1
IRAK1 serves as a novel regulator essential for LPS-induced IL-10 gene expression
Yingsu Huang, Tao Li, David C. Sane, and Liwu Li*
Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157 Key words: Innate immunity, LPS, IRAK1, Stat3, IL-10, atherosclerosis * Correspondence: Dr. Liwu Li Department of Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston Salem, NC 27157 Phone: 336-716-6040 Fax: 336-716-1214 Email: [email protected]
JBC Papers in Press. Published on October 12, 2004 as Manuscript M410369200
Copyright 2004 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
2
ABSTRACT Being one of the key kinases downstream of TLR receptors, IRAK1 has initially thought to be
responsible for NFκB activation. Yet IRAK1 knockout mice still exhibit NFkB activation upon LPS
challenge, suggesting that IRAK1 may play other uncharacterized function. In this report, we show
that IRAK1 is mainly involved in Stat3 activation and subsequent IL-10 gene expression. Splenocytes
from IRAK1 deficient mice fail to exhibit LPS-induced stat3 serine phosphorylation and IL-10 gene
expression, yet still maintain normal IL-1 β gene expression upon LPS challenge. Mechanistically, we
observe that IRAK1 modification upon LPS challenge leads to its modification, nuclear distribution
and interaction with stat3. IRAK1 can directly use Stat3 as a substrate and cause Stat3 serine 727
phosphorylation. In addition, nuclear IRAK1 binds directly with IL-10 promoter in vivo upon LPS
treatment. Atherosclerosis patients usually have elevated serum IL-10 levels. We document here that
IRAK1 is constitutively modified and localized in the nucleus in the peripheral blood mononuclear
cells from atherosclerosis patients. These observations reveal the mechanism for the novel role of
IRAK1 in the complex TLR signaling network, and indicate that IRAK1 regulation may be intimately
linked with the pathogenesis and/or resolution of atherosclerosis.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
3
INTRODUCTION
Innate immunity signaling mediated by Toll-like-receptors (TLRs) leads to the expression of a wide
variety of genes (1-4). Numerous transcription factors including Nuclear factor -κB (NFκB),
Activator protein-1 (AP-1), Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), and Signal transducers and activators
of transcription (Stats) are shown to be activated upon challenges with various TLR ligands (4). The
mechanism for the selective activation of distinctive transcription factor is not clearly understood, and
may be caused by the differential recruitment of intracellular adaptor molecules such as MyD88,
Mal/TIRAP, TRIF, and TRAM as well as the downstream IRAK kinases (4).
IRAK1 was the first IRAK family kinase being identified to be associated with the intracellular
domain of IL-1 receptor (5). Since TLRs share the TIR domain with IL-1 receptor, it was
hypothesized that IRAK1 may also participate in TLR mediated signaling. Subsequent works
including ours have confirmed that indeed various TLR ligands can activate endogenous IRAK1
kinase activation (6-9). Biochemically, we and others have shown that IRAK1 undergoes covalent
modification likely due to phosphorylation and ubiquitination upon IL-1 or LPS challenge (7;10;11).
IRAK1 can form a complex with MyD88, as well as TRAF6 (6). Since the most apparent downstream
target of LPS signaling is the activation of NFκB, IRAK1 is the apparent candidate to fulfill such role.
Therefore, IRAK1 has historically been linked with IL-1/LPS mediated NFκB activation. Yet the
majority of published evidence supporting the role of IRAK1 in mediating IL-1/LPS-induced NFκB
activation has been derived from studies employing cell lines with IRAK1 overexpression (12-14).
Upon overexpression, both the wild type and the kinase-dead IRAK1 (which has a point mutation in
the ATP-binding pocket [K239S] or in the catalytic site [D340N]) can strongly induce NFκB reporter
activation (12;14). The fact that despite being an active kinase, its kinase activity is not required for
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
4
its function raises the concern that IRAK1 may perform other novel unidentified function besides
activating NFκB.
Three related IRAK genes have been later identified, namely IRAK2, IRAK-M, and IRAK4
(13;15;16). All IRAKs consist of a conserved N-terminal death domain and a central kinase domain.
Upon overexpression, each of these IRAKs can activate the NFκB reporter gene, suggesting that they
may play redundant roles in activating NFκB (13;17). However, studies using transgenic mice have
indicted otherwise. So far, IRAK1-/-, IRAK4-/- and IRAK-M-/- transgenic mice have been generated.
Mice with IRAK4 disruption exhibit marked reduction in NFκB activation upon LPS challenge (18).
Furthermore, sequence comparison with the fly IRAK counterpart pelle kinase suggests that IRAK4 is
the structural orthologue of fly pelle kinase (16). These studies and analyses indicate that IRAK4 is
the default kinase responsible for activating NFκB. In contrast, deletion of IRAK-M was shown to
lead to elevated NFκB activity and pro- inflammatory gene expression such as TNF α, indicating that
IRAK-M may negatively regulate NFκB activation (19). Intriguingly, IRAK1 deficient mice still
retain LPS induced NFκB activation (20), suggesting that IRAK1 may rather fulfill other distinct yet
un-identified function in LPS/TLR signaling. Besides NFκB activation, TLR ligands such as LPS can
also activate other transcription factors such as IRFs and Stats (21;22). Whether and which particular
IRAK participates in the activation of IRFs and/or Stats is not clear.
