+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 03090569310039705.pdf

03090569310039705.pdf

Date post: 09-Jul-2016
Category:
Upload: mohammed2009246
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
24
European Journal of Marketing An Integrated Model of Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations Ruud T. Frambach Article information: To cite this document: Ruud T. Frambach, (1993),"An Integrated Model of Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27 Iss 5 pp. 22 - 41 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569310039705 Downloaded on: 23 April 2016, At: 11:38 (PT) References: this document contains references to 0 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3149 times since 2006* Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: (2010),"Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 13 Iss 2 pp. 197-221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040258 (2005),"Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 20 Iss 7 pp. 380-393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620510628614 (1989),"Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its solutions", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 6 Iss 2 pp. 5-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542 Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:198643 [] For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download. Downloaded by STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY At 11:38 23 April 2016 (PT)
Transcript

European Journal of MarketingAn Integrated Model of Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of InnovationsRuud T. Frambach

Article information:To cite this document:Ruud T. Frambach, (1993),"An Integrated Model of Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations", European Journalof Marketing, Vol. 27 Iss 5 pp. 22 - 41Permanent link to this document:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569310039705

Downloaded on: 23 April 2016, At: 11:38 (PT)References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.To copy this document: [email protected] fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3149 times since 2006*

Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:(2010),"Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model", European Journal of InnovationManagement, Vol. 13 Iss 2 pp. 197-221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040258(2005),"Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes", Journal of Business &Industrial Marketing, Vol. 20 Iss 7 pp. 380-393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620510628614(1989),"Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its solutions", Journal of Consumer Marketing,Vol. 6 Iss 2 pp. 5-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:198643 []

For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors serviceinformation about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visitwww.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.

About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio ofmore than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of onlineproducts and additional customer resources and services.

Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on PublicationEthics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

This article has been cited by:

1. Latif Al-Hakim, Nik Ab Halim Nik Abdullah, Eric Ng. 2014. The Effect of Inter-Organization Trust and Dependency onE-Procurement Adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 10:10.4018/JECO.20120401, 40-60. [CrossRef]

2. Frank Wiengarten, Brian Fynes, Edwin T.C. Cheng, Roberto Chavez. 2013. Taking an innovative approach to quality practices:exploring the importance of a company’s innovativeness on the success of TQM practices. International Journal of ProductionResearch 51, 3055-3074. [CrossRef]

3. Naresh Malhotra and Satyabhusan DashShashi Shekhar MishraDepartment of Industrial and Management Engineering,Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India K.B. SajiIndian Institute of Management Lucknow, Lucknow, India. 2013.The impact of institutional variables in new high‐tech product development processes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning31:2, 160-178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

4. R. Cervelló-Royo, J.-C. Cortés, A. Sánchez-Sánchez, F.-J. Santonja, R.-J. Villanueva. 2013. Forecasting Latin America’sCountry Risk Scores by Means of a Dynamic Diffusion Model. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013, 1-11. [CrossRef]

5. Tao (Tony) Gao, Gordon Leichter, Yinghong (Susan) Wei. 2012. Countervailing effects of value and risk perceptions inmanufacturers' adoption of expensive, discontinuous innovations. Industrial Marketing Management 41, 659-668. [CrossRef]

6. K. B. Saji, Shashi Shekhar Mishra. 2012. Antecedents and consequences of technology acquisition intent: empirical evidencefrom global high-tech industry. Journal of Strategic Marketing 20, 165-183. [CrossRef]

7. Marios TheodosiouDepartment of Public and Business Administration, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus EvangeliaKatsikeaDepartment of Marketing and Communication, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece. 2012.Antecedents and performance of electronic business adoption in the hotel industry. European Journal of Marketing 46:1/2,258-283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

8. Zack W. Almquist, Carter T. Butts. 2012. Point process models for household distributions within small areal units.Demographic Research 26, 593-632. [CrossRef]

