+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March...

1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March...

Date post: 20-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
52
1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate and Product Supply Chains 1
Transcript
Page 1: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

1

INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS

World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010

Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate and Product Supply Chains

1

Page 2: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

Growing Practice of GHG Management in the Supply Chain

GHG Protocol and Supply Chain Initiative Overview

Scope 3 Standard: Overview and Key Requirements

Product Life Cycle Standard: Overview & Key Requirements

Next Steps

Presentation Outline

2

Page 3: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

3

Corporate GHG management moving beyond companies’ own operations, toward full value chain Investors pushing for supply chain GHG

disclosure and risk management Governments programs and policies

increasing public reporting of scope 3 and product-level GHG emissions

Companies requesting product and supply chain information from suppliers

The Growing Practice of GHG Management in the Supply Chain

Page 4: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

4

Company-specific: Wal-Mart’s supply chain sustainability initiative; Tesco’s product carbon labeling initiative; etc.

Sector-specific: Electronics industry; Beverage industry; Dairy industry; Utility industry; World Auto Steel; etc.

Cross-sector: Carbon Disclosure Project’s Supply Chain Initiative; WWF Climate Positive Initiative (under development)

Methodologies: Carbon Trust/Defra product life cycle methodology

Emerging Initiatives

Page 5: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

5

New Standards in Development

Scope 3 (Corporate Value Chain)Accounting & Reporting Standard

Quantify and report major GHG emissions in the value chain at the company/organization level (scope 3)

To understand, manage, and report GHG emissions across the entire value chain

Build on GHG Protocol Corporate Standard

Quantify and report product-level emissions

To understand, manage, and report the life cycle GHG emissions associated with individual products

Build on existing life cycle assessment standards

Product Life CycleAccounting & Reporting Standard

5

Page 6: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

6

Process Structure

WRI/WBCSD Secretariat

Steering Committee (25 members)

ProductTechnical Working

Groups ( 100+ members)

Scope 3Technical Working

Groups ( 60+ members)

Stakeholder Advisory Group (1,000+)

Product Standard Scope 3 Standard

6

Page 7: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

77

Setting Boundaries:

What do you include in scope 3?Steering Committee Members

• Alcan Packaging • Carbon Disclosure Project • Carbon Trust • Carnegie Mellon University • Dow Chemical Company• DNV • Energy Research Institute, China • Environmental Defense Fund• ERM • European Commission Joint Research Centre • General Electric • Georgia Pacific• Harvard School of Public Health • Natura

• Natural Resources Defense Council• New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry• Product Carbon Footprint Pilot Project, Germany • PricewaterhouseCoopers• Shell • Tsinghua University, China • UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative • Unilever • UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs• US Environmental Protection Agency • ISO TC207 - US TAG• Walmart

7

Page 8: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

Date ActivityMarch/April 2010 WRI/WBCSD:

– Analyze all written comments by chapter and type

– Make minor edits (i.e. spelling/grammar edits, rather than key issues and inconsistencies)

– Address all written comments to maintain transparency in the process

– Identify a number of options for addressing the key issues

April Calls to brief TWG and Steering Committee members on stakeholder comments and preliminary road testing feedback

WRI/WBCSD conduct internal editing and develop revision options

May 18-21st Product and Scope 3 Road Testing Workshops

June Inventory and feedback reports due from Road Testers TWGs hold calls to review proposed options and develop work plan for the summer Steering Committee meeting (June 28-30)

July/August WRI/WBCSD publish summary of road testing feedback TWG provide input on proposed revisions based on stakeholder comments, road

test feedback, and steering committee feedback

September Release of revised drafts for stakeholder comment 30 day public comment period on revised drafts

