12. pieter mathys oes - ocean energy systems

FOD Economy IA day IEA-OES: -6/12/2011 – Pieter Mathys1

EMEC 2008

FOD Economy IA day IEA-OES: -6/12/2011 – Pieter Mathys

2

Green energy…

Out of the Blue

An update of the role of Belgium

within the (IEA-)OES

ir. Pieter Mathys

Prof. Dr. ir. J. De Rouck

([email protected])


Contents

1. Introduction AWW-Ugent

2. Marine Energy?

3. Energy Convertors?

1. Wave Energy Converters (‘WEC’)

2. Tidal Energy Converters (‘TEC’)

4. IEA-OES?

4bis: Belgium support policy…

5. Future participation: options

3


1) AWW - UGent

• Department of Civil Engineering?

– Coastal Engineering

– Roads

– Bridges

• http://awww.ugent.be/

• Technologiepark 904, 9052 Zwijnaarde,

Belgium

4


1) AWW - UGent

• Design, construction and monitoring of coastal structures , mainly breakwaters and sea dikes

• Development and exploitation of measurement jetty and instruments at Zeebrugge for prototype measurements on breakwater

• Two wave flumes (L =15m and L =30 m)• Development of numerical wave laboratory for wave propagation

and interaction with structures • Wave energy & Tidal energy• Integral research (the holy ‘Trinity’)

• Prototype measurements• Fysical modelling(laboratory: wave flumes)• Numerical modelling

5


Contents


2. Marine Energy?




4. IEA-OES?



6


2) Marine Energy?

• Energy sources:

1. Tidal energy: dam (French: barrage)

2. Tidal energy: currents

3. Wave energy

4. Osmotical energy: salt/fresh water gradients

5. Thermal energy: hot/cold water gradients

7


2) Waves: where’s the energy?

8

Cornett 2008



9

Available wave power, expressed in kW/m wavecrest. Source: WorldWaves data/OCEANOR/ECMWF.



10

BO

RE

AS

, Mat

hys

et a

l. 20

11

(fun

ded

by B

ELS

PO

), In

Pre

ss

Wave energy in kW/m

Results from previuous OPTIEP site


2) Where is the Tidal Energy?

11

BO

RE

AS

, Mat

hys

et a

l. 20

11

(fun

ded

by B

ELS

PO

), In

Pre

ss

Wave energy in kW/m

Results from previuous OPTIEP site


2) Wave – Tidal - WindWaves Tidal Current Wind

Meteo Dependant

Time shift of the wind

(difference sea and

swell waves!)

Almost independent, but

highly cyclical (ebb-flood

// spring – neap tide)

Depending on local

wind only

Energy density High, less variable

than wind

high Moderate (5MW for a

diameter of 126m)

Visual hindrance Limited None (except marker

buoys or access

structures)

Yes

Challenges - Efficiency

- ‘Survivability’

- Grid

- Efficiency

- Reliability in marine

environment (salt,

biolfouling)

- Grid

- Capacity factor

- Grid connection

- Reinforcement,

logistics.

Complementary and synergetic possibilities need to be researched!

12


Contents


2. Marine Energy?




4. IEA-OES?



13


3) Wave Energy Convertors

- 6 main types, all of them under full

development

- No clear winner <> wind turbines: 3-bladed

horizontal axis turbine14


3) Tidal Energy Converters: TEC

• Different types, but not as diverse as Wave

Energy Convertors.

15


3) WEC: FlanSea

16

Aim of FlanSea

- Research about all aspects and components of a wave energy convertor…

- Which will lead to a robust and efficient Wave Energy Convertor concept…

- Suited for a moderate wave climate

- Funded by IWT (2.4 mio €) and private partners (seenext slide)


3) WEC: FlanSea

17


3) WEC: FlanSea

18

– Deme Blue Energy(Maritime Engineering)

– Ghent University(Experience and academic know-how about wave energy conversion)

– Cloostermans(Expert in delivery of ad-hoc mechanical solutions and prototypes)

