Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | paul-johnson |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Overview of O*NET Data Collection and Activities
OIDAP Meeting
Phil M. LewisDavid R. Rivkin
National Center for O*NET Development
Pam FrugoliEmployment and Training Administration, DOL
May 4, 2011
2
Goals of the Update Briefing
• Overview of O*NET Project
• Data Collection Program– Address OIDAP Questions
• Products & Tools
• O*NET Users
• Special Projects
3
OIDAP Questions
• Please describe how the O*NET data collection strategy builds upon the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) database.
• Are you still using Dun & Bradstreet data to find establishments? Were OES data not able to accomplish this, or is it an efficiency issue?
• What was the original balance between the Establishment Method and the Occupational Expert Method for populating the O*NET database? Has that changed now that you are in maintenance mode? How are the occupational experts identified?
• Can you describe the role of the state workforce development offices in data collection for O*NET? Has this changed over time?
• Why did O*NET decide not to use field analysts to collect the data on occupations?
4
OIDAP Questions (cont.)
• What are the major challenges associated with identifying employees in specific occupations to observe in the field?
• How do Detailed Work Activities differ from Generalized Work Activities in the O*NET? How were they empirically derived?
• We understand that a rule of thumb for statistical sufficiency was set at 15 observations for each domain. Are you still satisfied with that number?
• Are you planning any changes in procedure or content as a result of the recent review of O*NET by the National Research Council?
• How might your sampling parameters change if the results were subject to legal challenge?
• What advice do you have for SSA as they begin to develop an OIS for disability adjudication purposes?
5
Overview of O*NET Project
6
Why O*NET?
1980 Work, Jobs, and Occupations: a Critical Review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (National Research Council)
1993 Final report of the Advisory Panel on the DOT (APDOT)
1999 The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis
2000 O*NET Data Collection Program Survey Pretest
2001 Official OMB approved O*NET data collection using the O*NET survey questionnaires initiated
7
O*NET Project Team
• U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration
• National Center for O*NET Development– North Carolina Employment Security
• RTI; MCNC; HumRRO; NC State University; Maher & Maher
8
National Center for O*NET Development
– Data Collection– Dissemination– Implementation– Research and Development– Technical Assistance/Customer Support
9
What is O*NET?
• A “common language” and dynamic system for describing the world of work for both the public and private sectors
• A comprehensive system for collecting and disseminating information on occupational and worker requirements
10
What is O*NET?
• Flexible competency-based system with emphasis on skills transferability
• Framework for organizing job and worker information
• Data on occupations covering the entire U.S. Economy
11
What is O*NET?
• Uses information technologies to facilitate the collection, storage, and distribution of quality data
• A resource for businesses, educators, job seekers, HR professionals, and publicly funded government programs
12
• The O*NET-SOC Occupational Taxonomy
• The O*NET Content Model
O*NET Structure
13
• SOC mandated by US Office of Management and Budget
• Developed by multi-agency initiative
SOC and O*NET-SOC
14
Key characteristics of U.S. SOC
• Structured for comparability
• Unified classification structure
• Four hierarchical levels to enable data collectors to choose a level of detail corresponding to their needs and ability to collect data on different occupations
15
• O*NET-SOC is a SOC based classification that provides a greater level of detail as needed – O*NET-SOC 2010 taxonomy released December 2010– Currently data collected on 974 O*NET-SOCs
• Adds 269 more specific occupations– New and emerging– Different tasks and KSAs
SOC and O*NET-SOC
16
O*NET Content Model
17
Worker CharacteristicsAbilitiesInterests
Work Styles
Worker CharacteristicsAbilitiesInterests
Work Styles
AbilitiesCognitive
PsychomotorPhysicalSensory
AbilitiesCognitive
PsychomotorPhysicalSensory
CognitiveVerbal
Idea Generation & ReasoningQuantitative
MemoryPerceptual
SpatialAttentiveness
CognitiveVerbal
Idea Generation & ReasoningQuantitative
MemoryPerceptual
SpatialAttentiveness
VerbalOral Comprehension
Written ComprehensionOral Expression
Written Expression
VerbalOral Comprehension
Written ComprehensionOral Expression
Written Expression
Content Model: Sub-Domains
