11

ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT

IN IN

GAS HANDLING & PROCESSINGGAS HANDLING & PROCESSING

(5(5thth JUNE 2008) JUNE 2008)DELHIDELHI

M M MANDALGAIL (INDIA) LTD.

22

PRESNTATION OUTLINEPRESNTATION OUTLINE

• ENERGY SCENARIO – AN OVERVIEWENERGY SCENARIO – AN OVERVIEW

• BARRIERS TO ENERGY CONSERVATIONBARRIERS TO ENERGY CONSERVATION

• BENEFITS OF CONSERVATIONBENEFITS OF CONSERVATION

• GAIL’s APPROACH TO ENERGY EFFICIENCYGAIL’s APPROACH TO ENERGY EFFICIENCY

• SUGGESTIONSSUGGESTIONS

33

INDIAN ECONOMY: SNAPSHOTSINDIAN ECONOMY: SNAPSHOTS

• INDIAN ECONOMY IS:INDIAN ECONOMY IS:

-- 1212THTH LARGEST IN THE WORLD WITH A GDP OF US LARGEST IN THE WORLD WITH A GDP OF US $ 1.25 TRILLION (CHINA-3.25 TRILLION & USA-$ 1.25 TRILLION (CHINA-3.25 TRILLION & USA-13.79 TRILLION)13.79 TRILLION)

- 33RD RD LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD, IN TERMS LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD, IN TERMS OF PURCHASING POWER.OF PURCHASING POWER.

(SOURCE: CIA WEBSITE)(SOURCE: CIA WEBSITE)

• ACHIEVED A GDP GROWTH RATE OF 9.4% IN 2006-07 ACHIEVED A GDP GROWTH RATE OF 9.4% IN 2006-07 viz-a-viz CHINA-10.7 %, BRAZIL-3.7% & RUSSIA-6.7%.viz-a-viz CHINA-10.7 %, BRAZIL-3.7% & RUSSIA-6.7%.

• TARGET FOR NEXT 20 YEARS – 10 %.TARGET FOR NEXT 20 YEARS – 10 %.

44

ENERGY SCENARIOENERGY SCENARIO (INDIA Vs OTHERS)(INDIA Vs OTHERS)

● 15% OF WORLD’S POPULATION- 3% OF GLOBAL 15% OF WORLD’S POPULATION- 3% OF GLOBAL ENERGY USAGE.ENERGY USAGE.

● PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY (TOE/CAPITA):(TOE/CAPITA):-- INDIAINDIA : 0.49: 0.49-- CHINACHINA : 1.32: 1.32-- BRAZILBRAZIL : 1.12: 1.12-- USAUSA : 7.89: 7.89-- WORLD AVERAGEWORLD AVERAGE: 1.77: 1.77(Source: Key world Energy Statistic-2007 - IEA)(Source: Key world Energy Statistic-2007 - IEA)

● FLOURISHING ECONOMY – HIGH ENERGY FLOURISHING ECONOMY – HIGH ENERGY REQUIREMENT TO SUSTAIN GROWTH.REQUIREMENT TO SUSTAIN GROWTH.

55

ENERGY SCENARIO: PRIMARY ENERGY SCENARIO: PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION PATTERNENERGY CONSUMPTION PATTERN

WorldWorld IndiaIndia

Energy Consumption Energy Consumption (MTOE)(MTOE) 10,87810,878

423423

55thth Largest Energy Largest Energy ConsumerConsumer

Energy Mix (%)Energy Mix (%)

Coal Coal 28.4%28.4% 56.2%56.2%

OilOil 35.8%35.8% 28.4%28.4%

Natural gasNatural gas 23.7%23.7% 8.5%8.5%

Nuclear Nuclear 5.8%5.8% 0.9%0.9%

HydroHydro 6.3%6.3% 6.0%6.0%

Oil & Gas ImportsOil & Gas Imports

(MTOE) -2006(MTOE) -2006

3,2643,264 119119

Growth in Energy (10 yrs)Growth in Energy (10 yrs)

