1TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

C. Edward Chow

Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Colorado at Colorado Springs

C. Edward Chow

Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Colorado at Colorado Springs

SCOLD: Secure Collective Internet Defense

http://cs.uccs.edu/~scold/A NISSC Sponsored Project

SCOLD: Secure Collective Internet Defense

http://cs.uccs.edu/~scold/A NISSC Sponsored Project

Part of this work is based on research sponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratory, under agreement number F49620-03-1-0207. It was sponsored by a NISSC Summer 2003

grant.

2TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Outline of the TalkOutline of the Talk

Network Security Research in UCCS Network Lab

Secure Collective Internet Defense, the Basic Idea.

Secure Collective Internet Defense, SCOLDv0.1. A technique based Intrusion Tolerance paradigm

SCOLDv0.1 implementation and testbed

Secure DNS update with indirect routing entries

Indirect routing protocol based on IP tunnel

Performance Evaluation of SCOLDv0.1

Conclusion and Future Directions

Network Security Research in UCCS Network Lab

Secure Collective Internet Defense, the Basic Idea.

Secure Collective Internet Defense, SCOLDv0.1. A technique based Intrusion Tolerance paradigm

SCOLDv0.1 implementation and testbed

Secure DNS update with indirect routing entries

Indirect routing protocol based on IP tunnel

Performance Evaluation of SCOLDv0.1

Conclusion and Future Directions

3TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

New UCCS IA Degree/CertificateNew UCCS IA Degree/Certificate

Master of Engineering Degree in Information Assurance Certificate in Information Assurance (First program

offered to officers of SPACECOM at Peterson AFB through NISSC and UCCS Continue Education, 2002-3) It includes four courses: Computer Networks;

Fundamental of Security; Cryptography; Advanced System Security Design

4TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

UCCS Network/System Research LabUCCS Network/System Research Lab Director: Dr. C. Edward Chow Network System Research Seminar: Every Tuesday EAS177 5-6pm, open to public New CS Faculty: Dr. Xiaobo Zhou (Differential Service; QoS; Degraded DDoS Defense) Graduate students:

John Bicknell/Steve McCaughey/Anders Hansmat: Distributed Network Restoration/Network Survivability (Two US Patents)

Hekki Julkunen: Dynamic Packet Filter Chandra Prakash: High Available Linux kernel-based Content Switch Ganesh Godavari (Ph.D.): Linux based Secure Web Switch; Secure Groupware; First

Responder Wireless Sensor Network Angela Cearns: Autonomous Anti-DDoS (A2D2) Testbed Longhua Li: IXP-based Content Switch Yu Cai (Ph.D.): SCOLD: Indirect Routing, Multipath Routing Jianhua Xie (Ph.D.): Secure Storage Networks Frank Watson: Content Switch for Email Security Paul Fong: Wireless AODV Routing for sensor networks Nirmala Belusu: Wireless Network Security PEAP vs. TTLS apply to ad hoc network access control David Wikinson: SCOLD: Secure DNS Update. Murthy Andukuri/Jing Wu: Enhanced BGP/MPLS-based VPN; Disaster Recovery based on iSCSI.

Research Projects with Local Companies: MCI on Network Restoration/Survivability. Two Patents Awarded. Beta test Northrop Grumman’s MIND enhanced network analysis tool. CASI-Omnipoint on Wireless Antenna Placement Tool.

5TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

UCCS Network Lab SetupUCCS Network Lab Setup

Gigabit fiber connection to UCCS backbone Router/Switch/Firewall/Wireless AP:

8 Routers*, 4 Express 420 switches, 2HP 4000 switches, 8 Linksys/Dlink Switches.

Sonicwall Pro 300 Firewall*, 8VPN gateway*, 8 Intel 7112 SSL accelerators*; 4 7820 XML directors*. Cisco 1200 Aironet Dual Band Access Point and 350 client PC/PCI

cards (both 802.11a and 802.11b cards). Intel IXP12EB network processor evaluation board

Servers: Two Dell PowerEdge Servers*, 4 Cache appliance*. Workstations/PCs:

8 Dell PCs (3Ghz*-500Mhz); 12 HP PCs (500-233Mhz) 2 laptop PCs with Aironet 350 for mobile wireless OS: Linux Redhat 9.0; Window XP/2000

