Date post: | 11-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | anis-mcgee |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1©2007 Ball State University
Morning MessageUnderstanding: “The capacity to apply facts, concepts and skills in new situations in appropriate ways.”
-Dr. Howard Gardner
2©2007 Ball State University
Goals for EPIC Workshop 3
• Review Stages 1 & 2• Assess Stages 1 & 2 of your draft unit• Introduce Stage 3: Learning Plan • SmartDESKTOP: Resource Connection• Work Time
– rgrade– SmartDESKTOP– Curriculum
3©2007 Ball State University
Stages of EPIC:
Stage 1: Identify desired results (Workshop 1)
Stage 2: Develop assessments (Workshop 2)
Stage 3: Design learning plan (Workshop 3)
Stage 4: Analyze assessment evidence
Stage 5: Revise and disseminate curriculum
4©2007 Ball State University
Understanding in All Stages
Based on Wiggins and McTighe’s six facets of understanding toserve as recursive model in curriculum and assessmentdevelopment:
– Explanation– Interpretation– Application– Perspective– Empathy– Self-knowledge
5©2007 Ball State University
The EPIC Model
smartDESKTOPsmartDESKTOP
2. Develop 2. Develop AssessmentsAssessments
1. Identify 1. Identify Desired Desired ResultsResults
3. Design 3. Design Learning Learning
PlanPlan
5. Revise / 5. Revise / DisseminateDisseminate
4. Analyze 4. Analyze EvidenceEvidence
Six Facets of Six Facets of UnderstandingUnderstanding
At Least ONEAt Least ONECurricularCurricular
UnitUnit
Big IdeasBig Ideas
rGraderGrade
Implement Implement UnitUnit
6©2007 Ball State University
EPIC Model in Action
2. Develop Assessments
Six Facets of Six Facets of UnderstandingUnderstanding
1. Identify Desired Results
Big IdeasBig Ideas
4. Analyze Evidence
rGraderGrade
3. Design Learning
Plan
Implement Implement UnitUnit
5. Revise / Disseminate
smartDESKTOPsmartDESKTOP
Rubric DesignRubric Designand Standardsand Standards
OngoingOngoingCollaborationCollaboration
7©2007 Ball State University
3 Stages of Design
1. Identify desired results
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences & instruction
8©2007 Ball State University
The “big ideas” of each stage:
Assessment Evidence
Learning Activities
Understandings Essential Questions
stage
2
stage
3
Standard(s):
stage
1
Performance Task(s): Other Evidence:
Unpack the content standards and ‘content’, focus on big ideas
Analyze multiple sources of evidence, aligned with Stage 1
Derive the implied learning from Stages 1 & 2
What are the big ideas?
What’s the evidence?
How will we get there?
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
9©2007 Ball State University
Worth BeingFamiliar With
Clarifying Content Priorities
Important toKnow and Do
© 1998 Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
EnduringUnderstandings
10©2007 Ball State University
Worth BeingFamiliar With
Establishing Curricular Priorities and Assessment-Stage 2
Important toKnow and Do
© 1998 Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
EnduringUnderstandings
Traditional Quizzes and Tests
Performance Tasks and Projects
•Paper and pencil•Selected response•Constructed response
•Complex•Open-ended•Authentic
You’ve got to go below the surface...
12©2007 Ball State University
to uncover the really ‘big ideas.’
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
13©2007 Ball State University
3 Stages of Design
1. Identify desired results
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences & instruction
14©2007 Ball State University
Stage 1 – Identify desired results.
•Key: Focus on Big ideas– Enduring Understandings: What specific insights about big ideas
do we want students to leave with?
– What essential questions will frame the teaching and learning, pointing toward key issues and ideas, and suggest meaningful and provocative inquiry into content?
– What should students know and be able to do?
– What content standards are addressed explicitly by the unit?
U
K
Q
CS
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
15©2007 Ball State University
The “big idea” of Stage 1:
•There is a clear focus in the unit on the big ideas•Implications:– Organize content around key concepts– Show how the big ideas offer a purpose and rationale for
the student– You will need to “unpack” Content standards in many
cases to make the implied big ideas clear
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
16©2007 Ball State University
• An understanding is a “moral of the story” about the big ideas
– What specific insights will students take away about the the meaning of ‘content’
via big ideas? – Understandings summarize the desired
insights we want students to realize
From Big Ideas to Understandings about them U
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
17©2007 Ball State University
Understanding, defined: They are...