In this study, we have characterized the gene expression pattern of murine splenocytes from wild type
and IRAK1 deficient mice. We have found that IL-10 induction is severely compromised in IRAK1
deficient cells upon LPS challenge. In contrast, IL-1 β gene expression is induced to a similar extent.
Since Stat3 has been shown to be critical for IL-10 gene expression, we have further studied the Stat3
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
5
activation and phosphorylation status. We have observed that IRAK1 deficient cells exhibit defective
nuclear Stat3 serine-727 phsophorylation. Furthermore, we have shown that LPS induces IRAK1
modification and nuclear localization. In addition, nuclear IRAK-1 interacts with Stat3 as well as
endogenous IL-10 promoter element upon LPS treatment.
IL-10 is undetectable in normal healthy human sera or blood cells. However, under many pathological
circumstances such as atherosclerosis, IL-10 message and protein can be readily detectable in the sera
(23). The production of IL-10 may help alleviate excessive inflammation and therefore be beneficial
for the resolution of atherosclerosis. We have examined the IRAK1 status in the peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from healthy and atherosclerosis patients. Our study shows that
IRAK1 is constitutively modified and localizes inside the nucleus in atherosclerosis patient blood
monocuclear cells (PBMC). Our finding reveals a novel role of IRAK1 in specifically mediating LPS-
induced Stat3 activation and IL-10 expression.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
6
MATERIALS AND METOHDS Reagents. E. coli 0111:B4 LPS was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Antibody against IRAK1
was from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Antibodies against Stat3, Phospho-Stat3(Ser727),
Phospho-Stat3(Tyr705) was from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). Murine and human IL-10 enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were from BenderMed Systems (Austria).
Mice: C57BL/6 wild type mice were purchased from the Charles River laboratory. IRAK-deficient
mice were a kind gift from Dr. James Thomas from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical
School. These mice were bred and maintained in the animal facility at the Wake Forest University
School of Medicine with the approved ACUC protocol. All mice were 7-10 weeks of age when
experiments were initiated. Splenocytes were harvested as described (24).
Human blood peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation and culture: Blood was
drawn from healthy donors and atherosclerosis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary
interventions at the Wake Forest University Medical Center with an approved protocol. Peripheral
blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated by Ficoll density gradient as described (25). Isolated
PBMC were washed twice with PBS and incubated in RPMI 1640, supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS,
100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml of streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine.
RNA isolation and real-time quantitative PCR: Total cellular RNAs were extracted using the
TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen life technologies, CA)(26). Isolated total RNAs were reverse transcribed
using the Qmniscript TMRT Kit (QIAGEN). Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of IL-10, IL-1 β, as
well as the control GAPDH mRNA transcripts were carried out using the assay-on-demandTM gene-
specific fluorescently labeled TaqMan MGB probe in an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System
(Applied Biosystems).
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
7
Tansient transfection and luciferase reporter activity assay: Hela-MAT cells stably expressing
TLR4/MD2 (27) were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin,
100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine. A total of 2 x 105 cells were co-transfected using
DMRIE-C reagent (Invitrogen life technologies, CA) with the pIL-10Luci reporter plasmid (0.2 µg)
and 1 µg of either wild-type Stat3, Stat3-S727A, or Stat3-Y705A mutant plasmids (kindly provided by
Dr. James Darnell, the Rockefeller University). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were
stimulated with LPS at 500 ng/ml. Four hours later cells were harvested and the lyses were used to
perform lueiferase assay (26).
In vitro transcription/translation and phosphorylation assay of Stat3: Wild type IRAK1, wild
type and Stat3-S727A mutant proteins were synthesized using the pflag-IRAK1, wild type Stat3 and
Stat3-S727A mutant plasmid with the Promega TNT quick coupled transcription/translation system
(Promega, WI). In vitro synthesized IRAK1 was incubated with either Stat3 or Stat3-S727A protein at
37oC for 30 minutes in 50 µl kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM β-
glycerophosphate, 20 mM para-nitrophenylphosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1
mM benzamidine). Reaction products were separated on SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF
membrane. The phosphorylated as well as total Stat3 proteins were visualized by Western blot using
antibodies specific for either Stat3-S727P or total Stat3 protein.
Isolation of cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts, immunoprecipitation, and Western blot: Cell lysis,
isolation of total, cytoplasmic, and nuclear extracts were as described (28). Briefly, various cells (5 x
106/ml) were washed in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9 and subsequently lyzed on ice in the lysis buffer (10
mM HEPES, pH7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCL, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF,
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
8
1µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin). After centrifugation for 3 min at 12,000 rpm, the supernatant
cytoplasmic fractions were transferred and saved. Pellets containing intact nuclei were lyzed and
solubilized with the high salt buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 M NaCl, 0.2mM
EDTA, 0.5mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF) for 30 minutes, and yielded the nuclear extracts.
