+ All Categories
Home > Technology > 1 lieberman-ecec2012 - bioremediation 05-10-2012

1 lieberman-ecec2012 - bioremediation 05-10-2012

Date post: 22-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: hanoi-university-of-technology
View: 220 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
28
May 10, 2012 Bioremediation - How microbes are used to clean up DOD Installations Traditional Environmental Services Innovative Solutions & Technologies Chemical Petroleum Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Utilities Land Development
Transcript
  • 1. May 10, 2012Bioremediation - How microbes are used to clean upDOD InstallationsTraditional InnovativeEnvironmental ServicesSolutions & Technologies Chemical Petroleum Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Utilities Land Development

2. Overview Who is Solutions-IES? Brief History of Remediation Technology Bioremediation basics Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination Project Examples New Technologies & Emerging Contaminants 3. Who is Solutions-IES, Inc.?Full service environmental company Formed in Raleigh in 1999 Licensed Engineering and Geology firm Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB) Certified 8(a) DB firm North Carolina HUB DCAA approved accounting system Serving DoD and private industry Providing both traditional and innovative solutions 4. Historical Perspective(1980s to 2000) Pump & Treat Dig & Haul Energy & Capital intensive Transfer contaminationbetween medium Difficult to reach closure 5. Historical Perspective(mid-1990s to mid-2000s) In Situ Treatment Technologies Physical: Air Sparge; Soil Vacuum Extraction (SVE); In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO); Fe0 walls Biological: Biosparge; Biovent; Oxygen and Nutrient Addition; Substrate Addition; Biobarriers 6. Current Perspective(mid-2000s to now) Optimization Sustainability Emerging Contaminants Chlordane 1,4-Dioxane PFOS/PFOA Low Permeability Zones 7. Typical Remediation Costs Surfactant Co-solvent Flushing*$385/yd3 Chemical Oxidation*$125/yd3 Thermal Treatment*$88/yd3 Stabilization $15-80/yd3 Dig and Haul $4-10/yd3 + T&D Pump & Treat Enhanced Bioremediation*$29/yd3*From: McDade, Travis and Newell, 2005 8. In Situ BioremediationIn SituBioRemediationIn PlaceMicrobialMethod to Fix Biological agents (bacteria, fungi, plants, or their enzymes) used to clean up pollution in the environment. Reference: Lisa Alvarez-Cohen, Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Berkeley, Earth Science Division, LBNL 9. How Does It Work?Growth-Promoting Biological Reduction++ Electron DonorElectron Acceptor Waste Products Energy (Food) (something to breathe) [CO2, N2, FeS2, Cl-][O2, NO3-, SO42-, TCE, etc.](Drawing Modified from AFCEE and Wiedemeier) 10. Applying In Situ Bioremediation Natural Biostimulation Bioaugmentation Attenuation Have HaveNeedMicrobes MicrobesMicrobes Have foodHave food Need food andand or nutrients nutrientsnutrients 11. Anaerobic Bioremediation Target Contaminants Chlorinated Organics Ethenes (PCE, TCE) Ethanes (TCA) Methanes (CT) Petroleum Hydrocarbons Aromatic Hydrocarbons Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX) Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) Nitrate, Perchlorate, Chromate Explosives (TNT, RDX, HMX) Acid Mine Drainage 12. How Does It Work? 13. Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination In Situ anaerobic bioremediation Injected into contaminated aquifer Source zone and/or PRB treatment The organic substrate: Develops an anaerobic and reducing treatment zone Generates hydrogen through fermentation reactions Stimulates microbial growth and metabolism of contaminants of concern 14. Dehalococcoides ethenogenes Multiple strains (BAV1, 195, VS, MB, FL2) Obligate anaerobe Disc-shaped; spontaneous motility Prefers neutral pH environment Complete dechlorination to VC & ethene Grows slowly; prefers life in consortium Uses acetate for C source; H2 as electron donor Can use chloroethenes, chlorophenols and PCBs as terminal electron acceptors. 15. AECTarheel Army Missile PlantBurlington, NCIn Situ Bioremediation of TCE 16. Tarheel Army Missile Plant1944 1992 GOCO Facility 1993 Soil and groundwater contamination discovered(BTEX and TCE) 1995 AS/SVE placed in operation 1999 P&T initiated NW corner 2003 Guaranteed fixed price bids from multiplevendors 2004 Army selects Solutions-IES to perform work 2004 AS/SVE system turned off andSolutions-IES begins EOS injection 17. Costs (in $1,000) Pilot FullVendorProcess - Reagent Total(GFP)(Est.)NAMNA 0 250250Solutions-IES ERD - EOS 256 728984Magnus pHACometabolic- C3H8 321 894 1,215Cl-SolutionsCometabolic- Cl-Out 3731,141 1,515Arcadis ERD - molasses3391,456 1,795Electro-Petroleum AS with CO2 2911,763 2,054Regenesis ERD - HRC 4751,645 2,120Geo-Cleanse ISCO - Fenton 2812,411 2,692 18. TAMP Site ConditionsSource area 100 x 100Existing AS/SVE System Oxidative conditionsChlorinated Solvents 2 4 mg/L 19. Regulatory ChallengesGroundwater Reinjection Recovered groundwater is a waste Innovative below-ground reinjection systemBioaugmentation First approved use of DHCbioaugmentation in NC 20. TAMP - Summary EOS effectively distributed throughout treatment area Quickly established favorable geochemistry for reductivedechlorination TCE reduced to below detection (


Recommended