* Equipment donated by Intel

Gigabit fiber connection to UCCS backbone Router/Switch/Firewall/Wireless AP:

8 Routers*, 4 Express 420 switches, 2HP 4000 switches, 8 Linksys/Dlink Switches.

Sonicwall Pro 300 Firewall*, 8VPN gateway*, 8 Intel 7112 SSL accelerators*; 4 7820 XML directors*. Cisco 1200 Aironet Dual Band Access Point and 350 client PC/PCI

cards (both 802.11a and 802.11b cards). Intel IXP12EB network processor evaluation board

Servers: Two Dell PowerEdge Servers*, 4 Cache appliance*. Workstations/PCs:

8 Dell PCs (3Ghz*-500Mhz); 12 HP PCs (500-233Mhz) 2 laptop PCs with Aironet 350 for mobile wireless OS: Linux Redhat 9.0; Window XP/2000

* Equipment donated by Intel

6TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

DDoS: Distributed Denial of Service AttackDDoS: Distributed Denial of Service Attack

DDoS Major Victims:Yahoo/Amazon

2000CERT

5/2001DNS Root Servers

10/2002

DDoS Tools:Stacheldraht

TrinooTribal Flood Network (TFN)

Agent(Attacker)

Agent(Attacker)

Agent(Attacker)

Handler(Middleman)

Agent(Attacker)

Handler(Middleman)

Agent(Attacker)

Agent(Attacker)

Agent(Attacker)

Agent(Attacker)

Client(Attack Commander)

MastermindIntruder

Research by Moore et al of University of California at San Diego, 2001.

12,805 DoS in 3-week periodMost of them are Home, small to medium sized organizations

7TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Where is Cyber-Neighborhood Watch?Where is Cyber-Neighborhood Watch?

When Neighbor Watch started? http://www.usaonwatch.org/history.asp

How Old is this?

8TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Secure Collective Internet DefenseSecure Collective Internet Defense

Internet “attacks” community seems to be better organized. How about Internet Secure Collective Defense?

Report/exchange virus info and distribute anti-virus not bad (need to pay Norton or Network Associate)

Report/exchange spam infonot good (spambayes, spamassasin, email firewall, remove.org)

Report attack (Have you ever done that? to your admin or FBI? 303-629-7171, http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp)not good

IP Traceback difficult to negotiate even the use of one bit in IP header

Push back attackslow call to upstream ISP hard to find Intrusion Detection and Isolation Protocol spec!

Form consortium and help each other during attacksnot exist!

Internet “attacks” community seems to be better organized. How about Internet Secure Collective Defense?

Report/exchange virus info and distribute anti-virus not bad (need to pay Norton or Network Associate)

Report/exchange spam infonot good (spambayes, spamassasin, email firewall, remove.org)

Report attack (Have you ever done that? to your admin or FBI? 303-629-7171, http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp)not good

IP Traceback difficult to negotiate even the use of one bit in IP header

Push back attackslow call to upstream ISP hard to find Intrusion Detection and Isolation Protocol spec!

Form consortium and help each other during attacksnot exist!

9TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Intrusion Related Research AreasIntrusion Related Research Areas

Intrusion PreventionGeneral Security Policy Ingress/Egress Filtering

Intrusion DetectionHoney potHost-based IDS Tripwire; Anomaly DetectionMisuse Detection

Intrusion Response Identification/Traceback/Pushback Intrusion Tolerance

Intrusion PreventionGeneral Security Policy Ingress/Egress Filtering

Intrusion DetectionHoney potHost-based IDS Tripwire; Anomaly DetectionMisuse Detection

Intrusion Response Identification/Traceback/Pushback Intrusion Tolerance

10TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Wouldn’t it be Nice to Have Alternate Routes?Wouldn’t it be Nice to Have Alternate Routes?

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R R

R

R2 R1R3

Alternate Gateways

DNS

DDoS Attack Traffic

Client Traffic

How to reroute clients traffic through R1-R3?