http://www.onetcenter.org/content.html
Scales ReferenceScales Reference
Survey Booklet LocationsSurvey Booklet Locations
Educ, Trng & ExpEduc, Trng & Exp
Level Scale AnchorsLevel Scale Anchors
KnowledgeKnowledge
Job Zone ReferenceJob Zone Reference
Job ZonesJob Zones
Occupation DataOccupation Data
InterestsInterests
Work ContextWork Context
Work ActivitiesWork Activities
Work Context CategoriesWork Context Categories
Educ, Trng & Exp Categories
Educ, Trng & Exp Categories
Work StylesWork Styles
SkillsSkills
O*NET 15.1Database
Occupation Level MetadataOccupation Level Metadata Work ValuesWork Values
Content Model ReferenceContent Model Reference
AbilitiesAbilities
Supplemental Files
• Related Occupations• Crosswalks• Detailed Work Activities• Emerging Tasks• Lay Titles• Tools and Technology• O*NET-SOC 2000 to
O*NET-SOC 2006• Tasks (Release 5.1 File
Layout)• Work Needs
The O*NET Database: Version 15.1
• Occupation data
– Cross-Occupational + Occupation Specific
– 230+ variables
– Importance, level, frequency
– @ 500 ratings per occupation
– @ 3500 metadata per occupation
• Crosswalks• Detailed Work Activities• Emerging Tasks• In-Demand Occupations• Lay Titles• Related Occupations• Tools and Technology• Work Needs
• Crosswalks• Detailed Work Activities• Emerging Tasks• In-Demand Occupations• Lay Titles• Related Occupations• Tools and Technology• Work Needs
Task CategoriesTask Categories
Task RatingsTask Ratings
Task StatementsTask Statements
19
Occupational Level Statistics• O*NET-SOC Establishment Response
Rate• O*NET-SOC Employee Response
Rate• O*NET-SOC Case Completeness Rate• Total Completes for O*NET-SOC
Occupational Level Distribution Statistics• Data Collection Mode• Current Job Tenure• Industry
The O*NET Database: Metadata
Ratings Level Statistics• Confidence Intervals
– Lower and upper 95% bounds
• Standard Deviation
• Standard Error
• Sample Size
• Flags
– Not Relevant for the Occupation
– Recommended Suppression
20
• 874 occupations– Comprehensive data– 359 second update
• 100 occupations– Description, task list, lay titles– Majority also have interests, work values, and tools & technology
O*NET Data Availability
21
• New database released annually– Minimum of 100 occupations updated
• Average currency of all occupations = 2.59 years• Priority established by DOL
– Maximum 5 years-old– Bright Outlook– Green occupations – Linked to technology, math, and science, computers, engineering,
and innovation
O*NET Data Publication Goals
22
O*NET Data Currency
Data Currency Across O*NET-SOC Occupations
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
0-1 years: 2-2.5 years: 3-3.5 years: 4-4.5 years 5 years or more
Number of Years Since Published
Perc
en
tag
e o
f O
ccu
pati
on
s
23
O*NET Data Collection Program
24
O*NET Data Collection Overview
• Proven successful and cost effective methodology designed to collect and yield high quality occupational data
• Multi-method approach to provide flexibility within a framework of standardized procedures
– Establishment, Occupational Expert, Supplemental Frames, Analyst Ratings, Web-Based
• Minimizes public burden and costs
• Approved by Office of Management & Budget (OMB)
25
• Continuous data collection since June 2001– Three successful OMB Clearances
• Comprehensive update by job incumbents and occupational experts of the 2006 O*NET-SOC Taxonomy
• Transition to 2010 O*NET-SOC– New & Emerging occupations
• Unparalleled partnership between Department of Labor and private/public community
• 40,000+ business/organizations• 160,000+ job incumbents/experts• 450+ National Associations
O*NET Data Collection Overview
26
Data Collection Overview (cont.)
• High quality data from a national sample of job incumbents/occupational experts– Strong business participation
• 76% plus response rate
– Strong employee participation• 65% plus response rate
– Strong occupation expert participation• 82% response
27
Data Collection Overview (cont.)
• Web-based case management system used to control all sampling and data collection systems
– Case management, BL contacts with establishments, questionnaire and informational mailings, questionnaire processing, inventory control, etc.
• Finely tuned procedures, systems and infrastructure capable of surveying multiple occupations simultaneously
– Capability developed, tested, and enhanced over 11 years
28
Sources of Occupational Data
• Job Incumbents and Occupation Experts
– Education, Job Titles, Knowledge, Tasks, Work Activities, Work Context, Work Experience, Work Styles
• Occupation Analysts
– Abilities, Skills
• Web-based Research
– Detailed Work Activities, Green, Tasks, Tools and Technologies (T2)
29
Establishment Method
• Two stage sample
– Business establishments - POC
– Job incumbents within business establishments
30
Establishment Method (cont.)
