1 ElectroScience Lab Development of a Hemispherical Near Field Range with an Imperfect Ground Plane...

1

ElectroScience Lab

Development of a Hemispherical Near Field Rangewith an Imperfect Ground Plane

AMTA 2005 Update - PART 2

Eric Walton The Ohio St. Univ. Teh-Hong Lee The Ohio St. Univ.

G. Frank Paynter The Ohio St. Univ.Carey Buxton FBI AcademyJeffrey Snow NSWC/Crane

2005 AMTA Symposium

Oct. 31 – Nov. 4, 2005

2

ElectroScience Lab

Dr. Eric K. Walton The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH

Dr. Teh Hong Lee, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH

Carrey Buxton; FBI Academy, Quantico, VA

Jeff Snow; Naval Surf. Weap. Ctr, Crane Labs., Crane, IN

THE TEAM:

3

ElectroScience Lab

THE PROBLEM

The gain patterns of VHF/UHF antennas on structures that sit adjacent to the ground are influenced by the characteristics of the ground. Typical ground conductivity is such that VHF/UHF signals propagate significantly into the ground. The test and measurement of such antennas are more accurate with a test chamber that incorporates an imperfect ground.

BUT:Normal spherical mode expansion techniques will not work in such an environment.

APPROACH:A plane wave synthesis algorithm will be used along with an “outside the sphere” ground reflection term.

Note that this is our 2nd annual talk on this topic.

4

ElectroScience Lab

GROUND REFLECTIONS IN NF MEASUREMENTSGROUND REFLECTIONS IN NF MEASUREMENTS

SUMMARY/ INTRODUCTION

•The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory, the Naval Surf. Weap. Ctr, Crane Labs, Crane, IN are working to build a near field antenna measurement range.

•The range is optimized for ground vehicles and thus is built as a hemispherical scanning system over a realistic roadway/ground surface.

•The chamber size is 12.2 m high by 17.7 m wide by 21.3 m long. It will have absorber covered walls and ceiling with requirements from VHF to S-band.

5

ElectroScience Lab


THE BASIC CHAMBER

•The surface of the chamber is a layer of concrete over a pit filled with damp sand 3 m deep. •To avoid asymmetry, the concrete will not have metal reinforcement bars. •The test vehicles will be driven onto an “H” frame so that the wheels rest on small metal pads connected to a central pivot. It will be lifted and rotated only 3 cm above the surface of the ground. This avoids the reflections from the edge of a large drive-on turntable that is sometimes used in such test ranges.

6

ElectroScience Lab


7

ElectroScience Lab


The probe positioning systemThe probe positioning system•THETA: Steel arm connected to a central pivot

•PHI: vehicle will rotate on the turntable while the arm moves in an arc.

•The turntable and the arm move continuously. There is no stopping and starting of the two positioners.

•Each frequency domain data point will be at a different position. This will require that the software transformations from the near field data to the far field must take these positional increments vs. frequency into account.

8

ElectroScience Lab


Transformation SoftwareTransformation Software

•The typical method of transforming from the near field to the far field consists of taking advantage of the efficiency of the Fourier transform.•The data are transformed into a spectrum of plane waves in the geometrical system to be used.

•plane wave spectral components; •cylindrical wave components•spherical waves

9

ElectroScience Lab

HISTORY:HISTORY:

• Probe corrected near-field scanning on a spherical surface was first solved in 1970 by Jensen in a doctoral dissertation at Technical University of Denmark.

• Much of the history of near field scanning and transformation development is given in a 1988 special issue of the IEEE AP-S Transactions (V. 36, No. 6, June 1988).


10

ElectroScience Lab


•We are doing a hemispherical scan over an imperfect ground. •We do not have a complete set of spherical data. •since the ground is not perfectly reflecting, we cannot create a full set of spherical probe points by imaging.

We have collected all of the data that would propagate to the far field, however. Thus, we have a full set of data.

RAY PATHS

11

ElectroScience Lab


For this reason, we have chosen to perform the transformation from the near field to the far field by using

a direct transformation (plane wave synthesis).

•We define the far field direction and integrate (sum) the measurement over the lit zone of the measurement hemisphere.

•We take polarization effects into account during this process.

•Each test frequency has an associated set of test points, and must be summed independently.