Total Primary Energy Total Primary Energy 2.3%2.3% 5.6%5.6%

Natural Gas Natural Gas 2.7%2.7% 9.4%9.4%

Source : BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2007

66

BARRIERS TO ENERGY BARRIERS TO ENERGY CONSERVATION EFFORTSCONSERVATION EFFORTS

● NEW PROJECTS GET PRIORITYNEW PROJECTS GET PRIORITY

● ANNUAL BENEFITS ON ENERGY CONSERVATION LOOKS ANNUAL BENEFITS ON ENERGY CONSERVATION LOOKS SMALL AND HENCE USUALLY GET LESS ATTENTION.SMALL AND HENCE USUALLY GET LESS ATTENTION.

● LACK OF FOCUS / ADEQUATE KNOWLEDGE TO IDENTIFY LACK OF FOCUS / ADEQUATE KNOWLEDGE TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL AREAS FOR ENERGY OPTIMIZATION.POTENTIAL AREAS FOR ENERGY OPTIMIZATION.

● IN-ADEQUATE R&D INVESTMENTS.IN-ADEQUATE R&D INVESTMENTS.

● IN-ADEQUATE INDUSTRY AWARENESS OF NEW IN-ADEQUATE INDUSTRY AWARENESS OF NEW TECHNOLOGY.TECHNOLOGY.

77

CONSERVATION CONSERVATION

IN IN

GAS SECTORGAS SECTOR

88

OVERALL DEMAND SUPPLY OVERALL DEMAND SUPPLY BALANCEBALANCE

2007-082007-08 2008-092008-09 2009-102009-10 2010-112010-11 2011-122011-12

Projected Domestic Projected Domestic SupplySupply 80.5480.54 119.98119.98 189.97189.97 197.09197.09 202.3202.3

LNG SupplyLNG Supply 30.4530.45 33.633.6 52.552.5 7070 83.1283.12

Total Supply Total Supply 110.99110.99 153.58153.58 242.47242.47 267.09267.09 285.42285.42

Total Demand Total Demand 179.17179.17 196.64196.64 225.52225.52 262.07262.07 279.43279.43

Demand Supply Gap Demand Supply Gap 68.1868.18 43.0643.06 (-) 16.95(-) 16.95 (-) 5.02(-) 5.02 (-) 5.99(-) 5.99

Source: Sub-Group of Natural Gas, MoP&NG

MMSCMD

99

ENERGY ENERGY CONSERVATIONCONSERVATIONGAIL’s APPROACHGAIL’s APPROACH

● IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT AND THEIR IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT AND THEIR SOLUTION THROUGH SOLUTION THROUGH

-- QUALITY CIRCLE AT SHOP FLOORQUALITY CIRCLE AT SHOP FLOOR-- STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(SIX SIGMA)STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(SIX SIGMA)-- 5S5S-- KAIZANKAIZAN-- RE-ENGINEERING & EVALUATIONRE-ENGINEERING & EVALUATION

● IDENTIFICATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGY / IDENTIFICATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGY / EQUIPMENT.EQUIPMENT.

● TRAINING AND AWARENESS TO ALL EMPLOYEES THROUGH TRAINING AND AWARENESS TO ALL EMPLOYEES THROUGH SEMINARS / WORK SHOPS / QUIZES AT PERIODIC INTERVALS.SEMINARS / WORK SHOPS / QUIZES AT PERIODIC INTERVALS.

● PERIODIC ENERGY AUDITS AT ALL WORK CENTERS.PERIODIC ENERGY AUDITS AT ALL WORK CENTERS.

● IMPLEMENTATION OF EMPLOYEES SUGGESTION SCHEMES.IMPLEMENTATION OF EMPLOYEES SUGGESTION SCHEMES.

● SYSTEM OF MoU INCLUDING ENERGY PARAMETERS BETWEEN SYSTEM OF MoU INCLUDING ENERGY PARAMETERS BETWEEN VARIOUS REGIONAL CENTRES & CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.VARIOUS REGIONAL CENTRES & CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.