• Job incumbents complete one of three survey questionnaires (25 -30 minutes)– Generalized Work Activities,
Knowledge/Work Styles, or Work Context – Task List– Background Info
• Incumbents choose response option– Paper-and-pencil– Web-based (approximately 25%)
31
Design of Collection Waves
• Identify ~50 primary occupations to target in a sample wave – Wave X.1: Designed to get 34% of sample– Wave X.2: Designed to get 33% of sample– Wave X.3: Designed to get 33% of sample– Wave X.4: Sample residual
32
Design of Collection Waves (cont.)
• Each wave is a cluster of similar occupations– Secondary occupations which are found across
industries are also included to maximize efficiency
• Multiple sub-waves allow for greater precision– Locating occupations– Controlling public burden and project resources
33
Stage One Sampling
• OES data from BLS used to determine the initial industry distribution for each occupation
• Sample business establishments selected from database of business locations
34
Stage One Sampling (cont.)
• OES data from BLS used to determine the initial industry distribution for each occupation– Indicates which industries occupations are employed in
and the share and distribution of occupational employment across industries
– Does not contain information on establishments
35
Stage One Sampling (cont.)
• Industry information for each occupation is refined by O*NET Center analysts– Review and face validity checks
• For example, religious institution sub-section removed from service industry if sampling for bartenders
– Determine industries to include based on overall distribution and population coverage goals
– Refined/target by experience from previous updates, when available
36
Stage One Sampling (cont.)
• Sample business establishments selected from a frame of business locations
– Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) database• ~15 Million establishments
• Info obtained from multiple sources– Tax records, credit reports, telephone directories
• Updated continuously on a monthly basis
• Links to SIC and NAICS industry information
37
Population Coverage
• Gather data on the “core” of the occupation– Where the majority of incumbents
employed
– Average coverage level is 85%
38
Population Coverage (cont.)
Population Coverage for Occupations Collected Via Establishments
0.79%
15.33%
8.78% 9.70% 9.17%
56.23%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
< 50% 50%-60% 60%-70% 70%-80% 80%-90% 90%-100%
Percent Occupations by Population Coverage Level
Pe
rce
nt
of
Oc
cu
pa
tio
ns
39
Stage Two Sampling
• Led by highly qualified O*NET Business Liaisons (O*NET BL)– Full time staff working in dedicated call center– Educational and work experience criteria higher than typical
telephone interviewer
• The sampled establishment’s Point-of-Contact (POC) works with the O*NET BL to identify the a list of eligible employees
• Identification Profiles (ID Profile) are used when asking POC if occupations are present– Helps ensure accuracy in matching employees to occupations
40
Stage Two Sampling (cont.)
• Automated, random selection of job incumbents from the POC’s eligible list
• Limits placed on POC burden– No more than 5 occupations sampled– Never more than 20 employees selected– Can only be included within the data collection once each year
• Selected employees– Asked to complete the questionnaire on their own time– Responses remain anonymous and confidential from both the employer and the
public• Complete via the web or mail back directly• All individual identifiers removed
41
Model-Aided Sampling (MAS)
• Innovative sampling approach that reduces data collection cost and burden to the public by preventing occupations from greatly exceeding their targeted sample – Builds on existing sampling paradigms: traditional and model
based– For each occupation, a targeted sample size for specific
demographic domains is modeled• Census region • Establishment size • Industry division
• Data collection is halted in a MAS cell when the targeted respondent sample size is projected to be achieved
42
Summary of Establishment Method Sample Selection Process
42
43
Establishment Method Data Collection Protocol
43
44
Other Key Features
• Incentives
– Employer • Toolkit for Business
– POC• Clock, Certificate of Appreciation
– Employee• $10
• Outreach to professional/trade associations increase awareness– Endorsement list provided to POC
45
Supplemental Frame Method
• Multiple strategies to augment the establishment data collection– Supplemental Frame Incumbent
• Job incumbents are directly accessed via an association listing to complete the data collection
– e.g. Industrial Organizational Psychologists – Supplemental Frame Establishment
• Targeted employer sample developed via expert contact/associations where the sampling frame coverage is significantly high but is not adequate by itself
– e.g. Freight and Cargo Inspectors– Special Frame Establishment
• Targeted employer sample completely developed via expert contact/associations where coverage is extremely high
• Normal establishment method is bypassed– e.g. Nuclear Power Reactor Operators; Flight Attendants
46
Occupational Experts (OE) Method
• Used when occupation is difficult to locate in establishments– Small employment size – Job incumbents inaccessible due to work in
remote locations – New and emerging occupations
47
OE Method (cont.)
