+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1...

1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1...

Date post: 28-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 13 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example Follow up to “Decomposition Methods in Economics by Nicole Fortin, Thomas Lemieux, and Sergio Firpo in the recent Handbook of Labor Economics (Volume 4A, 2011) 1.1 Oaxaca-Blinder and the Gender Pay Gap Case featured in O’Neill and O’Neill (2006)“What Do Wage Differen- tials Tell Us about Labor Market Discrimination?’ NBER WP11240, published in The Economics of Immigration and Social Policy, edited by S. Polachek, C.Chiswich, and H. Rapoport. Research in Labor Economics 24:293-357.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example

• Follow up to “Decomposition Methods in Economics by Nicole Fortin,

Thomas Lemieux, and Sergio Firpo in the recent Handbook of Labor

Economics (Volume 4A, 2011)

1.1 Oaxaca-Blinder and the Gender Pay Gap

• Case featured in O’Neill and O’Neill (2006)“What Do Wage Differen-

tials Tell Us about Labor Market Discrimination?’ NBER WP11240,

published in The Economics of Immigration and Social Policy, edited

by S. Polachek, C.Chiswich, and H. Rapoport. Research in Labor

Economics 24:293-357.

Page 2: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

• Use 2000 wage data from the NLSY79 when the cohort was 35-43

years of age.

• The NLSY being a longitudinal survey has actual labor market expe-

rience and a AFQT score.

• The sample is restricted to civilian wage and salary workers, thereby

omitting self-employed workers.

• The wage rates are the hourly wage as reported directly by those paid

by the hour. For those who are paid on another basis –day, week,

month, usual weekly earnings are divided by usual weekly hours.

Page 3: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

1.2 Know the distribution of interest

• Plotting the density of wage by gender or the gender differential byquantile illustrates potential issues of economic interest

. *** use vkdensity to check bandwidth ;

. foreach aut in silver scott hardle {;2. vkdensity lropc00 if female==0, epan ‘aut’;3. vkdensity lropc00 if female==1, epan ‘aut’;4. };

bandwidth choice (Silverman)= .09915983bandwidth choice (Silverman)= .09591583bandwidth choice (Scott)= .12950542bandwidth choice (Scott)= .12191967bandwidth choice (Hardle)= .11678825bandwidth choice (Hardle)= .11296753

. kdensity lropc00 if female==0, gen(evalm1 densm1) width(0.10) nograph ;

Page 4: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

. kdensity lropc00 if female==1, gen(evalf1 densf1) width(0.10) nograph ;

. graph twoway (histogram lropc00 if female==1, bin(50) lcolor(erose)> fi(inten80) fcolor(erose) ) (histogram lropc00 if female==0, bin(50)> lcolor(eltblue) fi(inten80) fcolor(eltblue) ) (connected densf1 evalf1,> m(i) lp(dash) lw(medium) lc(red) ) (connected densm1 evalm1, m(i)> lp(longdash) lw(medium) lc(blue) ) , ytitle("Density")> ylabel(0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8) xlabel(1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5)> xtitle("Log(wage)") legend(ring(0) pos(2) col(1) lab(1 "Women")> lab(2 "Men") lab(3 " ") lab(4 " ") order(1 3 2 4) region(lstyle(none))> symxsize(8) keygap(1) textwidth(25) ) saving(nlsy00_dens,replace)

. graph export nlysy00_dens.eps, replace(file nlysy00_dens.eps written in EPS format)

Page 5: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

0.2

.4

.6

.8

Density

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5Log(wage)

Women

Men

Figure 1: Densities of Male and Female Wages

. pctile evalf2=lropc00 if female==1 , nq(100) ;

. pctile evalm2=lropc00 if female==0 , nq(100) ;

. gen qdiff=evalm2-evalf2 if _n<100;

Page 6: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

(5210 missing values generated)

. gen qtau=_n/100 if _n<100;

graph twoway (line qdiff qtau if qtau>0.0 & qtau<1.0, connect(l)> m(i) lw(medium) lc(black) ) , yline(.2333003, lpattern(solid) lcolor(red))> yline(.2046703 .2619303, lpattern(dash) lcolor(erose) )> xlabel(0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0) ylabel(0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4)> xtitle("Quantile") ytitle("Log Wage Differential")> saving(nlsy00_qplot,replace) ;

