Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | trevon-butters |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 3 times |
11
2
SERIOUS CRIME IN THE RSA: 2008/20092 098 229 CASES (2,1 MILLION)
CONTACT RELATED
141 107 CASES6,7%
CRIMES DEPENDANT ON POLICE ACTION187 382 CASES
8,9%
PROPERTY RELATED
532 184 CASES25,4%
OTHER SERIOUS CRIME
552 371 CASES26,3%
CONTACT CRIME685 185 CASES
32,7%
3
SERIOUS CRIME IN THE RSA: 2008/2009RATIO DECREASE/INCREASE IN SERIOUS CRIME IN THE RSA
TOTAL INCREASE +0,2%
CONTACT CRIME-2,8%
OTHER SERIOUS CRIME+2,9%
PROPERTY RELATED+0,3%
CRIMES DEPENDANT ON POLICE ACTION
+7,7%
CONTACT RELATED-3,9%
4
CONTACT CRIME IN THE RSA: 2008/2009685 185 (32,7%) - ONE THIRD
ATTEMPTED MURDER
18 298 CASES2,7%
SEXUAL OFFENCES71 500 CASES
10,4%
MURDER18 148 CASES
2,6%
COMMON ROBBERY59 232 CASES
8,6%ROBBERY WITH AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCES121 392 CASES
17,7%
ASSAULT GBH203 777 CASES
29,8%
COMMON ASSAULT192 838 CASES
28,1%
5
CONTACT CRIME IN THE RSA: 2008/2009RATIO DECREASE/INCREASE IN CONTACT CRIME IN THE RSA
TOTAL DECREASE -2,8%
ATTEMPTED MURDER
-4,3%
SEXUAL OFFENCES
10,1%
MURDER-3,4%
COMMON ROBBERY
-10,4%
ROBBERY WITH AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCES0,8%
ASSAULT GBH-4,7%
COMMON ASSAULT
-4,3%
6
Murder ratios from 1994/1995 to 2008/2009
62.8
37.338.6
40.5
39.540.3
42.7
47.447.8
49.8
52.5
59.8
59.5
67.967.2
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09
April to March
Rat
ios
Murder ratio decreased by 44,5% between 1994/1995 and 2008/2009
7
Motives and circumstances associated with murder
Category Reason Percentage Subtotal
Social behaviour Misunderstanding/argument 50,4%
Domestic-related 7,3%
Jealousy/love triangle 5,5%
Punishment 2,2% 65,4%
Criminal behaviour Consequence of another crime 15,9%
Self-defense 4,5%
Retaliation 2,6%
Concealment of birth 0,8%
Witchcraft-related 0,6%
Faction fight-related 0,6%
Result of law enforcement/ in line of duty 0,5%
Xenophobia-related 0,4%
Initiation-related 0,4% 26,3%
Group behaviour Vigilantism 4,8%
Gang-related 1,2%
Taxi violence 0,9% 6,9%
Accidents All accidental killings 1,5% 1,5%
Total 100,0% 100,0%
8
DIFFERENT SUBCATEGORIES OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERYDURING THE 2008/2009 FINANCIAL YEAR (TOTAL CASES 121 392)
TRUCKJACKING1 4371,2%
ROBBERY OF CASH IN TRANSIT
ROBBERY386
0,3%
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL
PREMISES13 92011,5%
CARJACKING14 91512,3%
BANK ROBBERY102
0,1%
PUBLIC STREET ROBBERY
72 19459,5%
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL
PREMISES18 43815,2%
0,7%
0,7%
0,9% 3,4%
9
DIFFERENT SUBCATEGORIES OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: 2008/2009RATIO DECREASE/INCREASE IN DIFFERENT SUBCATEGORIES OF
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: 2008/2009
TRUCKJACKING15,4%
ROBBERY OF CASH IN TRANSIT
ROBBERY-2,3%
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL
PREMISES41,1% CARJACKING
5,0%
BANK ROBBERY-29,2%
PUBLIC STREET ROBBERY
-7,4%
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL
PREMISES27,3%
3,4% 0,9%
0,7%
0,7%
10
TRIO CRIMES
04/05
101644
25145, (19,8%)
05/0627385, (22,9%)
92341
03/0426821, (20,1%)
106837
06/07
33049, (26,1%)
93509
07/08
38544, (32,6%)
79768
08/09
47273, (38,9%)
74119
1111
Public or street robbery decreased by 7,4% (-5 790) between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
105 690100 436
91 070
72 19477 984
92 021
0
25 000
50 000
75 000
100 000
125 000
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Raw
fig
ure
s
07/08 –15,3%
12
