2005 and July 2007, the district has had three BSAs and five CMOs. Such high transfer

    rates account for low levels of awareness of VP among district officials and necessitatea cumbersome and recurring task for Sarathi of orientating new officials. However,

    more important than engaging the individuals is the challenge of engaging the system at

    the district level. As yet, there have been only two meetings of the DTF in two years12.

    The process of elevating service delivery concerns from the village and block level to

    the district level should be institutionalised, so that it is not disrupted by changes in

    district level personnel.

    Social inclusion

    Villages in Lalitpur are ridden with old social hierarchies and caste equations that can

    tip any development process, if not carefully negotiated. The dominant castes areBundelas

    and Brahmins; Lodhis, Yadavs and Kushwahas constitute the intermediate or Other

    Backward Castes (OBCs);Ahirwars, Banskars Dhanuks, Basrohs, Khatiks, Bednis,

    Balmiks andKoris belong to the Scheduled Castes (SC); whileKabutraras and Sahariyas

    are classified as Scheduled Tribes (ST).

    This section will address the impact of VP amongst the Sahariya13 community, in

    particular. Along with theKabutraras (who were not represented in our sample villages),

    Sahariyas are usually landless, always live on the fringes of their villages and are

    considered to be indifferent to immunization, nutritional advice and standard education.

    Through this focus on Sahariyas, we seek to make recommendations about larger

    questions of inclusiveness and participation.

    2828282828

    12 DTF membership includes the DM, BSA, CMO, District Project Officer - ICDS, and the Exec Engineer

    Water Dept.

    13 The population of Sahariyas has been estimated to be around one hundred thousand in Lalitpur and

    they also form a sizeable social group in some districts of MP and Rajasthan. They do not possess

    sufficient agricultural land to earn a livelihood from, so they augment their income by collecting minor

    forest produce. Sahariya women with loads of fire wood on their heads on their way to sell them are a

    common sight on roads. The depletion of forest cover had driven this historically exploited community

    into wage employment, particularly in stone mining. When stone mining activity ceased, it resulted in

    the collapse of their economic opportunities in Lalitpur, causing them to migrate to nearby districts for

    several months in a year.

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    31/46

    Volunteers

    ! More concentrated capacity-building efforts need to be focused on ST

    volunteers. The separate training for ST volunteers proposed by Sarathi for

    the next phase of the intervention is crucial and should be included from the

    outset when replicating the model

    village planning makes it a top priority to address social exclusion by selecting volunteers

    from each of the different social groups in the village. Identification of an ST volunteer

    is a hugely important symbolic step and is crucial to ensuring that the community has a

    link to VP. However, the success of a volunteer is largely dependent on the amount of

    support they receive from their community, and ST volunteers often receive little

    encouragement from their community. Sarathi pointed out the huge disparity in

    Sironkhurd between the amount of support the community-based trainer enjoys (also

    because he is related to thePradhan and some co-volunteers), and the volunteers from

    the Sahariya hamlet who struggle even to be recognised.

    Involvement and ownership

    Despite having a volunteer from their own community and despite village planning

    being by its very nature a participatory process, a sense of involvement in or ownership

    of the VP process by the ST community was acutely lacking. Certain ST community

    members were not sure that they had been present in the village at the time of the five-

    day VP intervention. The ST community members memories of the five-day process

    were, if anything, of people coming from the main village to explain things to them

    (behaviour change communication). There was no sense that the Sahariyas had

    themselves gone to the main village to participate in village-wide activities and, with

    one exception, no ST community members could identify any issues they had raised for

    the village action plan.

    Recommendations

    ! Ensure that the five-day VP process takes place when theSahariya community

    is present in the village and not migrating in search of work. This is the most

    basic barrier to their identification with the process.

    ! Strongly encourage ST community members to participate fully in village-wide

    activities. Whilst recognising that they are unlikely to feel able to speak up, atleast ensure that they are present as a step to engaging the less powerful and the

    more powerful in the same socio-political space.

    ! In this way, balance prescriptive and participatory elements of VP with respect

    to the Sahariya population, so that VP is not solely associated in their minds

    with exhortations to change behaviour.

    ! During the five-day VP exercise, more time needs to be devoted to identifying

    issues with the Sahariya community. If real needs are identified, the chances

    of the community identifying with and taking ownership of the Action Plan will

    be significantly increased.

