Date post: | 16-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alannah-park |
View: | 234 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Expansions to NOAA’s National Air Quality Forecast Capability
Progress in 2008
October 7, 2008
Paula Davidson*, Rohit Mathur, Jeff McQueen, Scott Jackson, Ivanka Stajner, Ken Carey
*NWS Manager, Air Quality Forecast Capability
2
OutlineOutline
Background on NAQFCBackground on NAQFC
Progress in 2008Progress in 2008- Operational products:Operational products:
- Experimental productsExperimental products
- Developmental testingDevelopmental testing
Coordination with PartnersCoordination with Partners
Looking AheadLooking Ahead
3
National Air Quality Forecast CapabilityNational Air Quality Forecast CapabilityCurrent and Planned Capabilities, 10/08Current and Planned Capabilities, 10/08
• Improving the basis for AQ alertsImproving the basis for AQ alerts• Providing AQ information for people at riskProviding AQ information for people at risk
Near-term Operational Targets:Near-term Operational Targets:• Ozone, smoke coverage extended NationwideOzone, smoke coverage extended Nationwide
Longer range:Longer range:• Quantitative PMQuantitative PM2.52.5 prediction prediction• Extend air quality forecast range to 48-72 hoursExtend air quality forecast range to 48-72 hours• Include broader range of significant pollutantsInclude broader range of significant pollutants
FY08 Prediction Capabilities: FY08 Prediction Capabilities: • Operations:Operations:
Ozone, expanded from EUS to CONUS, 9/07Ozone, expanded from EUS to CONUS, 9/07Smoke implemented over CONUS, 3/07Smoke implemented over CONUS, 3/07
• Experimental testing:Experimental testing:Ozone upgradesOzone upgradesSmoke predictions over AKSmoke predictions over AK
• Developmental testing: Developmental testing: components for particulate matter (PM) forecastscomponents for particulate matter (PM) forecasts
2005: O2005: O3320072007: : OO3,3,smokesmoke
4
Model Components: Linked numerical Model Components: Linked numerical prediction systemprediction systemOperationally integrated on NCEP’s supercomputerOperationally integrated on NCEP’s supercomputer• NAM mesoscale NWP: NAM mesoscale NWP: WRF-NMMWRF-NMM• CMAQ for AQ; HYSPLIT for smokeCMAQ for AQ; HYSPLIT for smoke
Observational Input: Observational Input: • NWS weather observations; NESDIS fire locationsNWS weather observations; NESDIS fire locations
• EPA emissions inventoryEPA emissions inventory
National Air Quality Forecast CapabilityNational Air Quality Forecast Capability End-to-End Operational Capability End-to-End Operational Capability
Gridded forecast guidance productsGridded forecast guidance products• On NWS servers: www.weather.gov/aq and ftp-serversOn NWS servers: www.weather.gov/aq and ftp-servers
• On EPA serversOn EPA servers
• Updated 2x dailyUpdated 2x daily
Verification basis, near-real time:Verification basis, near-real time: • Ground-level AIRNow observations Ground-level AIRNow observations
• Satellite smoke observationsSatellite smoke observations
Customer outreach/feedbackCustomer outreach/feedback• State & Local AQ forecasters coordinated with EPAState & Local AQ forecasters coordinated with EPA
• Public and Private Sector AQ constituentsPublic and Private Sector AQ constituents
AQI: Peak Oct AQI: Peak Oct 44
5
Progress in 2008Progress in 2008
Operational Products: Operational Products: – OzoneOzone: Coast-to-Coast (CONUS) guidance implemented 9/07; 2008 updates for : Coast-to-Coast (CONUS) guidance implemented 9/07; 2008 updates for
emissions, WRF-NMMemissions, WRF-NMM
– SmokeSmoke: CONUS guidance implemented 3/07; 12/07 upgrade to full vertical resolution: CONUS guidance implemented 3/07; 12/07 upgrade to full vertical resolution
Experimental Products:Experimental Products:– Ozone:Ozone: CB-05 chem mechanism, developing prototypes for AK, HI CB-05 chem mechanism, developing prototypes for AK, HI
