International Council on Systems Engineering and New Mexico Chapter Activity Executive Presentation 26-June-2015 for Paul D. Mann, SES Executive Director, U.S. Army White Sands Missile Range Presenter: Rick Dove President: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter New Mexico / El Paso Working Group Chair: Agile Systems and Systems Engineering Working Group Chair: Systems Security Engineering Adjunct Professor: Stevens Institute of Technology Sponsor: Thomas Tenorio Director at Large & Past President: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter Working Group Co-Chair: Autonomous Systems Test and Evaluation Senior Principal Systems Analyst: ATAMIR
Transcript
1
International Council on Systems Engineeringand New Mexico Chapter Activity
Executive Presentation 26-June-2015 forPaul D. Mann, SES
Executive Director, U.S. Army White Sands Missile Range
Presenter: Rick DovePresident: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter New Mexico / El PasoWorking Group Chair: Agile Systems and Systems Engineering
Working Group Chair: Systems Security EngineeringAdjunct Professor: Stevens Institute of Technology
Sponsor: Thomas TenorioDirector at Large & Past President: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter
Working Group Co-Chair: Autonomous Systems Test and EvaluationSenior Principal Systems Analyst: ATAMIR
2
Presenter & Sponsor BIOs
Rick Dove is a Fellow of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), and an adjunct professor at Stevens Institute of Technology teaching graduate courses in agile systems and systems engineering. He founded and chairs the INCOSE working groups for Systems Security Engineering and for Agile Systems and Systems Engineering. He is the New Mexico Chapter president for 2015. He is CEO/CTO of Paradigm Shift International, specializing in agile systems and agile security R&D and education. As principle Investigator (PI) he has led agile self-organizing system security R&D on four US DHS and OSD funded projects. He was co-PI on the 1991 OSD funded Lehigh study that introduced the concepts of agile systems and enterprises, put the word agile into play, and led the subsequent DARPA-funded research and industry-collaborative working groups during the nineties that established basic system fundamentals for agile systems of all kinds. In 1990 he established and led the research agendas and industry-collaborative working group processes for The National Center for Manufacturing Science. He is author of Response Ability – The language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise (Wiley). He has a BSEE from Carnegie-Mellon University. Complete bio and publication list at: www.parshift.com/Files/PsiDocs/RkdBio.pdf
Thomas Tenorio ([email protected]) is a Past President of the INCOSE Enchantment Chapter. He has over 30 years Systems Engineering experience supporting Test and Evaluation at White Sands Missile Range and the High Energy Systems Test Facility. He is currently employed by ATAMIR where he works as a Senior Principal Systems Analyst supporting tasking in the Systems Engineering G9 Directorate. Technical support areas include System of Systems, Unmanned and Autonomous Systems, real-time target control systems, decision architecture, and enterprise software development. He supports research and development related to large scale enterprise development of advanced services for Test Control in a mass collaboration environment involving both local and remote support capabilities. Focus areas include architecture frameworks for advanced decision making, hyper-networks, and complex systems engineering. Mr. Tenorio is an advocate for distributed communications and advanced Information Technology. He has worked for several Department of Defense contractors including GAN Corp, NCI, Rhino, Northrop, ATA, Lockheed, and BDM. He has a MS in Computer Science from NMSU and BBAs in Information Technology and Accounting from ENMU.
I would like to schedule a meeting with Mr. Mann regarding the INCOSEEnchantment Chapter, the regional representatives for the InternationalCouncil on Systems Engineering. We have an upcoming International Symposiumand are interested in determining how best to facilitate dialog andcollaboration among Government and Industry representatives in the Region.We have been approached by the FAA regarding Technical Interchange Meetingswith WSMR and other regional stakeholders. We are also interested ininforming you further about INCOSE at both the international and regionallevel. I am enclosing one of our newsletters and providing links to ourwebsites. As a former Enchantment Chapter president I would like tofacilitate a meeting with our current Chapter President, Rick Dove. We alsohave representatives on the board from Sandia, Los Alamos, and Honeywell toname a few. In the past I was successful in doubling the size of the localITEA conference by bringing in INCOSE representatives that included theINCOSE president and several national figures. I look forward to a meetingand further discussions. I would also like to discuss a possiblepresentation or webinar from you on the major System Engineeringcontributions you have been involved with.
Thomas Tenorio
4
Purpose of Meeting
Outreach exposure of INCOSE and the NM Chapter
as a possible White Sands resource.
Identification and discussion ofmutual values for working together.
We asked for this meetingbecause we sense mutual value in working together,
and want to show you value in working with us.