October/November WRI/WBCSD compile and analyze written stakeholder comments WRI/WBCSD revise standards with input from Steering Committee and TWG

members as needed

December 2010 Final texts of standards are completed

Process Timeline

Page 9: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

9

Scope 3Accounting & Reporting Standard

9

Page 10: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

10 10

Scope 3 Standard ContentsPart 1: General Requirements & Guidance

1. Introduction

2. Accounting and reporting principles

3. Business goals and inventory design

4. Mapping the value chain

5. Setting the boundary

6. Collecting data

7. Calculating emissions

8. Accounting for GHG reductions

9. Performance tracking

10. Setting a reduction target

11. Managing inventory quality

12. Assurance

13. Reporting and communication

Page 11: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

11 11

Scope 3 Standard ContentsPart 2: Guidance for Specific Scope 3 Categories

1. Purchased Goods & Services – Direct Supplier Emissions2. Purchased Goods & Services – Cradle-to-Gate Emissions3. Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 24. Capital Equipment5. Transportation & Distribution (Upstream / Inbound)6. Business Travel7. Waste Generated in Operations8. Franchises (Not Included In Scope 1 and 2) – Upstream9. Leased Assets (Not Included In Scope 1 and 2) – Upstream10. Investments (Not Included In Scope 1 and 2)11. Franchises (Not Included In Scope 1 and 2) – Downstream12. Leased Assets (Not Included In Scope 1 and 2) – Downstream13. Transportation & Distribution (Downstream / Outbound)14. Use of Sold Products15. Disposal of Sold Products at the End of Life16. Employee Commuting

Page 12: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

12 12

GHG Protocol Reporting Requirements

Report in conformance with theGHG Protocol Corporate Standard

and Scope 3 Standard

Shall report all scope 1 and 2 emissions

Should optionally report scope 3 emissions

Shall report all scope 1 and 2 emissions

Shall report scope 3 emissions (following the requirements/guidance in this standard)

Report in conformance with theGHG Protocol Corporate Standard

Page 13: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

13

Review Principles Chapter 2

Define Business

Goals Chapter 3

Map the Value Chain

Chapter 4

Set the Boundary Chapter 5

Collect Data

Chapter 6

Calculate Emissions Chapter 7

Report Emission

s Chapter

13

Steps in Scope 3 Accounting and ReportingScope 3: Steps in Accounting & Reporting

13

Page 14: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

14 14

Business Goals of Scope 3 Accounting & Reporting

A. GHG management, including identifying GHG reduction opportunities in the value chain; guiding investment and procurement decisions; and managing climate-related risk

B. Performance tracking, including setting a baseline, setting GHG reduction goals, and tracking progress over time

C. Engaging partners in the value chain to expand GHG accountability, transparency and management throughout the value chain

D. Public reporting of GHG emissions to meet the decision-making needs of stakeholders (e.g., policy-makers, investors, purchasers, customers, suppliers, employees, NGOs, etc.), as well as participation in corporate-level GHG reporting programs and registries

Page 15: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

Principle Definition

Relevance Ensure the GHG inventory appropriately reflects the GHG emissions of the company and serves the decision-making needs of users – both internal and external to the company.

Completeness Account for and report on all GHG emission sources and activities within the chosen inventory boundary. Disclose and justify any specific exclusions.

Consistency Use consistent methodologies to allow for meaningful comparisons of emissions over time. Transparently document any changes to the data, inventory boundary, methods, or any other relevant factors in the time series.

Transparency Address all relevant issues in a factual and coherent manner, based on a clear audit trail. Disclose any relevant assumptions and make appropriate references to the accounting and calculation methodologies and data sources used.

Accuracy Ensure that the quantification of GHG emissions is systematically neither over nor under actual emissions, as far as can be judged, and that uncertainties are reduced as far as practicable. Achieve sufficient accuracy to enable users to make decisions with reasonable assurance as to the integrity of the reported information.

Accounting & Reporting Principles

15

Page 16: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

16

Tier 1 Suppliers

Reporting Company

VALU

E CHAIN

CradleGrave

Cradle to Gate emissions of

purchased products and services

Gate to Grave emissions from

sold products and services

Gat

e

Gat

e

Raw Materials

Energy Activities

Capital Equipment

Transportation

Product Distribution

Product Use

Product Disposal

Scope 2 and 3 Scope 3Scope 1

Purchase Sale

Emissions from the

company’s operations

Page 17: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

17 17

  Category Source Description

Upstream Scope 3

Emissions from Purchased Products

1. Purchased Goods & Services: Direct Supplier Emissions

Scope 1 and 2 emissions of a reporting company’s direct (tier 1) suppliers, including outsourced activities, (e.g., contract manufacturing, data centers, outsourced services, etc.)

