+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

Date post: 20-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: lythu
View: 231 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
24
117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter presents the detailed survey conducted in two manufacturing organizations. These manufacturing organizations are actors in the context of present study. The objective of carrying out case studies was to critically analyze various facets of working of these organizations in general and processes followed for achieving strategic flexibility. These case studies were conducted in a phased manner starting from the evolution of the need for achieving the strategic flexibility with the help of dynamic capabilities in different manufacturing organizations. The present status, performance and financial indicators, process of dynamic capabilities achieved have also been studied. The detailed analysis of the case studies has been carried out and their results have depicted the industrial scenario regarding the research objective. The preliminary data provided by the survey has been validated by these case studies. To carry out case studies, the basis for selection of organizations has been discussed in Chapter – III, Design of the Study. Furthermore, the role of dynamic capabilities, effect of competitors’ strategies and environmental factors for achieving strategic flexibility have been collected and analyzed through case studies. The preliminary information provided by the survey has been validated by these case studies and the synthesis of the two will provide the required results. To carry out case studies, the basis for selection of organizations has been already discussed and presented in Chapter III, Design of Study. Accordingly, the case studies have been conducted at: Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), Rajpura Swaraj Mazda Ltd. (SML)), Ropar
Transcript
Page 1: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

117

CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES

5.1 Introduction

This chapter presents the detailed survey conducted in two manufacturing

organizations. These manufacturing organizations are actors in the context of present

study. The objective of carrying out case studies was to critically analyze various facets

of working of these organizations in general and processes followed for achieving

strategic flexibility. These case studies were conducted in a phased manner starting from

the evolution of the need for achieving the strategic flexibility with the help of dynamic

capabilities in different manufacturing organizations. The present status, performance

and financial indicators, process of dynamic capabilities achieved have also been

studied. The detailed analysis of the case studies has been carried out and their results

have depicted the industrial scenario regarding the research objective. The preliminary

data provided by the survey has been validated by these case studies. To carry out case

studies, the basis for selection of organizations has been discussed in Chapter – III,

Design of the Study.

Furthermore, the role of dynamic capabilities, effect of competitors’ strategies

and environmental factors for achieving strategic flexibility have been collected and

analyzed through case studies. The preliminary information provided by the survey has

been validated by these case studies and the synthesis of the two will provide the

required results.

To carry out case studies, the basis for selection of organizations has been

already discussed and presented in Chapter III, Design of Study. Accordingly, the case

studies have been conducted at:

• Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), Rajpura

• Swaraj Mazda Ltd. (SML)), Ropar

Page 2: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

118

5.2 Hindustan Unilever limited

Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) is one of the largest consumer

goods companies of India. HUL is owned by the British-Dutch

company Unilever which controls 67% majority stake in HUL. The major products of

HUL include foods and health, beverages, cleaning agents and personal care products.

HUL was formed in 1933 and was named as Lever Brothers India Limited and

later in 1956 was named as Hindustan Lever Limited through a merger of Lever

Brothers, Hindustan Vanaspati Mfg. Co. Ltd. and United Traders Ltd. Presently HUL is

headquartered in Mumbai, India and has employee strength of over 16,000. It also

contributes to indirect employment of over 65,000 people. The company was renamed

as “Hindustan Unilever Limited” in June 2007.

Lever Brothers started its actual operations in India in the summer of 1888, when

crates full of Sunlight soap bars, embossed with the words "Made in England by Lever

Brothers" were shipped to the Kolkata harbor and it began an era of marketing branded

Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG).

Hindustan Unilever's distribution covers over 2 million retail outlets across India

directly and its products are available in over 6.4 million outlets in the country. As per

Nielsen market research data, two out of three Indians use HUL products.

HUL is the market leader in Indian consumer products with presence in over 20

consumer categories such as soaps, tea, detergents and shampoos amongst others with

over 700 million Indian consumers using its products. Eighteen of HUL's brands

featured in the ACNielsen Brand Equity list of 100 Most Trusted Brands Annual Survey

(2012).

The company has a distribution channel of 6.3 million outlets and owns 35 major

Indian brands.

5.2.1 Business Initiatives and Strategy

The snapshot of the milestone achieved and the business strategy decisions are

delineated and presented in the Table 5.1.

Page 3: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

119

.

Table 5.1 The snapshot of the achieved milestone at HUL

Year Snapshot of achieved milestone by the company

1888 • Sunlight soap introduced in India.

1895 • Lifebuoy soap launched; Lever Brothers appoints agents in Mumbai, Chennai,

Kolkata, and Karachi.

1902 • Pears soap introduced in India

1903 • Brooke Bond Red Label tea launched

1905 • Lux flakes introduced.

1913 • Vim scouring powder introduced

1914 • Vinolia soap launched in India.

1918 • Vanaspati introduced by Dutch margarine manufacturers like Van den Berghs,

Jurgens, Verschure Creameries, and Hartogs.

1922 • Rinso soap powder introduced.

1925 • Lever Brothers gets full control of North West Soap Company.