– SmokeSmoke: Expanded coverage to AK, 6/08: Expanded coverage to AK, 6/08
Developmental Products:Developmental Products:– Aerosols: Developmental testing providing comprehensive dataset for diagnostic Aerosols: Developmental testing providing comprehensive dataset for diagnostic
evaluations. (CONUS)evaluations. (CONUS)
• CMAQ (aerosol option), testing CB05 chemical mechanismCMAQ (aerosol option), testing CB05 chemical mechanism
– Prototypes for AK, HI (ozone); HI (smoke) Prototypes for AK, HI (ozone); HI (smoke)
– Dust and smoke inputs: testing dust contributions to PM2.5 from global sourcesDust and smoke inputs: testing dust contributions to PM2.5 from global sources
• Preliminary tests combining dust with CMAQ-aerosolPreliminary tests combining dust with CMAQ-aerosol
• Case studies combining smoke inputs with CMAQ-aerosolCase studies combining smoke inputs with CMAQ-aerosol
– R&D efforts continuing in chemical data assimilation, real-time emissions sources, R&D efforts continuing in chemical data assimilation, real-time emissions sources, advanced chemical mechanismsadvanced chemical mechanisms
6
Verification Statistics: Example
NN
Obs Obs
MeanMean
Model Model
MeanMean
RMSERMSE
(ppb)(ppb)
NMENME
(%)(%)
MBMB
(ppb)(ppb)
NMBNMB
(%)(%) rr
CONUSCONUS 10941094 56.6256.62 62.2962.29 14.5414.54 19.7319.73 5.665.66 10.0010.00 0.750.75
NN
Obs Obs
MeanMean
Model Model
MeanMean
RMSERMSE
(ppb)(ppb)
NMENME
(%)(%)
MBMB
(ppb)(ppb)
NMBNMB
(%)(%) rr
CONUSCONUS 10941094 56.6256.62 62.2962.29 14.5414.54 19.7319.73 5.665.66 10.0010.00 0.750.75
Max 8-hr OMax 8-hr O33 081507 081507
Max 8-hr OMax 8-hr O33 081507 081507Eder et al. 2008Eder et al. 2008
Fraction Correct: 0.92
7
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1-Jun 8-Jun 15-Jun 22-Jun 29-Jun 6-Jul 13-Jul 20-Jul 27-JulDay
Hit Accuracy
Target
Fraction Correct
Progress from 2005 to 2007:Progress from 2005 to 2007:Ozone Prediction Summary VerificationOzone Prediction Summary Verification
Fraction Correct, 2006: 3X 8-hr avg 0.9960.9760.994 0.976 0.985
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
5/1/2006 5/31/2006 6/30/2006 7/30/2006 8/29/2006 9/28/2006Day
Fraction Correct
Target
Monthly Cum
2005
Experimental, Eastern US
Approved 8/05 to replace IOC (NE US) in operations
2006
Operational, Eastern US
Experimental Domain: Daily Verification: 8-hr Avg Full EUS Domain 2005
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct
Fraction Correct
Target
2005
Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
Operational, NE US Domain
Operational
Operational
Experimental
Fraction Correct, 2007: 5X 8-hr avg for CONUS
0.985
0.9640.981
0.998
0.976
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
5/1/07 5/15/07 5/29/07 6/12/07 6/26/07 7/10/07 7/24/07 8/7/07 8/21/07 9/4/07 9/18/07
Fraction Correct
Target
Monthly Cum
2007
Experimental, Contiguous US
Approved 9/07 to replace Eastern US config in operations
Experimental
CONUSCONUS
EUSEUS
EUSEUS
NEUSNEUS
8
Progress from 2007 to 2008:Progress from 2007 to 2008:CONUS OCONUS O3 3 Prediction Summary Verification Prediction Summary Verification
2008
CONUS, wrt 85ppb Threshold JJA: 0.980
Operational
Fraction Correct, 2007: 5X 8-hr avg for CONUS
0.985
0.9640.981
0.998
0.976
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
5/1/07 5/15/07 5/29/07 6/12/07 6/26/07 7/10/07 7/24/07 8/7/07 8/21/07 9/4/07 9/18/07
Fraction Correct
Target
Monthly Cum
2007
Contiguous US (CONUS) Implemented 9/07 to replace Eastern US config in operations JJA: 0.974
Experimental
CONUSCONUS
OPNL Predictions Fraction Correct, from 4/08: 5X 8-hr avg CONUS 85 ppb THRESHOLD
0.9790.987
0.9970.999 0.975
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
4/1/08 4/16/08 5/1/08 5/16/08 5/31/08 6/15/08 6/30/08 7/15/08 7/30/08 8/14/08 8/29/08
Fraction Correct 85ppb