2. Purchased Goods & Services: Cradle-to-Gate Emissions

Extraction and production of inputs (i.e., purchased or acquired goods, services, materials, or fuels) associated with all suppliers upstream (tiers 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) Manufacturing/construction of tier 1, 2, 3, 4… suppliers’ capital equipment Disposal/treatment of waste generated in the production of inputs (i.e., purchased or acquired goods, services, materials or fuels) Transportation and distribution of inputs associated with suppliers further upstream (tier 2, 3, 4., etc.)

3. Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 2

Extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed in the generation of electricity, steam, heating and cooling (either purchased or own generated by the reporting company) Generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed in a T&D system (reported by end user) Purchase of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is sold to an end user (reported by utility company)

4. Capital Equipment Manufacturing/construction of capital equipment owned or controlled by the reporting company

5. Transportation & Distribution

Transportation and distribution of inputs (i.e., purchased or acquired goods, services, materials or fuels), including intermediate (inter-facility) transport & distribution, warehousing & storage, warehousing and storage, associated with direct suppliers Transportation of waste generated in operations

6. Business Travel Employee business travel

7. Waste Generated in Operations

Disposal/treatment of waste generated in operations

8. Franchises Operations of franchisor (reported by franchisee)

9. Leased Assets Manufacturing/construction and operation of leased assets not included in lessee’s scope 1 (reported by lessee)

10. Investments GHG emissions associated with investments, including fixed asset investments and equity investments not included in scope 1 and 2

Downstream Scope 3 Emissions from Sold Products

11. Franchises Manufacturing/construction and operation of franchise not included in franchisor’s scope 1 (reported by franchisor)

12. Leased Assets Manufacturing/construction and operation of leased assets not included in lessor’s scope 1 (reported by lessor)

13. Transportation & Distribution

Transportation and distribution of sold products, including warehousing and retail

14. Use of Sold Products

Use of sold products and services

15. Waste Disposal of sold products at the end of their life

Other Scope 3 Emissions

16. Employee Commuting

Employees commuting to and from work

Page 18: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

18

After mapping the value chain, companies shall account for and report:

The largest scope 3 sources that collectively account for at least 80%* of total anticipated scope 3 emissions (excluding use phase);

The use phase emissions of select product types; and

All scope 1 and scope 2 emissions, as required by the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard

* The selection of an 80% threshold is tentative pending road testing

Setting the Boundary: Boundary Requirements

18

Page 19: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

19

To determine which scope 3 activities are most significant in size, companies should follow these steps:

1. Use screening methods to individually estimate the emissions from all scope 3 activities (examples provided in Part 2 of the standard for each category)

2. Express each individual scope 3 activity’s estimated emissions as a fraction of total anticipated scope 3 emissions

3. Rank all scope 3 activities from largest to smallest to determine which activities are most significant

Setting the Boundary

19

Page 20: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

20

Product Type Examples

• Consumes energy (fuels or electricity) in the use phase

Automobiles, aircraft, engines, motors, buildings, appliances, electronics, lighting

• FuelsPetroleum products, natural gas, coal, biofuels

• Contains GHGs that are emitted during use

Aerosols, refrigerants, industrial gases, SF6, HFCs, PFCs, fire extinguishers

Use of Sold Products:Required Product Types

Page 21: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

21

Guidance: Prioritizing Relevant Emissions Based on Other Criteria

• Additional scope 3 activities (below the threshold) should be considered relevant if they meet any of the following criteria:

Criteria Description

Influence There are potential emissions reductions that could be undertaken or influenced by the company

Risk They contribute to the company’s risk exposure

Stakeholders They are deemed critical by key stakeholders (e.g. customers, suppliers, investors or civil society)

Outsourcing They are outsourced activities typically insourced by other companies in the reporting company’s sector

Other They meet additional criteria developed by the company or industry sector

21

Page 22: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

22

Collecting Data

Four-step process for collecting and evaluating data:

Prioritizeactivities

1

Assess

data sources

2

Collect

data

3

Evaluate

collected data

4

Page 23: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

23

Collecting Data: Data Types

Data Type Description Examples

Primary Data

Observed data collected from specific facilities owned or operated by the reporting company or a company in its supply chain

The reporting company surveys its suppliers and collects product-level data or scope 1 and 2 emissions data from specific facilities in its supply chain.

Secondary Data

Generic or industry average data from published sources that are representative of a company’s operations, activities, or products

Data from life cycle inventory databases, literature studies, environmentally-extended input-output models; default IPCC emission factors; industry associations; etc.

