Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nathaniel-stennett |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
FAB CE Feasibility Study
Operations
FAB CE Stakeholders Workshop
March 5th 2008, Prague
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 2
2
FAB CE
Introduction Key results
Airspace Concept Civil/Military Contingency
Content
Conclusions
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 3
3
FAB CE FAB Development Process
Assumptions:
1. Airspace (7States)
2. Route Network (RNDSG 2010+)
3. Common understanding
OPERATIONAL CONCEPT
DOCUMENTVolume I
Initial Airspace Design
WG2
OPS WG AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY
WG3
WG4
WG5
WG6
OPERATIONAL CONCEPT
DOCUMENTVolume II
Sector Families
SectorGroups
TIME
FIN WG
Master Plan
TEC WG
HR WG
ILR WG
SAF WG
FAB Scenarios
CBA
SAF CASE
constraints
Master Plan
OPSScenarios
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 4
4
FAB CE OPS Concept evolution
CONCEPT ALIGNMENT
2009 2015 2020+
Based on•FAB Static and Dynamic ScenariosMain driver:
•Business and TechnologyAlignment with:
•SESAR LT Concept•Expectations FABCE partners•Industry standards
Based on•FAB Static and Dynamic ScenariosMain driver:•Strategic ATM business objectives •Operational performance included SAFETYAlignment with:•ECIP/LCIP•DMEAN•SESAR MT Concept•Expectations of the FAB partners
Based on• FAB scenario for initial operationsMain driver:• Satisfy SES Req.Alignment with:
• ECIP/LCIP• DMEAN. •Legal [e.g SES]• Expectations of the FAB partners
FAB CE 2015 Concept
Concept for the future [2020+]
Concept for 2009 -> Evolution from
current situation
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 5
5
FAB CE
Proposal 2Load – 01/09/2006, Critical Areas
Current AoRs
Initial Operations
• Small scale cross border operations solving 25 critical areas in upper and lower airspace
• Joint Civil-Military Airspace Co-ordination Body [JCMACB] coordinating airspace use and route network and enabling functional integration of ASM & ATFCM
• Systematic Application of Direct Routes
• Contingency Plan for safety critical situations
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 6
6
FAB CEAirspace
SECTOR Configuration
(SC) EST
SECTOR GROUP (SG)
FAB CE OPS Concept Elements
2015
Elementary SECTOR
(ES) EST
Traffic 2012
Optimized AAS 07
SECTOR FAMILY (SF)
FAMILY GROUP (FG)
Airspace design OPS Scenarios OPS Concept
Sector Family (SF) - areas containing specific air traffic flows and conflict areas which will consist of strongly interdependent elementary sectors.Family Group (FG) - group of Sector Families made along the major traffic flows (minimum FAB)Sector Configuration (SC) – combination of elementary sectors to satisfy operational requirementsSector Group (SG) – includes one Sector Family or more Sector Families to satisfy single sector configuration management (minimum AoR)
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 7
7
FAB CE
Sector Groups (FL285 – FL660)
and Family Groups
Note: FGs borders simplified for purpose of presentations
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 8
8
FAB CESector Groups (GND – FL285)
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 9
9
FAB CEConcept Planning Cycle
State/ANSP/MIL
State/ANSP/MIL
FAB CE
Other Network Stakeholders
State/ANSP/MIL
NO
P
SGs/AoR
sectors
SCP
STATIC AoR:
1 ATSU in 1 SG
Dynamic AoR:
1+n ATSU in 1 SG
Network
FAB CE coordinated
implementation, training,
validation
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 10
10
FAB CEStatic AoR Operations
• Extensive cross border sectorisation with ATM provision for GAT (possibly OAT)
• Sector Configuration Plan (SCP) relating to Sectors Groups which are under the exclusive control of single ATSU
• SCP part of FAB/European NOP valid/updated minimum for a season
• ASM/ATFCM integrated processes involve the different actors (ANSPs, CFMU, Airlines, Authorised Agency and civil/military coordinating bodies)
• FAB AMC(s) (in each FG), ideally combined with FMPs, play a key role in collaborative decision making and in review of the NOP
• Collaborative decision making process from the strategic phase to the executing phase
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 11
11
FAB CEDynamic AoR Operations
• Sector Group involves several ATSUs
• Sector Configuration Plan for several ATSUs relating to Sectors Group as part of FAB/European NOP, valid/updated minimum for a season
• Sector Configuration Management done within a Sector Group
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 12
12
FAB CEDynamic Area of Responsibility Operations
sector 2
ATSUA
ATSUB
ATSUB provides ATS in Sector 3 and 4 as part of SG B (sec 2 + sec 3 + sec 4)
sector 3
ATSUA and ATSUB provide ATS in sector 2 in periods defined by Sector Configuration Plan ATSUB is responsible for Sector Configuration Management in whole SG B including the sec 2
sector 1ATSUA provides ATS in sector 1 as part of the SG A (sec 1)
sector 4
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 13
13
FAB CECivil/Military
Strategic ASM/ATFCM Process
FAB CE Airspace Plan
EUROPEANNATIONAL REGIONAL
Military Airspace
RequirementsFAB CE Member States
Civil Airspace Requirements
FAB CE ANSPs
EUROPEAN BODIES
JCMACBNATIONAL BODIES
Supporting Bureau
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 14
14
FAB CE
FABAMC
Traffic Demand
TRAFFIC DATA
Civil/Military Pre-tactical ASM/ATFCM Process
AUP UUP
ACCs
Sectors capacities/conf.
CFMU
Coordination major traffic flows
•Establish pre-defined modus operandi•Establish process and procedures to apply•Establish defined priority criteria to use for decision
Strategic level
decisionsAirspace allocation
requests *
On line definition of airspace requests based on:•Fixed areas•Predefined areas•Requested shapes
* National decision to identify the
Approved Agencies
CRAM UCRAM
ADR
CFMU
IFPS
AOs:•Shortest routes•Cheapest routes•No-delay routes
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 15
15
FAB CEContingency Concept
COST EFFECTIVENESS: Targeted in Dynamic AoR for the whole Contingency cycle
SAFETY: FAB mutual assistance achieved in Initial Operations
BUSINESS: FAB – ATS delegation achieved in Static AoR Operations
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 16
16
FAB CEConclusions
• Concept of FAB driven by OPS needs, using existing and planned ATS facilities
• Incremental, performance driven development and implementation
• Alignment with SES and European Network
• Adaptation responding to the evolution of traffic
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Second level
• Third level
• Fourth level
• Fifth level
04/11/23 17
17
FAB CEFAB CE Feasibility StudyOPS WG
THANK YOU !