+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

Date post: 15-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: samantha-amice-jackson
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006
Transcript
Page 1: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

1

SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES

DON L. ANDERSON

2006

Page 2: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

2

Bottom lines• Geophysical global estimates of mantle

temperature are slightly higher and have a larger range than petrological estimates from mature spreading ridges (away from ‘plume influence’)

• The conduction geotherm may extend deeper than the average depth of MORB extraction (~280 vs ~100 km)

• The deeper geotherm is subadiabatic• Middles of long-lived plates can be 30-50˚C

hotter than at mature ridges; “new” ridges can give hotter MORB

Page 3: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

3

POTENTIAL TEMPERATURES (Tp)

• Global Geophysical Inversion [heatflow, spreading rates]• 1410± 180°C [Kaula, 1983] (entire range)• Ridges

– [melt petrology] 1370±70°C [Asimow, 2006] (2 sigma)– [peridotites] ±100°C [Bonatti et al., 1993]– [subsidence rates] ±100°C [Perrot et al., 1998]

• Kolbeinsey Ridge– 1270-1360°C [Korenaga, Kodaira]

• Lower mantle– 1500-1730°C [Zhao, Anderson, Stacey, Stixrude]

• Compare with McKenzie and Bickle [1988]– Tp= 1280°C ± 20°C for normal mantle (thereby implying plumes

for Tp>1300 °C)

Page 4: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

4

TEMPERATURE BUMP IN UPPER MANTLE

• Internal heating and secular cooling are expected to decrease the radial geothermal gradient away from an adiabat. Modeling shows that the average thermal gradient is expected to be significantly subadiabatic through much of the interior of the mantle

• There may be a maximum in T near 100-200 km below the plate and below the depth of MORB extraction

• The geotherm is unlikely to be a TBL joining with an adiabat at the ‘lithosphere’-asthenosphere boundary (ala McKenzie, who uses the term ‘lithosphere’ for the TBL )

Page 5: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

5

Page 6: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

6

*

*more realistically, 30-50 C

Page 7: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

7

McKenzie and colleagues assume the upper mantle to be homogeneous and isothermal. They adopt a cold subsolidus potential temperature of

1280°C ± 20°C for normal mantle. Sleep adopted T’s of >200 C to represent plumes

Most other ‘hotspots’ and LIPs have no thermal or heat flow anomaly (see www.mantleplumes.org)

Page 8: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

8

Temperature: Iceland

Foulger et al. (2005)

Page 9: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

9

The total range sampled by ‘normal’ ridges inferred from petrology is 1250-1450˚C (Asimow, 2006) or 1475˚C if Iceland is a ridge and is not built on a continental fragment (this includes crustal thicknesses of 3-11 km and includes 'ridge-like' ridges, away from complexities that are likely to confound simple relationships between potential temperature, crustal thickness, and melt composition such as active flow, fertile sources, non-steady flow, focusing, EDGE effects).

Page 10: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

10

These petrological estimates are now consistent with long-standing geophysical estimates. Kaula (1983) estimated the minimal upper mantle temperature variations that are consistent with observed heat flow and plate velocities. At the fully convective level, about 280 km depth, temperature variations are at least ± 180˚C, averaged over 500 km spatial dimensions. Tp under ridges was estimated at 1410˚C. There is some indication that MORB at the onset of spreading are ~50˚ hotter

Page 11: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

11

Melting Temperatures(solidi extrapolated to P=0)

Eclogite 1100˚C (extrapolated from 1 MPa)

Peridotite 1300˚C (…from 1 MPa)

Melting anomalies may be due to fertility streaks

Page 12: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

12

• The potential temperature of the present upper mantle is 1400±200˚C based on bathymetry, subsidence, heat flow, tomography, plate motions, discontinuity depths (Anderson, 2000). Temporal variations of ~200˚C over ~200 Myr are expected. Secular cooling of 100˚C in 1 Ga is plausible.

• Temperatures at onset of spreading may be ~50˚C warmer

• McKenzie and Bickle (1988) assumed the upper mantle to be homogeneous and isothermal. They adopted a cold subsolidus potential temperature of 1280 ± 20˚C for normal mantle and thus require hot plumes elsewhere.

• If normal mantle temperatures are 1400 ± 200°C, or even 1350 ± 150°C, there is no thermal requirement for hot mantle plumes.

• Convection simulations without plumes give the above ranges in temperature

Page 13: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

13

RIDGES

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Eclogite solidus

Peridotite liquidus

Eclogite liquidus

HISTOGRAM FROM ASIMOW (2006)

Page 14: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

14

Eclogite 70% molten beforeperidotite starts to melt

• eclogite 70%molten atperidotite solidus

• eclogite sinkerswarmed byconduction

• rise before T hasrisen to that ofambient mantle

Cold eclogite can be negatively buoyant but it can have low shear wave velocities & low melting point. Fertile eclogite blobs can be brought into shallow mantle by entrainment or displacement or by melting

Page 15: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

15

Dry peridotite can only melt in shallow mantle

Page 16: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

16

COLD ECLOGITE CAN MIMIC HOT UPWELLING

Dense cold eclogite can have low seismic velocities

Iridges

Presnell, Gudfinnsson, Herzberg

Page 17: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

17

Extreme case of subadiabatic gradient

ARCS; the hot mantle wedge paradox

Kelemen et al, 2002

Page 18: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

18

• Figure 1. Predicted geotherms beneath arcs from thermal modeling (small symbols and fine lines), compared to petrological estimates of PT conditions in the uppermost mantle and lowermost crust in arcs (large symbols and thick lines).

• Most petrological estimates are several 100˚ hotter than the highest temperature thermal models at a given depth.

• Wide grey lines illustrate a plausible thermal structure consistent with the petrological estimates.

• Such a thermal structure requires adiabatic mantle convection beneath the arc to a depth of ~ 50 km, instead of minimum depths of ~ 80 km or more in most thermal models.

• Deeper mantle may be hotter than usually modeled.

Page 19: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

19

Mantle Temperature Variations Beneath Back-arc SpreadingCenters Inferred from Seismology, Petrology, and Bathymetry

Douglas A. Wiens*, Katherine Kelley. Terry PlankEarth and Planetary Science Letters

Compare max T with

Hawaii

Page 20: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

20

The currently high flux at Hawaii is unusual

Van Ark & Lin, 2004

The quasi-periodic variations in the flux along the Hawaiian ridge may be due to fertile streaks or stress variations rather than pulsation of a plume. The highest flux is on the young lithosphere between the Murray and Molokai FZ

Page 21: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

21

A fertility streak can be due to subduction of an aseismic ridge or

seamount chain (about 20 are currently entering subduction zones)

Hawaiian swell can be due to a buried buoyant load at 120 km

depth (Van Ark & Lin, 2004).

Page 22: 1 SUMMARY OF MANTLE TEMPERATURES DON L. ANDERSON 2006.

22

In an internally heated mantle or in a mantle that is cooled by cold slabs, the

geotherm becomes subadiabatic.

This means that shallow mantle temperatures can be hotter than at

~600 km.

Actual mantle temperatures and their variations are greater, and the melting

temperatures can be less, than assumed in plume modelling.


Recommended