+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 10.PM Risk Analysis

10.PM Risk Analysis

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: shikhajain12345
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 40

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    1/40

    Project Risk

    Possibility or probability that the project willnot turn out as planned or desired

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    2/40

    Project RiskRisk includes potential benefits(opportunities) as well as hazardsOur focus: risk of serious problems or failure,i.e.,

    Project not meeting performancerequirements, schedule, or budget

    Failure

    Not meeting time, cost, or performancetargets by a predefined margin

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    3/40

    Project Risk

    Risk of involves two concepts: The likelihood that some event will occur. The impact of the event if it does occur.

    It is a joint function of the two

    Risk = f (likelihood, impact)

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    4/40

    Project Risk Management Process

    1. Identify risks2. Assess the risks3. Develop appropriate responses to risks4. Track and control the risks

    The risk management process repeats

    throughout every phase of the project fromConception through Close-out

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    5/40

    Risk Management Elements and Process

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    6/40

    1. Identify Risks: Sources of Risk

    Needs and Definition RiskFailure to correctly identify and define current orchanging customer needs and requirements

    Environment

    Project External

    Internal

    Internal

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    7/40

    1. Identify Risks: Sources of Risk

    Technical Risk

    Failure of the end item. Risk due to nature ofthe end item or the process to create it:High complexityLow maturityLow reliability, produciblity, or testabilityHigh concurrency (overlap of project work)

    Environment

    Project Internal

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    8/40

    1. Identify Risks: Sources of Risk

    Risks in the project environmentMarket conditionsGovernment mandatePhysical environment (weather, geography, etc.)Labor and other resource availabilityProject prioritiesCustomer/supplier relationshipsExchange rates

    Environment

    Project

    External

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    9/40

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    10/40

    Element Ref. Risk

    Likelihood(H, M or L)

    Impact(H, Mor L)

    ProjectManagement

    /authority 1 Project Manager's lack of Project Management experience

    2 Difficulty in securing full funding.(e.g. if the funding is coming from more than one source there may be a greater riskin securing it at the same time)

    3 Lack of understanding of project management standards by everyone in theproject team.

    ProjectNature

    6 Innovation or the introduction of new features.

    7 The project is likely to need a large number of workdays.(e.g. low number of workdays = low risk, anything over six months =high risk)

    8 Non-negotiable completion date.

    ProjectStaff

    11 The project team is inexperienced or lacking appropriate skills for the project.

    12 The project team will be expected to support end-users after projectcompletion.

    ( ongoing support = low risk, no support project beyond closure = high risk) The

    Customer 16 Customer support expected to be part of the project.

    17 The project will affect current operations.

    18The customer requirements will not be well documented. (e.g. poor documentation increases risk of delivered product being unsatisfactory)

    Third Parties /External bodies

    22 Third party suppliers are not well known to UEA.

    Risk Checklist

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    11/40

    1. Identify Risks

    AnalogyExperience and documentation

    ChecklistsExperience and post-mortem reviews

    WBS and work packages Example, next slide

    Process flow charts

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    12/40

    WBS and work packages with assessed level of risk

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    13/40

    1. Identify Risks

    AnalogyExperience and documentation

    Checklists

    Experience and post-mortem reviews

    WBS and work packages

    Process flow chartsExample, next slide

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    14/40

    SCALED,SORT BYPOSTAGE

    METERED,PUT INTOFOREIGN AIRMAIL BAG

    MACHINESTAMPSPOSTAGE

    BUNDLESORT TO SIZE QC FORSEAL,

    ADDRESSPOSTAGE

    PUTINTOBAGS

    CHECKWEIGHT

    BLDG. 130

    MACHINESTAMPSPOSTAGE

    BUNDLESORT TO SIZE QC FORSEAL,

    ADDRESSPOSTAGE

    PUTINTOTRAYSBLDG. 200

    BLDG. 231

    SEALEDBY HAND

    PUTINTOTRAYS

    METERED, QCCHECK

    SORT INTOPOSTOFFICEBAGS

    SORT

    WEIGHEDSORTED INTO1,2,4, 8 OZ.GROUPS BYMACHINE

    SORTINTO 1 ST CLASS &

    AIR MAIL

    METERED,QC CHECKPUT INTOBAGS

    AFTER

    6:30 PM ?