• Data collected from experts in target occupation– Supervisors, trainers, others with extensive knowledge of
occupation
• Identify appropriate source organizations (e.g. professional associations)– Good coverage of occupation– Can identify members who are occupation experts– Willing to provide lists of experts
47
48
OE Method (cont.)
• Select sample from membership lists
• Contact, screen, and survey OEs directly – no establishment or POC
• OEs complete all three domain questionnaires, background and task questionnaires
• OE incentives – clock, Certificate of Appreciation, $40
48
49
OE Method DataCollection Protocol
49
50
Analyst Ratings Method
• Occupational Analysts Rate the Ability and Skill
Domains
– Updated occupation information collected from job
incumbents used to describe occupation and assist
with the rating process
– Extensive training and quality assurance procedures
51
Analyst Rating Process
Prepare Stimulus Materials
Prepare Stimulus Materials
Select AnalystsSelect
Analysts
Train AnalystsTrain
AnalystsDistribute Stimulus
MaterialsDistribute Stimulus
Materials
Collect RatingsCollect Ratings
Provide Analyst Feedback
Provide Analyst Feedback
Analyze DataAnalyze Data
Create FinalDatabase
Create FinalDatabase
Receive New Incumbent DataReceive New
Incumbent Data
52
Stimulus Material• Occupation title and definition • Job Zone • Important knowledges • Mean importance of core and supplementary tasks• Mean importance of GWAs that:
– Mean > 3.0 for occupation– Require the targeted ability/skill to be performed
• Mean rating of work context statements that:– Mean > 3.0 for occupation
– Require the targeted ability/skill to work in that context
53
Data Collection
• Two groups of eight analysts• Both groups first given same 10 occupations• Rate importance and level of 52 abilities and 35
skills• Ratings compared and discussed if warranted• Batches of five occupations/week; different
occupations to each group of 8
• Evaluate agreement (SEM); facilitate discussion if SEM > .51 for importance
54
Analysts Qualifications
• 16 Trained Analysts• 5 + years work experience
– Currently work for diverse organizations • Marriott, FedEx, SAS, DDI
– Not internship, assistantship or summer job
• Masters or PhD degree in I/O psychology, vocational psychology, human resources (business department) or industrial relations– Graduate level job analysis course (or something comparable)– Graduate level research methods course (or something
comparable)
55
Analyst Training
• 1 ½ days• Hands-on exercises, quizzes, and rating
practice
Module 1: History of O*NET
Module 2: Overview of Stimulus Materials
Module 3: Making Your Ratings
Module 4: Recording Your Ratings
• Refresher training
56
Web-Based Method
• Trained analysts collect and process more specific occupational information from industry, professional, labor, and educational organizations– Scan internet for existing information linked to O*NET-SOC – Collect tasks and detailed information– Compile data, analyze data/expert review– Organize using standardized taxonomies– Generate final output
57
Special Projects
58
Revision of Data Collection Instruments
• Variety of cognitive methods used to evaluate the content and design of the initial O*NET data collection surveys– Expert evaluation (cognitive forms appraisal)– Expanded interviews with individual respondents– Focus group interviews
• Results led to significant enhancements to the instruments while maintaining comparability to the theoretical underpinnings of the variables and taxonomies, as well their psychometric qualities– Simplification of instructions and layout– Reduction in the number of items and scales per item– Wording changes to specific variable definitions
• Current item response rate range 96-99%
http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Data_appnd.html
59
O*NET Integration Projects
• Occupational Code Assignment– Formal request of an assignment of a job/occupation to the O*NET-SOC Taxonomy
• Lay titles– 50,000+ titles– Average of 57 titles linked per occupation
• Crosswalks– Military Occupational Classification (MOC)– Registered Apprenticeship Partners Information Data System (RAPIDS)– Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP)– Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT)– Standard Occupational Classification (SOC)
• O*NET Online Applications– Browse by Career Cluster– Browse by Bright Outlook– Browse by Industry– Browse by Job Family– Browse by Science Technology Engineering & Math (STEM)
• O*NET Occupation Browser– CD-ROM based version of O*NET Online – Designed for organizations serving populations with little to no access to the internet
60
O*NET Career Exploration Tools
