+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing...

1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing...

Date post: 06-Apr-2016
Category:
Upload: guenther-knopp
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
27
1 What kind of English What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics? 3. one answer to the topic: historical linguistics
Transcript
Page 1: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

11

What kind of English linguistics do we What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available)need? (of the ca. 65 fields available)

0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda1. why linguistics?2. why English linguistics?3. one answer to the topic:

historical linguistics

Page 2: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

2

swagman = AusE old-fash. 'man with clothes and possession carried around'; swag slang 'stolen goods'billabong ('temporary lake') climatecoolibah tree = 'eucalyptus' aborig.billy = 'William', met. 'friend, pot for food'jumbuck = Native Austr. jiimba, > jump-buck (folk-etym.), cf G. Bocktucker = Austr. slang 'food' (cf to tuck)

Slim Dusty+ 2003

Starter: example Waltzing Mathilda (1820s), now "national anthem"

songs preserve history/culture

Page 3: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

3

tucker in close-up: OED2

to tuck 'ausstaffieren' < ONFr or It. toccare? (Venice!)

Page 4: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

4

1. Why linguistics?

Language, the object of linguistics, is the major tool of human communication and of social life. as against animals language = very universal and multi-purpose tool for

making statements giving commands performing a speech act ("I herewith declare ...") praising sb. arguing with sb. communicating complex thoughts ...

Page 5: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

5

2. Why English linguistics? E = world language

104 countries (McArthur) general lingua franca

diplomacy aviation and navigation tourism international scholarship WWW: "Universität" 28 mill vs "university" 649 mill Sowi now offers its lectures in English.

EFL is a foreign language of a diff. calibre than Fr or It

Page 6: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

6

(1) geographical distribution of English: McArthur's circle of world Englishes, from Crystal 1995: 111

e.g. Chinese, Pakistani,Tok Pisin

Page 7: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

7

(2) GB was important, the US still are

E as a lingua franca

Page 8: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

8

(3) GB has one of the richest cultures of Europe

literature: from Beowulf to The Beatleshigh culture, pop culture, medial culture

(<US)role of history, e.g. Alfred the Great

cultural history: e.g. Christianity economic history: e.g. the railway

Page 9: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

9

3. Why historical linguistics?

Orwell's warning: Newspeak (cf Essay in 1984, publ. in 1949) many features

reduction of vocabulary simplified WF (clippings: Agitprop, Gestapo; cf modern

acronyms [NATO, Excel] and initialisms [BBC, Stuko] simplified grammar (thinked instead of thought etc)

main point: Newspeak cuts off language from its history quote: "When Oldspeak had been once and for all superseded,

the last link with the past would have been severed." implications of loss of history: no subtety of meaning, no

unorthodox opinions; associations clinging to traditional words are cut out

a-historical language now: "Kollektivvertrag", "senior lecturer", "lector"

Page 10: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

10

"In need of history": special reasons in English Studies English provides a particular wealth of

language history cf David Crystal 2004, The Stories of English

enormous range of material gathered to demonstrate the diversity of English through the ages (one of the reviewers)

600 pages on selected language-historical aspects from OE to Tolkien's Hobbits (Crystal = synchronic linguist)

Research deficits in view ofBritish dialects, spoken English and international Englishes!

Page 11: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

11

Selection of three features

(a) vocabulary: particularly rich and diversified (b) sounds and spellings: particularly

traditional (unlike in German) (c) communicative and cultural aspects:

exceptionally interesting

Page 12: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

12

(a) Lexis: Quantification of various English vocabularies (from Voigt, Langenscheidt/Longman, 1982)

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

GenEng Shakesp Native Non-nat.

# w ords

Page 13: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

13

English lexis: towards a survey lexicology: 1. word field

2. semantics: metaph.

3. etymology

4. pragmatics: please,terms of address

1. OE: heroic words, later relig. words (God, love, filth; later: sentimental)2. kenningar: the bent-necked wood, sea-farer for 'ship';

whale-road for 'sea'3. Roman, Celtic, Germanic; ON, Ofr, Latin in differ. times (Human.: debt, doubt)4. Cultural background needed: please < Fr; change from four forms of address

to one (you/yee/thou/thee > you)

Page 14: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

14

morphol. and syntax: thou, thee, you and ye in England

thou = sg. nom. (G. du)thee = sg. acc. (cf Shp.)you = pl. acc.ye(e) = pl. nom.

Pl. acc. dominates over the other forms.