20 Stations recording the highest incidence of street robbery
Cumulative total : 21,2%
1. Durban Central (KZN) 11. Inanda (KZN)
2. Jhb Central (Gauteng) 12. Khayelitsha (WC)
3. Hillbrow (Gauteng) 13. Phoenix (KZN)
4. Mitchells Plain (WC) 14. Moroka (Gauteng)
5. Umlazi (KZN) 15. Temba (Gauteng)
6. KwaMashu (KZN) 16. Roodepoort (Gauteng)
7. Parkroad (FS) 17. Sunnyside (Gauteng)
8. Rustenburg (NW) 18. Kwadukuza (KZN)
9. Booysens (Gauteng) 19. Nyanga (WC)
10. Pta Central (Gauteng)
20. Pinetown (KZN)
12
TABLE 1
1313
18 438
14 481
9 3919 351
12 76110 173
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
20 000
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
w F
igu
res
Robbery at residential premises increased by 27,3% (3 957)
between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
07/08 +15,5%
1414
Robbery at residential premises sorted from lowest to highest increases between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
TABLE 2
Policing Area 2007/2008 2008/2009 Difference % Inc. or Dec.
RSA 14 481 18 438 3 957 27.3%
Gauteng 7 314 8 122 808 11.0%North West 821 987 166 20.2%Western Cape 796 974 178 22.4%Kwazulu-Natal 3 479 4 601 1 122 32.3%Mpumalanga 862 1 188 326 37.8%Limpopo 319 514 195 61.1%Free State 215 490 275 127.9%Eastern Cape 663 1 517 854 128.8%Northern Cape 12 45 33 275.0%
15
20 Stations recording the highest incidence of residential robbery
1. Sandton (Gauteng) 11. Rustenburg (NW)
2. Inanda (KZN) 12. Roodepoort (Gauteng)
3. Honeydew (Gauteng) 13. Kagiso (Gauteng)
4. KwaMashu (KZN) 14. Tembisa (Gauteng)
5. Wierdabrug (Gauteng) 15. Brooklyn (Gauteng)
6. Midrand (Gauteng) 16. Linden (Gauteng)
7. Douglasdale (Gauteng) 17. Edenvale (Gauteng)
8. Booysens (Gauteng) 18. Lenasia (Gauteng)
9. Empangeni (KZN) 19. Kwazakele (Eastern Cape)
10. Kwadukuza (KZN) 20. Umlazi (KZN)
Cumulative total : 20,8%
TABLE 3
1616
Carjacking increased by 5,0% (714) between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
14 91514 20113 599
12 825
12 434
13 793
0
3 500
7 000
10 500
14 000
17 500
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
w f
igu
res
07/08 +4,4%
1717
Carjacking sorted from highest decreases to highest increases between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009.
TABLE 4
Policing Area 2007/2008 2008/2009 Difference % Inc. or Dec.
RSA 14 201 14 915 714 5.0%
Western Cape 923 698 - 225 -24.4%North West 291 288 - 3 -1.0%Gauteng 7 466 7 626 160 2.1%KwaZulu-Natal 3 889 4 062 173 4.4%Eastern Cape 604 706 102 16.9%Northern Cape 5 7 2 40.0%Limpopo 203 289 86 42.4%Mpumalanga 664 984 320 48.2%Free State 156 255 99 63.5%
18
20 Stations recording the highest incidence of carjacking
1. Umlazi (KZN) 11. Sandton (Gauteng)
2. Chatsworth (KZN) 12. Sandringham (Gauteng)
3. Booysens (Gauteng) 13. Dobsonville (Gauteng)
4. Bramley (Gauteng) 14. Germiston (Gauteng)
5. Pinetown (KZN) 15. Moroka (Gauteng)
6. Jhb Central (Gauteng) 16. Empangeni (KZN)
7. Benoni (Gauteng) 17. Boksburg (Gauteng)
8. Isipingo (KZN) 18. Tembisa (Gauteng)
9. Bayview (KZN) 19. Hillbrow (Gauteng)
10. Phoenix (KZN) 20. Jeppe (Gauteng)
Cumulative total : 22,8%
TABLE 5
18
1919
Robbery at non-residential premises increased by 41,1% (4 058)
between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
3 6773 320
4 387
6 689
9 862
13 920
0
3 500
7 000
10 500
14 000
17 500
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Raw
fig
ure
s
07/08 +47,4%
20
Robbery at non-residential premises sorted from lowest to highest increases between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
TABLE 6
Policing Area 2007/2008 2008/2009 Difference % Inc. or Dec.
