+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8%...

1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8%...

Date post: 30-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
1 CITY OF BOSTON Presented by: CITY OF BOSTON Boston Transportation Department Tetra Tech The Cecil Group Brown Richardson & Rowe Jacobs Engineering Group Presented by: CITY OF BOSTON Boston Transportation Department Tetra Tech The Cecil Group Brown Richardson & Rowe Jacobs Engineering Group www.cityofboston.gov/transportation/rutherford/ Community Meeting December 6, 2012 Community Meeting December 6, 2012
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

1

CITY OF BOSTON

Presented by:

CITY OF BOSTONBoston Transportation Department

Tetra TechThe Cecil GroupBrown Richardson & RoweJacobs Engineering Group

Presented by:

CITY OF BOSTONBoston Transportation Department

Tetra TechThe Cecil GroupBrown Richardson & RoweJacobs Engineering Group

www.cityofboston.gov/transportation/rutherford/

Community MeetingDecember 6, 2012Community MeetingDecember 6, 2012

Page 2: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

2

CITY OF BOSTON

Existing Conditions

Major Issues

Proposed OptionsUnderpass Option

Surface Option

Existing Conditions

Major Issues

Proposed OptionsUnderpass Option

Surface Option

Austin Street AreaMeeting AgendaAustin Street AreaMeeting Agenda

Page 3: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

3

CITY OF BOSTON

Improve pedestrian connections/ safety

Decrease traffic congestion

Protect Main Street from cut-through traffic

Create public/open space

Provide opportunities for appropriate development

Provide bicycle connections

Increase on-street parking

Improve pedestrian connections/ safety

Decrease traffic congestion

Protect Main Street from cut-through traffic

Create public/open space

Provide opportunities for appropriate development

Provide bicycle connections

Increase on-street parking

Rutherford Avenue – Neighborhood GoalsRutherford Avenue – Neighborhood Goals

Page 4: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

4

CITY OF BOSTON

29402615

1875

21951960

2150

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

AM Peak PM Peak

Rutherford Ave. traffic volume comparison -Austin Street Underpass Rutherford Ave. traffic volume comparison -Austin Street Underpass

1997 2008 2011 1997 2008 2011

Page 5: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

5

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street -Existing GeometryAustin Street -Existing Geometry

Page 6: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

6

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street –Existing AMPeak HourVolumes

Austin Street –Existing AMPeak HourVolumes

300231279

70 31

21224103

4724224

1445

Page 7: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

7

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street –Existing PMPeak HourVolumes

Austin Street –Existing PMPeak HourVolumes

745336554

122

53

38182101

1155898

1600

Page 8: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

8

CITY OF BOSTON

2. Pedestrian “unfriendly” environment – 3 separate Ped crossings from neighborhood to MBTA Station.

1. High volume of traffic turning left from Gilmore Bridge to Rutherford Ave. NB

31%

Austin Street –Existing IssuesAustin Street –Existing Issues

Page 9: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

9

CITY OF BOSTON

1. Underpass Option

2. Surface Option

1. Underpass Option

2. Surface Option

Austin Street Improvement OptionsAustin Street Improvement Options

Page 10: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

10

CITY OF BOSTON

Provides 22 foot wide buffer including open space & multiuse path

Improves pedestrian safety

Adequate capacity for future traffic

Creates generous pedestrian island

Provides 22 foot wide buffer including open space & multiuse path

Improves pedestrian safety

Adequate capacity for future traffic

Creates generous pedestrian island

Austin Street UnderpassConcept DesignAustin Street UnderpassConcept Design

Page 11: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

11

CITY OF BOSTON

22 foot wide open space with multi-use pathNo on-street parking within 1,000’ area

22 foot wide open space with multi-use pathNo on-street parking within 1,000’ area

Austin StreetUnderpassConcept Design

Austin StreetUnderpassConcept Design

Page 12: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

12

CITY OF BOSTON

Reduce pedestrian crossings from 3 to 2

Reduce pedestrian crossing distance from 210 feet to 140 feet (185 feet if right turn lane is required)

Reduce pedestrian crossings from 3 to 2

Reduce pedestrian crossing distance from 210 feet to 140 feet (185 feet if right turn lane is required)

210’

Austin Street UnderpassConcept DesignAustin Street UnderpassConcept Design

Page 13: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

13

CITY OF BOSTON

Reduces width of Rutherford Avenue underpass:

6 lanes to 4 lanes

3 lanes per direction to 2 lanes per direction

Note: Underpass traffic demands = 1 lane, 2nd lane is required for safety purposes

Reduces width of Rutherford Avenue underpass:

6 lanes to 4 lanes

3 lanes per direction to 2 lanes per direction

Note: Underpass traffic demands = 1 lane, 2nd lane is required for safety purposes

Austin Street UnderpassConcept DesignAustin Street UnderpassConcept Design

Page 14: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

14

CITY OF BOSTON

Provides 50 foot wide buffer that includes open space, multiuse path and on-street parking lane

Improves pedestrian safety

Reduces highway-like feel and underpass noise

Adequate capacity for future traffic

Provides 50 foot wide buffer that includes open space, multiuse path and on-street parking lane

Improves pedestrian safety

Reduces highway-like feel and underpass noise

Adequate capacity for future traffic

Austin Street SurfaceOption Concept DesignAustin Street SurfaceOption Concept Design

Page 15: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

15

CITY OF BOSTON

Provides an approximate 50 foot buffer with open space, multiuse path and an on-street parking lane

Provides an approximate 50 foot buffer with open space, multiuse path and an on-street parking lane

