Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jonas-pope |
View: | 231 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Evaluation of quick, inexpensive, and reliable methods for determining if ballast water
discharges meet proposed toxicity standards
Noah S. Adams 1, Scott S. Smith 2, Bryan Bjorndal 3, Randall Marshall 4, Allen Pleus 5, Rian Hooff 6, Gary Gertsen 5 and Keith Strieck 5.
1Primary Author (and contact) United States Geological Survey, Email: [email protected], 2USGS- Western Fisheries Research Center, 3Assure Control, 4Oregon State Department of Ecology, 5Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 6Oregon State Department of Environmental Quality
Presented at the Pacific Ballast Work Group, Portland Oregon, April 16, 2014
2
Presentation OutlineBackground
- Previous research that lead to this project
Current Project “100 ships initiative”- Goals - Develop sampling protocols - Gather baseline data
Preliminary Results- 6 countries of origin- 14 vessels
3
Background
Development of a simple, inexpensive, and rapid ballast water treatment system (2009)
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)
Nozzle Mixing Methods
Patents in process
4
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)
Free and protected exchange of information to refine existing ideas or develop new ideas
Private Sector U.S. Government
Accelerate the development and commercialization of ideas that could benefit society
Unbiased evaluation
5
Nozzle mixing was successful (1-3 hours) …but, what about water quality and how do we quantify success??
What is water quality before treatment?
- Is the proper chemistry present for effective treatment?
What is water quality after treatment?
- Is the biocide neutralized before discharge.
In short, chemical toxins may be present (either prior to or because of the treatment) that could cause the ballast to be noncompliant with discharge standards.
Chlorine
Mercury
6
Very little is known about water quality in ballast tanks, partly because current testing methods are expensive and time consuming
7
Search for a simple, inexpensive, and rapid field test to evaluate ballast water quality
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)
Based on a Biosensor
10
Chlorine
Lead
Cadmium
Mercury
Epoxy Resin
Biosensors can be a good way to
measure overall ballast water quality……..
……and determine if water chemistry is compliant with IMO and other regulatory standards
12
How to sample the water- Water sampling devises- Depth in tank to take sample
Other variable to measure when sample is taken
- Temperature- Salinity- pH- Dissolved Oxygen- Others?
Protocol Development
14
Japan Mexico USA China S. Korea Taiwan0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1009
11 312 6
5
17
3
4
12
133
126
Percent of Control Bioluminescence%
Protocol development testing results
14 sample representing 6 countries of origin
Number above bar is days water was in tank
Conduct furtheranalysis
15
4° C Room Temp
4° C Room Temp
4° C Room Temp
4° C Room Temp
4° C Room Temp
USA S. Korea Taiwan Japan Mexico
0102030405060708090
100
Holding Temperature of Sample Before Testing %
Protocol development testing results
16
Filte
red
Unfi
ltere
d
Filte
red
Unfi
ltere
d
Filte
red
Unfi
ltere
d
Filte
red
Unfi
ltere
d
Filte
red
Unfi
ltere
d
USA S. Korea Taiwan Japan Mexico
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Filtered vs. Unfiltered Samples50 µM screen
%
Protocol development testing results
17
Summary- The QwikLite shows promise as a simple,
inexpensive, and rapid way to test ballast water.
- Protocol development is complete.
- Currently have about 70 of the targeted 100 samples.
- Results will be published.
Future Directions- Our hope is that others will conduct similar
sampling to expand global knowledge of ballast water quality.
- This system appears to be an way to quickly and inexpensively evaluate ballast treatment systems.
- What about biological testing?
Chlorine
Epoxy Resin ?