Immunoprecipitation and western detection of corresponding proteins were performed as described (7).
Chromatin immunoiprecipitation assay. Fresh and LPS stimulated cells were fixed by adding
formaldehyde (HCHO, from a 37% HCHO/10% methanol stock (Calbiochem) into the medium for a
final formaldehyde concentration of 1%, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. with gentle
shaking. Incubation with the Lysis Buffer was extended to 20 min. at 4°C. The chromatin was sheared
by sonication using a Branson 250 sonicator with microtip at a power setting of 2 and 40% duty cycle.
The samples were placed on ice for 1 min. between sonication bursts. Each condition was divided into
two samples, providing a pre-immunoprecipitation or “input” sample that was not incubated with
specific antibodies, and an immunoprecipitated “IP” sample that was incubated overnight with
antibodies specific for IRAK1 (Upstate Biotechnology Lake Placid, NY). Pre-immune IgG was used as
a negative control. DNA was isolated by phenol/chloroform extraction, ethanol precipitated and re-
suspended in 20µl of dH2O. 4 µl of immunoprecipitated DNA was used for each polymerase chain
reaction (PCR). The following primers specific for the IL-10 promoter -300 to -60bp region were used:
5' CAG CTG TTC TCC CCA GGA AA 3’ and 5' AGG GAG GCC TCT TCA TTC AT 3'. PCR
products were separated on 1% agarose gel. The amplified band was visualized using Bio-Rad Gel
DocTM .
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
9
Data Analysis: The significance of the data was evaluated by means of one factor ANOVA followed
by Student-Newman-Keuls test using SPSS 10.0 software. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
10
RESULTS
IRAK1 is critical for IL-10 gene expression. To identify potential downstream gene targets of
IRAK-1, we prepared total RNAs from wild type and IRAK1 deficient splenocytes treated with or
without LPS. Isolated RNAs were then used to perform cDNA microarray analysis using the
Affymetrix mouse chip U74v2, and the data analyzed using the Affymetrix 4 and genespring data
analysis software. We observed that several typical pro-inflammatory genes under the control of
NFκB such as IL-1 β and TNF α were induced to similar levels by LPS in both wild type and IRAK1
deficient splenocytes. In contrast, we identified that IL-10 message was only induced by LPS in wild
type, but not IRAK1 deficient splenocytes.
In order to confirm the microarray data, we performed real time PCR analysis of the induced IL-10 as
well as IL-1 β messages. Total RNAs isolated from wild type and IRAK1 deficient mice with or
without LPS treatment were reverse transcribed into cDNAs, and subsequently subjected to real time
PCR analysis using the Assay-on-Demand IL-10, IL-1 β, and the control GAPDH primer sets
purchased from Applied BiosystemsTM. GAPDH message levels remain steady in all the samples
assayed. IL-10 message levels were undetectable after 40 cycles of amplifications in resting
splenocytes from wild type as well as IRAK1 deficient mice. Upon LPS challenge, there was
significant induction of IL-10 message in the wild type splenocytes (figure 1a). Based on the
comparative Ct method, the induction of IL-10 by LPS was greater than at least 30 fold. In contrast,
there was no statistically significant difference between IL-10 message levels in resting and LPS
treated splenocytes from IRAK1 deficient mice (figure 1a). On the other hand, we observed that IL-1
β message levels were induced to the similar extent in wild type and IRAK1 deficient splenocytes by
LPS (figure 1b). The amplified IL-10, IL-1 β and GAPDH mRNAs were also resolved and visualized
on agarose gel (figure 1c). Subsequently, we measured IL-10 protein levels by ELISA. Wild type,
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
11
instead of IRAK1 deficient splenocytes produced significant amount of IL-10 protein upon 16 hour
LPS treatment (figure 1d).
Stat3 serine phosphorylation necessary for IL-10 gene expression requires the presence of
IRAK1. LPS-induced IL-10 gene expression has been shown to be mediated largely by Stat3 (22).
Stat3 activation is achieved through phosphorylation at the serine 727 and tyrosine 705 residues (29).
To clarify that Stat3 phosphorylation indeed is critical for LPS induced IL-10 gene transcription, we
co-transfected Hela-MAT cells stably carrying the TLR-4/MD-2 gene (27) with the IL-10 promoter
reporter plasmid pIL-10Luci (22) together with various Stat3 expression constructs. As shown in
figure 2, LPS induced IL-10 reporter gene activation in cells co-transfected with wild type Stat3
construct. In contrast, there was no induction of IL-10 reporter activity in cells co-transfected with
Stat3 S727A or Y705A mutant, confirming that serine 727 as well as tyrosine 705 phosphorylation is
essential for Stat3 mediated IL-10 gene transcription.
We then examined the Stat3 phosphorylation status in wild type and IRAK1 deficient splenocytes.