Page 7: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

0.1

.2

.3

.4

Log Wage Differential

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Quantile

Figure 2: Gender Differential by Quantile

• Essentially in the NLSY 2000, gender wage differentials hoover within

standard errors of the average differential of 0.233 (0.015) in the entire

(15-85) interquartile range

Page 8: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

• This is not the case among high paid executives from the Execucomp

Database! (extending Bertrand and Hallock, 2001)

0.1

.2

.3

.4

Differential in Log Total Compensation

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Quantile

Raw GapMean Gap

Figure 3: Gender Differential in Log Total Compensation by Quantile

Page 9: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

Explanatory VariablesFemale 0 1 -0.092 ( 0.014)Education and skill level <10 yrs. 0.053 0.032 -0.027 ( 0.043) -0.089 ( 0.05) -0.027 ( 0.043) -0.045 ( 0.033) 10-12 yrs (no diploma or GED) 0.124 0.104 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HS grad (diploma) 0.326 0.298 -0.013 ( 0.028) -0.002 ( 0.029) -0.013 ( 0.028) -0.003 ( 0.02) HS grad (GED) 0.056 0.045 0.032 ( 0.042) -0.012 ( 0.044) 0.032 ( 0.042) 0.006 ( 0.03) Some college 0.231 0.307 0.164 ( 0.031) 0.101 ( 0.03) 0.164 ( 0.031) 0.131 ( 0.022) BA or equiv. degree 0.155 0.153 0.380 ( 0.037) 0.282 ( 0.036) 0.380 ( 0.037) 0.330 ( 0.026) MA or equiv. degree 0.041 0.054 0.575 ( 0.052) 0.399 ( 0.046) 0.575 ( 0.052) 0.468 ( 0.034) Ph.D or prof. Degree 0.015 0.007 0.862 ( 0.077) 0.763 ( 0.1) 0.862 ( 0.077) 0.807 ( 0.06) AFQT percentile score (x.10) 4.231 3.971 0.042 ( 0.004) 0.041 ( 0.004) 0.042 ( 0.004) 0.042 ( 0.003)L.F. withdrawal due to family resp. 0.129 0.547 -0.078 ( 0.025) -0.083 ( 0.019) -0.078 ( 0.025) -0.067 ( 0.015)Lifetime Work Experience Years worked civilian 17.160 15.559 0.038 ( 0.003) 0.030 ( 0.002) 0.038 ( 0.003) 0.033 ( 0.002) Years worked military 0.578 0.060 0.024 ( 0.005) 0.042 ( 0.013) 0.024 ( 0.005) 0.021 ( 0.004) % worked part-time 0.049 0.135 -0.749 ( 0.099) -0.197 ( 0.049) -0.749 ( 0.099) -0.346 ( 0.044)Industrial Sectors Primary, Constr. & Utilities 0.186 0.087 --- --- --- --- 0.059 ( 0.031) --- --- Manufacturing 0.237 0.120 0.034 ( 0.026) 0.140 ( 0.035) 0.093 ( 0.029) 0.072 ( 0.021) Education, Health, & Public Adm. 0.130 0.358 -0.059 ( 0.031) 0.065 ( 0.03) --- --- -0.001 ( 0.02) Other Services 0.447 0.436 0.007 ( 0.024) 0.088 ( 0.029) 0.066 ( 0.026) 0.036 ( 0.018)Constant 2.993 ( 0.156) 2.865 ( 0.144) 2.934 ( 0.157) 2.949 ( 0.105)

Dependent Var. (Log Hourly Wage) 2.763 2.529Adj. R-Square 0.422 0.407 0.422 0.431Sample size 2655 2654

Means Female Coef.Male Coef. Male Coef

Table 2. Means and OLS Regression Coefficients of Selected Variables from NLSY Log Wage Regressions for Workers Ages 35-43 in 2000

Pooled Coef

Note: The data is an extract from the NLSY79 used in O'Neill and O'Neill (2006). Industrial sectors were added (at a lost of 89 observations) to their analysis to illustrate issues linked to categorical variables. The other explanatory variables are age, dummies for black, hispanic, region, msa, central city. Standard errors are in parentheses.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Page 10: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

1.3 Gender Wage Gap and Female Dummy

• What’s wrong with the sequential introduction of explanatory vari-

ables?