    2929292929

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    32/46

    Behaviour change

    In the Sahariya hamlets of Sunaura, Sironkhurd and Jamalpur, the levels of knowledge

    about HIV/AIDS, use of iodized salt, exclusive breast-feeding and other behaviour change

    issues were painfully low. This would not have been helped by the manner in which

    critical information was communicated, or by the lack of ST involvement in theCommunity Based Organisations (CBO)that drive forward behaviour change.

    Recommendation

    ! At the risk of heightening traditional social fissures, the merits of establishing

    separate CBOs in the Sahariya hamlet should be considered on a village-by-

    village basis and particularly, where there is a sizeable Sahariya population.

    This may help to address the inadequate behaviour change trends and engender

    a sense of participation.

    Service delivery

    In all three villages, ST community members were less likely to access key services. In

    Jamalpur, the Anganwadi worker suggested that it was their ignorance and lack of

    education, which meant that they did not understand the significance of the AWC services

    and failed to send their children to the AWC. Similar arguments were made in Sironkhurd:

    it seems that service providers blame the STs for their lack of service access. Equally,

    ST community members were unlikely to have access to the numerous government

    schemes whose benefits they are entitled to. The government of India has an elaborate

    array of social welfare schemes, which prioritise socially excluded groups, yet these

    groups very rarely realise their rights to access these schemes.

    Recommendations

    ! More efforts need to be focused on breaking down the barriers to ST community

    members accessing key services; more efforts need to be focused on frontline

    service workers reminding them of their duty to provide services for all.

    ! village planning must place more emphasis on educating thePradhan, volunteers

    and community members on the government schemes whose benefits they are

    entitled to.

    ! To prove what VP can accomplish for ST community members, Field

    Coordinators should press for speedy sanctioning of ration cards and employment

    guarantee (NREG) cards and encourage the community to advocate for access

    to other schemes as a step towards addressing livelihood issues.

    Follow up

    Since it appears to take longer to generate in the ST community a sense of involvement

    in the VP process by way of the ability to identify issues affecting them and an

    3030303030

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    33/46

    understanding of how to solve them, the post-planning phase becomes more crucial for

    this community. Follow-up must not be limited to further advocating the need for

    behaviour change.

    Recommendations

    ! The post-planning stage needs to be vigorous in the ST hamlets. Field

    coordinators and volunteers should engage the community on a regular basis in

    identifying new issues and proposing solutions. In this way, this crucial skill will

    be instilled in the community members and the ST volunteer, so that ultimately

    they can run the process on their own.

    Sustainability

    Discussions of sustainability must take into account the different perspectives of the

    funders, the implementing NGO and the community. Given that village planning has to

    continue to be successful, once UNICEF concludes its funding and Sarathi withdraws

    from Lalitpur, it must be the communitys perspective on sustainability that takes

    precedence. The sustainability of the village planning intervention rests on the shoulders

    of the Community based organisations and the Pradhan and village committees,

    encouraged by the volunteers.

    Community based organisations

    Community based organisations should be at the heart of the VP process. These are

    grassroots institutions with potential for collective action and huge responsibility rests

    on their shoulders for pushing for follow up to the actions on the Village Action Plan

    and driving forward behaviour change in the village. The Womens self-help groups and

    the Adolescent Girls Groups can point to some considerable successes, but we came

    across several groups that lacked clarity of role and purpose.

    Recommendations

    ! More focus is needed on the CBOs, both in the five-day VP exercise, and in the

    work of the field coordinators in the post-planning stage. Specific tasks (be they

    household visits to communicate behaviour change information, monitoring

    progress and charting it on a change map, following up actions on the village

    action plan, etc.) need to be assigned to the CBOs early, on so they fully understand

    their purpose, and they need to be trained to carry out these tasks. Functionality

    of CBOs needs to be regularised across villages.

    ! Womens self-help groups should be encouraged to take on new roles, for example

    as thrift and trade groups supported by NABARD, or as Mothers Support Groups

    supported by ICDS. Such new roles will bolster their sense of identity and purpose

    and ensure that the group continues to function.

    3131313131

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    34/46

    Monitoring progress

    Monitoring progress should be an important component of the work of the CBOs. The

    change map used by adolescent girls in Sunaura was an impressive example of the role

    the CBOs could take in the monitoring progress. It had many benefits, among them

    engendering competition between the girls to ensure their own household was seen tobe a success and creating incentives to communicate critical information to the households

    for which they were responsible. Change maps have been used on and off by Sarathi

    during the course of the VP intervention.