RSA 9 862 13 920 4 058 41.1%
Gauteng 5 098 6 216 1 118 21.9%KwaZulu-Natal 1 923 2 499 576 30.0%North West 747 1 043 296 39.6%Western Cape 635 1 058 423 66.6%Limpopo 314 529 215 68.5%Eastern Cape 488 851 363 74.4%Northern Cape 54 121 67 124.1%Free State 298 785 487 163.4%Mpumalanga 305 818 513 168.2%
21
20 Stations recording the highest incidence of robbery at non-residential premises
Cumulative total : 20,1%
1. Jhb Central (Gauteng) 11. Boksburg North (Gauteng)
2. Booysens (Gauteng) 12. Germiston (Gauteng)
3. Sandton (Gauteng) 13. Hillbrow (Gauteng)
4. Honeydew (Gauteng) 14. Pietermaritzburg (KZN)
5. Durban Central (KZN) 15. Roodepoort (Gauteng)
6. Rustenburg (NW) 16. Pretoria Central (Gauteng)
7. Kempton Park (Gauteng) 17. Springs (Gauteng)
8. Pinetown (KZN) 18. Elsburg (Gauteng)
9. Jeppe (Gauteng) 19. Randburg (Gauteng)
10. Benoni (Gauteng) 20. Greenwood Park (KZN)
TABLE 4unVao day nghe bai nay di ban http://nhatquanglan.xlphp.net/
TABLE 7
2222
The truckjacking increased by 15,4% (192) between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
1 4371 245
892 829 930 901
0
600
1 200
1 800
2 400
3 000
3 600
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Raw
fi
gu
res
07/08 +39,6%
2323
Truckjacking sorted from highest decreases to highest increases between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
TABLE 8
Province 2007/2008 2008/2009 Difference % Inc. or Dec.
RSA 1245 1 437 192 15.4%
Northern Cape 1 0 - 1 -100.0%North West 77 64 - 13 -16.9%KwaZulu-Natal 133 133 0 0.0%Eastern Cape 28 30 2 7.1%Mpumalanga 151 172 21 13.9%Western Cape 23 27 4 17.4%Gauteng 754 891 137 18.2%Free State 64 93 29 45.3%Limpopo 14 27 13 92.9%
24
20 Stations recording the highest incidence of Truckjacking
Cumulative total : 36,3%
1. Heidelberg (Gauteng) 11. Westonaria (Gauteng)
2. Vereeniging (Gauteng) 12. Kliprivier (Gauteng)
3. Midrand (Gauteng) 13. Benoni (Gauteng)
4. Vosloorus (Gauteng) 14. Leslie (Mpumalanga)
5. Delmas (Mpumalanga) 15. Krugersdorp (Gauteng)
6. Zonkizizwe (Gauteng) 16. Kempton Park (Gauteng)
7. Olifantsfontein (Gauteng) 17. Grootvlei (Mpumalanga)
8. Wierdabrug (Gauteng) 18. Nigel (Gauteng)
9. Muldersdrift (Gauteng) 19. Brakpan (Gauteng)
10. Springs (Gauteng) 20. Ratanda (Gauteng)
TABLE 9
2525
The CIT robberies decreased by 2,3% (-9)between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
467
395 386383
220192
0
80
160
240
320
400
480
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
w f
igu
res
07/08 –15,4%
2626
Bank robbery decreased by -29,2% (-42)between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Subcategory of aggravated robbery
102
144129
5958
54
0
80
160
240
320
400
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
w f
igu
res
07/08 +11,6%
27
ATM BOMBINGS AND CIT ROBBERIES DURING THE 2007/2008 AND 2008/2009 FINANCIAL YEARS
2527
45
39
47
41
71
48
41
58
13
17
2522
4744
28
18
32
27
23
36
29
35
45
27
35
28
33 28
24
12
30
39
33
30
3437
323131
2926 26
3637
31
36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Apr-07
May-07
Jun-07
Jul-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Nov-07
Dec-07
Jan-08
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
May-08
Jun-08
Jul-08
Aug-08
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-09
Feb-09
Mar-09
Cas
es
ATM
CIT
2828
1.2.1 Arson
1.2.2 Malicious damage to property
2929
The arson ratio decreased by 9,0%between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Contact-related crime
14.115.5
16.616.317.6
19.0
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
15.0
18.0
21.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
tio
s