    OHARE

    U.S. POST

    OFFICE

    IBD ALL FOREIGN

    BROWN

    HEAVY

    ALL REMITTANCEMAIL AFTER 6:30 PM

    BROWNHEAVY

    WHITE

    AIR MAIL 1OZ ORLESS

    1 OZ ORLESS

    ALL OVER 1OZ

    QC- QUALITY CONTROL

    > LB

    LB

    A I R M A I L

    AIRMAIL

    AIR MAIL

    F I R S T

    C L A S S

    YES

    NOUS MESSENGER PICK

    UP

    OUTGOING LETTERS PROCESSING

    ALSO SPECIALGROUP MAIlNG5-6000 PIECESWHITE

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    15/40

    1. Identify risks

    BrainstormingDelphi TechniqueCause-Effect analysis

    Causes EffectRisk sources Outcomes,and hazards Consequences

    Example, next slide

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    16/40

    Cause and Effect DiagramHARDWARE

    PEOPLE

    FUNCTIONS MONEY

    PRODUCTDELIVERED

    LATE

    Bought-in items may bedelivered late

    Welding may bedefective

    Material may be off-spec

    Manufacture may notcorrespond with design

    Key staff may be out ofaction

    Staff productivity maybe lower than planned

    External agencies maydelay

    Procurement procedures maybe ineffective

    Design may have to be re-engineered

    Design specs may bechanged

    Import taxes maybe raised

    Fabricator may gobankrupt

    Cash flow may not besufficient to pay bills

    Design may not meetstandards

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    17/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Assess RC (the risk consequence orexposure)

    RC = (Probability) x (Impact)

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    18/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Probability, expressed asnumerical estimate, 0-1.0or nominal rating, e.g, VH, H, M, L,VLor interval rating, e.g., 1-5

    Impact, expressed asphysical impact on time (weeks), cost ($) or,performanceor nominal rating, e.g. VH, H, M, L, VL,or interval rating, e.g., 1-5

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    19/40

    2. Assess the RiskCombing several independent risk sources

    omposite likelihood factor CLF = (W1) M H + (W2) C H + (W3) M S + (W4) C S + (W5)D

    where

    MH , M S , C H , C S , and D are failure likelihoods due toimmaturity of hardware and software, complexity inhardware and software,and dependency on externalfactors, respectively; each has value 0 to 1.0W1, W2, W3, W4, and W5 each has value 0 through 1.0and together total 1.0.

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    20/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Combing several independent risk sources

    omposite impact factor ,

    CIF = (W1)TI + (W2)CI + (W3)SI whereTI, CI, and SI are impacts due to failure in technicalperformance, cost, and schedule, respectively; each has

    value 0 to 1.0W1, W2, and W3 each has value 0 through 1.0 andtogether total 1.0.

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    21/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Risk Consequence

    RC = probability x impact

    Example

    RC = 0.75 x 5 = 3.75

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    22/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Risk Consequence

    When probability and impact are expressedas nominal values (e.g., VH, H, M, L,VL; nextthree slides),

    RC = f(probability,impact)

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    23/40

    Element Ref. Risk

    Likelihood(H, M or L)

    Impact(H, M or

    L)

    ProjectManagement

    /authority 1 Project Manager's lack of Project Management experience

    2

    Difficulty in securing full funding.

    (e.g. if the funding is coming from more than one source there may be a greater risk insecuring it at the same time)

    3 Lack of understanding of project management standards by everyone in theproject team.

    ProjectNature

    6 Innovation or the introduction of new features.

    7 The project is likely to need a large number of workdays.(e.g. low number of workdays = low risk, anything over six months =high risk)

    8 Non-negotiable completion date.

    ProjectStaff

    11 The project team is inexperienced or lacking appropriate skills for the project.

    12 The project team will be expected to support end-users after project completion.( ongoing support = low risk, no support project beyond closure = high risk)

    TheCustomer

    16 Customer support expected to be part of the project.

    17 The project will affect current operations.

    18 The customer requirements will not be well documented. (e.g. poor documentation increases the risk of the delivered product beingunsatisfactory)

    Third Parties /External bodies

    22 Third party suppliers are not well known to UEA.

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    24/40

    2. Assess the Risk

    Example

    RC = L x H = M (according to table)

    VL L M H VHVH M M H H HH L M M H HM L L M M HL L L L M M

    VL L L L L M

    Impact

    P r o

    b a

    b i l i t y

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    25/40

    2. Assess the Risk

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    26/40

    3. Decide Risk Response Strategies(Ways of Handling Risks)Transfer risk

    InsuranceProperty damage or personal injury suffered as aconsequence of the projectDamage to materials while in transit or in storageBreakdown or damage of equipment

    Theft of equipment and materialsSickness or injury of workers, managers, and staffForward cover: insure against exchange ratefluctuations.

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    27/40

    3. Decide Risk Response Strategies(Ways of Handling Risks)

    Transfer risk (contd) Contracts

    Fixed-price versus cost-plusFixed price contractor assumes all riskFixed price with incentive-contractor 60%

    Cost plus incentive fee- contractor 40%Cost plus fixed fee- customer assumes all risk

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    28/40

    3. Decide Risk Response Strategies(Ways of Handling Risks)

    Avoid risk Eliminate sources of risk Micromanage

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    29/40

    3. Decide Risk Response Strategies(Ways of Handling Risks)Reduce risk

    Employ best workers

    Use known and tested technology and toolsUse parallel efforts

    Employ strong worker incentives

    Increase frequency and severity of reviews and tests

    Reduce system complexity

    Use design margins

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    30/40

    3. Decide Risk Response Strategies(contd)

    Contingency Plan

    Study possible what-if scenarios anddevelop a plan for each

    Accept risk (do nothing)

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    31/40

    4. Risk Tracking and Response Create a r i sk log or r i sk regis ter ; risks arerank ordered, greatest risk consequence first.