1010

ENERGY CONSERVATION - ENERGY CONSERVATION - MEASURES TAKENMEASURES TAKEN

● QUICK HIT PROJECTSQUICK HIT PROJECTS

- BENCH MARKING OF VARIOUS PROCESS UNITS WITH WORLD BEST. BENCH MARKING OF VARIOUS PROCESS UNITS WITH WORLD BEST.

- AWARENESS CAMPAIGN TO SAVE ENERGY THROUGH OPTIMAL AWARENESS CAMPAIGN TO SAVE ENERGY THROUGH OPTIMAL UTILIZATION / RUNNING OF STATIC AND ROTATING EQUIPMENTS.UTILIZATION / RUNNING OF STATIC AND ROTATING EQUIPMENTS.

- MAINTAINING P.F. IN THE RANGE OF 0.95 TO 1.0 THROUGH MAINTAINING P.F. IN THE RANGE OF 0.95 TO 1.0 THROUGH INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL P.F. IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENTS INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL P.F. IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENTS RESULTED IN ANNUAL SAVINGS OF RS. 20.6 LACS.RESULTED IN ANNUAL SAVINGS OF RS. 20.6 LACS.

- MODIFICATION IN LIGHTING SYSTEM RESULTED IN OVER 8 LACS KW MODIFICATION IN LIGHTING SYSTEM RESULTED IN OVER 8 LACS KW HRS OF ENERGY SAVING WITH COST SAVINGS OF RS 40 LACS.HRS OF ENERGY SAVING WITH COST SAVINGS OF RS 40 LACS.

- REDUCTION IN NITROGEN CONSUMPTION IN PROCESSING PLANT REDUCTION IN NITROGEN CONSUMPTION IN PROCESSING PLANT RESULTED IN COST SAVINGS OF RS 1.27 CRS PER ANNUM.RESULTED IN COST SAVINGS OF RS 1.27 CRS PER ANNUM.

- SAVINGS IN FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION THROUGH SWITCHING OVER SAVINGS IN FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION THROUGH SWITCHING OVER FROM FUEL GAS TO NITROGEN FOR FLARE END PURGING RESULTED FROM FUEL GAS TO NITROGEN FOR FLARE END PURGING RESULTED IN FUEL SAVINGS OF RS 14.72 CRS PER ANNUM.IN FUEL SAVINGS OF RS 14.72 CRS PER ANNUM.

1111

● VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE(VFD) SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE(VFD) SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED FOR SOME PUMPS e.g. JOCKEY PUMPS (LPG-GANDHAR), FOR SOME PUMPS e.g. JOCKEY PUMPS (LPG-GANDHAR), REACTOR FEED PUMP (LLDPE UNIT).REACTOR FEED PUMP (LLDPE UNIT).

● REINFORCEMENT OF METTALIC EXPANSION BELLOWS OF REINFORCEMENT OF METTALIC EXPANSION BELLOWS OF HRSG WITH FABRIC EXPANSION BELLOWS FOR ARRESTING HRSG WITH FABRIC EXPANSION BELLOWS FOR ARRESTING LEAKAGES RESULTING IN REDUCTION IN FUEL GAS LEAKAGES RESULTING IN REDUCTION IN FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION TO THE TUNE OF 4.8 CRS PER ANNUM.CONSUMPTION TO THE TUNE OF 4.8 CRS PER ANNUM.

● REPLACEMENT OF THYRISTOR BASED UPS WITH ENERGY REPLACEMENT OF THYRISTOR BASED UPS WITH ENERGY EFFICIENT UPS SYSTEM RESULTING IN ANNUAL COST EFFICIENT UPS SYSTEM RESULTING IN ANNUAL COST SAVINGS OF RS 28 LACS.SAVINGS OF RS 28 LACS.

● STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY FOR MONITORING & STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY FOR MONITORING & CONTROL OF P/L OPERATION THROUGH SCADA.CONTROL OF P/L OPERATION THROUGH SCADA.

