+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model...

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model...

Date post: 06-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: camron-wilkins
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
3 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Water Power Program Chart Water Power Energy R&D IV. MHK Technology 1.0 MHK Technology Development 1.1 MHK Technology Research, Design, Test & Evaluation MHK Technology Development, Deployment and Validation - Labs Technical Support of Marine & Hydrokinetic Technology SNL FOA Support for MHK Technolog y Research, Design, Test, & Evaluation 1.2 MHK Technology Assessment Technology & Project Database Maintenance MHK Technology and Project Database SNL Technology Classification Database Development & Maintenance to Support MHK Technology Assessmen t - Labs SNL and re vision Subcontract SNL Reference Model Development Turbine or Wave Converter Anchoring and Mooring Power Take- off and Grid Connection Inflow Bathymetry and Sediment Marine Life and Habitat Far Field Effects/Reservoir Economic Analysis Model Integration 1.3 MHK Research, Tools, and Testing Research Tools and Methods- Labs Supporting Research and Testing for MHK SNL (20064) Wave Energy System Design & Modeling Wave Energy Converter Device Modeling Array Performance Modeling & Optimization Wave Environment Hydrology Current/Tidal System Design & Modeling Current & Tidal Single Turbine Performance & Dynamics Modeling Current & Tidal Array Performance & Dynamics Modeling Ocean Current, River, & Tidal Hydrology for Inflow Modeling Current & Tidal Turbine Design System Reliability & Survivability Current and Tidal Device Reliability and Survivability Advanced Materials & Manufacturing Manufacturing Materials & Coatings Instrumentation, Testing and Evaluation Lab Evaluation & Testing in Large Open Channel Flume Test Protocol Development Instrumentatio n System Development Lab Evaluation & Testing Large Scale Test Assessment Engineering Support for Research, Tools, and Testing SNL Engineering Support for Research, Tools, and Testing Cardinal Engineering Support Technical Support Technical Support SNL MHK Tech Dev Technical Support Technical Support 2.0 MHK Market Acceleration 2.1 Environmental Impacts and Siting Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Methods for MHK Energy Tools and Methods to Measure/Predict Environmental Impacts SNL (20074) Effects on the Physical Environment Hydrodynamics Sediment Transport Dynamics Water Quality & Food Web Effects on Aquatic Organisms Acoustics V. Conventional Hydropower 3.0 CH Technology Development & Deployment 3.3 Supporting Research and Testing Supporting Research and Testing for Hydropower Water-Use Optimization SNL Hydropower Optimization Toolbox Optimization Tool set Testing and Demonstratio n Project Integration Seasonal Hydrosystems Analysis Sub- basin Model Framework & Scope Seasonal Forecasting and Optimization Algorithm Develop the Seasonal Hydrosystems Analysis Tool 4.0 CH Market Acceleration 4.3 Economic Analyses & Market Development Hydropower Grid Services Quantifying the Full Value of Hydropower in the Transmission Grid EPRI/SNL Hydropower Market Design Valuation of Grid Services Grid Services and Integration Modeling
16
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Text eere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs [email protected] ; 505-284-2767 November 2, 2011 [Title of larger project, if applicable]
Transcript
Page 1: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Text eere.energy.gov

Water Power Peer Review

Reference Model Development Richard JepsenSandia National [email protected]; 505-284-2767November 2, 2011

[Title of larger project, if applicable]

Page 2: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

2 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Purpose, Objectives, & Integration

Goal: Develop a representative set of Reference Models (RM) for the MHK industry to develop baseline cost of energy (COE) and evaluate key cost component/system reduction pathways.

Motivation: Need for COE targets with regard to technology type. Identify future innovation opportunities to prioritize research and cost reduction pathways– Promote and assist a vibrant and cost effective MHK industry– Develop and disseminate system design tools and/or MHK

models for the development of advanced MHK designs (DOE Goal – 10 platforms)

Page 3: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

3 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Water Power Program Chart

Page 4: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

4 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Purpose, Objectives, & Integration

Reference Models Integrate WP Program

Reference Models

Device Development MHK Industry

Environmental StudiesNMRECs,Nat’l Labs, Research Inst’s, Industry

Technology ResearchNMRECs, Nat’l Labs, Research Inst’s, Industry

Cost AssessmentDOE, Nat’l Labs, Industry

Page 5: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

5 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Project Team and Organization: FY11

Page 6: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

6 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Technical Approach

•These reference models focus on simple, robust designs and tools for each market technology. In this way, reference models and established site parameters or inputs can be used as well understood, conservative benchmarks for laboratory, industry and university users to validate their computational tools. •Furthermore, industry users could utilize the reference model results for benchmarking and comparing the performance, loads and cost of new concepts and components. •Each reference model will be validated with experimental results from subscale and full-scale prototypes. •The outcome will be such that users can compare more exotic and complex designs, model approaches and results with others of known accuracy that have been validated by testing and reviewed by subject matter experts.