Monthly Cum 85-Threshold
Target
CONUSCONUS
9
Prediction Accuracy and Ozone Thresholds Prediction Accuracy and Ozone Thresholds
Effect on FC: moderate reduction Effect on FC: moderate reduction
Fraction Correct, from 4/08: 5X 8-hr avg CONUS 85 and 76 ppb THRESHOLDS
0.947
0.932
0.960
0.9790.987
0.987 0.989
0.9750.999 0.997
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
4/1/2008 4/16/2008 5/1/2008 5/16/2008 5/31/2008 6/15/2008 6/30/2008 7/15/2008 7/30/2008 8/14/2008 8/29/2008
Fraction Correct 85ppb
Fraction Correct 75ppb
Monthly Cum 75-Threshold
Monthly Cum 85-Threshold
Target
10
Smoke Predictions Summary: Smoke Predictions Summary: Warm Season, 2007 and 2008Warm Season, 2007 and 2008
Threat Scores, 2007: Smoke Column > 1 microgam/m3
0.177
0.099
0.280
0.082
0.150
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
4/1/07 4/15/07 4/29/07 5/13/07 5/27/07 6/10/07 6/24/07 7/8/07 7/22/07 8/5/07 8/19/07 9/2/07
Threat Score
Target
Monthly Cum
Fraction Correct, 2007: Smoke Column > 1 microgam/m3
0.755
0.798
0.848
0.780
0.783
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
4/1/07 4/15/07 4/29/07 5/13/07 5/27/07 6/10/07 6/24/07 7/8/07 7/22/07 8/5/07 8/19/07 9/2/07
Fraction CorrectFC Target: O3 Predictions
Monthly Cum
• FC generally > 0.7
• FC Target not established for qualitative smoke tool
• Based on satellite AOD; column verification only
• TS cum = 0.159; Target = 0.08 (Column verification)
Fraction Correct, 2008: Smoke Column > 1 microgram/m3
0.643
0.770
0.658
0.694
0.716
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
4/1/08 5/1/08 5/31/08 6/30/08 7/30/08 8/29/08
Fraction CorrectFC Target: O3 Predictions
Monthly Cum
• TS cum = 0.133
20072007
• FC generally > 0.6
Threat Scores, 2008: Smoke Column > 1 microgram/m3 Season: 0.133
0.157
0.143
0.143
0.106
0.135
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
4/1/08 5/1/08 5/31/08 6/30/08 7/30/08 8/29/08
Threat ScoreTargetMonthly Cum
20082008
11
Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Experimental TestingExperimental Testing
Experimental Predictions
Publicly available, real-time
Ozone:
CMAQ with advanced gas-phase chemical mechanism CB05
– more comprehensive Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) reactions
– challenge: more O3 with CB05
– regional implications: CA, NE US
Smoke:
Testing over AK domain
– new GOES-W smoke verification in development
– challenge: little fire activity in 2008
weather.gov/aq-exprweather.gov/aq-expr weather.gov/aqweather.gov/aq
ExperimentalExperimental OperationalOperational
12
Fraction Correct, Ozone Predictions, 1200 UTCDaily Maximum of 8-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=85 ppb
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
14-Jun 21-Jun 28-Jun 5-Jul 12-Jul 19-Jul 26-Jul 2-Aug 9-Aug 16-Aug 23-Aug 30-Aug 6-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Experimental vs. Operational OExperimental vs. Operational O33 at 85 ppb at 85 ppb
Experimental vs Operational, 85ppb: Experimental vs Operational, 85ppb: FC decreases in exptl predictionsFC decreases in exptl predictions
OPNL Predictions Fraction Correct, from 4/08: 5X 8-hr avg CONUS 85 ppb THRESHOLD
0.9790.987
0.9970.999 0.975
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
4/1/08 4/16/08 5/1/08 5/16/08 5/31/08 6/15/08 6/30/08 7/15/08 7/30/08 8/14/08 8/29/08
Fraction Correct 85ppb
Monthly Cum 85-Threshold
Target
OperationalOperational
ExperimentalExperimental
13
Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Real-time Testing, Summer 2008: Experimental vs Operational OExperimental vs Operational O33 at 76 ppb at 76 ppb
Experimental vs. Operational, 76 ppb: Experimental vs. Operational, 76 ppb: FC decreases in exptl predictionsFC decreases in exptl predictions
OPNL Predictions Fraction Correct, from 4/08: 5X 8-hr avg CONUS 76 ppb THRESHOLD
0.947
0.932
0.9600.987 0.989
