Date post: | 28-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jemima-elliott |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
11
Overview of the MINEROverview of the MINERA A ExperimentExperiment
Vittorio Paolone(representing the MINERVittorio Paolone(representing the MINERA Collaboration)A Collaboration)University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh
MotivationMotivation MINERMINERA DetectorA Detector MINERMINERA Physics Overview A Physics Overview MINERMINERA and OscillationsA and Oscillations MINERMINERA Status and ConclusionsA Status and Conclusions
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 22
MotivationMotivationOscillation Measurements:We have entered a period of precisionneutrino oscillation measurements … Need Precision understanding ofLow energy (Few GeV) neutrinoCross sections.
Cross sections interesting in their own right: Determination of Axial Form Factor Duality with Neutrinos Nuclear Effects Coherent Pion Production
See Bob Bradford’s Talk!
From Talk given by Alfons Weber(MINOS)@Neutrino Factory Scoping Study, RAL April 2006
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 33
Motivation Cont…Motivation Cont…Oscillation Measurements:-For NUMI/MINOS, Beamline expected distortion in energy distribution occursFor E < 3 GeV-Recall oscillation probability depends on E … However ExperimentsMeasure Evis
-Evis depends on Flux, , and detector response Interaction multiplicities AND particle type produced
Complications:-Near/Far fluxes are different -> Cross Section does not cancel in the ratio- Low Energy(few GeV) cross sections not well understood - Little data exists: Bubble Chamber -> low statistics and large systematics - Need large A (i.e. Fe) data - Therefore must use untested models to incorporate nuclear effects
“Solution”: MINERA - Put fine grained detector in high rate neutrino beam - NUMI Beamline
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 44
MINERMINERA CollaborationA Collaboration
University of Athens, University of Dortmund, University of Minnesota –Duluth, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Hampton University, Illinois Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research – Moscow, University of California – Irvine, Thomas Jefferson National Laboratory, James Madison University, Northwestern University, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, University of Pittsburgh, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey Tufts University, Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria – Peru, University of Rochester, College of William & Mary, St. Xavier University
(HEP Nuclear Theory)
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 55
MINERMINERA DetectorA Detector
Front View
SideView
(Length is
about 4 m).
Active Target Mass - 8.3 ton total
(MINOS ND)
Inner Detector Hexagon – X, U, V planes for stereo view
Outer Detector
(OD) Layers of iron/scintillator for hadron calorimetry:
6 Towers
Lead Sheets for EM calorimetry
MINERA
Side View
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 66
MINERMINERA Detector Cont.A Detector Cont.
Inner detector is totallyactive scintillator stripdetector. Alternating planes rotated by 60 degrees to make 3 views (XUXV)
Active elements are triangularbars of extruded scintillator withembedded 1.2 mm WLS fibers
Readout by Hamamatsu M64 +
FE Readout Based on existing TriP ASIC and LVDS chain:
ADC (triple range) plus few ns resolution timing
Prototype Board
Detector Channel Count:31,000 channels
•80% in inner hexagon•20% in Outer detector
503 M-64 PMTs (64 channels)128 pieces of scintillator
per Inner Detector plane
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 77
MINERMINERA Performance & CostA Performance & Cost1.7 3.3 cm2 strips : Wave Length Shifting (WLS) fiber readout in center hole For the Inner Detector, scintillator is assembled into 128 strip scintillator planes:
~3 mm in transverse direction from light sharing
Charged particle
Estimated Cost:
<PE>~14
Coordinate residual for
different strip
widths
4cm width
3cm width
Light Output(per layer):
~$15M
It’s a Bargain!