1926 • Hartogs registers Dalda Trademark.

1930 • Unilever is formed on January 1.

1931 • Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing Company registered on November 27

• Sewri factory site bought.

1932 • Vanaspati manufacture starts at Sewri.

1933 • Application made for setting up soap factory next to the Vanaspati factory at Sewri;

Lever Brothers India Limited incorporated on October 17.

1934 • Soap manufacture begins at Sewri factory in October; North West Soap Company's

Garden Reach Factory, Kolkata rented and expanded to produce Lever brands.

1935 • United Traders incorporated on May 11 to market Personal Products.

1939 • Garden Reach Factory purchased outright; concentration on building up Dalda

Vanaspati as a brand.

1941 • Agencies in Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata and Karachi taken over.

1943 • Personal Products manufacture begins in India at Garden Reach Factory.

1947 • Pond's Cold Cream launched.

Page 4: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

120

1951 • Shamnagar, Tiruchy, and Ghaziabad Vanaspati factories bought.

1956 • Three companies merge to form Hindustan Unilever Limited, with 10% Indian equity participation.

1957 • Unilever Special Committee approves research activity by Hindustan Unilever.

1958 • Research Unit starts functioning at Mumbai Factory.

1959 • Surf launched.

1962 • Formal Exports Department starts.

1963 • Head Office building at Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai opened.

1964 • Etah dairy set up, Anik ghee launched; Animal feeds plant at Ghaziabad; Sunsilk shampoo launched.

1965 • Signal toothpaste launched; Indian shareholding increases to 14%.

1966 • Lever's baby food, more new foods introduced; Nickel catalyst production begins; Indian shareholding increases to 15%. Statutory price control on Vanaspati; Taj Mahal tea launched.

1967 • Hindustan Unilever Research Centre opens in Mumbai.

1968 • Fine Chemicals Unit commissioned at Andheri; informal price control on soap begins.

1969 • Rin bar launched; Fine Chemicals Unit starts production; Bru coffee launched

1971 • Clinic shampoo launched.

1974 • Pilot plant for industrial chemicals at Taloja; informal price control on soaps withdrawn; Liril marketed.

1975 • Ten-year modernization plan for soaps and detergent plants; Jammu project work begins; Close-up toothpaste launched.

1976 • Construction work of Haldia chemicals complex begins; Taloja chemicals unit begins functioning.

1977 • Jammu synthetic Detergents plant inaugurated; Indian shareholding increases to 18.57%.

1978 • Fair & Lovely skin cream launched. 1979

• Sodium Tripolyphospate plant at Haldia commissioned.

1982 • Government allows 51% Unilever shareholding.

1984 • Foods, Animal Feeds businesses transferred to Lipton.

1986 • Agri-products unit at Hyderabad starts functioning - first range of hybrid seeds comes

out; Khamgaon Soaps unit and Yavatmal Personal Products unit start production.

1988 • Launch of Lipton Taaza tea.

Page 5: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

121

1991 • Surf Ultra detergent launched.

1992 • HUL recognized by Government of India as Star Trading House in Exports.

1993 • The erstwhile Brooke Bond India acquires the Kissan brand from the United Breweries Group, giving HUL an entry into the foods business.

1994 • HUL's largest competitor, Tata Oil Mills Company (TOMCO), merges with the company, the biggest such in Indian industry till that time.

1995

• HUL forms Unilever Nepal Limited, HUL and US-based Kimberley-Clark Corporation form 50:50 joint venture - Kimberley-Clark Lever Ltd. - to market Huggies diapers and Kotex feminine care products. Factory set up at Pune in 1995; HUL acquires Kwality and Milkfood 100% brand names and distribution assets. HUL introduces Wall's.

1996 • HUL and Indian cosmetics major, Lakme Ltd., form 50:50 joint ventures - Lakme

Lever Ltd.; HUL enters branded staples business with salt; HUL recognized as Super Star Trading House.

1996 • Merger of Group company, Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited, with HUL, with effect from January 1; HUL introduces branded atta; Surf Excel launched.

1997 • Unilever sets up International Research Laboratory in Bangalore; new Regional Innovation Centres also come up.

1998 • Group Company, Pond's India Ltd., merges with HUL with effect from January 1,

1998. HUL acquires Lakme brand, factories and Lakme Ltd.'s 50% equity in Lakme Lever Ltd.

2000 • HUL acquires 74% stake in Modern Food Industries Ltd., the first public sector company to be disinvested by the Government of India.

2002 • HUL enters Ayurvedic health & beauty centre category with the Ayush range and Ayush Therapy Centres.

2003 • Launch of Hindustan Lever Network; acquisition of the Amalgam Group

2004 • Launch of "Pureit" water purifiers

2006 • Brookefields food operations moved to Mumbai

2007 • Company name formally changed to Hindustan Unilever Limited after receiving the approval of share holders during the 74th AGM on 18 May 2007

2010 • HUL head office shifted from the landmark Lever House, at Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai to the new campus in Andheri (E), Mumbai.

