+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

Date post: 29-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: lucas-floyd
View: 217 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
33
1 Food Webs Chapter 17
Transcript
Page 1: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

11

Food WebsChapter 17

Page 2: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

22

Figure 17_01

Page 3: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

33

Food WebsChapter 17

Page 4: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

44

Food Web Complexity

• Winemiller described feeding relations among tropical freshwater fish.

– Represented food webs in various ways:• Only included common species.• Top-predator sink.• Excluded weakest trophic links.

Page 5: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

55

Food Web Complexity

Fresh water fish community in Argentina

Page 6: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

66

Strong Interactions and Food Web Structure

• Tscharntke studied food webs associated with wetland reeds (Phragmites australis).– Attacked by fly Giraudiella inclusa.• Attacked by 14 species of parasitoid wasps.

– Predator specialization

– Distinguished weak and strong interactions.• Determination of keystone species.

Page 7: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

77

Page 8: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

88

Figure 17_05

Page 9: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

99

What appears as competition in food webs may not always be…

Is this relationship mutualistic, commensalistic or exploitative?

Direct or indirect?

Page 10: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1010

Figure 17_07

Page 11: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1111

Figure 17_08

Page 12: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1212

Page 13: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1313

Page 14: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1414

What explains the greater diversity in the subtropical system?

Page 15: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1515

Food Web Structure and Species Diversity

• Paine found as number of species in intertidal food webs increased, proportion of the web represented by predators also increased.– According to his hypothesis, higher proportion of

predators produces higher predation pressure on prey populations, in turn promoting higher diversity.• Removal of starfish (top predator) caused decline in

diversity from 15 to 8 species.

Page 16: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1616

Keystone Species

• If keystone species reduce likelihood of competitive exclusion, their activities would increase the number of species that could coexist in communities.

Page 17: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1717

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

• Lubchenko proposed to resolve the effect herbivores have on plant diversity, you need to know:– Herbivore food preference.– Competitive relationships between plant species

in the local community.– Variance in feeding preferences and competitive

relationships across environments.

Page 18: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1818

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

Page 19: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

1919

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

• Lubchenko studied influence of intertidal snail (Littorina littorea) on structure of an algal community. – Snails fed on green (Enteromorpha spp.) and red

(Chondrus crispus) algae.• Under normal conditions, Enteromorpha out-competes

Chondrus in tide pools, and Littornia prefers Enteromorpha.– In the absence of snails, Chondrus is competitively displaced.

Page 20: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2020

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

• When snails are present in high densities, Littorina grazes down Enteromorpha, releasing Chondrus from competition.– Green crabs (Carcinus maenus) prey on young

snails, preventing juveniles from colonizing tide pools.

– Populations of Carcinus are controlled by seagulls.

Page 21: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2121

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

– Low snail density - Enteromorpha dominates tide pool.

– Medium snail density - Competitive exclusion eliminated, and algal diversity increased.

– High snail density - Feeding requirements are high enough that snails eat preferred algae and less-preferred algae.• Algal diversity decreased.

Page 22: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2222

Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity

Page 23: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2323

Fish as River Keystone Species

Page 24: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2424

Page 25: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2525

Keystone Species: Summation

• Power : Keystone species exert strong effects on their community structure, despite low biomass.

Page 26: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2626

Exotic Predators

• Exotic species have dramatic impacts on communities because they were outside the evolutionary experience of local prey populations.– Nile Perch (Lates nilotica) exotic fish predator in

Lake Victoria.• Fish fauna dramatically reduced.

Page 27: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2727

Exotic Predators

Page 28: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2828

Exotic Predators

Page 29: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

2929

Exotic Predators

• Kaufman pointed out changes in Lake Victoria fish community coincide with other ecosystem changes.– Dissolved oxygen concentrations significantly

decreased.– Cultural eutrophication.

Page 30: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

3030

Mutulaistic Keystone Species

• Cleaner fish in Red Sea coral reef communities…

Page 31: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

3131

Seed Dispersal Mutualists as Keystone Species

• Christian observed native ants disperse 30% of shrubland seeds in fynbos of South Africa.– Seed-dispersing ants bury seeds in sites safe from

predators and fire.• Argentine ants have displaced many native ant species that

disperse large seeds.– Substantial reductions in seedling recruitment by plants producing

large seeds.

Page 32: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

3232

Homo sapiens as Keystone Species

23 – 60 million animals killed yearly in Brazilian Amazon…Reducing bird and mammal biomass in some areas by 70-90%.

“We must not let a forest full of trees fool us into believing all is well.” Kent Redford

Page 33: 11 Food Webs Chapter 17. 22 Figure 17_01 33 Food Webs Chapter 17.

3333


Recommended