Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | judith-stone |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Noise valuation: Results
Alistair Hunt and Alberto Longo
University of Bath
EC HEATCO project meeting
19 January 2006, Las Palmas
2
Descriptive Statistics - Survey size
Scenario UK sweden Norway Hungary Germany Spain
% obs % obs % obs % obs % obs % obs
Road traffic noise – Urban 20.21 212 70.63 368 19.77 202 20 200 19.83 204 23.15 200
Road traffic noise – Rural 29.84 313 23.61 123 19.37 198 20 200 19.83 204 23.15 200
Railway noise – Urban 20.88 219 19.47 199 20 200 19.53 201 26.62 230
Railway Noise – Rural 13.44 141 19.28 197 20 200 19.92 205 14.12 122
Random Sample – Urban 8.2 86 3.26 17 6.36 65 10 100 10.98 113 9.03 78
Random Sample – Rural 7.44 78 2.5 13 15.75 161 10 100 9.91 102 3.94 34
total 100 1049 100 521 100 1022 100 1000 100 1029 100.01 864
3
Descriptive Statistics – Characteristics of the Road samples
age male
mean median min max st dev % UK 46.28 44 18 93 15.81 32.51
sweden 42.94 39 18 91 15.36 49.71 Norway 48.02 48 18 99 14.33 51.83
Hungary 49.32 53 18 70 14.75 39.5 Germany 58.57 62 18 87 18.08 49.9
Spain 45.36 44 18 92 17.24 49.8
College or University Single Married/living with someone Divorced/separated Widowed
UK 34.45 19.19 64.24 10.47 6.1 sweden 56.73 36.92 52.5 8.08 2.5 Norway 30.43 15.76 71.06 6.43 6.75
Hungary 32.17 16.67 61.33 9.83 12.17 Germany 8.19 17.17 27.77 46.87 8.19
Spain 16.8 29.88 54.3 6.64 8.98
INCOME mean median obsuk 17668.68 14647 613sweden 23107.28 21440 500Norway 26763.86 24840 596Germany 14721 15000 623Spain 11858 7000 404
4
Descriptive stats - Road (1)Road annoyance levels
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
Pe
rce
nta
ge
UK
Sweden
Norway
Hungary
Germany
Spain
5
Descriptive stats - Road (1)
How much does the risk of road traffic accidents in your neighberhood bother, disturb or annoy you?
05
101520253035404550
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
%
UK
Sweden
Norway
Hungary
Germany
Spain
6
Descriptive Statistics - Road (2)If noise from traffic bothers, disturbs or annoys you, could you say what the consequences are for you?
UK Sweden Norway Hungary Germany Spain
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Find it hard to sleep 28.35 29.72 38.33 36.12 41.27 8.42 Sleep with earplugs 1.38 3.1 1.32 4.08 11.90 3.26 Do not open windows as often as I would if there were no noise 61.61 40.31 47.81 60.82 61.51 57.88
Hard to concentrate and disturbing when reading or working 13.58 6.98 6.64 23.06 26.59 25.27 Disturbing when watching TV or listening to the radio/music 24.8 12.18 14.42 46.94 31.94 38.86
Disturbing when talking in the telephone 10.83 2.33 8.34 28.78 12.50 8.42
Get headaches/migraine 4.53 1.03 3.98 13.67 11.31 4.35
7
Distribution of WTP responses -road
ROAD noise WTP distribution-UK (Euro)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 4 9 29 44 73 95 146
190
293
366
732
1465
1904
8
Distribution of WTP responses -road
ROAD noise WTP distribution-Sweden (Euro)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 5
11
21
26
32
43
54
75
86
10
7
12
9
16
1
21
4
26
8
32
2
42
9
53
6
64
3
10
72
21
44
9
Distribution of WTP responses -road
ROAD noise WTP distrubution-Norway (Euro)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 6 12 37 62 99 124
186
248
373
497
745
994
1242
1863
2484
10
Distribution of WTP responses -road
ROAD noise WTP distribution-Hungary (Euro)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 16 24 40 60 80 100 201 402
11
Distribution of WTP responses -road
RAIL noise WTP distribution-Hungary (Euro)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 2.01 4.02 16.1 24.1 40.2 60.2 80.3 100 161 201 402 602
12
Distribution of WTP responses -roadROAD noise WTP distribution - Germany
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 30 50 80 100
150
200
300
13
Distribution of WTP responses -road
ROAD noise WTP distribution - Spain
0102030405060708090
0 5 10 15 30 50 80 100
200
600
3000
14
Road “No” votesWhy did you vote no, or did not answer the wtp question?