2012

• HUL’s state of the art Learning Centre was inaugurated at the Hindustan Unilever campus at Andheri, Mumbai.

• Customer Insight & Innovation Centre (CiiC) was inaugurated at the Hindustan Unilever campus at Andheri, Mumbai.

• Won the Golden Peacock Occupational Health and Safety Award for 2012 in the FMCG category for its safety and health initiatives and continuous improvement on key metrics

Page 6: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

122

5.2.2 Company Facilities

Hindustan unilever owns 45 main units and has over 50 third party units in India

with a range of 65 brands spanning 20 distinct categories such as food and healthcare,

soaps, detergents, shampoos, skin care, toothpastes, deodorants, cosmetics, tea, coffee,

and water purifiers etc. Its main portfolio includes leading household brands such as

Lux, Lifebuoy, Surf Excel, Rin, Wheel, Fair & Lovely, Pond’s, Vaseline, Lakmé, Dove,

Clinic Plus, Sunsilk, Pepsodent, Closeup, Axe, Brooke Bond, Bru, Knorr, Kissan,

Kwality Wall’s and Pureit.

The Company has over 16,000 employees and has an annual turnover of around

Rs. 21,736 crores (financial year 2011 - 2012). HUL is a subsidiary of Unilever, one of

the world’s leading suppliers of fast moving consumer goods with strong local roots in

more than 100 countries across the globe with annual sales of about €46.5 billion in

2011. Unilever has about 52% shareholding in HUL.

5.2.3 Business Performance of HUL

For the year 2011-2012, the domestic consumer business of the company grew

by 18% with 9% underlying volume growth. Profit Before Interest and Tax (PBIT) grew

by 25% with PBIT margin improving 140 basis points. Profit After Tax but before

exceptional items, PAT (bei), grew by 20% to Rs.2,592 crore with Net Profit at

Rs.2,691 crore growing 17%.

About 60% of the total portfolios of the company were touched by innovations

during last year. About one million new stores were added by the company, and the

coverage was doubled during last year.

Company’s net profit grew by 17%

The snapshot of the performance of the company and trends in various performance

indicators are listed below:

Page 7: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

123

Profit after tax (Rs in crores) Earning per share (Rs. In crores)

Net sales (Rs. In crores) EBIT (% of sales)

HUL share price (Rs.)

Figure 5.1 Business performance of HUL during last five years

050

100150200250300350400450

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

1111.5

1212.5

1313.5

1414.5

0

100

200

300

400

500

Page 8: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

124

5.2.4 Dynamic capabilities at HUL

Human Resources

The Company has a very large employee base with over 16,000 employees

working for the organization. The company gives special emphasis on organizing

various programmes for imparting training and knowledge to the employees in order to

enhance their skill level. One of such management trainee programme is the Unilever

Future Leaders Programme (UFLP) that has trained managers who have later occupied

leadership positions across Unilever globally.

The company also gives special emphasis in providing multiple forums for

learning. These forums include quarterly webcasts, continuous guest sessions with

industry leaders and learning portals to ensure an informal flow of best practice sharing

among employees. The employees are encouraged to work anytime or from anywhere as

long as business needs are fully met and performance is determined by results, not

‘time’ or ‘attendance’. Many initiatives to support personal vitality and work-life

balance of the employees have been taken by the company. These include a day care

centre for children of the employees at head office, options for games and physical

fitness on campus, and a platform called 'My Clubs' which helps employees form

collaborative interest groups. These interest groups include a food club, a dance club

among others.

Company’s Human Resource agenda for the year was focused on strengthening

four key areas: building a robust and diverse talent pipeline, enhancing individual and

organizational capabilities for future readiness, driving greater employee engagement

and strengthening employee relations further through progressive people practices at the

shop floor.

R&D, Innovation and technology

Hindustan unilever limited has very strong R&D base with R&D labs in Mumbai

and Bangalore. These labs are significantly aligned to company’s global R&D. The

R&D programmes of the company are focused on development of breakthrough and

proprietary technologies with innovative consumer propositions. The R&D team of over

750 people includes highly qualified scientists and technologists working in the areas of

Health and Hygiene, Laundry, Household Care, Skin Care, Water Purification,

Page 9: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

125

Beverages, Frozen Dessert and Naturals. The R&D group also comprises critical

functional capability teams in the areas of Regulatory, Clinicals, Patents, Information

Technology, Safety and Open Innovation functions.

Some of the major innovations during 2011-2012 include:

• Launching of Fair & Lovely Spot Corrector Pen, Pond’s White Beauty daily

spot-less lightening cream with proprietary photo protection technology

delivering SPF 20 PA++ and Fair & Lovely Anti-Marks

• In Skin Cleansing, the company has launched Lux and Hamam soaps, including

a new variant on Lux, Lux liquid hand wash and body wash along with a range

of facial cleansing products of Pond’s, Fair & Lovely, Vaseline and Dove.

