1- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Introduction to the X-rayAbsorption Spectroscopy
(XAS)
Dr. Francesco d’Acapito
INFM-OGG c/o GILDA CRG -ESRFBP-220 F-38043 Grenoble (France)
2- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Synchrotron Radiation Sources
Location of the different sources in the tunnel
Emission from a bending magnet
Emission from an insertion device
Comparison between the brlliance of undulators and wigglers.
3- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
The GILDA Beamlinehttp://www.esrf.fr/exp_facilities/BM8/handbook/handbook.htm
BM8 at ESRF
Energy range5-70 KeVFlux on the sample108 - 1010 ph/s
Beam size on the sample2 mmEnergy Resolution∆E/E ≈ 10-4
CrystalsSi (311), Si(511)
Energy range
22.9
m
24.2
m
25.2
m
26.2
m
27.9
m
28.5
m
29.1
m
5 cm31
.0 m
33.0
m
32.0
m
35.3
75 m
WALL
SIDE VIEW
2nd MIRROR CHAMBER
FLOOR
COOLED
SLITS
FILTER
HOLDERWHITE BEAM
POSITION MONITOR BERYLLIUM
WINDOWBEAM POSITION
MONITORBERYLLIUM
WINDOW1° EXPERIMENTAL HUTCH
MONOCHROMATOR
COOLED
BERYLLIUM
WINDOW
SECONDARY
BEAM STOPPERMONOCHROMATIC
BEAM POSITION
MONITOR
COOLED
BERYLLIUM
WINDOW
1st MIRROR CHAMBER
14501400
γ φ
θ2 (α)
second crystal
first crystal
sample
θ1
ESRF
2 α = 3.6 mrad (Mot + piézo)
(Moteur)
4- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
EXAFS HUTCH
Helium Cryostat
0
Ion Chamber2nd Ion
Chamber
EXAFS REFLEXAFS
2nd Slit + Norm. diode Refl. diode
Hp- Ge fluo detector
1st slit
Collection modes• Transmission(Concentrated samples)
• Fluorescence(Diluted samples)
• Total & Partial electron Yield• Total reflection
• Optical luminescenceDetectors• Ion Chambers
• 13 element High purity Ge• Electron multiplier
• Si PIN diodesAncillary equipment• Criostat/oven (77<T<500 K)
• Liquid He criostat (4<T<300 K)• 1T Magnet
5- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Sam
ple1 st Ionization cham
ber2nd Ionization C
hamber
X-ray B
eam
I1 = I0 * exp (-µ x)
µ = -ln (I1/I0)
I0I1
Measuring the X
-ray absorption coefficient
6- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Ionized state
Continuum
X-ray
fluorescence
Auger
electron Y
ield
Fluorescence
Experim
ental apparatus
Sam
ple
Ion Cham
ber
X-ray or E
lectron D
etector
X-ray
Beam
= electron
= H
ole
Indirect methods
7- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
40200404004060040800410004120041400
Sa
mp
le A
bso
rptio
n (A
rb.U
n.)
Energy (eV)
Absorption spectrum of Crystalline CeO2Absorption Spectrum of gaseous Kr
General Features:I) Chemical Selective
II) Information about the local structure
Information provided(for the first coordination shells)
I) Nearest neighbor nature and number ( ±0.5)II) Interatomic distances ( ± 0.02 Å)Debye-Waller Factors σ2 (± 10%)
8- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
EXAFS Theory
Absorption Coefficient µ from the Fermi Golden Rule
µ = < i | p ⋅A | f >2
<i| = <1s|, <2s|, <2p1/2|, <2p3/2|< f | isolated atom = e-i k r
k r Yl, m
< fatom in a cluster | = ?
= Absorbing Atom
= Backscattering Atom
R
Definition of the oscillatory function χ
χ = µ - µatomic
µatomic
EXAFS formula
χ = 3 S02Nj
k Rj2 Ak,Rj sin 2kRj + ϕk,Rj + 2δck ∑j
e-2k2σ2 e-2Rj / λ e⋅Rj
2
9- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Amplitude of the backscattered electron wave
r
Ri
= Absorber
= Backscatterer
ê
Theta
ei∂ eikr
kr cos θ
Ri
ei∂ eikRi
kRi cos θ
r'
Ri
ei∂ eikRi
kRi cos θ T(k) eiβ eikr
kr
Ri
ei 2kRi + 2∂ + β
kRi2 cos θ T(k)
10- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
General formulation
Green function formalism
σ = σat Im1sin
2δL0
0 12 L0 + 1
T I-GT-1
L0,L0
0,0∑m0
≈ σat Im1sin
2δL0
0 12 L0 + 1
T GTn
L0,L0
0,0∑m0 ∑n
T= Atomic Scattering MatrixG= Propagator matrix
T =
t000t1
00
00tn
G =
0G0,1G1,00
G0,N-1G1,N-1
GN-1,0GN-1,10
TL, L'i, j
= δi, j δL, L' expi∂il sin∂i
l
GL, L'i, j
= δij 4π 2l+1 2l'+1 ×
× 2l''+1 l l' l''0 0 0 l l' l''
m -m' m'-m -1m'
il'+1
hl''+ kRij Yl'', m'-mRij ∑L''
The scattering cross section σ can be approximated by the so-called Multiple Scattering serie
made up of terms like:
Single Scattering (SS)
0
i
T0G0, iTiGi, 0T0
Multiple Scattering (MS)
(double scattering)
0
i
jT0G0, iTiGi, jTjGj, 0T0
Full Multiple Scattering
(FMS)
All possible pathsTI - GTL0, L0
0, 0
11- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
A FMS-MS-SS investigation: the structure of theCu+(CO)3 complex
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
8800890090009100920093009400
Ab
sorp
tion
coe
fficien
t µ (Arb
. Un
its)
Energy (eV)
FMS
MS and SS
O
CuC
Cu+(CO)3 complex
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
2345678910
Cu - CCu - OCu - C - O
Simexpres
EX
AF
S sp
ectra
χ(k)
Electron wavenumber k (Å-1
)
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
-101234
Experimental3042547090
En (Ry)
Ab
sorp
tion
Co
efficie
nt (A
rb.U
nits)
Contribution to the total EXAFS signal:
Cu-C SS; Cu-O SS; Cu-C-O MS.
