+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 The State of the U.S. Grid: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Hoecker...

1 The State of the U.S. Grid: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Hoecker...

Date post: 28-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: janel-ilene-wood
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
13
1 The State of the U.S. The State of the U.S. Grid: Recalibrating Risk Grid: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation and Regulation Remarks of James Hoecker Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Hoecker Energy Law & Policy PLLC Hoecker Energy Law & Policy PLLC Former Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Former Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The World Bank Workshop: “Expanding Transmission for Renewable Energy – Smart Planning and Cost RecoveryJune 24, 2010 1
Transcript

1

The State of the U.S. Grid: The State of the U.S. Grid: Recalibrating Risk and Recalibrating Risk and

RegulationRegulation

Remarks of James HoeckerHusch Blackwell Sanders LLPHusch Blackwell Sanders LLP

Hoecker Energy Law & Policy PLLCHoecker Energy Law & Policy PLLCFormer Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFormer Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The World Bank Workshop:“Expanding Transmission for Renewable Energy – Smart

Planning and Cost Recovery”June 24, 2010

1

2

Today’s National GridToday’s National Grid

Key network infrastructure vital to the nation’s economy A nationwide164,000-mile, highly-integrated network of

transmission lines and control facilities, interconnecting over 750,000 MW of generating capacity to millions of customers in all regions, and 3000 utilities

3

““This is your father’s electric This is your father’s electric system–but it can’t stay that way system–but it can’t stay that way for long” for long” (Sue Tierney, 2008)(Sue Tierney, 2008)

The “Grid” Is the Enabler Of New Technologies and System Innovation.

Primary Benefits of transmission: network reliability, lower costs of energy/capacity

Strategic Benefits: renewable resource development and integration, lower GHG emissions, fuel diversity, market power mitigation

Extreme Event Benefits: mitigate impact of multiple contingencies, reduce price volatility from outages

Secondary Benefits: economic development, new investment, tax base

(LBNL, Public Interest Energy Research)

)

4

Aging and deteriorating infrastructure More dispersed resources of generation Wholesale competition among generators Complex bulk power markets Arrival of the digital economy Electricity consumption doubled 1980-2007 Shifts of public policy (e.g., RPS, efficiency, demand

response)

Aging and deteriorating infrastructure More dispersed resources of generation Wholesale competition among generators Complex bulk power markets Arrival of the digital economy Electricity consumption doubled 1980-2007 Shifts of public policy (e.g., RPS, efficiency, demand

response)

Challenges Confronting OurTransmission System

Challenges Confronting OurTransmission System

4

5

Obstacles to Obstacles to Transmission Upgrades/ExpansionTransmission Upgrades/Expansion

Obstacles to Obstacles to Transmission Upgrades/ExpansionTransmission Upgrades/Expansion

“Not in my backyard” or “not in my term of office” Conflicts between local, state and regional interests Inconsistent state and local regulation Uncoordinated environmental reviews Federal land authorization, esp. in the West Lack of timing coordination among siting entities Varying GHG restrictions and RPS’s Difficulty right-sizing for short and long-term needs Uncoordinated siting of lines and generators Timing of “need” determinations Recently, regional resistance to power “imports” and broadened allocations of transmission costs

“Not in my backyard” or “not in my term of office” Conflicts between local, state and regional interests Inconsistent state and local regulation Uncoordinated environmental reviews Federal land authorization, esp. in the West Lack of timing coordination among siting entities Varying GHG restrictions and RPS’s Difficulty right-sizing for short and long-term needs Uncoordinated siting of lines and generators Timing of “need” determinations Recently, regional resistance to power “imports” and broadened allocations of transmission costs 5

Must We Build More Transmission?Must We Build More Transmission?

NERC: Transmission additions will triple to 3100 miles/year 2009-2018. Project proposals abound: 90 planned projects each greater than $100 million (totaling $120 Billion)

Prospects for a clean energy economy—RPS, climate legislation, smart grid; renewable energy projects mean jobs and will drive major transmission expansions and upgrades; 20-30% wind penetration in the East = > $100 Billion for transmission (NREL)

Other drivers: reliability, cyber security, replacing aging facilities, new technologies, load growth

PROBLEM: approval processes are out of sync with the realities of multi-state, multi-system, multi-purpose transmission

NERC: Transmission additions will triple to 3100 miles/year 2009-2018. Project proposals abound: 90 planned projects each greater than $100 million (totaling $120 Billion)

Prospects for a clean energy economy—RPS, climate legislation, smart grid; renewable energy projects mean jobs and will drive major transmission expansions and upgrades; 20-30% wind penetration in the East = > $100 Billion for transmission (NREL)

Other drivers: reliability, cyber security, replacing aging facilities, new technologies, load growth

