+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: darren-bates
View: 225 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
46
1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

1

Global Helioseismology 2: Results

Rachel Howe, NSO

Page 2: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

2

Synopsis

• Mode parameters, mode physics, and the solar cycle– Frequency changes– Width, amplitude and asymmetry

• Internal Structure

• Internal Rotation– The overall picture– Temporal variations

Page 3: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

3

Frequency shifts with solar cycle

Page 4: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

4

Frequency shift sensitivity

Page 5: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

5

Even splitting coefficients follow magnetic activity distribution

Page 6: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

6

Localized global frequency shifts

Page 7: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

7

High-degree frequency shifts

• Mode frequencies are higher in active regions

• (Hindman et al, 2000).

Page 8: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

8

High-degree Frequency Sensitivity

• High-frequency modes can have anticorrelation with activity level.

Page 9: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

9

Note on Frequency Shifts

• Sensitivity depends mostly on frequency.

• Shifts are strongly localized to active regions.

• The effect is heavily dominated by the magnetic features at the surface.

• The exact mechanism (sound-speed? temperature? cavity size? magnetic field?) is still under debate.

Page 10: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

10

Mode Parameters

• Width is inversely proportional to lifetime

• Area under peak = mode power (amplitude)

• Power x lifetime = Energy Supply Rate

Page 11: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

11

Low-degree Mode Width

• l=0, 1, 2 modes from GONG and BiSON

Page 12: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

12

Low-degree Mode Amplitude

• l=0, 1, 2 modes from GONG and BiSON

Page 13: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

13

Medium-degree mode parameters• From Libbrecht,

1988.

Page 14: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

14

Mode Energy Varies With Activity

Page 15: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

15

High-degree Mode Amplitude

• Amplitude from ring-diagram analysis is suppressed in active regions.

Page 16: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

16

High degree mode amplitude

• But at higher frequencies peak amplitude increases with frequency.

Page 17: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

17

Sensitivity varies with frequency

Page 18: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

18

Mode Width Varies With Activity

Page 19: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

19

High-degree mode width

• Peaks are broader (shorter lifetimes) in active regions.

Page 20: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

20

High-degree mode width

• But at higher frequencies, linewidth decreases with activity.

Page 21: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

21

Sensitivity varies with frequency

Page 22: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

22

Reminder

• Oscillations excited by granulation.

• Might expect active regions to make a difference.

Page 23: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

23

Summary

• For trapped modes, power and lifetime decrease with activity.

• High frequency non-trapped modes behave differently, increasing power and lifetime in active regions.

• The boundary between trapped and untrapped may change with activity level.

Page 24: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

24

Summary of the Summary

• Rule 1: Everything varies with everything else.

• Rule 2: It’s more complicated than that.

Page 25: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

25

Structure Inversion Results

Page 26: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

26

Sound speed

Density

Fractional differencesbetween Sun and a model, in sense (Sun minus model)

from BiSON + LOWL data

(Basu et al. 1997, MNRAS 291, 243)

Results of OLA inversion of solar data

Page 27: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

27

Constraining solar structure

& models• Neutrino discrepancy

solved• All exotic models

inconsistent with measured frequencies

• Standard model pretty good, but still discrepancy below CZ

• Near surface poorly understood

Page 28: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

28

Depth of convection zoneFrom an inversion for sound speed, can calculate W,which in the convection zone takes the approximately

constant value -(Γ1-1)(except in regions of partial ionization).

Seismically determinedlocation of base of convection zone isrcz/R = 0.713 +/- 0.004

inversion

model

Page 29: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

29

Helium abundance

From inversions using u and Y, Richard et al.(1998) determined helium abundance in the solar convection zone to be 0.248 +/- 0.002

WCan also (try to) usethe HeII bump in Wat r=0.98Reither by fittingor from its signatureas a sharp feature

Page 30: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

30

2-d structure inversion from MDI

• Based on early (1996) MDI data

Page 31: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

31

Sound-speed Inversion Results – below the surface

Page 32: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

32

2-d structure remarks

• Most solar-cycle variation comes from near-surface activity – and goes into the surface term in inversions.

• Is something strange (hot) happening around 60 degrees?

Page 33: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

33

Rotation Inversion Results

• The mean rotation profile

• Residuals

• Phase and amplitude from sinusoid fits

Page 34: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

34

Rotation Inversion Results

Contours at approx. 25o to axis

Surface Shear

Tachocline

Page 35: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

35

Rotation Inversion Results

Page 36: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

36

Page 37: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

37

Penetrating flows

• Vorontsov et al 2002, Science• MDI, new inversion technique• High-latitude changes go deep• Low-latitude flows down to at least 0.92R

Page 38: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

38

Zonal Flow Pattern

Page 39: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

40

Zonal Flow Patterns (Time-Radius)

MDI OLA

MDI RLS

GONG RLS

0 15 30 45 60

Page 40: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

41

Sinusoid Fits

• r=rA(r,)sin[t+r]

• Phase (left) and amplitude (right) for 11yr sinusoid fits to zonal flow variation

• Fit can be improved by including 2nd harmonic.

MDI OLA

MDI RLS

GONG RLS

Page 41: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

42

Zonal Flows – the Movie

• Movie based on two-harmonic sinusoid fit to rotation residuals.

Page 42: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

44

Page 43: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

45

Flows and Magnetic Activity (Smoothed)

Page 44: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

46

Summary of Rotation Results

• Shear layer (tachocline) divides differentially-rotating convection zone from solidly-rotating radiative interior.

• Near-surface shear has fastest rotation around 0.95R.• Differential pattern persists through convection zone, not

quite radially.• Zonal flow pattern, or ‘torsional oscillation’ penetrates

much of convection zone.• Pattern has (weak) equatorward and (strong) poleward

branches.• Pattern in the interior is phase-shifted, leading the

surface pattern.

Page 45: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

47

Credits

• Thanks to:– W. J. Chaplin (Birmingham)– J. Christensen-Dalsgaard (Aarhus)– B. Hindman (CU Boulder)– J. W. Leibacher (NSO Tucson)– M. J. Thompson (Sheffield)

Page 46: 1 Global Helioseismology 2: Results Rachel Howe, NSO.

48

Further Reading

(Coming June 27)


Recommended