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
4/1/08 4/16/08 5/1/08 5/16/08 5/31/08 6/15/08 6/30/08 7/15/08 7/30/08 8/14/08 8/29/08
Fraction Correct 75ppb
Monthly Cum 75-Threshold
Target
OperationalOperational
Fraction Correct, Ozone Predictions, 1200 UTCDaily Maximum of 8-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=76 ppb
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
14-Jun 21-Jun 28-Jun 5-Jul 12-Jul 19-Jul 26-Jul 2-Aug 9-Aug 16-Aug 23-Aug 30-Aug 6-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
ExperimentalExperimental
14
Developmental Testing, Summer 2008Developmental Testing, Summer 2008
Developmental Predictions: Focus group access only, real-time as
resources permit
Real-time Testing, Aerosols from NEI sources:
CMAQ, Gas-phase CB05 June 10 aerosol chemical reactions
(AERO-4) with heterogeneous pathways
sea salt emissions and chemistry included in aerosol module
Expanded domains: HI smoke Exploring HI, AK ozone Developmental
CB-05CB-05
fine particles
PM2.5
15
Developmental Aerosol Predictions: Developmental Aerosol Predictions: Summary Verification, 2008Summary Verification, 2008
August 17, 2007 August 16, 2008
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTC
Daily Maximum of 1-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=40 mg/m3
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
7-Jan
14-Jan
21-Jan
28-Jan
4-Feb
11-Feb
18-Feb
25-Feb
3-Mar
10-Mar
17-Mar
24-Mar
31-Mar
7-Apr
14-Apr
21-Apr
28-Apr
5-May
12-May
19-May
26-May
2-Jun
9-Jun
16-Jun
23-Jun
30-Jun
7-Jul
14-Jul
21-Jul
28-Jul
4-Aug
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
Emissions Correction
16
Aerosol Summary: 2008Aerosol Summary: 2008
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTC
Daily Maximum of 1-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=40 mg/m3
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
7-Jan
14-Jan
21-Jan
28-Jan
4-Feb
11-Feb
18-Feb
25-Feb
3-Mar
10-Mar
17-Mar
24-Mar
31-Mar
7-Apr
14-Apr
21-Apr
28-Apr
5-May
12-May
19-May
26-May
2-Jun
9-Jun
16-Jun
23-Jun
30-Jun
7-Jul
14-Jul
21-Jul
28-Jul
4-Aug
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTC
Daily Maximum of 1-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=35 mg/m3
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
7-Jan
14-Jan
21-Jan
28-Jan
4-Feb
11-Feb
18-Feb
25-Feb
3-Mar
10-Mar
17-Mar
24-Mar
31-Mar
7-Apr
14-Apr
21-Apr
28-Apr
5-May
12-May
19-May
26-May
2-Jun
9-Jun
16-Jun
23-Jun
30-Jun
7-Jul
14-Jul
21-Jul
28-Jul
4-Aug
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
Lower thresholdLower threshold
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTC
Daily Maximum of 24-h Running Average, Full 5X Domain, Th=40 mg/m3
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
7-Jan
14-Jan
21-Jan
28-Jan
4-Feb
11-Feb
18-Feb
25-Feb
3-Mar
10-Mar
17-Mar
24-Mar
31-Mar
7-Apr
14-Apr
21-Apr
28-Apr
5-May
12-May
19-May
26-May
2-Jun
9-Jun
16-Jun
23-Jun
30-Jun
7-Jul
14-Jul
21-Jul
28-Jul
4-Aug
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
17
Partnering with AQ ForecastersPartnering with AQ Forecasters
Focus group of state and local AQ Focus group of state and local AQ forecasters:forecasters:• Participate in real-time developmental testing of Participate in real-time developmental testing of
new capabilities, e.g. aerosol predictionsnew capabilities, e.g. aerosol predictions
• Provide feedback on reliability, utility of test Provide feedback on reliability, utility of test productsproducts
• Emphasize local episodes/case studiesEmphasize local episodes/case studies
• Meet regularly to examine test predictions, Meet regularly to examine test predictions, discuss feedback, potential improvementsdiscuss feedback, potential improvements
• Work together with EPA’s AIRNow & NOAAWork together with EPA’s AIRNow & NOAA
Forecaster Coordination:Forecaster Coordination:• WFO and NCEP/HPC forecasters provide WFO and NCEP/HPC forecasters provide