● RR 15 (JAGOTI), BECOMES THE FIRST “GREEN RR” WITH ALL RR 15 (JAGOTI), BECOMES THE FIRST “GREEN RR” WITH ALL LOADS ON SOLAR POWER IN HVJLOADS ON SOLAR POWER IN HVJ

ENERGY CONSERVATION ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES TAKEN (Contd…)MEASURES TAKEN (Contd…)

1212

ENERGY EFFICIENCY – MEASURES TAKENENERGY EFFICIENCY – MEASURES TAKEN BENEFITS OF SCADABENEFITS OF SCADA

• REAL TIME MONITORING AND CONTROL FROM A CENTRAL REAL TIME MONITORING AND CONTROL FROM A CENTRAL LOCATION. LOCATION. 

● LEAK DETECTION.LEAK DETECTION.

● PREDICTIVE LOOK AHEAD MODEL FOR OPERATION.PREDICTIVE LOOK AHEAD MODEL FOR OPERATION.

● PREDICTIVE MAINT. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPRS.PREDICTIVE MAINT. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPRS.

1313

ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES PLANNEDPLANNED

● ENERGY SAVING IN HVJ COMPRESSOR STATIONS AT JHABUA & ENERGY SAVING IN HVJ COMPRESSOR STATIONS AT JHABUA & KHERAKHERA

-- MODIFICATION FOR SWAPPING OF APM + PMT RICH GAS &MODIFICATION FOR SWAPPING OF APM + PMT RICH GAS & LNG LNG BETWEEN DVPL & HVJ SYSTEM RESULTING IN STOPPING OF BETWEEN DVPL & HVJ SYSTEM RESULTING IN STOPPING OF COMPRESSORS AT JHABUA & KHERA.COMPRESSORS AT JHABUA & KHERA.

• ADVANCED PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM(APC) IS UNDER ADVANCED PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM(APC) IS UNDER IMPLEMENTATION FOR UPSTREAM UNITS (GPU/LPG/GCU) AT IMPLEMENTATION FOR UPSTREAM UNITS (GPU/LPG/GCU) AT PATA PETROCHEMICAL PROJECT. EXPECTED REDUCTION IN PATA PETROCHEMICAL PROJECT. EXPECTED REDUCTION IN SP. ENERGY CONSUMPTION TO THE TUNE OF 3%.SP. ENERGY CONSUMPTION TO THE TUNE OF 3%.

● ETHYLENE BOIL OFF GAS & SPHERE VAPOURS DIVERSION TO ETHYLENE BOIL OFF GAS & SPHERE VAPOURS DIVERSION TO HDPE UNIT - REDUCING RECYCLING IN GCU. EXPECTED HDPE UNIT - REDUCING RECYCLING IN GCU. EXPECTED BENEFIT OF RS. 10 CRS PER ANNUMBENEFIT OF RS. 10 CRS PER ANNUM

● 32 SVs CONVERTED TO GRID POWER FROM TEG IN JLPL 32 SVs CONVERTED TO GRID POWER FROM TEG IN JLPL RESULTING IN SAVING OF 232 MT OF LPG IN 2007-08RESULTING IN SAVING OF 232 MT OF LPG IN 2007-08

1414

ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES PLANNED (Contd….)PLANNED (Contd….)

● SOLAR POWER SYSTEM AT GANDHAR AT AN APPROX. COST SOLAR POWER SYSTEM AT GANDHAR AT AN APPROX. COST OF RS 9.3 LAKHS WHICH WOULD RESULT IN ANNUAL ENERGY OF RS 9.3 LAKHS WHICH WOULD RESULT IN ANNUAL ENERGY SAVING @ 45360 KWH AND ANNUAL COST SAVING OF RS 2.43 SAVING @ 45360 KWH AND ANNUAL COST SAVING OF RS 2.43 LAKHS.LAKHS.

• INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE IN DVPL INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE IN DVPL COMPRESSOR STATION, VIJAIPUR. EXPECTED SAVINGS OF RS COMPRESSOR STATION, VIJAIPUR. EXPECTED SAVINGS OF RS 7.84 LAC / ANNUM.7.84 LAC / ANNUM.

● WIND ENERGY PROJECTS IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, WIND ENERGY PROJECTS IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, RAJASTHAN & GUJARAT.RAJASTHAN & GUJARAT.

● WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS (GT’s EXHAUST) FOR WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS (GT’s EXHAUST) FOR STEAM / POWER GENERATION AT VAGHODIA / HAZIRA / STEAM / POWER GENERATION AT VAGHODIA / HAZIRA / JHABUA / KHERA COMPRESSOR STATIONS.JHABUA / KHERA COMPRESSOR STATIONS.

1515

● USE OF REACTOR EFFLUENT HEAT TO PRE-HEAT DE-USE OF REACTOR EFFLUENT HEAT TO PRE-HEAT DE-BUTANISER COLUMN FEED, EXPECTED BENEFIT OF RS. 7.84 BUTANISER COLUMN FEED, EXPECTED BENEFIT OF RS. 7.84 LACS PER ANNUM.LACS PER ANNUM.

● DIVERSION OF 0.5 MMSCMD GAS IN BHARUCH REGION FOR DIVERSION OF 0.5 MMSCMD GAS IN BHARUCH REGION FOR PROCESSING AT GPU-GANDHAR.PROCESSING AT GPU-GANDHAR.

● REPLACEMENT OF V-BELT WITH POLY V-BELT IN INST. AIR REPLACEMENT OF V-BELT WITH POLY V-BELT IN INST. AIR COMPRESSOR IN LPG-USAR FOR ENERGY SAVING.COMPRESSOR IN LPG-USAR FOR ENERGY SAVING.

ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES ENERGY EFFICIENCY –MEASURES PLANNED (Contd….)PLANNED (Contd….)

1616

ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS – SOME SUGGESTIONS– SOME SUGGESTIONS

● BENCHMARKING OF ENERGY CONSUMPTIONBENCHMARKING OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION

-- INTERNALLY THROUGH HISTORICAL / TREND INTERNALLY THROUGH HISTORICAL / TREND ANALYSIS.ANALYSIS.-- EXTERNALLY ACROSS SIMILAR INDUSTRIES.EXTERNALLY ACROSS SIMILAR INDUSTRIES.-- IDENTIFICATION OF BEST PRACTICES (BASED ON IDENTIFICATION OF BEST PRACTICES (BASED ON EXTERNAL EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING DATA).BENCHMARKING DATA).

● PERIODIC ENERGY MONITORING AND TARGET SETTING. PERIODIC ENERGY MONITORING AND TARGET SETTING.

● MATCHING SYSTEM / EQUIPMENT SIZING OR RATING WITH MATCHING SYSTEM / EQUIPMENT SIZING OR RATING WITH ACTUAL PROCESS REQUIREMENTS.ACTUAL PROCESS REQUIREMENTS.

● USE OF SP. ENERGY PARAMETERS FOR ASSESSING USE OF SP. ENERGY PARAMETERS FOR ASSESSING PERFORMANCE.PERFORMANCE.

● JUDICIOUS LOADING ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR JUDICIOUS LOADING ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR EVALUATION OF BIDS.EVALUATION OF BIDS.

1717

ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS SOME SUGGESTIONS (Contd…)SOME SUGGESTIONS (Contd…)

● LUCRATIVE DIRECT INCENTIVES TO INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES LUCRATIVE DIRECT INCENTIVES TO INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES THROUGH SUGGESTION SCHEMES INDUCES MANY FOR OUT OF THROUGH SUGGESTION SCHEMES INDUCES MANY FOR OUT OF BOX THINKING.BOX THINKING.

● SUBSTITUTING EXISTING FOSSILS FUEL WITH MORE EFFICIENT SUBSTITUTING EXISTING FOSSILS FUEL WITH MORE EFFICIENT & LESS COST / LESS POLLUTING FUELS.& LESS COST / LESS POLLUTING FUELS.

● CREATION BY STATE BODIES OF AN APPROPRIATE SET OF CREATION BY STATE BODIES OF AN APPROPRIATE SET OF INCENTIVES THROUGH PRICING & OTHER POLICY MEASURES INCENTIVES THROUGH PRICING & OTHER POLICY MEASURES FOR PROMOTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY & CONSERVATION.FOR PROMOTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY & CONSERVATION.