Splenocytes from wild type and IRAK1 deficient mice were treated with LPS. Total protein extracts
were harvested and separated on SDS-PAGE. Total Stat3 as well as phosphorylated stat3 were
monitored by Western blot using anti-Stat3 and anti-phospho-Stat3 antibodies. As shown in figure 3,
LPS induced Stat3 phosphorylation at both serine 727 and tyrosine 705 residues in wild type
splenocytes. In contrast, LPS only induced Stat3 tyrosine phosphorylation, but failed to induce serine
727 phosphorylation in IRAK1 deficient splenocytes (figure 3a). We further fractionated the cell
extracts into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. Total Stat3 was present in both the cytoplasmic and
nuclear fractions of splenocytes from wild type and IRAK1 deficient mice (figure 3b). LPS induced
dramatic increase of nuclear Stat3 serine 727 phsophorylation in the wild type splenocytes.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
12
Strikingly, serine-727-phosphorylated Stat3 was completely absent in the nuclear fraction from
IRAK1 deficient splenocytes (figure 3b).
We also examined whether IRAK1 could directly phosphorylate Stat3 serine 727. Wild type Stat3,
Stat3-S727A mutant, as well as IRAK1 proteins were synthesized via in vitro transcription/translation
as described in the Materials and Methods. In vitro kinase assays were performed by mixing IRAK1
protein with either wild type Stat3 or Stat3-S727A mutant protein in the kinase buffer at 37C.
Reaction products were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Total and S727 phosphorylated Stat3 proteins were
detected through Western blot using anti-Stat3 and anti-Stat3-S727 antibodies. As shown in figure 3c,
IRAK1 can directly cause Stat3 serine 727 phosphorylation.
IRAK1 and Stat3 form a novel complex in the nucleus. IRAK1 is known to undergo modification
such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination upon IL-1 and/or LPS challenge. Intriguingly, it has been
noted that IL-1β treatment may induce IRAK1 to localize inside the nucleus (30). To further
determine the molecular mechanism for IRAK mediated Stat3 activation, we analyzed IRAK1 protein
status upon LPS challenge. Wild type splenocytes treated with or without LPS were harvested and
used to prepare whole cell extract, cytoplasmic extract, as well as nuclear extract as described in the
methods. The purities of prepared extracts were confirmed by probing for the presence of
cytoplasmic and nuclear specific proteins. As shown in figure 4a, GAPDH was only detectable in the
cytoplasmic extract, while Lamin-B was only visible in the nuclear extract. β-actin was visualized to
show equal loading of corresponding extracts. Equal amounts of isolated cellular extracts were
subsequently used to immunoprecipitate IRAK1 protein. Immunoprecipitated IRAK1 was subjected
to SDS-PAGE and western blotted with anti-IRAK1 antibody. As shown in figure 4b, LPS challenge
caused a major shift of IRAK1 migration from ~85KD to ~100KD, corresponding to the covalent
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
13
IRAK1 modification likely due to ubiquitination and phosphorylation as reported by others (12). We
then examined the subcellular distribution of IRAK1 upon LPS challenge. Strikingly, as shown in
figure 4b, un-modified IRAK1 (~85KD) was only detectable in the cytoplasmic extract, and
completely absent in the nuclear extract. In contrast, modified IRAK1 was primarily present in the
nuclear extract (figure 4b).
We next asked whether IRAK1 could form a complex with endogenous Stat3. Immunoprecipitated
IRAK1 complex from the cytoplasmic as well as nuclear extracts were separated on SDS-PAGE,
transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-Stat3 antibody. As shown in figure 4c, Stat3
was only detected in the IRAK1 immunoprecipitated complex obtained from the nuclear extract.
Furthermore, the intensity of co-immunoprecipitated Stat3 in the nucleus increased dramatically from
the samples treated with LPS. We further performed immunoprecipitation of Stat3 using the
cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts. As shown in figure 4c, Stat3 existed in both the nuclear and
cytoplasmic fractions. The total Stat3 levels remained steady in resting as well as LPS treated
splenocytes. Consistently, the modified IRAK1 (100KD) was present in the immunoprecipitated Stat3
complex in the nuclear fraction upon LPS treatment (figure 4c).
Modified IRAK-1 resides in the nuclear fraction of the human peripheral blood mononuclear
cells as well as the monocytic THP-1 cells. We subsequently examined the IRAK1 status in human
primary blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as well as the THP-1 cells. As shown in figure 5, IRAK1
underwent modification upon LPS treatment in THP-1 cells (figure 5a) as well as in human primary
PBMC (figure 5b). Furthermore, modified IRAK1 primarily localized in the nuclear fraction. Similar
to the finding observed in mice splenocytes, modified IRAK1 formed a complex with the endogenous
Stat3 in the nucleus upon LPS challenge (figure 5a, b).
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
14
IRAK1 binds directly to the endogenous IL-10 promoter region. Since IRAK1 is distributed into
the nucleus and interacts with Stat3 upon LPS challenge, and its presence is critical for IL-10 gene
expression, we hypothesized and tested that IRAK1 may interact with the IL-10 promoter element.
IL-10 promoter region responsive to LPS challenge has been previously mapped to the -300 to -60bp
region (22). We therefore performed chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (Chip) to test whether
IRAK1 can bind with this region in vivo. THP-1 cell treated with and without LPS were fixed with
1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes and subjected to Chip assays as described in the methods. As shown
in figure 6, there was no binding of IRAK1 to the IL-10 promoter element in the resting cells.