This process does not permit the efficiencies associated with using Fourier (or cylinderical or spherical) components in an expansion, so the process is very inefficient. Modern very high speed computers will permit the transformations to be done in reasonable time.

12

ElectroScience Lab


The propagation from the vehicle to the far field point however can be by a direct propagation path, a ground reflection inside the probing zone, or a reflection outside of the probing zone.

RAY PATHS

13

ElectroScience Lab


Thus the ray paths to consider when computing the far field:

Possible Ray Paths from the Probe Zone to the Far Field.

We have confirmed with borehole measurements of the dielectric properties of the sand that the loss in the sand is enough to mask reflections from the bottom of the pit.

(“What goes in does not come out”.)

14

ElectroScience Lab


MEASUREMENT POINTSMEASUREMENT POINTS

15

ElectroScience Lab


Amplitude of the Probe Data Over a Hemisphere

(omnidirectional probe antenna case)

16

ElectroScience Lab


17

ElectroScience Lab

Next compute the Far Field pattern due to the AUT modelNext compute the Far Field pattern due to the AUT model

•Given the probe data points (/2; arrays)

•And given the value (complex) of E(,) for each &

•For a chosen set of far field angles (ff and ff arrays)

•Compute sum over “lit” region:

),(),(lit

probe ppffffff SE


18

ElectroScience Lab

Hemispherical NF Probing(with ground bounce effects)

Radius = 4 m; Freq. = 0.7 GHz

19

ElectroScience Lab


Far Field Azimuthal Patterns at 15 degrees elevation. (exact, direct, ground reflected, and sum)

20

ElectroScience Lab



21

ElectroScience Lab



22

ElectroScience Lab



23

ElectroScience Lab



24

ElectroScience Lab


25

ElectroScience Lab

2004 CONCLUSIONS2004 CONCLUSIONS

• It is necessary to consider external ground reflections to obtain accurate FF patterns from NF probe data.

• We have developed a NF to FF algorithm that separately computes the direct signal, the ground reflected signal and the sum signal.

• It is necessary to make assumptions about the ground reflection coefficient in order to accurately compute the FF patterns (of course this is in the case where there is significant ground reflection outside the domain of the probe hemisphere)

26

ElectroScience Lab


2004 CONCLUSIONS (cont)2004 CONCLUSIONS (cont)

• WE ARE DESIGNING A GROUND VEHICLE NF ANTENNA MEASUREMENT RANGE

• WE BELIEVE THAT HEMISPHERICAL PROBING ABOVE A REALISTIC GROUND CAN BE DONE

• THE TRANSFORMATION FROM THE NF TO THE FF MUST INCLUDE THE EXTERNAL GROUND REFLECTION

27

ElectroScience Lab


2005 WORK• Complete the NF to FF algorithm development for the omnidirectional probe data in order to explore the behavior of the algorithm

• Include probe correction in the algorithm development work.

• Include full polarization development work in the algorithm development work.

•Begin the deliverable software development with an initial transition of the algorithm to the C++ programming.

28

ElectroScience Lab

SUPPORT ARM INTERACTIONS

AUT Volume

Dipole

Figure 1. Probe supporting arm and AUT for the hemispherical near field measurement system.

Single dipole:

29

ElectroScience Lab

ARM INTERACTION3-Element X-Directed Dipole Array

Element Spacing: 0.29 Excitations: (0.5,104.4o),(1.04,0.0o),(0.5,-104.4o)

Phi = 0 Degree Cut, Er ComponentFrequency = 150 MHz, Dipole Length=1.1m, Center Element Height=28'

Theta (Degrees)

-90 -75 -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90

Nea

r F

ield

Pat

tern

(dB

)

-70

-65

-60

-55

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

Er, Dipole OnlyEr, Scattered Field

3-Element X-Directed Dipole ArrayElement Spacing: 0.29

Excitations: (0.5,104.4o),(1.04,0.0o),(0.5,-104.4o)Phi = 0 Degree Cut, EComponent

Frequency = 150 MHz, Dipole Length=1.1m, Center Element Height=28'

Theta (Degrees)

-90 -75 -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90

Nea

r F

ield

Pa

ttern

(dB

)

-70

-65

-60

-55

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

E, Dipole Only

E, Scattered Field

•Studies involved various probe types and arm shapes.•Spurious signals can be reduced to better than 25 dB below the direct signals even at the lowest frequencies. Performance is better at the higher frequencies.

