+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book...

1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book...

Date post: 19-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: emory-lawson
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
1 Chapter 4 Part II
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

1

Chapter 4

Part II

Page 2: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

2

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book

PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and necessary medical bills

Plaintiffs wanted them paid up front, employers wanted them to prove the necessity and reasonableness first

Plaintiffs say this is a termination of benefits and they want due process

Court says they were not yet qualified and must prove eligibility

Page 3: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

3

LA Law Note - Title 49, Chapter 13, §961. Licenses

C. No revocation, suspension, annulment, or withdrawal of any license is lawful unless, prior to the institution of agency proceedings, the agency gives notice by mail to the licensee of facts or conduct which warrant the intended action, and the licensee is given an opportunity to show compliance with all lawful requirements for the retention of the license. If the agency finds that public health, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, and incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary suspension of a license may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or other action. These proceedings shall be promptly instituted and determined.

Page 4: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

4

Liberty Interests

What is a liberty interest? What are examples? How is a liberty interest like a property interest? What is the taking analog for liberty interests?

Page 5: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

5

Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433 (1971)

A state law required the posting of the names of “public drunkards” at places where alcoholic beverages Did Paul concede that he was a drunkard? What were the provisions for challenging being

on the list? What did the United States Supreme Court hold?

Page 6: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

6

Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976)

The sheriff gave out a list of "active shoplifters," including persons who had not been convicted

How did the court distinguish Constantineau? How was the effect on the plaintiff different in this

case? What did Justice Brennan say this would allow the states

to do?

Page 7: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

7

Public Child Abuse Registries

Valmonte v. Bane, 18 F.3d 992 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) 1994) Plaintiff was put on the child abuse register

because of a complaint Employers were required to check this list Court found that this deserved a hearing

Page 8: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

8

Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226 (1991)

Defamatory job recommendations from Government employer

Not a constitutional violation Why not? What was plaintiff's remedy?

Page 9: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

9

Discussion Question

Law student Melissa was charged with plagiarism but was not provided any due process protections.

Fearful of a lawsuit, the law school did not expel her, but upon her graduation it sent a letter to the State Board of Bar Examiners informing the Board that Melissa had “engaged in plagiarism in Legal Writing during her first year.”

Have her due process rights been violated?

Page 10: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

10

Round Two

In this case, the school expels her and puts an entry on her transcript that she “engaged in plagiarism in Legal Writing during her first year.”

Has Melissa been deprived of liberty by the damage to her reputation?

Is a note on the transcript equal to publication? What does publication matter?

Page 11: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

11

Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624 (1977)

There a police department fired a probationary policeman because he had apparently threatened suicide using his service revolver. Because he was a probationary employee, he had no property interest in continued employment, but he claimed that the inclusion of this allegation in his personnel file damaged his reputation and made it impossible for him to find other employment as a policeman.

What did the Appeals Court find? Does this resolve Melissa's case?

Page 12: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

12

Perverts R/US WWW Sites

Privacy loses to security United States Supreme Court recently ruled that persons

convicted of even minor sex related crimes, such as public indecency as teenagers, could be put on a state WWW site without a hearing. Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 123 S.Ct.

1160, 71 USLW 4125, 71 USLW 4158 (2003) Smith v. Doe, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 71 USLW 4182 (2003)

Claimed this was police power prevention, not punishment

When did the plaintiff get due process?

Page 13: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

13

“Liberty” - The Prison Equivalent to New Property

Key question - what rights does a prisoner retain? Constant Problem in LA

Angola Juvenile justice made the international press

Decent prisons cost more money to run, so the state has an interest in getting out of these cases without really changing things for the long term.

Lots of room for graft as well

Page 14: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

14

42 USC 1983

State prison cases are mostly filed under 42 USC 1983, alleging that the state deprived them of their civil rights.

Due process claims, such as Sandin "Cruel and unusual punishment claims" which

generally deal with conditions of confinement or medical care.

Page 15: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

15

Due Process Claims

Due process claims require the plaintiff to show that he had a liberty interest in the proceeding.

