8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

1/14

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

2/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 2

Abstract

is ontribution resents t e simulation results or PHY er orman e

evaluation in terms o Pa et Error ate (PE ) ara teristi s as

un tions o Si nal-to- oise atio (S ) over 0 H annel

models or t e on eren e oom, ivin oom, and Enter riseubi le environments des ribin in [1]

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

3/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide

Introduction

e oal o t is ontribution is to illustrate PHY er orman e (PE vs

S urves) over develo ed 0 H annel models or t e

on eren e oom ( ), ivin oom ( ) and Enter rise ubi le

(E ) environments [1] Simulation results ere obtained or OFDM modulation and FE

s eme i is a standard onvolutional ode it ol nomials

{1 ,1 1 }

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

4/14

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

5/14

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

6/14

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

7/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide

Comparison of PER System Performance for LOS CR,

LR, and EC Channel Models for Omni-to-Omni Antenna

Configuration with AWGN Reference Curves

For PER=10-3 threshold:

CR PER curves for MCSs with code rate

have degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference performance ~0.4-0.7

dB.

CR PER curves for MCSs with code rate

have degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference performance ~1.4-1.9

dB.

LR PER curves for MCSs with code rate

have degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference performance ~1.2-1.6

dB.

LR PER curves for MCSs with code rate have degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference performance ~3.5-4.0

dB.

EC PER curves for STA near location

scenario demonstrate approximately the

same performance as for LR model (the

difference is less than 0.3 dB).

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

8/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide

PER System Performance for Different

MCSs for NLOS CR Channel Model d-d directional TX to directional RX

o-d omni TX to directional RX

For PER=10-3 threshold, CR

PER curves for different MCSs

for omni-to-directional antennaconfiguration in comparison

with directional-to-directional

case have performance loss

~0.3-1.5 dB.

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

9/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide

PER System Performance for Different

MCSs for NLOS LR Channel Model d-d directional TX to directional RX

o-d omni TX to directional RX

For PER=10-3 threshold, LR

PER curves for different MCSs

for omni-to-directional antennaconfiguration in comparison

with directional-to-directional

case have performance loss

~0.8-2.0 dB.

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

10/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 10

PER System Performance for Different

MCSs for NLOS EC Channel Model

For PER=10-3 threshold, EC

PER curves (far location

scenario) for different MCSs

for omni-to-directionalantenna configuration and

directional-to-directioanal

configuration have

approximately the same

performance (the difference

is less than 0.2 dB).

d-d directional TX to directional RX

o-d omni TX to directional RX

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

11/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 11

Comparison of PER System Performance for NLOS CR,

LR, and EC Channel Models for Directional-to-Directional

Antenna Configuration with AWGN Reference Curves

d-d directional TX to directional RX For PER=10-3 threshold CR and LR

PER curves demonstrate similar

system performance. In opposite

case, EC curves have sufficient

degradation.

For MCSs with code rate :

CR (or LR) PER curves have

degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference curves equal to ~

1.5-2.0 dB.

EC PER curves have degradation in

comparison with AWGN reference

curves equal to ~ 2.9-3.6 dB.

For MCSs with code rate : CR (or LR) PER curves have

degradation in comparison with

AWGN reference curves equal to ~

3.5 4.0 dB.

EC PER curves have degradation in

comparison with AWGN reference

curves equal to ~ 6.3-7 dB

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

12/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 12

Comparison of PER System Performance for NLOS CR,

LR, and EC Channel Models for Omni-to-Directional

Antenna Configuration o-d omni TX to directional RX

For PER=10-3 threshold:

LR PER curves for different

MCSs in comparison with CR

PER curves have performanceloss ~ 0.3 dB.

EC PER curves (far location

scenario) for different MCSs in

comparison with CR PER

curves have performance loss ~

1-1.8 dB.

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

13/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1

Conclusion

is ontribution illustrates PHY er orman e evaluation in terms o

Pa et Error ate (PE ) ara teristi s as un tions o Si nal-to- oise

atio (S ) or OFDM modulation and sim le FE s eme over 0

H annel models or t e on eren e oom, ivin oom andEnter rise ubi le environments

8/6/2019 11 10 0489-01-00ad Phy Performance Evaluation With 60 Ghz Wlan Channel Models

14/14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0489r1

Submission

May 2010

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1

References

1 IEEE do 02 11-0 /0 r annel models or 0 H W A

s stems, A Maltsev et al, Mar 2010

2 IEEE do 02 11-0 /02 r1 ad Evaluation Met odolo , Eldad

Pera ia, Jan 2010