– Specific generalizations about the “big ideas.” They summarize the key meanings, inferences, and importance of the ‘content’
– deliberately framed as a full sentence “moral of the story” – “Students will understand THAT…”
– Require “uncoverage” because they are not “facts” to the novice, but unobvious inferences drawn from facts - counter-intuitive & easily misunderstood
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
18©2007 Ball State University
Knowledge vs. Understanding– An understanding is an unobvious and important
inference, needing “uncoverage” in the unit; knowledge is a set of established “facts”.
– Understandings make sense of facts, skills, and ideas: they tell us what our knowledge means; they ‘connect the dots’
– Any understandings are inherently fallible “theories”; knowledge consists of the accepted “facts” upon which a “theory” is based and the “facts” which a “theory” yields.
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
19©2007 Ball State University
Essential Questions• What questions –
– are arguable - and important to argue about? – are at the heart of the subject?– recur - and should recur - in professional work, adult
life, as well as in classroom inquiry? – raise more questions – provoking and sustaining
engaged inquiry?– often raise important conceptual or philosophical
issues?– can provide organizing purpose for meaningful &
connected learning?
Q
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
20©2007 Ball State University
1. Identify desired results
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences
& instruction
3 Stages of Design: Stage 2
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
21©2007 Ball State University
Thinking Like an AssessorPlace UbD Stage 2, determining acceptable evidence, before UbD Stage 3, planning teaching and learning activities
Build towards a “…preponderance of evidence to convict students of learning!” – What are key complex performance tasks indicative of
understanding?
– What other evidence will be collected to build the case for understanding, knowledge, and skill?
– What rubrics will be used to assess complex performance?
22©2007 Ball State University
3 Principles of Effective Assessment
1. Consider photo albums vs. snapshots. 2. Match the measures with the goals.
3. Form follows function.
23©2007 Ball State University
Reliability: Snapshot vs. Photo Album
• We need patterns that overcome inherent measurement error– Sound assessment (particularly of State Standards)
requires multiple evidence over time - a photo album vs. a single snapshot
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
24©2007 Ball State University
Performance Task Using GRASPS
(G) A real-world Goal(R) A meaningful Role for the student(A) Authentic real-world Audience(S) A contextualized Situation that involves real-world
application(P) Student-generated culminating Products and
Performances(S) Consensus -driven performance Standards
(criteria) for judging success
Photo Album:
25©2007 Ball State University
• What are you most proud of?• How does what you learned connect with
other learning?• How has what you learned connect to other
learning?• (refer to pages 79-80 in “Integrating” for
additional self-assessment questions)
Self-Assessment Photo Album:
26©2007 Ball State University
Principles of Effective Assessment
1. Consider photo albums vs. snapshots. 2. Match the measures with the goals.
3. Form follows function.
27©2007 Ball State University
1. What is the difference between knowing and understanding?
2. How will we know that students truly understand the big ideas that we have identified?
3. How might we allow students to demonstrate their understandings in diverse ways without
compromising standards?
Assessing UnderstandingMatch to Goals:
28©2007 Ball State University
1. Declarative Knowledge: What students should know and understand
• e.g. Vocabulary word match
2. Procedural Knowledge: What students should be able to do and understand
• e.g. Venn diagram
3. Dispositions: what attitudes or habits of mind students should display • e.g. Persuasive writing
3 Types of Educational GoalsMatch to Goals:
29©2007 Ball State University
1. Explain (write a letter to a friend back east)2. Interpret (open-mind portrait)3. Apply (create a museum exhibit)4. Perspective (debate)5. Empathy (simulated journal entries)6. Self-Knowledge (reflection on pioneer spirit)
Six Facets of UnderstandingMatch to Goals:
