1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I A. Common Law Illegality F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Transcript
Slide 1
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I A. Common Law
Illegality F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Slide 2
Weve discussed why promises should be binding Now: when should
they not be binding ? 2
Slide 3
Weve discussed why promises should be binding Now: when should
they not be binding ? Weve assumed that bargains make people better
off. But what if they dont? 3
Slide 4
What does it mean to choose badly? 1.Immoral choices 2.Choices
that Harm Others 3.Self-Defeating Choices 4
Slide 5
1.Immoral Choices Should the state enforce morals? The Borders
of Private and Public Law 5
Slide 6
2.Choices that Harm Others Third Party Externalities But what
counts as a harm? 6
Slide 7
3.Self-defeating Choices Do the parties have capacity to choose
wisely Did they consent to the choice? 7
Slide 8
3.Self-defeating Choices Capacity to Contract I wanted x but
somehow I chose not- x. 8
Slide 9
3.Self-defeating Choices Vices of Consent Fraud Duress
Unconscionability? 9
Slide 10
Mill On Liberty (1859) What does this mean? It really is of
importance, not only what men do, but also what manner of men they
are that do it. Among the works of man, which human life is rightly
employed in perfecting and beautifying, the first in importance
surely is man himself. 10
Slide 11
Immoral Choices Wait, that was a value judgment!!!! 11
Slide 12
Immoral Choices The moral landscape: subjectivists and
anti-subjectivists Subjectivism: Each individual is the source of
his personal moral judgment and there is no external basis for
morality (relativism) Anti-subjectivism: An individuals moral
judgment may be second-guessed, even when the individual holds it
sincerely 12
Slide 13
Immoral Choices Is there such a thing as being too judgmental?
13
Slide 14
Immoral Choices Is there such a thing as being too judgmental?
Especially when the state enforces morals? 14
Mills harm principle: The only purpose for which power can
rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community,
against his will, is to prevent harm to others. Mill, On Liberty
(1859) 17
Slide 18
Neutralism 18
Slide 19
John Stuart Mill & Harriet Taylor 19
Slide 20
The Film Version: as done by Merchant & Ivory With Hugh
Grant as JSM 20
Slide 21
The Film Version And Emma Thompson As Harriet Taylor 21
Slide 22
Hi Mom. Hi Dad. Im home! And Jerry Mathers As The Beaver
22
Slide 23
Mills harm principle What does this mean? It is proper to state
that I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument
from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility.
I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions
23
Slide 24
Mills harm principle The only purpose for which power can
rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community,
against his will, is to prevent harm to others. And just what does
that mean? 24
Slide 25
Mills harm principle The only purpose for which power can
rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community,
against his will, is to prevent harm to others. Self-regarding
harms dont provide a basis for state interference 25
Slide 26
Mills harm principle So what does that leave? What choices
would Mill restrict? 26
Slide 27
Neutralism So what does that leave? Other-regarding harms:
Externalities 27
Slide 28
Neutralism So what does that leave? Other-regarding harms:
Externalities Children, etc. The time when mankind have become
capable of being improved by free and equal discussion 28
Slide 29
The Legal Response Statutory and Common Law Illegality 29
Slide 30
30 Statutory and Common Law Illegality Contracts rendered
illegal by statute: Watts v. Malatesta 481 Contracts illegal at
common law: Baby M 487
Slide 31
Statutory Illegality: Gambling 31 The game is pool straight
pool
Slide 32
Statutory Illegality: Gambling 32 The Hustler Looks like a
church Yeah. The Church of the Good Hustle.
