Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brianne-barnett |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
1
Balancing Security and Privacyin Times of Cyberterror
EDUCAUSE Western Regional ConferenceMay 8, 2007
Steve WoronaEDUCAUSE
2
The Internet ObeysOnly One Law
3
The Internet ObeysOnly One Law
The Law of
Unintended Consequences
4
or…
5
Be careful what you ask for…
6
…you might just get it
7
Example 1: A Story from the Dawn of (Internet) Time
It all started in 1995 with a simple question:
What’s the best resource for filtering out adult material for K-12 students?
• Net Nanny
• Cybersitter
• Surfwatch
• Cyber Patrol
• Etc.…
8
Example 2:A Poll on Campaign Finance
9
Example 2:A Poll on Campaign Finance
Proposition 1:Who are our political candidates taking money from? This should be public information.(Agree/Disagree?)
10
Example 2:A Poll on Campaign Finance
Proposition 1:Who are our political candidates taking money from? This should be public information.(Agree/Disagree?)
Proposition 2:What political candidates are you giving money to? This should be public information.(Agree/Disagree?)
11
www.fec.gov
12
Example 3:Do you want Privacy
or Privacy?
13
Example 3:Do you want Privacy
or Privacy?
Sorry, you can’t have both.
14
“You can’t have Privacywithout Security”
15
“You can’t have Privacywithout Security”
• Privacy: Ensuring that your personal information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands
16
“You can’t have Privacywithout Security”
• Privacy: Ensuring that your personal information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands• “VA Data Files on Millions of Veterans Stolen”• “Bank of America Loses A Million Customer Records”• “UCLA Warns 800,000 of Computer Break-In”
17
“You can’t have Privacywithout Security”
• Privacy: Ensuring that your personal information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands• “VA Data Files on Millions of Veterans Stolen”• “Bank of America Loses A Million Customer Records”• “UCLA Warns 800,000 of Computer Break-In”• HIPAA, FERPA, etc.• State and federal data-spill notification mandates
18
“You can’t have Privacywithout Security”
• Privacy: Ensuring that your personal information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands• “VA Data Files on Millions of Veterans Stolen”• “Bank of America Loses A Million Customer Records”• “UCLA Warns 800,000 of Computer Break-In”• HIPAA, FERPA, etc.• State and federal data-spill notification mandates
• Security: Limiting everyone’s activity to only the things they have a right to see and do• Who is trying to access data (“Authentication”)• Whether they have the right (“Authorization”)
19
So Whenever Anyone Does Anything Online,
We Want to Know…
20
So Whenever Anyone Does Anything Online,
We Want to Know…• Who they are
21
So Whenever Anyone Does Anything Online,
We Want to Know…• Who they are
• What they’re doing
22
So Whenever Anyone Does Anything Online,
We Want to Know…• Who they are
• What they’re doing
• Why they’re doing it
23
Identity Management Issues• Single sign-on
• With possible refresh for sensitive transactions
• Network sign-on• No access unless we know who you are• CALEA, RIAA
• Multi-factor authentication• Biometrics
• “Guest” authentication• Hotels; conferences; visitors
• Wireless authentication• Signal leakage
24
Another Definition of Privacy
• Privacy: The ability to go about your daily life without leaving a trail; the ability to read, speak, attend meetings, etc. anonymously
25
The Importance of Anonymity
“Anonymous pamphlets, leaflets, brochures and even books have played an important role in the progress of mankind. Persecuted groups and sects from time to time throughout history have been able to criticize oppressive practices and laws either anonymously or not at all.”