weather information for partner AQ forecastersweather information for partner AQ forecasters– Web-site for AQ forecasters, interactive discussion on Web-site for AQ forecasters, interactive discussion on
event-driven basisevent-driven basis
PHL O3 and aerosol predictions -- Ryan, 2008
Experimental Ozone Guidance, 6/17 -9/10, 1200 UTC
Observed Mean: 64.5 ppbv
Operational Bias: +4.8 ppbvExperimental Bias: +8.3 ppbv
Increased over-prediction consistent day-to-day as weather conditions changed.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
7/12
7/19
7/26
8/2 8/98/1
68/2
38/3
09/6
Date (2008)
PM
2.5
24
-h A
vera
ge
(m
icro
g/m
3)
OBS?
EXPR
Developmental aerosol guidance, 7/12 -9/10, 1200 UTC
Daily 24-hr max
19
National Air Quality Forecast CapabilityNational Air Quality Forecast CapabilityLooking AheadLooking Ahead
Nationwide ozone and particulate Nationwide ozone and particulate matter predictionsmatter predictions
• Expanding ozone & smoke to Expanding ozone & smoke to nationwide coverage, Target: FY10 nationwide coverage, Target: FY10 and and
• Begin quantitative particulate Begin quantitative particulate matter predictions, Target: FY14matter predictions, Target: FY14
•Providing information Nationwide on when/where poor AQ is expected Providing information Nationwide on when/where poor AQ is expected
•Reducing losses to life (50,000) each year from poor AQ Reducing losses to life (50,000) each year from poor AQ
•Reducing economic losses ($150B each year) from poor AQReducing economic losses ($150B each year) from poor AQ
20
National AQF Capability:National AQF Capability:Next StepsNext Steps
Developing Particulate matter components:Developing Particulate matter components:
• Smoke from large fires: experimental testing in AK, HISmoke from large fires: experimental testing in AK, HI
• Components for quantitative PM forecast capability:Components for quantitative PM forecast capability:
– Objective satellite products for verification (ongoing)Objective satellite products for verification (ongoing)
– Aerosols predictions from anthropogenic source emissions in inventories: continued Aerosols predictions from anthropogenic source emissions in inventories: continued development/testing/analysis– testing advanced chemical mechanismsdevelopment/testing/analysis– testing advanced chemical mechanisms
– Further component development, chemical data assimilation, dust, speciated fire emissions, Further component development, chemical data assimilation, dust, speciated fire emissions, “in-line” coupling of weather and AQ simulation“in-line” coupling of weather and AQ simulation
– Developmental and experimental testing, integrated quantitative PM capability Developmental and experimental testing, integrated quantitative PM capability
– Target operational implementation for initial PM forecasts, NE US: FY14Target operational implementation for initial PM forecasts, NE US: FY14
Expanding, Improving Ozone forecast guidanceExpanding, Improving Ozone forecast guidance
• Closer coupling of AQ with NAM; treatments/resolution, horizontal boundary Closer coupling of AQ with NAM; treatments/resolution, horizontal boundary conditions…conditions…
• Development of AK, HI capabilities; target operational implementation in FY10Development of AK, HI capabilities; target operational implementation in FY10
• Extend forecast range to Day 2 and beyondExtend forecast range to Day 2 and beyond
21
Acknowledgments:Acknowledgments: AQF Implementation Team Members AQF Implementation Team Members
OCWWSOCWWS Jannie Ferrell Jannie Ferrell Outreach, FeedbackOutreach, Feedback
OCIO OCIO Cindy Cromwell, Allan Darling, Bob BungeCindy Cromwell, Allan Darling, Bob Bunge Data CommunicationsData Communications
OST/MDL OST/MDL Jerry Gorline Jerry Gorline Dev. VerificationDev. Verification