UK Sweden Norway Hungary Germany Spain
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
I am not that bothered, disturbed or annoyed by the road traffic noise that I would pay 28.15 56.76 24.32 40.81 35.70 8.59
I cannot afford to pay 12.04 18.02 9.53 49.12 27.48 8.79
It is more important to reduce other nuisances from road traffic 3.04 19.82 3.02 18.14 3.93 1.37
The noise reducing measures cannot remove my annoyance from road traffic noise 2.32 6.79 1.74 6.55 3.18 0.59
If you live in a city there will be road traffic noise 2.90 25.22 3.33 17.13 8.04 1.95
I am going to move soon 2.46 4.95 2.28 4.79 6.73 1.17
I already pay enough charges and taxes 33.38 38.73 38.95 31.49 23.93 9.77
Government should pay 31.34 29.27 45.46 64.48 22.06 16.21
Those that cause the noise should pay for it 12.33 19.81 9.53 25.19 8.79 2.34
I do not want more roadwork in the street 1.74 3.60 1.43 4.28 2.99 1.17
The question about paying is too difficult to answer 2.17 2.70 1.90 2.02 1.31 0.20
Protesters in orange
15
Econometric model
qyprobabilitmixingWTPfWTP
qyprobabilitmixingyprobabilitwithWTP
1);(~
10*
Mean WTP is thus , where E(WTP) is mean WTP.
WTP* denotes WTP for the entire sample, while WTP denotes WTP for those persons in the sample who hold positive values for the program.
Positive data are analyzed as an interval data model assuming a Weibull distribution of the error terms
16
Road WTP Results (Euro) - UK
mean st error median st error obsFull data 27.86 1.90 15.28 0.64 675No prot 1 55.47 3.78 30.42 1.28 339No prot 2 44.35 3.03 24.32 1.02 412Urban 22.24 1.27 14.37 0.61 298Urban No prot 1 39.93 2.29 25.79 1.10 166Urban No prot 2 29.73 1.70 19.20 0.82 223Rural 31.08 3.46 16.10 1.05 391Rural No prot 1 70.25 7.83 36.38 2.38 173Rural No prot 2 56.53 6.30 29.28 1.92 215
17
Road WTP Results (Euro) - Sweden
mean st error median st error obsFull data 75.87 3.29 43.65 1.25 485No prot 1 98.13 4.26 56.46 1.62 375No prot 2 91.31 3.96 52.54 1.50 403Urban 62.42 2.55 37.91 1.09 368Urban No prot 1 76.31 3.11 46.34 1.33 301Urban No prot 2 68.77 2.81 41.77 1.20 334Rural 103.10 11.26 55.15 3.69 136Rural No prot 1 137.46 15.01 73.53 4.92 102Rural No prot 2 133.53 14.59 71.43 4.78 105
18
Road WTP Results (Euro) - Norway
mean st error median st error obsFull data 98.33 5.45 55.87 2.02 627No prot 1 217.10 12.04 123.35 4.46 284No prot 2 152.99 8.48 86.92 3.14 403Urban 118.46 7.80 70.72 3.21 267Urban No prot 1 227.55 14.99 135.85 6.17 139Urban No prot 2 182.83 12.05 109.15 4.96 173Rural 83.14 7.44 45.39 2.54 357Rural No prot 1 207.56 18.57 113.31 6.34 143Rural No prot 2 130.18 11.65 71.07 3.98 228
19
Road WTP Results (Euro) - Hungary
