+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: frank-conley
View: 220 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

1

Semen analyses and Leja®

Comparison of different counting methods

Page 2: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

2

Correct counting of semen

• There is a relationship between number of cells and human fertility.

• There is a relation between preferred method of treatment and number of cells:– Waiting– IUI, IVF, ICSI

• Amount = (better choice of) Quality

Page 3: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

3

Important aspects ofsemen analysis

• Semen is a suspension

• Semen need to be diluted

• Precision:– Reproducibility of obtained results

• Accuracy:– Correctness of results = correlation to golden

standard– Measurements taken by calibrated instrument

Page 4: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

4

Fertility of a semen sample

• Sperm count

• Motility– Hyper activation

• Morphology

• Stability of fertility when diluted and in uterine tube

Page 5: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

5

Counting

• What do we want to know?– Number of normal cells– Number of moving cells– Number of white blood cells

Page 6: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

6

Methods of counting

• Haemocytometer

• FACS

• Coulter Counter

• Corning

• SP 100

• CASA system with Leja® slides

Page 7: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

7

Haemocytometer I

Page 8: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

8

Haemocytometer II

• Golden standard

• Time consuming

• Error-sensitive: precision in making dilutions

• 2 x 200 cells to count

• Statistical error of counting alone ± 25%

• No differentiation between dead/alive; motile/non-motile cells

Page 9: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

9

Haemocytometer III

In conclusion, the haemocytometer is only usable to calibrate other counting systems.

Page 10: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

10

FACS

• Measures the fluorescence of individual cells• Uses an internal standard• Measures 2000 – 5000 cells per measurement• Cells remain alive (X – Y separation)• The fluorochrome needs to be specific and are

limited to 5 different• Staining of nucleus, dead/alive staining, DNA

lesions, proteins, receptors

Page 11: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

11

Coulter Counter I

Page 12: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

12

Coulter Counter II

• Counting large numbers is possible: smaller counting errors

• Differentiation between particle size is possible

• Differentiation between different cell types is not possible

• Suitable for pure suspensions

Page 13: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

13

Corning

• Measuring the optical density

• One is not sure about what exactly is being measured

• Very high error sensitivity

Page 14: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

14

SP 100 (Nucleocounter) I

Page 15: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

15

SP 100 II

• Measures haploid cells (= semen) using quantitative fluorescence microscopy

• Effect of laminar flow (SS-effect) not researched

• Measures many cells, relative low error.

• Special cassettes are needed

Page 16: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

16

Accuracy

• All systems have been calibrated to haemocytometer

• Each manufacturer is obliged to show calibration data

Conclusion 1:

• All systems count cells, but not motility

Page 17: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

17

CASA systems

• Measures concentration

• Measures motility

• Uses disposable counting chambers i.e. Leja® slides

• Fluorescence microscopy:– FACS possibility at a fraction of the costs

Page 18: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

18

Conclusions so far

Instrument FACS Improved Neubauer

Corning Sperm Vision

Ultimate SP 100

CV 2.72 % 7.14 % 10.4 % 8.13 % 5.40 % 3.11 %

95 % confidence

interval

2.45

3.05

6.42

8.03

9.40

11.7

7.32

9.14

4.87

6.06

2.81

3.49

Comparison of FACSCount AF System, Improved Neubauer hemacytometer, Corning 254 photometer, Sperm Vision CASA System, Hamilton Thorne Ultimate

CASA System and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen

 C. Hansen a, *, T. Vermeidenb, J. Vermeiden , C. Simmet, B.C. Day, H. Feitsmab

 a The National Committee for Pig Production, Danish Bacon and Meat Council,

Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark

Page 19: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

19

Leja I

• Leja is the company that develops and produces in favour of assisted reproduction

• Leja’s ideas originate in an academic setting and are translated to products that work in everyday practice

Page 20: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

20

Leja II

• Leja is ISO 9001:2000 certified

• All Leja slides are CE-marked

Page 21: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

21

Leja slides I

• Two sheets of glass cured together at fixed distance– Using non-toxic resin– resin holds spacers of known defined

diameter– Only sharpened glass is completely flat

• Very small variations in chamber heights occur

Page 22: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

22

Leja slides II

• The glass surface is treated:– Cleaning– Coating

• No direct contact between sperm cell and glass• Regular microscopic glass is surface active:

– Sperm cells bind to clean glass– Residues of soap / oil are toxic to sperm– Quality is not consistent

glass directly from regular stock isnot suitable to determine motility!

Page 23: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

23

Leja slides III

Page 24: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

24

Leja quality control

• Semi-automated production leaves room for both human error and permanent quality control:– Printing errors– Chamber height– toxicity

Page 25: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

25

Slide production IProduction facilities in

clean room environment

Screen printing of ink and glue layers

Page 26: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

26

Slide production II

Curing cover slip by

UV induction

Page 27: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

27

Newton bands

Using monochromatic light, Newton bands are

an indication of chamber height

Page 28: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

28

R&D quality controlRandom testing of

chamber heights by special interference

meter (only 3 on earth)

Toxicity testing:<7% less motility after

6 minutes

Page 29: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

29

Quality certificate

Each order of Leja® slides

comes with a quality

certificate(available to download

on www.leja.nl)

Page 30: 1 Semen analyses and Leja ® Comparison of different counting methods.

30

Leja contact details

Leja Products B.V.

www.leja.nl

[email protected]


Recommended