OST/MDLOST/MDL Marc Saccucci, Tim Boyer, Dave RuthMarc Saccucci, Tim Boyer, Dave Ruth NDGD Product DevelopmentNDGD Product DevelopmentOSTOST Ken Carey, Ivanka StajnerKen Carey, Ivanka Stajner Program SupportProgram Support
NESDIS/NCDCNESDIS/NCDC Alan HallAlan Hall Product ArchivingProduct Archiving
NOAA/OARNOAA/OAR Jim MeagherJim Meagher NOAA AQ Matrix ManagerNOAA AQ Matrix Manager
NCEPNCEPJeff McQueen, Pius Lee, Marina Tsidulko, Youhua Tang,Jeff McQueen, Pius Lee, Marina Tsidulko, Youhua Tang, EMC AQF model interface development, testing and integration EMC AQF model interface development, testing and integration
Ho-Chun Huang, Dongchul Kim Ho-Chun Huang, Dongchul Kim *Sarah Lu *Sarah Lu Global data assimilation and feedback testing (NASA, NESDIS)Global data assimilation and feedback testing (NASA, NESDIS)*Brad Ferrier, *Dan Johnson, *Eric Rogers, *Hui-Ya Chuang*Brad Ferrier, *Dan Johnson, *Eric Rogers, *Hui-Ya Chuang WRF/NAM coordinationWRF/NAM coordinationGeoff ManikinGeoff Manikin Smoke Product testing and integrationSmoke Product testing and integrationJohn Ward, Brent Gordon, Chris MageeJohn Ward, Brent Gordon, Chris Magee NCO transition and systems testingNCO transition and systems testingRobert Kelly, Bob Bodner, Andrew OrrisonRobert Kelly, Bob Bodner, Andrew Orrison HPC coordination and AQF webdrawerHPC coordination and AQF webdrawer
* Guest Contributors* Guest Contributors
NOAA/OARNOAA/OARDaewon Byun, Shaocai Yu, Daiwen Kang, Hsin-Mu Lin, Daewon Byun, Shaocai Yu, Daiwen Kang, Hsin-Mu Lin, CMAQ development, adaptation of AQ simulations for AQFCMAQ development, adaptation of AQ simulations for AQF
David Wong, Daniel Tong, Tianfeng ChaiDavid Wong, Daniel Tong, Tianfeng ChaiRoland Draxler, Glenn Rolph, Ariel SteinRoland Draxler, Glenn Rolph, Ariel Stein HYSPLIT adaptationsHYSPLIT adaptations
NOAA/NESDISNOAA/NESDISShobha Kondragunta, Jian ZengShobha Kondragunta, Jian Zeng Smoke Verification product developmentSmoke Verification product developmentMatt Seybold, Mark RuminskiMatt Seybold, Mark Ruminski HMS product integration with smoke forecast toolHMS product integration with smoke forecast tool
EPA/OAQPSEPA/OAQPSChet Wayland, Phil Dickerson, Scott Jackson, Brad JohnsChet Wayland, Phil Dickerson, Scott Jackson, Brad Johns AIRNow development, coordination with NAQFCAIRNow development, coordination with NAQFC
EPA/ORDEPA/ORDRohit Mathur, Ken Schere, Jon Pleim, Tanya Otte, Rohit Mathur, Ken Schere, Jon Pleim, Tanya Otte, CMAQ development, adaptation of AQ simulations for AQFCMAQ development, adaptation of AQ simulations for AQF
Jeff Young, George Pouliot, Brian Eder Jeff Young, George Pouliot, Brian Eder
22
Operational AQ forecast guidanceOperational AQ forecast guidancewww.weather.gov/aqwww.weather.gov/aq
Further information: Further information: www.nws.noaa.gov/ost/air_qualitywww.nws.noaa.gov/ost/air_quality
Smoke ProductsSmoke ProductsImplemented March, 2007Implemented March, 2007
CONUS Ozone CONUS Ozone Expansion Implemented September, 2007Expansion Implemented September, 2007
23
AppendixAppendix
24
Updates in 2008Updates in 2008Operational ProductsOperational Products
WRF update (March, 2008)WRF update (March, 2008)– Size: Expanded domain by 18%
– Model Parameterizations: Implemented gravity wave mountain drag parameterization, modified horizontal advection for better mass conservation, Improved surface longwave radiation calculation, Improved soil moisture calculations OCONUS
– Data assimilation: Upgraded GSI with NMM bkgd error covariances, more satellite obs
Ozone Predictions: Emissions Updates (May, 2008)Ozone Predictions: Emissions Updates (May, 2008)– Point, area and mobile source emissions: updated based on NEI (2005) and projected for
the current year. • EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality on-road emissions estimates
• EGU sources: 2006 CEM data projected for 2008.