• New variants of Dove hair care range, including shampoo, conditioner were

launched. Clear shampoo was re-launched with a superior formula and a separate

range for men and women.

• Pepsodent Germicheck was re-launched with improved formulation during last

year. Fire-Freeze, the new dual-sensation extra-freshness variant of Closeup was

introduced during the year.

• Food R&D of the company made significant contribution in 2011-12 by

delivering several innovations in the market. Among them were an exciting

range of instant soups under Knorr with the great taste of soups and crunch of

croutons.

• In the Instant Coffee segment, R&D delivered two major products and

packaging innovations – Bru Gold, a premium agglomerated 100% instant

coffee and Bru Exotica, a range of single origin freeze dried coffee, both packed

in an innovative triangular glass bottle design. R&D contributed towards the re-

launched formulation and packaging of Kissan tomato ketchups and Jams.

• In the frozen dessert segment, company’s flagship brand Fruttare made with real

fruits was launched. A premium range of Selection Tubs was launched with a

global packaging design and 3 new flavours.

• R&D made a significant contribution in developing a premium range of

flavoured tea bags under the Taj Mahal brand and a range of ready to drink and

ready to prepare ice tea under the Lipton brand.

Page 10: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

126

The detailed study of HUL reveals that the company has its main focus on R &

D for the improvement of its own products. The company does not develop technology

on its own but it buys or outsources the technology. The company has recently imported

packing machines from Germany. The use of oil fired boilers has been completely

stopped and now the use biomass boilers have been started. The company is very much

clear about the technological issues like: what technology to buy, from where to buy and

when to buy.

Alliance

The company has recently formed joint marketing plans with leading customers

like Walmart, Metro and Tesco. Company created an alliance with Tata Teleservices

Limited (TTSL) for the distribution of telecom products, leveraging its rural distribution

footprint. The Company has enhanced the distribution alliance with TTSL to four states

covering over 150 channel partners. This distribution arrangement is aimed at

accelerating rural growth by enabling the Company to go deeper into rural India due to

improved viability for channel partners. This initiative has helped the Company to build

more stable Shakti entrepreneurs and also enabled it to increase rural investments

thereby unlocking growth in this channel

5.2.5 Strategic Flexibility of HUL

The company has high flexibility as far as launching of new products is

concerned. HUL has launched many new products as per the customer’s requirement in

the recent past. In Skin Care category, the company launched vaseline men range

products with improved features and benefits with distinctive packaging and formats. In

beauty and skin care segment the company introduced new products like Fair & Lovely

Spot Corrector Pen, Pond’s White Beauty daily spot-less lightening cream with

proprietary photo protection technology delivering SPF 20 PA++ and Fair & Lovely

anti-marks during the year. The company has successfully applied its internal R & D in

launching improved versions of Lux and Hamam soaps, including a new variant on Lux

launched with improved consumer benefits. Lux liquid hand wash and body wash were

also introduced in the market along with a range of facial cleansing products of Pond’s,

Fair & Lovely, Vaseline and Dove.

Page 11: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

127

The company also launched new variants of Dove hair care range, including

shampoo and conditioner, in order to meet the needs of different segments of the hair

care market. The company re-launched the clear shampoo with a separate range for men

and women. Pepsodent Germicheck was also re-launched with some major

improvements during the year. Fire-Freeze, a new dual-sensation extra-freshness variant

of Closeup was introduced during the year. R&D in the areas of foods and beverages

made a significant contribution last year to the Company’s foods & beverages portfolio

by delivering a number of innovations in the market. Among them were an exciting

range of instant soups under Knorr with the great taste of soups and crunch of croutons.

Unilever’s flagship brand Fruttare made with real fruits was launched in the frozen

dessert segment.

5.2.6 SWOT Analysis at HUL

Table 5.2 SWOT Analysis at HUL

Strengths Weaknesses

• Number one on FMCG. • Following same policies in all the plants

throughout the world. • High emphasis on safety and quality. • Very strong in-house R&D base. • High commitment from top management. • Wide range of products to satisfy the needs

of customers. • Large network of vendors. • Large number of sales outlets.

• Influence of strong worker union. • HUL has to procure some raw material from

other countries like china, so there are fluctuations in the price of raw material.

• Frequent transfers of employees.

Opportunities Threats

• Rising demand of cosmetic products in the

country. • People are becoming more and more health

conscious so there is an increasing demand of health products.

• The company has started exploring rural areas.

• Growing competition in the market • Reducing profit margins due to increased

competition. • Retaining the trained manpower as a

challenge for the company. • Competitors like ITC Nestle, P&G, Himami

who are manufacturing specific range of products.

Page 12: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

128

5.2.7 SAP Analysis at HUL

Table 5.3 SAP Analysis at HUL

Situation Process

• Strong R & D base with R & D labs in Mumbai and Bangalore. and a team of 750 people

• The company is manufacturing a large variety of products.

• Many other MNCs have entered in this business, giving strong competition to HUL

• Manufactures are offering large verities of products at competitive prices.