Multi-homing

11TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Secure Collective DefenseSecure Collective Defense Main IdeaExplore secure alternate paths for clients to come in; Utilize

geographically separated proxy servers. Goal:

Provide secure alternate routes Hide IP addresses of alternate gateways

Techniques: Multiple Path (Indirect) Routing Secure DNS extension: how to inform client DNS servers to add alternate

new entries (Not your normal DNS name/IP address mapping entry). Utilize a consortium of Proxy servers with IDS that hides the IP address of

alternate gateways. How to partition clients to come at different proxy servers?

may help identify the attacker! How clients use the new DNS entries and route traffic through proxy server?

Use Sock protocol, modify resolver library

12TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Implement Alternate RoutesImplement Alternate Routes

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R R

R

R2 R1R3

Alternate Gateways

DNS

DDoS Attack Traffic

Client Traffic

Need to Inform Clients or Client DNS servers!

But how to tell which Clients are not compromised?

How to hide IP addresses of

Alternate Gateways?

13TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLDSCOLD

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R R

R

Proxy1

Proxy2Proxy3

R2

R1 R3

block

RerouteCoordinato

rAttack TrafficClient Traffic

1. IDS detects intrusion Blocks Attack Traffic Sends distress call to Reroute Coordinator

block

14TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLDSCOLD

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R R

R

Proxy1

Proxy2Proxy3

R2

R1 R3

block

Attack TrafficClient Traffic

1. IDS detects intrusion Blocks Attack Traffic Sends distress call to Reroute Coordinator

RerouteCoordinato

r

2. Sends Reroute Command with (DNS Name, IP Addr. Of victim,

Proxy Server(s)) to DNS

15TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLDSCOLD

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R

R

Proxy1

Proxy2Proxy3

R2

R1 R3

Attack TrafficClient Traffic

RerouteCoordinato

r

2. Sends Reroute Command with (DNS Name, IP Addr. Of victim,

Proxy Server(s)) to DNS

3. New route via Proxy3 to R3

3. New route via Proxy2 to R2

3. New route via Proxy1 to R1

R

block

16TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLDSCOLD

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R

Proxy1

Proxy2Proxy3

R1

Attack TrafficClient Traffic

RerouteCoordinato

r

3. New route via Proxy3 to R3

3. New route via Proxy2 to R2

3. New route via Proxy1 to R1

R

block4a. Attack traffic detected by IDSblock by Firewall

4. Attack traffic detected by IDSblock by Firewall

R R

R3R2

17TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLDSCOLD

DNS1

...

Victim

AA A A A A A A

net-a.com net-b.com net-c.com

DNS2 DNS3

... ......

R R R

R

1.distress call

Proxy1Proxy2 Proxy3

4a. Attack traffic detected by IDSblock by Firewall

R2

R1 R3

block

3. New route via Proxy2 to R2

RerouteCoordinato

rAttack TrafficClient Traffic

3. New route via Proxy3 to R3

4. Attack traffic detected by IDSblock by Firewall

4b. Client traffic comes in via alternate route 2. Sends Reroute Command with

(DNS Name, IP Addr. Of victim, Proxy Server(s))

3. New route via Proxy1 to R1

18TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLD Secure DNS Updatewith New Indirect DNS EntriesSCOLD Secure DNS Update

with New Indirect DNS Entries

(target.targetnet.com, 133.41.96.71, ALT 203.55.57.102                               203.55.57.103                               185.11.16.49                               221.46.56.38

A set of alternate proxy servers for indirect routes

New Indirect DNS Entries:

Modified

Bind9

Modified

Bind9

Modified

ClientResolveLibrary

Major WorkNew

Protocol

19TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

SCOLD Indirect RoutingSCOLD Indirect Routing

IP tunnelIP tunnel

20TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Performance of SCOLD v0.1Performance of SCOLD v0.1

Table 1: Ping Response Time (on 3 hop route)

Table 2: SCOLD FTP/HTTP download Test (from client to target)

Table 1: Ping Response Time (on 3 hop route)

Table 2: SCOLD FTP/HTTP download Test (from client to target)

No DDoS attack, direct route

DDoS attack, direct route

No DDoS attack, indirect route

with DDoS attack indirect route Doc

Size

FTP HTTP FTP HTTP FTP HTTP FTP HTTP 100k 0.11 s 3.8 s 8.6 s 9.1 s 0.14 s 4.6 s 0.14 s 4.6 s 250k 0.28 s 11.3 s 19.5 s 13.3 s 0.31 s 11.6 s 0.31 s 11.6 s 500k 0.65 s 30.8 s 39 s 59 s 0.66 s 31.1 s 0.67 s 31.1 s 1000k 1.16 s 62.5 s 86 s 106 s 1.15 s 59 s 1.15 s 59 s 2000k 2.34 s 121 s 167 s 232 s 2.34 s 122 s 2.34 s 123 s

