Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | egbert-foster |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
19.04.23 1
Loan and Income Diversification Strategies and Performances of Turkish
Banks
Yetkin ÇINAR, Ph.D.Yetkin ÇINAR, Ph.D.
Asst. Prof.Asst. Prof.,, Faculty of Political Sciences, Faculty of Political Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara University, TurkeyTurkeyPost-Doctoral Researcher, HSE, MoscowPost-Doctoral Researcher, HSE, Moscow
19.04.23 2
Introduction
Recent Trends and Structural Characteristics in Recent Trends and Structural Characteristics in Turkish Banking SectorTurkish Banking Sector
19.04.23 33
Recent Trends and Structural Characteristics of Turkish Banking Sector
Structural Chracteristics of Turkish Banking SectorStructural Chracteristics of Turkish Banking Sector
Number of BanksNumber of BranchesTotal Assets$Share of 10 largest banks by Total Assets (%)Share of Foreign Equity$Deposits$Loans$Non-Performing Loans (Net)$Shareholders’ Equity$ROA
19.04.23 44
Recent Financial Crisis and TBS
After overcoming the impacts of the 2001 crisis, i.e., After overcoming the impacts of the 2001 crisis, i.e., between the years 2003 and 20between the years 2003 and 2012;12;
Turkish Banking Sector showed a rapid growth performanceTurkish Banking Sector showed a rapid growth performance, , except from except from the effects of global crisis in 2008 and fluctuations in 2005 and 2006the effects of global crisis in 2008 and fluctuations in 2005 and 2006..
RRapid growth in the banking sector raiseapid growth in the banking sector raise foreign fund entry but, incurred foreign fund entry but, incurred lower profit margins.lower profit margins.
FFaced with a more competitive environment, banks had to account for loan aced with a more competitive environment, banks had to account for loan losses while increasing their loan supply to become more profitable.losses while increasing their loan supply to become more profitable...
19.04.23 5
What is the Role of Diversification?& Its relationships between
Performance and Risk
Diversification and Performance of Banks – Previous StudiesDiversification and Performance of Banks – Previous Studies
Possible Relations between Performance, Risk and Possible Relations between Performance, Risk and DiversificationDiversification
The Objective and The Scope of The Objective and The Scope of This This ResearchResearch
19.04.23 66
Diversification and Performance of Banks – Previous Studies
Acharya et.al. (2006), Meyer & Yeager (2001), Stiroh & Rumble (2006), Mercieca et al. (2007), Hayden et al. (2007), Kamp et al. (2007), Baele et al. (2007), Berger et al. (2010),
Tabak et al. (2011).…analyze thanalyze the relationship between diversification and e relationship between diversification and
performance…. in Italy, Germany, Brasil, EU-15, US Canada, performance…. in Italy, Germany, Brasil, EU-15, US Canada, China …China …
However, tHowever, the empirical findings assert that diversification of he empirical findings assert that diversification of bankbank’s’s assets or incomes is not guaranteed to produce superior assets or incomes is not guaranteed to produce superior
performance and/or greater safety for banksperformance and/or greater safety for banks
19.04.23 77
The Objective and The Scope of Research
n the effects of loan and income diversification the effects of loan and income diversification strategies on the performance strategies on the performance (and risk) (and risk) of Turkish of Turkish
banksbanks
n over the period 2005–2011, which includes the over the period 2005–2011, which includes the fluctuations in 2006 and 2008-2009 fluctuations in 2006 and 2008-2009 global financial global financial
crisis.crisis.
This paper empirically analyzesThis paper empirically analyzes;;
Our Sample
n In Turkish banking sector, there are 45 banks, 32 of them are commercial banks.
n They consist of 3 state-owned, 11 private (Turkish), 17 foreign banks in terms of ownership characteristics and one of them is under the control of Savings Deposit Insurance Fund.
n 20 commercial banks can be taken into account in 7 years: 2005-2011. However, they represent %95 of total assets in Turkish Banking Sector.
19.04.23 8
19.04.23 9
Methodology & Application
Diversification Measure and Its “Related” and Diversification Measure and Its “Related” and “Unrelated” Components: Entropy Models“Unrelated” Components: Entropy Models
Relationships between bank returns, risk and Relationships between bank returns, risk and diversification: Panel Data Analysesdiversification: Panel Data Analyses
Diversification Measure and Its “Related” and “Unrelated” Components: Entropy Models
n In this paper, diversification is measured by Entropy methodology (Shannon, 1948; Palepu, 1985), so as to distinguish the total diversification into related and unrelated components.
n Entropy indices distinguishes between diversification within groups which consist of highly-related components and diversification across these groups.