– Hugo Black, Talley v. California, 1960
26
Privacy1 vs Privacy2
• Privacy1: Ensuring that your personal information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands. (“Confidentiality”)
• Privacy2: The ability to go about your daily life without leaving a trail; the ability to read (speak, attend meetings, etc.) anonymously. (“Anonymity”)
27
The Dilemma
28
The Dilemma• We want to go through cyber-life without
leaving a trail
29
The Dilemma• We want to go through cyber-life without
leaving a trail• But we want everyone who comes in contact
with our data (and with us) to be identified and monitored
30
The Dilemma• We want to go through cyber-life without
leaving a trail• But we want everyone who comes in contact
with our data (and with us) to be identified and monitored• Spam• Phishing• Threats• Poison-pen postings• Baseless accusations• Etc…
31
The Dilemma• We want to go through cyber-life without leaving
a trail• But we want everyone who comes in contact with
our data (and with us) to be identified and monitored
Not Much Different Than• We want everyone to know who the
candidates are getting money from• But we don’t want anyone to know who we
are giving money to
32
Privacy Can Be Tricky:Consider Chat Rooms
• In general you have no legal “expectation of privacy” in a chat room because you don’t know who else is listening• You’re essentially speaking in public• You have no reason to believe a police officer
(on- or off-duty) isn’t present• US vs Charbonneau
33
Privacy Can Be Tricky:Consider Chat Rooms
• In general you have no legal “expectation of privacy” in a chat room because you don’t know who else is listening• You’re essentially speaking in public• You have no reason to believe a police officer
(on- or off-duty) isn’t present• US vs Charbonneau
• What are the limitations on government surveillance of chat rooms?
34
Privacy Can Be Tricky:Consider Chat Rooms
• In general you have no legal “expectation of privacy” in a chat room because you don’t know who else is listening• You’re essentially speaking in public• You have no reason to believe a police officer
(on- or off-duty) isn’t present• US vs Charbonneau
• What are the limitations on government surveillance of chat rooms?• Child molestors
35
Privacy Can Be Tricky:Consider Chat Rooms
• In general you have no legal “expectation of privacy” in a chat room because you don’t know who else is listening• You’re essentially speaking in public• You have no reason to believe a police officer
(on- or off-duty) isn’t present• US vs Charbonneau
• What are the limitations on government surveillance of chat rooms?• Child molestors• Dissident political groups
36
The Dilemma• We want to go through cyber-life without leaving
a trail• But we want everyone who comes in contact with
our data (and with us) to be identified and monitored
Not Much Different Than• We want everyone to know who the
candidates are getting money from• But we don’t want anyone to know who we
are giving money to
37
“Identified and Monitored”• “Government Plans Massive Data Sweep”
• “Feds Get Wide Wiretap Authority”
• “NSA Has Massive Database of Americans’ Phone Calls”
• “Finance-Monitoring Program Amounts to Spying”
• “Police Chief Wants Surveillance Cameras in Houston Apartments”
• “Big Brother Is Listening”
38
“Big Brother Is Listening”(Daily Telegraph (UK), May 2, 2007)
Hidden microphones that can eavesdrop on conversations in the street are the next step in the march towards a “Big Brother” society, MPs were warned yesterday.
Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, said a debate had begun about whether listening devices should be set up alongside Britain’s 4.5 million CCTV cameras.
In evidence to the Commons home affairs committee, Mr. Thomas said he would be hostile to such an idea.
He was also alarmed by the prospect of tiny cameras, hidden in lamp posts, replacing more obvious monitors.
He said it was arguable that surveillance in Britain - which is greater than in any other democratic nation - may already have gone too far.
39
Why Now?
40
Why Now?
• Because we can
41
Why Now?
• Because we can• Technology now makes it possible to collect,
maintain, and process everything you do• Moore’s Law is not being repealed• Brain = 1TB = $500 retail• Gordon Bell: MyLifeBits (10TB)• Library of Congress = 100TB• WORM drives• The Internet Archive• Ray Kurzweil: “The Singularity Is Near”
42
Why Now?
• Because we can• And so our only limitations are those we choose
to impose on ourselves
43
Why Now?
• Because we can
• Because we (think we) must
44
Why Now?
• Because we can
• Because we (think we) must• Why?
45
Why Now?
• Because we can
• Because we (think we) must• Because it makes law enforcement easier
46
Law Enforcement and Data
• Specific, focused, temporary• Tap, probe, monitor, investigate what’s needed
to deal with a particular crime or threat
47
The Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
48
Law Enforcement and Data
• Specific, focused, temporary• Tap, probe, monitor, investigate what’s needed
to deal with a particular crime or threat
• Just in case• Capture all possible information so that,
whenever something goes wrong, we can just play back the tape
49
Some “just in case” examples
• Toll-gate license-plate photos• No longer needed if the bell doesn’t ring• But very helpful if you want to get a list of possible
suspects for yesterday’s crime
• Metro cards• Paying for your trip• Who was where when?