Austin Street –Surface OptionAustin Street –Surface Option

South Bay Harbor Trail, Melnea Cass Blvd. Source: Masspaths.org

Page 16: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

16

CITY OF BOSTON

90’

210’Reduce pedestrian crossings from 3 to 2

Reduce crossing distance from 210 feet to 90 feet

Reduce pedestrian crossings from 3 to 2

Reduce crossing distance from 210 feet to 90 feet

Austin Street –Surface OptionAustin Street –Surface Option

Page 17: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

17

CITY OF BOSTON

2 left turn lanes from Gilmore Bridge

Total of 13 traffic lanes will be provided

2 left turn lanes from Gilmore Bridge

Total of 13 traffic lanes will be provided

Austin Street –Surface OptionAustin Street –Surface Option

Page 18: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

18

CITY OF BOSTON

2008 Traffic Counts (similar to 2011)Increase by 5% to account for regional growth and redevelopment in the Rutherford Avenue corridorAdd in traffic from Assembly Square Project in Somerville

2008 Traffic Counts (similar to 2011)Increase by 5% to account for regional growth and redevelopment in the Rutherford Avenue corridorAdd in traffic from Assembly Square Project in Somerville

2030 Traffic Projections2030 Traffic Projections

Page 19: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

19

CITY OF BOSTON

Future 2030 AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic VolumesFuture 2030 AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Austin Street Underpass Concept DesignAustin Street Underpass Concept Design

Note: Capacity of 1 thru lane = approx. 1,000 vehicles/hour

Page 20: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

20

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street Surface Option Concept DesignAustin Street Surface Option Concept Design

Future 2030 AM (PM)Peak Hour Traffic VolumesFuture 2030 AM (PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Note: Capacity of 1 thru lane = approx. 1,000 vehicles/hour

Page 21: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

21

CITY OF BOSTON

Comparison of Signal Times –Austin Street ApproachComparison of Signal Times –Austin Street Approach

Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourExisting • 29 of 105 seconds (27%)

• 22% of traffic volume• 29 of 105 seconds (27%)• 13% of traffic volume

Underpass Option • 32 of 120 seconds (26%)• 14% of traffic volume

• 30 of 120 seconds (25%)• 11% of traffic volume

Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%)• 8% of traffic volume

• 24 of 120 seconds (20%)• 6% of traffic volume

Note: To accommodate all traffic movements, existing signal is programmed to complete cycle in 105 seconds. Future cycle for both design options = 120 seconds. Note: To accommodate all traffic movements, existing signal is programmed to complete cycle in 105 seconds. Future cycle for both design options = 120 seconds.

Page 22: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

22

CITY OF BOSTON

Baldwin Street

Essex Street

BHCC

Baldwin Street

Essex Street

BHCC

Proposed Cross-Corridor connectionsProposed Cross-Corridor connections

Essex St

BHCC

Page 23: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

23

CITY OF BOSTON

Traffic Signal SystemsTraffic Signal Systems

Queue detection and video monitoring at signals

All signals in corridor coordinated in a system linked to BTD Management Center

Traffic Progression along boulevard –maximizes “through-put”; discourages diversions

Real-time signal timing adjustments to respond to changes in demand (e.g., traffic related to events at TD Bank Garden)

Queue detection and video monitoring at signals

All signals in corridor coordinated in a system linked to BTD Management Center

Traffic Progression along boulevard –maximizes “through-put”; discourages diversions

Real-time signal timing adjustments to respond to changes in demand (e.g., traffic related to events at TD Bank Garden)

Page 24: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

24

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street – Comparison of OptionsAustin Street – Comparison of OptionsSurface OptionSurface Option Underpass OptionUnderpass Option

Page 25: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

25

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street – Comparison of OptionsAustin Street – Comparison of OptionsUnderpass OptionUnderpass Option Surface OptionSurface Option

Surface Option Existing Underpass Option

Page 26: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

26

CITY OF BOSTON

Austin Street – Comparison of OptionsAustin Street – Comparison of Options

Surface Option Existing Underpass Option

Page 27: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

27

CITY OF BOSTON

Option Comparison Based on Response to GoalsOption Comparison Based on Response to Goals

GOALS SURFACE OPTION UNDERPASS OPTIONPedestrianConnections

• Improved pedestrian connections• Crossing distance reduced to 90 ft.

• Improved pedestrian connections• Crossing distance reduced to 140 ft.

Traffic Congestion • Adequate capacity at intersection• Design provides flexibility for future

volumes

• Adequate capacity at intersection• Underpass separates out north – south

through trafficOpen Space • Provides 50 ft. wide buffer with open

space and on-street parking adjacent to neighborhood

• Provides 22 ft. buffer with adjacent to neighborhood

Main Street • Signals will be timed to prevent cut-through traffic on Main and Austin

• Signals will be timed to prevent cut-through traffic on Main and Austin

Bicycle connections • 10 ft. multiuse path on east side• 5 ft. bike lane on Rutherford Ave. SB

• 10 ft. multiuse path on east side• Bicycle accommodations SB TBD

On-Street Parking • Rutherford Ave (Austin St. area): 130 • Rutherford Ave (Austin St. area): 15

Page 28: 1 Community Meeting - Boston · 2016. 7. 11. · Surface Option • 26 of 120 seconds (22%) • 8% of traffic volume • 24 of 120 seconds (20%) • 6% of traffic volume Note: To

28

CITY OF BOSTON

www.cityofboston.gov/transportation/rutherford/

Community MeetingDecember 6, 2012Community MeetingDecember 6, 2012

DiscussionDiscussion


Recommended