    Recommendations

    ! Change mapping is critical to monitoring progress and celebrating the successes

    of VP. It is a useful tool to generate enthusiasm for the benefits of VP.

    ! Sarathi should design a suitably complex change map (along the lines of that

    used in Sunaura) that measures progress in each household against a number ofindicators. The CBOs in each village should be made responsible for regularly

    monitoring and recording change on the map.

    Dynamism

    With the exception of the village volunteers and some CBO members, most community

    members, including thePradhan, could not recall the issues on the Action Plan. Usually,

    VP is equated with encouragement of behaviour change and only when prompted, did

    some of our respondents remember that the Action Plan was painted on the village

    walls. What seemed to us a very visible call to action may have been seen by the

    villagers as no more than another IEC (Information Education Communication) notice

    painted on the walls.

    The greatest risk of the Action Plan is that it becomes a static document when it needs to

    be part of a dynamic process. For example, the first issue on the Sironkhurd Action Plan

    concerned the AWW coming late to the village every day. The proposed solution was for

    someone to explain to her the importance of coming on time. When the AWH was asked

    whether this had worked, she hesitantly said that it has not changed a thing. The nature

    of some of the solutions is such that though they are accomplished, the root cause of the

    problem may not have been solved. In the same Action Plan, it was noted that the children

    in the village are weak in their studies. The solution was to hold a joint parent-teacher

    meeting in the presence of thePradhan. Though the community members said that this

    had taken place, they found it difficult to say with any certainty whether it had improved

    the situation.

    3232323232

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    35/46

    Recommendations

    ! When the Action Plan is painted on the wall, blank rows and columns should be

    added. The community can use these rows to record the new issues they identify

    and the columns can be used to record progress against actions. In this way the

    Action Plan becomes not just a relic of a five-day intervention, but the focus of

    a dynamic and ongoing process of issue identification and solution.

    Consolidation

    It is critical to the success of the VP initiative to have time for thorough follow-up in

    each village. Simply drafting an Action Plan and setting up CBOs in a five-day

    intervention is not sufficient to ensure that the long-term aims of VP are met. The priority

    should be for consolidation over coverage, to ensure that full benefits are gained from

    the resources invested in VP. Those villages which had experienced thorough follow-up

    in the first phase clearly show the benefits of this approach.

    Recommendations

    ! It is crucial to slow down the implementation of village planning in Lalitpur.

    Rushing to complete 365 villages in the remaining 3 Blocks (which are more

    backward than the district hub) in the next four months seems counter-productive.

    ! More time and resources should be invested in timely follow-up with each village

    after the five-day VP intervention. More focus should be put on the important

    role of field coordinators in encouraging volunteers, working to embed CBOs,

    liaising with frontline government workers and driving progress against the Action

    Plan.

    Integration

    Critical to the sustainability of this project is the degree to which it is successful in

    integrating with existing government systems. Most issues raised by the VP process are

    capable of being tackled at the village level: integration at the village level should

    therefore, be the top priority.

    Recommendations

    ! The sixPanchayatcommittees need to be strengthened and used as the appropriate

    forum to follow up sectoral issues from the Action Plan and any further issuesthat arise in the post-planning phase.

    ! Village volunteers and CBO members should be encouraged to be active in the

    localPanchayatmeetings, which are the best forum for discussion of the issues

    raised in VP and beyond. This will engender a culture of participation in the

    local governance system and strengthen grassroots democracy, as well as effecting

    integration of VP into the government systems and thereby, preventing parallelism.

    3333333333

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    36/46

    As noted in the previous section, in all the villages visited, most of the localPanchayat

    committees were defunct as a result of which important local issues like health and

    education do not get discussed, although the resources for the solution of most problems

    are well within reach. However, it is far from impossible to revitalize these committees.

    In Sironkhurd, the village volunteer has succeeded in arranging a special meeting of theeducation committee on 9 July 2007. This is the season of school re-opening and

    admissions and the meeting agenda was to discuss the denial of school admission to

    children without birth certificates. ThePanchayatsecretary is also invited so that he can

    facilitate the issuing of the certificates from the block level on the spot.