Page 7: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

7 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Plan, Schedule, & Budget

Schedule• Initiation date: May, 2010• Planned completion date: September 30, 2013• The following are the major Milestones for this project:

– Final report on first three Reference Models (Tidal Turbine, River Turbine, and Point Absorber WEC). September 30, 2011

– Final report on next three Reference Models (Ocean Current Turbine, Oscillating Water Column WEC, and Surge Type WEC). September 30, 2012

– Final report on final three Reference Models (Model devices TBD). September 30, 2013

Budget: • There are no variances from the planned budget.• 85% of the budget has been invoiced

Budget History*FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share

- - $343k - $1,800k -

*SNL budget only for direct costs and contracts to Re Vision and university partners. Does not include funding (~$700k) to other National Labs

Page 8: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

8 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Accomplishments and Results

• Although just begun in May 2010:– Performance and cost results for 1st three models– Have demonstrated that a techno-enviro-economic model

makes sense and can:• Provide a synergistic purpose• Suggest focal points for cost reduction• Create an ability to compare and contrast radically different devices

– Design methods have been implemented and improved• NREL led workshops on modeling/analysis and test instrumentation

– Generated interest among US developers, both to validate and improve performance and to act as a credential for investors

• DOE-funded development leverages new data from device design and demonstration

– Final reports for 1st three models scheduled for November 2011 (due to DOE on 9/30/11)

Page 9: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

9 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

First Three Reference Models

9

RM#1 Tidal Turbine

RM#2 River Turbine

RM#3 WEC Point Absorber

Page 10: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

10 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Development and Applicationof Analysis Tools

Pres

sure

(Pa)

Vort

icity

iso-

surf

ace

CACTUS (Code for the Analysis of Cross and axial-flow TUrbine Simulation)

STAR CCM+

Page 11: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

11 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Point Absorber Survivability: Tank Test & Analysis

UC Berkeley Wave Tank Test(H=2m to H=20m) CFD simulation – NREL- STAR CCM

• 5th-order Stokes waves • wave height H=4 m; wave period

T=10sec)Wave height H=6 m & wave period T=10sec (full scale)

Page 12: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

12 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Impact on COE

Effects of Device Size

Effects of Power Density

Cost Drivers

Page 13: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

13 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

• Accomplishments– Validation testing for WEC model– Preliminary report on first three models

• Includes performance and COE estimates• Already demonstrating areas for future improvements/investments

• Upcoming Milestones and Products– Final Report for Version 1 of first three models (Sept. 2011)– Initiated designs and concepts for next three models (2 WECs

and 1 Turbine) due at end of FY12– Validation testing for turbine models 1 and 2

Accomplishments and Results

Page 14: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

14 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Challenges to Date

The largest challenge was defining and coordinating a relatively large project amongst several National Labs, universities and industry. This was compounded by having a mid-year start and maintaining an accelerated schedule. There were challenges for all contributors to assign appropriate staffing and other resources to meet the aggressive goals.

The project team worked well to support each other for various project components. Some staffing reorganization was required by National Lab participants and university support was solicited and acquired to meet the projects’ objectives. These challenges were met successfully and the project remained on budget and on schedule.

Page 15: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

15 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Next Steps

• FY12 Plans– Final Report for Version 1 of first three models (Sept. 2011 to DOE,

Nov/Dec Public Release)– Initiated designs and concepts for next three models (2 WECs and 1

Turbine) due at end of FY12– Validation testing for turbine models 1 and 2

The results of this work will impact DOE investment decisions for future research and industry support.

The work could be expanded to allow for future iterations of each reference model as test data becomes available and model refinements improve predictions and uncertainties

Page 16: 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

16 | Wind and Water Power Program eere.energy.gov

Next Three Models


Recommended