1818

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

1919

GAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTIONGAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTION(LIQUID HYDROCARBON)(LIQUID HYDROCARBON)

S. S. NONO

UNITUNIT CAPACITYCAPACITY

(MMSCMD)(MMSCMD)

LHC PROD.LHC PROD.

(000’ MT)(000’ MT)

FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION (% OF FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION (% OF O/P ENERGY)O/P ENERGY)

BENCHBENCHMARKMARK

ACTUALACTUAL

2005-062005-06 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08 2005-062005-06 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08

11 LPG VIJAIPURLPG VIJAIPUR 15.015.0 601.59601.59 569.41569.41 588.51588.51 1111 9.249.24 9.329.32 8.348.34

22 LPG GANDHARLPG GANDHAR 5.05.0 285.62285.62 297.73297.73 299.89299.89 1111 10.1810.18 10.3210.32 10.4210.42

33 LPG USARLPG USAR 5.05.0 45.2145.21 47.2047.20 50.6550.65 1111 24.9324.93 25.3425.34 21.321.3

44 LPG VAGHODIALPG VAGHODIA 2.52.5 79.6079.60 75.0675.06 81.3881.38 1111 2.502.50 2.652.65 2.42.4

55 LPG PATALPG PATA 1212 288.85288.85 323.0323.0 293.45293.45 1111 9.359.35 8.938.93 7.467.46

66 LPG LAKWALPG LAKWA 2.02.0 24.8724.87 31.0331.03 33.1933.19 1111 74.6074.60 70.9370.93 60.8160.81

DUE TO INCONSISTENT SUPPLY OF FEED GAS FROM ONGC, FUEL CONSUMPTION IS HIGH FOR LPG – LAKWA & USAR

2020

S. S. NONO

PRODUCTPRODUCT PRODUCTION PRODUCTION CAPACITYCAPACITY

(KTA)(KTA)

SP. ENERGY CONSUMPTION (KWH/MT)SP. ENERGY CONSUMPTION (KWH/MT)

GLOBALGLOBAL INTERNAL INTERNAL TARGETTARGET

ACTUALACTUAL

2005-062005-06 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08

11 ETHYLENEETHYLENE 400400 48504850 54655465 53655365 53955395 48924892

22 LLDPELLDPE 210210 980980 10771077 11171117 11361136 11711171

33 HDPEHDPE 100100 980980 890890 967967 884884 891891

GAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTIONGAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTION(PETROCHEMICALS)(PETROCHEMICALS)

2121

GAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTIONGAIL’s ENERGY CONSUMPTION(PIPELINES)(PIPELINES)

S. NOS. NO PIPELINEPIPELINE AVG. FLOW AVG. FLOW RATERATE

ENERGY CONSUMPTION (KJ/MT/KM)ENERGY CONSUMPTION (KJ/MT/KM)

INTERNAL INTERNAL TARGETTARGET

ACTUALACTUAL

2005-062005-06 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08

11 JAMNAGAR-LONI LPG JAMNAGAR-LONI LPG P/LP/L

168 MT/HR168 MT/HR 34.234.2 34.3434.34 33.1633.16 30.2330.23

22 VIZAG – VIZAG – SECUNDERABAD LPG SECUNDERABAD LPG P/LP/L

100 MT/HR100 MT/HR 67.4867.48 79.6379.63 69.2169.21 63.0663.06

A. NATURAL GAS PIPELINES

AVG. FLOW RATE (MMSCMD)AVG. FLOW RATE (MMSCMD) FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION (% OF GAS DELIVERED IN FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION (% OF GAS DELIVERED IN ENERGY TERMS)ENERGY TERMS)

2005 - 062005 - 06 2006 - 072006 - 07 2007 - 082007 - 08 BENCHMARKBENCHMARK ACTUALACTUAL

2005-062005-06 2006-072006-07 2007-082007-08

45.4945.49 47.8647.86 49.3749.37 2.82.8 2.02.0 2.052.05 2.0682.068

B. LPG PIPELINES