Strikingly, LPS induced binding of IRAK1 to the endogenous IL-10 promoter region based on Chip
assay.
Blood cells from atherosclerosis patients have elevated IRAK1 modification and constitutive IL-
10 expression. Inflammation has been well noticed to be intimately linked with the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis (31). Elevated IL-10 levels have been detected in human sera from atherosclerosis
patients (23). The presence of IL-10 may be a self-protective mechanism to prevent excessive
inflammation. The mechanism for elevated IL-10 expression in human atherosclerosis patients is not
clear. We indeed found that the sera from 11 atherosclerosis patients all exhibited detectable IL-10
protein based on ELISA (~5pg/ml). In contrast, there was no detectable IL-10 in healthy human sera.
We further isolated PBMC from healthy as well as patient blood. The expression levels of IL-10
protein were determined by ELISA. As shown in figure 7a, PBMC from patients constitutively
secreted IL-10 protein. Based on our finding that IRAK1 plays a critical role in the induction of IL-
10, we therefore compared the IRAK1 status in the PBMC from healthy donors and atherosclerosis
patients. As shown in figure 7b, IRAK1 primarily exists as the modified 100KD form in the patient
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
15
PBMC. We further obtained the cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from patient PBMC, and analyzed
the distribution of IRAK1. IRAK1 protein was immunoprecipitated from the prepared extracts, and
separated on SDS-PAGE. The presence of IRAK1 was subsequently monitored through Western blot
using anti-IRAK1 antibody. As shown in figure 7c, the modified IRAK1 protein was constitutively
migrated as the modified 100 KD form and resided exclusively in the nuclear fraction from the patient
PBMC.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
16
DISCUSSION
Our current study has presented evidence indicating that IRAK1 plays a novel and critical role in Stat3
mediated IL-10 gene expression. IRAK1 is essential for Stat3 serine 727 phosphorylation. IRAK1
forms a complex with Stat3 as well as the IL-10 promoter element in the nucleus upon LPS challenge.
Furthermore, atherosclerosis patients exhibit constitutive nuclear distribution of modified IRAK1 in
their peripheral blood mononuclear cells, in concert with constitutively elevated blood IL-10 levels.
This report has revealed some novel biochemical aspects of IRAK1 protein regulation. It is known
that IRAK1 undergoes covalent modification such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination upon IL-1
and/or LPS challenge (7;10;12). Its modification may eventually lead to its subsequent degradation
(11). Using human THP-1 cells, primary blood mononuclear cells, as well as mice splenocytes, we
have confirmed numerous previous studies that there are indeed two signature forms of IRAK1, one
being the unmodified 85KD form, and the other being modified (phosphorylated and/or ubiquitinated)
100KD form. In consistent with previous studies, upon LPS challenge, we have observed that the
level of the modified IRAK1 form increases, while the unmodified form decreases. With regard to its
subcellular distribution, there is only one published report showing that IL-1 β stimulation may lead to
IRAK1 nuclear localization (30). Yet this report has been largely ignored by the field. In this study,
we further analyzed the distribution of IRAK1 in the fractionated cellular and nuclear extracts.
Strikingly, the majority of the 85KD form exists in the cytoplasm fraction. In sharp contrast, the
modified IRAK1 is mainly present in the nucleus. We have also noticed from the previous study
reporting IRAK1 nuclear localization that the apparent molecular weight of nuclear IRAK1 is
~100KD, consistent with our present finding. However, the authors of that report did not elaborate in
their publication the different migration patterns of nuclear and cytoplasmic IRAK1 (30). The fact
that the modified IRAK1 primarily appears inside the nucleus suggests that LPS-induced IRAK1
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
17
modification such as phosphorylation and/or ubiquitination may be critical for its trafficking into the
nucleus and its subsequent function in activating IL-10 gene expression. Indeed increasing evidence
have shown that protein modification such as ubiquitination and/or sumoylation are critical for
subcellular trafficking as well as signal transduction besides proteasome-mediated degradation (32).
Further biochemical work is needed to elucidate the exact mechanism for LPS-induced IRAK1
modification and its subsequent function.