Page 24: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

24

Collecting Data: Methods to Fill Data GapsEstimation Method

Description Examples

Extrapolated Data

• Data related to a similar (but not representative) input, process or activity to the one in the inventory

• Customized to a new situation to make more representative

There is secondary data available for electricity in Ukraine but not for electricity in Moldova. The company customizes the data for electricity in Ukraine to make it more representative of electricity in Moldova (e.g., by modifying the electricity generation mix).

Proxy Data

• Data related to a similar (but not representative) input, process, or activity to the one in the inventory

• Not customized to a new situation to make more representative

There is secondary data available for electricity in Ukraine but not for electricity in Moldova. The company uses the data for electricity from Ukraine without modification as a proxy for electricity in Moldova.

Page 25: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

25

Collecting Data

• As a general rule, companies should apply the following hierarchy in collecting data:

1. Primary data

2. Secondary data

3. Extrapolated data

4. Proxy data

Page 26: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

• When collecting primary data from value chain partners, companies should obtain the most product-specific data available, according to the following hierarchy:

1. Product-level data

2. Process-level data

3. Facility-level data

4. Business unit-level data

5. Corporate-level data

26

Collecting Primary Data from Value Chain Partners

Page 27: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

27

• The degree to which the data represents the relevant activity• The percentage of locations for which site specific or generic data are available and

used out of the total number that relate to a specific activity. Generally, a percent target is identified for the number of sites from which data is collected for each activity

Technological representativeness

Completeness

• Degree to which the data set reflects the actual technology(ies) used

Criteria Description

Temporal representativeness

• Degree to which the data set reflects the actual time (e.g., year) or age of the activity or whether an appropriate time period is used (e.g., annual/seasonal averages may be appropriate to smooth out data variability due to factors such as weather conditions)

Geographical representativeness

• Degree to which the data set reflects actual geographic location of the activity, e.g., country or site

Precision

• Measure of the variability of the data points used to derive the GHG emissions from an activity (e.g., low variance = high precision). Relates mostly to where direct measurements have been used.

Data Quality Criteria

Page 28: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

28

Illustrative GHG Reporting Form Primary Secondary Total Uncertainty

Scope 1: Direct Emissions from Owned/Controlled Operations

Scope 2: Indirect Emissions from the Use of Purchased Electricity, Steam, Heating and Cooling

Scope 3: Other Indirect Emissions

a. Indirect Emissions from Purchased Products (Upstream) 1. Purchased Goods & Services (Cradle-to-Gate Emissions) (Not Otherwise Included in Categories 2-10)

2. Energy-Related Emissions (Not Included in Scope 2) 3. Capital Equipment 4. Transportation & Distribution 5. Waste Generated in Operations 6. Business Travel 7. Franchises (Not Included in Scope 1 or 2) 8. Leased Assets (Not Included in Scope 1 or 2) 9. Investments (Not Included in Scope 1 or 2) 10. Otherb. Indirect Emissions from Sold Products (Downstream) 1. Franchises (Not Included in Scope 1 or 2

2. Leased Assets (Not Included in Scope 1 or 2 3. Distribution of Sold Products 4. Use of Sold Products 5. Disposal of Sold Products at the End of Life 6. Otherc. Other Indirect Emissions 1. Employee Commuting 2. Other

Direct (Tier 1) Supplier Emissions N/A

% of suppliers accounted for (as a % of total spend)

CO2 from Biomass Combustion 28

Page 29: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

29

Questions?

29

Page 30: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

30

Product Life CycleAccounting & Reporting Standard

30

Page 31: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

31

Current Product Standard Content

• Goal and Scope of the Product Standard• Principles of GHG Accounting• Steps to Performing a GHG Inventory• Establishing the Methodology• Defining the Functional Unit• Boundary Setting• Data Collection & Data Quality • Allocation• Calculating GHG Emissions• Assurance• Reporting a Product GHG Inventory

Page 32: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

32

Goal and Scope

The primary goal of the standard is public disclosure of product level GHG emissions– A product is any good or service

Implementing the standard may support additional business goals including: Identification of GHG reduction opportunities in a supply chain, performance tracking, supply chain engagement, and product differentiation

The standard is sufficiently flexible to support GHG quantification and reporting for many product types

Goal & Scope

Page 33: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

33

Goal and Scope

• This standard does not fully support product comparison– Valid product comparison, comparative assertion, and

labeling requires a greater degree of prescriptiveness than is provided in this standard.