– Biogenic sources: updated with BEIS 3.13
Smoke Predictions (December, 2007):Smoke Predictions (December, 2007):– Increased vertical resolution: now at full NAM 60-layer resolution– Increased computational efficiency, faster product delivery
25
Continuing Science UpgradesContinuing Science UpgradesImprovements to the expanding NAQFCImprovements to the expanding NAQFC
Continuing R&D requiredContinuing R&D required
• OAR and EPA working actively with NWS to provide prototype capabilities for pre-operational OAR and EPA working actively with NWS to provide prototype capabilities for pre-operational development, testing experimental production, and implementationdevelopment, testing experimental production, and implementation
Assuring quality with science peer reviews:Assuring quality with science peer reviews:
• Design review of major system upgrades (initial, yearly upgrades) Design review of major system upgrades (initial, yearly upgrades)
• Diagnostic evaluations with field campaigns and evaluationsDiagnostic evaluations with field campaigns and evaluations
• Publication of T&E in peer-reviewed literature Publication of T&E in peer-reviewed literature
Ozone CapabilityOzone Capability
– Otte et al. Weather and Forecasting, 20, 367-385 (2005) Otte et al. Weather and Forecasting, 20, 367-385 (2005)
– Lee et al., J Applied Meteorology and Climatology, in press (2007)Lee et al., J Applied Meteorology and Climatology, in press (2007)
– Mckeen et al., J. Geophys. Res. 110, D21307 (2005)Mckeen et al., J. Geophys. Res. 110, D21307 (2005)
– Yu, et al. , J. Geophys. Res. (2007)Yu, et al. , J. Geophys. Res. (2007)
Smoke ToolSmoke Tool
– Prados et al., J. Geophys. Res. 112, D15201 (2007)Prados et al., J. Geophys. Res. 112, D15201 (2007)
– Kondragunta et al., submitted for publication Kondragunta et al., submitted for publication
– Rolph et al., submitted for publicationRolph et al., submitted for publication
– Zeng and Kondragunta, ms. in preparationZeng and Kondragunta, ms. in preparation
– Ruminski, Kondragunta, Draxler and Zeng, in preparationRuminski, Kondragunta, Draxler and Zeng, in preparation
26
National Air Quality Forecast CapabilityNational Air Quality Forecast CapabilityMajor Components: IOCMajor Components: IOC
NWP ModelNWP Model
NAM/Eta-12NAM/Eta-12
NOAA/NWSNOAA/NWS
AQ Module: AQ Module:
Emissions Preprocessor Emissions Preprocessor
PREMAQPREMAQ
NOAA/OARNOAA/OAR and and EPA/ORDEPA/ORD
AQ Module: AQ Module:
Air Quality Reactive TransportAir Quality Reactive Transport
CMAQCMAQ
NOAA/OARNOAA/OAR and and EPA/ORDEPA/ORD
Weather Weather
ObservationsObservations
EPA’s National EPA’s National
Emissions Inventory:Emissions Inventory:
EPA/OAQPSEPA/OAQPS
IT /CommsIT /Comms
NOAA/NWS NOAA/NWS
andand
EPA/OAQPSEPA/OAQPS
NWP Post-processorsNWP Post-processors
for AQ Modulesfor AQ Modules
27
Smoke Forecast Tool: Smoke Forecast Tool: What is it?What is it?