30©2007 Ball State University
3 Principles of Effective Assessment
1. Consider photo albums vs. snapshots. 2. Match the measures with the goals.
3. Form follows function.
31©2007 Ball State University
Form Follows Function
1. What are we assessing?
2. Why are we assessing?
3. For whom are the results intended?
4. How will the results be used?
32©2007 Ball State University
1. Assess Before Teaching (anticipation guide)
2. Offer Appropriate Choices (museum artifacts)
3. Provide Feedback Early and Often (duh)
4. Encourage Self-Assessment and Reflection (students respond to rubrics)
Classroom Assessment PracticesForm Follows Function:
33©2007 Ball State University
Assessment Technologies
• Providing teachers with tools to translate assessment goals into evidence gathering and analysis
• EPIC teachers are currently creating standards-based rubrics in BSU’s rGrade
• rGrade’s digital gradebook helps manage rubric-based, performance assessment in everyday practice
34©2007 Ball State University
Characteristics of the Best Learning Design p. 267
ExpectationsAssessmentInstructionLearning ActivitiesSequence and Coherence
35©2007 Ball State University
Expectations (Stage 1) • Provide clear learning goals and performance
expectations.• Cast learning goals in terms of genuine and
meaningful performance.• Frame the work around genuine questions
and meaningful challenges.• Show models and exemplars of expected
performance.
36©2007 Ball State University
Assessment (Stage 2) • There is no mystery as to performance goals
or standards.• Diagnostic assessments check for prior
knowledge, skill level, and misconceptions.• Students demonstrate their understanding
through real-world applications• Assessment methods are matched to
achievement targets.
37©2007 Ball State University
Assessment (Stage 2) Cont.
• Ongoing, timely feedback is provided.• Learners have opportunities for trial and
error, reflection and revision.• Self-assessment is expected.
38©2007 Ball State University
• Presentation of Westward Movement and Pioneer Life with Connections to Contemporary Times
http://www.bsu.edu/epic/units/0001-westward.pdf
39©2007 Ball State University
Assessing your Stages 1 & 2
Use EPIC Unit rubric (see handout)
40©2007 Ball State University
Discuss Stages 1 & 2 Drafts
41©2007 Ball State University
1. Identify desired results
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences
& instruction
3 Stages of Design: Stage 3
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
42©2007 Ball State University
Effective & Engaging Activity
43©2007 Ball State University
Stage 3 big idea:
EFFECTIVE
and
ENGAGING
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
44©2007 Ball State University
Stage 3 – Plan Learning Experiences & InstructionA focus on engaging and effective learning, “designed in”– What learning experiences and instruction will
promote the desired understanding, knowledge and skill of Stage 1?
– How will the design ensure that all students are maximally engaged and effective at meeting the goals?
L
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe
45©2007 Ball State University
4 Overarching Questions to Guide Curriculum Development1. Who are the students I will teach?2. What matters most for students to learn here (curriculum)?3. How must I teach to ensure that each student grows
systematically toward attainment of the goal and move beyond it when indicated (instruction)?
4. How will I know who is successful and who is not yet successful with particular goals (assessment)?
46©2007 Ball State University
1. Explain (write a letter to a friend back east)2. Interpret (open-mind portrait)3. Apply (create a museum exhibit)4. Perspective (debate)5. Empathy (simulated journal entries)6. Self-Knowledge (reflection on pioneer spirit)
Six Facets of Understanding
47©2007 Ball State University
Brainstorming Learning Activities Using the 6 Facets• Examples on pages 230-231
• Blank copy on page 232
48©2007 Ball State University
W.H.E.R.E.T.O. FrameworkW= Where are we headed?H=How will the students be hooked?E=What opportunities will there be to equip,
experience, and explore key issues? R=What will provide opportunities to rethink, rehearse,
refine and revise?E=How will students evaluate their work? T=How will the work be tailored to individual needs,
interests, styles?O=How will the work be organized for maximal
engagement and effectiveness?
49©2007 Ball State University
“Where are we headed?”