No DDoS attack direct route

DDoS attackdirect route

No DDoS attack indirect route

DDoS attack indirect route

0.49 ms 225 ms 0.65 ms 0.65 ms

21TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

A2D2 Multi-Level Adaptive Rate Limiting For

Anti-DDos Defense

A2D2 Multi-Level Adaptive Rate Limiting For

Anti-DDos Defense

IP: 128.198.61.12NM: 255.255.255.128

GW: 128.198.61.1

eth0

Firewall Gateway

Multi-LevelRate Limiting

as Linux Router

IP: 192.168.0.1NM: 255.255.0.0

GW: 128.198.61.12

eth1

IDS

snort.confFloodPreprocessor

Threshold

snort.confFloodRateLimiter

PreprocessorThresholds

rateif.conflevels, rate,expiration,port # etc.

./snort -A UNSOCK

report.c./alert

rateif.pl

Level 4

Open(5 days)

Level 3

100 p/s

Level 2

50 p/s

Level 1

Block(2 hrs)

Level 0

Block(2 days)

Level 1Expires

22TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

Future DirectionsFuture Directions Modify TCP to utilize the multiple geographically diverse routes set up with IP

tunnels. Recruit sites for wide area network SCOLD experiments. Northrop Grumman, Air

Force Academy's IA Lab, and University of Texas are initial potential partners. Email me if you would like to be part of the SCOLD beta test sites and members of the SCOLD consortium.

We are currently working with Northrop Grumman researchers to beta test their new MIND network analysis tool.

The network status information collected and analyzed by the MIND can be used for selecting proxy server sites.

Pick and choose a geographically diverse set of proxy servers for indirect routing is a challenging research problem.

SCOLD technologies can be used as a potential solution for bottlenecks detected by MIND.

SCOLD can be used to provide additional Internet bandwidth dynamically when there is sudden bandwidth and connection need. Not just a security tool.

A company can deploy SCOLD by using its branch offices to provide proxy servers.

Modify TCP to utilize the multiple geographically diverse routes set up with IP tunnels.

Recruit sites for wide area network SCOLD experiments. Northrop Grumman, Air Force Academy's IA Lab, and University of Texas are initial potential partners. Email me if you would like to be part of the SCOLD beta test sites and members of the SCOLD consortium.

We are currently working with Northrop Grumman researchers to beta test their new MIND network analysis tool.

The network status information collected and analyzed by the MIND can be used for selecting proxy server sites.

Pick and choose a geographically diverse set of proxy servers for indirect routing is a challenging research problem.

SCOLD technologies can be used as a potential solution for bottlenecks detected by MIND.

SCOLD can be used to provide additional Internet bandwidth dynamically when there is sudden bandwidth and connection need. Not just a security tool.

A company can deploy SCOLD by using its branch offices to provide proxy servers.

23TPAC 10/10/2003 chow

ConclusionConclusion

Secure Collective Internet Defense needs significant helps from community. Tremendous research and development opportunities.

SCOLD v.01 demonstrated DDoS defense via use of secure DNS updates with new indirect routing IP-tunnel based indirect routing to let legitimate clients come in

through a set of proxy servers and alternate gateways. Can be used to provide additional Internet bandwidth (nice side

effect!) Multiple indirect routes can also be used for improving the

performance of Internet connections by using the proxy servers of an organization as connection relay servers.

If you would like to fund this project or commercialize it, let me know.

Secure Collective Internet Defense needs significant helps from community. Tremendous research and development opportunities.

SCOLD v.01 demonstrated DDoS defense via use of secure DNS updates with new indirect routing IP-tunnel based indirect routing to let legitimate clients come in

through a set of proxy servers and alternate gateways. Can be used to provide additional Internet bandwidth (nice side

effect!) Multiple indirect routes can also be used for improving the

performance of Internet connections by using the proxy servers of an organization as connection relay servers.

If you would like to fund this project or commercialize it, let me know.