• The standard will include guidance on how programs, sector specific guidance developers and organizations can specify additional constraints so that valid product comparisons and claims can be made

Goal & Scope

Page 34: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

3434

The overarching method for accounting for product GHG emissions is a life cycle approach

Including all stages of the life cycle, from cradle to grave:

Establishing the Methodology

Raw Material

AcquisitionProduction Distribution

& Retail Use End of Life

Page 35: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

35

• Companies shall follow the process life cycle accounting approach

• Companies shall use an attributional approach to assign life cycle GHG emissions to an individual product system for the purpose of public reporting

• Companies shall define the unit of analysis as the functional unit of the product

Establishing the Methodology

Page 36: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

36

Key Requirements: Setting the Boundary

• Processes that are attributable to the function of the product shall be included in the boundary of the product system

• Capital equipment shall be included in the product system if deemed significant for the studied product or product sector– Significance can be proven using a qualitative or

quantitative test. • Companies shall conduct a cradle-to-grave

assessment for all final products • Companies may conduct a cradle-to-gate assessment

for intermediate products when the eventual fate of a product is unknown

Setting the Boundary

Page 37: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

37

Life Cycle Stages

Setting the Boundary

Page 38: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

38

Key Requirements: Collecting Data

• Primary data shall be collected for all processes under the control of the company undertaking the product inventory

• For all other processes, primary or secondary data of the highest practical quality shall be collected

• Data gaps shall be filled using extrapolation or proxy data

Collecting Data

Page 39: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

39

Key Requirements: Data Quality Assessment

• A data quality assessment shall be undertaken for all GHG emissions sources that cumulatively sum to 75% of total product emissions

• For all processes quantified using any primary data, a qualitative data quality assessment shall be undertaken based on technological, temporal and geographical representativeness, completeness, and precision

• For processes that only use secondary data, the data quality assessment shall be undertaken based on technological, temporal and geographical representativeness

Data Quality Assessment

Page 40: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

40

Key Requirements: Assurance• The product GHG Inventory

shall be assured• The following types of

assurance are permissible:– First Party (“Self” or “Internal”)

assurance– Third Party (”External”) process

assurance

• The assurance opinion shall be expressed in the form of either reasonable (high) assurance or limited (moderate) assurance

Assurance (referred to as “verification” in the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard) is an

objective assessment of the accuracy, completeness and presentation of a reported product GHG inventory and the conformity

of the product GHG inventory to the standard. In order to state compliance with the standard, the product GHG inventory

shall be assured

Performing Assurance

Page 41: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

41

Key Requirements: Reporting

• A company shall publicly disclose a GHG inventory report– This report is divided into a summary and

detailed report to address the needs of different audiences:

• The summary and detailed reports shall be disclosed together

Reporting

Page 42: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

42

Key Requirements: Summary Report

• The summary report shall include:– Introduction– Process map– Results– Assurance and data quality information– A statement on the use of results

• e.g., a company will use the results to reduce GHG emissions along the product life cycle

Reporting

Page 43: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

43

• The detailed report shall include more information on:– Sector or product specific data sources used– Assumptions and justifications

• Cradle to Gate Inventories• Temporal Boundary• Exclusion of Capital Goods• Allocation (performed on data collected under the

ownership of the company)• Recycling

Key Requirements: Detailed ReportReporting

Page 44: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

44

Next Steps

44

Page 45: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

Road Testing

45

More than 70 companies currently road testing one or both of the standards Wide range of sizes, sectors, and

geographical locations Kick-off meeting: January 21st 2010 Process continues through the end of June

Each company will provide detailed feedback and a case study on their experience with the standard

