DRAW A LINE SEPARATING TODAY & YESTERDAY1) Write: Date: 09/14/10, Topic: 1st Amendment2) Next line, write “Opener #13” and then:

1) Write 1 high+1 low in last 24 hours2) Rate your understanding of yesterday: lost<1-5>too easy (3 is perfect)

3) Respond to the Opener by writing at least 1 sentences about:Your opinions/thoughts OR/AND

Questions sparked by the clip OR/AND

Summary of the clip OR/AND

Announcements: None

Agenda1) What are your 1st Amendment Rights

Primary Objective1) Learning how to defend your rights.

Reminder1) Find & complete your 4 news pods

Journal #13a, Title “Group Orientation”

1) Write down your team number.2) Write down your team name:(California, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Michigan, Kansas, Ohio, Florida)

3) Write down who is your group leader (re-elected each month)4) Copy everyone’s name, e-mail, and/or phone contact info.5) GOOGLE ACCOUNT (gmail or email account tied to a Google Act)

Review1) 1st Amendment: Congress shall

make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.

a) No gov religionb) No burdening religionc) No burdening speech,

press, assembly Berkeley Free Speech Movement

1st Amendment:“Congress shall

make no law…”If priv person

affects you, sue in civil case-tort

Notes #12a, Title: “1st Amendment Notes” 2) No Gov Religion: Lemon (v Kurtzman) Test: But

Law OK if: 1) secular (not trying to be religious), 2) not promoting, hurting religion, 3) not create excessive engagement

Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow

Aronow v. United States

Van Orden v. Perry

Notes #12b, Title: “1st Amendment Notes” 3) No Burdening Religion: If gov does interfere with a

sincere rel. belief, gov must pass strict scrutiny (“compelling state interest”, ppl hurt if gov no act)

Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah

Employment Division of OR v. Smith

Notes #13a, Title: “1st Amendment Notes”

1)Strict Scrutiny: No right is absolute, commonly used test to see if gov can take away your freedom.

3 parts:i) Compelling state

interest (harm if gov no act)

ii) Only way to do itiii) Done in least

invasive way

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Reynolds v. United States

Notes #13a, Title: “1st Amendment Notes” 2) No Burdening Speech: a) No prior restraint (NY Times v US)b) Content neutral, time place manner restrictions OKc) Any speech can be banned if strict scrutiny, com-

mercial speech less prot, inciting violence no prot

Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants

Association

Journal #13b, Title “Moot Court Prep”FILL-IN (a_) v. FILL-IN (r_) 1) Everyone outline in journal:CASE OUTLINEi) Greeting Statement (prescribed)ii) Issue Statementiii) Facts of the Case iv) Legal Arguments (3 bullets) SKIP: Possible Rebuttals

2) Write down your role, now script what you plan to say during the case (30 sec-1 min each), work as a team

1st AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of

religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.

ROLES 1a) Greeting Statement1b) Issue Statements

1c) Facts 2) Initial Arguments (2x if 5) 3) Rebuttals4) Closing Stmt (+spc ending)Judges special, see Chiang.

Oral Argument Structure 1) Greeting Statements (both sides come up) 2) Issue Statements (both sides come up) 3) Facts(both sides come up) 4) Initial Arguments (appellant first, respondent second) 5) Rebuttals (appellant first, respondent second) 6) Closing Statements(both sides come up)

Always start with your name!

Journal #13c, Title “1st Amendment Review”1st AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of

religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.

Oral Argument Structure 1) Greeting Statements (both sides come up) 2) Issue Statements (both sides come up) 3) Facts(both sides come up) 4) Initial Arguments (appellant first, respondent second) 5) Rebuttals (appellant first, respondent second) 6) Closing Statements(both sides come up)

1a) +:compliment, –:thing to improve, Your decision 1b) Case name + real outcome of the case.2…4b)

Webber v. FUHSD (Hypo): Facts:Webber bullied Jane on her Facebook wall, off site, school suspends Webber

CeCe v. FUHSD (Hypo): Facts:Teacher gets an anomonous tip that 4 students have been drinking on campus. Teacher decides to search 4 students cell phone for evidence, and finds a photo of them drinking in the restroom.

1b) Tinker v. DesMoines: Only speech that “materially & substantially interferes” with school can be restricted2b) Bethel School v. Fraser: Schools can censor lewd on campus speech3b) Hill v. Colorado: Buffer zone around abortion clinics if a fair tim, pl, man rest.4b) Webber v. FUHSD (Hypo): Off-campus must have a connection on specific a on-campus disruption for students to be held responsible.