19.04.23 10
Formally;n Let the amount of exposure of bank b at time t to each sector / product (or the amount of each
type of earning) i denoted as Xibt, where (i = 1…m).
n Then, relative amount of the exposure / earnings in total amount of loan exposure / earnings will be;
19.04.23 11
n The total diversification (TD) of this bank, at the given point of time is measured by this equation, by the entropy measure:
ibt
m
iibtbt PPTD
1ln.
1
m
iibt
ibtibt
X
XP
1
The Meaning of Entropy;
19.04.23 12
n If TD is near to 0 then it means the loan portfolio of the bank is highly concentrated (low diversified or highly focused).
n On the other side, if relative exposures very close to each other, then TD takes higher values; at the extreme point if they are equally distributed, then TD takes its highest value (perfect diversification).
Calculation of the Components of Diversification;
IF there is, m type of loans / earnings in n group, where m > n. Then in any jth group the diversification of is measured by; “Within Group Diversification” or “Related Entropy” measure
AGD: Across Groups or Unrelated Diversification (AGD)
19.04.23 13
j
n
j
j
PPAGD
1ln.
1
AGDTWGDTD
j
ibtji
jibtj
PPWGD
1ln. j
n
jj PWETWGD .
1
It’s been shown that;It’s been shown that;
Relationships between bank returns, risk and diversification: Panel Data Analysesn This paper’s aim is to show empirically that the
relationship between diversification strategy and a bank’s performance (profitability and risk) depends on the degree or type of diversity;
q diversification in interest and non-interest incomes, q industrial, q borrowersq diversification with respect to financial products and q related versus unrelated diversification.
19.04.23 14
19.04.23 15
Measures calculated from Diversification Strategies: Independent
Variables
Diversification Strategies -1: Loan Diversification in terms of Financial Products
19.04.23 16
Loan Diversification in
terms of Financial Products
(Borrowers)
Gr. (A): Consumer Loans
- Housing ,
- Vehicle,
- Consumer,
- Credit Cards,
- Other
-Gr. (B): Commercial - Business Loans;
- Vehicle
- Corporate Credit Cards
- Other
Diversification Strategies -2: Loan Diversification in Industries (Sectors)
19.04.23 17
Loan
Diversification in
Industries
(Sectors)
Gr. (A): Agricultural sector;- Farming and raising livestock, - Forestry, - Fishing Gr. (B): Manufacturing sector;- Mining - Production - Electric, gas and water Gr. (C): The Construction sector (in a single item) Gr. (D): Wholesale and retail trade;- Hotel, food and beverage services, - Transportation and telecommunication, - Financial institutions, - Real estate and rental services, - Self-employement services, - Education services, - Health and social services in the Services sector Gr. (E): Other sectors which are not classified above (in a single item)
Diversification Strategies -3: Income Diversification – Interest vs. non-Interest Revenues
19.04.23 18
Income
Diversification w.r.t.
interest and non-interest
revenues
Gr. (A): Interest based revenues; revenues from;- borrowers (loans)- banks- financial market operations- treasury bonds and issues- other Gr. (B): Non-Interest based revenues;revenues from;- dividends- Fees and Commissionsrevenues from- dividends- Fees and Commissions
19.04.23 19
Performance Measures: Dependent Variables
and Control Factors
Panel Data Analyses: Performance and Risk Measuresn In panels, performance of the banks is evaluated in
two dimensions:
q Profitability: Return On Assets (ROA) of banksq Loan Risk: Measured in terms of ln (NPL / Assets)
Consistency (Stability): The standart deviation and the differences between actual data and trend values of the mean values of performance measures (ROA and ROE) are also calculated and used in a Linear regressions.
19.04.23 20
Panel Data Analyses: Control FactorsIn this study different control variables are used.
These are the banks’;
nSize: In order to observe whether size of the bank is important in the relationship between diversification and risk or return, we control for size by using a variable measured by Assets in the regressions.
nOwnership Structure: In order to test whether ownership structure of the banks affects the results, the ownership dummies are used, i.e. state-owned, private (Turkish) or foreign-owned banks.
nMacroeconomic Factors: In order the capture the crisis and fluctuation period effects, time dummy is used which reflects the changes in the years 2008 - 2010 and 2006.