• Leadership in technology, innovation and R&D for increased localization.

• Production capacity of the company has increased manifold over the years.

• Increased demand of health products and cosmetic products in the market.

Human Resources • Organizing various programmes for imparting

training to the employees. • Providing multiple forums for learning of

employees. • Strengthening four key areas: building a robust

and diverse talent pipeline, enhancing individual and organizational capabilities for future readiness, driving greater employee engagement and strengthening employee relations further through progressive people practices at the shop floor.

R & D, Innovation and Technology • R & D team working in the areas of Health and

Hygiene, Laundry, Household Care, Skin Care, Water Purification, Beverages, Frozen Dessert and Naturals.

• Bringing new and innovative products in the market and increasing customer base.

• Introducing new verities of products to retain market share.

• Technology up gradation by addition of CNC’s, packaging machines, automation, bio mass based boilers etc.

Alliance • Creating joint Marketing plans with reputed

organizations. • Entering into strategic sourcing with third party

units across the country.

Actors

• Chairman Board of Directors as the key policy maker.

• Managing Director and executive directors to manage day-to-day operational affairs.

• Participation of all the employees to achieve organizational goals and objectives.

• Skilled trained and flexible workforce. • Vendors to HUL for their suggestions and

participation in cost saving and sourcing. • All the customers for their feedback and

suggestions. • A large number of sales outlets

5.2.8 Learning Issues Based upon the detailed study and analysis of HUL, following learning issues have

emerged:

Growing competition

• Manufacturing industry has experienced an unprecedented degree of change in

the recent years due to highly uncertain environmental dynamism. Organizations

need to develop flexibility at strategic level in order to cope with the external

pressure posed by frequent changes. Any organization not adapting these

changes may experience decline in profit and market share.

Page 13: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

129

• An organization may face high degree of competition from competitors, having

better ability to respond to market changes and equipped with better capabilities.

• The case of HUL has revealed that when it came to intense fight with its

competitors, it was mainly due to better capabilities and very high flexibility to

fulfill customer’s requirements which took the company out of blues.

Pace of change

• Apart from having high level of capabilities to change, the change must be at an

adequate pace. The organization must be able to proact or react quickly to

market conditions, customer demands and competitors action. The detailed study

of HUL reveals that the company is fast enough to adopt these changes. This is

evident from frequent launching of new products and improvements in existing

products, The company has extended its base in Health and Hygiene, Laundry,

Household Care, Skin Care, Water Purification, Beverages, Frozen Dessert and

Naturals in the recent years.

• With the help of superior and very high innovative capabilities, strong in house

R & D base, better human resources and technology advancements, the company

has been able to keep the pace with highly dynamic market conditions.

Strategic flexibility dimensions

• The company has a very strong and highly developed vendor’s base that

provides high level of flexibility in supply chain.

• The company has witnessed large number of expansion projects in the past

decade. These expansions can be attributed to strategic sourcing, large number

of vendors and strong human resource base. The high level of manufacturing

flexibility can also be attributed to these factors as well as high level of

innovative capabilities.

• Strong in house R & D base as always helped the company to achieve higher

levels of new product flexibility. The company is always able to launch new

products quickly as soon as the need arises.

Page 14: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

130

5.2.9 Action

The business initiatives taken by HUL depict their success story against

competitors. The reduction of market share is unavoidable due to tough competition, but

still HUL has been able to be a market leader in the areas like Health and Hygiene,

Laundry, Household Care, Skin Care, Water Purification, Beverages. The strong in-

house R&D base, implementation of information and communication technology in a

phased manner, strong support of vendors and suppliers has helped the company to

achieve different dimensions of strategic flexibility, quality, productivity, cost cutting

and achieving short delivery time of new or modified products. The company needs to

further enhance its technological competence and continually employ VA/VE

techniques in house and at vendors place to further improve the various business

performances.

5.2.10 Performance

Major factors of importance for achieving strategic flexibility that need to be

closely monitored in the case of HUL with equal importance are enhancing

technological capabilities, strengthening human resources, expanding the vendor

network and encouraging in-house R & D.

The level of strategic flexibility dimensions has been depicted in figure 5.2

Figure 5.2 Level of strategic flexibility at HUL

02468

10

Manufacturing Flexibility

Market Flexibility

Supply Chain Flexibiity

New Product lexibility

Expansion Flexibility

Page 15: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

131

5.3 Swaraj Mazda Ltd.

Swaraj Mazda Limited was established in 1983. SML is a

Chandigarh, India based automobile company, owned by the Sumitomo Corporation of

Japan and Punjab Tractors Limited of India, with a technical collaboration

with Isuzu and Mazda of Japan. Sumitomo upped its stake in the company in 2009 by

purchasing all of Punjab Tractors remaining shares, raising their stake to 53.5%

Production began in 1985.