07/08 –6,6%
3030
The malicious damage ratio decreased by 3,6% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Contact-related crime
341.2323.7
307.7
302.5286.2 275.8
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
tio
s
07/08 –5,4%
3131
1.3.1 Burglary at residential premises
1.3.2 Burglary at non-residential premises
1.3.3 Theft of motor vehicles and motorcycles
1.3.4 Theft out of or from motor vehicles
1.3.5 Stock-theft
3232
The burglary at residential premises ratio increased by 1,9% between 2007/2008 and
2008/2009
Property-related crime
506.5497.1526.8559.9592.8
645.2
0.0
101.0
202.0
303.0
404.0
505.0
606.0
707.0
808.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 –5,6%
3333
The burglary at non-residential premises ratio increased by 9,2% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Property-related crime
139.3
120.3116.0 123.3
131.7143.8
0.0
30.5
61.0
91.5
122.0
152.5
183.0
213.5
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 +6,8%
3434
The theft of vehicle and motorcycle ratio decreased by 7,0% between 2007/2008 and
2008/2009
Property-related crime
190.0
180.0 156.0167.7
182.1183.3
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 –7,9%
3535
The theft out of/from vehicle ratio decreased by 3,6% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Property-related crime
370.8
318.8 296.6261.7
233.4 225.0
0.0
90.0
180.0
270.0
360.0
450.0
540.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 –10,8%
3636
The stock-theft ratio increased by 2,7% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Property-related crime
61.760.1
60.861.3
70.189.0
0.0
20.5
41.0
61.5
82.0
102.5
123.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
tio
s
07/08 –1,2%
3737
1.4.1 Illegal possession of firearms and
ammunition
1.4.2 Drug-related crimes
1.4.3 Driving under the influence of alcohol
or drugs
3838
The illegal possession of firearms ratio increased by 2,1% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Crime heavily dependent on police action for detection
33.3
36.3
28.730.3
28.2 28.8
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 -6,9%
3939
The drug-related crime ratio increased by 5,5% between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Crime heavily dependent on police action for detection
135.1 180.3
204.1220.9
228.1
240.7
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 +3,3%
4040
The driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs ratio increased by 14,0% between
2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Crime heavily dependent on police action for detection
53.7 64.2 70.6
80.7
101.2
115.4
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 +25,4%
4141
1.5.1 All theft not mentioned elsewhere
1.5.2 Commercial crime
1.5.3 Shoplifting
4242
The other theft ratio decreased by 2,0%between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Other serious crime
1 307.5
1 151.1
922.7 876.0 826.1 809.5
0.0
250.0
500.0
750.0
1 000.0
1 250.0
1 500.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Ra
tio
s
07/08 –5,7%
4343
Other serious crime
130.2 136.4
159.1
115.6115.8120.4
0.0
30.0
60.0
90.0
120.0
150.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
The commercial crime ratio increased by 16,6%between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
07/08 +4,8%
4444
The shoplifting ratio increased by 18,5%between 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
Other serious crime
155.0142.8
137.5 138.2 140.0
165.9
0.0
44.0
88.0
132.0
176.0
2003/ 20042004/ 2005
2005/ 20062006/ 2007
2007/ 20082008/ 2009
April to March
Rat
ios
07/08 +1,3%
4545