mean st error median st error obsFull data 14.11 1.68 7.01 0.48 600No prot 1 20.45 2.44 10.16 0.70 414No prot 2 20.45 2.44 10.16 0.70 414Urban 7.39 1.83 3.25 0.42 300Urban No prot 1 17.74 4.39 7.81 1.02 125Urban No prot 2 10.87 2.69 4.79 0.62 204Rural 5.77 0.61 3.26 0.22 300Rural No prot 1 10.19 1.07 5.76 0.39 170Rural No prot 2 8.29 0.87 4.69 0.32 209
20
Road WTP Results (Euro) - Germany
mean st error median st error obsFull data 8.65 0.19 6.48 0.14 623No prot 1 11.82 0.26 8.85 0.19 456No prot 2 11.82 0.26 8.85 0.19 456Urban 11.29 0.28 8.55 0.22 317Urban No prot 1 18.54 0.47 14.05 0.36 193Urban No prot 2 14.61 0.37 11.06 0.28 245Rural 5.54 0.19 4.16 0.14 306Rural No prot 1 9.79 0.34 7.36 0.25 173Rural No prot 2 7.56 0.26 5.69 0.20 224
21
Road WTP Results (Euro) - Spain
mean st error median st error obsFull data 34.29 5.13 14.86 1.15 512No prot 1 49.31 7.38 21.37 1.65 356No prot 2 49.31 7.38 21.37 1.65 356Urban 51.36 10.53 20.13 2.01 278Urban No prot 1 72.11 15.14 28.26 2.89 198Urban No prot 2 72.11 15.14 28.26 2.89 198Rural 19.25 1.10 12.42 0.53 234Rural No prot 1 28.51 1.63 18.39 0.79 158Rural No prot 2 28.51 1.63 18.39 0.79 158
22
Road results - UK
model 1UK t-stat
obs 160loglik -418.56intercept 3.6938 12.82slightannoy 0.3792 1.12modannoy 0.4595 1.40veryannoy 0.776 1.93extannoy 1.2655 3.35decibel Weibull Shape 0.8479
23
Road results - Sweden
model 1 model 3sweden t-stat sweden t-stat
obs 268 268loglik -622.85 -619.09intercept 6.4228 37.56 3.6287 3.51slightannoy 0.2505 1.22 0.2859 1.41modannoy 0.8086 3.71 0.7927 3.70veryannoy 0.9981 4.19 0.9269 3.93extannoy 1.585 5.56 1.6309 5.80decibel 0.043 2.73 Weibull Shape 0.9141 0.9308
24
Road results - Norway
model 1 model 2 model 3Norway t-stat Norway t-stat Norway t-stat
obs 200 138 138loglik -503.43 -350.8 -344.8432intercept 6.6602 20.26 7.6808 7.25 6.6339 6.36slightannoy 0.8253 2.30 0.8718 2.17modannoy 1.4256 3.88 1.4748 3.56veryannoy 1.108 3.02 1.0018 2.44extannoy 1.0379 2.18 1.1804 2.29decibel -0.0002 0.00 -0.0048 0.28 Weibull Shape 0.8493 0.8295 0.8762
25
Road results - Hungarymodel 1
hungary t-statobs 103loglik -224.123intercept 8.3508 17.94slightannoy -0.0555 -0.10modannoy 0.3077 0.58veryannoy 0.9786 1.91extannoy 1.0857 1.98decibel Weibull Shape 0.7813
26
Road results - Germanymodel 1 model 2 model 3germany t-stat germany t-stat germany t-stat
obs 88 88 88loglik -176.6441 -177.7 -175.8257intercept 4.4959 5.01 4.1271 39.97 2.0833 1.00slightannoy -0.6562 -0.70 -0.7472 -0.79modannoy -0.5219 -0.57 -0.5009 -0.55veryannoy -0.2808 -0.30 -0.3514 -0.39extannoy -0.2705 -0.30 -0.5145 -0.56decibel 0.0345 1.28notannoyed 0.3688 0.41 Weibull Shape 1.1168 1.1141 1.1222
27
Road results - Spainmodel 1 model 2SPAIN t-stat SPAIN t-stat
obs 120 119loglik -272.2753 -277.84intercept 4.115 13.26 4.819 30.08slightannoy 1.1813 3.14modannoy 0.4159 0.95veryannoy -0.1647 -0.36extannoy 0.3864 0.80notannoyed -0.7281 -1.98 Weibull Shape 0.7325 0.68
28
Road results (Euro)mean median obs