• It depends on the order of the “decomposition”

• Let’s see “part-time” work example

Page 11: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

Explanatory VariablesFemale -0.233 ( 0.015) -0.209 ( 0.015) -0.113 ( 0.014) -0.092 ( 0.014)"Explained by % worked part-time" -0.025 -0.021Education and skill level <10 yrs. --- --- --- --- -0.092 ( 0.014) -0.045 ( 0.033) 10-12 yrs (no diploma or GED) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HS grad (diploma) --- --- --- --- -0.092 ( 0.014) -0.003 ( 0.02) HS grad (GED) --- --- --- --- -0.012 ( 0.044) 0.006 ( 0.03) Some college --- --- --- --- 0.101 ( 0.03) 0.131 ( 0.022) BA or equiv. degree --- --- --- --- 0.282 ( 0.036) 0.330 ( 0.026) MA or equiv. degree --- --- --- --- 0.399 ( 0.046) 0.468 ( 0.034) Ph.D or prof. Degree --- --- --- --- 0.763 ( 0.1) 0.807 ( 0.06) AFQT percentile score (x.10) --- --- --- --- 0.041 ( 0.004) 0.042 ( 0.003)L.F. withdrawal due to family resp. --- --- --- --- -0.083 ( 0.019) -0.067 ( 0.015)Lifetime Work Experience Years worked civilian --- --- --- --- 0.033 ( 0.002) 0.033 ( 0.002) Years worked military --- --- --- --- 0.021 ( 0.004) 0.021 ( 0.004) % worked part-time --- --- -0.288 ( 0.055) --- --- -0.346 ( 0.044)Industrial Sectors Primary, Constr. & Utilities --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Manufacturing --- --- --- --- 0.084 ( 0.021) 0.072 ( 0.021) Education, Health, & Public Adm. --- --- --- --- 0.008 ( 0.021) -0.001 ( 0.02) Other Services --- --- --- --- 0.038 ( 0.018) 0.036 ( 0.018)Constant 2.763 ( 0.01) 2.777 ( 0.011) 2.955 ( 0.106) 2.949 ( 0.105)

Adj. R-Square 0.046 0.051 0.422 0.431Sample size 2655 2654

Pooled Coef Pooled Coef Pooled Coef Pooled Coef

Note: The data is an extract from the NLSY79 used in O'Neill and O'Neill (2006). Industrial sectors were added (at a lost of 89 observations) to their analysis to illustrate issues linked to categorical variables. The other explanatory variables are age, dummies for black, hispanic, region, msa, central city. Standard errors are in parentheses.

Table 2b. OLS Regression Coefficients of Selected Variables from NLSY Log Wage Regressions for Workers Ages 35-43

(1) (2) (3) (5)

Page 12: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

 

Reference Group:

Unadjusted mean log wage gap : E[ ln(w m )]-E[ ln(w f )] 0.233 ( 0.015) 0.233 ( 0.015) 0.233 ( 0.015) 0.233 ( 0.015) 0.233 ( 0.015)Composition effects attributable to Age, race, region, etc. 0.012 ( 0.003) 0.012 ( 0.003) 0.009 ( 0.003) 0.011 ( 0.003) 0.010 ( 0.003) Education -0.012 ( 0.006) -0.012 ( 0.006) -0.008 ( 0.004) -0.010 ( 0.005) -0.010 ( 0.005) AFQT 0.011 ( 0.003) 0.011 ( 0.003) 0.011 ( 0.003) 0.011 ( 0.003) 0.011 ( 0.003) L.T. withdrawal due to family 0.033 ( 0.011) 0.033 ( 0.011) 0.035 ( 0.008) 0.034 ( 0.007) 0.028 ( 0.007) Life-time work experience 0.137 ( 0.011) 0.137 ( 0.011) 0.087 ( 0.01) 0.112 ( 0.008) 0.092 ( 0.007) Industrial sectors 0.017 ( 0.006) 0.017 ( 0.006) 0.003 ( 0.005) 0.010 ( 0.004) 0.009 ( 0.004) Total explained by model 0.197 ( 0.018) 0.197 ( 0.018) 0.136 ( 0.014) 0.167 ( 0.013) 0.142 ( 0.012)

Wage structure effects attributable to Age, race, region, etc. -0.098 ( 0.234) -0.098 ( 0.234) -0.096 ( 0.232) -0.097 ( 0.233) -0.097 ( 0.24) Education 0.045 ( 0.034) 0.045 ( 0.034) 0.041 ( 0.033) 0.043 ( 0.034) 0.043 ( 0.031) AFQT 0.003 ( 0.023) 0.003 ( 0.023) 0.003 ( 0.025) 0.003 ( 0.024) 0.002 ( 0.025) L.T. withdrawal due to family 0.003 ( 0.017) 0.003 ( 0.017) 0.001 ( 0.004) 0.002 ( 0.011) 0.007 ( 0.01) Life-time work experience 0.048 ( 0.062) 0.048 ( 0.062) 0.098 ( 0.067) 0.073 ( 0.064) 0.092 ( 0.065) Industrial sectors -0.092 ( 0.033) 0.014 ( 0.028) -0.077 ( 0.029) -0.085 ( 0.031) -0.084 ( 0.032) Constant 0.128 ( 0.213) 0.022 ( 0.212) 0.193 ( 0.211) 0.128 ( 0.213) 0.128 ( 0.216)Total wage structure - Unexplained log wage gap