End of presentation
THANK YOU
46
47
Registered cases and verdicts
Crime categoryCorresponded with original
registration Verdicts eventually obtained
Murder 56,9% Culpable homicide: 34,6%
Assault GBH: 5,7%
Attempted murder 58,7% Assault GBH: 25,0%
Firearm related: 6,7%
48
MURDER - ANALYSIS
▪ Cause of death:
▫ Stab 54,0%
▫ Shot 28,0%
▫ Hit 14,0%
▫ Strangulation 2,0%
▫ Other 2,0%
49
Crime Nr of cases analysed
Withdrawn Unfounded Undetected Guilty Acquitted Otherwise finalised
Crime found guilty of as percentage[1] of total number of cases found guilty
Murder 938 28.3%[2] 0.3% 17.3% 33.9% 19.8% 0.4% Murder - 56.9%Culpable homicide - 34.6%Assault GBH - 5.7%Robbery Aggravated - 0.9%Illegal possession firearm - 0.9%Common Assault - 0.6%Rape - 0.3%
Attempted Murder
1145 47.1% 1.0% 37.3% 9.1% 5.5% 0.1% Attempted Murder - 58.7%Assault GBH - 25.0%Unlawful discharging firearm - 3.8%Illegal possession firearm - 2.9%Robbery Aggravated - 2.9%Rape - 1.9%Pointing of firearm - 1.9%Traffic related offences - 1.9%Conspiracy to commit crime - 1.0%
Assault GBH
2024 59.3% 1.0% 25.3% 10.2% 4.2% - Assault GBH - 93.0%Common Assault - 5.3%Attempted murder - 0.5%Rape - 0.5%Robbery aggravated - 0.5%Contempt of court - 0.5%
[1] Crimes are registered by the police according to the evidence contained in the docket. The crime of which the perpetrator may be found guilty of may differ from the former as a result of legal and technical aspects that may arose during the trail.
[2] Some of the dockets disposed of as withdrawn, eg where the victim died of natural causes, committed suicide, drowned or died as result of an accident were supposed to be disposed of as unfounded. A substantial number of cases where inquest dockets were opened were also erroneously disposed of as withdrawn, as in some of these cases it could be found during the inquest that the offenders were unknown and have to be dispose of as undetected.
DISPOSAL OF CONTACT CRIME CASE DOCKETS: CASES REPORTED DURING 2000
50
DISPOSAL OF CONTACT CRIME CASE DOCKETS: CASES REPORTED DURING 2000
Crime Nr of cases analysed
Withdrawn Unfounded Undetected Guilty Acquitted Otherwise finalised
Crime found guilty of as percentage of total number of cases found guilty
Common Assault
1588 67.9% 1.1% 17.4% 11.6% 1.9% - Common Assault - 94.1%Assault GBH - 2.7%Rape - 1.1%Theft other - 1.1%Intimidation - 0.5%Hindering in execution of duties - 0.5%
Aggravated robbery
1564 16.8% 0.6% 75.0% 4.6% 2.9% 0.1% Aggravated robbery - 81.9%Common Robbery - 6.9%Assault GBH - 5.6%Theft Other - 2.8%Rape - 1.4%Possession of stolen property - 1.4%
Common Robbery
1054 29.1% 1.1% 62.1% 4.3% 3.3% - Common Robbery 24 (53.3%)Assault common - 24.4%Robbery Aggravated - 11.1%Theft Other - 8.9%Rape - 2.2%
Rape 1316 51.7% 1.1% 25.2% 9.6% 12.0% 0.3% Rape - 92.8%Assault GBH - 3.2%Assault Common - 1.6%Common Robbery - 1.6%Abduction - 0.8%
51
STREET ROBBERY - ANALYSIS
■ Vicinity
▪ Township 41%
▪ CBD (inner city) 31%
▪ Suburb 20%
▪ Remote area 4%
▪ Traditional village 2%
52
STREET ROBBERY - ANALYSIS
■ Day of week
▪ Sunday 13%
▪ Monday 14%
▪ Tuesday 11%
▪ Wednesday 12%
▪ Thursday 14%
▪ Friday 18%
▪ Saturday 18%
53
STREET ROBBERY - ANALYSIS
■ Time of day
▪ 00:00 – 02:59 3%
▪ 03:00 – 05:59 5%
▪ 06:00 – 08:59 7%
▪ 09:00 – 11:59 10%
▪ 12:00 – 14:59 14%
▪ 15:00 – 17:59 18%
▪ 18:00 – 20:59 28%
▪ 21:00 – 23:59 15%
54
STREET ROBBERY - ANALYSIS
■ Instrument used
▪ Firearm 57%
▪ Knife 38%
▪ Blunt object 5%
55
STREET ROBBERY - ANALYSIS
■ Items taken (% do not add to 100,0% - various items sometimes robbed) ▪ Cellular telephone 64%▪ Cash 50%▪ Personal items