    Risk log and mitigation planExample, next slide

    Cont inuo us ly mo n i to r project for triggersymptoms of previously identified risks, and

    for symptoms of risks newly emerging andnot previously identified.

    Probability: 0 100% Impact: 1 5: Exposure: (Probability) X (Impact) Scale 0 500

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    32/40

    Probability: 0-100%, Impact: 1-5: Exposure: (Probability) X (Impact), Scale 0-500

    Risk: Condition likelyto occur; inherent inevery project

    Functionalareaimpacted

    Effect:Consequences ifrisk occurs

    Preventiveaction to reducerisk

    11 Progeni solutions cant perform upto expectations.

    ApplicationDevelopment

    5 75% 375 Schedule delays. Cost ofhiring a replacement vendor.

    Analyze pilot results andcreate documents that willstandardize the process.

    8 Unknowns in migration project willoccurs.

    TechnicalInfrastructure

    4 90% 360 Scheduling delays andpossible re-engineering.Redundant system costs.

    Build plan and trackingmechanism to manageschedule and resources

    28 Client impact during migrationphase.

    TechnicalInfrastructure

    5 70% 350 Dissatisfaction of client basewith service levels.

    Solid test process duringSystem and Client Beta

    test. Focus from BusinessDevelopment staff.

    22 Programs/WFL run ineffectively in amuti-Usercode environment on asingle system.

    ApplicationDevelopment

    4 75% 300 Increased S&P support andservice level issues.

    WFL training and testing.Technical support fromS&P.

    5 Lift & Merge process wont meetmigration schedule, that calls for themoving of remaining clients, during themigration of the first V/Series site

    ApplicationDevelopment

    4 75% 300 Difficulty in establishingremaining first site clients.Would force a change inmigration strategy.

    Utilize knowledge learnedfrom Purple system Lift &Merge even scheduled forMay of 2000.

    27 Excessive manual changes during post-syntran process.

    ApplicationDevelopment

    4 70% 280 Schedule delays. After receipt of pilotdetermine extent ofexcess work and readjustresources.

    10 Lift & Merge not kept up to date. ApplicationDevelopment

    4 70% 280 Difficulty in establishingremaining clients, on first sitechosen, on the ClearPath.

    Create Plan to keep L&Mon track and current.

    1 Conversion process of Jobflows toWFL and applicational re-design

    ApplicationDevelopment

    4 65% 260 If not handled properly, majorimpact on quality of product

    delivered to client base.

    Training early in theproject. Extensive quality

    assurance of process.Dedicate proper staffing.

    I t e m

    N o .

    P r o

    b a

    b i l i t y

    I m p a c

    t

    E x p o s u r e

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    33/40

    Set Risk Management Practices andPolicies

    Risk Management PlanSpecifies methods to identify, profile , assess, monitor, andhandle risksNames the risk officer Contains a budget and schedule reserveExample, next slide

    Risk ProfileThe likelihood, impact, trigger symptoms,monitoring methods, and response strategy foreach identified risk

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    34/40

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    35/40

    Risk Management Practices and Policies

    Risk OfficerPerson to oversee the identification, assessment,monitoring, and handling of project risks

    devils advocate usually not the project manager

    Risk Schedule and Budget ReserveTime and dollar amount in schedule and budget tocover risks

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    36/40

    Risk Management Practices and Policies

    Communicate RisksPolices, procedures, and culture to ensure projectmanager is always quickly informed aboutproblems and risks

    Standards and procedures for documentingthe project

    Good documentation (proposals, plans, work orders,change requests, reviews, and post-project summary

    reports) provides information necessary for identifyingrisks in future projects.Helps to identify risks on current project and predictrisks on future projects

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    37/40

    Columbia Space Shuttle

    Photos: Nasa.gov

    Photo released by Time Magazine,

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-05-02/shuttle-columbia-disintegrates/1870044http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-05-02/shuttle-columbia-disintegrates/1870044http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-05-02/shuttle-columbia-disintegrates/1870044http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/AC/aircraft/Space-Shuttle/heating.jpg
  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    38/40

    Tiles on space shuttle

    Photo by John Nicholas

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    39/40

    Criticality Index =f{P(tiles lost from debris or weak bonding),P(adjacent tiles lost),P(burn-through given tiles lost),P(failure of subsystems given burn-through),

    P(LOV/C given failure of subsystem)}

  • 8/10/2019 10.PM Risk Analysis

    40/40


Recommended