3 ele. array

30

ElectroScience Lab

MOIST SAND STUDY

Dielectric constants of sands with various moisture content.

31

ElectroScience Lab

Dielectric Constant: C1TOPA

Frequency (GHz)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Ma

gn

itud

e

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

'

"

Reflection Coefficient: C1TOPAThickness = 3 metersWith and Without PEC

Frequency (MHz)

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300

Ref

lect

ion

Co

effic

ient

(dB

)

-10

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

With PECWithout PEC

(a) dielectric constant (b) reflection coefficients

Dielectric constant and the reflection coefficients of sample C1TOPA obtained from the proposed site of the facility.

3 m; w &w/o PEC

MOIST SAND STUDY(borehole example)

BOTTOM LINE: “WHAT GOES IN, STAYS IN”

32

ElectroScience Lab

PROBE INTERACTIONWITH FLOOR

X Directed /2 Dipole 3.0 m Above Dielectric Half SpaceDielectric: ' = 2.75, tan = 0.042

Frequency: 150 MHz, Probe Position: 7.3152 m from Source

Vertical Displacement (m)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

No

rma

lize

d N

ea

r F

ield

Pa

ttern

(d

B)

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

ESP, With HalfSpaceESP, Without Half SpaceBSC, With HalfSpaceBSC, Without HalfSpace

X Directed /2 Dipole 3.0 m Above Dielectric Half SpaceC1TOPA, Dielectric: ' = 4.3, tan = 0.1512



0 1 2 3 4 5 6

No

rma

lize

d N

ea

r F

ield

Pa

ttern

(d

B)

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5


(a) ’ = 2.75, tan = 0.042 (b) ’ = 4.3, tan = 0.1512

X Directed /2 Dipole 3.0 m Above Dielectric Half SpaceDry Concrete, Dielectric: ' = 4.5, tan = 0.0025



0 1 2 3 4 5 6

No

rma

lize

d N

ea

r F

ield

Pa

ttern

(d

B)

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5


X Directed /2 Dipole 3.0 m Above Dielectric Half SpaceConcrete, Dielectric: ' = 8.8, tan = 0.3182



0 1 2 3 4 5 6

No

rma

lize

d N

ea

r F

ield

Pa

ttern

(d

B)

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5


(c) ’ = 4.5, tan = 0.0025 (d) ’ = 8.8, tan = 0.3182

Figure 29. Near field data at 150 MHz of a /2 dipole with and without the presence of material half space with different dielectric constants. The dipole is 3 meter above the

half space.

33

ElectroScience Lab

PROBE INTERACTIONWITH FLOOR

Probe Interaction Study ConclusionsProbe Interaction Study Conclusions

•The difference between the ESP/MOM and BSC/PO results are due to evanescent coupling between the dipole and ground.•The difference becomes very small when the antenna is more than 0.5 l above the ground.•Nyquist sampling requirement for near field probing only requires that we use data down to 0.5 l above the ground.•Therefore, we believe that evanescent coupling in the NSWC-Crane hemispherical NF range will not cause significant errors. •We will still need a slot in the ground to permit the longer elements of the log-periodic antenna to extend below ground level so the shorter elements (higher frequency region) can still approach to within 0.5 l of the ground.•We believe a narrow thin slot is the best approach to accommodate the log-periodic antenna near the ground.

34

ElectroScience Lab

PLANE WAVE SYNTHESIS

AUT

SynthesizedPlane WaveWavefront

Radiatingelements

Surface of ground

Individual spatial displacements

Synthesized below-ground elements(green)

Sketch of plane wave synthesis geometry.

35

ElectroScience Lab

FF

Ptp

tf

fpff

delf

Ft

Pt

FfPf

X

Z

Y

Geometry for the near field to far field transformation


36

ElectroScience Lab

EXAMPLE RESULTS

• Consider a single horizontal dipole. – oriented in the x-direction – 1.2 feet (0.366 meters) above a lossy dielectric half space.

• relative permittivity = 2.75• loss tangent = tan (δ) = 0.042.

• frequency of operation = 500 MHz (wavelength = 60 cm)• probe hemisphere radius is 12 feet (3.66 meters).

