Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | elvin-cross |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 2 times |
2
Presentation Overview
Share public perceptions and provide information
Answer frequently asked questions related to express lanes
3
All Alternatives Considered
No build, 3 build alternatives being considered equally Extended public comment period (May 18-July 17) 4 public hearings 4 council presentations: Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Huntington
Beach, Seal Beach Seal Beach community meeting 3 focus groups Attended Gateway Council of Governments Long Beach and Los Angeles Metro coordination Ongoing stakeholder outreach
4
Clarifying M2 Funding
Measure M2 is not paying for a toll road
M2 project is one regular lane each direction
All alternatives deliver the M2 promise
6
Clarifying Alternatives Westminster parking impacts: Same in Alt 1, 2, 3
Number of full business acquisitions: Same in Alt 1, 2, 3
Structures / bridges: Bolsa Chica to Euclid: Same in Alt 1, 2, 3 Harbor, Fairview, SR-73 connector: Alt 3 only
• Air quality: No build – Worst Alt 1 – Better Alts 2 & 3 – Best
7
Express Lanes:Perceptions & Questions
Perceptions:
91 Express Lanes aren’t used, don’t work
Toll facility revenues don’t cover costs
Questions:
How are the 91 Express Lanes operated?
Why is throughput different in free flow versus congested conditions?
How would the ingress/egress work for the I-405?
9
Successful toll facility Grown from 5.7 M trips in 1996 to 11.6 M trips in 2012 Generates sufficient amount of tolls revenue to pay for operations,
maintenance, debt service expenses Invested about $14 million in excess toll revenues in other SR-91 corridor
projects to relieve congestion
Uses congestion management pricing Goal is to maintain free flow speeds and optimize throughput Toll levels set to match relative traffic levels Tolls vary by time of day, day of week, direction of travel Automatic trigger points used to adjust tolls up/down
11
91 Express LanesTraffic and Revenue 1995 to 2010
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Dec-95
Jun-96
Dec-96
Jun-97
Dec-97
Jun-98
Dec-98
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10Tr
affic
and
Reve
nue
Toll Increase Toll Decrease 241 Opening Weekly Traffic Potential Weekly Revenue
Traffic
Revenue
Toll Increases
Toll Decreases
241Opening
16
Projected Revenue Covers Costs Using the 91 Express Lanes model:
Congestion management pricing HOV3+ free
I-405 Express Lanes revenue would cover capital, operations, maintenance, debt service
Potential surplus for additional transportation congestion relief, generally within the corridor
17
Next Steps
Public Review Period May 18 - July 17 Key Findings to Board July 23
Outreach Update I-405 Focus Groups
Critical Path (All Alternatives) Program Management – Release RFP July 23 Outreach Consultant – Release RFP July 23
I-405 Options for Board Consideration Aug 13 I-405 Board Locally Preferred Option Sept 24 Final EIR / EIS Spring 2013