Slide 33
Why should gambling be stigmatized? 33
Slide 34
34 Is gambling inconsistent with the norms of capitalism? 34
Daniel Bell, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism You can
scissors-and-paste the Ross Douthat piece
Slide 35
Gambling: Criminal Sanctions VA 18.2-325. 1. "Illegal gambling"
means the making, placing or receipt, of any bet or wager in this
Commonwealth of money or other thing of value, made in exchange for
a chance to win a prize, stake or other consideration or thing of
value, dependent upon the result of any game, contest or any other
event the outcome of which is uncertain or a matter of chance NY
991 in Watts 35
Slide 36
Gambling: Civil Law Effects VA 11-14. Gaming contracts void.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, all wagers,
conveyances, assurances, and all contracts and securities whereof
the whole or any part of the consideration is money or other
valuable thing won, laid, or bet, at any game, horse race, sport or
pastime, and all contracts to repay any money knowingly lent at the
time and place of such game, race, sport or pastime, to any person
for the purpose of so gaming, betting, or wagering, or to repay any
money so lent to any person who shall, at such time and place, so
pay, bet or wager, shall be utterly void. NY 992 in Watts 36
Slide 37
But its OK when we do it 11-14. Gaming contracts void. Except
as otherwise provided in this section, all wagers, conveyances,
assurances, and all contracts and securities whereof the whole or
any part of the consideration is money or other valuable thing won,
laid, or bet, at any game, horse race, sport or pastime, and all
contracts to repay any money knowingly lent at the time and place
of such game, race, sport or pastime, to any person for the purpose
of so gaming, betting, or wagering, or to repay any money so lent
to any person who shall, at such time and place, so pay, bet or
wager, shall be utterly void. Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, a contract governing the distribution of state lottery
proceeds shall be valid and enforceable as between the parties to
the contract. 37
Slide 38
Watts at 481 What happened 38
Slide 39
Watts 39 Lost and paid $37,500 Lost and paid net $100,000 sues
to recover his losses. Can offset against this claim his far
greater losses to ?
Slide 40
Watts 40 What does Ex turpi causa oritur non actio mean?
40
Slide 41
Watts 41 What does Ex turpi causa oritur non actio mean?
Contract void as to future performance 41
Slide 42
Watts 42 How as this changed by NY 994? 42
Slide 43
Watts 43 How as this changed by NY 994? any person can recover
gambling losses 43
Slide 44
Watts 44 How as this changed by NY 994 Which rule has better
incentive effects? 44
Slide 45
Watts 45 What does In pari delicto portior est conditio
defendentis mean? 45
Slide 46
Wait a minute Just how do professional gamblers collect their
winnings? 46
Slide 47
How do professional gamblers collect their winnings? Remember
Nick the Chin 47 Im tinkin youse should pay what youse owe
Slide 48
The real problem Is every contract made in breach of statute
void for illegality? 48
Slide 49
Simple regulations with no criminal penalty attached If
breached, what are the consequences in contract law? 49
Slide 50
Not every breach of a stature makes a contract unenforceable
Restatement 181. If a party is prohibited from doing an act because
of his failure to comply with a licensing, registration or similar
requirement, a promise in consideration of his doing that act or of
his promise to do it is unenforceable on grounds of public policy
if (a) the requirement has a regulatory purpose, and (b) the
interest in the enforcement of the promise is clearly outweighed by
the public policy behind the requirement. 50
Slide 51
Statutory Illegality What is not a regulatory purpose Cf.
Restatement 181, Illustration 1. 51
Slide 52
Statutory Illegality What does public policy mean here? Cf.
Restatement 181 illustrations 2 and 4 52
Slide 53
Should yoga studios be licenced? 53 Yoga practitioners
experience, love abundance and true fulfillment in their lives:
Deepak Chopra
Slide 54
I assume youve all had your chakras aligned recently A customer
at a yoga studio runs up a tab of $1,000. The studio is not
licensed. 54
Slide 55
I assume youve all had your chakras aligned recently A customer
at a yoga studio runs up a tab of $1,000. The studio hasnt paid
city taxes for the last two years. 55
Slide 56
Common Law Illegality That was contracts illegal by statute but
what about contracts illegal at common law? 56
Slide 57
Common Law Illegality 57 Restatement 192 ff. Promises to commit
a tort
Slide 58
58 Common Law Illegality Restatement 178(1): Unenforceability
on Grounds of Public Policy (1) A promise or other term of an
agreement is unenforceable on grounds of public policy if
legislation provides that it is unenforceable or the interest in
its enforcement is clearly outweighed in the circumstances by a
public policy against the enforcement of such terms.