Tool Format Purpose
O*NET Interest Profiler (IP) Paper/Pencil Work-related Interests
O*NET Computerized Interest Profiler (CIP)
Standalone or Network
Work-related Interests
O*NET Work Importance Locator (WIL)
Paper/PencilWhat is Important in a Job (Values)
O*NET Work Importance Profiler (WIP)
Standalone or Network
What is Important in a Job (Values)
O*NET Ability Profiler (AP) Paper/PencilWhat Individual Can Do Well (Ability)
http://www.onetcenter.org/tools.html
61
Tools and Technology (T2)
• Machine, Equipment, Tools, and Software workers must be able to use for optimal functioning in a high performance workplace
– This is what employers refer to as “Hard Skills”
– Emphasis placed on cutting edge technologies and emerging workplace practices
http://online.onetcenter.org/link/summary/17-2081.00
62
Tools and Technology (T2)
• 620 occupations populated– All green occupations
• 43,000 objects
• 76 objects per occupation on average– Range = 12-300
63
T2 Development
• Internet based data collection– Build on previous O*NET project tasks (i.e.,
task development)– Trained analysts
• Strong proficiency in Internet searching procedures• Strong background and training in occupational
analysis
64
T2 Development (cont.)
• Data classification– United Nations Standard Products and Services Code
classification system (UNSPSC)
• Quality control • Customer input
– Feedback via O*NET Online & O*NET Resource Center http://www.onetcenter.org/t2/
– Transactional analysis of DOL’s Job Description Writer
65
O*NET New & Emerging (N &E) Project
• 154 New & Emerging Occupations Identified– Significantly different work from existing O*NET-SOCs– Not adequately reflected in current classification– Significant employment– Positive projected growth rate– Education, credentialing, certification programs– Related professional associations
http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/NewEmerging.html
66
O*NET N & E Project (cont.)
– Advanced Manufacturing– Aerospace– Automotive– Biotechnology– Construction– Education– Energy– Financial Services– Geospatial Technology
– Green– Health Care– Homeland Security– Hospitality– Information Technology– Nanotechnology– Retail– Transportation
• Investigated 17 In-Demand Industries
67
O*NET N & E Project (cont.)
• Extensive Web Search Conducted by Trained Occupational Analysts:– Industry Associations and Organizations– Educational Programs– Job posting sites
• Information Gathered, Documented, and Detailed Criteria for Inclusion Applied
68
• Trained occupational analysts conduct extensive web searches to investigate each industry– Background of industry (i.e., when industry started
changing)– Major innovations in industry– Employment trends– New products– Government regulations (e.g., Automotive Emissions
Standards)
O*NET N & E Project (cont.)
69
37 New Health Care O*NET-SOCs• 13-1199.02 Patient Representatives• 19-3039.01 Neuropsychologists and Clinical
Neuropsychologists• 21-1019.01 Genetic Counselors• 29-1069.01 Allergists and Immunologists• 29-1069.02 Dermatologists• 29-1069.03 Hospitalists• 29-1069.04 Naturopathic Physicians • 29-1069.05 Neurologists• 29-1069.06 Nuclear Medicine Physicians• 29-1069.07 Ophthalmologists• 29-1069.08 Pathologists• 29-1069.09 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physicians• 29-1069.10 Preventive Medicine Physicians• 29-1069.11 Radiologists• 29-1069.12 Sports Medicine Physicians• 29-1069.13 Urologists• 29-1129.01 Low Vision Therapists, Orientation and Mobility
Specialists, and Vision Rehabilitation Therapists• 29-1199.01 Acupuncturists• 29-1199.02 Informatics Nurse Specialists• 29-1199.03 Acute Care Nurses• 29-1199.04 Advanced Practice Psychiatric Nurses
• 29-1199.05 Clinical Nurse Specialists• 29-1199.06 Critical Care Nurses• 29-1199.07 Nurse Anesthetists• 29-1199.08 Nurse Practitioners• 29-2099.01 Cytogenetic Technologists• 29-2099.02 Cytotechnologists• 29-2099.03 Electroneurodiagnostic
Technologists• 29-2099.04 Hearing Instrument Specialists• 29-2099.05 Histotechnologists and
Histologic Technicians• 29-2099.06 Ophthalmic Medical
Technologists and Technicians
• 29-2099.07 Orthoptists• 29-2099.08 Nurse Midwives• 29-9099.02 Midwives• 31-9099.01 Anesthesiologist Assistants• 31-9099.02 Endoscopy Technicians• 31-9099.03 Speech-language Pathology
Assistants
70
Greening of the World of Work
• Investigated the implications for the O*NET System- Current O*NET-SOC Taxonomy
- N & E Occupations
• “Green Economy” economic activity related to reducing the use of fossil fuels,
decreasing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, increasing the efficiency of energy usage, recycling materials, and developing and adopting renewable sources of energy.