The company is a leading manufacturer of light commercial vehicles like trucks,

buses, ambulances, police personnel carriers, water tankers and special vehicles. It

exports its products to countries like Nepal, Zambia, Bangladesh, Kenya, Tanzania,

Ghana, Ivory Coast , Rwanda Syria and Jordan etc. It has a dealer network of about 128

dealers spread throughout India. Swaraj Engines and Punjab Scooters are its associate

companies.

Swaraj Mazda Ltd. entered a new Technical agreement with Isuzu Motors, Japan

in the year 2006. In 2009, Swaraj Mazda started to roll out luxury buses and medium-

duty trucks powered by Isuzu Engines from a new plant in Punjab. The company has

plans to build multi-axle trucks, tractor units and refrigerated trucks within the next

three years. They are currently marketed under the Swaraj Mazda Isuzu brand. In

addition, Swaraj Mazda Ltd. is moving to offer the Isuzu D-Max pickup.

Former associate company Punjab Tractors Ltd. manufactured agricultural

tractors and combine harvesters under the Swaraj brand name before selling 64.6%

to Mahindra Tractors. In 2009, Mahindra and Swaraj Mazda settled a dispute over the

use of the Swaraj name, allowing Swaraj Mazda to continue using the name for only

two more years.

In a board meeting of the Company held on October 1, 2010, the Board of

Directors decided to change the name of the company from Swaraj Mazda Limited

to SML ISUZU Limited.

5.3.1 Business Initiatives and Strategy

The snapshot of the achieved milestone and the business strategy decisions are

delineated and presented in the Table 5.4.

Page 16: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

132

Table 5.4 The snapshot of the achieved milestone at SML

Year Snapshot of achieved milestone by the SML

1983 • Swaraj Vehicles Ltd. incorporated (in July).

1984 • Joint Venture and Technical Assistance concluded between Punjab Tractor Ltd., Mazda Motor

Corporation, Japan & Sumitomo Corporation, Japan. SVL renamed Swaraj Mazda Ltd.

1985 • Project set up with a capacity of 5000 LCVs at capital outlay of Rs.20.0 crores.

• Development of vendor base as per PMP approved by Govt. of India undertaken.

1986 • Commercial operations start.

1987 • Introduction of indigenously developed bus.

1989 • In-house tooling for local production of chassis long member.

1990 • In-house developed Second Truck Model (Swaraj Mazda Super) launched.

1991 • Transmission components indigenised.

1992 • Commencement of Truck supplies to MOD

1993 • Third Truck Model (Swaraj Mazda Premium) launched.

1994 • Declared a Sick Company under SICA (due to Rupee devaluation of 1991-93).

1995 • BIFR approves Rehabilitation Scheme

1996 • 4-Wheel Drive Truck developed.

1997 • Company ceases to be a Sick Industrial Company on the basis of positive net worth - 4 years

ahead of BIFR Scheme pro

1998 • Complete wipe off of accumulated losses

1999 • Bharat Stage-I Emission Norms complied.

2001

• Cumulative sales crossed 50,000 vehicles

• 4 Wheel Drive Ambulance launched in March.

• Economy Truck ‘SARTAJ' launched in August

• .CNG Bus for NCR Delhi launched in October.

• Bharat Stage-II Emission Norms complied.

2002 • Profit Before Tax for FY 2002 crosses Rs. 100 Million mark.

2004 • Profit Before Tax for FY-2004 grows 44% to Rs. 324 Million.

Dividend enhanced to 70%.

2005

• Cumulative sales crossed 86,000 vehicles.

• Bharat Stage-III emission norms complied (both diesel & CNG).

Dividend enhanced to 75%.

• Punjab Tractors offloads 15% of equity stake in favour of Sumitomo Corporation, Japan in June.

• Mazda Motor Corporation offloads 15% of equity holding in favour of Sumitomo Corporation,

Japan in August.

Page 17: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

133

2006

• Permission from Government for new manufacturing facilities at existing site obtained in January.

• Dividend rate lowered to 55% due profit decline Technical Assistance

• Agreement with Isuzu Motors signed in June. Aggregate vehicles sale crosses 1,00,000 in August.

• Construction of Buildings for vehicle expansion and new Bus Body Plant taken up in August.

2007 • Dividend rate maintained at 55% Trial Production of Isuzu Bus LT134 taken up in July.

2008 • Dividend rate maintained at 55% Highest-ever Profits in the history of the Company.

• Launch of Ultra Luxury Buses in July.

2009 • Sumitomo raised its stake in the Company to 53.5% by buying entire equity holding of Punjab

Tractors Ltd. in the Company in January.

2010

• During the financial year 2009-10 company had issued 3,984,946 equity share of Rs. 10 each at a

premium of Rs. 190 per share on rights basis to the Equity shareholders of the company in the ratio

of 11 equity shares for every 50 Equity shares held on the record date and raised Rs. 7,969.89 lacs

for financing of Expansion project, repayment of loan taken from Allahabad Bank (for Expansion

Project) and for general corporate purposes.