Page 15: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

15

Semantics: Explain word pairs

forgive/pardon shirt/skirt cow/beef dish/disk chief/chef PN Laing/Laird – long, lord

Page 16: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

16

Etymology creates transparency: cognate English borrowings from Fr. and Lat. (Bodmer n.d., pp. 282)

Latin Engl. Words < Frz. Engl. Words directly < Lat.

conceptum conceit (Einbildung) concept (Begriff) constrictionem constraint (Zwang) constriction

(Zusammenziehung)

collocare couch (sich legen) collocate (ordnen) computare count (zählen) compute

(berechnen) quietus coy (spröde) quiet (ruhig) dignitatem dainty (Leckerei) dignity (Würde) defectum defeat (Niederlage) defect (Mangel) aestimare esteem (achten) estimate (schätzen) factionem fashion (Mode) faction (Partei) facto feat (Kunststück) fact (Tatsache) fragilis frail (schwach) fragile (zerbrechlich) legalis loyal (loyal) legal (gesetzlich)

Page 17: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

17

2nd example: sounds and spellings

Extreme deviation of present pronunciation and spellings – why:– English is more hybrid, i.e. it has been more

under the influence of other languages than, e.g., German; different sets of rules

Scandin.: to get, sky French: employee, garage

– In spelling, E. has been decidedly traditional since the late MAs (Caxton).

Page 18: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

18

some details

examples:– <-gh>: orig. (ME) a fricative [X], cf Scottish night, bright– -our, -or: orig. (ME) < Ofr (= ModFr –eur), weakened

pronunciation in E today: honour, liquor– photo, phenomenon: = Greek, in frequent words

<f> vowels changed most in the history of E, part. due to

GVSh (15-17th c.), therefore their spelling is partic. misleading (rough, ought)

the present spelling is a mixture of diff. historical processes (English = hybrid)

Page 19: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

19

Rhotic pronunciation in England c. 1950 (from dtv-Atlas Englische Sprache 2002)

r lost

r kept

Page 20: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

20

Menorha model applicable to histor. English phonol.: correlation between historical stages and present varieties)

Germanic heritage

OE

ME

Scandinavian

French

18th c.19th c.

AE Austr NorthLd.dial.common

words ESProots

varieties

Page 21: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

21

3rd example: Cultural studies1. What is the Doomsday Book?

Bayeux tapestry

Harold is killed.

Page 22: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

22

1066 and all that

1086William the C.Relevance of the Doomsday Book

"Grundbuch" (index of land ownership)

What happened in Britain in 1986?

Page 23: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

23

1986

Page 24: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

24

A stamp of 1986? ? ??

Page 25: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

25

Summing up: Historically conditioned complexity: Taking-leave formulas

• Goodbye! – < God be with you/ye! (historical) phraseology; word field: religious

• Good day!– arch./Austr. register/varieties

• Bye-bye!– iterative formation baby language/infantilisms in dialect/Tok Pisin etc

• Bye for now! Ciao!– inform./fashion register/etymology

• See you (later/next week/term).– idiomatic expressions: semantic/phonological implications

• I hope to see you again!• Farewell! • Have a nice day/weekend!• Cheerio! (Br inf)• So long! (Br inf)• Hasta la vista, Baby! (US A. Schwarzenegger)• Piss off! F* off!

– slang sociolinguistics, pragmatics• I must be off!/ I must be going! / I've got to go. --> grammar

prep. adj.

conclusion: E allows many varieties/

is difficult

OED2: 1588 Shakes. L.L.L. iii. i. 151, I thanke your worship,

God be wy you. 1591 — 1 Hen. VI, iii. ii. 73

God b’uy my Lord.

Page 26: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

2626

FazitFazit• Viele heutige Wissensinhalte sind geprägt von Schnelllebigkeit und

immanenten wirtschaftlichen Interessen: Passwörter, Benutzer-Namen, Call-Center, Hotlines, Zinssätze, Aktienkurse, Akronyme

• Umso mehr brauchen wir heute auch die klassischen, d.h. langlebigen und bewährten Bildungsinhalte:– Die Geschichtlichkeit der Sprache/des Englischen korrreliert mit unserer

eigenen Geschichtlichkeit und der unserer Kultur. – Die strukturelle und quantitative Komplexität des Englischen heute, als

Folge seiner komplexen Geschichte, bietet eine Vielzahl langlebiger und wichtiger Wissensinhalte.

– Ahistorizität = menschliche Entwurzelung– Der Strukturalismus des 20 Jhds. (de Saussure etc) und die derzeit

modische Beschränkung auf Anwendungsmodelle (Applied Linguistics) werden der Tatsache, dass wir sprachlich und kulturell historisch verwurzelt sind, nicht gerecht.

• Und wenn Sie mich persönlich fragen, ...

Page 27: 1 What kind of English linguistics do we need? (of the ca. 65 fields available) 0. Starter: Waltzing Mathilda 1. why linguistics? 2. why English linguistics?

27

• We can learn for our future by knowing our personal past.

30 years ago

Thank you for your attention!

1 year ago


Recommended