+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea...

1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea...

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: tamsyn-watson
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
19
1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS Laurent BRUNETTI Franck CADOUX Claude GIRARD Fabien FORMOSA Direct impact of acoustic noise on the vibrations of a free-fixed beam
Transcript
Page 1: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

1

LAViSta

Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation

Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN

Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS Laurent BRUNETTI

Franck CADOUX Claude GIRARD Fabien FORMOSA

Yan BASTIAN Nicolas GEFFROY

Direct impact of acoustic noise on the vibrations of a free-fixed beam

Page 2: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

2

INTRODUCTION

Three primary sources of noise : Ground motion

Acoustic noise

Direct force disturbances

Direct force disturbances : forces applied directly to the payload, as cooling systems in the magnets of the two last quadruples

Ground motion : well studied at LAPP

Acoustic noise : studied recently at LAPP

Goal of this presentation : To show first results on the impact of acoustic noise on the displacement of a free-fixed beam

Page 3: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

3

Outline

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

2. Behaviour of the beam under different levels of acoustic noise

3. General conclusion and future prospects

Page 4: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

4

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Introduction

Like a pink noise : random signal with PSD inversely proportional to the frequency

Acoustic pressure ASD measured by a microphone in a quiet working room :

Page 5: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

5

Comparison of beam vibrations subject to two different levels of acoustic noise :

Low acoustic level : Measurements done in the quiet room

Acoustic level higher : Same conditions than previously but with the pink noise

Principle of the study

Simulation of a much noisier working room acoustic noise by creating an acoustic pink noise with a loudspeaker

Check that the ground motion is the same during the study

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Page 6: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

6

Experimental setup

ENDEVCO accelerometers Frequency range : [0.01Hz; 100Hz]

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Loudspeaker

Microphone Frequency range : [6Hz; 100Hz]

Page 7: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

7

Amplitude spectral density of acoustic pressure

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Creation of an acoustic noise only above 23Hz with the loudspeaker

Impossibility for the loudspeaker to create a pink noise

Majority of power at high frequencies

Outside accelerometers frequency range

Page 8: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

8

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Acoustic pressure RMS

With the loudspeaker : 9dB higher than without it

Difference significant ?

Page 9: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

9

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Acoustic pressure RMS

4453dB Difference not significant

Loudspeaker not powerful enough below 100 Hz : majority of power concentrated at high frequencies

Page 10: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

10

Source of the working room acoustic noise (No loudspeaker)

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Coherence Ground/Acoustic pressure : Peaks of coherence

Often the same sources between acoustic noise and ground motion

Coherence Beam/Acoustic pressure : more peaks of coherence

Excitation of the beam by acoustic noise : not always the same source

than ground motion

Page 11: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

11

Source of the slightly higher working room acoustic noise simulated

Coherence Ground/Acoustic pressure : very low

Loudspeaker well isolated from the ground : good!!

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Coherence Beam/Acoustic pressure : high

Beam well excited by the loudspeaker

Page 12: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

12

Impact of the loudspeaker on the vibrations of the beam

Above 23.4Hz : Vibrations of the beam higher with the loudspeaker

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Page 13: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

13

Impact of the loudspeaker on the vibrations of the beam

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Impact of acoustic noise on the displacement of a free-fixed beam proved

Small increase of the beam displacement :

0.1nm

Very small increase of acoustic pressure :

44dB53dB

But need to go on with this study to evaluate the importance of this noise

Page 14: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

14

Future prospects

Use of another loudspeaker more powerful able to create an acoustic pink noise at low (below 10Hz) and high frequencies

Displacement RMS performed for different levels of acoustic noise :

- from 7Hz to 100Hz

- from 100Hz to 1000Hz

Estimation of the acoustic noise impact at low and high frequencies

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Contrary to ground motion, acoustic noise high at high frequencies :

Use of high sensitivity accelerometers measuring up to 1000Hz

Page 15: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

15

Principle of the study

Comparison of beam vibrations for different levels of this sinusoidal acoustic noise

Pink noise : loudspeaker not enough powerful below 100Hz

Sinusoidal acoustic noise of 70Hz used to excite the beam

Majority of power concentrated at this frequency

Check that the ground motion is the same during the study

2. Behaviour of the beam under different levels of acoustic noise

Page 16: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

16

Experimental setup

ENDEVCO accelerometers Frequency range : [0.01Hz; 100Hz]

1. Free-fixed beam under indoor environmental acoustic noise

Loudspeaker

Microphone Frequency range : [6Hz; 100Hz]

Page 17: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

17

Behaviour of the beam subject to different levels of acoustic noise

Linearity of the beam displacement with the

acoustic pressure

Stationarity of the ground motion

2. Behaviour of the beam under different levels of acoustic noise

Experimental set-up well imagined

Page 18: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

18

75dB75dB

Small increase of acoustic pressure

42dB

12dB

Non negligeable displacement of

the beam

2. Behaviour of the beam under different levels of acoustic noise

Behaviour of the beam subject to different levels of acoustic noise

Page 19: 1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.

19

General conclusion and future prospects

Small increase of acoustic pressure Increase of the beam displacement non negligible

Non negligible impact of acoustic noise on the displacement of the beam proved

Other future prospects :

Acquisition of an acoustic enclosure to put the free-fixed beam in

In a linear collider, acoustic noise very important :

Need to go on with the study of acoustic noise

Excitation on a predictive model : only ground motion

Maybe should include acoustic noise


Recommended