5
Presentation Contents
Chapter resourcesChapter 2015 Mission and GoalsChapter 2015 meeting topics and speakersChapter NewsletterChapter Project Example: The Art of Systems EngineeringChapter-Member organizations
INCOSE Mission and ResourcesINCOSE Corporate Advisory BoardINCOSE Collaborative Working GroupsINCOSE Project Example: Agile Systems Engineering Life Cycle Model workshops
Mutual opportunity discussion
6
Chapter Resources
Founded 2003~110 members from 30 organizations (June 2015)10 monthly meetings with international SMEs, and recorded archives
meetings in Albuquerque, recorded Web-broadcast for remote participation 11 monthly BOD planning meeting, 13 directors (2015)
meetings in Albuquerque, recorded Web-broadcast for remote participation2 tutorials with international SMEs, in the spring and fall2 social networking events in the summer and winterSpecial topic collaborative-discovery workshops (new in 2015)Student Division chapter, University of Texas, El Paso, Satellite chapter-meeting groups:
Directed Energy Directorate at the Phillips Research Site on Kirtland AFBQuarterly Newsletter publication with professional development articlesChapter website with archived meeting presentations, plus more material
Provide professional development value to members.
Chapter Reputation-Goals (achievement measured by member affirmation)• Recognized as the Regional Voice-of-SE
Need: Community awareness of INCOSE and Chapter as valued resources.Intent: Effective member and Chapter involvement with regional organizations.
• The Go-To Place for Professional DevelopmentNeed: Local resource for meaningful SE professional development.Intent: Exposure to SME’s in the theory and practice of leading SE concepts.
• Member Rewarding ActivitiesNeed: Opportunities for active engagement with Chapter resources.Intent: Member-attracting projects and workshops that engage members.
• Reliable and Effective ChapterNeed: Chapter strategic and operational effectiveness.Intent: Development and execution of goal-achievement Plans.
8
ConOps Activity Mapof 2015 Chapter Plan
Reputation GoalsActivities
ProvideFacilitated
Engagement
AscertainMemberInterests
FacilitateINCOSE WGInvolvement
ProvideIn-Demand
Talks/Tutorials
FacilitateSEP
Certification
ReviewExecution
Effectiveness
DevelopAnnual Plans
ProvideRegional
Interaction
4: Reliable &EffectiveChapter
3:Member-
RewardingActivities
1:Recognized asthe RegionalVoice-of-SE
2: THEProfessionalDevelopmentGo-To Place
Bi-directional support lines show “key-only” activity-support.
AscertainRegionalInterests
FacilitateRegional
Interaction
9
Meeting Topics 2015 (recorded)Q1 Chapter Meetings• Jack Ring, Educe, Modeling Conceptual Design• Dr. Chris Scrapper, Navy, Evolutionary SE for Unmanned Systems at SpaWar• Andy Pickard, Rolls Royce, When “Yes” is the Wrong Answer
Q2 Chapter Meetings • Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, Naval Post Graduate School, Design Thinking• Dr. Beth Wilson, Raytheon, NDIA Working Group Activities• Larri Rosser, Raytheon, SE Role in Agile Software Development• Tutorial: Dr. James Mason, Aerospace Corp, Systems Thinking Workshop
Q3 Chapter Meetings • Sandia Tram Tour and Sandiago’s Restaurant, Summer Social • Dr. Dov Dorie, Technion/MIT, MBSE with Object-Process Methodology (OPM)• Rick Dove, Stevens Institute, Agile 104: Design Quality
Q4 Chapter Meetings• Jennifer Maples, Phoenix Sky Harbor, Terminal 3 Modernization Project• Tutorial: Mathew Hause, PTC, Interface Management – From Theory to Modeling• El Pinto Restaurant, Albuquerque, Winter Social • Dr. Jimmie McEver, John Hopkins, Complex Systems WG and Primer Project
10
11
Example Project: The Art of Systems EngineeringNeed: Why is there no Julliard of systems engineering schools? Perhaps because we don’t understand the art of systems engineering; art of a quality that causes users to embrace engagement with the system, rather than having engagement be enforced by fiat, or entrapped by the lack of anything better.
Intent: Systems with no learning burden for effective usage and eventual mastery, that facilitate user productivity and goal achievement, that fit comfortably with the stakeholder’s and system’s operating environment, that facilitate feature and capability evolution throughout the life cycle, and that are a joy to use.
Mission: Discover architecting and design concepts and methods that will result in operationally embraceable systems.
Objectives: Converge on a clear and defensible understanding of need, opportunity, and considerations with examples - for embraceable system design. Write a high-quality paper that establishes the art of system architecting and design as a subject of value to systems engineering, establishes worthiness of educational attention, and outlines a general set of architecting and design considerations for embraceable design.
Method: Observe what works and why. Initially, two Fall 2105 ¾ day free workshops will review and analyze embraceable designs and the designer’s thinking for fundamental principles.