9. Nicole Vowles, Peter Thirkell, Ashish Sinha. 2011. Different determinants at different times: B2B adoption of a radicalinnovation. Journal of Business Research 64, 1162-1168. [CrossRef]

10. Claudio Dell'Era, Roberto Verganti. 2011. Diffusion Processes of Product Meanings in Design-Intensive Industries:Determinants and Dynamics*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28:10.1111/jpim.2011.28.issue-6, 881-895.[CrossRef]

11. Wen ZhangResearch on Innovation-Generating and Innovation-Transferring 1-4. [CrossRef]12. Yanuar Nugroho. 2011. Opening the black box: The adoption of innovations in the voluntary sector—The case of Indonesian

civil society organisations. Research Policy 40, 761-777. [CrossRef]13. Kuo-Feng Huang. 2011. Technology competencies in competitive environment. Journal of Business Research 64, 172-179.

[CrossRef]14. J.-C. Cortés, I.-C. Lombana, R.-J. Villanueva. 2010. Age-structured mathematical modeling approach to short-term diffusion

of electronic commerce in Spain. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 52, 1045-1051. [CrossRef]15. Bertha Maya Sopha, Christian A. Klöckner, Geir Skjevrak, Edgar G. Hertwich. 2010. Norwegian households’ perception of

wood pellet stove compared to air-to-air heat pump and electric heating. Energy Policy 38, 3744-3754. [CrossRef]16. Professor Dimitris AssimakopoulosDimitris AssimakopoulosLINC Lab, Grenoble Ecole de Management, Grenoble, France

Herman WuHong Kong Institute of Technology, Hong Kong. 2010. Diffusion of VoIP in Chinese large enterprises: the casesof Air China and Harvest Fund. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China 2:1, 7-24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

17. Gary L. Simon, Dianne H.B. Welsh. 2010. International professional service firms: how do they affect government policy?.The Service Industries Journal 30, 11-23. [CrossRef]

18. Professor Heikki KarjaluotoValerie L. VaccaroDepartment of Marketing, College of Business and Public Administration,Kean University, Union, New Jersey, USA. 2009. B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage.Journal of Systems and Information Technology 11:4, 315-330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

19. Sami Kristian HäggmanHelsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. 2009. Functional actors and perceptions ofinnovation attributes: influence on innovation adoption. European Journal of Innovation Management 12:3, 386-407. [Abstract][Full Text] [PDF]

20. C Martin, M Metcalfe, H Harris. 2009. Developing an implementation capacity: justifications from prior research. Journalof the Operational Research Society 60, 859-868. [CrossRef]

21. Syed Shah AlamFaculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebansaan, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia. 2009. Adoption ofinternet in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 16:2, 240-255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

22. Dae‐Young Kim. 2009. THE MODERATING EFFECT OF INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ONINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE: THE CASE OF U.S. CVBS' INTERNET MARKETING. Journalof Travel & Tourism Marketing 26, 329-343. [CrossRef]

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

23. Carol VanDeusen Lukas, David C. Mohr, Mark Meterko. 2009. Team Effectiveness and Organizational Context in theImplementation of a Clinical Innovation. Quality Management in Health Care 18, 25-39. [CrossRef]

24. ARASH AZADEGAN, KEVIN J. DOOLEY, PHILLIP L. CARTER, JOSEPH R. CARTER. 2008. SUPPLIERINNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCINGMANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES. Journal of Supply Chain Management 44:10.1111/jscm.2008.44.issue-4, 14-35.[CrossRef]

25. Carol VanDeusen Lukas, Mark M. Meterko, David Mohr, Marjorie Nealon Seibert, Renee Parlier, Odette Levesque, RobertA. Petzel. 2008. Implementation of a Clinical Innovation. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 31, 94-108. [CrossRef]

26. Satyabhusan Dash, K. B. Saji. 2008. The Role of Consumer Self-Efficacy and Website Social-Presence in Customers' Adoptionof B2C Online Shopping. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 20, 33-48. [CrossRef]