Quantitative analysis
NCu-CO = 3 ± 0.3
RCu-C = 1.93 ± 0.02 Å
RC-O = 1.12 ± 0.03 Å
ΘCu-CO = 180 ±5 deg
FMS simulation of the XANES region for
different alpha angle values
30<alpha<90 deg
z
x,y plane
12- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Example of a quantitative EXAFS analysis.
Determination of the Cu-Cu distance in the Cu 2O compound
Recall of the EXAFS formula in the single scattering framework
χ = 3 S02Nj
k Rj2 Ak,Rj sin 2kRj + ϕk,Rj + 2δck ∑j
e-2k2σ2 e-2Rj / λ e⋅Rj
2
The analysis method:
1) Evaluation of the amplitude Ã(k, Rj)S02A(k, Rj) exp(-2Rj/λ)
and phase P(k, Rj)[φ(k, Rj) + 2δc(k)]
terms from a compound with known structural parameters
2) Use of the cited terms in the determination of N j, σj and Rj of the
unknown compound.
13- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Extraction of the EXAFS signal
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
108001100011200114001160011800120001220012400
Ab
sorp
tion
Co
efficie
nt (A
rb.U
nits)
Energy (eV)
Jp
Step 1 Background subtraction &normalization
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
01234567
MO
du
lus o
f the
Fo
urie
r Tra
nsfo
rm (A
rb. U
nits)
r (Å)
Transformation Window
Step 3 Isolation of the interestingpeak by back-transform
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
05101520
χ (k)
k (Å-1
)
Transformation Window
Step 2 Fourier Filtering of thespectrum
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
05101520
Filte
red
χ(k
)
k (Å-1
)
Step 4 fit to a model
14- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Sample description
The model compound
Metallic Cu foil
Structurefcc1st shell nearest neighbours N:12 Cu
1st shell Cu- Cu distance R:2.5561 Å1st shell Debye-Waller factor σ
(77K)0.057 Å
The 'unknown' compound
Crystalline Cu2O powder
1st shell nearest neighbours:2 O1st shell Cu - O distance:1.85 Å
2nd shell nearest neighbours:12 Cu2nd shell Cu - Cu distance:3.019 Å
we will use the backscattering parameters of the Cu foil to extract the Cu-Cu distance in the oxide.
15- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Experimental setup
Sample Ic 0 Ic 1
Sample
Ic 0
X-ray or Electron Detector
a) Transmission Modeb) Fluorescence (or Electron detection) Mode
Ic0 filled with 1000 mbar N2 Absorption =8%Ic1 filled with 300 mbar Ar Absorption = 80%
Samples at Liquid Nitrogen Temperature
Energy scan details
fixed energy step scan0.025 Å-1≤ ∆k ≤ 0.05 Å-1
Pre-edgeEdge -200 eV
Edge1st zoneEdge +100 eV
2 zoneEdge +400 eV
3 zonekmax=15Å-1
8800 eV8970 eV9010 eV9079 eV9379 eV9840 eV10 eV0.5 eV1 eV2 eV4 eV17 pts80 pts69 pts150 pts115 pts
3 s3 s3 s3 s3 s
16- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Sample preparation
General rules:µtot < 2.5∆µCu≈1
Fundamental steps1) Find the weight fraction of the components:Cu2O: Mw= 2* 63.54 + 16 = 143.08 g/MolWt%Cu = 2*63.54/143.08 = 88.81 %Wt%O = 16/143.08 = 11.18 %
2) Read the absortion cross sections on tablesσ8978Cu = 36.1 cm2/gσ8980Cu = 287.2 cm2/g
σ8980O = 7.5 cm2/g
3) Calculate the sample weight for ∆µ=1 (typical S=1cm2 pellet)∆µCu = ∆σCu [cm2/g] * δCu [g/cm2]δCu = ∆µCu /∆σCu = 1/ (287.2 - 36.1) = 3.98 mgCu/cm2
Powder weight PP= δCu * S / Wt%Cu = 3.98e-3 * 1 / 0.8881 = 4.48 mgCu2O
δO = P * Wt%O / S= 0.5 mgO/cm2
4) Check if the total µ<2.5µ = σ8980Cu * δCu + σ8980O * δO = 1.143 + 0.0037 = 1.147
Your 4.5 mg/cm2 pellet is O.K.
17- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
The absorption spectra:
8731.42 8988.23 9245.03 9501.84 9758.6510015.45
-1.20000
-.900000
-.600000
-.300000
.000000
.300000
.600000
Metallic CuE (ev)
µ(E)
8918.06 9089.57 9261.07 9432.57 9604.07 9775.57 9947.07
-1.20000
-.800000
-.400000
.000000
.400000
Crystalline Cu2OE (ev)
µ(E)
18- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Edge analysis
• The edge shape depends on the details of the local geometry around theabsorbing atom.• The edge energy (first inflection point of µ) is related with the valencestate of the absorber.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
89708980899090009010
Cu MetCu2OCuO
No
rma
lized
Ab
sorp
tion
µ (Arb
.Un
.)
Energy (eV)
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
89708980899090009010
Cu2OCu MetCuO
δ µ / δ E
(Arb
.Un
.)
Energy (eV)
8979 eV
8981 eV
8984 eV
19- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
EXAFS signal extraction
8700.00 8800.00 8900.00 9000.00 9100.00 9200.00 9300.00 9400.00 9500.00 9600.00 9700.00 9800.00 9900.00 10000.0 10100.0 10200.0 10300.0 10400.0rame_met1.absE (ev)
µ(E)
Pre-edge subtraction
9000.00 9100.00 9200.00 9300.00 9400.00 9500.00 9600.00 9700.00 9800.00 9900.00 10000.0 10100.0 10200.0 10300.0 10400.0
Atomic backgroundsubtraction
20- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
EXAFS spectra
4.00000 8.00000 12.0000 16.0000
-.900000
-.600000
-.300000
.000000
.300000
.600000
Metallic Cuk (Å-1)
k*khi(k)
4.00000 6.00000 8.00000 10.0000 12.0000 14.0000 16.0000 -.400000
-.200000
.000000
.200000
Crystalline Cu2Ok (Å-1)
k*khi(k)
21- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Fourier Transforms
.000000 2.00000 4.00000 6.00000 8.00000 10.0000
10.0000
20.0000
30.0000
40.0000
50.0000
60.0000
Metallic CuR (Å)
F(R)
.000000 2.00000 4.00000 6.00000 8.00000 10.0000
3.00000
6.00000
9.00000
12.0000
15.0000
Crystalline Cu2OR (Å)
F(R)
Cu - O
Cu - Cu
22- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Calculation of the backscattering parameters
4.00000 8.00000 12.0000 16.0000
-.400000
-.200000
.000000
.200000
.400000
Metallic Cu - 1st shellk (Å-1)
k*khi(k)
23- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
4.00000 8.00000 12.0000 16.0000Amplitude of rame_meta.fouk (Å-1)
A(k)
AmplitudeN = 12R = 2.5561 Åsigma = 0.057 Å
4.00000 8.00000 12.0000 16.0000Phase of rame_meta.fouk (Å-1)
phi(k)
PhaseR = 2.5561 Å
24- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Back-Fourier transforms of the 'unknown' compound
4.00000 6.00000 8.00000 10.0000 12.0000 14.0000 16.0000 -.200000
-.100000
.000000
.100000
Cu2O Cu-O shellk (Å-1)
k*khi(k)
First (Cu-O) shell
4.00000 6.00000 8.00000 10.0000 12.0000 14.0000 16.0000
-.300000
-.200000
-.100000
.000000
.100000
.200000
.300000
Cu2O Cu-Cu shellk (Å-1)
k*khi(k)
Second (Cu-Cu) shell
25- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
The simulation
6.00000 8.00000 10.0000 12.0000
-.20
-.10
.00
.10
.20
Cu2O Simulation of the Cu-Cu shellk (Å-1)
k*khi(k)Fit : 1.252773E-02
Results of the simulation
ParameterValueN12.2 ± 0.5
R (Å)3.03 ± 0.03σ (* 10-2 Å)9.3 ± 2
The results are in agreement with the crystallographic data !
26- F. d’Acapito - HERCULES X
Suggestions for further reading
General papers
P.A.Lee, P.H.Citrin, P.Eisenberger, B.M.Kincaid Rev.Mod. Phys. 53(1981), 769
D.C.Köningsberger “X-ray Absorption”, Edited by D.C.Koningsbergerand R.Prins, John Wiley ans Sons New York 1988
Useful links(analysis programs and recent literature)
FEFF project ($)http://leonardo.phys.washington.edu/
GNXAS Project (no $)http://gnxas.unicam.it/
EXAFS analysis programs ($ and no $)http://www.esrf.fr/computing/scientific/exafs/