Sweden annoyance 1 Full data 38.06 24.43 485Sweden annoyance 1 No prot 1 49.22 31.59 375Sweden annoyance 1 No prot 2 45.80 29.40 403Sweden annoyance 2 Full data 48.89 31.38 485Sweden annoyance 2 No prot 1 63.23 40.58 375Sweden annoyance 2 No prot 2 58.84 37.76 403Sweden annoyance 3 Full data 85.43 54.83 485Sweden annoyance 3 No prot 1 110.49 70.91 375Sweden annoyance 3 No prot 2 102.81 65.99 403Sweden annoyance 4 Full data 103.26 66.27 485Sweden annoyance 4 No prot 1 133.54 85.71 375Sweden annoyance 4 No prot 2 124.26 79.75 403Sweden annoyance 5 Full data 185.69 119.18 485Sweden annoyance 5 No prot 1 240.16 154.14 375Sweden annoyance 5 No prot 2 223.48 143.43 403
29
Pooled data - Road
Full zeros positive no prot1 no prot2obs 3572 2633 939 1981 2682% 1 0.74 0.26 0.47 0.35
full prot 1 prot 2mean wtp 37.08 66.85 49.38st error 1.36 2.44 1.81median wtp 18.82 33.93 25.06st error 0.40 0.72 0.53
30
Pooled data - Roadmodel 1 t-stat model 2 t-stat model 3 t-stat
obs 933 933 896loglikelihood -2247.588 -2214.9 -2120.075intercept 4.6707 48.63 4.0728 2.09 2.9417 7.28germany -0.6423 -4.02 -0.8361 -5.40 -0.7204 -4.23spain -0.3856 -2.62 -0.2242 -1.57 0.1021 0.66norway 0.9644 7.56 1.0053 8.14 0.8285 6.21hungary -1.1298 -6.78 -1.2355 -8.32 -1.0217 -6.24sweden 0.1579 1.32 0.2006 1.74 0.1378 1.10slightly annoyed 0.2997 2.22 0.451 3.12moderately annoyed 0.6694 4.83 0.7072 4.82very annoyed 0.792 5.41 0.8871 5.71extremely annoyed 1.1098 7.04 1.2203 7.26persin/1000 0.012 4.03male 0.1325 1.61age 0.0384 2.15agesq -0.0004 -2.33weibull shape 0.8392 0.8788 0.863
31
Road Analysis: Conclusions
1. High number of respondents with WTP=02. High number of protesters in the UK (50%) and Norway
(54.7%)3. WTP depends
• on annoyance levels in Sweden • on high levels of annoyance in the UK and Hungary on
annoyance (but not different levels of annoyance) in Norway
4. Germany is not WTP for annoyance reduction5. Mixed results for Urban Vs Rural:
• WTP for Urban is less than for Rural in UK, Sweden, Hungary.
6. Pooled results conforms with economic theory
32
Descriptive stats - Rail (1) age male College or University Income of respondent
mean median % % mean median UK 45.63 44 33.53 37.65 19211.0052 14647 Norway 45.73 45 50.62 32.25 28056.159 24840 Hungary 48.18 49 36.75 24.75 Germany 58.23 60 47.29 9.85 14312 15000 Spain 45.12 42 44.88 28.69 11956.61 10000
Single Married/living with someone Divorced/separated Widowed
UK 20.66 60.62 12.87 5.85 Norway 12.94 74.63 7.71 4.73 Hungary 16.75 64 7 12.25 Germany 14.78 73.65 3.69 7.88 Spain 24.15 69.89 1.7 3.98
33
Rail annoyance levels
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
Pe
rce
nta
ge UK
Norway
Hungary
Germany
Spain
34
Descriptive stats - Rail (2)If noise from traffic bothers, disturbs or annoys you, could you say what the consequences are for you?
