Date post: | 21-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
1
Monopoly
Chapter 9
© 2006 Thomson/South-Western
2
Barriers to Entry
Sole supplier of a product with no close substitutes
Barriers to entry restrictions on the entry of new firms into an industry Legal restrictions Economies of scale Control of an essential resource
3
Legal Restrictions
Patents award an inventor the exclusive right to produce a good or service for 20 years Provide the stimulus to turn an invention into a
marketable product, a process called innovation
Governments often confer monopoly status by awarding a single firm the exclusive right to supply a particular good or service
4
Exhibit 1: Economies of ScaleC
os
t p
er u
nit
Quantity per period
$
Long-run average cost
Monopoly emerges when a firm experiences economies of scale as reflected by the downward-sloping, long-run average cost curve
5
Economies of Scale
Market demand is not great enough to permit more than one firm to achieve sufficient economies of scaleA single firm will emerge from the competitive process as the sole seller in the market.
6
Control of Essential Resources
Control over some nonreproducible resource critical to productionProfessional sports teams Alcoa was the sole U.S. maker of aluminum for
a long period of time because it controlled the supply of bauxite
China is the monopoly supplier of pandasDeBeers controls the world’s diamond trade
7
Demand, Average and Marginal Revenue
De Beers controls the entire diamond market and suppose they can sell three diamonds a day at $7,000 each total revenue of $21,000
Total revenue divided by quantity is the average revenue per diamond which is also $7,000 monopolist’s price equals the average revenue per diamond
8
Exhibit 2: Loss or Gain from Selling One More Unit
$7,000 6,750
3 0
4
Pri
ce p
er D
iam
on
d
1 - carat diamonds per day
D = Average revenue
LOSS
GAIN
By selling another diamond, De Beers gains the revenue from the sale of the 4th diamondTo sell the 4th unit, De Beers must sell all four diamonds for $6,750 each, sacrificing $250 on each of the first three diamonds that could have been sold for $7,000 eachThe loss in revenue from the first three units is $750The net change in total revenue from selling the 4th diamond is $6,750 - $750 = $6,000
9
Exhibit 3: Revenue Schedule
As De Beers expands output, total revenue increases until quantity reaches 15 diamonds when total revenue tops outFor all units of output except the first, marginal revenue is less than price and the gap widens as the price declines because the loss from selling all diamonds at the lower price increases
10
Exhibit 4: Monopoly Demand and Marginal and Total Revenue
(b) Total Revenue
$60,000
0 16 32
Total revenue
$3,750 0
16 32
Marginal revenue
Elastic
Inelastic
Unit elastic
D = Average revenue
1-carat diamonds per day
(a) Demand and Marginal Revenue
Total revenue is maximized when marginal revenue equals zeroWhen demand is elastic, a decrease in price increases total revenue marginal revenue is positiveWhen demand is inelastic, a decrease in price reduces total revenue marginal revenue is negative
$ p
er d
iam
on
dD
oll
ars
1-carat diamonds per day
11
Firm’s Costs and Profit Maximization
Monopolist can choose either the price or the quantity, but choosing one determines the other
Because the monopolist can select the price that maximizes profit, we say the monopolist is a price maker
More generally, any firm that has some control over what price to charge is a price maker
12
Exhibit 5: Short-Run Revenues and Costs for the Monopolist
Price Marginal Marginal Average TotalDiamonds (average Total Revenue Total Cost Total Cost Profit or per day revenue) revenue (MR = Cost ( MC = (ACT = Loss =
(Q) (p) (TR = Q x p) TR / Q) (TC) TC / Q) TC/Q) TR - TC (1) (2) (3) =(1) x (2) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
0 $7,750 0 - $15,000 - - -$15,000
1 7,500 $7,500 $7,500 19,750 4,750 $19,750 -12,250
2 7,250 14,500 7,000 23,500 3,750 11,750 9,000
3 7,000 21,000 6,500 26,500 3,000 8,830 -5,500
4 6,750 27,000 6,000 29,000 2,500 7,750 -2,000
5 6,500 32,500 5,500 31,000 2,000 6,200 1,500 6 6,250 37,500 5,000 32,500 1,500 5,420
5,000 7 6,000 42,000 4,500 33,750 1,250 4,820
8,250 8 5,750 46,000 4,000 35,250 1,500 4,410
10,750 9 5,500 49,500 3,500 37,250 2,000 4,140
12,25010 5,250 52,500 3,000 40,000 2,750 4,000
12,50011 5,000 55,000 2,500 43,250 3,250 3,930
11,75012 4,750 57,000 2,000 48,000 4,750 4,000
9,00013 4,500 58,500 1,500 54,500 6,500 4,190
4,00014 4,250 59,500 1,000 64,000 9,500 4,570 -
4,500 15 4,000 60,000 500 77,500 13,500 5,170 -7,50016 3,750 60,000 0 96,000 18,500 6,000
-36,00017 3,500 59,500 -500 121,000 25,000 7,120
-61,500
Short-run Costs and Revenue for a Monopolist
Profit-maximizing monopolist
produces that quantity where
total revenue exceeds total cost
by the greatest amount
$12,500 per day when output is 10
units per day. Total revenue is
$52,500 and total cost is $40,000MR = MC at
this same level of output
13
Exhibit 6: Monopoly Costs and Revenue
0
MR
Marginal cost
D = Average revenue