71
Green Economy Sectors
• Renewable Energy Generation • Transportation• Energy Efficiency• Green Construction• Energy Trading• Energy and Carbon Capture• Research, Design, and Consulting Services• Environment Protection• Agriculture and Forestry • Manufacturing • Recycling and Waste Reduction• Governmental and Regulatory Administration
72
Greening of Occupations
• The extent to which green economy activities and technologies increase the demand for existing occupations, shape the work and worker requirements needed for occupational performance, or generate unique work and worker requirements
73
Greening of Occupations (cont.)
• Green Increased Demand Occupations: – increase in the employment demand for an existing occupation– changes in work context– few if any significant changes in work (tasks) and worker requirements of the
occupation
• Green Enhanced Skills Occupations: – significant changes in work and worker requirements– essential purposes of the occupation remain the same, but tasks, skills,
knowledge, and external elements, such as credentials, have changed– may or may not result in an increase in employment demand for the occupation
• Green New & Emerging Occupations: – impact of green economy activities and technologies creates unique work and
worker requirements, which results in the generation of a new occupation relative to the O*NET taxonomy.
– The new occupation could be new or “born” from an existing occupation
74
O*NET Green Results
• Green Increased Demand Occupations:
– 64 O*NET-SOC occupations• Geological and Petroleum Technicians; Locomotive Engineers;
Architectural Drafters; Chemists; Natural Science Mangers; Agricultural Inspectors
• Green Enhanced Skills Occupations: – 60 O*NET-SOC occupations
• Power Plant Operators; Electrical Engineers; Heating and Air Conditioner Mechanics and Installers; Roofers; Nuclear Engineers; Construction Managers; Farmers and Ranchers; Hazardous Materials Handlers
75
O*NET Green Results (cont.)
• Green New & Emerging Occupations: – 91 N & E Occupations (13 waitlisted)
• Logistic Engineers, Fuel Cell Engineers, Energy Auditors, Precision Agriculture Technicians, Photonics Engineers, Robotics Technicians, Manufacturing Engineering Technologists
• Wind Turbine or Farm Engineers, Wind Turbine Service Technicians, Biofuels Plant Operators, Solar Power Plant Technicians, Solar Sales Representatives/Assessors, Weatherization Technicians/Installers, Carbon Credit Traders
76
Detailed Work Activities (DWAs)
• Detailed job behaviors required across multiple occupations
• More detailed and more specific to a finer set of occupations than Generalized Work Activities (GWAs)
• Linked to and organized by GWAs
• Less specific than unique occupation tasks
• 2000+ statements• 30,000+ linkages
77
Original DWA Development• 2000 to 2002
• Original statements developed to help clients perform skills matching• Oregon State
• Classification of Instructional Programs, OES data, DOT data• Transactional data from employers in Oregon
• Statements linked to O*NET occupations, new statements added to increase coverage, increase consistency, reduce redundancy
• Labor Exchange Skills Project sponsored by DOL• Rational review by occupational analysts
• Further refinement and enhancement of statements• National Center for O*NET Development
• Rational review by occupational analysts
78
Current DWA Project
• Develop new DWAs statements with direct linkages to tasks statements and GWAs
• Occupational analyst rating project• Builds on previous database
• Identify new Green and Healthcare related DWAs
• Populate the 2010 O*NET-SOC taxonomy • O*NET New and Emerging occupations• Other new occupations and changes
79
Spanish Translations of O*NET Questionnaires
• Now available along with the previously available generic, customizable versions in English
• Can be used as a starting point to collect occupational data in support of a wide range of economic/workforce investment activities and human resource management functions
• http://www.onetcenter.org/questionnaires.html
80
O*NET Toolkit for Business
• Information of the features of O*NET and its many uses for human resource professionals and businesses
• On-screen and print version
http://www.onetcenter.org/toolkit.html