(e.g. driver’s license, ID) 11%▪ Clothing 9%▪ Jewellery 7%
56
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Vicinity
▪ Township 45%
▪ Suburb 43%
▪ Informal settlement 4%
▪ Traditional village 4%
▪ Farm / smallholding 2%
57
SANDTON TRIO CRIMES
2008-04-01 TO 2009-03-31
58
41 4046
81 8070 68
7765 67
5449
0
20
40
60
80
100
1January February March April May June
July August September October November December
TRIO CRIMES : PER MONTH
Offence January February March April May June July August September October November December Grand Total
Business Robbery 8 8 6 12 14 21 16 11 19 18 12 15 160
Carjacking 8 10 10 20 9 12 15 21 14 12 13 9 153
House Robbery 25 22 30 49 57 37 37 45 32 37 29 25 425
Grand Total 41 40 46 81 80 70 68 77 65 67 54 49 738
59
30 3120 20 20 17 2222 17 18 23 23 20
3032
5157
8471
80
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sunda
y
Mon
day
Tuesd
ay
Wedn
esda
y
Thurs
day
Friday
Satur
day
Business Robbery Carjacking House Robbery
17 1726
17
4637
611
2835
50
23
5950
86
68 69
93
0
20
40
60
80
100
00 and 04 04 and 08 08 and 12 12 and 16 16 and 20 20 and 00
Business Robbery Carjacking House Robbery
DAYS
TIMES
60
61
Offence Suburb Total
Business Robbery
Sandown 19
Edenburg 15
Bryanston 14
Rivonia 14
Business Robbery Total 62
Carjacking
Kelvin 24
Buccleuch 23
Parkmore 16
Carjacking Total 63
House Robbery
Buccleuch 60
Bryanston 47
Kelvin 46
House Robbery Total 153
Grand Total 278
TOP 3 SUBURBS
62
Offence Suburb Street Total
Business Robbery
Sandown Cnr Rivonia Road And Grayston Drive 3
Gwen Lane 2
Cnr Rivonia Road And Maude Street 2
Business Robbery Total 11
Carjacking
Kelvin President Way 3
Robin Way 2
Louise Way 2
Meadway Mews Unknown 2
North Way 2
Cnr North Way And Cone Way 2
Kelvin Total 13
Carjacking Total 30
PROBLEMATIC STREETS
63
PROBLEMATIC STREETSOffence Suburb Street Total
House Robbery
Sandown
Webber Road 2
Helen Road 2
Willowbrooke Place 1
Cnr Adrienne Street And Aston Street 1
Cnr Aston Street And Edward Rubenstein Drive 1
Cnr Daisy Street And Grayston Drive 1
Cnr Edward Rubenstein Drive And David Street 1
Cnr Fredman Drive And West Street 1
Cnr Linden Street And Daisy Street 1
Edward Rubenstein Drive 1
Adrienne Street 1
Peppertree Lane 1
Rivonia Road 1
Tamar Street 1
Adolf Street 1
Westbrooke Drive 1
Sandown Total 18
House Robbery Total 45
64
BUSINESS ROBBERY: SANDOWN
65
CARJACKING: KELVIN
66
BUSINESS ROBBERY: BUCCLEUCH
67
Incident ComponentCase Nr.
Complaint Nr.
Month OffenceDay of Month (Begin)
Day of Month (End)
Day of WeekTime
(Begin)Time
Time (End)
22 Sandton354/4/2008 1 April Carjacking 2008/04/09 2008/04/09 Wednesday 17:30
16 and 20 17:30
26 Sandton493/4/2008 1 April
House Robbery 2008/04/09 2008/04/09 Wednesday 23:00
20 and 00 23:15
Place StreetStreet
Nr.Suburb Method Instrument Race Gender Age Name
Vehicle Type
Vehicle Make
UnknownMuller North 115 Buccleuch
Pointing (Firearm)
Fire-Arm (Pistol, Revolver) White Female 48
Florina Constantinesou Sedan Opel
UnknownJohn Street 28A Buccleuch
Pointing (Firearm)
Fire-Arm (Pistol, Revolver) White Male 63
Malcolm Mcnichols Unknown Unknown
68
Reg. Nr. Colour Items Race Gender Age NameNr. of
AccusedRace Gender Nationality
RLY897GP Silver Unknown White Female 48Florina Constantinesou 0 Unknown Unknown Unknown
Unknown UnknownJewelery(Jewelery,Camera,Cellphone) White Male 63
Malcolm Mcnichols 0 Unknown Unknown Unknown
Id. Nr. Name Alias Comment
Unknown Unknown UnknownComplainant Was Coming Home From Work,And As She Stoped By Her Gate,About Six Black Males Got Out The Taxi And One With Firearm,And Robbed Her Jewelery And Vehicle And Drove Off.No Shots Were Fired.