27. Chris Knowles, Eric Hansen, Steven R. Shook. 2008. Assessing innovativeness in the North American softwood sawmillingindustry using three methods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 363-375. [CrossRef]

28. Youcheng Wang. 2008. Web-based destination marketing systems: assessing the critical factors for management andimplementation. International Journal of Tourism Research 10:10.1002/jtr.v10:1, 55-70. [CrossRef]

29. Radiah Othman Jamaliah Said. 2007. Enhancing Control Through Participation: Issues of Conflicts in Public SectorOrganizations. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 5:1, 71-86. [Abstract] [PDF]

30. Robert ParentUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebéc, Canada. Mario RoyUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke,Quebéc, Canada. Denis St‐JacquesUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebéc, Canada.. 2007. A systems‐based dynamicknowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management 11:6, 81-93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

31. Youcheng Wang, William Qualls. 2007. Towards a theoretical model of technology adoption in hospitality organizations.International Journal of Hospitality Management 26, 560-573. [CrossRef]

32. Paulina Papastathopoulou, George J. Avlonitis, Nikolaos G. Panagopoulos. 2007. Intraorganizational information andcommunication technology diffusion: Implications for industrial sellers and buyers. Industrial Marketing Management 36,322-336. [CrossRef]

33. Fariborz Damanpour, J. Daniel Wischnevsky. 2006. Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 23, 269-291.[CrossRef]

34. Bonnie Bressers. 2006. Promise and Reality: The Integration of Print and Online Versions of Major Metropolitan Newspapers.International Journal on Media Management 8, 134-145. [CrossRef]

35. Helen GabrielLondon Metropolitan University, UK Rita KottaszLondon Metropolitan University, UK Roger BennettLondonMetropolitan University, UK. 2006. Advertising planning, ad‐agency use of advertising models, and the academic practitionerdivide. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 24:5, 505-527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

36. Boaz Bernstein, Prakash J. Singh. 2006. An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnologyfirms. Technovation 26, 561-572. [CrossRef]

37. Risto T. Salminen, Kristian Möller. 2006. Role of References in Business Marketing–Towards a Normative Theory ofReferencing. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 13, 1-51. [CrossRef]

38. Graydon Davison. 2006. Palliative care teams and the contingencies that impact them: a background. Progress in PalliativeCare 14:1, 1-8. [CrossRef]

39. Gerrit W. Ziggers. 2005. Radical Product Innovation in the Dutch Food Industry. Journal of Food Products Marketing 11,43-65. [CrossRef]

40. Arch G. Woodside and Wim BiemansArch G. WoodsideBoston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA Wim G.BiemansUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2005. Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion andadoption/rejection processes. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 20:7, 380-393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

41. S. Apolloni, M.M. SavinoEcological plant indicator development for a small sized enterprise 6 pp.. [CrossRef]42. Hosein GharaviWorking for e‐Business Research Centre, School of Management Information Systems, Edith Cowan

University, Joondalup, Australia , Peter E.D. LoveWorking for e‐Business Research Centre, School of ManagementInformation Systems, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia Eddie W.L. ChengWorking for e‐Business ResearchCentre, School of Management Information Systems, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. 2004. Information andcommunication technology in the stockbroking industry: an evolutionary approach to the diffusion of innovation. IndustrialManagement & Data Systems 104:9, 756-765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

43. Namatie Traore, Antoine Rose. 2003. Determinants of biotechnology utilization by the Canadian industry. Research Policy32, 1719-1735. [CrossRef]

44. Gracie Lawson‐Borders. 2003. Integrating new media and old media: Seven observations of convergence as a strategy for bestpractices in media organizations. International Journal on Media Management 5, 91-99. [CrossRef]

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)