0.036 ( 0.019) 0.036 ( 0.019) 0.097 ( 0.016) 0.066 ( 0.015) 0.092 ( 0.014)

Note: The data is an extract from the NLSY79 used in O'Neill and O'Neill (2006). The other explanatory variables are age, dummies for black, hispanic, region, msa, central city. In column (1), the omitted industrial sector is "Primary, Construction, and Utilities". In column (2), the omitted industrial sector is "Education, Health and Public Admin". Standard errors are in parentheses. The means of the variables are reported in Table 2.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Table 3. Gender Wage Gap: Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Results (NLSY, 2000)

Using Male Coef. from col. 2, Table 2

Using Female Coef. Using Weighted Sum Using Male Coef. from col. 4, Table 2

Using Pooled from col. 5, Table 2

Page 13: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

1.4 Oaxaca-Blinder in Stata

• Choose package by Ben Jann for ETH Zurich

st0151 from http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj8-4SJ8-4 st0151. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear... / TheBlinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression / models / by Ben Jann,ETH Zurich / Support: [email protected] / After installation, type helpoaxaca

. *** Table 3, Column 2;

. oaxaca lropc00 age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black> sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_col> afqtp89 famrspb wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 primary eduheal othind,> by(female) weight(1)> detail(groupdem:age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black,> groupaf:afqtp89,> grouped:sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_col ,> groupfam:famrspb,

Page 14: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

> groupex:wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 ,> groupind: primary eduheal othind) ;

Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition Number of obs = 5309

1: female = 02: female = 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------lropc00 | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Differential |Prediction_1 | 2.762557 .0106598 259.16 0.000 2.741664 2.78345Prediction_2 | 2.529257 .0100367 252.00 0.000 2.509585 2.548928Difference | .2333003 .0146413 15.93 0.000 .2046039 .2619967

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Explained |

groupdem | .0115371 .0032919 3.50 0.000 .0050851 .0179891grouped | -.0124049 .0055175 -2.25 0.025 -.023219 -.0015907groupaf | .0108035 .0034414 3.14 0.002 .0040584 .0175486

groupfam | .0328186 .0106373 3.09 0.002 .0119698 .0536674

Page 15: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

groupex | .137095 .0112599 12.18 0.000 .1150259 .159164groupind | .0174583 .0061707 2.83 0.005 .005364 .0295526

Total | .1973076 .0180079 10.96 0.000 .1620128 .2326024-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Unexplained |

groupdem | -.0978872 .2338861 -0.42 0.676 -.5562956 .3605212grouped | .0454348 .0344576 1.32 0.187 -.0221009 .1129705groupaf | .0026284 .023485 0.11 0.911 -.0434014 .0486582

groupfam | .0025869 .0174562 0.15 0.882 -.0316266 .0368005groupex | .0475104 .0616535 0.77 0.441 -.0733281 .168349

groupind | .0137992 .0283532 0.49 0.626 -.0417722 .0693705_cons | .0219201 .2117714 0.10 0.918 -.3931443 .4369844Total | .0359927 .0185897 1.94 0.053 -.0004425 .0724279

------------------------------------------------------------------------------groupdem: age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic blackgrouped: sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_colgroupaf: afqtp89groupfam: famrspbgroupex: wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22groupind: primary eduheal othind

Page 16: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

. *** Table 3, Column 3;

. oaxaca lropc00 age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black> sch_10 sch10_12 diploma_hs ged_hs bachelor_col master_col doctor_col> afqtp89 famrspb wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 manuf eduheal othind,> by(female) weight(0)> detail(groupdem:age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black,> groupaf:afqtp89,> grouped:sch_10 sch10_12 diploma_hs ged_hs bachelor_col master_col doctor_col> groupfam:famrspb,> groupex:wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 ,> groupind: manuf eduheal othind) ;

Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition Number of obs = 5309

1: female = 02: female = 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------lropc00 | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Differential |