19.04.23 21
Panel Data Analyses: FormulationsRelationship between banks’s return and diversification measures is investigated by running two type of regressions:
19.04.23 22
bttj jbtjbtbtbtbt OwnTDZTWGDAGDTDbt
ROA 3210
bttj jbtjbtbtbtbt OwnTDZTWGDAGDTDbt
ROA 11312110
Panel Data Analyses: FormulationsRelationship between banks’s risk and diversification measures is investigated by running the following regressions:
19.04.23 23
bttj jbtjbtbtbtbt OwnTDZTWGDAGDTDbt
NPL 3210
btbtbtbt ZTWGDAGDTDbt
NPL 1312110
bttbtbtj jbtj ROANPLOwnTD 111
19.04.23 24
Summary of Results
Diversification (sector means) Patterns vs. ROADiversification (sector means) Patterns vs. ROA
Diversification ComponentsDiversification Components
Diversification TrendsAll diversification measures are normalized with the ln (m), where m stands for number of loan type in the groups (they are different).When we compare them, we see that in years total (mean) sectoral diversification were raising.Income and product diversification have been falling in total terms.However we realize different patterns when we consider them w.r.t. their components. It is consistent with our assumption that components of diversification should also be taken into account in regressions.
19.04.23 27
19.04.23 28
Main Results
19.04.23 29
Diversification ComponentDiversification Component ROAROA RISKRISK
AGD – ProductAGD – Product N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD – ProductTWGD – Product N/Sig.N/Sig.
AGD (-1) – ProductAGD (-1) – Product N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD (-1) – ProductTWGD (-1) – Product N/Sig.N/Sig.
AGD – SectorAGD – Sector N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD – SectorTWGD – Sector N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
AGD (-1) – SectorAGD (-1) – Sector N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD (-1) – SectorTWGD (-1) – Sector N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
AGD – IncomeAGD – Income N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD – IncomeTWGD – Income N/Sig.N/Sig.
AGD (-1) – IncomeAGD (-1) – Income N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
TWGD (-1) – IncomeTWGD (-1) – Income N/Sig.N/Sig. N/Sig.N/Sig.
SUM
MARY of RESU
LTSSU
MM
ARY of RESULTS
Main Results -1n Results summarized in Table show that there is a
little evidence that diversification positively effects the returns and risks, increases ROA and reduces NPL. In total terms no significant effect is found. But when using its components some significant effects can be realized.
n For instance in total terms since there is no significant effect in total terms by means of product diversification; evidences are obtained in its components. However they are opposite. In terms of across groups diversification a negative effect on ROA is observed, while within group diversification has positive effects on ROA. This indicates that the total effect is neutralized.
19.04.23 30
Main Results -2n The evidence about income diversification effects found in this
study means that if a bank’s exposures are to the individual consumers rather than corporate clients and the bank changes her decision and shifts to the corporate banking it has negative affects the risk of loan losses,
n But if it stands in the retail (consumer) banking and diversify in terms of products and shows the benefit of measuring diversification in distinguished terms.
n This result is also in consistent with the previous studies asserting that noninterest revenues have more crucial role in bank management in a more competitive environment. Fees and commissions are the in the innovative instruments of return in the new era of banking.
19.04.23 31
Main Results -3n There is no substantial evidence about the effects
of sectoral diversification on performance. The only significant finding is that across group diversification reduces risk.
n It could be suggested that all sectors effected from economic conditions in a similar way.
n Therefore loan losses or returns gained from the sectors, especially within one group, are not differentiated. Only, if possible, across group diversification can give a benefit.
19.04.23 32
19.04.23 33
Conclusion
19.04.23 3434
Conclusion
In conclusion, the main results show that; there are In conclusion, the main results show that; there are only little evidences that diversification increases only little evidences that diversification increases
ROA and reduces NPL, however they are found with ROA and reduces NPL, however they are found with respect to the components of diversification respect to the components of diversification
measures. measures.
Therefore it is shown in this study that when Therefore it is shown in this study that when investigating the effects of diversification using investigating the effects of diversification using
different different dimensions of this factor is more beneficial dimensions of this factor is more beneficial than using only total measures.than using only total measures.
19.04.23 35
Thank You…Comments and Questions?