    Response planning

    Response planning is an exercise undertaken to consolidate village action plans at the

    cluster level and identify common and specific issues across the cluster. The issues that

    need funds and responses from beyond the village are then tabulated and presented tothe block level officials for further action. Response Plans are crucial in facilitating

    communication with the block and district levels, by translating the mass of village-

    level information into neat cluster-level tables that block and district officials can easily

    digest. It is a key tool in opening dialogue with the service delivery wing. So far, Response

    Planning has been completed for 12 clusters covering 151 revenue villages.

    Recommendations

    ! Response Planning needs to take place much sooner after the village planning

    intervention. In this way, it can form the regularised mechanism to feed back to

    the block and district level officials the service needs at the grassroots and facilitate

    more rapid response on behalf of the government.

    3434343434

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    37/46

    Conclusion

    Having considered the three key questions, the conclusions arrived at by the research

    team are as below.

    Social inclusion remains one of the key challenges to the success of village planning.

    Traditional hierarchies in the villages are slow to change. Despite inclusion of all

    groups being an inherent feature of the design of village planning, lack of ownership

    of the village planning process by socially excluded groups (especially, STs) remains

    a significant impediment. Focused attention and more rigorous follow-up with these

    social groups are required to ensure that the benefits of village planning are sharedequally by all.

    Village planning has been very successful in generating demand for services on the part

    of the community. But this increased demand still needs to be met by an equal and

    opposite improvement in supply. Sarathi is now making considerable strides to address

    the challenge of inadequate service delivery (for example, cluster level response planning,

    meetings of the block and district task force), sensitive to the dynamics of the relationship

    between an NGO and government, but there is still a long way to go. Any future attempts

    to replicate this model should address this vigorously from the start, making every attempt

    to integrate the government at all levels in the work of the intervention.

    Integration with the government system is ultimately what will determine the

    sustainability of the intervention. Success in this will ensure that village planning moves

    beyond being a project to being an empowering and sustainable approach. Intensity of

    follow-up with each village in the immediate aftermath of village planning is crucial to

    making this approach self-sustaining. Given this, attempting to cover over 300 villages

    in the most backward blocks of the Lalitpur district in four months (as required by the

    December 2007 deadline for all seventeen village planning districts) risks not realising

    the full benefits of the investment in the intervention. Consolidation must be prioritised

    over coverage.

    3535353535

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    38/46

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    39/46

    Annexure I

    A: Map of Lalitpur district,UP

    3737373737

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    40/46

    B: NyayaPanchayats - At a glance

    S No Name of Nyaya Number of Number of Total HHs HHs %age

    Panchayat Gram Revenue Covered

    Panchayats VillagesBirdha Block

    1 Birdha 8 14 3377 1226 36.3

    2 Jeeron 4 10 1337 484 36.2

    3 Dongrakala 7 19 2370 872 36.8

    4 Simardha 6 17 2180 377 17.2

    Jakhaura Block

    5 Nanaura 7 13 2761 1236 44.8

    6 Lagaun 7 12 2451 976 39.8

    7 Sirsi 5 8 1948 755 38.78 Thanvara 5 9 1896 678 35.7

    Talbehat Block

    9 Sunaura 5 13 2033 885 43.5

    10 Banguankala 7 12 3698 824 22.3

    11 Pooravirdha 6 11 3154 1118 35.4

    12 Servaskala 6 13 2784 1113 39.9

    TOTAL 73 151 29989 10544 35.1

    Sample of Reassessment Survey - A Brief Report on Reassessment Analysis, Sarathi

    Development Foundation, 2006

    3838383838

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    41/46

    3939393939

    C

    :Excerptfromanactionp

    lanJamalpur

    S

    No:Issue

    Problem

    Reason

    Solution

    P

    rogress

    Forwhom

    DeadlineResponsibility

    Monitoring

    Authorities

    Concerned

    1

    Drinking

    Nodrinking

    Pipelineis

    Pipelineto

    T

    hePanchayat

    Community

    19.11.0

    5

    Prakash

    Pappu

    Government,

    water

    water.

    notlaiddown

    coverthe

    h

    aspassedthe

    Pradhanpati

    (Prem

    Panchayat,

    completely.

    entirevillage.resolution.

    Narayan)

    UNICEF

    Waterfrom

    OldtankstoP

    roblem

    thehandpump

    berepaired

    b

    roughttothe

    driesoutfrom

    ornewonesn

    oticeofthe

    January

    tobebuilt.

    w

    aterworks

    onwards.

    d

    epartment.

