Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | victor-griffith |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2
Sex Offender PSI
Presentence Investigations (PSI) Assist Judge in making sentencing decision State Mandated (but only 15% funded) Enhanced Sex Offender PSI (in jeopardy per State
Aid cuts) One (1) Probation Officer (2008 = 136 enhanced PSI) Detailed interview regarding sexual history Investigate computer use, pornography history etc Home/neighborhood visit (children? items used to attract
children? Day Care or schools in neighborhood? vehicles used by defendant etc)
3
Enhanced PSI (cont.)
• Extended Victim Impact process
More sensitive letter to victim & multiple attempts at victim contact
Where plea bargain, explain probation conditions, restrictions, treatment, GPS etc.
Addendum for Sex Offender Registration Act determination (assist Judge with Risk Assessment)
Check Email, MySpace, Facebook etc. names & info
5
Probation Supervision
Seven (7) Probation Officer Sex Offender Specialists (in jeopardy due to State Aid cuts)
Enhanced Conditions of Probation Specialized treatment (limited to 2 agencies) No contact <17 Disclosure to landlord, employer, school administration, those with whom intimate etc No pornography, no social networking, no internet w/o Probation Officer approval. No cell phone w/camera, no camcorder, no 900 calls No children’s clothing, toys etc; No law enforcement clothing No post office box
• Polygraph examinations
• Regular Police Collaboration
6
Supervision (cont.)
GPS/Sex Offender Pilot (state $ in jeopardy)
Global Position System (GPS) on all sex offenders until stable; all SORA 3
Exclusion zones Real-time monitoring - Probation & 911 Center; ‘Crime
Scene Inquiry’ Probation Officer teams: nights/weekends, immediate
response to alerts, surveillance, home visits, victim safety checks, Order of Protection checks etc
7
Sex Offender Housing – State Mandates
2006: Penal Law 65.10(4a) – Mandated Probation Condition
Where victim is <18, refrain from knowingly entering area 1,000 from school ground etc. (with some exceptions)
9/17/07: Supreme Court ruling permits ‘…innocent transit in a moving vehicle within 1,000 foot public area around school grounds…’
8
Sex Offender Housing – State Mandates (cont.)
2008: Executive Law 243(4) -- Requires State Probation Director to establish rules for local Probation regarding SORA Level 2 or 3 housing (‘instruct local probation’)
Draft Probation Rule 365 -- Where SORA 2 or 3 sentenced to Probation, an investigation shall consider:
Concentration of sex offenders in certain area or municipality The number of sex offenders at a specific property. Proximity of vulnerable populations Accessibility to family, friends, sex offender treatment etc Availability of permanent housing
9
Sex Offender Housing – State Mandates (cont.)
Draft Rule 365 – Local Probation should consider… Victim address, age, relationship Known Orders of Protection Known presence of persons <18 in residence
Local Probation should summarize findings and make recommendation to Court as to appropriateness of residence
Same rules apply when probationers seek change of address
10
State Mandates – Local Challenges
Lawmaker intent genuine & understandable – protect children
But, not developed by practitioners (police, probation, DA, sex offender treatment specialists)
Judges didn’t ask for this additional guidance or task
Not evidence-based, as State agencies now demand of local government when applying for grant funding
SORA imperfect… Complicated & confusing to public Level 1, 2, 3; Sexually Violent Offender; Predicate Sex Offender; Sexual Predator Plea bargains SORA Level 2 & 3 misleading – many lower level sex offenders at higher risk Recent AP article – not a deterrent
11
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
1,091 Registered Day Care Providers in Monroe County (OCFS)
Unknown thousands of unregistered day care providers
22 School Districts in Monroe County 120 individual schools just in the City of
Rochester
12
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
316+ sex offenders on probation in Monroe County
Most sex offenders reside in City of Rochester
Residency restrictions promote relocation to suburban/rural – less concentration of offenders and ‘vulnerable populations’
14
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
Sex Offender residence restriction – unreasonable task for local Probation
Most probationers already residing at, or returning to, their own residence upon sentencing, not looking for housing…decisions relate to removing the probationer from his home
Most victims are family members or associated, but… Other offenders are best monitored if they can remain in their
family Sex Offender treatment programs are near schools & day care
centers Probation offices are near schools & day care centers Court is near schools and day care centers (Day Care inside some
Courthouses)
15
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
Examples of Concentration
(1) Registered centers only
(2) Probationers only, not including parolees or Registered Sex Offenders not under supervision
Zip code area Day Care
Providers
(1)
Sex
Offenders
on Probation (2)
14609 123 27
14621 133 21
16
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
How many sex offenders = ‘too many’? Rare cooperative landlord, resulting in
several sex offenders residing in same building
Vulnerable entity definition -- no common agreement Penal Law 220 (drug free school zones) Original DPCA definition (colleges, nursing
homes, places of worship etc)
17
State Mandates – Local Challenges (cont.)
Local Probation agencies in peril – State Aid reduced from 46.5% to current 15% while state mandates expand
Vacant Probation Officer positions, mandated overtime, high caseloads, Probation Officers perform data entry & prepare court reports
New Law/Rule creates: Need for home visit where none was required before Additional interview items for Investigating Probation Officer Additional report to the Court
18
Case Example
Bi-polar male, convicted in Texas of attack on 14-year old neighbor while residing alone and while ‘off meds’
Transfer to Monroe County to reside with parents in affluent suburb; classified SORA Level 3; stable when in treatment, on meds, with full time job and supervised by Probation and his parents; no problems since his move to Monroe County
Private day care opens in residence just behind probationer’s family home; neighbors demand ouster & contact media
Relocated to a series of motels, moving each time other motel tenants complained or where children moved in…continues to reside alone in motel room; stable, but risk is higher due to lack of permanent housing
19
Monroe County Reentry Task Force
Sex Offenders released from prison – greater challenge
Same 2008 sex offender housing law to State Parole (impact on County Social Services Commissioners also)
Lack of housing prompts extensive use of emergency housing facilities ($42/day public cost)
Risk remains high due to unstable housing & residing in proximity of other sex offenders
20
Solutions?
Stabilize State Aid to Probation – allow local Probation to adhere effectively to state mandates and reduce sex offender caseloads to allow intensive intervention; or, implement a moratorium on all new mandates
Restore GPS/Sex Offender funding for pilot counties (Monroe, Onondaga, Rensselaer, Westchester…)
State Parole, Probation, Reentry take the lead in identifying safe, secure, stable permanent housing for sex offenders.
21
Questions?
Bob Burns, Probation Administrator
Monroe County Office of Probation – Community Corrections
33 N. Fitzhugh St, Suite 2000
Rochester, NY 14614-1233
585 753-3765