UK Norway Hungary Germany SpainPercent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Find it hard to sleep 21.04 25.55 44.10 31.77 50.14
Sleep with earplugs 1.02 0.99 3.11 9.36 3.70
Do not open windows as often as I would if there were no noise 46.44 18.61 54.66 38.42 39.49Hard to concentrate and disturbing when reading or working 10.01 7.94 24.84 18.97 23.93
Disturbing when watching TV or listening to the radio/music 18.43 19.6 69.57 30.30 48.72Disturbing when talking in the telephone 7.98 16.87 47.20 15.02 23.36
Get headaches/migraine 3.34 1.24 10.25 6.40 0.00
35
Distribution of WTP responses - rail
RAIL noise WTP distribution-UK (Euro)
0
1020
30
4050
60
7080
90
0 4 9 29 44 73 95 146 190 732
36
Distribution of WTP responses - rail
RAIL noise WTP distribution-Norway (Euro)
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.000 6 12 37 62 99 124
186
248
373
497
745
994
2484
37
Distribution of WTP responses - rail
RAIL noise WTP distribution-Hungary (Euro)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 2.01 4.02 16.1 24.1 40.2 60.2 80.3 100 161 201 402 602
38
Distribution of WTP responses - rail
RAIL noise WTP distribution - Germany
010203040
5060708090
0 5 10 30 50 80 100
150
200
300
600
1000
39
Distribution of WTP responses - rail
ROAD noise WTP distribution - Spain
0102030405060708090
0 5 10 15 30 50 80 100
200
600
3000
40
Rail “No” votesWhy did you vote no, or did not answer the wtp question? UK Norway Hungary Germany Spain Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent I am not that bothered, disturbed or annoyed by the road traffic noise that I would pay 28.65 38.71 36.56 37.80 3.13 I cannot afford to pay 6.23 10.42 39.65 18.45 82.95 It is more important to reduce other nuisances from road traffic 2.14 2.73 11.01 2.38 1.14 The noise reducing measures cannot remove my annoyance from road traffic noise 3.11 2.23 8.81 5.65 0.57 If you live in a city there will be road traffic noise 2.72 3.47 7.93 5.06 0.57 I am going to move soon 0.58 3.23 3.08 7.14 2.84 I already pay enough charges and taxes 14.81 27.05 26.43 19.94 14.49 Government should pay 18.51 42.18 47.58 18.75 10.51 Those that cause the noise should pay for it 7.4 30.77 39.21 16.37 6.82 I do not want more roadwork in the street 1.16 0.74 4.85 0.00 0.00 The question about paying is too difficult to answer 0.19 0.50 3.96 1.19 0.00
41
Rail WTP results (Euro) mean st error median st error obs
UK Full data 15.74 1.14 9.61 0.48 360UK No prot 1 28.61 2.07 17.47 0.87 198UK No prot 2 23.41 1.69 14.30 0.71 242Norway Full data 45.84 3.47 25.91 1.27 403Norway No prot 1 104.95 7.94 59.34 2.91 176Norway No prot 2 62.83 4.75 35.52 1.74 294Hungary Full data 21.39 2.09 10.34 0.57 400Hungary No prot 1 34.64 3.39 16.74 0.92 247Hungary No prot 2 25.24 2.47 12.20 0.67 339Germany Full data 22.79 3.29 11.27 0.92 406Germany No prot 1 39.04 5.63 19.31 1.58 237Germany No prot 2 34.39 4.96 17.02 1.39 269Spain Full data 37.69 3.78 20.20 1.23 352Spain No prot 1 57.94 5.80 31.05 1.89 229Spain No prot 2 42.12 4.22 22.57 1.38 315
42
Rail WTP results - UK model 1 model 2 model 3
UK t-stat UK t-stat UK t-statobs 63 63 63loglik -150.69 -154.82 -155.05intercept 3.7354 10.69 4.1014 24.83 3.9001 13.95slightannoy 0.1163 0.28modannoy 0.7832 1.91veryannoy -0.0268 -0.00extannoy -0.7896 -1.25notannoyed -0.3925 -0.95urban 0.2022 0.62decibel Weibull Shape 0.9646 0.88759
43
Rail WTP results - Norway
model 1 model 5 model 2 model 3 model 4Norway t-stat Norway t-stat Norway t-stat Norway t-stat Norway t-stat
obs 103 103 103 103 90loglik -244.86 -250.63 -249.05 -243.22 -213.18intercept 7.0299 21.00 7.1804 52.27 6.8653 35.30 6.6915 17.95 6.103 4.53slightannoy -0.005 -0.00 0.0626 0.17modannoy 0.3347 0.76 0.507 1.15veryannoy -0.0294 -0.00 -0.0461 -0.10extannoy 1.6924 2.54 1.6389 2.51notannoyed -0.1979 -0.52urban 0.471 1.91 0.4411 1.86decibel 0.0177 0.78 Weibull Shape 0.8808 0.8295 0.9004 0.899
