+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1. Introduction

1. Introduction

Date post: 21-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: chelsi
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Training and Certification for Construction Inspectors Erica Thompson and Eric Marks, P.E., and Dr. Jochen Teizer, Ph .D. Rapids Construction Safety & Technology Laboratory School of Civil and Environmental Engineering . Erica Thompson [email protected]. 1. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
1
www.postersession.com 1. Introduction Benefits (per course): 1) Decrease travel time (85 hrs) 2) Cost savings ($2,466) 3) Personnel planning improved time management Limitations: • Security logistics • Frequency of certification • Bypass courses for experienced inspectors Training and Certification for Construction Inspectors Erica Thompson and Eric Marks, P.E., and Dr. Jochen Teizer, Ph.D. Rapids Construction Safety & Technology Laboratory School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Erica Thompson [email protected] du 4. Methodology Primary Objectives 1) Provide recommendations for best inspection practices for transportation construction infrastructure projects 2) Create a delivery system for construction inspector training/certification materials Provided best inspection practices and training for GDOT construction Investigated current inspection practices for highway, roadway, and br Compared existing inspection practices and recommended new inspection Created self-paced collection of instructional modules and certificati Developed self-paced web-based training/certification system for const Highway Transportation Infrastructure is currently underfunded (FHWA 2011) Construction inspectors are required to perform 4 times the workload of inspectors in 1978 (FHWA 2011) Construction inspectors are an important asset to any DOT because they provide quality assurance on transportation infrastructure construction projects GDOT currently lacks a system to transfer knowledge from experienced inspectors to new employees Quality training and certification need to be available for GDOT inspectors 6. Conclusion The purpose is for State Department of Transportations (DOTs) to provide innovative ways in implementing training and certification opportunities for construction inspectors. Importance of Construction Inspectors: Inspectors provide quality assurance of construction projects Increase in transportation infrastructure projects Major Problems: Lack of consistent certification method Limited number of experienced and knowledgeable construction inspectors Goals: Create best practices for construction inspection Create training and certification modules for construction inspectors 2. Background Available Training Methods: 1) Live instructor (central office) 2) Live instructor (district office) 3) Webinar 4) Self-paced and web-based Evaluation Metrics: 1) Cost 2) Time 3) Quality 4) Implementation Strategy 5) Ease of Updating Information M anual Clarity forRoad Surface Preparation State Very Good Good Average Poor Very Poor N/A 1. Alabam a X 2. Arkansas X 3. Florida X 4. Georgia X 5. Kentucky X 6. Louisiana X 7. M innesota X 8. M ississippi X 9. New York X 10. North Carolina X 11. South Carolina X 12. Tennessee X 13. Texas X 14. Virginia X 15. W estVirginia X Research Flowchart Comparison Chart for Evaluation 3. Objective 5. Results
Transcript
Page 1: 1. Introduction

www.postersession.com

1. Introduction

Benefits (per course): 1) Decrease travel time (85 hrs)2) Cost savings ($2,466)3) Personnel planning improved time managementLimitations:

• Security logistics• Frequency of certification• Bypass courses for experienced inspectors

Training and Certification for Construction Inspectors

Erica Thompson and Eric Marks, P.E., and Dr. Jochen Teizer, Ph.D. Rapids Construction Safety & Technology Laboratory

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Erica [email protected]

4. Methodology

Primary Objectives

1) Provide recommendations for best inspection practices for transportation construction infrastructure projects

2) Create a delivery system for construction inspector training/certification materials

• Provided best inspection practices and training for GDOT construction inspectors• Investigated current inspection practices for highway, roadway, and bridge projects• Compared existing inspection practices and recommended new inspection procedures • Created self-paced collection of instructional modules and certification exams• Developed self-paced web-based training/certification system for construction inspectors

• Highway Transportation Infrastructure is currently underfunded (FHWA 2011) • Construction inspectors are required to

perform 4 times the workload of inspectors in 1978 (FHWA 2011)

• Construction inspectors are an important asset to any DOT because they provide quality assurance on transportation infrastructure construction projects

• GDOT currently lacks a system to transfer knowledge from experienced inspectors to new employees

• Quality training and certification need to be available for GDOT inspectors

6. Conclusion

The purpose is for State Department of Transportations (DOTs) to provide innovative ways in implementing training and certification opportunities for construction inspectors.

Importance of Construction Inspectors:• Inspectors provide quality assurance of

construction projects• Increase in transportation infrastructure

projectsMajor Problems: • Lack of consistent certification method• Limited number of experienced and

knowledgeable construction inspectorsGoals:• Create best practices for construction

inspection• Create training and certification

modules for construction inspectors

2. Background

Available Training Methods:1) Live instructor (central office)2) Live instructor (district office)3) Webinar4) Self-paced and web-based

Evaluation Metrics:1) Cost2) Time3) Quality4) Implementation Strategy5) Ease of Updating Information

Manual Clarity for Road Surface PreparationState Very Good Good Average Poor Very Poor N/A

1. Alabama X2. Arkansas X3. Florida X4. Georgia X5. Kentucky X6. Louisiana X7. Minnesota X8. Mississippi X9. New York X10. North Carolina X11. South Carolina X12. Tennessee X13. Texas X14. Virginia X15. West Virginia X

Research Flowchart

Comparison Chart for Evaluation

3. Objective

5. Results

Recommended