– Spiromatic(Knowledge and expertise in the production of buoys in composite material)

– Electrawinds(Renewable energy producer and grid connection)

– Port Oostende(Focus on renewable energy technologies)

– Contec(Energy delivery, connection with IT systems)


Contents


2. Marine Energy?




4. IEA-OES?



19


4) ‘IEA-OES’ becomes OES

• Ocean Energy Systems:– http://www.ocean-energy-systems.org/

• Belgium:

– Member since 2006

– Limited participation (ExCo representation by UGent)

• Members: Australia, Belgium , Canada , China , Denmark,

Germany, Ireland , Italy , Japan , Mexico , New Zealand ,

Norway , Portugal , Republic of Korea , South Africa , Spain ,

Sweden , United Kingdom , United States of America

• To become member: France, Nigeria & discussions for

Switzerland (!), the Netherlands (see later).

• Roadmap: By 2030 ocean energy will have created 160,000

direct jobs and saved 5.2 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions 20


4) OES members world map

21


4) OES: new roadmap & vision

22


4) Synergies between other sectors

23


4) OES: Meetings participated

• ExCo 17: Oslo

– Uppsala, Lysekill � Flansea

– Inore symposium: article newsletter

• ExCo 16: Bilbao

– Mutriku, wave farm

• ExCo 15: Brest

– ICOE 2008 conference

24


4) OES: Meetings not participated

• ExCo 18: Wellington New Zealand (Eyjafjallajökull)

• ExCo 19: Dublin

• ExCo 20: Washington

• ExCo 21: Madeira

• ExCo 22: Korea: march 2012, explicit question from

OES chairman to send a Belgian Deleguate.

25


4) IEA-OES: Annexes

• 1: Review, exchange and dissemination of Information on

Ocean Energy Systems

• 2: Development of Recommended Practices for testing and

evaluating Ocean Energy Systems (links with TC114 and

Equimar project)

• 3: Integration of Ocean Energy Plants into distribution and

Transmission Electrical Grids

• 4: Assement of environmental effects and monitoring efforts

for Ocean, Wave, Tidal and Current Energy Systems

• 5: Exchange and Assessment of Ocean Energy Device Project

Information and Experience

– Belgium is member of 1 & 2, but was not a main contributor to the

annexes 26


4) Input from Belgium to OES

• http://www.ocean-energy-systems.org/country-info/belgium/

27


4bis) Belgium support policy

• Tradable Green Certificates

– Support mechanism

– Guarantee of origin

– Certificate obligation

�Market transparancy, sometimes difficult administration

(cfr recent VREG report on tariff for renewable energy)

�Independent of the electrity produced

• Both on federal and Flemish level

– But limited harmonization…

28


4bis) Belgium: support

Energy source Minimumprice

GSC (€/MWh)

Guaranteed term

(year)

Offshore-wind, first 216 MW 107 20

Offshore-wind, above 216

MW, same concession are

90 20

Onshore-wind 50 10

Solar 150 10

Hydropower (‘waterkracht’) 50 10

Others (amongst them

biomass)

20 10

Aankoopverplichting ELIA, KB 5 oktober 2005 (BS 14.10.2005)

29


4bis) Flanders: support policyEnergy source Minimum price

GSC to be paid by

grid regulator

(€/MWh)

Term

(year)

Solar – fading out 350 � 90 20/15 (?)

Hydropower, wave, tidal, earth heat,

on shore wind, solid or liquid biomass,

biomass waste, biogas

90 10

Biogas from wastewater sludge,

incineration of waste

60 10

Biogas from manure, vegetables, fruits

or garden waste

100 20

Others 60 10

Decreet algemene bepalingen energiebeleid, Geconsolideerde versie 2011.

30


4bis) Flanders: solar GSC

31

20 year,After 2013: 15 year, to be evaluated

German offshore wind similar


4bis) German offshore wind

32


4bis) Belgium: so what is it?

• Flemish support?

– North Sea from low water

line? � Federal!