Outcome: This initial work should be a catalyst for follow-on work.
12
Chapter-Member Organizations
AECOM/URS (Holloman AFB)American SystemsApplied Technology AssociatesBoeing Company CAGBooz Allen HamiltonDecysive SystemsEagle Summit Technology AssociatesEOSESSHoneywellL-3 CommunicationsLockheed MartinLos Alamos National LaboratoryManagement SciencesMarine Corps Systems CommandNational Radio Astronomy Observatory
National Technical SystemsNCI Information Systems (WSMR)Paradigm Shift InternationalPTCRaytheonSAICSandia National LaboratoriesSirius RequirementsTechFlow ScientificUniversity of Texas at El PasoUS Air Force, Hanscomb AFBUS Air Force, Kirtland AFBUS Air Force, Research Lab US Air Force, Space Dev & Test Dir. Wagner Power Systems
Highlight Southern NM: 11 members + UTEP students
13
INCOSE Mission and ResourcesOverview – The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) is a not-for-profit membership organization founded to develop and disseminate the interdisciplinary principles and practices that enable the realization of successful systems.Mission – Share, promote and advance the best of systems engineering from across the globe for the benefit of humanity and the planet.Vision – The world's authority on Systems Engineering.
• Founded 1990• ~10,000 members world-wide in 2015• 87 Corporate Advisory Board (CAB) organizations• 4-Day International Workshop Jan/Feb with ~40 working group workshops• 4-day International Symposium Jun/July with papers, tutorials, workshops• Vision 2025 – guiding the planning and priorities• Certification: Professional Systems Engineer, training and exam• Bi-monthly Systems Journal publication (Wiley)• Quarterly practitioner-directed INSIGHT publication (Wiley)• Monthly Webinars• Systems Engineering Handbook• Working Groups with missions and collaborative projects
14
INCOSE Collaborative Working Groups (June 2015)
AffordabilityAgile Systems and Systems Eng.Anti-terrorism InternationalArchitectureAutonomous Systems Test and EvalCompetencyComplex SystemsCost EngineeringDecision AnalysisDefense SystemsEnterprise SystemsGlobal Earth Observation SoS (GEOSS)Human Systems IntegrationIn-Service SystemsKnowledge ManagementLean Systems EngineeringLife Cycle ManagementMeasurement
Model-based Conceptual DesignNatural SystemsObject-Oriented SE MethodPower & Energy SystemsProcess ImprovementReliability EngineeringRequirementsResilient SystemsRisk ManagementSpace SystemsSystems Engineering EffectivenessSystem of SystemsSystem Safety IntegrationSystems ScienceSystems Security EngineeringTrainingTransportation
15
Corporate Advisory Board (June 2015)Charter of the CAB
The Corporate Advisory Board (CAB) is the "Voice of the Corporate Customer" for INCOSE. CAB members provide: Guidance on overall INCOSE direction, focus, and priorities; A conduit between INCOSE and the sponsoring corporations for information exchange, key corporate systems engineering-related issues, and access to corporate executive management; and A bi-annual priority needs list and assessment of how well INCOSE is meeting those needs based on status inputs from the BoD and the Technical Board.
All employees of a CAB member have electronic access to all INCOSE products, even for employees who are not individual INCOSE members. All employees of a CAB member pay discounted fees to become certified under the INCOSE Certified Systems Engineering Professional program.