Average total cost
$5,250
4,000Profit
a
b
e
Diamonds per day10 16 32
(a) Per-Unit Cost and Revenue
$52,500
40,000
15,000
0 10 16 32
Total revenue
Total costMaximum profit
Diamonds per day
(b) Total Cost and Revenue
The intersection of the two marginal curves at point e in panel (a) indicates that profit is maximized when 10 diamonds are sold. ATC of $4,000 is identified by point b: the average profit per diamond equals the price of $5,250 minus the ATC of $4,000 = $1,250 – the economic profit is the equal to $1,250 * 10 units sold = $12,500 In panel (b), the firm’s profit or loss is measured by the vertical distance between the TR and TC: profit is maximized where 10 diamonds are produced per day
Do
llar
s p
er u
nit
To
tal
do
lla
rs
14
Exhibit 7: The Monopolist Minimizes Losses in the Short Run
p
Marginal cost
Average total cost
Average variable cost
Demand = Average revenue
Marginal revenue
0 Q
e
c
b
a
Loss
Quantity per period
Marginal revenue equals marginal cost at point e. At quantity Q, price p (at point b) is less than average total cost (at point a)The monopolist suffers a loss.But the monopolist will continue to produce rather than shut down in the short run because price exceeds average variable cost (at point c).
Do
llars
per
un
it
15
Long-Run Profit Maximization
If a monopoly is insulated from competition by high barriers that block new entry, economic profit can persist in the long run
A monopolist that earns economic profit in the short-run may find that profit can be increased in the long run by adjusting the scale of the firm
Conversely, a monopoly that suffers a loss in the short run may be able to eliminate that loss in the long run by adjusting to a more efficient size
16
Exhibit 8: Perfect Competition and Monopoly
pm
pc
0 Qm
Quantity per period
c Sc = MC = ATC
D = AR
MRm
m
b
a
Qc
Equilibrium in perfect competition is at point c, where market demand and supply intersect to yield price pc and quantity Qc
Monopolist maximizes profit by equating MR with MC: point b and price pm and output Qm
Consumer surplus is shown by the shaded triangle ampm
Do
llars
per
un
it
17
Exhibit 8: Perfect Competition and Monopoly
p m
p
0 Qm
Quantity per period
c Sc = MC = ATC
D = AR
MRm
m
b
a
c
Qc
Do
llars
per
un
itConsumer surplus under perfect competition is the large triangle acpc while under monopoly it shrinks to the smaller triangle ampm
Consumer surplus has been reduced by more than the profit triangleConsumers have also lost the triangle mcb – the deadweight loss of monopoly – allocative inefficiency arising from the higher price and reduced output
18
Why the Welfare Loss Might Be Lower
If economies of scale are extensive enough, a monopolist may be able to produce output at a lower cost per unit than could competitive firms, thus costs may be lower than under competition
Monopolists may, in response to public scrutiny and political pressure, keep prices below what the market could bear
A monopolist may keep the price below the profit maximizing level to avoid attracting new competitors
19
Why the Welfare Loss Might Be Higher
If resources must be devoted to securing and maintaining a monopoly position, monopolies may involve more of a welfare loss that simple models suggest
Efforts devoted to securing and maintaining a monopoly position are largely a social waste because they use up scarce resources but add nothing to output
20
Why the Welfare Loss Might Be Higher
Activities undertaken by individuals or firms to influence public policy to directly or indirectly redistribute income to them are called rent seeking
Without competition, monopolists may become inefficient
Monopolists are criticized for being slow to adopt the latest production techniques, develop new products, and for generally lacking innovation
21
Price Discrimination
Charging difference prices to different customers when the price differences are not justified by differences in cost
Conditions: Demand curve must slope downward – the firm has
some market power and control over price At least two groups of consumers for the product, each
with a different price elasticity of demand Ability, at little cost, to charge each group a different
price for essentially the same product Ability to prevent those who pay the lower price from
reselling the product to those who pay the higher price
22
Exhibit 9: Price Discrimination
•At a given price, price elasticity of demand (panel b, elastic) is greater than in panel a (inelastic).
23
Perfect Price Discrimination
If a monopolist could charge a different price for each unit sold, the firm’s marginal revenue curve from selling one more unit would equal the price of that unit the demand curve would become the
marginal revenue curveA perfectly discriminating monopolist charges
a different price for each unit of the good
24
Exhibit 10: Perfect Price Discrimination D
oll
ars
pe
r u
nit
c
0 Q Quantity per period
e
D = Marginal revenue
a
Long-runaverage cost= marginal cost
P r o f i t
A perfectly discriminating monopolist would maximize profits at point e, where MR = MC