Slide 59
59 Common Law Illegality Restatement 178(2) (2) In weighing the
interest in the enforcement of a term, account is taken of (a) the
parties' justified expectations, (b) any forfeiture that would
result if enforcement were denied, and (c) any special public
interest in the enforcement of the particular term.
Slide 60
60 Common Law Illegality Restatement 178(3): Unenforceability
on Grounds of Public Policy (3) In weighing a public policy against
enforcement of a term, account is taken of: (a)the strength of that
policy as manifested by legislation or judicial decisions, (b) the
likelihood that a refusal to enforce the term will further that
policy, (c) the seriousness of any misconduct involved and the
extent to which it was deliberate, and (d) the directness of the
connection between that misconduct and the term.
Slide 61
The effect of arbitration clauses Buckeye at 485: Whats the
argument that the arbitration clause is voided? And what did the
Court hold? 61
Slide 62
Common Law Illegality: Baby M at 487 What happened? 62
Slide 63
Common Law Illegality: Baby M at 487 How do you see Mary Beth
Whitehead? 63
Slide 64
Mary Beth Whitehead 64
Slide 65
Baby M Mary Beth Whitehead 65
Slide 66
Baby M The Sterns 66
Slide 67
Baby M 67 Why did the Whiteheads enter into the contract?
Slide 68
Baby M 68 Why did the Sterns not have their own children?
Slide 69
So what did the court hold? 69
Slide 70
So what did the court hold? Why was it contrary to statute?
70
Slide 71
So what did the court hold? Why was it contrary to statute? Was
there an intentional abandonment 71
Slide 72
So what did the court hold? Why was it contrary to public
policy? 72
Slide 73
So what did the court hold? OMG, no lawyers, no psychologists
to advise her!!!! 73
Slide 74
Baby M: Who gets the child? 74
Slide 75
Baby M: Who gets the child? Whos got the better c.v.? 75 Who is
more likely to: subscribe to The New Republic? attend an Arthur
Miller play? read a Jonathan Franzen novel?
Slide 76
Baby M 76 Did Whiteheads actions render her an unfit
mother?
Slide 77
Surrogacy Contracts Should they be enforced? There are, in a
civilized society, some things that money cannot buy Name some
other things 77
Slide 78
Surrogacy Contracts Should they be enforced? How would you have
redrafted the Whitehead contract? 78
Slide 79
Surrogacy Contracts Should they be enforced? Note that the
industry has expanded, AFTER Baby M. 79
Slide 80
Surrogacy Contracts Should they be enforced? Note that the
industry has expanded, AFTER Baby M. Why not just enforce them, if
the yuppies win anyway? 80
Slide 81
Surrogacy Contracts Are there any limits? An ultrasound reveals
that the child has Downs Syndrome. The agreement provides that it
is void in this case. 81
Slide 82
What about the following? A sale of a kidney? A futures
contract for a kidney? 82
Slide 83
What about the following? The sale of a child? 83
Slide 84
What about the following? The sale of a child? Why do we find
this revolting? Are we wrong to do so? 84
Slide 85
85 George Mason School of Law Contracts I A. Common Law
Illegality F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Slide 86
Recall Mills harm principle The only purpose for which power
can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized
community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. I.Why
not restrict self-regarding harms (or promote self-regarding
benefits)? 86
Slide 87
Recall Mills harm principle The only purpose for which power
can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized
community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. I.Why
not restrict self-regarding harms (or promote self-regarding
benefits)? II.What counts as a harm? 87
Slide 88
Self-regarding harms: Why ban hog- dog fights? 88 Meet Ari
arriving at Reagan Airport
Slide 89
What counts as evidence of a self-regarding harm or benefit?
Repugnance and approbation? Economic or survey evidence 89
Slide 90
Repugnance: Are Emotions Moral? Most of us feel repugnance at
things like hog-dog fights, even if we cannot articulate a rational
basis for our feelings E.g., desecrating a dead body 90
Slide 91
Are Emotions Moral? Most of us feel repugnance at things like
hog-dog fights, even if we cannot articulate a rational basis for
our feelings Should this inform our moral code? 91
Slide 92
Are Emotions Moral? Most of us feel repugnance at things like
hog-dog fights, even if we cannot articulate a rational basis for
our feelings Should this inform our moral code? Or our legal code?