Unknown Unknown Unknown
The Complainant Was Busy Undressing Preparing Himself To Retire For The Night.He Then Saw An African Male Poiting Him With A Gun Through The Window .He Screamed And His Wife Woke Up.The Suspect Shouted At Him,Saying He Will Shoot Him If He Doesn'T Keep His Mouth Shut.The Suspect Tried To Jump Into The Bedroom Through The Window,He Tried To Push The Suspect Back But With- Out Success Since The Suspect Managed To Force His Way Into The Bedroom.The Suspect Then Went For Wife,S Finger And Grabbed Her Ring Off,Poiting Them With A Gun.She Then Took It Off And Handed It To Him.The Second Suspect Was Not Armed.They Also Roobed Them Of A Cellphone And A Camera.The Firearm Was Black With A Long Barrel.His Wife Managed To Press A Panic Button And They Fled The Scene On Foot.One Suspect Was Thin,Pale In Complexion And Was Average In Height.The Complainant Remember Bitting The Suspect Who Had A Gun Very Hard On His Hand.
69
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Access to premises
▪ Forced entry 56%
▪ Unforced entry 40%
▪ Let in by 3rd person 4%
70
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Day of week
▪ Sunday 17%
▪ Monday 13%
▪ Tuesday 13%
▪ Wednesday 15%
▪ Thursday 14%
▪ Friday 16%
▪ Saturday 13%
71
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Time of day
▪ 00:00 – 02:59 20%
▪ 03:00 – 05:59 13%
▪ 06:00 – 08:59 6%
▪ 09:00 – 11:59 9%
▪ 12:00 – 14:59 7%
▪ 15:00 – 17:59 4%
▪ 18:00 – 20:59 18%
▪ 21:00 – 23:59 24%
72
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Instrument used
▪ Firearm 77%
▪ Knife 12%
▪ Hand / fist 6%
▪ Blunt object 2%
▪ Other sharp object 2%
73
ROBBERY AT RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Items taken (% do not add to 100,0% - various items sometimes robbed)▪ Cash 59%▪ Cellular telephone 55%▪ Jewellery 22%▪ Clothing 20%▪ Television set 19%▪ DVD player 16%▪ Computer / Laptop 12%▪ Vehicle 11%▪ Personal items
(e.g. driver’s license, ID)11%
74
TYPES OF BUSINESS
TYPES OF BUSINESS %
General dealer (Butcher, Café, etc) 17,0%
Spaza shop 16,6%
Garage / Petrol station 9,9%
Cellular telephone shops 8,7%
Construction Company 4,3%
Liquor store 4,3%
Fast food outlet (e.g. KFC) 4,0%
Clothing shops 4,0%
Supermarket (e.g. Spar, Pick ‘n Pay) 4,0%
75
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Vicinity
▪ CBD (inner city) 49%
▪ Township 29%
▪ Suburb 14%
▪ Traditional village 4%
▪ Farm / smallholdings / estate 2%
76
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Day of week
▪ Sunday 12%
▪ Monday 12%
▪ Tuesday 13%
▪ Wednesday 14%
▪ Thursday 13%
▪ Friday 23%
▪ Saturday 12%
77
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Time of day▪ 00:00 – 02:59 7%▪ 03:00 – 05:59 4%▪ 06:00 – 08:59 7%▪ 09:00 – 11:59 16%▪ 12:00 – 14:59 13%▪ 15:00 – 17:59 15%▪ 18:00 – 20:59 23%▪ 21:00 – 23:59 15%
78
ROBBERY AT NON-RESIDENTIAL PREMISES - ANALYSIS
■ Instrument used
▪ Firearm 87%
▪ Knife 12%
■ Items taken (% do not add to 100,0% - various items sometimes robbed)
▪ Cash 79%
▪ Cellular telephone 43%
▪ Food / Alcohol 20%