81
O*NET Products & Tools
82
• Where Can O*NET Products & Tools be found?– O*NET Resource Center (www.onetcenter.org)
• Databases• Classification & Crosswalks• About O*NET & O*NET Content Model• Career Exploration Tools
– Incorporated within Private, Not-for-Profit, and Government tools and systems
O*NET Products & Tools
• Toolkit for Business• Questionnaires• Research & Technical Reports• Links to Related Sites
83
• O*NET Database (www.onetcenter.org)– Core Database– Supplemental Files (e.g., lay titles, DWAs, crosswalks)– Production versus Development
• O*NET OnLine (www.onetonline.org)– Variety of search options– Detailed occupation information
• My Next Move (www.mynextmove.org)– Easy-to-use search and career overviews– Web-based Interest Profiler
• O*NET Code Connector (www.onetcodeconnector.org) – Occupational coding assistant
O*NET Products & Tools
84
• O*NET Career Exploration Tools– Interest Profiler– Work Importance Profiler/Locator– Ability Profiler
• Training and E-Learning (http://www.onetacademy.com/)– 60,000+ registered participants
• Technical Assistance– Testing & Assessment Guides– Implementation guidance
• Customer Service– [email protected]
O*NET Products & Tools (Cont.)
(www.onetcenter.org)
85
ProductNumber of Downloads
Database 82,968
Career Exploration Tools
Ability Profiler 173,744
Interest Profiler 201,085
Work Importance Locator 96,409
Computerized IP, WIP 142,128
Total Career Exploration Tools 613,366
Other (e.g., Toolkit for Business) 134,434
TOTAL O*NET PRODUCTS 830,768
O*NET Downloads Jan 2002 – Dec 2010
O*NET Widespread Use
86
O*NET Online
average visits per month 1.1 million
linked sites 14,496
O*NET Resource Center
average visits per month 305,000
linked sites 4,223
O*NET Code Connector
average visits per month 63,000
linked sites 1,585
TOTAL VISITS PER MONTH 1.4 million +
TOTAL LINKED SITES 20,304
O*NET Website Statistics - 2010
O*NET Widespread Use (cont.)
87
Students and Youth
Educators
HR Professionals
Employers
Training Specialist
s
Government Officials and Policy Makers
Job Seekers
Career Counselors
Researchers
Who uses O*NET?
MilitaryInternation
al
Community Developme
nt
88Sample of O*NET Users • Manpower• Microsoft• American Foundation for the Blind• Booz, Allan, & Hamilton• IBM• ACT• Torque• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation• The Boys and Girls Club of American• Catholic Community Services• Community Preservation and
Development Corporation• Arizona State University CRESMET
Center• Colorado State University Department
of Psychology• Harvard Business School • Lehigh Carbon Community College• Temple University• Seattle Washington Public School• Army Research Institute• Federal Reserve Bank of New York• U.S. Navy• U.S. Department of Defense
• National Institutes for Health• Alabama Department of Rehabilitation• California Employment Development
Department• Connecticut Department of Labor• U.S. Department of Labor, Employment
and Training Administration• Main Department of Labor• NCESC—Job Connector• State of Montana Human Resources
Division• Texas Labor Market and Career
Information Department• USAID • Cornell University• Canadian International Education
Development Company• E-Career Guidance.Com (Ireland)• NKOKA (South Africa)• Technical Education and Skills
Development Authority (Philippines)• JNET ( Japan)• U21 Global (includes 21 Universities in
11 countries)• UK Commission for Employment and
Skills (United Kingdom)
89
• Human Resources Personnel• Business Forecasters• Industry Analysts• Organizational Consultants• Workforce and Economic Development
Specialists• Curriculum Developers • Researchers
Employers Using O*NET
90
• Career exploration
• Career development
• Job search
• Employment transitions
Individuals Using O*NET
91
Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration
• mySkills myFuture• America’s Career InfoNet and
CareerOneStop E-Tools• Foreign Labor Certification• Apprenticeship
92
One-Stop Partners:
• Career Counselors• Interviewers• Rehabilitation Counselors• Veterans’ Representatives• Training Providers• Business Consultants
93
Questions, Feedback, Additional Input?
www.onetcenter.orgonline.onetcenter.org
orCustomer Service
National Center for O*NET Development:e-mail: [email protected]