45. Shengnan HanInstitute for Advanced Management Systems, Research & Turku Centre for Computer Science, Åbo AkademiUniversity, Lemminkainengatan 14B, Fin‐20520 Abo, Finland Ville HarkkeInstitute for Advanced Management Systems,Research & Turku Centre for Computer Science, Åbo Akademi University, Lemminkainengatan 14B, Fin‐20520 Abo,Finland Par Landor RuggeroInstitute for Advanced Management Systems, Research & Turku Centre for ComputerScience, Åbo Akademi University, Lemminkainengatan 14B, Fin‐20520 Abo, Finland Rossi de MioInstitute for AdvancedManagement Systems, Research & Turku Centre for Computer Science, Åbo Akademi University, Lemminkainengatan 14B,Fin‐20520 Abo, Finland. 2002. A foresight framework for understanding the future of mobile commerce. Journal of Systemsand Information Technology 6:2, 19-40. [Abstract] [PDF]

46. Graydon DavisonGraydon Davison ([email protected]) is a member of the Innovation and Continuous ImprovementTechnologies (InCITe) Research Centre, School of Management, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, Australia.PaulHylandPaul Hyland ([email protected]) is a member of the Innovation and Continuous Improvement Technologies(InCITe) Research Centre, School of Management, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, Australia. . 2002. Palliativecare teams and organisational capability. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 8:3/4, 60-67. [Abstract][Full Text] [PDF]

47. Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz, Aric Bizzari, Rebecca Graham, Catherine Howdyshell. 2001. Business-to-Business OnlinePurchasing: Suppliers' Impact on Buyers' Adoption and Usage Intent. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 37:10.1111/jscm.2001.37.issue-1, 4-10. [CrossRef]

48. Benoit A Aubert, Geneviève Hamel. 2001. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector:. Social Science & Medicine 53,879-894. [CrossRef]

49. Jon D Kendall, Lai Lai Tung, Khoon Hui Chua, Chia Hong Dennis Ng, Suan Meng Tan. 2001. Receptivity of Singapore'sSMEs to electronic commerce adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 10, 223-242. [CrossRef]

50. Kakoli Bandyopadhyay, Lawrence L. Schkade. 2001. Disaster Recovery Planning by HMOs: Theoretical Insights. HealthCare Management Review 25, 74-84. [CrossRef]

51. S. Kurnia, R.B. Johnston. 2000. The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption. The Journal ofStrategic Information Systems 9, 295-319. [CrossRef]

52. David A. Reid, Richard E. Plank. 2000. Business Marketing Comes of Age: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 7, 9-186. [CrossRef]

53. Morgan P Miles, Linda S Munilla, Timothy McClurg. 1999. The impact of ISO 14000 environmental management standardson small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Quality Management 4, 111-122. [CrossRef]

54. Michael R. Neale, David R. Corkindale. 1998. Co-developing products: Involving customers earlier and more deeply. LongRange Planning 31, 418-425. [CrossRef]

55. Ruud T Frambach, Harry G Barkema, Bart Nooteboom, Michel Wedel. 1998. Adoption of a service innovation in the businessmarket: An empirical test of supply-side variables. Journal of Business Research 41, 161-174. [CrossRef]

56. Vassilis Papadakis, Dimitris Bourantas. 1998. The chief executive officer as corporate champion of technological innovation:aii empirical investigation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10, 89-110. [CrossRef]

57. R. Agarwal, M. Tanniru, D. Wilemon. 1997. Assimilating information technology innovations: strategies and moderatinginfluences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44, 347-358. [CrossRef]

58. Ruud T. Frambach, Inge Wels-Lips, Arjan Gündlach. 1997. Proactive product service strategies: An application in theEuropean health market. Industrial Marketing Management 26, 341-352. [CrossRef]

59. Indrit TroshaniTowards Theory Development for Emergent E-Business Innovations 205-222. [CrossRef]60. Viveka Ramoo, T. Ramayah, May-Chiun Lo, Teoh Ai PingElectronic Tax Filing 147-156. [CrossRef]

Dow

nloa

ded

by S

TA

FFO

RD

SHIR

E U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y A

t 11:

38 2

3 A

pril

2016

(PT

)


Recommended