Page 46: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

Scope 3 Standard Road Testing Companies

3M Company Kraft FoodsAbengoa Levi Strauss & Co.Acer Inc National GridAirbus S.A.S Natura CosméticosAkzoNobel New Belgium BrewingAlcan Packaging PE InternationalAutodesk, Inc. PfizerBaoshan Iron & Steel CO. LTD Pinchin Environmental Ltd.BASF SE PricewaterhouseCoopersCoca-Cola Erfrischungsgetränke AG Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.Deutsche Post DHL SAP AGDeutsche Telekom AG SC Johnson and SonEclipse Networks (Pty) Ltd. SiemensFord Motor Company Suzano Pulp and PaperUS GSA Federal Acquisition Service Swire BeveragesHasbro Inc. UK Highways AgencyHydro Tasmania Veolia WaterIBM VT Group IKEA Webcor BuildersItalcementi Group

Page 47: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

47

Product Standard Road Testing Companies

3M Company Italcementi GroupAcer Inc JohnsonDiverseyAkzoNobel LenovoAlcan Packaging Levi Strauss & Co.Alcoa Mitsubishi Chemical CorporationAnvil Knitwear, Inc. Natura CosméticosBaoshan Iron & Steel CO. LTD New Belgium BrewingBASF SE Ningbo Youngor Sunrise Textile Dyeing & Finishing Co., ltd. Belkin PepsiCo, Inc.Belron International Procter & Gamble EurocorBloomberg LP Rogers CommunicationsBT plc Shanghai Zidan Food Packaging and Printing Co., Ltd.CA, Inc. Shell International Petroleum Company Ltd Colors Fruit SA (Pty) Ltd Siemens AGDeutsche Post DHL Suzano Pulp and PaperDeutsche Telekom AG Swire BeveragesDuPont TAL Apparel Limited

Eclipse Networks (Pty) Ltd.Tech-Front (Shanghai) Computer Co., Ltd. / Quanta Shanghai Manufacturing City

Ecolab Tennant CompanyGeneral Electric Verso Paper Corp.Gold’n Plump Poultry, LLC WeyerhaeuserUS GSA Federal Acquisition Service WorldAutoSteel

Page 48: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

48

List of Products (to date) 2.5 MW Wind Turbine Food Packaging Product

Advanced High Strength Steels Forged Aluminum Wheel

AnvilSustainable™ Transitional Cotton Tee Home insurance

Bloomberg Flat Panel Hot rolled coil

Bresso Packaged Cream Cheese Industrial Chemical

Calcestruzzo (concrete) Just BARE chicken

Chemicals for a T-Shirt Production Magazine

Citrus Fruit Exports from South Africa to the UK Men's Levi Jeans

Coated Freesheet Paper MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) network product

Coca-Cola Branded Products Non-iron shirt

Conserve Smart AV Notebook Computer

Cosmetics and soap products Restaurant Meals

Cotton bleached fabric Scotchkote Spray in Place Pipe 269 Coating

Desktop ComputerSIPROTEC 4 (Universal Differential Protection Relay for Two Line Ends)

DetergentT3 with ec-H2O, floor scrubber with chemical free cleaning technology

Deutsche Post PLUSPÄCKCHEN; DHL Express TDI Vehicle windscreen replacement/repair

European Disposable Diaper Size 4 Videoconferencing system

Fat Tire Amber Ale Wood Product

Page 49: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

49

In 2010, WRI and WBCSD, in collaboration with the Steering Committee and Technical Working Groups, will: Revise draft standards based on feedback received

during 5 stakeholder workshops and the stakeholder comment period (November 11 – December 21, 2009)

Revise draft standards based on feedback received during road testing

Circulate second drafts for public comment in September 2010

Revise second drafts based on feedback received Finalize text in December 2010

Finalizing Draft Standards

49

Page 50: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

• For copies of any GHG Protocol Publication, please see: www.ghgprotocol.org

• For copies of the draft Scope 3 and Product Standards, please see: www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/product-and-supply-chain-standard

• For updates on the standard development process, please join the stakeholder advisory group

50

GHG Protocol Standards & Publications

Page 51: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

51

Thank You

51

Cynthia [email protected]

www.ghgprotocol.org

Page 52: 1 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF GHG PROTOCOL PROGRAMS World Resources Institute, Washington DC, March 22-23, 2010 Accounting For GHG Emissions In Corporate.

• Are any existing programs considering the incorporation of the scope 3 and/or product standard?

• What are the anticipated challenges to incorporate these standards into your programs?

• Do you anticipate any new programs or policies being developed once these standards are finalized?

• What role can WRI play in the design and implementation of programs/policies based on these new standards?

52

Discussion Questions


Recommended