44
Rail WTP results - Hungary
model 1 model 2 model 3Hungary t-stat Hungary t-stat Hungary t-stat
obs 173 173 173loglik -413.63 -416.78 -412.49intercept 9.8122 28.64 9.3199 58.98 10.11 25.74slightannoy -0.8417 -2.01 -1.0082 -2.36modannoy -0.3695 -0.93 -0.5757 -1.39veryannoy -0.8747 -2.25 -0.9943 -2.54extannoy -0.6108 -1.45 -0.699 -1.66urban -0.2282 -1.07 -0.3352 -1.53decibel Weibull Shape 0.7428 0.7198 0.7513
45
Rail WTP results - Germany
model 1 model 2 model 3 model 4 model 5Germany t-stat Germany t-stat Germany t-stat Germany t-stat Germany t-stat
obs 70 70 70 70 70loglik -171.4188272 -168.3582401 -166.67948 1.98 -165.76 -157.04intercept 2.49 2.57 -2.38 -1.17 -4.3047 2.09 3.85 16.72 -5.40 -2.85slightannoy 2.5278 2.26 2.1386 2.19 2.3024 2.64modannoy 2.2008 2.14 2.0505 2.25 2.5085 3.11veryannoy 2.1892 2.16 2.0754 2.21 2.6359 3.30extannoy 2.2337 2.20 2.0397 3.42 2.5258 3.16notannoyedurban 1.3065 4.40 1.3332 5.04decibel 0.0956 3.46 0.0943 3.42 0.0912 3.78 Weibull Shape 0.748 0.8024 0.8239 0.8353 0.9769
46
Rail WTP results - Spainmodel 1 model 2 model 1Spain t-stat Spain t-stat Spain t-stat
obs 82 82 82loglik -189.8437 -190.41 -181.5intercept 4.5672 11.24 4.9862 30.85 5.6948 25.55slightannoy 0.4208 0.82modannoy 0.231 0.45veryannoy 0.6372 1.32extannoy 0.2947 0.57notannoyed -0.4289 -0.97urban -1.2263 -4.61decibel Weibull Shape 0.7932 0.7784 0.904
47
Pooled data - Rail
Full zeros positive no prot1 no prot2obs 1933 1442 491 1222 1535
% 1 0.75 0.25 0.40 0.32
full prot 1 prot 2 obsmean wtp 28.06 44.38 35.33 1933st error 1.69 2.67 2.13median wtp 13.42 21.23 16.90st error 0.45 0.70 0.56
48
Pooled data - Railmodel 1 t-stat model 2 t-stat model 3 t-stat
obs 491 491 446loglikelihood -1189.551 -1187.117 -1056intercept 4.3583 26.08 4.364 17.74 2.681 4.76germany 0.3565 1.55 0.3852 1.60 0.7792 3.17spain 0.5685 2.56 0.6312 2.75 0.487 1.82norway 0.6786 3.21 0.7696 3.58 0.9075 4.24hungary -0.6291 3.23 -0.6076 -3.05 -0.3234 -1.40slightly annoyed -0.1967 -0.77 -0.1781 -0.79moderately annoyed 0.1428 0.63 0.0892 0.40very annoyed -0.144 -0.62 -0.2761 -1.18extremely annoyed 0.0334 0.14 0.0931 0.37persin/1000 0.0031 0.69male 0.2 1.60age 0.0775 3.32agesq -0.0009 -3.76weibull shape 0.7616 0.7677 0.8068
49
Rail Analysis: Conclusions1. High number of WTP=0
2. Rail noise WTP < Road noise WTP, except for Germany
3. High number of protesters: UK 45%, Norway 56%, Hungary 38%, Germany 42%, Spain 35%
4. WTP depends • on annoyance levels in Germany • on high levels of annoyance in Norway
5. WTP does not depend on levels of annoyance in the UK, Hungary, Spain
6. Mixed results for Urban Vs Rural:• WTP for Urban is less than for Rural in Spain • WTP for Urban is more than for Rural in Germany
7. Pooled data confirm that WTP does not depend on annoyance levels
50
Travel timeOccupation
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
UK Sweden Norway Hungary Germany Spain
Self-employed
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
51
Travel timeTransportation mode to work
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
Driver of own orhousehold’s car
Passenger incar
Train Tram Metro Bus
UK Norway
Hungary Germany
Spain
52
Travel timeProb of unexpected delay of 5 mins
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Very likely Quite likely Quite unlikely Very unlikely I don’t know
UK
Norway
Hungary
Germany
Spain
53
Travel time
Journey to workUK Norway Hungary Germany Spain
time 28.57 20.78 40.83 25.07 46.88cost (Euro) 5.71 3.78 1.25 3.63 1.69distance (km) 13.94 20.11 11.63 13.47 6.64All paid by myself 87.68 88.52 86.58 82.34 92.95