Page 17: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

Prediction_1 | 2.762557 .0106598 259.16 0.000 2.741664 2.78345Prediction_2 | 2.529257 .0100367 252.00 0.000 2.509585 2.548928Difference | .2333003 .0146413 15.93 0.000 .2046039 .2619967

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Explained |

groupdem | .0094784 .0031157 3.04 0.002 .0033717 .0155851grouped | -.0077608 .0044009 -1.76 0.078 -.0163864 .0008648groupaf | .0106791 .0034073 3.13 0.002 .004001 .0173572

groupfam | .0348287 .008156 4.27 0.000 .0188433 .0508141groupex | .0869987 .0098831 8.80 0.000 .0676281 .1063692

groupind | .0024117 .0050158 0.48 0.631 -.0074191 .0122424Total | .1366357 .0143218 9.54 0.000 .1085655 .1647059

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Unexplained |

groupdem | -.0977918 .2325136 -0.42 0.674 -.5535101 .3579264grouped | -.0218645 .0204702 -1.07 0.285 -.0619853 .0182563groupaf | .0027562 .0250163 0.11 0.912 -.0462749 .0517873

groupfam | .0005559 .0041199 0.13 0.893 -.007519 .0086307groupex | .0974398 .0673318 1.45 0.148 -.0345281 .2294078

groupind | -.0770291 .0290617 -2.65 0.008 -.1339889 -.0200692_cons | .1925981 .2109645 0.91 0.361 -.2208846 .6060809

Page 18: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

Total | .0966646 .0161679 5.98 0.000 .0649761 .128353------------------------------------------------------------------------------groupdem: age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic blackgrouped: sch_10 sch10_12 diploma_hs ged_hs bachelor_col master_col doctor_coldoctor_col

groupaf: afqtp89groupfam: famrspbgroupex: wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22groupind: manuf eduheal othind

. *** Table 3, Column 5;

. oaxaca lropc00 age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black> sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_col afqtp89> famrspb wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 manuf eduheal othind,> by(female) pooled> detail(groupdem:age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic black,> groupaf:afqtp89,> grouped:sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_col ,> groupfam:famrspb,> groupex:wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22 ,> groupind: manuf eduheal othind) ;

Page 19: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition Number of obs = 5309

1: female = 02: female = 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Robust

lropc00 | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Differential |Prediction_1 | 2.762557 .0106321 259.83 0.000 2.741718 2.783395Prediction_2 | 2.529257 .0100104 252.66 0.000 2.509637 2.548877Difference | .2333003 .0146031 15.98 0.000 .2046787 .2619218

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Explained |

groupdem | .0103136 .0029705 3.47 0.001 .0044914 .0161357grouped | -.0095283 .0046437 -2.05 0.040 -.0186298 -.0004268groupaf | .0110502 .0034317 3.22 0.001 .0043242 .0177762

groupfam | .0281105 .006622 4.25 0.000 .0151316 .0410895groupex | .0923997 .0070155 13.17 0.000 .0786494 .1061499

Page 20: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

groupind | .0091617 .003619 2.53 0.011 .0020686 .0162548Total | .1415073 .0121464 11.65 0.000 .1177008 .1653138

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------Unexplained |

groupdem | -.0966636 .2401926 -0.40 0.687 -.5674324 .3741051grouped | .0425582 .031011 1.37 0.170 -.0182222 .1033387groupaf | .0023818 .0247265 0.10 0.923 -.0460812 .0508448

groupfam | .007295 .0096194 0.76 0.448 -.0115587 .0261487groupex | .0922058 .0650471 1.42 0.156 -.0352842 .2196957

groupind | -.083719 .0315878 -2.65 0.008 -.14563 -.0218081_cons | .1277349 .2162801 0.59 0.555 -.2961664 .5516361Total | .091793 .0137999 6.65 0.000 .0647457 .1188402

------------------------------------------------------------------------------groupdem: age00 msa ctrlcity north_central south00 west hispanic blackgrouped: sch_10 diploma_hs ged_hs smcol bachelor_col master_col doctor_colgroupaf: afqtp89groupfam: famrspbgroupex: wkswk_18 yrsmil78_00 pcntpt_22groupind: manuf eduheal othind

Page 21: 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Examplefaculty.arts.ubc.ca/nfortin/DM_example1.pdf · 1 Decomposition Methods - Illustrative Example • Follow up to “Decomposition Methods

1.5 Choosing the base (omitted) category

• Resist mindless normalization of coefficients

• Favor interpretability of the results and comparability with literature


Recommended