OverviewOverview • Passive transport/dispersion computed with HYSPLIT & WRF-NAM (or GFS, Passive transport/dispersion computed with HYSPLIT & WRF-NAM (or GFS,
OCONUS). 24-hr spin-up, 48-hour prediction made daily with 6Z cycleOCONUS). 24-hr spin-up, 48-hour prediction made daily with 6Z cycle
Fire LocationsFire Locations• NESDIS/HMS: Filtered ABBA product (only fires with observed associated NESDIS/HMS: Filtered ABBA product (only fires with observed associated
smoke)smoke)
EmissionsEmissions• USFS’ BlueSky algorithm for emitted PM2.5 USFS’ BlueSky algorithm for emitted PM2.5
Smoke Transport/dispersionSmoke Transport/dispersion• HYSPLIT (Lagrangian); plume rise based on combustion heat and HYSPLIT (Lagrangian); plume rise based on combustion heat and
meteorologymeteorology
VerificationVerification• Based on satellite imagery for footprint of extent of observed smoke in Based on satellite imagery for footprint of extent of observed smoke in
atmospheric column exceeding threshold of detectionatmospheric column exceeding threshold of detection
28
Smoke Forecast ToolSmoke Forecast ToolMajor ComponentsMajor Components
NWP ModelNWP Model
NAM/WRF-NMMNAM/WRF-NMM
NOAA/NWSNOAA/NWS
HYSPLIT Module: HYSPLIT Module:
NOAA/OARNOAA/OAR
Weather Weather
ObservationsObservations
USFS’s BlueSky USFS’s BlueSky
Emissions Inventory:Emissions Inventory:
USFS USFS
NWP Post-processorsNWP Post-processors
for AQ Modulesfor AQ Modules
NESDIS HMSNESDIS HMS
Fire LocationsFire Locations
Verification: Verification: NESDIS/GASP SmokeNESDIS/GASP Smoke
29
New Threshold and FCNew Threshold and FC
Miss at Lower Miss at Lower ThresholdThreshold
Mis
s a
t M
iss
at
Lo
we
r L
ow
er
Th
resh
old
Th
resh
old
GoodGood
GoodGoodMissMiss
MissMiss
FC decrease FC decrease
FC increaseFC increase
Pre
dic
tio
n
Pre
dic
tio
n
Observation Observation
Go
od
at
Go
od
at
Lo
we
r L
ow
er
Th
resh
old
Th
resh
old
Good at Lower Good at Lower ThresholdThreshold
GoodGood
Pred = Obs
Pred = Obs
New
Th
resh
old
New
Th
resh
old
Old
Th
resh
old
Old
Th
resh
old
30
Developmental Aerosol Predictions: Developmental Aerosol Predictions: Summary Verification, 2007-2008Summary Verification, 2007-2008
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTCDaily Maximum of 1-h Avg, Full 5X Domain
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
18-Jun
25-Jun
2-Jul
9-Jul
16-Jul
23-Jul
30-Jul
6-Aug
13-Aug
20-Aug
27-Aug
Hit Accuracy
Target20072007
Fraction Correct, Aerosol Predictions, 0600 UTC
Daily Maximum of 1-h avg, Full 5X Domain, Th=40 mg/m3
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
7-Jan
14-Jan
21-Jan
28-Jan
4-Feb
11-Feb
18-Feb
25-Feb
3-Mar
10-Mar
17-Mar
24-Mar
31-Mar
7-Apr
14-Apr
21-Apr
28-Apr
5-May
12-May
19-May
26-May
2-Jun
9-Jun
16-Jun
23-Jun
30-Jun
7-Jul
14-Jul
21-Jul
28-Jul
4-Aug
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
Fraction Correct
Target
Emissions Correction
20082008
31
Daily Aerosol VerificationDaily Aerosol VerificationMarch 5 – 20, 2008March 5 – 20, 2008
Note: sudden improvement from March 16Note: sudden improvement from March 16