Functionally, our findings serve to clarify the elusive role of IRAK1 in LPS mediated innate immunity
signaling. As described in the introduction, although overexpression of IRAK1 may lead to NFκB
reporter activation, studies using IRAK1 deficient mice have indicated that LPS can still induce NFκB
activation in IRAK1 deficient cells (20). Therefore, IRAK1 may perform other unidentified role
besides NFκB activation. Our data presented herein unveils that IRAK1 is critically involved in the
nuclear Stat3 serine phosphorylation and subsequent IL-10 gene expression. It has been documented
that Stat3 is responsible for increased IL-10 gene expression upon LPS challenge (22). LPS can
induce Stat3 phosphorylation at both serine 727 and tyrosine 705 residues (22), and Stat3
phosphorylation at both Y705 and S727 are critical for its maximum transcriptional activity (29). Our
observation herein concurs with these studies. Overexpression of Stat3 with serine 727 to alanine
mutation or tyrosine 705 to phenylalanine mutation fails to mediate LPS induced IL-10 gene reporter
activity (figure 2). Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) has been shown to be the main kinase responsible for Stat3
tyrosine phosphorylation (33). Till to date, the mechanism for LPS induced Stat3 serine 727
phosphorylation is not clear. In consistent with previous reports, we have documented that LPS can
induce Stat3 S727 and Y705 phosphorylation in wild type murine splenocytes. Strikingly, we have
observed that although LPS-induced Y727 phosphorylation is normal, LPS-induced Stat3 S727
phosphorylation is greatly compromised in IRAK1 deficient splenocytes (figure 3). Furthermore, we
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
18
have observed that nuclear Stat3 serine phosphorylation is completely absent in IRAK1 deficient
splenocytes. In contrast, there is an increase in nuclear Stat3 serine phosphorylation in wild type
splenocytes upon LPS challenge. The increased Stat3 serine phosphorylation inside the nucleus upon
LPS challenge correlates well with our observation that LPS facilitates IRAK1 and Stat3 interaction
inside the nucleus. We have documented in this report such interaction using mice splenocytes,
human THP-1 cells, as well as human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, our in vitro
analyses indicate that IRAK1 can directly use Stat3 as its substrate and induce Stat3 serine 727
phsophorylation. This is one of the first evidence revealing the biological substrate of IRAK1. Taken
together, our data indicate that IRAK1 is essential for Stat3 serine phosphorylation inside the nucleus.
Although our study agrees with others that Stat3 phosphorylation is critical for IL-10 gene expression,
there is another novel aspect of our present finding. It was thought that upon stimulation with various
ligands, Stat3 is phosphorylated and then enters the nucleus (34). Our data consistently indicate that
Stat3 is constitutively localized in the cytoplasm as well as the nucleus. LPS stimulation induced
dramatic increase of nuclear Stat3 serine 727 phsophorylation in the wild type splenocytes, without
affecting the total Stat3 protein levels in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Therefore, the function of Stat3
serine phosphorylation may not be involved in the Stat3 nuclear entry, but rather, is critical for LPS-
induced IL-10 transcriptional regulation inside the nucleus.
Besides activating Stat3 which is critical for IL-10 gene expression, our study also reveals the
intriguing phenomenon that IRAK1 may directly serve as a transcriptional regulator for IL-10 gene
transcription. Using the Chip assay, our present study presents compelling evidence showing that
endogenous nuclear IRAK1 can specifically bind with IL-10 promoter element in vivo upon LPS
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
19
challenge (figure 6). Further detailed studies are warranted to decipher the mechanism for IRAK1
binding with the IL-10 promoter element and subsequent regulation of IL-10 gene expression.
IL-10 expression is completely absent in healthy human blood cells. However, it has long been
noticed that IL-10 levels are elevated in the blood sera of atherosclerosis patients. Elevated IL-10
levels may be a self-protective mechanism preventing excessive inflammation and limiting the
progression of atherosclerosis. The mechanism for the increased IL-10 gene expression is not clear.
Our data indicate that IRAK1 protein in the atherosclerosis patient blood samples is constitutively
modified and localized in the nucleus. Elevated IRAK1 modification and nuclear localization may
lead to elevated IL-10 gene expression.
Taken together, the data presented in this study provide a novel role for the IRAK1 molecule in
activating Stat3 and contributing to IL-10 gene expression, and dispel the notion that IRAK1 primarily
serves a redundant role in activating NFκB. Furthermore, constitutive IRAK1 modification and
nuclear localization may be intimately linked with either the progression or resolution of
atherosclerosis.