PROBLEM: approval processes are out of sync with the realities of multi-state, multi-system, multi-purpose transmission

6

7

Siting – Location and Multiple Definitions of “Need” States consider need for facilities when siting them

Cost allocation – Who Pays? Who Benefits? States are influenced by the rate impacts on citizens when considering need; recent FERCs defer to states and stakeholders

Planning – Which Projects Are Needed? Which Are Not? Stakeholders, regional planners, regulators, or

politics can influence whether projects satisfy reliability, economic, environmental, or public policy needs

Siting – Location and Multiple Definitions of “Need” States consider need for facilities when siting them

Cost allocation – Who Pays? Who Benefits? States are influenced by the rate impacts on citizens when considering need; recent FERCs defer to states and stakeholders

Planning – Which Projects Are Needed? Which Are Not? Stakeholders, regional planners, regulators, or

politics can influence whether projects satisfy reliability, economic, environmental, or public policy needs

Q. Who Decides What Best Serves Q. Who Decides What Best Serves The Public Interest? A. EverybodyThe Public Interest? A. Everybody Q. Who Decides What Best Serves Q. Who Decides What Best Serves The Public Interest? A. EverybodyThe Public Interest? A. Everybody

7

8

Major Transmission ProposalsMajor Transmission Proposals

9

Transmission Plans: N. AmericaTransmission Plans: N. AmericaSource: North American Electric Reliability Corporation

10

Smart Grid Technology Beats the “Old Technology” Rap

– Two-way Communication of Data; Control of Supply and Demand

– Automation Enables A Self-Healing Grid

– New Visualization Tools Promote Reliability

– Other Benefits Include Fuel Diversity, Competitive and Liquid Wholesale Markets; Market Power Mitigation; Risk Mitigation and Price Stability

– Smart Tech Not a Panacea for Aging Infrastructure or Access to Renewable Energy

Resolving Economic – Regulatory Conflicts -- Regulation versus Entrepreneurialism -- Public Utility Business Model

Reform of Policy and Procedure -- Opposition to cost socialization -- Opposition to federal oversight of planning -- Resistance to standardization

-- Assurance of cost recovery

Smart Grid Technology Beats the “Old Technology” Rap

– Two-way Communication of Data; Control of Supply and Demand

– Automation Enables A Self-Healing Grid

– New Visualization Tools Promote Reliability

– Other Benefits Include Fuel Diversity, Competitive and Liquid Wholesale Markets; Market Power Mitigation; Risk Mitigation and Price Stability

– Smart Tech Not a Panacea for Aging Infrastructure or Access to Renewable Energy

Resolving Economic – Regulatory Conflicts -- Regulation versus Entrepreneurialism -- Public Utility Business Model

Reform of Policy and Procedure -- Opposition to cost socialization -- Opposition to federal oversight of planning -- Resistance to standardization

-- Assurance of cost recovery

Where Do We Go From Here?Where Do We Go From Here?Where Do We Go From Here?Where Do We Go From Here?

Voices of TransitionVoices of Transition

“The way we look at it, the grid’s been smart for awhile. It takes some pretty sophisticated tools to monitor, dispatch, and control electricity flow.”

-- A Transmission engineerA Transmission engineer

“Do you know what keeps me up at night? Not my programmers. Not my investors. Not my health care costs. It’s state regulators.”

-- -- A smart grid firm CEOA smart grid firm CEO

Source: Fox-Penner, , Smart Power

12

Positive investment trends in all regions: quadruple the 1990s

Interconnection-wide planning efforts (ARRA-funded) More FERC leadership in cost allocation and planning Pending transmission and climate legislation could could

address planning, siting, and cost allocation to varying degrees– – S.1462 American Clean Energy Leadership Act

(E&NR Comm.)– H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy & Security Act

(Waxman-Markey)– American Power Act (Kerry-Lieberman-without

Graham)

Positive investment trends in all regions: quadruple the 1990s

Interconnection-wide planning efforts (ARRA-funded) More FERC leadership in cost allocation and planning Pending transmission and climate legislation could could

address planning, siting, and cost allocation to varying degrees– – S.1462 American Clean Energy Leadership Act

(E&NR Comm.)– H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy & Security Act

(Waxman-Markey)– American Power Act (Kerry-Lieberman-without

Graham)

The Hill, The Spill, and The Hill, The Spill, and the Climate Billthe Climate Bill

The Hill, The Spill, and The Hill, The Spill, and the Climate Billthe Climate Bill

12

13

James J. Hoecker, JD, Ph.DHusch Blackwell Sanders LLP

Hoecker Energy Law & Policy [email protected]

www.helppllc.com202-378-2300

www.wiresgroup.com

13


Recommended