+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC...

1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC...

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: jalen-suggett
View: 217 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

1

Responsible Conduct in Human Research(Fall 2009)

Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009

Page 2: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

2

In brief Ethics/Regulations What is research Involvement of the IRB Types of review and the consent process The “Bottom” line

Page 3: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

3

“Doing the right thing”“Real integrity is doing the right thing, knowing that nobody’s

going to know whether you did it or not” - Oprah Winfrey 1

Various codes for the proper and responsible conduct of human research have been incorporated into researchers interact with people and how universities conduct business.

1 http://www.wow4u.com/oprahwinfrey/index.html

Page 4: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

4

To do the right thing, know about the ethics

45CFR46 - Protection of Human Subjects - ensures minimal standards for the ethical treatment of research subjects based on past history

Medical research Social and Behavioral Research

Foundations of ethics in human research

Freedom from harm Privacy Voluntary participation

Protection from risks and safeguard from harm

Page 5: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

5

Understand what research is: Research: Systematic investigation that contributes

to generalizable knowledge In other words, an investigator will be "engaged in research", has

proposed an intention to explore a particular topic, while interacting with a living person and either publish (e.g., in a journal) or present at a conference. 

Human Subjects: Living individuals about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual or identifiable private information

Page 6: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

6

Purpose of human research complianceRequired by the federal government as well as the University

of Maryland Ethical review of research Ensure participants rights are protected and that they are

safeguarded from risk and harm Compliance with federal guidelines and principles

Department of Health and Human Services University of Maryland System U.S. Department of Education

Page 7: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

7

The IRB Members include:

Scientists and non scientists from various disciplines on campus as well as graduate and undergraduate student members

Individuals not affiliated with the Campus who represent the concerns of the Community

Provides assurance to the federal government that UMBC will comply with the rules and regulations

and provides oversight for the university's human research use program

Page 8: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

8

Safeguards from harms Emotional or psychological harm Social harm Physical harm Financial harm Legal harm Moral harm

Page 9: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

9

Protection from risks The greatest risk is often a breach of

confidentiality This risk could lead to:

social stigma, loss of employment legal prosecution embarrassment damaged family relationships emotional risks (relive or reveal violence ), which may lead

to physical danger

Page 10: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

10

Enhancing voluntary participation Involves the consent processIt is a “Process” or a “Conversation” that most of the time uses a

“Document” Research statement Purpose Procedures Confidentiality Risks Benefits Freedom to withdraw statement Contact info for the investigator and the IRB Signature and date line

Page 11: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

11

Types of Approval Exempt

Federal regulations specify that certain types of research pose no or very low risks to participants, a minimal review from the IRB is required.

ExpeditedActivity must not involve no more than minimal risk to subjects. The regulatory

definition of "minimal risk" is the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests and falls within list of expedited procedures

Full BoardFull board review is performed by the whole committee and reviews studies that

are more than minimal risk, involve vulnerable populations, or involve special circumstances. Sensitive topics include: sex, drugs, alcohol use, suicide.

Page 12: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

12

Types of research:

Low or less than minimal risk Educational research - improving educational practice in educational settings (no clinical and counseling research) Educational tests - use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement) where subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to

the subjects. Surveys, questionnaires, interviews, or observation not involving "sensitive" topics, such as criminal or sexual behavior, alcohol or drug use on the part of the

participants unless anonymity is guaranteed and informed consent cannot be reasonably obtained (i.e. anonymous observations). Preexisting data/samples that are publicly available and the data is deidentified and uncoded and stripped of identifiers. If on the IRB’s

list of pre-approved data holders , no need for IRB review

Minimal Risk Survey or interview procedures where responses are recorded in such a manner that subjects can be identified, and if known outside the research, could reasonably

place the subject at risk of criminal or civil liability Research deals with sensitive aspects of the subject's own behavior, such as illegal conduct, drug use, sexual behavior, or use of alcohol, unless data is recorded in

such a fashion that identities are kept secure and protection mechanisms put in place Deception Research which include minors (under the age of 18) as participants

May not require IRB review Activities that are not hypothesis driven Data collected for educational or teaching purposes and is not disseminated outside the institution. Literature review to support research purpose or research question Surveys issued or completed by University personnel for the intent and purposes of improving services and programs of the University

Page 13: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

13

What does an IRB expect of an application? Consideration of how the substantive issues & methods fit

with ethical guidelines & IRB requirements Clarity in statement of problem, Research Questions &

Methods of data collection Consistency in content of all documents Completeness of all materials

C+C+C+C=Successful ProtocolCourtesy of University of Louisville Human Subjects Protection Program Office

Page 14: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

14

What happens after review?Annual Continuation and Approval

Expedited board approved human subject protocols at UMBC are approved for a total of five years. A protocol is initially approved for a period of up to 12 months. Four (4) continuations or renewals may be requested, each for a period of up to 12 additional months.

Protocol Modifications

Any proposed change to an already approved human subject research protocol, measures, or informed consent document during the period of IRB approval must be submitted in writing to the IRB immediately for review and approval

Closing a Protocol

Protocol closure may occur when data collection is completed, when basic data analyses are completed and when all contact with participants has ended.

Reporting Adverse Events

Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others

Protocol Deviations and Violations

Protocol deviations and/or instances of noncompliance with IRB regulations

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Protocol Monitoring (PAPM)

Post approval protocol monitoring (PAPM) to protect research participants, to educate researchers about human subject protection issues and to improve the quality of research by detecting errors and/or omissions that might occur when performing research activities.

Page 15: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

15

What is the bottom line for an investigator? Be trained and fully aware Following IRB conditions and requirements Reporting progress of research Be aware of your own ethics

Page 16: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

16

Expectations from the IRB? When in doubt, ask questions; seek help Remember: consideration, clarity, consistency, completeness Don’t initiate research before obtaining IRB approval. Renew ongoing proposals each year in a timely fashion. Stay within the approved scope of the project. Submit modifications to the IRB and wait for approval before

initiating the change to the research. Report Adverse Events. IRBs are more than enforcers/regulators

Page 17: 1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall 2009) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

17

5523 Research Park Drive

Suite 310

Baltimore, MD 21228

[email protected]

www.umbc.edu/ressearch/HARPO

410-455-3868 (FAX)

Tim Sparklin: 410-455-2737

Mary Lilly: 410-455-3958


Recommended