16
CAB Members June 2015Aerospace Corporation, TheAirbus Defense and SpaceAirbus GroupAlliant TechsystemsAM General LLCAnalytic ServicesATKINSAutolivAviation Industry Corporation of ChinaBAE SystemsBechtelBoeing CompanyBooz Allen Hamilton Inc.C.S. Draper Laboratory, Inc.Carnegie Mellon University SEICranfield UniversityDefense Acquisition UniversityDeloitteEngilityExelisFederal Aviation Administration (U.S.)Ford Motor CompanyGeneral DynamicsGeneral ElectricGeorge Mason UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologyHoneywell InternationalHuntington Ingalls IndustriesIBM CorporationiTiD Consulting, LtdJet Propulsion LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityKEIO UniversityL-3 CommunicationsLeidosLockheed Martin CorporationLos Alamos National LaboratoryManTech International CorporationMAP systemeMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMedtronic, Inc.Missouri University of Science & TechnologyMITRE Corporation, TheNanyang Technological University
National Aeronautics and Space AdminNational Reconnaissance OfficeNational Security Agency Enterprise SystemsNational University of SingaporeNaval Postgraduate SchoolNissan Motor Co, LtdNorthrop Grumman CorporationNova Management, IncPA ConsultingPacific Northwest National LaboratoryProcter & GambleProject Performance InternationalPTCRaytheon CorporationRockwell Collins, Inc.Rolls-RoyceSaab ABSandia National LaboratoriesScitor CorporationSiemensSotera Defense Solutions, Inc.Stellar SolutionsStevens Institute of TechnologySwedish Defence Materiel AdministrationSystems Planning and AnalysisTetra PakThalesTNO Technical SciencesUK MoDUniversity of ArkansasUniversity of MarylandUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyUniversity of New South Wales, The, CanberraUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUS Army ARDECUS Army TARDECUS Department of DefenseVencoreVirginia TechVitech CorporationVolvo Construction EquipmentWoodward IncWorcester Polytechnic Institute- WPI
17
Example: INCOSE Agile-SE Priority
INCOSE Vision 2025 Supporting Elements Resilient Systems Composable Design Adaptable and Scalable Methods
Top Five INCOSE CAB Priorities:1) SE Professional development 2) Agile/Expedited methods 3) Effective Trade Studies 4) Product lines, re-use 5) Better Value proposal for INCOSE and SE
ProactiveInnovative/Composable
Creates OpportunityTakes Preemptive Initiative
ReactiveResilient
Seizes OpportunityMitigates Adverse Events
Reactive Proficiency
P
roac
tive
P
rofi
cien
cy
Innovative(Composable)
Agile
Fragile Resilient
CAB: Corporate Advisory Board
18
Example Project:Agile Systems Engineering Life Cycle Model Fundamentals
INCOSE-Proj-201401
Purpose – Provide necessary & sufficient principles for agile SE processes compatible with all agile SE practices, organizational cultures, SE community needs, and 15288 standards.
Objectives– Discover generic principle-based life-cycle process activity necessary for
effectiveness in uncertain, unpredictable, and evolving SE environments.– Create actionable knowledge and insight among Host participants.Scope – Cover a wide variety of agile SE process types.
Method – 15 three-day workshops in US and Europe.– Analyze what works and why, then apply learning to a challenge.– Defense and Commercial Sectors with mixed HW/SW/WW* projects.– Analyze Host SE Process that dealt/deals with
Uncertainty, Unpredictability, Risk, Variation, and Evolution.– Apply the action-learning to a Host challenge in need of more agility.– Facilitate Host participant knowledge & insight development,
2 Host participants must attend at least two additional Host workshops.
*WW = Wet Ware, the stakeholders, customers, and people involved
Plus 2 from 15288-2015: Business/Mission Analysis and System Analysis
20
ProductionUse processes to
produce and improvesystem-of-interest
and evolve infrastructure
UtilizationUse processes to operate,
monitor and evolve system-of-interest,
its services andinfrastructure
ConceptUse processes to define
& explore alternativesolutions to meet a need
DevelopmentUse processes to transform
concepts and systemrequirements onto adocumented, costed,producible prototype
system-of-interest
RetirementUse processes to remove
from use, dispose of & archive (sub) systems-of-interest
SupportUse processes to maintain, supply
and supportsystem-of-interest
AgileSE
LCM
Criteria
Engage
Asynchronous-Stage Agile SE-Life Cycle ModelSystems and software engineering — Life cycle management — Part 1: Guide for life cycle management ISO/IEC TR 24748-1:2010(E)
Seven asynchronously-invoked stagescan be engaged repetitively and simultaneously
to achieve benefit when engagement criteria are met
ResearchUse processes to
observe and evaluate environmental evolution,
and how that presentsthreat or opportunity
Aug 05-07, SpaWar/MITRE in San Diego, CA
Aug 24-26, Northrop Grumman in McLean, VA
Sep 21-25, Rockwell-Collins in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Oct xx-xx, Lockheed in Fort Worth, date TBD
Nov xx-xx, Honeywell in Albuquerque, dates TBD
White Sands dates TBD, analyze LVC, then Spectrum challenge
Potential Mutual ValuesFor White Sands• Professional development of your System Engineers• Exposure to a diverse SE professional community: New Mexico & International• Access to SMEs for special interest topics, workshops, tutorials at White Sands• Leverage INCOSE Working Groups with focused project interest, e.g., T&E• Participation in collaborative-analysis workshops, eg, SpaWar Wave Model,
Honeywell LVC, embraceable system design principles, et al.• Collaborate with other organizations with similar interests• A platform to galvanize broad-community progress in T&E , et al. • Chapter support and participation in mutual interests
For the Chapter• Expand member professional development engagement opportunities• Membership-diversity exposure• Interest-diversity exposure• Experience-diversity exposure• Gain critical mass for pursuing topics of mutual interest
23
Opportunity Discussion
SE professional development …
Issues in T&E, autonomous systems, Spectrum, LVC, …
