Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | samuel-knight |
View: | 238 times |
Download: | 9 times |
1
PETE 411
Well Drilling
Lesson 22
Prediction of Fracture Gradients
2
Prediction of Fracture Gradients
Well Planning Theoretical Fracture Gradient Determination
Hubbert & Willis Matthews & Kelly Ben Eaton Comparison of Results
Experimental Frac. Grad. Determination Leak-off Tests Lost Circulation
3
Read:
Applied Drilling Engineering, Ch. 6
HW #12Casing Designdue Nov. 1, 2002
4
NOTE:
On all HW and Quizzes please put:
* PETE 411/501 (or 411/502)* Name, written legibly* Number of HW or Quiz
(on the outside) Thank you!
5
Well Planning
Safe drilling practices require that the following be considered when planning a well:
Pore pressure determination Fracture gradient determination Casing setting depth selection Casing design Mud Design, H2S considerations
Contingency planning
6
Fig. 7.21
7
8
Formation Pressure and Matrix Stress
Given: Well depth is 14,000 ft. Formation pore pressure expressed in equivalent mud weight is 9.2 lb/gal. Overburden stress is 1.00 psi/ft.
Calculate:
1. Pore pressure, psi/ft , at 14,000 ft
2. Pore pressure, psi, at 14,000 ft
3. Matrix stress, psi/ft
4. Matrix stress, psi
9
Formation Pressure and Matrix Stress
PS
overburden pore matrix stress = pressure + stress (psi) (psi) (psi)
S = P +
10
Formation Pressure and Matrix Stress
Calculations:
1. Pore pressure gradient
= 0.433 psi/ft * 9.2/8.33 = 0.052 * 9.2
= 0.478 psi/ft
2. Pore pressure at 14,000 ft
= 0.478 psi/ft * 14,000 ft
= 6,692 psig
Depth = 14,000 ft.
Pore Pressure = 9.2 lb/gal equivalent
Overburden stress = 1.00 psi/ft.
11
Formation Pressure and Matrix Stress
Calculations:
3. Matrix stress gradient,
psi
psi/ft
/ D = 0.522 psi/ft
PS
DD
P
D
Sor
ft/psi478.0000.1D
P
D
S
D.,e.i
12
Formation Pressure and Matrix Stress
Calculations:
4. Matrix stress (in psi) at 14,000 ft
= 0.522 psi/ft * 14,000 ft
= 7,308 psi
13
Fracture Gradient Determination
In order to avoid lost circulation while drilling it is important to know the variation of fracture gradient with depth.
Leak-off tests represent an experimental approach to fracture gradient determination. Below are listed and discussed four approaches to calculating the fracture gradient.
14
Fracture Gradient Determination
1. Hubbert & Willis:
where F = fracture gradient, psi/ft
= pore pressure gradient, psi/ftD
P
D
P21
3
1Fmin
D
P1
2
1Fmax
15
Fracture Gradient Determination
2. Matthews & Kelly:
where Ki = matrix stress coefficient
= vertical matrix stress, psi
D
P
D
KF i
16
Fracture Gradient Determination
3. Ben Eaton:
where S = overburden stress, psi
= Poisson’s ratio
D
P
1*
D
PSF
17
Example
A Texas Gulf Coast well has a pore pressure gradient of 0.735 psi/ft. Well depth = 11,000 ft.
Calculate the fracture gradient in units of lb/gal using each of the above four methods.
Summarize the results in tabular form, showing answers, in units of lb/gal and also in psi/ft.
18
1. Hubbert & Willis:
The pore pressure gradient,
F1
31 2*0.735 0.823
psi
ftmin
D
2P1
3
1Fmin
P
D0.735
psi
ft
Example - Hubbert and Willis
19
Also,
F0.823 psi / ft
0.052psi / ftlb / gal
min
F 15.83 lb / galmin
Example - Hubbert and Willis
20
Example - Hubbert and Willis
D
P1
2
1Fmax 735.01
2
1
= 0.8675 psi/ft
Fmax = 16.68 lb/gal
21
2. Matthews & Kelly
In this case P and D are known, may be calculated, and is determined graphically.
(i) First, determine the pore pressure gradient.
D
K
D
PF i
iK
Example
)given(ft/psi735.0D
P
22
Example - Matthews and Kelly
(ii) Next, calculate the matrix stress.
ft ,depthD
psi ,pressure poreP
psi ,stress matrix
psi ,overburdenS
S = P +
= S - P = 1.00 * D - 0.735 * D = 0.265 * D = 0.265 * 11,000 = 2,915 psi
23
Example - Matthews and Kelly
(iii) Now determine the depth, , where, under normally pressured conditions, the
rock matrix stress, would be 2,915 psi.
iD
Sn = Pn +n n = “normal”
1.00 * Di = 0.465 * Di + 2,915
Di * (1 - 0.465) = 2,915
ft449,5535.0
915,2Di
24
Example - Matthews and
Kelly
(iv) Find Ki from
the plot on the right, for
For a south Texas Gulf Coast well,
Di = 5,449 ft
Ki = 0.685
25
Example - Matthews and Kelly
(v) Now calculate F:D
P
D
KF i
735.0000,11
915,2*685.0F
ft/psi9165.0
gal/lb63.17052.0
9165.0F
26
27
Example
Ben Eaton:
D
P
1*
D
PSF
??D
S
28
Variable Overburden Stress by Eaton
At 11,000 ft
S/D = 0.96 psi/ft
29
Fig. 5-5
At 11,000 ft
= 0.46
30
Example - Ben Eaton
From above graphs,
at 11,000 ft.:D
P
1D
P
D
SF
46.0;ft/psi96.0D
S
735.046.01
46.0735.096.0F
F = 0.9267 psi/ft = 17.82 lb/gal
31
Summary of Results
Fracture Gradient
psi.ft lb/gal
Hubbert & Willis minimum: 0.823 15.83
Hubbert & Willis maximum: 0.868 16.68
Mathews & Kelly: 0.917 17.63
Ben Eaton: 0.927 17.82
32
Summary of Results
Note that all the methods take into consideration the pore pressure gradient. As the pore pressure increases, so does the fracture gradient.
In the above equations, Hubbert & Willis apparently consider only the variation in pore pressure gradient. Matthews & Kelly also consider the changes in rock matrix stress coefficient, and in the matrix stress ( Ki and i ).
33
Summary of Results
Ben Eaton considers
variation in pore pressure gradient, overburden stress and
Poisson’s ratio,
and is probably the most accurate of the four methods. The last two methods are actually quite similar, and usually yield similar results.
34
Similarities
Ben Eaton:
D
P
1*
D
PSF
Matthews and Kelly:
D
P
D
KF i
35
9 10 11 1214
1618
Pore Pressures
36
Experimental Determination of Fracture Gradient
The leak-off test
Run and cement casing Drill out ~ 10 ft
below the casing seat Close the BOPs Pump slowly and
monitor the pressure
37
38
4580105120120120120120120 40 20
39
40
41
42
Experimental Determination of Fracture Gradient
Example:In a leak-off test below the casing seat at 4,000 ft, leak-off was found to occur when the standpipe pressure was 1,000 psi. MW = 9 lb/gal.
What is the fracture gradient?
43
Example
Leak-off pressure = PS + PHYD
= 1,000 + 0.052 * 9 * 4,000
= 2,872 psi
Fracture gradient = 0.718 psi/ft
EMW = ?
ft
psi
000,4
872,2
D
P OFFLEAK