    Only3of24

    F

    undshave

    handpumps

    b

    een

    work.

    s

    anctioned.

    2

    Secondary

    One

    Shortageof

    Teachersto

    P

    anchayatand

    Children

    30.11.0

    5

    Education

    RajaBhaiya

    ABSA

    school

    headmaster

    teachers

    beappointed.theEducation

    committee,

    teacher

    andonepara

    c

    ommittee

    Pradhan

    teacherfor

    w

    ouldadvocate.

    443students.

    The

    Thereisa

    Newschool

    childrenfrom

    highway

    tobeopened.

    theSahariy

    a

    betweenthe

    hamletdon

    t

    villageand

    gotoschoo

    l.

    theschool

    Drinkingwater

    Nodrinking

    Boringhas

    Drinking

    A

    pplicationto

    29.11.0

    5

    Sonia,UmaDevi

    Jitendra

    ABSA

    inJuniorand

    waterfor

    beendone

    watertobe

    b

    esubmittedto

    secondaryschools.children

    thriceinthe

    made

    theABSA.

    childrenhave

    secondary

    availabletoE

    ducation

    togobackhome

    schools,but

    thechildren.c

    ommitteeto

    ortoawell

    thereisstillno

    Handpump

    c

    onsiderthe

    situated50mfrom

    drinkingwater.tobe

    m

    atter.

    theschool.

    repaired.

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    42/46

    4040404040

    S

    No:Issue

    Problem

    Reason

    Solution

    P

    rogress

    Forwhom

    DeadlineResponsibility

    Monitoring

    Authorities

    Concerned

    3

    Anganwadi

    Childrenare

    Childrenare

    Children

    P

    arentsand

    Children

    25.11.0

    5

    JaipalSingh,

    Manoj

    Panchayat

    notbeing

    malnourished.

    shouldgotoA

    WWtohold

    Panchayat

    weighed

    fiveoutof28

    the

    a

    meeting.

    childrenare

    Anganwadi

    underthird

    centreon

    gradeof

    timeandthe

    malnutrition.

    AWWto

    weighthem

    ontime.

    4

    Toilets

    Problems

    Notoilets.The

    Construct

    T

    hose

    Community

    Pancha

    yat

    Pradhan

    Panchayat

    Block,

    experienced

    existingtoilets

    propertoiletsinterestedtoget

    toprop

    ose

    (UmaDevi)

    members

    UNICEF

    duringnigh

    ts

    arenotusable.

    withwater

    toilets

    afterBlock

    supply

    c

    onstructed

    gives

    s

    houldgive

    directions.

    theirnamesto

    thePradhan

    5

    Birthcertificate

    Children

    Thereareno

    Birth

    P

    anchayathas

    Children

    Indefin

    ite

    Pradhan,

    Community

    Block

    dont

    birth

    certificates

    a

    skedthe

    secretaryand

    members

    haveidentity

    certificates

    tobeissuedsecretaryto

    community

    issuethem

  • 8/8/2019 03 Village Planning Report

    43/46

    Thematic Area

    Education

    Specific issues

    In village Sunauri 336

    children, in the absence

    of primary schoolbuilding, are left with no

    option but to sit in

    PanchayatBhawan

    building having a

    capacity of 3 small

    rooms where an

    Anganwadi centre is

    also functioning

    Children in village

    Piprai are required to

    travel a distance of 5-6

    kms. to reach the upper

    primary school

    ! There is one

    headmaster and 2 para

    teachers for 336 children

    in Sunauri (112:1)

    ! In Hasguan there is

    only 1 para teacher for

    92 children

    After a gap of two

    academic years the

    children in upper

    primary school

    Radhapur have finally

    got a teacher posted in

    their school but the

    classes are still being

    organized in primary

    school building

    Common issues

    In spite of well

    intentioned efforts only

    93.1% children in theage group 6-14 years

    could be enrolled in

    school

    In primary schools 1837

    children are enrolled in

    the academic year 2006-

    07. For all these children

    the opportunities for

    higher learning is

    restricted to only 04

    upper primary schools at

    the cluster level

    Although at the cluster

    level teacher: student

    ratio is 1:45 yet there are

    number of schools

    where quality of

    education is suffering

    due to absence of

    teachers

    Proposed Solutions

    ! Primary school

    building has been

    constructed but has notyet cleared quality check

    inspection. BDO would

    write to the educ


Recommended