2011 • Swaraj Mazda renamed as SML ISUZU LIMITED

5.3.2 Business Performance of SML

In fiscal year 2011-12, commercial vehicle (CV) industry achieved sales of

9,02,000 vehicles representing growth of 19% over the previous year. Out of this, SML

Isuzu segment (5.0 ton to 12.0 ton GVW) accounted for 1,27,300 and represented 14%

of aggregate volumes.

SML has sold a total of 13,646 vehicles during last year against previous year

sale of 12,870 vehicles. Together with sale of spare parts, net revenue for 2011-12 was

Rs. 1042.2 crores as shown below:

(Rs. In Crores)

On sale of Vehicles 968.1

On sale of Spare Parts etc. 74.1

Total Net Revenue 1042.2

The snapshot of the performance of the company and trends in various performance

indicators are listed in figure 5.3.

5.3.3 Dynamic capabilities at SML

Technology, innovation and R&D

SML gets its technology from Isuzu Ltd. Japan. SML has developed in-house R & D

facilities.

Page 18: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

134

Total Expenditure of SML on Research & Development during 2011-12:

(Rs. in lakhs)

(a) Capital 101.35

(b) Recurring 863.40

(c) Total 964.75

(d) R&D expenditure as a %age of total turnover 0.93%

Earnings per share (In lacs) Profit after tax (In crores)

Sales Volume Share price (In Rs.)

Figure 5.3 Business performance of SML during last five years

The in-house Research & Development facility at SML has been duly

recognized by Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR), Govt. of India

since 1987. Major R&D achievements made by the company include:

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

050

100150200250300350400450500

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Page 19: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

135

• Production and launching of S7 model buses on 5100 mm wheel base on SML

platform.

• BS IV compliant engines production and adoption in various models on SML

platform.

• Production of IS12 T model cowl chassis on ISUZU platform in vehicle plant.

• Up gradation of Super 12 model truck on SML platform and adoption of 310

diameter clutch in place of 260 diameter.

• Development of new differential lock rear axle option for 4 wheel drive vehicles

on SML platform

• Design and development of prototype of new, front engine 10.5 meter bus model

IS12B on ISUZU platform.

• Chassis assembly as well as bus body for new 12 meter rear engine bus with

higher capacity of power line designed and prototypes developed on Isuzu

platform.

• Company has commercially launched air-conditioned luxury buses

manufactured at its new bus body plant, after obtaining clearance from

Government testing agencies and extensive test marketing.

Human Resources

SML has always strived to attract the best talent, provide refreshing work

environment, retain achievers and out-performers and inculcate in the employees loyalty

for the organization. Raising employees' involvement in the decision making process

and grooming them for leadership positions has been an ongoing process.

During 2010-11, Company has accomplished a four years wage agreement in

order to bring about further improvement in work culture with increased thrust on

productivity quality and cost reduction. Employee strength at SML as on 31st March,

2012 was 1098.

Alliances

SML has major technical alliance with Isuzu Motors. The company has also

entered major alliances with Peugeot and renault of France, Volkswagen and Man of

West Germany, Leyland of U.K., TAM of Yugoslavia and Isuzu Duihatsu and Mazda of

Page 20: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

136

Japan for technological collaborations. While evaluating the relevant technologies of

these countries, the major criteria was to select a vehicle powered by a four cylinder

diesel engine, capable of providing maximum pay-load capacity best suited for local

conditions and fuel efficient thus ensuring best value for money to the Indian consume.

5.3.4 SWOT Analysis at SML

Table 5.5 SWOT Analysis at SML

Strengths Weaknesses

• A very strong in house R & D centre. • Full technology transfer from Isuzu Ltd.

Japan. • Large number of developed vendors

connected online with the company. • In house development of IT software like

SAP. • Internal brainstorming of employees.

• Bus body manufacturing is outsourced. • Some costly parts and components are

imported from other countries. • Steep rise in the steel price. • No model up gradation of products like Sartaj,

Samrat and Super etc. for the past many years.

Opportunities Threats

• Easy availability of loans. • Rising demand of mini buses with

encouragement to tourism, education and healthcare by Government of India.

• Rising demand of vehicles with alternate fuels like CNG, LPG

• Govt policies like excise rate. • Reducing profit margins. • Rising market share of new entrants and small

scale manufacturers of agricultural equipment. • Rising price of diesel and potential threat of

decontrol of diesel prices. • Reducing profit margins. • Performance of Railways and movement in

freight rates are also key factors that have a bearing on demand for cargo carriers.

5.3.5 SAP Analysis at SML

Table 5.6: SAP Analysis at SML Situation Process

• Full technology transfer from Isuzu Ltd. Japan.

• SML is manufacturing a large variety of commercial and agricultural vehicles.

• A large number of competitors are offering similar products at competitive prices.

Human Resources • Recruiting skilled managers and technical

personals through campus placements from various reputed institutes.

• Raising employees’ involvement in the decision making process.

• Giving special emphasis on the multi-skilling

Page 21: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

137

• Better road conditions giving better economy.

• There has been a steep rise in the sales of commercial vehicles in the country due to growth of tourism, health care industry and educational institutes.