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 88
MINERMINERA Physics Overview:A Physics Overview:Low Energy Neutrino ScatteringLow Energy Neutrino Scattering
We will be making precisionmeasurements of lowenergy neutrino crosssections:
Contributions to total cross section: TOT = QE+RES+DIS
QE: Quasi-elastic ->
RES: Resonance ->
DIS: Deep Inelastic Scattering ->
: Inelastic, Low-multiplicity final states
: Inelastic, High-multiplicity final states
1 10 (GeV)
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 99
Some MINERSome MINERA EventsA Events
p
Quasielastic event
n p
Neutral Current 0
A
Resonance production
p ++ - p +
p
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1010
Present State of Neutrino-Nucleon Cross Present State of Neutrino-Nucleon Cross section Measurementssection Measurements
NuMI fluxrange: 1 to 20 GeV
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1111
MINERMINERA Event Rates:A Event Rates:Assumes 16.0x1020 in LE, ME, and sHE NuMI beam configurations
over 4 years
Fiducial Volume:~3 tons CH, ~0.6 t C, ~0.5t Fe and ~0.5t Pb
Expected CC event samples:8.6 M events in CH1.4 M events in C1.4 M events in Fe 1.4 M events in Pb
Main CC Physics Topics (StatisticsMain CC Physics Topics (Statistics in CH)in CH)
Quasi-elasticQuasi-elastic 0.8 M events 0.8 M events Resonance ProductionResonance Production 1.6 M total1.6 M total Transition: Resonance to DISTransition: Resonance to DIS 2 M events2 M events DIS, Structure Funcs. and high-x PDFsDIS, Structure Funcs. and high-x PDFs 4.1 M DIS events4.1 M DIS events Coherent Pion ProductionCoherent Pion Production 85 K CC / 37 K NC85 K CC / 37 K NC Strange and Charm Particle ProductionStrange and Charm Particle Production > 230 K fully reconstructed> 230 K fully reconstructed
NUMI Beams
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1212
MINERMINERA and OscillationsA and OscillationsExample: Nuclear Effects on MINOSExample: Nuclear Effects on MINOS
Final State Interactions:-Intranuclear rescattering - Energy loss and/or absorption - Change in direction
MINERA will perform measurements with high-A targets and high-statistics
MINOS Iron Calorimeter - Nuclear effects among the largest systematics
Changes measured visible energy Spectrum: Translate to shift in Far/Near‘dip’ location -> m2
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1313
Example: MINERExample: MINERA and OscillationsA and OscillationsInternuclear rescattering effects:Internuclear rescattering effects:
Before MINERA stat ~ syst ( rescattering only)
After MINERA: stat >> syst ( rescattering only)
•Effect of this reduction on this systematic error increases “effective” POT by ~40% • Savings on running the MI ~ $60M!
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1414
MINERMINERA and Oscillations: NOA and Oscillations: NOAAOff axis e appearance experiment: A significant Issue ->Backgrounds to e signal:
Examples: NC: o's in shower -CC: High y + o in shower
Beam e
• Also note near and far detector event samples will be dramatically different due to muon neutrino oscillations. - Therefore uncertainties in background and signal cross sections do not cancel completely between near and far detectors.
• A quantitative NOA study will take sometime to complete. ..(still trying to understand how different the near detector event samples will be from the far detector event samples with the totally active scintillator design)
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1515
MINERMINERA Status and ScheduleA Status and Schedule
FNAL PAC Approval for MINERA: April 15th 2004
Tests of detector elements and readout scheme – No show stoppers
FNAL committed to MINERA:– Construction $$ in Oct. 2007 – Sept. 2008
– But FNAL budget is tight …
– MINERvA has a high profile as only major accelerator experiment
to start at lab before NOA
If all goes well we should start taking data in 2009 ...
5/31/065/31/06 V. Paolone/UPittV. Paolone/UPitt 1616
ConclusionsConclusions
MINERA will precisely study neutrino interactions at 1-20 GeV: - Using a fine-grained, high-resolution, detector - Using the high flux NuMI beam.
MINERA will improve our knowledge of: - Neutrino cross sections at low energy, Low Q2. - A-Dependence in neutrino interactions (three targets C, Fe, Pb)
These data will be interesting in there own right and will be important to minimize systematics errors in oscillation experiments.
Turn on in 2009 ...