– <70 kV: Flemish, > 70 kV

Federal

• (Nota Di Rupo July: difference

transmission-distribution vs 70

kV)

• Federal support?

– What is ‘hydro’energy? Not

defined!33


4bis) Belgium: so what is it?

• Flemish support?

– Unclear, most likely not

applicable (personal

communication VREG)

• Federal support?

– Unclear, no clear view on

‘hydropower’ definition

• Best case: 90 €/MWh, 10 yr

• Mid case: 50 €/MWh, 10 yr

• Worst case: 20 €/MWh, 10 yr34


Contents


2. Marine Energy?




4. IEA-OES?



35


5) Future role / participation Belgium

• Key moment: industry is at stall speed

• Should Belgium form a wave/tidal energy

cluster? Open debate

– University representation has limitations � only

travel expenses, no personel budget, makes any

(pro-) active or long term committment impossible

– Some options:

• Sector Federation: Agoria AREC?

• Dutch Example: EWA: Nederlandse Vereniging voor

Energie uit Water 36


5) Future role: EWA example?

37

AgentschapNL Rob de Reu www.agentschapnl.nl Overheid

Alkyon Rob Steijn www.Alkyon.nl Adviesbureau

Blue motion energy Eric Geutjes www.bluemotionenergy.eu Ontwikkelaar

Bluerise Berend Jan Kleute Ontwikkelaar

Bluewater Engineering Allard van Hoeken www.Bluewater.com Offshore Engineering

DE Koepel

Monique Van

Eijkelenburg www.DEKoepel.org Branch organisatie

Delta NV Jan Maas www.Delta.nl Energiebedrijf

Deltares Marcel Bruggers www.Deltares.nl Kennisinstelling

ECN Beleidstudies Sander Lensink www.ecn.nl Kennisinstelling

Eneco NV Glenn Bijvoets www.Eneco.nl Energiebedrijf

Energy Valley Pieter Bergmeijer www.energyvalley.nl Overheid

E.ON www.Eon.nl Energiebedrijf

Huisman Equipment Roelof Zeijlemaker www.huismanequipment.com Offshore Engineering

HydroRing Eric Govers hydroringcapital.nl Ontwikkelaar

IF Technology Dhr Meijer www.iftechnology.nl industrie

IHC Merwede Justus de Wit www.ihcmerwede.com Offshore Engineering


5) Future role: EWA example?Istimewa Elektro François Lelieveld www.istimewa-elektro.nl Engineering

KEMA www.kema.nl Adviesbureau

MARIN Bas Buchner www.Marin.nl Kennisinstelling

MET-support i.o. Peter Scheijgrond www.met-support.com advies

Provincie Friesland www.fryslan.nl Overheid

Provincie Noord-Holland www.noord-holland.nl Overheid

Provincie Zeeland Leo van der Klip www.zeeland.nl Overheid

Provincie Zuid-Holland www.zuid-holland.nl Overheid

RED Stack Pieter Hack www.redstack.nl Ontwikkelaar

Rijkswaterstaat Annet Augustijn www.rijkswaterstaat.nl Overheid

Royal Haskoning Mark van Zanten Adviesbureau

TNO Science and Industry

Harald van der Mijle

Meijer www.tno.nl Kennisinstelling

Tocardo Hans van Breugel www.Tocardo.com Ontwikkelaar

TU Delft Elektro Henk Polinder www.ewi.tudelft.nl Kennisinstelling

TU Delft Maritiem prof. Rene Huijsmans www.3me.tudelft.nl Kennisinstelling

TU Delft Offshore prof Kees Willemse www.citg.tudelft.nl Kennisinstelling

TU Delft Wind prof Gerard van Bussel www.duwind.tudelft.nl Kennisinstelling38


Conclusion

• Marine industry is at stall speed

– Belgium future role?

– Please: clarify and adapt the support system: no

technology can be commercially implemented

with the current policy

• Wave-tidal energy sector?

– EWA example the Netherlands

39

Date post:	02-Dec-2014
Category:	Technology
Upload:	implementingagreements
View:	584 times
Download:	1 times