Introduce essential questions and key
vocabulary
1. What is pioneer spirit?
2. Why do people move?
3. What happens when cultures collide?
50©2007 Ball State University
How will the student be ‘hooked’?Read aloud Dandelions (Bunting) Quickwrite in learning log:
What does this book tell us about frontier life in the 1800’s? The
pioneer spirit? H
51©2007 Ball State University
What opportunities will there be to be equipped, and to experience and explore key ideas?Introduce the Larkin Family—Read aloud pp. 6-7 Daily Lifein a Covered Wagon ; Students choose the perspective ofeither Hiram (father); Hetty (mother); Rachel (14); Abraham(10); Rebecca (7); or Matthew Belknap 18 year old orphan Quickwrite in learning log: What do you think the journeywest will be like for you? ET
52©2007 Ball State University
What will provide opportunities to rethink, rehearse, refine and revise?
• Students prepare for debate choosing their perspective and developing their argument: Who were the winners and who were the losers in the settlement of the West. One side will argue that there are no losers; the opposing side will argue that the Native Americans were losers.
53©2007 Ball State University
How will students evaluate their work
• Student self-assessment and reflection• Peer-evaluate friendly letter to a friend
back East• Self-asses the museum display
54©2007 Ball State University
How will the work be tailored to individual needs, interests, styles?
Give booktalks on historical fiction books for guided reading; students rank order preference HT: – o The Ballad of Lucy Whipple (Cushman)– o Black-Eyed Susan (Armstrong)– o Prairie Songs (Conrad)– o Thunder Rolling in the Mountains (O’Dell)– o Moccasin Trail (McGraw)
55©2007 Ball State University
Indian Chiefs
Read aloud introduction pp3-9 to introduce collectedbiography of six Indianchiefs and how theyresponded to the WestwardExpansion; Quickwrite: What would you have done? H Students rank order theirpreference of chief. T
56©2007 Ball State University
Characteristics of the Best Learning Design p. 267
ExpectationsAssessmentInstructionLearning ActivitiesSequence and Coherence
57©2007 Ball State University
Instruction• The teacher serves as a facilitator or coach to
support the learner. • Targeted instruction and relevant resources are
provided to equip students for expected performance.
• The textbook serves as one resource among many.• The teacher “uncover” important ideas and
processes by exploring essential questions and genuine applications of knowledge and skills.
58©2007 Ball State University
Learning Activities
• Individual differences are accommodated through a variety of activities and methods.
• There is a variety in work methods and students have some choice.
• Learning is active and experiential to help students construct meaning.
• Cycles of model-try-feedback-refine anchor the learning.
59©2007 Ball State University
Sequence and Coherence• Start with a hook, and immerse the learner in
a genuine problem, issue, or challenge.• Move back and forth from whole to part, with
increasing complexity.• Scaffold learning in doable increments.• Teach as needed; don’t overteach all of the
basics first.• Revisit ideas; have learners rethink and
revise earlier ideas and work.• Be flexible!
60©2007 Ball State University
• Presentation of Westward Movement and Pioneer Life with Connections to Contemporary Times
http://www.bsu.edu/epic/units/0001-westward.pdf
61©2007 Ball State University
WHERETO ACTIVITY • Create a visual that will explain the letter and
share an idea for one of your units • W group use WB page 215-216 and 121-122• H group use WB page 217 and 122-123• E group use WB page 218-220 and 123-124• R group use WB page 221-222 and 124• E group use WB page 223 and 125• T group use WB page 224 and 125-126• O group use WB page 225 and126-127
62©2007 Ball State University
SmartDESKTOP
Resource ConnectionSee this link:http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
63©2007 Ball State University
IHC Showcase
• Monday April 30th from 4:00-7:00
• Directions to the Indiana Humanities Council
posted on EPIC website
64©2007 Ball State University
Unit Work Time – rgrade
– SmartDESKTOP
– Curriculum
65©2007 Ball State University
Closure 12:45: What’s NextReminders of tasks to complete:• Complete online evaluation of workshop 3• Post a draft of your entire unit by May 14th
on SmartDESKTOP’s Knowledge Base• Provide feedback to 2-3 peers by June 15
(we will match up peers)• Meet once in summer: Muncie (June) or
Indy(July)
66©2007 Ball State University
Fall 2007 Activities
– Teach your unit (finish by Oct. 15)• Keep Weekly Journal
• Collect student artifacts
• Assess performance task on rGrade
– Schedule Interviews/observations– Revise unit and email to EPIC (We’ll post on
smartDESKTOP.)– Complete in Post-survey– Participate in IHC Fall Showcase in early November