• Abnormal rise in steel prices would lead to higher production cost

• Extra burden from new emission norms would also lead to higher production cost which may not be fully neutralized by revision in selling prices in view of intensely competitive operating environment.

• Quality improvement and cost reduction activities are some of the major initiatives taken by the Company to minimize its vulnerability to business risks.

of employees. • Encouraging team work culture through new

incentive policies. • Continuous education of employees.

R & D, Innovation and Technology • Upgradation of its R&D centre. • Establishment of new manufacturing facilities

for chassis and bus body fabrication • Allocating sufficient funds for in-house R & D.

Total R&D expenditure for the year 2012-2013 as a %age of total turnover was 0.93%.

• Continuously upgrading the existing technology and getting new technology whenever required.

• Changing the existing chassis design to meet the customer’s requirements.

• Updating and making modifications in the existing products to improve their performance as discussed earlier.

• Manufacture of factory-finish buses, ambulances, LCV’s, tankers and school buses..

Alliance • Technical alliance with Isuzu Motors. • Entering into strategic alliances with partners

across the globe for technology transfer and other strategic issues.

• Developing new ancillary units / vendors for the timely and smooth supply of components.

Actors

• Chairman and Board of Directors as key policy makers.

• Vice-chairman and Managing Director to manage day to day affairs.

• Managers and supervisors of the company.

• A sufficiently large network of vendors across the country.

• Skilled, trained and flexible workforce.

5.3.6 Learning Issues

Based upon the detailed study and analysis of SML, following learning issues have

emerged:

Growing competition

• In order to maintain profit, competitive advantage and market share in the

era of tough competition, organizations must be flexible and quick enough to

respond to changing market conditions

• The case of SML shows that the company is facing tough competition from

local level competitors like Sonalika, Standard Combines, and Preet Tractors

etc. apart from global level competitors like TATA, Ashok Leyland and

HMT. An organization may face high degree of competition from

competitors, having better ability to respond to market changes and equipped

with better capabilities.

Page 22: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

138

Pace of change

• Apart from having high level of capabilities to change, the change must be at

an adequate pace. The organization must be able to proact or react quickly to

market conditions, customer demands and competitors action. The detailed

study of SML reveals that the pace at which the company reacts to the

market conditions is not as high as compared to its competitors. This is

evident from the fact that no up gradations have been made in some old

models like Sartaj, Samrat and Super for the past many years.

• However the company has its own R & D plant and it spends a considerable

amount on R & D every year which helps them to incorporate the technical

changes required in various models.

Strategic flexibility dimensions

• The company has a very high supply chain flexibility that can be attributed

to the fact that it has a very large and highly developed vendor’s base that

ensures the smooth availability of parts and components when required.

• The company has undergone many expansion projects in the recent times.

The most recent expansion was the starting of bus body plant near Ropar.

• Strong .In- house R & D at SML is very useful in improving the technical

features of their products. It also helps in doing innovations in the existing

products though the frequency of launch of new products is comparatively

low.

5.3.7 Action

The detailed study of SML indicates that the company has been experiencing

enormous amount of pressure due to number of factors like changing Govt. policies,

reduction in market share and small scale unorganized competitors eating its market

share.

5.3.8 Performance

Major factors of importance for achieving strategic flexibility that need to be

closely monitored in this case with equal importance are enhancing technological

Page 23: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

139

capabilities, attaining new product flexibility, maintaining and expanding the vendor

network and entering into strategic alliances with partners.

The level of strategic flexibility dimensions has been depicted in figure 5.4

Figure 5.4 Level of strategic flexibility at SML

Table 5.7 Comparison of strategic flexibility dimensions of the two manufacturing organizations

Organization HUL SML

Product Mix

Manufacturing of food products, beverages, cleaning agents and personal care products.

Manufacturing of light commercial vehicles like trucks, buses, ambulances and special vehicles

Type of Organization OEM OEM

Customer Focus Very high High

Emphasis on innovation Very high High

Investments in internal R & D Very high Very High

1 Dynamic Capabilities

I Use of Advance Technology +++ ++++

Ii Technological Capabilities ++++ ++++

Iii Innovative Capabilities +++++ +++

02468

10

Manufacturing Flexibility

Market Flexibility

Supply Chain Flexibiity

New Product lexibility

Expansion Flexibility

Page 24: 117 CHAPTER – 5 CASE STUDIES 5.1 Introduction This chapter ...

140

Iv R & D Capabilities +++++ ++++

v Alliance Capabilities ++++ ++++

vi Human Resource Capabilities ++++ ++++

2 Level of Strategic Flexibility Dimensions

I Manufacturing Flexibility ++++ +++

Ii Market Flexibility ++++ ++++

Iii Supply Chain Flexibility +++++ +++++

Iv New Product legibility +++++ +++

v Expansion Flexibility ++++ +++

+ = not at all (very low), ++ = to some extent (low), +++ = to moderate extent (medium), ++++ = to a large extent (high), +++++ = to full extent (very high)


Recommended