Acknowledgement
We thank Cynthia Hickman for help with the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, Abbie Connoy for
help with the mice splenocyte isolation, and Jean Hu for her excellent technical assistance. This work
is supported in part by the National Institute of Health Grant AI50089 to L.L.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
20
REFERENCES 1. Vogel, S. N., Fitzgerald, K. A., and Fenton, M. J. (2003) Mol.Interv. 3, 466-477
2. Akira, S. (2001) Adv.Immunol. 78, 1-56
3. Aderem, A. (2001) Crit Care Med. 29, S16-S18
4. Beutler, B., Hoebe, K., Du, X., and Ulevitch, R. J. (2003) J.Leukoc.Biol. 74, 479-485
5. Cao, Z., Henzel, W. J., and Gao, X. (1996) Science 271, 1128-1131
6. Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P., Kopp, E., Stadlen, A., Chen, C., Ghosh, S., and Janeway, C. A., Jr. (1998) Mol.Cell 2, 253-258
7. Li, L., Cousart, S., Hu, J., and McCall, C. E. (2000) J.Biol.Chem. 275, 23340-23345
8. Moors, M. A., Li, L., and Mizel, S. B. (2001) Infect.Immun. 69, 4424-4429
9. Jacinto, R., Hartung, T., McCall, C., and Li, L. (2002) J.Immunol. 168, 6136-6141
10. Yamin, T. T. and Miller, D. K. (1997) J.Biol.Chem. 272, 21540-21547
11. Li, X., Commane, M., Jiang, Z., and Stark, G. R. (2001) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 98, 4461-4465
12. Li, X., Commane, M., Burns, C., Vithalani, K., Cao, Z., and Stark, G. R. (1999) Mol.Cell Biol. 19, 4643-4652
13. Wesche, H., Gao, X., Li, X., Kirschning, C. J., Stark, G. R., and Cao, Z. (1999) J.Biol.Chem. 274, 19403-19410
14. Maschera, B., Ray, K., Burns, K., and Volpe, F. (1999) Biochem.J. 339 ( Pt 2), 227-231
15. Muzio, M., Ni, J., Feng, P., and Dixit, V. M. (1997) Science 278, 1612-1615
16. Li, S., Strelow, A., Fontana, E. J., and Wesche, H. (2002) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 99, 5567-5572
17. Qin, J., Jiang, Z., Qian, Y., Casanova, J. L., and Li, X. (2004) J.Biol.Chem. 279, 26748-26753
18. Suzuki, N., Suzuki, S., Duncan, G. S., Millar, D. G., Wada, T., Mirtsos, C., Takada, H., Wakeham, A., Itie, A., Li, S., Penninger, J. M., Wesche, H., Ohashi, P. S., Mak, T. W., and Yeh, W. C. (2002) Nature 416, 750-756
19. Kobayashi, K., Hernandez, L. D., Galan, J. E., Janeway, C. A., Jr., Medzhitov, R., and Flavell, R. A. (2002) Cell 110, 191-202
20. Swantek, J. L., Tsen, M. F., Cobb, M. H., and Thomas, J. A. (2000) J.Immunol. 164, 4301-4306
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
21
21. Fitzgerald, K. A., Rowe, D. C., Barnes, B. J., Caffrey, D. R., Visintin, A., Latz, E., Monks, B., Pitha, P. M., and Golenbock, D. T. (2003) J.Exp.Med. 198, 1043-1055
22. Benkhart, E. M., Siedlar, M., Wedel, A., Werner, T., and Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. (2000) J.Immunol. 165, 1612-1617
23. Mallat, Z., Heymes, C., Ohan, J., Faggin, E., Leseche, G., and Tedgui, A. (1999) Arterioscler.Thromb.Vasc.Biol. 19, 611-616
24. Feldmann, K., Sebald, W., and Knaus, P. (2002) Eur.J.Immunol. 32, 1393-1402
25. Mueller, L. P., Yoza, B. K., Neuhaus, K., Loeser, C. S., Cousart, S., Chang, M. C., Meredith, J. W., Li, L., and McCall, C. E. (2001) Shock 16, 430-437
26. Li, T., Hu, J., and Li, L. (2004) Mol.Immunol. 41, 85-92
27. Re, F. and Strominger, J. L. (2002) J.Biol.Chem. 277, 23427-23432
28. Gomez-Angelats, M. and Cidlowski, J. A. (2003) Cell Death.Differ. 10, 791-797
29. Wen, Z., Zhong, Z., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1995) Cell 82, 241-250
30. Bol, G., Kreuzer, O. J., and Brigelius-Flohe, R. (2000) FEBS Lett. 477, 73-78
31. Ross, R. (1999) Am.Heart J. 138, S419-S420
32. Pickart, C. M. (2001) Mol.Cell 8, 499-504
33. Levy, D. E. and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (2002) Nat.Rev.Mol.Cell Biol. 3, 651-662
34. Schindler, C., Shuai, K., Prezioso, V. R., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1992) Science 257, 809-813
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
22
FIGURE LEGENDS Fig.1. Selective suppression of IL-10, not IL-1 β expression in IRAK1 deficient splenocytes. (a) LPS only induced IL-10 mRNA expression in splenocytes from wild type, not IRAK1 deficient mice. Primary splenocytes were either left untreated or treated with LPS for 4 hours. Cells were collected to examine the expression of IL-10 as well as GAPDH mRNAs by real-time PCR. (b) IL-1 β mRNA was induced to the similar levels by LPS in both wild type and IRAK1 deficient splenocytes. Primary splenocytes were treated as described in a. The expression of IL-1β and GAPDH mRNAs was analyzed. (c) The amplified IL-10, IL-1 β and GAPDH mRNAs were visualized on agarose gel. (d) LPS-induced IL-10 protein production from splenocytes was suppressed in IRAK1 deficient mice. Splenocytes from wild type and IRAK1 deficient mice were treated with LPS for 16 hours or left untreated. Supernatants were collected and IL-10 protein levels were quantified by ELISA. *P<0.05 vs WT, #P<0.05 vs IRAK1-/-. All points represent the mean and standard deviation from three different experiments. Fig.2. Stat3 serine phosphorylation is essential for LPS induced IL-10 gene transcription. Hela-MAT cells were co-transfected with an IL-10-luciferase promoter-reporter plasmid (pIL-10Luci) and Stat3 wild-type or Stat3 S727A, Stat3 Y705F mutant plasmid. Cells were then stimulated with LPS for 4 hours. Results were presented as fold induction compared with cells without LPS treatment. *P<0.05 vs Stat3. All points represent the mean and SE from three different experiments. Fig.3. Stat-3 serine phosphorylation is compromised in IRAK1 deficient splenocytes. (a) LPS fails to induce serine 727 phosphorylation in IRAK1 deficient splenocytes. Splenocytes from wild type and IRAK1 deficient mice were treated with LPS for 4 hours. Whole cell lysates were collected and immunoblot analyses were performed with anti-Stat3, Phospho-Stat3(Ser727) and Phospho-Stat3(Tyr705) antibodies. (b) LPS induces nuclear Stat3 serine 727 phsophorylation in the wild type but not IRAK1 deficient splenocytes. Primary splenocytes were treated as described in a. Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were prepared and used to immunoprecipitate Stat3. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed for Stat3 serine 727 and total Stat3. The results are representative of three independent experiments. (c) IRAK1 can directly phosphorylate Stat3 Serine727. IRAK1, wild type Stat3, and Stat3-S727A mutant proteins were synthesized using the Promega TNT Quick Coupled transcription/translation system. In vitro synthesized IRAK1 was incubated with either Stat3 or Stat3-S727A protein at 37oC for 30 minutes in 50 µl kinase buffer. Reaction products were separated on SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membrane. The phosphorylated as well as total Stat3 proteins were visualized by Western blot using antibodies specific for either Stat3-S727P or total Stat3 protein. Fig.4. LPS induces IRAK1 modification, nuclear entry, and interaction with Stat3 in murine splenocytes. (a) The prepared cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts are devoid of cross contamination. Whole cell, cytoplasmic as well as nuclear fractions were subjected to Western blot using anti-GAPDH, anti-Lamin-B and β-actin. GAPDH and Lamin-B are cytoplasmic and nuclear markers respectively. β-actin is used as a marker of total amount of proteins per lane. (b) LPS induces IRAK1 modification, nuclear entry in murine splenocytes. Splenocytes from wild type mice were left untreated or treated with LPS for 4 hours. Whole cell, cytoplasmic as well as nuclear fractions were collected and used to perform immunoprecipitation with anti-IRAK1 antibody. Immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-IRAK1. (c) LPS induces IRAK1 interaction with Stat3 in the nuclear fraction. Immunoprecipitated IRAK1 complex from the cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
23
subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Stat3 antibody. Subsequently, immunoprecipitated Stat3 complex were probed with anti-Stat3 as well as IRAK1. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Fig.5. IRAK1 interacts with Stat-3 in the nucleus upon LPS challenge in human THP-1 cells as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells. (a) IRAK1 interacts with stat-3 in the nucleus upon LPS challenge in human THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells were treated with LPS for 1 hour or left untreated. Whole cell, cytoplasmic as well as nuclear fractions were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRAK1 and Western blotted with anti-IRAK1. Subsequently, immunoprecipitated IRAK1 complex from the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were used to perform immunoblot using anti-Stat3 antibody. (b) IRAK1 interacts with stat-3 in the nucleus upon LPS challenge in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The cells were left untreated or treated with LPS for 1 hour. Whole cell, cytoplasmic as well as nuclear fractions were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRAK1 and Western blot with anti-IRAK1 or Stat3. Subsequently, immunoprecipitated IRAK1 or Stat3 complex were immunoblotted with either anti-Stat3 or anti-IRAK1 as indicated. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Fig.6. IRAK1 binds with endogenous IL-10 promoter element. THP-1 cells were treated for 2 hours with 500ng/ml LPS. The cell extracts were analyzed for the IRAK1 binding to the IL-10 promoter element by Chip assay using anti-IRAK1. The presence of amplified IL-10 promoter sequence was determined by PCR. One of three experiments is shown. Fig.7. Elevated IL-10 levels and IRAK1 modification in blood cells from atherosclerosis patients. (a) IL-10 level is constitutively high in atherosclerosis patients. PBMC from healthy donors or atherosclerosis patients were incubated in culture medium for 16 hours. Supernatants were collected and IL-10 productions from PBMCs were quantified by ELISA. *P<0.05 vs healthy. All points represent the mean and S.E. from six different experiments. (b) IRAK1 primarily exists as the modified 100KD form in the patient PBMC. Whole cell lysates from healthy or atherosclerosis patients PBMCs were collected. Immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-IRAK1 antibody. (c) Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions extracted from atherosclerosis patients PBMCs were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRAK1 and Western blotted with anti-IRAK1 or anti-Stat3. Results are representative of three independent experiments.
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Yingsu Huang, Tao Li, David C. Sane and Liwu LiIRAK1 serves as a novel regulator essential for LPS-induced IL-10 gene expression
published online October 1, 2004 originally published online October 1, 2004J. Biol. Chem.
10.1074/jbc.M410369200Access the most updated version of this article at doi:
Alerts:
When a correction for this article is posted•
When this article is cited•
to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alertsClick here
by guest on April 3, 2018
http://ww
w.jbc.org/
Dow
nloaded from