54
Travel timeTime Travel 5 Min-UK (Euro)
89.42
2.88 0.96 3.21 0.32 2.24 0.32 0.32 0.320
102030405060708090
100
0.00 0.37 0.51 0.73 1.10 1.46 2.20 2.93 5.13
55
Travel timeTime Travel 10 min-UK(Euro)
82.95
5.25 1.64 4.590.33 2.95 0.33 0.66 0.33 0.66 0.33
0
10
20
30
4050
60
70
80
90
0 0.366 0.513 0.732 1.318 1.465 1.831 2.197 2.929 5.126 10.25
56
Travel timeTime Travel 5 min- Norway (Euro)
81.44
5.15 2.06 1.55 1.03 4.64 0.26 0.26 0.26 1.29 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.520
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0
0.2
5
0.5
0
0.7
5
0.9
9
1.2
4
1.4
9
1.7
4
1.9
9
2.4
8
3.1
1
3.7
3
6.2
1
12
.42
57
Travel timeTime Travel 10 min-Norway (Euro)
78.72
2.93 2.66 0.8 1.65.85
0.27 0.27 0.8 1.86 0.27 1.06 2.13 0.80
102030405060708090
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.99
1.24
1.49
1.74
1.99
2.48
3.11
3.73
6.21
12.4
2
58
Travel time
Time Travel 5 min-Hungary (Euro)
89.77
4.6 2.3 1.28 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.77 0.26 0.260
102030405060708090
100
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.80 1.00 2.01 2.81 4.02
59
Travel time
Time Travel 10 min-Hungary (Euro)
87.24
4.08 3.32 0.77 1.28 0.26 1.53 0.77 0.26 0.510
20
40
60
80
100
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.60
0.80
2.01
2.81
4.02
60
Travel time
Travel time 5 min - Germany
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.0080.0090.00
100.00
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1 1.6
61
Travel time
Travel time 10 min - Germany
89.91
2.75 0.92 3.67 0.92 0.92 0.920
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.4 0.8 1 1.4 2 2.5
62
Travel time
Travel time 5 min - Spain
90.14
0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 2.11 4.93
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.01 0.02 0.3 0.4 1 1.1
63
Travel timeTravel time 10 min - Spain
84.51
1.41 1.41 0.7 1.41 0.7 1.41 3.52 1.41 1.41 0.7 1.410
10
2030
4050
6070
8090
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.2 0.6 1 1.1 1.15 2 2.6 6
64
Travel timeWTP for 5 minutes reduction WTP for 10 minutes reduction
mean median obs mean median obs
UK 0.12 0.10 312 0.20 0.16 312
(0.02) (0.02) (0.03) (0.02)
Norway 0.29 0.19 424 0.48 0.32 424
(0.01) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01)
Hungary 0.06 0.03 400 0.08 0.05 400
(0.01) (0.00) (0.01) (0.00)
Germany 0.03 0.03 275 0.05 0.05 275
(0.01) (0.00) (0.01) (0.01)
Spain 0.22 0.14 145 0.27 0.13 142
(0.05) (0.05) (0.12) (0.03)
St. errors in parenthesis
65
Travel time WTP 5 minutes no protesters 1 WTP 10 minutes no protesters 1
mean median obs mean median obs
UK 0.24 0.20 162 0.34 0.28 179
(0.04) (0.03) (0.05) (0.04)
Norway 0.39 0.26 315 0.62 0.42 325
(0.02) (0.01) (0.03) (0.01)
Hungary 0.19 0.11 126 0.24 0.15 137
(0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01)
Germany 0.06 0.06 135 0.09 0.08 147
(0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01)
Spain 0.33 0.21 97 0.43 0.21 89
(0.08) (0.08) (0.19) (0.05)
66
Travel time WTP 5 mins no protesters 2 WTP 10 mins no protesters 2
mean median obs mean median obs
UK 0.21 0.17 188 0.29 0.24 211
(0.03) (0.03) (0.04) (0.03)
Norway 0.33 0.22 369 0.55 0.37 372
(0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01)
Hungary 0.09 0.05 273 0.13 0.08 265
(0.01) (0.000 (0.01) (0.00)
Germany 0.06 0.06 139 0.09 0.08 154
(0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01)
Spain 0.33 0.21 97 0.43 0.21 89
(0.080 (0.08) (0.19) (0.05)
67
Travel time analysis: Conclusions
• High number of respondents with WTP=0
• Many protesters in UK (43%) and Hungary (66%)
• WTP increases with time saving, as economic theory suggests
• Germany has low WTP compared to other countries