• ATM cameras• If no robbery occurred, no need to retain• But might have caught a glimpse of a kidnapper
50
Déjà Vu?• “Homeland Security Monitored Students”
• “…surveillance by the Pentagon … database [of] … military protests and demonstrations at institutions of higher education …”
• “Although there does not appear to be any direct terrorist nexus to the event, a large gathering, especially on a college campus, may gain momentum and create public safety concerns. I do not see an issue of civil liberties being violated, rather proactive precautionary measures being taken by DHS and DoD.” – William H. Parrish, Assoc. Prof. of Homeland Security, VCU
51
Airport Security TomorrowAirport security chiefs and efficiency geeks will be able to keep
close tabs on airport passengers by tagging them with a high powered radio chip developed at the University of Central London. The technology is to be trialled in Debrecen Airport in Hungary after being in development for two-and-a-half years by University College London as part of an EU-funded consortium called Optag.
Dr Paul Brennan, of UCL’s antennas and radar group, said his team had developed a radio frequency identification tag far in advance of any that had been used to now to label supermarket produce.
People will be told to wear radio tags round their necks when they get to the airport. The tag would notify a computer system of their identity and whereabouts. The system would then track their activities in the airport using a network of high definition cameras.
– The Register (UK), Oct. 12, 2006
52
Network Authentication Today
• For every bit originating on our campus networks, we have the capability to know who put it there, when, and from where.
53
Network Authentication Today
• For every bit originating on our campus networks, we have the capability to know who put it there, when, and from where.
• Will we do it?
54
Network Authentication Today
• For every bit originating on our campus networks, we have the capability to know who put it there, when, and from where.
• Will we do it?
• Why?
55
Network Authentication Today
• For every bit originating on our campus networks, we have the capability to know who put it there, when, and from where.
• Will we do it?
• Why?
• Who should be involved in the decision?
56
The Dilemma in Other Words…
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
– Benjamin Franklin (1755)
57
The Dilemma in Other Words…
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin (1755)
“While the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact.”
– Arthur Goldberg (1963)
58
“The Constitution Is Nota Suicide Pact”
59
“The Constitution Is Nota Suicide Pact”
60
Or…
“Give me Liberty or give me Death!”– Patrick Henry
(Delegate, Virginia, 1775)
61
Or…
“Give me Liberty or give me Death!”– Patrick Henry
(Delegate, Virginia, 1775)
“You have no civil liberties if you’re dead!”– Patrick Roberts
(Senator, Kansas, 2006)
62
“The Eternal Value of Privacy”(Bruce Schneier)
The most common retort against privacy advocates is this line: “If you aren’t doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?”
Some clever answers: “If I’m not doing anything wrong, then you have no cause to watch me.” “Because the government gets to define what’s wrong, and they keep changing the definition.” “Because you might do something wrong with my information.”
My problem with quips like these – as right as they are – is that they accept the premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong. It’s not. Privacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect.
Cardinal Richelieu understood the value of surveillance when he famously said, “If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged.” Watch someone long enough, and you’ll find something to arrest – or just blackmail – with.
Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we’re doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.
We do nothing wrong when we make love or go to the bathroom. We are not deliberately hiding anything when we seek out private places for reflection or conversation. We keep private journals, sing in the privacy of the shower, and write letters to secret lovers and then burn them. Privacy is a basic human need.
63
The Privacy/Security Rorschach
64
The Privacy/Security Rorschach
“Law enforcement is not supposed to be easy.
Where it is easy, it’s called a police state.”
– Jeff Schiller, in Wired (1999)
65
End
66
Authentication Mechanisms
• Accounts and passwords
• ATM cards and PINs
• Smart cards
• Challenge/response systems
• Digital certificates
• Key-fob tokens
• Biometrics
• Etc…