Even if the court finds a liberty interest, that just lets the prisoner into court.

Page 16: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

16

Sandin v Conner 1995

Prisoner got 30 days in solitary as punishment. Is this cruel and unusual? Is he entitled to a hearing?

Only when discipline "imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life" is due process implicated.

The Court rejected a claim that punishment of solitary confinement for 30 days was enough to trigger due process requirements.

Page 17: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

17

Wilkinson v. Austin, 125 S.Ct. 2384 (2005)

The Court concluded that indefinite placement in a "supermax" prison together with a disqualification from parole was enough to trigger due process requirements.

Does a hearing before the prison officials really mean much?

Page 18: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

18

Good Time Credits

Are these constitutionally required? Why have them? Do they affect the length of time served? If so, they may trigger due process

Page 19: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

19

What rights does a prisoner retain?

Some freedom to exercise religion Some limited right to communicate with the

outside A little bit of free speech Some bodily integrity, at least in the area of

medical care Freedom from beatings and the like through 1983

and state laws.

Page 20: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

20

Trade-offs in Prison Regulations

Assume you have been hired to develop a new set of prison regulations for Angola.

What are the tradeoffs you must deal with? What happens if prisoners have lots of rights? What if prisoners have no rights?

Page 21: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

21

How Can Prisoners Enforce their Rights?

Should jailhouse lawyers get special (positive) treatment in court?

How much latitude should outside lawyers have in asserting rights for prisoners?

Should there be different rules for juvenile prisons? Who decides about representation for kids if

the parents are not fit? What about medical decisions for them?

Page 22: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

22

Social Security DisabilityBasic Procedure drill - I

Get a form the Social Security office What is the illness, the work history, the doc? SSI orders records A doc at SSI at Disability Determination Service - run by

state as contractor - makes a determination Sends to regional office Regional office pays, QA, or denies Ask for reconsideration This is all done with records

Page 23: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

23

Social Security DisabilityBasic Procedure drill - II

At the state level, the examiner can call the patient's doc At the fed level, the expert is bound by the patient's doc Most problems arise because of poor documentation Applicants can submit new info and get a new evaluation After denial, you can ask for a hearing before ALJ At the hearing stage, you ask for an expedited review if

the case is clear ALJ's decision is final At this point you can appeal to the federal courts

Page 24: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

24

Volume of Claims

How many claims does SSA decide every year? How big is the disability system (SSD)? Why is this important background for Matthews v.

Eldridge

Page 25: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

25

Matthews v. Eldridge (1976)

Why does SSD require periodic review of benefits?

When does SSD provide a hearing? What if the claimant is successful at the hearing? How long can this take? Why does the Court find this is less critical than

in Goldberg?

Page 26: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

26

What does plaintiff want?

What data is used for making disability determinations? Who would be the witnesses and how is their information

collected? Does the claimant's testimony matter? How does this change the equities of Goldberg? Why is the administrative decisionmaker less prone to

make errors in this case than in Goldberg?

Page 27: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

27

Cost Benefit Analysis

What are the Mathews factors? C = P x V Cost = Probability of increased accuracy

versus Value of the benefit How would you apply these factors to Matthews? Does plaintiff get his pre-termination hearing? What about other administrative decisions?

Page 28: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

28

Limitations on Hearings

Page 29: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

29

De minimis Test

Some deprivations are too insignificant to trigger a right to a hearing

Putting a cop on paid sick leave did not trigger due process

Otherwise the courts will be in every employment action

We will see this again with 1983 actions

Page 30: 1 Chapter 4 Part II. 2 American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sullivan (1999) - Not in book PA Comp law require employers to pay reasonable and.

30

Alternative Remedies

Due process is not the only remedy for many actions Contracts with the government are not property but

are agreements governed by contract law. Unger v. National Residents Matching Program

Failing to admit resident after signing the match contract did not trigger a hearing, but would support a breach of contract action.

Does you client really need a hearing, or do you have a contract action?

Which is better?


Recommended