Date post: | 28-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | rosa-fields |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Middle East Performance Measurement & Benchmarking Conference
Challenges of Measurements in
Service Industry
21st to 22nd June 2004, Dubai
Sunil ThawaniManager – TQM Department
Union National Bank, Abu [email protected]
2
Purpose of PresentationPurpose of Presentation
Concepts and unique features of Service Quality;
Service Quality model; Causes of service quality problems; Challenges of measurement in Service
Quality; Establishing service quality performance
standards and Benchmarking.
3
Service IndustriesService Industries
Retailing; Distribution; Financial services – banking, insurance; Hotels and tourism; Leisure, recreation, entertainment; Professional and business services like
accountancy, marketing, law, consulting; Healthcare; Software etc.
4
Growth of goods and services exports, 1980-2000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Pe
rce
nta
ge
(1
98
0=
10
0)
0
1500
3000
4500
6000
7500
9000
10500
12000
Bill
ion
$
Goods Services
Services growth
Goods growth
GDP growth
5
Share of commercial services and goods in world trade, 1980-2000
Goods
84%
16%Services 1980
2000Services19%
81%
Goods6
6
Service Industry - Facts
Service industries generate over 2/3rd of GNP and employment in developed countries - ISSN Journal Volume 22,
2004) 9 out of 10 jobs are created by Services economy –
“Delivering Service Quality” by Valerie, Parsuraman and Leonard”;
Of the top 100 revenue earners worldwide, 55% are service firms – www.service-growth.com
Top service firm in revenue worldwide – Wal-Mart is a service firm;
Service firms produced 45% more revenue per employee than manufacturing firms;
8
What Makes Service Quality UniqueWhat Makes Service Quality Unique
1. Service is intangible - it cannot be easily measured, tested and verified in advance of sales to assure quality;
2. Services are perishable;3. Precise standards like manufacturing can rarely be
set;4. It is created and consumed simultaneously or near
simultaneously; Service Production and Consumption are often inseparable i.e. Customer is in service factory.
9
What Makes Service Quality UniqueWhat Makes Service Quality Unique
6. Services offered can vary from “Producer to Producer” e.g. outlet to outlet;
7. Outcome of Service is as important as process of delivery; assessment of quality is made during the service delivery process.
8. Service Quality is more difficult for customer, to evaluate, than product quality;
9. Customer cannot retain the actual service. The effect of the service can be retained.
11
Word of Mouth
Perceived Service Quality
Personal Needs
Perceived Service.
Past Experience
External Cummications
Expected Service
Customers' Assessment of Service Quality
“Delivering Service Quality” by Valerie, Parsuraman and Leonard”
12
Service Quality GapService Quality Gap
The gap between expected and perceivedservice is a measure of service quality Expectation > Service perceived =
Exceptional Quality, Expectations < Service perceived =
Unacceptable quality. Expectations = Service perceived =
Satisfactory Quality.
14
Word of Mouth
Perceived Service Quality
Personal Needs
Perceived Service.
Past Experience
External Cummications
Expected Service
Customers' Assessment of Service Quality
Dimensions of Service Quality
TangiblesReliability
ResponsivenessCompetence
CourtesyCredibilitySecurityAccess
CommunicationUnderstanding the
Customer
15
Reliability" Ability to perform the promised service dependably & accurately"
Competence"Possession of the required
skills and knowledge to perform the service"
Responsiveness"Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service"
Definition of Dimensions
16
Security"Freedom from danger, risk, or
doubt"
Access"Approachability and ease of
contact"
Communication"Keeping Customers informed
in language they can understand and listening to
them"
Definition of Dimensions
17
Dimension MeasurementsDimension Measurements
Reliability – On time delivery performance, Errors in invoices
Responsiveness – Cycle time (speed)
Access – Availability (24x7), Downtime of web
Credibility – Financial Ratings, Image
Mix of Performance Indicators and Perception Measures
19
Gap 1Gap 1Customer Expectations
(Expected Service)
Managements Perception of Customer Expectations
1. Lack of Market Research Orientation;
2. Inadequate upward communication;
3. Too many levels of management
20
Gap 2Gap 2
Service Quality Specifications
Management Perceptions of Customer Expectations
1. Inadequate management commitment to Service Quality
2. Perception of infeasibility3. Absence of goal setting
21
Gap 3Gap 3
Service Delivery
Service Quality Specifications
1. Role ambiguity 2. Role conflict3. Poor technology4. Lack of team work5. Poor employee – job fit
22
Gap 4Gap 4
Service Delivery
External Communications
to Customers
1. Propensity to over-promise
2. Inadequate horizontal communication
23
Past ExperiencePersonal Needs
Expected Service
Perceived Service
Service Delivery External communication to consumers
Word-of-mouthCommunication
Converting perceptions into service quality specifications
Management perceptions of consumer expectations
GAP 5
GAP 2
GAP 3
GAP 4
GAP 1
Marketer
Service Provider
25
Performance StandardsPerformance Standards
Qualitative;Quantitative;Benchmark (In line with Customer
expectations).
26
FedEx Service Quality IndicatorFedEx Service Quality Indicator(Quantitative)(Quantitative)
No. of damaged packages; No. of lost packages; Missed pickups; Aircraft delays; Reopened complaints (complaints not solved first time); Wrong day late deliveries; Right day wrong delivery; Abandoned calls; Invoice adjustment requests; Missing proof of deliveries.
28
Challenges of Performance Challenges of Performance MeasurementsMeasurements
Deciding strategy - Customer satisfaction vs. Customer delight;
Developing Service Quality dimensions specific to business needs;
Defining the dimensions; Developing common understanding throughout the
organization - Achieving clear focus & direction; Establishing measurement framework; Utilizing measurements; Benchmark to set targets; Aligning measurement techniques with the
dimensions; Addressing Service Quality Gaps.
29
Quality/ Profit Relationship Quality/ Profit Relationship
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20 40 60 80 100
Return on Sales
Return onInvstmnt
Inferior Superior
Relative Quality
%
Source: Robert Buzell & Bradley Gale, PIMS Principle
30
ConclusionConclusion
Service excellence pays off richly;Superior service quality is proving to be a
winning competitive strategy;Effective and appropriate Measurements
can help achieve Service Excellence;