92
Slide 93
Are Emotions Moral? Most of us feel repugnance at certain
things, even if we cannot articulate a rational basis for our
feelings Lets say we are taught not to feel repugnance for
desecrating a dead body, by a social worker. Have we lost something
of value? Or have we been morally improved? 93
Slide 94
Survey evidence: Marriage and Happiness 94 John F. Helliwell
and Shawn Grover, How's Life at Home? New Evidence on Marriage and
the Set Point for Happiness NBER Working Paper No. 20794
Slide 95
Marriage and Happiness Whatever Mill might think, does this
offer an argument for state policies that favor marriage? 95
Slide 96
Marriage and Happiness Whatever Mill might think, does this
offer an argument for state policies that favor marriage? E.g.,
Subsidies for marriage which arent available to the non-married
96
Slide 97
97 Promises detrimental to marriage Restatement 190(1): a
contract is illegal if it would change some essential incident in
the marriage relationship in a way detrimental to the public
interest Cf. Illustrations 1 and 5 97
Slide 98
Marriage: Marvin at 499 Does the state have an interest in
promoting marriage? And how do the incentives cut? 98 Palimony: Lee
Marvin and Michelle Triola 98
Slide 99
Marriage: Hewitt at 499 Does marriage matter? The casebook
describes the Hewitts relationship as merely lacking legal
formality 99
Slide 100
Marriage: Hewitt at 499 Does marriage matter? The casebook
describes the Hewitts relationship as merely lacking legal
formality Lets say you suggest a divorce to your spouse, for that
reason 100
Slide 101
Recall Mills harm principle The only purpose for which power
can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized
community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. II. What
counts as a harm? 101
Slide 102
What counts as a harm: Externalities Externalities are the
third party effects where my actions either confer a benefit or
impose a cost on others. 102
Slide 103
103 Three different kinds of capital Physical Capital (e.g.
pollution)
Slide 104
104 Different kinds of capital Physical capital Human Capital
Intelligence and health Private virtue, good character
Slide 105
105 Different kinds of capital Physical capital Human Capital
Social Capital Do you care who your neighbors are?
Slide 106
Social Externalities Are we influenced by the moral feelings of
those around us? 106
Slide 107
107 Social Capital: Do norms rub off on other people?
Slide 108
108 What counts as a harm? I fully admit that the mischief
which a person does to himself, may seriously affect, both through
their sympathies and their interests, those nearly connected with
him, and in a minor degree, society at large.
Slide 109
109 What counts as a harm? I fully admit that the mischief
which a person does to himself, may seriously affect, both through
their sympathies and their interests, those nearly connected with
him, and in a minor degree, society at large. Does this provide an
argument for legislating morals?
Slide 110
Some remaining issues Slippery slopes Can we trust the state?
110
Slide 111
111 The Battle of the Slippery Slopes In a slippery slope, I
want to do A and do not want to do B. But if I do A I am led into
doing B.
Slide 112
112 The Battle of the Slippery Slopes In a slippery slope, I
want to do A and do not want to do B. But if I do A I am led into
doing B. Is there a fallacy here?
Slide 113
113 The Battle of the Slippery Slopes In a slippery slope, I
want to do A and do not want to do B. But if I do A I am led into
doing B. Is there a fallacy here? Or is this an informational
problem?
Slide 114
114 Slippery Slopes: Perfectionists and Neutralists The
Perfectionist fears that a slight change in moral habits will lead
to the Decline and Fall of our civilization. 114
Slide 115
115 Slippery Slopes in Rome Couture, Les Romains de la
dcadence, 1847 115
Slide 116
116 Neutralism and Slippery Slopes The Neutralist fears that
any enforcement of morals will lead to the most severe restrictions
on liberty.
Slide 117
Mill on slippery slopes Society can and does execute its own
mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any
mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it
practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of
political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such
extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating
much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul
itself. 117
Slide 118
118 Can the state be trusted to legislate morals?
Slide 119
119 Can the state be trusted to legislate morals? President
Johnson signs the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Slide 120
120 Can the state be trusted to legislate morals? Jim Crow laws
were legislated by the states