• The raw probe data was synthesized using a geometrical theory of diffraction computer code written by Dr. Ron Marhafka at the ESL (called NEC-BSC).

• The near field to far field transformation was written in MATLAB.


37

ElectroScience Lab

Far Field Pattern of Horizontal /2 Dipole1.2'Above Lossy Ground Plane ('=2.75, tan = 0.042) Along Z-Axis

Frequency = 500 MHz, Phi = 0 Degree CutPeak Directivity = 8.82 dBi

Theta (Degrees)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

FF

Pattern

(dB

i)

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

THETA vs E-TH-DB THETA vs E-PH-DB



Theta (Degrees)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

FF

Pa

tte

rn (

dB

i)

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10




Theta (Degrees)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

FF

Pa

tte

rn (

dB

i)

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10


(a) (b)

(c)

Exact far field pattern results for the ½ wave dipole.(a. at φ = 0 degrees, (b) at φ = 45 deg. (c) at φ = 90 deg.


38

ElectroScience Lab

(a) (b)

(c)

Result of transformation to the far field; E-theta and E-phi vs. Theta(a) Phi = 0 deg.; Phi = 45 deg., Phi = 90 deg.)

PLANE WAVE SYNTHESIS Click quickly

39

ElectroScience Lab

GUI-BASED C++ PACKAGE“CRANE BENCH”

This algorithm was passed to Frank Paynter, to develop a C++ GUI based package

SOFTWARE PACKAGE PRIMARY GOALS:•Interactive; user-friendly •ASCII-formatted near field probe data•Display•analyze

SUB-GOALS •Interactive via mouse clicks•use the widely-supported MS Windows ‘look and feel’•simple ASCII data formats •transform hemispherical near field probe data into far field•plot the results in a number of ways.

40

ElectroScience Lab

CRANEBENCH(by Frank Paynter)

Crane DDAS Workbench User Interface

41

ElectroScience Lab

INTERESTING EXAMPLE(probe data)

E-theta E-phi E-r

• H-dipole; 1.2 ft. above realistic gnd; • 7 ft. offset in x direction• 12 ft. radius scanner; 500 MHz;

(note non-zero r-component)

42

ElectroScience Lab

INTERESTING EXAMPLEC:\Documents and Settings\Sharon\Desktop\05-CRANE\CRANEBENCH_3-7-05\1hdipole-zd-x7_0-y0_0-z1_2_ra12ft_0500mhz_sphere_1.oaa

0 90 180 270 360Phi (Deg) at Theta = 80.00

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mag

nitu

de (d

B)E-THgE-PHgE-THuE-PHuE-THtE-PHt

Maximum = 57.264999C:\Documents and Settings\Sharon\Desktop\05-CRANE\CRANEBENCH_3-7-05\1hdipole-zd-x7_0-y0_0-z1_2_ra12ft_0500mhz_sphere_2.oaa

0 90 180 270 360Phi (Deg) at Theta = 50.00

10

20

30

40

50

60M

agni

tude

(dB

)

E-THgE-PHgE-THuE-PHuE-THtE-PHt

Maximum = 56.317501

FAR ZONE CONICAL CUTS

NOTE THE RECOVERED SYMMETRY

43

ElectroScience Lab

INTERESTING EXAMPLE(FAR FIELD RESULT)

E-theta E-phi

44

ElectroScience Lab

CONCLUSIONS• WE HAVE DEVELOPED AN ALGORITHM FOR

TRANSFORMATION FROM THE NF TO THE FF OVER A REALISTIC GROUND

• WE HAVE PORTED THE ALGORITHM FROM MATLAB (development) TO C++ (user GUI)

• WE HAVE TESTED THE ALGORITHM FOR VARIOUS STRESSFUL CASES AND ARE DEVELOPING RULES OF THUMB FOR THE USER (SET UP PARAMETERS AND ACCURACY ESTIMATES)

45

ElectroScience Lab

HEY !IS THAT

A HEMI ?

Dr. Eric K. WaltonDr. Eric K. Walton, The Ohio State Univ.

Dr. Teh Hong Lee, The Ohio State Univ.

G. Frank Paynter The Ohio State Univ.

Carey Buxton, FBI Academy

Jeff Snow; NSWC/Crane

Date post:	24-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	elfreda-rodgers
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times